Questions and Replies

Filter by year

21 February 2018 - NW6

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

What (a) plans has her department put in place in respect of the augmentation of existing and the development of new bulk water infrastructure to mitigate the effects of climate change on the provision of bulk water in the Western Cape Province and (b) is the status of the (i) plans and (ii) financing thereof?

Reply:

(a) My Department is working on the implementation of the Berg River-Voelvlei Augmentation Scheme (BRVAS). This project augments the Western Cape Water Supply System that serves the Cape Town Metropolitan and surrounding smaller urban areas as well as irrigators in the area. In addition to the BRVAS project, various surface water schemes (e.g. the Michell’s Pass Diversion, Further Phases of the Vloevlei Dam Augmentation, Upper Wit River Diversion, Molenaars River Diversion and the Raising of the Lower Steenbras Dam) are at various stages of investigation for further augmentation of the system in the medium- to long-term.

(b)(i) Planning work for the BRVAS project has been concluded and environmental authorisation is expected by May 2018, if there are no snags with appeal process. However, considering the severe drought situation prevailing in the region, I have whilst awaiting the approval or finalization of the environmental authorization appointed the Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority (TCTA) to secure funding and implement the project on a fast-track basis. The TCTA is currently engaging the City of Cape Town and other potential users of the water to finalize off-take agreements.

(b)(ii) The TCTA is currently engaging the National Treasury to obtain approval on a funding mechanism and the required guarantees.

---00O00---

18 December 2017 - NW3594

Profile picture: Motau, Mr SC

Motau, Mr SC to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) What is the total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid by (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her for more than (aa) 30 days, (bb) 60 days, (cc) 90 days and (dd) 120 days and (b) what is the total amount outstanding in each case?

Reply:

(a)(i) My Department has currently a total of five (5) disputed unpaid invoices for more than 60 days at R 64 604.12; a total of two (2) disputed unpaid invoices for more than 90 days at R 883 101 646.14; and a total of 29 disputed unpaid invoices for more than 120 days at R 85 226 308.47.

It should be noted that there are various reasons for disputed invoices as follows:

  • Discrepancies with regards to the actual invoices;
  • Contractual arrangements;
  • Discrepancies regarding supplier details;
  • Discrepancies regarding banking details;
  • Work done not supported by a certified engineer; and
  • Unverifiable work.

(a)(ii) Refer to the table below for the total number of supplier invoices that are currently unpaid by my Entities:

 

Total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid

Total amount outstanding in each case

(aa)Total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid more than 30 days

720

R 116 677 218.85

(bb)Total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid more than 60 days

933

R 47 366 803.03

(cc)Total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid more than 90 days

571

R 170 050 648.10

(dd) Total number of supplier invoices that currently remain unpaid more than 120 days

128

R 125 015 841.38

TOTAL AMOUNT

2352

R 459 110 511.36

---00O00---

18 December 2017 - NW3923

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) What is the total number of households that were moved to make space for the Nandoni Dam in Limpopo, (b) was a settlement agreement reached between her department and the households that were moved, (c) what is the total monetary value of the settlement, (d) what amount was given to each household and (e) what are the details of persons who have (i) received and (ii) not yet received the settlement as at 27 November 2017?

Reply:

a) The total number of households that were moved to make space for the Nandoni Dam is 465 (which included recognition of families desiring to separate/divorce, one Musanda, three churches, one clinic, two business; one government and community buildings). These structural replacements should were separate from the relocation of 2 100 subsistence farmers.

b) Yes, a settlement agreement was reached with the affected households/ community. The Relocation Action Plan (RAP) was developed with the project steering committee which comprised of provincial and territorial authorities.

c) The total monetary value of the settlement is R 8,005,248.79.

d) and (e)

It must be noted that the compensation system adopted to mitigate losses and other disadvantages caused by the project strived for reinstatement as a preferred option rather than monetary value. Where reinstatement was impractical or inadequate, resort was made to other forms of compensation. In addition to reinstatement, the following households were also compensated in monetary value.

See attached Annexure A.

---00O00---

14 December 2017 - NW2906

Profile picture: Kopane, Ms SP

Kopane, Ms SP to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

What is the detailed (a) breakdown of and (b) valuation for current and non-current assets and investments held by (i) her department and (ii) each entity reporting to her according to (aa) listed assets (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held and (bb) unlisted investments (aaa) directly held and (bbb) indirectly held by each of the entities, in each case breaking the current assets and investments down by 0-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and beyond 12 months?

Reply:

Refer to the table below for the detailed breakdown for the branch CFO: Main Account in my Department also refer to Annexure A for the detailed Breakdown from Construction Unit.

Main Account as at 31 August:

 

0-3 months

3-6 months

6-12 months

12 months

(a)(aa)(aaa) Breakdown of listed assets directly held

None

None

None

None

(a)(bbb)

Breakdown of listed assets indirectly held

None

None

None

None

(b) Valuation for current and non-current assets

None

None

Current assets

Non-Current Assets

(b)(bb)(aaa) Unlisted investments directly held

None

None

None

None

(b)(bb)(bbb) Unlisted investments indirectly held

None

None

None

None

Refer to Annexure B for the detailed breakdown for the Entities reporting to me.

---00O00---

14 December 2017 - NW2720

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

With reference to her reply to question 581 on 3 May 2017, (a) what is the current amount owed by her department to the 15 water boards and (b) in each case, (i) what is the name of the water board owed, (ii) what amount is outstanding and (iii) on what date will the amounts be paid?

Reply:

a) My Department is currently owing R47 803 754.46 to three (3) Water Boards as at 13 December 2017 as per the table below:

(b)(i) Name of Water Board

(b)(ii) Amount

(b)(iii) Expected date of payment

Sedibeng Water Board

R 29 930 475.82

20 December 2017

Rand Water Board

R 11 842 268.80

20 December 2017

Bloem Water Board

R 6 031 009.84

20 December 2017

Total

R 47 803 754.46

 

---00O00---

14 December 2017 - NW3501

Profile picture: Ryder, Mr D

Ryder, Mr D to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)What is the current status of the construction of the Rietspruit Outfall Sewer Pipeline in Midvaal and Emfuleni which is currently threatening the construction of houses in Savanna City; (2) has a contractor been appointed; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date will a contractor be appointed; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) what is the planned completion date of the project?

Reply:

(1) Rietspruit Outfall Sewer Pipeline project has recently been incorporated into the Sedibeng Regional Sewer Scheme (SRSS) based on the recommendation of the SRSS Technical Feasibility Study review. Risimati Consulting Engineers Pty (Ltd) were appointed by Emfuleni Municipality before the project was incorporated into the SRSS and to date, about 50% of the detail design of the sewer pipeline has been completed. Since the project is now part of the SRSS and Rand Water is the Implementing Agent for SRSS, the Risimati contract is to be ceded to Rand Water. Currently the due diligence exercise is underway at Rand Water, and it is about 90% complete.

(2) No, the contractor has not yet been appointed. Once the Rasimati Consulting Engineers have completed the detail design of the sewer outfall pipeline, then a competent contractor to do the construction work will be appointed following Rand Water’s procurement process.

(3) Subject to availability of funds, the Rietspruit Outfall Sewer pipeline project will commence in the next financial year, and will run for a period of 3 years.

---00O00---

14 December 2017 - NW3462

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)How many officials and/or employees in her department were granted permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings in the past three financial years; (2) are any of the officials and/or employees that have permission to have businesses and/or do business dealings doing business with the Government; if so, (a) what was the purpose of each business transaction, (b) when did each business transaction occur and (c) what was the value of each business transaction?

Reply:

(1) A total of 67 officials and/or employees in my Department have been granted permission to have businesses.

(2) No officials and/or employees have permission to do business with Government.

---00O00---

04 December 2017 - NW3756

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Whether (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her procured services from a certain company (name furnished); if so, (i) what services were procured in each case and (ii) what is the total amount that was paid to the specified company in each case; (2) whether the specified company provided services related to international travel to (a) her department and/or (b) entities reporting to her; if so, (i) what is the name of each person who travelled, (ii) what was the travel route and (iii) what is the total amount that was paid for each person?

Reply:

1. None

2. My Department has not used Travel with Flair services 2016- 2017 for Main Account and Water Trading Entity (WTE).

---00O00---

04 December 2017 - NW3674

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Whether all the necessary water rights have been obtained for the Hoedspruit bulk water supply pipeline currently under construction in the Mopani District Municipality in Limpopo; if not, (a) why not and (b) by which date will all the necessary water rights be obtained; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) (a) who are the beneficiaries of the specified pipeline and (b) by which date will the pipeline deliver water for the first time to the beneficiaries?

Reply:

1. The Water Use License was issued by the Department of Water and Sanitation on 30 August 2015. The issued licence authorises the Mopani District Municipality to abstract a total volume of two million, six hundred and seventy six thousand (2 676 000) cubic metres per annum of water from the Blyde River for 38 villages in the Mopani District Municipality for domestic water supply.

2. Out of the 38 villages expected to benefit, the following villages are expected to benefit from Hoedspruit Bulk Water Supply:

  1. Drankensburg
  2. Drankenburg Park
  3. Extension 10 (Retirement Village)
  4. Extension 12 (Zandspruit Estate)
  5. Extension 8
  6. Hoedspruit Town
  7. Hoedspruit Wildlife Estate
  8. Extension 7 (Estimated)
  9. Raptors View
  10. Kampersrus
  11. Scotia

The Municipality is considering amendment of the scope of work, which will now make the completed work dependent on the merged and revised scope of work, which is subject to approval. The project in question is funded through the Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) and is the municipality’s project where the Department plays a supporting role but do not implement the project.

