Questions & Replies: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

Share this page:
2010-08-20

Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Ministerial Replies to MPs' Questions: July - December 2010)

THIS FILE CONTAINS 25 REPLIES.

FIND THE REPLY YOU ARE LOOKING FOR BY SELECTING CTRL + F ON YOUR KEYBOARD

QUESTION 3568

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 29 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 34 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

3568. Dr J C Kloppers-Lourens (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

What (a) are the threats that have been identified by her department with regard to the impact of climate change and (b) initiatives to promote adaptation to climate change is her department involved in? NW4408E

REPLY

(a) DAFF's draft Climate Change Sector Plan has identified threats such as increasing frequencies of natural disasters such as drought, floods, etc and diseases which may affect the agricultural production. Climate change will result in food insecurity, notably in rural areas. The impact of climate change particularly at grassroots level is noticed in terms of deficiencies in food production. Shortage of water, food and changing spread of diseases factors will all lead to greater health and life risk. Agricultural crop yields are also expected to be affected by changes in climate in terms of precipitation, temperature and CO2 levels. However an ongoing research is currently being carried out by DAFF to identify the main drivers of climate variability and change.

(b) DAFF is currently publishing an Atlas of Climate Change for the Agricultural sector following the research commissioned by the department on mitigation and adaptation options for agricultural production. In order to ensure the sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources, the department is developing and implementing climate change adaption and mitigation plans/strategies with a view to reduce the climate change impacts in the sector. Other initiatives include raising awareness on climate change, identifying vulnerable farming groups within the sector as well as facilitating the implementation of disaster risk management system by compiling and disseminating climate advisories as well as daily extreme weather warnings to farming communities.

QUESTION 3508

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 26 NOVEMBER 2010 [IQP No 39 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

DR L L BOSMAN (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

(1) Whether (a) her department and (b) any entities reporting to her department provided any financial support to the National Youth Development Agency (NYDA) for the World Festival of Youth and Students to be held in Pretoria in December 2010; if not, why not; if so, (i) what amount was provided to the NYDA, (ii) from which budget were these funds drawn, (iii) who made the decision to provide these funds to the NYDA and (iv) how is this (aa) decision and (bb) amount justified;

(2) whether the NYDA made any other request to (a) her department and (b) any entities reporting to her department to provide support to the festival; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details? NW4347E

REPLY:

(1) (a) DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES (DAFF)

The National Youth Development Agency (NYDA), through the Presidency, has requested support from DAFF in the form of promotional material on agriculture, forestry and fisheries for educational purposes for the youth festival. The request is being considered in consultation with the relevant SOEs. No requests for financial support have been received in this regard.

(b) AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (ARC)

The ARC hasn't received any request for financial or any other support from the NYDA and therefore the ARC has not provided any financial support in this regard.

NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COUNCIL (NAMC)

The NAMC hasn't received any request for financial or any other support from the NYDA and therefore the NAMC has not provided any financial support in this regard.

ONDERSTEPOORT BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (OBP), NCERA FARMS (PTY) LTD AND MARINE LIVING RESOURCES FUND (MLRF)

All these SOEs have not received any request for financial or any other support from the NYDA and therefore have not provided any financial support in this regard.

QUESTION 3460

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 26 NOVEMBER 2010 [IQP No 39 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

Question 3460 for written reply: National Assembly, Dr LL Bosman (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

(a) How many employees of (i) her department and (ii) any entities reporting to her department who are on salary level 11 salary scale and above have been suspended with full pay (aa) in the 2009-10 financial year and (bb) during the period 1 April 2010 up to the latest specified date for which information is available and (b) what is the total amount of money that was paid by her department in respect of these salaries? NW4295E

REPLY:

(aa)(i) 3

(aa)(ii) 0

(bb) 0

(b) R170 157

PERISHABLE PRODUCTS EXPORT CONTROL BOARD (PPECB)

aa) No suspensions for 2009/2010

bb) Period 1 April 2010 to date, one employee was suspended at PPECB for the period of one month during which time her disciplinary hearing took place.

b) The total costs to company (for the month) was R43000.

QUESTION 3444

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 26 NOVEMBER 2010 [IQP No 39 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

Question 3444 for written reply: National Assembly, Dr LL Bosman (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

With reference to predators such as jackals and mongoose which breed in nature reserves and then cause damage to the herds of stock farmers, what measures has her department put in place to (a) control the breeding of such animals and (b) limit the loss of stock and food security? NW4278E

REPLY

The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Agriculture (DAFF) appreciates the concerns of the Farming community in relation to carnivores causing damage to herds. However the mandate to control or assist with the control of such carnivores does not belong to DAFF.