---00O00---

04 December 2017 - NW3631

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether (a) her department and/or (b) any entity reporting to her own land; if so, in each case, (i) where is each plot of land located, (ii) what is the size of each specified plot and (iii) what is each plot currently being used for?

Reply:

a) The Minister hereby submits the land register which carries the DWS immovable water infrastructure. The land assets are grouped per type of use and are based on representative land areas that the DWS requires to host, access and maintain these assets. The fair values were calculated using representative land costs for urban and rural settlement areas, open rural land and tribal land.

The DWS is currently busy reconciling this register with the available title deeds, which is a time-consuming process, considering that not all title deeds and Surveyor-General (SG) diagrams are electronically available and that many of the tribal land areas still need to be formalized. The land asset register has been developed on the basis of control other than ownership.

The type of land ownership comprises: (Land Asset register attached)

  • State owned land where the DWS or DPW own the land due to permanent use such as:
  • Dam basins to store water and to cater for increased dam levels during flood events.
  • Administrative buildings such as offices, residential housing, workshops and stores.
  • Special facilities such as pump stations, water treatment works, reservoirs and wastewater works.

Servitudes on private and tribal land to carry the following types of infrastructure and to provide access to this infrastructure for operation and maintenance purposes:

  • Canals
  • Pipelines
  • Tunnels
  • Access roads to dams and other buildings

Servitudes for “backwater” events, when water levels in rivers exceed the normal flood lines due to the backwater effect of dams. These are only applicable upstream of dams.

b) The land area was calculated using the definition of control, meaning the minimum area that is required to accommodate the above water storage at dams, access to bulk distribution infrastructure and flood events. This considered representative servitude widths, where these are not available from title deeds, and representative unit costs of land.

 (i) Location is available on a GIS; attached tables summarize the location per DWS scheme, area office and operating cluster.

(ii) Size of each item on the land register is shown in square meters in each table.

 (iii) Use of the land is listed under the column “Facility Type Description”.

---00O00---

04 December 2017 - NW3155

Profile picture: Filtane, Mr ML

Filtane, Mr ML to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1) When was she informed of the water crisis at the Butterworth Hospital in the Eastern Cape which resulted in patients being discharged to go home and suffer or probably die; (2) whether she notified the essential services such as the Butterworth Hospital of the water shortage; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (3) whether her department has taken any urgent steps to address the water crisis in the specified hospital in order to avoid the loss of lives; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1) On 24 January 2017, I was informed of the water crisis pending drought disaster not limited to the Butterworth Hospital but for the entire Butterworth in the Eastern Cape. The Amathole District Municipality (DM) re-declared the drought in January 2017.

(2) Yes, essential services such as the Provincial Department of Health was kept abreast of the unfolding disaster through stakeholder meetings which included the Provincial Drought Technical Task Team, Provincial Sector Departments meetings and Joint Operation Committee meetings held in Butterworth where they were requested to make their own intervention plans as the Amathole DM made it clear that it would not have the capacity to provide the full water demand.

(3) Weekly dam levels have been provided by the Department to the Amathole DM and Provincial Disaster Management Centre. When the situation at Xilinxa Dam supplying Butterworth and surrounding areas became alarming, it was anticipated that it will have serious effect on the hospital and other institutions such as the Walter Sisulu University (WSU) campus. Regular drought water crisis meetings were held with the Amathole DM as the Water Services Authority and other key stakeholders, where they were requested to provide the drought intervention plans.

When the surface water supply to Butterworth (Xilinxa Dam and Gcuwa Dam) ran out completely, the Amathole DM prioritised carting of water to the Hospital. Owing to the logistics and costs of carting water from the nearest alternative source some 30km away, the Amathole DM was unable to meet the full demand at the hospital as well as to provide basic supply to all domestic consumers in Butterworth.

My Department has conducted drought awareness campaigns in Butterworth and has granted permission to the Amathole DM for the re-allocation of the Water Services Infrastructure Grant (WSIG) funding to accommodate emergency water supply in Butterworth through the Butterworth Emergency Water Supply Scheme (pipeline from Tsomo River to Xilinxa Dam), water tankering and groundwater investigations, namely, hydrogeological investigations, drilling, testing and equipping of boreholes at Butterworth, Kotana, Ehlobo, Teko Springs and WSU.

My Department approached the Office of the Premier, Provincial Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA) and Provincial Treasury; as a result an amount of R 3 million has been pledged to assist Amathole DM with the drought.

Fortunately the water outage was short lived and the rain which fell from
8 to 9 October 2017 brought relief and the Gcuwa Dam was filled, but the Xilinxa Dam only rose to 7%, which will provide approximately 3 months supply. Butterworth is therefore not out of the crisis yet and needs close monitoring hence my Department has allocated Amathole DM with ten water tankers.

---00O00---

04 December 2017 - NW3673

Profile picture: Mileham, Mr K

Mileham, Mr K to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Whether the construction of the Hoedspruit bulk water supply pipeline in the Mopani District Municipality in Limpopo was (a) put out to tender and (b) advertised; if not, in each case, why not; if so, (i) on which date(s), (ii) what were the outcomes of the supply chain management processes and (iii) what are the details of the project plan, including the phases of delivery of each component of the project; (2) (a) where is the starting point of the pipeline, (b) where will the water be treated, (c) what is the capacity of the pipeline, (d) what is the current status of the project and (e) from which water scheme will the water for the pipeline be sourced?

Reply:

1. The project in question is being implemented by the Mopani District Municipality and it is funded through Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) which is being administered by the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA). The Department of Water and Sanitation was only involved during the recommendation of the Technical Report submitted to source funding for the project. The Technical Report was approved in 2013 and the following scope of work was completed by the Mopani District Municipality:

  • (a) New 5.94km long 400mm diameter steel pipeline starts from the connection point at Parma to the water treatment works site in Hoedspruit. The original scope of works as contained in the Technical Report was to treat raw water at Hoedspruit Water Treatment Works that was proposed to be built, however; the water will now be sourced from Blyde River and be treated at the new treatment works situated at Kampersrus.

2. Refer to the response provided in (1) above.

---00O00---

04 December 2017 - NW3644

Profile picture: Xalisa, Mr Z R

Xalisa, Mr Z R to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

What is the annual water usage in each of the eight metropolitan municipalities?

Reply:

The following are metros in respect to the question with their respective registered volumes:

Name

Province

Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality

Eastern Cape

City of Cape Town Metropolitan Municipality

Western Cape

City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality

Gauteng

City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality

Gauteng

Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality

Gauteng

eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality

KwaZulu-Natal

Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality

Free State

Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality

Eastern Cape

Registered Water User

Sum of Registered Volume (cubic metres): For 01 Jan 2017 to 31 Dec 2017

BUFFALO CITY

72 310 000

CITY OF CAPE TOWN METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

317 700 000

EKURHULENI METROPOLITAN COUNCIL

60 000

ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY

1 417 520

MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

14 957 254

NELSON MANDELA BAY MUNICIPALITY

132 443 822

TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY

134 875 283

Grand Total

673 763 879

   

---00O00---

04 December 2017 - NW3643

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

What is the annual water usage in each province?

Reply:

The Department manages water per Water Management Area (and not per ‘province’). Below is summary of the total registered volume:

WMA

Sum of Registered Volumes (cubic metres) for period: 2017-01-01 to 2017-12-31

BERG-OLIFANTS

1 341 739 433

BREEDE-GOURITZ

1 499 696 315

INKOMATI-USUTHU

2 479 490 938

LIMPOPO

2 153 656 956

MZIMVUBU-TSITSIKAMMA

1 914 733 771

OLIFANTS

1 900 596 161

ORANGE

2 120 134 824

PONGOLA-UMZIMKULU

2 694 816 103

VAAL

4 000 022 723

Grand Total

20 104 887 223

---00O00---

13 November 2017 - NW3025

Profile picture: Dreyer, Ms AM

Dreyer, Ms AM to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)What is the (a) total amount that was paid out in bonuses to employees in her department and (b) detailed breakdown of the bonus that was paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2016-17 financial year; (2) what is the (a) total estimated amount that will be paid out in bonuses to employees in her department and (b) detailed breakdown of the bonus that will be paid out to each employee in each salary level in the 2017-18 financial year?

Reply:

1(a) 1.5% of the total provision for salaries is allocated towards performance reviews. This regulation is provided for by the Department of Public Service and Administration. My Department has complied with the regulation and a total of
1 961 employees qualified for performance bonuses.

(b) See table below for a detailed breakdown of payout to officials that qualified in the 2016/17 financial year.

SALARY LEVEL

TOTAL NUMBER OF OFFICIALS

AMOUNT PAID

2

191

R 1 006 931.58

3

166

R 1 109 388.28

4

67

R 462 316.22

5

159

R 1 530 318.61

6

252

R 2 742 637.89

7

313

R 4 238 651.31

8

238

R 3 776 621.45

9

114

R 2 138 783.22

10

171

R 4 054 542.86

11

107

R 2 807 539.15

12

181

R 6 501 801.50

13

1

R 58 092.84

14

1

R69 069.60

Grand Total

1961

R30 496 693

 

(2) Performance rewards for the 2017-18 financial year have not been finalized, as the financial year ends in March 2018.

---00O00---

13 November 2017 - NW3324

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Whether the (a) chief executive officer and (b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to her are employed on a permanent basis; if not, (2) whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so, (a) what are the names of each of the officers and (b) when (i) was each officer employed and (ii) will each officer’s contract end?

Reply:

(ii) Entity

(1)Whether the

(a) chief executive officer of entities reporting to her are employed on a permanent basis,if not,

(b) chief financial officer of entities reporting to her are employed on a permanent basis,if not,

(2)whether the specified officers are employed on a fixed term contract; if so,

(a)what are the names of each of the officers

(b)when

       

(i) was each officer employed

(ii) will each officer’s contract end

Amatola Water

Fixed-term contract basis

Fixed-term contract basis

Ms. Asanda Gidana (Acting CEO)

CEO was appointed on an acting capacity as of 1 August 2017

until further notice

     

Ms. Kwandiwe Mviko(Acting CFO)

CFO was appointed on an acting capacity as of 21 August 2017

until further notice

Bloem Water

Fixed-term contract basis

Permanent

Dr L Moorosi

CEO was appointed on 15 April 2013

Yes, Contract will end 30 April 2018

     

Mr. OJ Stadler

CFO was appointed in October 1995

No, Contract is indefinite

Lepelle Northern Water

Fixed-term contract basis

Fixed-term contract basis

Mr. Phineas Legodi (CEO)

CEO was appointed on 1 January 2017

Yes, Contract will end 31December 2021

     

Ms. Sibongile Valoyi (Acting CFO)

CFO was appointed to act as of 1 August 2017

until further notice

Magalies Water

   

Mr Sandile Mkhize

CEO was appointed to act as of 9 September 2016.

until further notice

     

Ms K. Kgatuke,

Resigned on the 31 August 2017

Recruitment for the new CFO is currently in progress

Mhlathuze Water

Fixed term contract

Fixed term contract

Mr. Mthokozisi Pius Duze (aCEO)

8 June 2016

until further notice

     

Mr. Brian Ndaba (CFO)

1 November 2012

31 October 2018

Overberg Water

Fixed-term contract basis

Permanent

Mr Phakamani Buthelezi (acting CEO)

July 2017 Secondment

Undetermined

     

CFO post is put on an acting basis due to an administrative process.

CFO post is put on an acting basis due to an administrative process.

CFO post is put on an acting basis due to an administrative process.

Rand Water

Fixed term contract

Fixed term contract

Mr Dinizulu Kumalo Percival Sechemane (CEO)

1 September 2013

31 August 2018

     

Ms Matshidiso Sylvia Nyembe (CFO)

18 May 2014

17 May 2019

Sedibeng Water

Fixed-term contract basis

Permanent

Mr. Rembuluwani Tradewin Takalani (CEO)

CEO was appointed on 20 May 2014

Yes, Contract will end on 30 June 2019

     

Ms. Mpinane Shasha (CFO)

CFO was appointed on 1 February 2015

No, Contract is indefinite

Umgeni Water

Fixed term contract

Fixed term contract

Mr Thami Hlongwa (aCEO)

01 July 2013

30 June 2018

     

Mr Thami Hlongwa (CFO)

01 July 2013

30 June 2018

TCTA

Fixed-term contract basis

Fixed-term contract basis

Mr. NL Radzuma (Acting CE)

Acting CEO was appointed on 1 November 2016

February 2018, where after Mr. Radzuma will revert to his role as Chief Risk Officer (CRO)

     

Ms. H Nazeer (CFO)

CFO was appointed on 1 September 2016

Yes, Contract ends 31 August 2019

WRC

Fixed term contract

Permanent basis

Mr Dhesigen Naidoo

01 October 2011

30 September 2021

           

---00O00---

13 November 2017 - NW3184

Profile picture: Tlhaole, Mr L S

Tlhaole, Mr L S to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)What are the details including the ranks of service providers and/or contractors from which (a) her department and (b) the entities reporting to her procured services in the past five years; (2) what (a) service was provided by each service provider and/or contractor and (b) amount was each service provider and/or contractor paid; (3) (a) how many of these service providers are black-owned entities, (b) what contract was each of the black-owned service providers awarded and (c) how much was each black-owned service provider paid?

Reply:

1. Below is a summary of the number of service providers awarded contracts within the Water Trading Entity for the past five years: A detailed list is attached as Annexure A.

Financial Year

Number of service providers awarded

Value of contracts awarded

Number of black owned service providers

2012/2013

84

R 851 828 015,69

15

2013/2014

20

R 4 934 499,54

4

2014/2015

56

R 146 923 138,43

46

2015/2016

49

R1 042 073 454,66

32

2016/2017

73

R 2 577 015 536,13

53

TOTAL

282

R4 622 774 644,45

150

Below is a summary of the number of service providers awarded contracts in the Main Account for the past five years. A detailed list is attached as Annexure B.

FINANCIAL YEAR

Number of service providers awarded

Value of contracts awarded

Number of black owned service providers

2012-2013

27

R751 398 911.58

2

2013-2014

31

R1 102 770 352.49

8

2014-2015

30

R1 549 933 060.69

11

2015-2016

31

R1 833 330 569.24

12

2016-2017

64

R649 265 895.74

16

TOTAL

183

R5 886 698 789.74

49

--00O00---

30 October 2017 - NW3110

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

What are the details of (a) the cost of the new technology implemented by Bloem Water to reduce electricity use, (b) the savings made in each month as a result of the implementation of the specified technology, (c) the total savings made since the implementation of the specified technology, (d) the running cost of the specified technology and (e) how the specified technology works?

Reply:

(a) The total cost for the Hydro Power project including (Civil, Mechanical, Electrical and Automation) amounted to R 2 604 215.00, this cost includes a Turbine which cost R1 000 000.00.

(b) An average monthly saving of R2 528.93 has been realised towards the Electricity costs of the Bloem Water Head Office block, these has been realised since the Hydro Power has been operational; especially during peak months of the winter season from 2016 to date.

(c) A total savings of R40 462.84 has been realised in the past 16 months, this includes the months where the Hydro Power was not operational because of the maintenance or repair activities.

(d) The total running costs, including repairs and maintenance over the past 16 months is R 162 721.00 [this includes some of the changes made during the first year of implementing the project where operational challenges were experienced as it was the first time such a project is implemented at any organisation (technology wise) in South Africa].

(e) The Brandkop Hydropower plant is a research project launched by Bloem Water in partnership with the Water Research Commission (WRC) and the University of Pretoria capable of producing 90kw/h of electricity used by the Head Office of Bloem Water. This is achieved through the use of the purified water passing through the pipeline before entering the main Reservoir Brandkop. The quality of treated water during the process is not compromised. The entire operation is controlled and monitored automatically by means of Programmable Logic Controllers and Telemetry systems which are operated at one of Bloem Water’s Treatment Works (Welbedacht Dam 150km away) by Process Controllers 24hrs, 7days a week.

---00O00---

30 October 2017 - NW3197

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

With reference to her reply to question 1987 on 9 October 2017, how many litres of water are lost annually due to water leaks in each metropolitan municipality in each province?

Reply:

Refer to the table below for the litres of water lost annually due to water leaks in each metropolitan municipality.

Province

Metropolitan Municipality

Volume of water lost (Mega Litres/Annum)

Volume of water lost (Litres/Annum)

Western Cape

City of Cape Town

42 177

42 177 000 000

Eastern Cape

Nelson Mandela Bay

40 093

40 093 000 000

 

Buffalo City

21 307

21 307 000 000

Gauteng

City of Johannesburg

107 006

107 006 000 000

 

City of Tshwane

70 423

70 423 000 000

 

Ekurhuleni

59 321

59 321 000 000

Free State

Mangaung

9 969

9 969 000 000

KwaZulu-Natal

eThekwini

93 680

93 680 000 000

Total

 

443 976

443 976 000 000

 

---00O00---

30 October 2017 - NW3196

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

With reference to her reply to question 1987 on 9 October 2017, what are the relevant details of the annual amounts that all the documented water leaks are costing each province?

Reply:

Kindly refer to the table below for the annual amounts that all the documented water leaks are costing each province. The amounts are calculated at a unit cost of R6 per 1000 litres of water.

Province

Volume of water lost (Mega Litres/Annum)

Volume of water lost (Litres/Annum)

Annual amounts (Rands/annum

Western Cape

64 788

64 788 000 000

388 728.00

Easter Cape

121 589

121 589 000 000

729 534.00

Northern Cape

34 534

34 534 000 000

207 204.00

Gauteng

295 187

295 187 000 000

1 771 122.00

Free State

76 793

76 793 000 000

460 758.00

KwaZulu-Natal

238 614

238 614 000 000

1 431 684.00

Limpopo

124 013

124 013 000 000

744 078.00

Mpumalanga

93 239

93 239 000 000

559 428.00

North West

84 462

84 462 000 000

506 772.00

Total

1 133 219

1 133 219 000 000

6 799 314 000.00

---00O00---

30 October 2017 - NW2721

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) What is the current progress of the (i) blue and (ii) green drop assessments of her department, (b) by what date is the final assessment report expected, (c) what is the projected total cost of each assessment and (d) who will conduct the assessments in each case?

Reply:

(a)(i) The Blue drop progress assessments for 2015 data have been completed and the progress assessments for 2016 data will only be initiated in the last quarter of 2017/18.

(ii) The Green drop progress assessments for 2015/16 are currently in progress.2015/16 are currently in progress.

(b) The blue drop progress assessment report for 2015 data is currently being edited and will be submitted for approval. The 2015/16 draft Green drop progress report will be developed in the first quarter of 2018/19.

(c) The blue drop and green drop progress assessments are currently being done internally.

(d) The full assessments will be done by departmental staff with the support of a service provider. The estimated cost of using external resources is R10.6 million for 2017/18 (blue drop progress and green drop full assessments).