The DAFF coordinates its efforts with the Department of Environmental Affairs in terms of research and methods used to control populations and thereby limit the impact in terms of loss of stock.

QUESTION 3431

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 26 NOVEMBER 2010 [IQP No 39 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

MR N SINGH (IFP) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

Whether certain organisations (details furnished) received any grants or funding from her department; if so, (a) which organisations, (b) when and (c) what was the purpose of these grants or funding? NW4270E

REPLY:


No transfer payments were made by the Department to the organisations for which details were furnished.

QUESTION 3407

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 19 NOVEMBER 2010 [IQP No 38 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

Question Mrs S V Kalyan (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and

Fisheries:

(1) (a) What is the latest allocated total allowable catch (TAC) for the West Coast rock lobster fishery, (b) what is the breakdown of this TAC in respect of (i) commercial fishing, (ii) recreational fishing and (iii) interim relief allocation, (c) how do each of these allocated figures compare with the allocated figures in 2009, (d) how can the decrease in figures that have dropped since 2009 be justified, (e) what is the total number of persons that will benefit from the interim relief allocation and (f) what are the dates on which these fishermen are allowed to fish in terms of this interim relief allocation;

(2) Whether a consultation process was held with representatives of the recreational fishing sector prior to the announcement of the TAC; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW4245E

Reply:

(1)(a) A global TAC of 2 286.22 tons has been determined for the 2010/11 West Coast Rock Lobster fishing season.

(1)(b) The global TAC has been apportioned as follows:

Commercial Fishing (Offshore) : 1 528.22 (previously 1632 tons)

Commercial Fishing (Near-shore) : 451 tons (previously 451 tons)

Recreational Fishing : 107 tons (previously 257 but should have been reduced to 129.7 tons to accommodate Interim Relief)

Interim Relief Measure : 200 tons (previously 53 tons but should have been 180 tons)

(1)(c) See (b) above

(1)(d) Reduction in global TAC as per scientific recommendation

(1)(e) A maximum of 1500

(1)(f) 15 November to 15 April

(2) Yes. Representatives of the recreational fishing sector attend scientific working group meetings

QUESTION 3366

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 19 NOVEMBER 2010 [IQP No 38 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

Mr R N Cebekhulu (IFP) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

(1) Whether the consignments of her department's mechanisation programme have been delivered to the provinces; if not, why not; if so, (a) to which districts in each province and (b) what are the details of each consignment;

(2)(a) who bears the cost of diesel and oil to run the machines and (b) what arrangements have been made to maintain these machines?NW4196E

REPLY:

1) The mechanization consignments were successfully delivered to the Kwazulu Natal and Mpumalanga provinces.

1a) The equipment was delivered to the provincial management which, in turn, distributed them throughout their provinces based on their provincial plans. The agricultural extension support offices that function within local municipalities will support the various projects and programmes related to agriculture.

1b) There were 85 tractors with implements delivered to Kwazulu Natal and Mpumalanga Provinces. The agricultural engineers and extension officers in the provinces indicated the needs of individual projects and the distribution was made accordingly.

2a) The agriculture assistance and support, through the extension offices, is an ongoing service from agriculture. Ordinarily, budgeting for fuel and oils is covered by this section within the provinces. As a result no budget for diesel and oil was required for the new equipment. This equipment is seen as an extension of the existing Provincial contribution to agriculture assistance for small farmers.

2b) The manufacturer indicated his approved dealers and distributors and service providers were appointed according to the manufacturer's information regarding warranty repairs and services. The normal procurement and asset management procedures within the Provinces were applied. These service providers will maintain the equipment during mechanical breakdowns and they will also conduct the normal 250hr service schedules on the equipment. Supervision of the maintenance will be controlled and monitored through the extension offices.

QUESTION 3295

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2010 [IQP No 37 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

Question 3295 for written reply: National Assembly, Mrs S V Kalyan (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

(1) Whether her department will take any action against municipalities that spray rubigan and tilt fungicides and pesticides within residential areas; if not, why not; if so, what action;

(2) whether her department advises municipalities on the appropriate use of fungicides and pesticides within residential areas; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

(3) what are the (a) names, (b) designations and (c) contact numbers in each province of the officials in her department who are mandated to receive complaints from the public about the incorrect use of fungicides?

NW4118E

REPLY

1. The products, Rubigan EC, L5228 and Tilt, EC L6668 are registered in terms of the Fertilizers, Farm Feeds, Agricultural Remedies Act, 1947 (Act No. 36 of 1947). Both products are registered as fungicides to be used on ornamentals and various agricultural crops. All products that are registered in terms of the said Act have a label, which gives directions on how and where the products should be used. As long as products are used in the manner specified on the label, the use of such products will be within the law. The Department is not aware of specific complaints brought to its attention regarding the use of Rubigan EC, L5228 and Tilt, EC L6668 by the Municipalities.