---00O00---

30 October 2017 - NW3192

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

With reference to her reply to question 1987 on 9 October 2017, (a) in which municipality and (b) ward are most of the leaks located in (i) Gauteng and (ii) KwaZulu-Natal provinces?

Reply:

(a) Municipalities with most leaks are located in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal. The Department does not assess location of water leaks by wards system. Instead, Municipalities provide information on water leaks as per distribution/ reticulation systems in accordance with either the number of households, total reservoir supply area and/or systems operating pressure regime.

(b)(i) In Gauteng Province, the municipality with the most leaks is the Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality.

(b)(ii) In KwaZulu-Natal Province, the municipality with most leaks is the EThekwini Metropolitan Municipality.

---00O00---

26 October 2017 - NW3111

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) What is the (i) current status of (aa) Phase 1 and (bb) Phase 2A of the Mokolo and Crocodile River (West) Water Augmentation Project and (ii) total amount that (aa) has been spent to date and (bb) will be spent on completion of each project, (b) by what date will each phase be completed and (c) how many litres of water will be transferred from the Crocodile River through each project?

Reply:

(a)(i)(aa) The current status of Mokolo and Crocodile River (West) Water Augmentation Project (MCWAP) Phase 1:

    • Phase 1 was commissioned in June 2015. The project is at Defects Notification Stage, which will be completed in October 2017. The project (excluding refurbishment) will be closed in June 2018, after the environmental rehabilitation of the servitude and land owner sign off on the various farm portions.
        • The refurbishment of the old pipeline from Mokolo Dam is primarily aimed as back-up supply to Lephalale Municipality during maintenance outages on the main pipeline, in lieu of 18 day storage capacity. The pipeline will also offer some redundancy to other water users. The refurbishment is forecasted to be completed in December 2022, if a go-ahead is given in the current financial year.

(a)(i)(bb) The current status of Mokolo and Crocodile River (West) Water Augmentation Project (MCWAP) Phase 2A:

        • Phase 2A is at the planning stage, after the confirmation of the transfer capacity of 75 million m3 per annum.
        • The EIA and other Planning work is expected to be concluded by December 2018. 
        • TCTA will raise commercial funding and implement MCWAP-2A with co-funding from the fiscus. I have granted TCTA a borrowing limit, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, to raise commercial funding for the project. Approval to issue government guarantees in relation to some of the funding to be raised by TCTA has been granted.
        • The requirements for fiscal funding contributions are being addressed to cover this year’s commitments in order for pre-construction activities to start by January 2018 in accordance with the current programme to achieve water delivery by October 2023 and to achieve Eskom’s required water delivery date for Medupi FGD retrofitting (to reduce Sulphur emissions) in terms of Eskom’s World Bank loan commitments.

(a)(ii)(aa)The Total Amount spent Mokolo and Crocodile River (West) Water Augmentation Project (MCWAP) Phase 1 is as follows:

  • MCWAP 1:- Expenditure to date is R 1 602 466 000.
  • MCWAP 2:- No expenses to date

(a)(i)(bb) The total amount spend for Mokolo and Crocodile River (West) Water Augmentation Project (MCWAP) Phase 2A

    • MCWAP 1:- Forecasted cost to complete (including refurbishment) is R 2 138 635 114 (on the base date of 2015)
    • MCWAP 2:- Forecast project costs is R 13 308 127 000

(b) The phases will be completed as follows:

  • MCWAP 1:- Project excluding refurbishment will be closed in June 2018.
  • MCWAP 1:- Project including refurbishment will be closed in Dec 2022.
  • MCWAP 2:- Water delivery is forecasted for October 2023, and project closed in October 2025, after rehabilitation of the servitude and land owner sign off.

(c) The total amount of Litres transferred is as follows:

  • MCWAP 1:- Zero liters from Crocodile River, and 30 million m3 per annum (30 billion litres per annum) from the Mokolo Dam
  • MCWAP 2 will transfer 75 million m3 per annum (75 billion litres per annum) from the Crocodile River.

---00O00---

19 October 2017 - NW2851

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Has she authorised a certain company (name furnished) to undertake listed water use despite the suspension of its water use licence as a result of an appeal in respect of that licence pending before the Water Tribunal; if not, what enforcement action is her department taking to stop the specified company from undertaking the listed water use it has announced; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(a) No, the Minister has not authorised Kropz Elandsfontein (Pty) Ltd formerly Elandsfontein Exploration and Mining (Pty) Ltd to undertake listed water use despite the suspension of its water use licence as a result of an appeal in respect of that licence pending before the Water Tribunal.

(b) The Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement team of my department conducted an inspection on the 06 September 2017 at Portion 4 of farm Elandsfontein 349, Malmesbury Rd which is a property of Kropz Elandsfontein (Pty) Ltd formerly Elandsfontein Exploration and Mining (Pty) Ltd in respect of which a water use licence that was issued by my department. The finding of this inspection is that there was no water use taking place in the said property in violation of water use licence suspension

---00O00---

19 October 2017 - NW2306

Profile picture: Mashabela, Ms N

Mashabela, Ms N to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Have any appeals been lodged with her in terms of section 41(6) of the National Water Act, Act 36 of 1998; if not, why not; if so, how many have been (a) lodged and (b) decided; (2) will the Water Tribunal be retained as an appeal authority in the upcoming draft Water and Sanitation Bill; if not, why not?

Reply:

(1) From 2008 to 2017, a total of 414 appeals have been lodged, and 4 decided; 74 withdrawn by appellants.

(2) No. The reason for discontinuation Water Tribunal is that the Water Tribunal is not an efficient, cost effective and speedy mechanism for the resolution of appeals arising from the implementation of the Act. The new Bill seeks to provide for an administrative dispute resolution mechanism which is more efficient, cost effective, and quicker.

---00O00---

09 October 2017 - NW1987

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

How many litres of water are lost annually due to leaks in each province?

Reply:

Refer to the table below for the amount of litres of water lost annually in each province due to leaks:

Province

Volume of water lost (Mega Litres/Annum)

Volume of water lost (Litres/Annum)

Western Cape

64 788

64 788 000 000

Easter Cape

121 589

121 589 000 000

Northern Cape

34 534

34 534 000 000

Gauteng

295 187

295 187 000 000

Free State

76 793

76 793 000 000

KwaZulu Natal

238 614

238 614 000 000

Limpopo

124 013

124 013 000 000

Mpumalanga

93 239

93 239 000 000

North West

84 462

84 462 000 000

Total

1 133 219

1 133 219 000 000

---00O00---

09 October 2017 - NW2592

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

When are the application dates (a) opening and (b) closing for the board positions of all entities and councils reporting to her?

Reply:

Refer to table below:

No.

Name of Entity

(a) Opening for the board positions

(b) Closing for board positions

1.

Amatola Water

The Board of Amatola Water was appointed in February 2016.

The term of office of the Board expires in 2020.

2.

Bloem Water

The Board of Bloem Water was appointed in April 2014.

The term of office of the Board expires in 2018.

3.

Lepelle Northern Water

The Board of Lepelle Northern Water was appointed in April 2016

The term of office of the Board expires in 2020.

4.

Magalies Water

The Board of Magalies Water was appointed in April 2014.

The term of office of the Board expires in 2018.

5.

Mhlathuze Water

The term of office of the Board was terminated in April 2017. The acting Chief Executive was appointed as the Accounting Authority in terms of Section 49(2) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) as amended.

The process for the appointment of a new Board has commenced.

6.

Overberg Water

The term of office of the Board was terminated in June 2017. The acting Chief Executive was appointed as the Accounting Authority in terms of Section 49(2) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) as amended.

Process for the appointment of a new Board has commenced.

7.

Rand Water

The Board was appointed in April 2014.

The term of office of the Board expires in 2018.

8.

Sedibeng Water

The Board was appointed in April 2017.

The term of office of the Board expires in 2021.

9.

Umgeni Water

The term of office of the Board was terminated in June 2017. The acting Chief Executive was appointed as the Accounting Authority in terms of Section 49(2) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No.1 of 1999) as amended.

The process for the appointment of a new Board has commenced.

10.

Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority (TCTA)

The Board of the TCTA was appointed in December 2015.

The term of office of the Board expires in 2018.

11.

Water Research Commission (WRC)

The Board of the WRC was appointed in 2016.

The term of office of the Board expires in 2020

12.

Inkomati-Usuthu CMA

The Board of Inkomati-Usuthu CMA was appointed in 2014

The term of office of the Board expires in 2018

13.

Breede-Gouritz CMA

The Interim Board of Breede-Gouritz CMA was appointed in 2014

The term of office of the Board expires in 2018

---00O00---

09 October 2017 - NW2177

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether the report of the Motau Task Team that was set up by her to investigate procurement irregularities has been finalised; if not, (a) why not and (b) on what date is it expected to be finalised; if so, will she furnish Ms T E Baker with a copy of the specified report?

Reply:

Requesting Honorable Member to refer to the response provided in NA 1666 of 9 June 2017.

---00O00---

28 September 2017 - NW2600

Profile picture: Mathys, Ms L

Mathys, Ms L to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

What numbers of mines were found not to be compliant with regulations pertaining to water use licences (a) in the 2016-17 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2017?

Reply:

(a) So far there is no mine that achieved a hundred percent compliance with its water use license conditions. The non compliance varies and is assessed according to the impact posed to the water resources and the environment in relation to specific conditions. Non-compliance depending on the impact or threat posed may either be addressed through an action plan, administrative, civil or criminal enforcement. Out of 111 mines that were monitored in the 2016/2017 financial year, 55 mines were found to be significantly not complying with the conditions of the water use license of which 25 mines were referred for enforcement actions (refer to Annexure A). The other 30 mines were requested to provide action plans to address non-compliance.

(b) For the 2017/18, (April to June) 22 mines were monitored with 15 mines significantly not complying of which 8 required enforcement actions.

---00O00---

Annexure A

Quarter 1 (APRIL - JUNE 2016)

 No

Water Sector

Name

Province

PoE received

Finding/
Motivation

1

Mining

Exxaro Leeupan Coal Mine

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

2

Mining

Umcebo Middelkraal Colliery

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

3

Mining

Bankfontein

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

4

Mining

Exxaro Matla

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

5

Mining

Kangala

MP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

6

Mining

Homelands Energy

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

7

Mining

Palesa

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

8

Mining

Hoshoza Resources: Karoboo Colliery

KZN

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

9

Mining

Grootegeluk Coal Mine

LP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

10

Mining

Mogalakwena Platinum Mine

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

11

Mining

Venetia Diamond Mine

LP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

12

Mining

Vele Colliery

LP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

13

Mining

Tshikondeni Coal Mine

LP

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

14

Mining

Ocon Brick Audit

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

15

Mining

Evander Gold

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

16

Mining

New Vaal Colliery

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

17

Mining

Lonmin Platinum Mine

NW

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

18

Mining

Northam Platinum Mine: Zondereinde division

NW

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

19

Mining

Elitheni Coal

EC

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

20

Mining

Kalagadi Manganese Mine

NC

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

           

Quarter 2 (JULY - SEPTEMBER 2016)

 No

Water Sector

Name

Province

PoE received

Finding/
Motivation

1

Mining

Anglo Coal: Kromdraai

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

2

Mining

Anglo Coal: Navigation

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

3

Mining

Anglo American: Twickenham

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

4

Mining

Brackfontein: Tegeta Resources & Exploration

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

5

Mining

Xstrata: Goedgevonden Colliery

MP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

6

Mining

Hlagisa Mining Wildfontein Colliery

MP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

7

Mining

Glencore: Tavistock Coal

MP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

8

Mining

ATC Impunzi Complex

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

9

Mining

ASA Dilokong Chrome Mine

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

10

Mining

Mtotolo Platinum Mine

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

11

Mining

Elandsfontein Colliery

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

No 

Water Sector

Name

Province

PoE received

Finding/
Motivation

12

Mining

Ezulwini

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

13

Mining

City Deep Gold Mine

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

14

Mining

Penumbra Coal Mine

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

15

Mining

New Kleinfontein Mine

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

16

Mining

Rand Uranium

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

17

Mining

New Denmark Colliery

GP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

18

Mining

Tronox Mine

WC

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

19

Mining

Tronox MSP

WC

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

20

Mining

Grootegeluk Coal Mine

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

21

Mining

Vele

LP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

22

Mining

Tshikondeni

LP

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

23

Mining

Venetia

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

24

Mining

Mogalakwena

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

25

Mining

Beestekraal Mine - Portland Cement

NW

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

26

Mining

Sibanye Platinum Mine

NW

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

27

Mining

Pilanesberg Platinum Mine

NW

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

28

Mining

PMG

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

29

Mining

Hotazel Manganese Mine: Hotazel site

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

30

Mining

Hotazel Manganese Mine: Wessels Mine

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

31

Mining

Hotazel Manganese Mine: Middleplaats

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

32

Mining

Hotazel Manganese Mine: Mamatwane mine

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

           

Quarter 3 (October - December 2016)

No 

Water Sector

Name

Province

PoE received

Finding/
Motivation

1

Mining

Marula Platinum Mine

MP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

2

Mining

Mpuyelo Group: Rhirhanzo Colliery

MP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

3

Mining

Sudor Coal: Halgewonnen

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

4

Mining

Glencoe Optinum: Kwagga Section

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

5

Mining

Stuart Coal

MP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

6

Mining

Umzobanzi Coal

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

7

Mining

Shanduka Graspan Colliery

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

8

Mining

Anglo Inyosi Kriel Colliery

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

9

Mining

Woestalleen Mine

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

10

Mining

Koffiefontein Mine

FS

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

11

Mining

Matsopa Mineral KoppiesnBentonite Mine

FS

Yes

No authorisation. This mine has to be taken out of the report

12

Mining

Crown Mine

GP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

 No

Water Sector

Name

Province

PoE received

Finding/
Motivation

13

Mining

Ergo Mine

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

14

Mining

Vunene: Usutu Colliery

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

15

Mining

International Ferro Metals and TC Smelter

NW

Yes

Not reporting under Mining move to Industry

16

Mining

Ferro chrome boshoek smelter and mine

NW

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

17

Mining

Horizon Chrome mine (previously Merafe Ferrochrome)

NW

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

18

Mining

Schmidtsdrift Mine

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

19

Mining

Assmang: Black Rock (Lometag)

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

20

Mining

Hautian Manganese

NC

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

21

Mining

Rooipoort Mine

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

22

Mining

Brandywine Valley Investments: Uitkomst Colliery

KZN

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

23

Mining

Brandywine Valley Investments: Wykom Siding

KZN

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

24

Mining

Hlobane: Tshoba

KZN

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

25

Mining

Hlobane: Nkongolwane

KZN

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

26

Mining

Tshikondeni Colliery

LP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

27

Mining

Venetia

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

28

Mining

Grootegeluk Coal Mine

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

29

Mining

Mogalakwena Platinum Mine

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

30

Mining

Vele Colliery

LP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

           

Quarter 4 (January - March 2017)

 No

Water Sector

Name

Province

PoE received

Finding/
Motivation

1

Mining

BECSA: Khutala Colliery (South 32)

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

2

Mining

Anglo Thermal Coal: Kleinkopje Colliery

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

3

Mining

Clencore: Tweefontein Complex

MP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

4

Mining

Wescoal: Intibane Colliery

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

5

Mining

Anglo Coal: Mafube Colliery

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

6

Mining

BECSA: MMS Klipfontein Section (South 32)

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

7

Mining

African Exploration: Vlakfontein Colliery

MP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

8

Mining

Anglo Gold Ashanti: Mponeng

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

9

Mining

Mission Point Trading 41 (Pty) Ltd

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

10

Mining

Mashala Resource: Fereira Mine

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

No 

Water Sector

Name

Province

PoE received

Finding/
Motivation

11

Mining

South Gold Exploration (Sebanye Burnstone Mine)

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

12

Mining

Harmony gold mine - Kusasalethu & Deelkraal Operation

GP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

13

Mining

Xstrata Alloys Eland Platinum Mine

NW

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

14

Mining

Maseve Platinum Mine

NW

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

15

Mining

Lonmin Platinum Mine

NW

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

16

Mining

Mr M Mdlulane

NC

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

17

Mining

MN Mbonose

NC

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

18

Mining

Sishen Iron Ore

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

19

Mining

Scarlet Sun Mine

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

20

Mining

De Beer Micro Diamonds

NC

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

21

Mining

Mr OA Witkoei

NC

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

22

Mining

HE Louw

NC

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

23

Mining

Mrs FE Mali

NC

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

24

Mining

BM Marman

NC

Yes

Acceptable 75-100%

25

Mining

Crown Resources

NC

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

26

Mining

Vele

LP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

27

Mining

Venetia

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

28

Mining

Grootegeluk

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 25-49%

29

Mining

Tshikondeni

LP

Yes

Good but at risk 50-74%

30

Mining

Mogalakwena

LP

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

31

Mining

Somkhele Tendele Mine

KZN

Yes

Not acceptable 0-24%

           
 

Overall 52% out of 111

     

28 September 2017 - NW2307

Profile picture: Tlhaole, Mr L S

Tlhaole, Mr L S to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) Given that the previous Blue and Green Drop reports were published in 2013, when will the next Blue Drop and Green Drop reports be published and (b) what action is her department taking to prevent untreated water contaminated with sewage being released from waste water treatment plants in violation of those licences, given that waste water treatment plants are licensed by her department?

Reply:

(a) The next Blue Drop progress assessment report will be finalised by end October and will be published once it is approved. The Green Drop assessment commenced in August 2017 for a self assessment by Municipalities. The report writing will be finalised in April 2018 and report will be published once it is approved.

(b) The Department does regular monitoring of wastewater treatment plants through compliance monitoring and where transgressions are realized Directives are issued to Municipalities and ways are established to turn the situation around. Over and above, the Department also plays a support role by facilitating funding for these wastewater treatment works. The Department also has an enforcement function that work with compliance monitoring section, to ensure that administrative enforcement are enacted once it is observed that despite all the support provided to assist municipalities the situation of non-compliance still persist and only then can legal actions taken.

---00O00---

28 September 2017 - NW2305

Profile picture: Rawula, Mr T

Rawula, Mr T to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

What factors does she or the person delegated in this regard consider when taking a decision in terms of section 148(2)(b) to uplift the suspension of appeal to the Water Tribunal pending the outcome of such an appeal?

Reply:

The Minister of the Department of Water and Sanitation lifts a suspension of a license pending the outcome of the appeal made to the Water Tribunal when a petition is made indicating any of the following:

  1. that the granting of all authorisations or a water use licence followed all relevant due processes;
  2. that the suspension is highly prejudicial and detrimental to a lawfully obtained authorisations;
  3. that the suspension will derail the entire project timelines and create uncertainties;
  4. that the suspension will put hundreds of millions of investments at risks as well as forego much needed jobs and community development projects;
  5. that the issues raised by the Appellants in the appeal should be decided upon by the Water Tribunal, and the Appellants will not be prejudiced by the lifting of the suspension; and
  6. if the reasons provided by the person who is affected by the suspension are persuasive.