2. The Department does advice any sphere of government, parastatals and the general public regarding the use of any pesticides and or fungicides. From time to time the department conducts awareness campaigns with the aim of informing pesticide users, regarding the correct use, handling and storage. The Department also partners with NGOs like the Chemicals Crime Management Forums, SPCA and Universities regarding the management of pesticide and fungicide use.

3. The said Act is administered at national level, and as such all matters relating to regulation of pesticides are handled by the Office of the Registrar: Act 36 of 1947. The Office of the Registrar has a designated inspectorate that deals with any complaints at provincial level.

Below are the contact details where complaints can be forwarded:

Dr B Ntshabele, Director: Food Safety and Quality Assurance: Tel. 012 319 7304/06

Mr Jonathan Mudzunga, Registrar: Act 36 of 1947, Tel. 012 319 7303

Mr Gift Moncho, Head of Inspection, Tel. 012 319 7169

Ms Melani Rispel, Tel. 051409 2628 (Free State and Northern Cape Provinces)

Mr Anton Nothnagel, Tel 021948 9278 (Western Cape and Eastern Cape Provinces

Mr Maganyele Masenya, Tel. 012 319 7226 (KZN, Limpopo, Gauteng, North West, and Mpumalanga Provinces

QUESTION 3262

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2010 [IQP No 37 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

Question 3262 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr. N D du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

What progress has been made with regard to consolidating her department's funding programmes to ensure increased (a) sectoral equity, (b) participation and (c) ownership by previously disadvantaged individuals (details furnished)? NW4078E

REPLY:

a & b) A Development Finance Branch has been formed where all these funding programmes will be managed. This single team will ensure that each fund leverages on another and that they complement one another. But more importantly, it will ensure that partnerships with other financiers (e.g. Land Bank, MAFISA Intermediaries etc) are forged to grow the agricultural sector. The establishment of a One Stop Development Fund, which will provide supplementary capital (grant), is at an advanced stage and this should be realised in the 2012 financial year

c) The department has made an Equity Fund available, which will be used to fund the equity stake in farming businesses for previously disadvantaged individuals and companies. In order to expedite the disbursement of the current balance of the AgriBEE Equity Fund, the Department and the Land Bank have concluded a new Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) for the AgriBEE Fund and also revised AgriBEE Fund Operational Manual.

QUESTION 3261

DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 12 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 34 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

Question 3261 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr. N D du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

a) What was the total budgeted amount that was set aside for the 2010-11 financial year for the (i) mechanisation programme (ii) rehabilitation of irrigation infrastructure

b) How much has been spent on each since 1 April 2010 (ii) in which provinces

c) What are the relevant details of these projects

REPLY:

a) (i) The total budget that was set aside for mechanisation for 2010/11 was R50 million per province.

(ii) R55 million was set aside for the revitalisation of 3 irrigation schemes namely Taung, Makhatini and Vaalharts though the Ilima-Letsema funds.

b) (i) (a) R100 million was spent on Mechanisation

(b) R12.8 million was spent on irrigation

c) (ii) (a) Mechanisation in Mpumalanga and Kwa-Zulu Natal

(ii) (b) Irrigation in Kwa-Zulu Natal, North West and Northern Cape

d) Progress/status report per irrigation scheme:

Makhatini Irrigation Scheme ( Kwa-Zulu Natal)

Budget: R 30 million

The following maintenance and administrative work has been done:

  • Administrative fee R60 000
  • Repair & clearing of canals & formalization of stock
  • watering points R400 000

    • Replacement of pumps, electric motors

    and purchase of equipment R 409 000

    Total R8 690 000

    Balance R29 131 000

    Outstanding work

  • Repairs to reticulation pipelines and fittings
  • Spares and materials to shorten time for repairs
  • Earthmoving machinery required for excavation of pipelines
  • and maintenance of roads (tip trailer)

    • Repair to the gravelling of roads

    Taung irrigation Scheme (North West)

    Budget: 20 million

    The following maintenance work was done:

    Maintenance of the irrigation pivots R2 365 million

    Repair of water canal, repair of diesel

    Pump unit and repair of pivot motor R9 625 million

    Total R11 990 million

    Balance R8 010 000

    Outstanding work

  • Dismantling and erection of centre pivots,
  • supply and installation of irrigation system on 50 hectares
  • and production inputs
  • Vaalharts irrigation Scheme u (Northern Cape)

    Budget: R5 million

    There is currently no expenditure incurred for the Vaalharts Irrigation scheme. The Northern Cape Department of Agriculture have advised that they have recently completed the tendering stages and service provider has been allocated and implementation will begin November 2010.