---00O00---

28 September 2017 - NW2089

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether (a) her department and/or (b) any entities reporting to her are funding, including by way of discretionary funding, any institution of research and development (i) domestically and/or (ii) internationally; if so, (aa)(aaa) what are the names of the specified institutions and (bbb) what are their functions, (bb) from what date has her department or any entity reporting to her been funding them and (cc) what amount has her department contributed towards such funding?

Reply:

(a)(i) Yes, my Department and entities reporting to me are funding, including by way of discretionary funding, institution of research and development domestically. Refer to the tables below:

Department of Water and Sanitation:

(a)(aa)(aaa) Names of the specified institutions

(a)(aa)(bbb) Their functions

(a)(bb) From what date

(a)(cc) what amount

The Stellenbosch University (South Africa)

As per mandate of the (AU/NEPAD), Stellenbosch University hosts the secretariat of the AU/NEPAD Southern African Network of Water Centres of Excellence since 2009. The role of the secretariat is to facilitate research and capacity development activities and initiatives in line with the Southern African Development Community Regional Strategic Action Plan (SADC-RSAP) and the AU-African Ministers’ Council for Water (AU-AMCOW).

From 25 November 2015 to 24 November 2018

R1 million rand (One Million Rand) per annum

Entities:

Entity (b)

(i)

(ii)

(aa)(aaa)

(aa)(bbb)

(bb)

(cc)

Amatola Water

No

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Bloem Water

No

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Lepelle Water

No

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Magalies Water

No

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Mhlathuze Water

No

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Overberg Water

No

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Rand Water is funding Professorial Chairs for research and development program per annum.

Domestically

 
  • Tshwane University of Technology
  • University of Pretoria

Tshwane University of Technology funded for three Professorial Chairs viz., Chair in Water Utilisation, Chair in Organic Chemistry and Chair in Electrical Engineering.

University of Pretoria funded for four Professorial Chairs, viz., Chair in Microbiology, Chair in Public health, Chair in Mechanical Engineering and Chair in Civil Engineering.

2013 - 2018

R1.2 million per annum.

Sedibeng Water

No

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Umgeni Water

Domestically

No

University of KwaZulu-Natal (Higher Education Institution)

Umgeni Water Chair of Water Resources Management funded at approximately R2.4million/annum; MOU

2011

NA

     

Durban University of Technology (Higher Education Institution)

Funding of R100 000 provided to date based on requests and approved projects; MOU

2014

 
     

Mangosuthu University of Technology (Higher Education Institution)

 

2014

 

TCTA

No

No

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

WRC

WRC does fund institutions of research and development to conduct research projects. The WRC funds R&D projects as part of its core mandate as per the Water Research Act. The funding goes to South African research organizations directly. For purposes of simplicity given the large scope of the question the WRC will restrict its answer to cover only the new R&D projects initiated in the 2017/18 financial year.

Yes

The list of organizations and institutions with WRC funding for new projects initiated in the 2017/18 financial year is attached to this memo as Annexure A. There are 41 research organizations that receive WRC R&D funding for new projects categorized broadly as indicated in

Higher Education (Universities): R58.4 Million

R&D SMMEs. R33.7 Million

Science Councils R11.9 Million

Funding is done on a project to project basis. This done via annual calls for proposals. The funding allocated for the 2017/18 year is R104 Million.

The co-contribution to the R&D budget from DWS is R17.6 Million for these new projects.

Refer to Annexure A

---00O00---

Annexure A

Organisation

Number of Projects

Total Budget

North-West University

3

R2 400 000

University of Pretoria

5

R6 980 450

University of KwaZulu-Natal

4

R7 337 272

University of Cape Town

7

R12 667 592

Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

1

R1 250 000

University of the Witwatersrand

2

R1 766 576

University of Stellenbosch

4

R4 792 233

University of Johannesburg

2

R2 268 000

Rhodes University

1

R2 929 600

Monash University South Africa

1

R3 000 000

University of the Free State

2

R5 618 000

University of Limpopo

1

R2 000 000

University of Venda

2

R1 850 000

Cape Peninsula University of Technology

2

R1 842 000

Vaal University of Technology

1

R1 710 000

Biomimicry SA

1

R1 600 000

Eco-Pulse Environmental Consulting Sciences

1

R1 292 000

Terrasim cc

 

R1 725 000

The Moss Group

1

R909 378

NuWater South Africa (Pty) Ltd

1

R1 836 400

WRP Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd

1

R340 000

Conningarth Economists

1

R570 000

Isidima Design and Development Pty

1

R741 000

CSV Water Consulting Engineers

1

R600 000

Chris Swartz Water Utilisation Engineers

1

R1 000 000

TruSense Consulting Services

1

R1 299 600

VitaOne8 (Pty) Ltd

1

R300 000

Partners in Development (Pty) Ltd

1

R342 000

Freshwater Research Centre

1

R4 000 000

C Jarmain Independent Researcher

1

R3 395 600

Bunker Hills Investment

1

R600 000

Mahlahthini Organics

1

R2 700 000

Nxt2U (Pty) Ltd & UP Consortium

1

R2 000 000

Delta-H (Pty) Ltd

1

R1 000 000

IWR Water Resource (Pty) Ltd

1

R2 500 000

Geowater IQ (Pty) Ltd

1

R250 000

Quantitative Evidence Research Consultancy Services cc

1

R300 000

Eon Consulting

1

R600 000

Golder Associates Africa

3

R3 894 000

ARC

1

R1 200 000

CSIR

6

R10 685 920

Total

26

R104 092 621

The list of organisations or Institutions with WRC/DWS funding.

21 September 2017 - NW1865

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Whether any Suikerbos pump sites were (a) stripped and/or (b) upgraded during the past five financial years; if so, (i) which pump sites were stripped or upgraded, (ii) when were they stripped or upgraded, (iii) what amount was the contractor paid in each case and (vi) what is the name of the contractor in each case; (2) whether any contractor failed to fulfill their contract; if so, (a) which contractor, (b) what aspects of the contract did they fail to fulfill and (c) what action has been taken against them in each case?

Reply:

We record our undertaking as that the questions relate to Rand Water Zuikerbosch Pumping Station. We also respond with understanding that stripping refers to demolition of infrastructure for the purpose of constructing the new infrastructure, upgrade refers to augmentation. We refer to augmentation when we upgrade our infrastructure to meet water supply demands.

Rand Water implemented augmentation programmes at Zuikerbosch pumping station to provide additional capacity of 200 Ml/d. Annexure A shows augmentation projects implemented at Rand Water Zuikerbosch pumping station in the last five years. The balance of the other contracts at Zuikerbosch pumping station over the last five years is shown in Annexure B.

(1)(a) Refer to Item 7 on Annexure A regarding what was a demolition work which entailed demolition of an old pilot filter house 2B. Demolition was necessary so that new filter house 2B to provide additional 100 Ml/d could be constructed. Refer to Item 11 on Annexure A was the construction of a new sedimentation tank to provide additional 100 Ml/d. The contractor could not achieve contractual obligations and some structures had to be demolished and reconstructed properly.

(1)(b) Refer to the Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13 and 14 on Annexure A regarding all upgrades forming part of augmentation projects at Zuikerbosch pumping station as part of additional 200 Ml/d added to the infrastructure to meet water supply demands. Items 7 and 11 on Annexure A refer to demolition work (stripping) and the rest of the items refer to augmentation (upgrades).

(2)(a) Demolition work as referred to in Item 7 on Annexure A shows Jampe Construction being the contractor that failed to demolish an old pilot filter house 2B. They were appointed for R1, 736,009 and were paid R342, 510 at the time of terminating their contract due to non-performance. The termination was referred to mediation as per the provisions of contract and the termination was upheld by the mediator. After they were terminated, their remaining scope of work was added to the work awarded to Superway (Pty) Ltd. In addition to demolition of an old pilot filter house 2B, Superway was appointed for the construction of the new filter 2B.

(2)(b) Refer to Item 11 on Annexure A regarding upgrade workshows Dipcivils (Pty) Ltd being the contractor that failed their contractual obligations to construct a new sedimentation tank. They were appointed for R103, 349,955.00 and were paid R57, 911,310.90 at the time of terminating their contract due to non-performance. As of part recouping the costs, Rand Water has held the surety (R10.3m) and retention (R5.8m) from the contractor. The total amount held is R16.1m which is the sum of surety and retention. Furthermore, Rand Water's Legal Service Department has been pursuing claim for damages. Dipcivils had undergone business administration in the process.

---00O00---

21 September 2017 - NW2352

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)(a) For how long has the position of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) at the Overberg Water been vacant (b) why has this vacancy not been filled; (2) Whether the current acting CEO was ever recommended for permanent appointment in this position; if so, (a) on what date was the recommendation first made and (b) why has no action been taken in this regard?

Reply:

(1)(a) The position of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Overberg Water has been vacant since May 2015 to date.

(1)(b) My Department seconded Ms ONV Fundakubi as the acting CEO at Overberg Water. The secondment was effective from 1 July 2015 and terminated on
22 June 2017.

(2) Yes, the current acting CEO, Mr Phakamani Buthelezi, was recommended by the selection panel for permanent appointment as CEO at Overberg Water.

(2)(a) On 9 March 2016, the panel recommended to the Overberg Water Board the approval of the appointment of Mr Buthelezi for the position of CEO at Overberg Water.

(2)(b) My Department wanted the Board and former Acting CEO, Ms Fundakubi to deal with all outstanding issues related to the finalisation of the Annual Report of 2016/17 before processing the appointment of the new CEO.

---00O00---

21 September 2017 - NW2351

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) What are the qualifications requirements for the position of General Manager of the Project Management Unit at Magalies Water, (b) who is the current incumbent, (c) is the person serving in a permanent capacity and (d) what are the details of the specified person’s qualifications?

Reply:

a) Relevant Degree or BTech in Civil Engineering, Master Degree advantageous (The job advert of the position is attached).

b) The current incumbent is Ms Tsakane Radebe.

c) The position is a 5-year contract and the successful candidate assumed her duties effective from the 01 May 2016.

d) The details of the specified person’s qualifications are as follows:

  • Matric
  • National Diploma: Mechanical Engineering
  • Bachelor of Technology: Mechanical Engineering
  • Project Management Professional
  • Certified Associate in Project Management

---00O00---

21 September 2017 - NW2350

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether the internal audit function of Magalies Water has been outsourced; if so, (a) why, (b) for what period, (c) which company is performing the internal audit function, (d) what are the terms of the contract and (e) what is the total amount that has been paid to the specified company to date?

Reply:

a) The internal audit function at Magalies Water is outsourced because the entity currently does not have an established internal audit division.

b) The duration of the period is three (3) years. The contract commencement date is 01 October 2015 and will expire on 30 September 2018.

c) The internal audit function is outsourced to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS.

(d) Terms of the contract are as follows:

1. Provision of Internal Audit Services:

  • Evaluating adequacy and effectiveness of controls and advising managers at all levels in determining key control indicators and develop recommendations for enhancement or improvement of these controls;
  • Assisting the Chief Executive Officer in achieving the objectives of the institution by evaluating and developing recommendations for the enhancement or improvement of processes through which —
  • Objectives and values are established and communicated;
  • The accomplishment of objectives is monitored;
  • Accountability is ensured; and

2. Corporate values are preserved:

      • Analysing operations and conformity to organisational mandate; and
      • Reviewing the Internal Audit Charter for the approval by the Audit and Risk Committee and Magalies Water Board, and thereafter adhere to the Charter;
      • Liaising with the Risk Specialist in the development of a risk-based 3-year rolling internal audit plan;
      • Conducting forensic audits as and when required;
      • Evaluating specific operations at the request of the Board or management, as appropriate;
      • Maintaining professional audit staff with sufficient knowledge, skills, experience and professional certification to meet the requirements of the internal audit charter;
      • Evaluating adequacy and effectiveness.

(e) The total amount paid is R4 213 594.28

---00O00---

21 September 2017 - NW2349

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)What position does a certain person (name furnished) hold at Magalies Water; (2) has the specified person ever (a) been charged for fraud or (b) had any allegations of corruption levelled against him while serving in roles prior to his appointment to Magalies Water which he declared; if so, (i) what are the relevant details in each case and (ii) has the specified person been cleared of any charges and allegations of wrongdoing?

Reply:

(1) Adv. Mosotho Petlane holds the position as the Chairperson of Magalies Water Board.

(2)(a) Yes, Adv. Petlane was charged in 2005 for fraud. However, the case was dismissed by the Court of Law.

(2)(b) No, my Department is not aware of any allegation that was leveled against Adv. Petlane.

(2)(b)(i)Magalies Water does not have the details of the allegations.

(2)(b)(ii)Yes, the case was dismissed by the Court of Law.

---00O00---

21 September 2017 - NW2354

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) What amount was spent on emergency works at waste water treatment plants in each province in the (i) 2014-15, (ii) 2015-16 and (iii) 2016-17 financial years and (b) what are the details of the (i) locations, (ii) name of each municipality, (iii) nature of the intervention and (iv) cost of the intervention in each case?

Reply:

My Department did not implement any emergency Waste Water Treatment Plants (WWTP) projects in the 2014/15 and 2015/16 financial years. The amount spent on emergency works at waste water treatment plants in each province in the 2016-17 financial years is detailed in the table below:

PROVINCE

LOCATION

MUNICIPALITY

PROJECT NAME

NATURE OF INTERVENTION

PROJECT COST

Free Sate

Oranjeville

Metsimaholo

Refurbishment of Oranjeville Waste Water Treatment Works.

Refurbishment of WWTW and Pump Stations (Mechanical and Electrical)

R8 012 848.39

Free Sate

Deneysville

Metsimaholo

Refurbishment of Deneysville Waste Water Treatment Works.

De-sludging of WWTW ponds

R2 468 343.42

Free Sate

Vrede

Phumelela

Refurbishment of Vrede Waste Water Treatment Works.

Refurbishment of WWTW and Pump Stations (Mechanical and Electrical)

R42 457 532.10

Free Sate

Harrismith

Maluti-A-Phofung

Refurbishment of Wilge Waste Water Treatment Works.

Refurbishment of WWTW (Mechanical and Electrical)

R11 853 659.90

Free Sate

Reitz

Nketoana

Refurbishment of Reitz Waste Water Treatment Works.

De-sludging of WWTW ponds and the refurbishment of Mechanical and Electrical components.

R24 409 008.78

Free Sate

Viljoenskroon

Moqhaka

Refurbishment of Viljoenskroon Waste Water Treatment Works.

Refurbishment of WWTW (Mechanical and Electrical)

R15 058 146.26

Free Sate

Bothaville

Nala

Refurbishment of Bothaville Waste Water Treatment Works.

Refurbishment of WWTW and Pump Stations (Mechanical and Electrical)

R17 163 326.86

Free Sate

Frankfort

Mafube

Refurbishment of Frankfort Waste Water Treatment Works.

De-sludging of WWTW ponds and the refurbishment of Mechanical and Electrical components.

R8 816 442.23

Free Sate

Villiers

Mafube

Refurbishment of Villiers Waste Water Treatment Works.

De-sludging of WWTW ponds and the refurbishment of Mechanical and Electrical components.

R8 217 708.53

Free Sate

Qalabotjha

Mafube

Refurbishment of Qalabotjha Waste Water Treatment Works.

De-sludging of WWTW ponds and the refurbishment of Mechanical and Electrical components.

R16 634 295.75

Free Sate

Namahadi

Mafube

Refurbishment of NamahadiWaste Water Treatment Works.

De-sludging of WWTW ponds and the refurbishment of Mechanical and Electrical components.

R27 685 929.09

Free Sate

Parys

Ngwathe

Refurbishment of ParysWaste Water Treatment Works.

Refurbishment of WWTW (Mechanical and Electrical)

R2 450 308.16

Northern Cape

Warrenton

Magareng

Refurb of Warrenton WWTW

Refurbishment

R 10 77 712

Northern Cape

Barkly West

Dikgatlong

Refurb of Barkly West WWTW

Refurbishment

R 14 592 052

Northern Cape

Douglas

Siyancuma

Refurb of Douglas WWTW

Refurbishment

R 23 367 715

Northern Cape

Olifantshoek

Gamagara

Refurb of Olifantshoek

Refurbishment

R 12 925 769

Northern Cape

Dibeng

Gamagara

Refurb of Dibeng WWTW

Refurbishment

R 10 108 813

Mpumalanga

Ermelo

Ermelo

(Mpumalanga)

Refurb of Ermelo WWTW

Upgrade

R 44 275 029.44

Gauteng

Leekuil

Leekuil(Vaal)

Refurb of Leekuil WWTW

Refurbishment

R 36 417 498.79

Mpumalanga

Standerton

Standerton

Refurb of Standerton WWTW

Refurbishment

R 14 502 308.22

Gauteng

Vaal Marina

Vaal Marina

Refurb of Vaal Marina WWTW

Refurbishment

R 7 951 441.09

---00O00---

13 September 2017 - NW1997

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Does her department have documentation of all water infrastructures that existed before 1994; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) did her department conduct water infrastructure audits since 1994; if not why not; if so; (3) did the specified audit or survey include water infrastructure of the former Bantustans; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1) Yes, the asset register of my Department contains that information of all infrastructures that existed before 1994.

(2) Yes, in 2007, my Department launched a project called “verification and valuation of all major water resource infrastructure” and produced an asset register. On an annual basis, verification is performed mainly to include assets that were not included in the 2007 verification exercise.

(3) Yes, the verification and valuation exercise of 2007 included all national water resource infrastructures including the former Bantustan water infrastructure.

---00O00---

13 September 2017 - NW1666

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)Whether the Motau task team which was established by her to investigate procurement transgressions has finalised its work; if not, by what date will the task team finalise its work; if so, what are the relevant details of the findings; (2) whether she will furnish Ms T E Baker with a copy of the specified task team’s report; if not, why not; if so, by what date?

Reply:

Yes, the Motau Task Team has finalised its work. I am still reviewing the findings of the report and will furnish Parliament with the report in due course.

---00O00---

05 September 2017 - NW2303

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)(a) What are the names of the deputy Directors-General in her department who are currently under suspension, (b) what are the reasons for their suspension and (c) what measures have been put in place to ensure that their directorates continue to function smoothly; (2) with reference to the undertaking made by her department in the portfolio committee meeting on 10 May 2017, will her department be able to deliver on its deadline for the publication of the Draft National Water and Sanitation Bill in August 2017?

Reply:

(1)(a) Currently the Deputy Director General under suspension is Mr Anil Singh.

(1)(b) Following allegations of misconduct by the Deputy Director-General, the Director-General decided to apply a precautionary suspension in terms of Chapter 7 of the SMS Handbook of the manager concerned pending an investigation into such allegations.

(1)(c) Arising from the suspension, the Director-General appointed a senior manager in an acting capacity as Deputy Director-General: Regulation whose responsibility it is to perform all the functions, duties and delegations pertaining to the post.

 

(2) No, the date for the publication of the Draft National Water and Sanitation Bill in August 2017 cannot be met due to the following:

The Bill was presented to the ESEID cluster on 19 July 2017, requesting approval for submission to Cabinet for Cabinet to approve the publication of the Bill in the government gazette for public comment.

The cluster recommended further consultation with all other government departments being members of both the ESEID and SPCHD clusters. The further consultation took place on 10 August 2017 and the Bill will be resubmitted to the cluster at the date to be specified. Only after Cabinet has approved, the Bill will be gazetted for public comments.

---00O00---

05 September 2017 - NW2348

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether Magalies Water is paying for any courses or further studies of its (a) Chief Operating Officer and/or (b) Chief Executive Officer; if so, in each case, (i) what are the relevant details, (ii) at which institutions, (iii) what are the costs of the courses and/or studies and (iv) for what period of time?

Reply:

Yes, Magalies Water is paying for courses or further studies for the Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Executive Officer for a Senior Executive Program-Africa: Harvard Business School in collaboration with Gordon Institute of Business Science. The total cost of the courses is R326 542.50 each (US$25,000/person) for the period 31/07/2017 to 01/12/2017. Below are further details regarding the courses as follows:

The Senior Executive Program-Africa is aimed at building exceptional leaders in the African continent. Harvard Business School Executive Education offers the Senior Executive Program - Africa, in partnership with the Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) of Pretoria University in South Africa. It is designed to strengthen the leadership skills and build insight into local, regional, and global markets, the program explores the proven approaches of successful leaders in Africa and around the globe, preparing participants to compete effectively, seize the region's many growth opportunities, and sustain success for one’sorganisation.

The 2017 offering comprises a module in Kigali from 13 August to 18 August 2017; an independent work module from August 2017 to November 2017; and a module on the Harvard Business School campus in Boston from 26 November to 01 December 2017. It is intended to help participants build the knowledge, perspective, and confidence needed to lead more effectively and accelerate the company's growth. Participants also have the opportunity to share insights and learn from other senior leaders across Africa.

---00O00---

05 September 2017 - NW2304

Profile picture: Khawula, Ms MS

Khawula, Ms MS to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Other than the recognition of the importance and value of South Africa’s strategic water source areas in the National Water Resources Strategy 2, what is her department doing to ensure that the water source areas are given effective legal protection through the National Water Act, Act 36 of 1998?

Reply:

Chapter 3 of the National Water Act, 1998 makes provision for the protection of water resources. As part of protecting the water resources, the Minister is required to determine water resource classes and Resource Quality Objectives. The water source areas will therefore be protected by ensuring that they are prioritized for protection when determining the water resource classes and resource quality objectives. Once the class of a water resource and the resource quality objectives have been determined they are binding on all authorities and institutions when exercising any power or performing any duty under the National Water Act, 1998. The Department has regulatory measures in place, which include monthly water quality monitoring programmes in order to ensure that the levels of protection are maintained and any transgressors are dealt with accordingly.

---00O00---

05 September 2017 - NW2060

Profile picture: Cebekhulu, Inkosi RN

Cebekhulu, Inkosi RN to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

What is her department doing to stop the (a) contamination of our water supply such as rivers by municipalities and (b) flow of old motor oil from the notorious pavement mechanics into our water supply?

Reply:

 

(a) After communicating the Green Drop Progress Report Results of 2014, my Department prioritized 260 systems that are put under regulatory surveillance to monitor progress and reduction of risks identified in the report. Our Compliance team has audited 17 treatment works during this year (2017). Treatment works that do not comply are dealt with through Administrative Enforcement. This year, the Department of Water and Sanitation as well as the Department of Environmental Affairs will be conducting joint operations for certain priority treatment works.

(b) This specific form of pollution falls under the mandate of the National Department of Water and Sanitation, the Provincial Department of Environment (Waste and Pollution) as well as Local Government (Pollution and Storm Water Management). The Department's Directorate: Water Services Sector Development regularly updates model by-laws and shared with the Water Services Authorities to fine tune according to their municipal set up and industries/activities applicable in their area of operation and promulgated by respective council for implementation. Due to possible overlapping of mandates, my Department has not to date had an operation/project to raise awareness to address this matter. It will be tabled at Outcome 10 working group IV where the relevant parties can deliberate and bring a pragmatic plan of action to the table.

---00O00---

21 August 2017 - NW2216

Profile picture: Majola, Mr TR

Majola, Mr TR to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

Whether, with reference to her replies to question 208 on 24 February 2017 and question 866 on 19 April 2017, the assessment that was conducted jointly by Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and Rand Water was completed in May 2017; if not, (a) why not and (b) on what date will it be completed; if so, will she make a full copy of the assessment available to Mr T R Majola?

Reply:

Request the Honourable Member to refer to the response to NA 1173 on 12 May 2017 which was adequately responded to and see Annexure A for details of the report on the assessment.

---00O00---

21 August 2017 - NW1173

Profile picture: Esau, Mr S

Esau, Mr S to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

With regard to her reply to question 208 on 24 February 2017, what was the outcome of the joint assessment undertaken by her department and the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality?

Reply:

The joint assessment initiated by both Ekurhuleni and Rand Water revealed that Rand Water did not disturb the storm water infrastructure whilst laying the new pipeline. It should be noted that the joint assessment undertaken did not include my Department but was undertaken by Rand Water and the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality.

Furthermore, requesting the Honourable Member to refer the question to the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, who is in a better position to respond to issues relating to the plans going forward by the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality in Gauteng.

---00O00---

14 August 2017 - NW1447

Profile picture: Waters, Mr M

Waters, Mr M to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)When did Rand Water (a) start with maintenance work on their G28 concrete pipeline and (b) inform the Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality about the pending work; (2) whether she will furnish Mr M Waters with a copy of the letter to this effect; if not, why not; if so, by what date?

Reply:

(1)(a) Rand Water conducted a conditional assessment on the G28 and the entire network from the 8 to the 14 May 2017.

(1)(b) Yes, Rand Water did inform Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality of the condition assessment to be carried out at G28 pipeline.

(2) Refer to Annexure A for the copy of the email that informed Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality of the condition assessment to be carried out at G28 pipeline.

---00O00---

14 August 2017 - NW1664

Profile picture: Baker, Ms TE

Baker, Ms TE to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

With reference to her reply to question 909 on 24 April 2017, (a) what is the total number of service level agreements that have been finalised with municipalities that are in arrears with the various water boards, (b) what are the names of the municipalities and (c) what is the total amount owed by each municipality as at 31 March 2017?

Reply:

(a) There are a total of 47 service level agreements that have been finalised with municipalities that are in arrears with various water boards.

(b) Refer to Annexure A for the names of municipalities.

(c) Refer to Annexure A for the total amount owed by each municipality as at 31 March 2017.

---00O00---

14 August 2017 - NW1601

Profile picture: Mente, Ms NV

Mente, Ms NV to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(a) What percentage of her department’s budget was allocated towards drought relief in the current financial year and (b) what amount was allocated for the Western Cape?

Reply:

(a) My Department does not have a budget allocation for drought relief in the 2017/18 financial year.

(b) There is no amount allocated for Western Cape towards drought relief in the 2017/18 financial year.

 

---00O00---

14 August 2017 - NW1146

Profile picture: Basson, Mr LJ

Basson, Mr LJ to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)(a) How many employment positions does the Office of her department’s Director-General currently have, (b)(i) how many of the specified positions are currently vacant and (ii) why, (c) how many of the specified positions have appointed persons on an acting basis and (d) what are the names of each person employed in the specified office; (2) Whether any positions in the specified office were declared redundant since 1 April 2016; if so, why and (b) which positions were affected; (3) Whether she will furnish Mr L J Basson with copies of the specified office’s detailed organogram?

Reply:

(1)(a) The Office of Director-General currently has a total of forty four (44) employment positions.

(1)(b) A total of twenty one (21) positions are currently vacant within the office of the Director-General. Refer to the table below.

No

(1)(b)(i) Title of the vacant post

(1)(b)(ii) Reason why post still vacant

1

Director: Office of the DG

Post was advertised and put on hold until the DG was appointed

2

Head: Strategy & Operations

Advertised closed 25/11/2016

3

CD: Support Services

Advertised closed 17/06/2016

4

Assistant Director : Ministerial Enquiries

Advertised in June 2017

5

Language Practitioner

Advertised in June 2017

6

Deputy Director CPT

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

7

Water and Sanitation Advisory Service

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

8

ASD: Administration

Advertised closed 25/11/2016

9

Office Manager

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

10

Personal Assistant

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

11

Head : Water Sector Partnerships IGC and Corporate Communication

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

12

Office Manager

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

13

Personal Assistant

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

14

Personal Assistant

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

15

ASD: Office of the DG (secretary)

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

16

Driver /Messenger

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

17

Messenger

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

18

Director : Policy & Stakeholder Management

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

19

Deputy Director : Stakeholder Liaison and Parliamentary Co-Ordination

Advertised closed 25/11/2016

20

Parliamentary Officer

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

21

ASD : Fosad Cluster and Policy Co-Ordination

Not regarded as priority post as a result of budget cuts

(1)(c) A total of two (2) positions have appointed persons on an acting capacity.

(1)(d) Refer to Annexure A for the names and positions of each person employed in the office of the Director-General.

(2) All positions in the office of Director-General are still relevant, no positions were declared redundant since 1 April 2016.

(3) Refer to Annexure A for a detailed organogram for the office of Director-General.

---00O00---