    Outstanding work

    · to re-build and seal 6 irrigation reservoirs, and

  • install sub-surface drainage systems on 14 farms
  • QUESTION 3260

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY, 19 NOVEMBER 2010

    Question 3260 Mr N D du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and

    Fisheries:

    (1) How many of her 8000 employees that have been earmarked for receiving information and communication technology (ICT) have been provided with ICT infrastructure to date;

    (2) Whether the target of 2000 employees per quarter has been reached; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW4076E

    REPLY:

    1. Total Staff number for DAFF as at 31 October 2010, provided by Directorate: Human Resource Management (DHRM) is:

    Agriculture = 3 284

    Fisheries = 738

    Forestry = 3 002

    TOTAL = 7024

    Vacancies = 748

    The total number of connected officials and have infrastructure are:

    Agriculture = 3 284

    Fisheries = 644

    Forestry = 406

    TOTAL = 4344

    Though the target of 2 000 employees was set as a baseline after the investigation it was found out that the bulk of Forestry officials are labourers, that work outside in the plantations and are not office bound. This number is ± 2 100. The last remaining sites ie. 30 plantations in Eastern Cape, 7 plantations in Limpopo and 7 plantations in KwaZulu/Natal will be prioritised in the next financial as some of these identified plantations do not have electricity and any telecommunication facilities. About 11 sites were identified as Phase 2 of Forestry ICT migration cutover will be connected by end of Quarter 4 (March 2011),

    As for Fisheries, 5 outstanding Fisheries officials will be connected by end of November 2010.

    In a nutshell the target has been met, except in the areas indicated above.

    QUESTION 3216

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 12 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 37 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    3216. Dr L L Bosman (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    What is the (a) total cost and (b) number of copies of each (i) annual report and (ii) report on strategic plans that was produced by (aa) her department and (bb) any of its entities in the 2009-10 financial year? NW4030E

    REPLY

    (aa) Reports: Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

    (i) Annual report

    What is the (a) total cost: R127 210,35

    (b) number of copies: 2 000

    (ii) Strategic plan

    What is the (a) total cost: R95 703,84

    (b) number of copies: 3 000

    (bb) Reports: Entities

    1. Agricultural Research Council (ARC)

    (i) Annual report

    What is the (a) total cost: R363 645,00

    (b) number of copies: 1 000 (hard copies)

    : 1 500 (CDs)

    (ii) Strategic plan

    What is the (a) total cost: R55 385,00

    (b) number of copies: 600

    2. Marine Living Resources Fund (MLRF)

    (i) Annual report

    What is the (a) total cost: R49 760,00

    (b) number of copies: 400

    (ii) Strategic plan

    What is the (a) total cost: R1 570,00

    (b) number of copies: 50

    3. National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC)

    (i) Annual report

    What is the (a) total cost: R76 265,10

    (b) number of copies: 200 (hard copies)

    : 200 (CDs)

    (ii) Strategic plan

    None

    4. Ncera Farms Pty Ltd

    (i) Annual report

    What is the (a) total cost: R2 075,00

    (b) number of copies: 50

    (ii) Strategic plan

    What is the (a) total cost: R1 320,00

    (b) number of copies: 100

    5. Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP)

    (i) Annual report

    What is the (a) total cost: R49 291,00

    (b) number of copies: 310

    QUESTION 3187

    Question 3187 Ms D. Carter (COPE) to ask the Minister for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

    (1) Whether the Department is actively counteracting the threat to food production

    and food security emanating from the severe pollution of streams and rivers by mining effluent; if not, why not; if so, what measures have been put in place and to what effect is her department interacting with the Department of Water Affairs to remedy the situation;

    (2) What steps has her department taken to allay the concerns of the European

    Union regarding grain imports from South Africa because of the toxicity of water NW3997E

    REPLY

    (1) The legislation for mitigation of the impact on water pollution by mining activities

    and other activities lies within the mandates of the Department of Water Affairs and the Department of Mineral Resources. The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries participates in the various forums that the two Departments have established and provides advice on issues relating to the threat to food production and food security by these activities.

    (2) The grain crops which South Africa exports is mainly maize which is mainly exported to African countries. It must also be noted that, 80-90% of this maize is grown in areas which practises dry land/ rain-fed agriculture. In addition, according to international research, the uptake of heavy metals by plant organs such as fruit and seeds (grains included) is minimal due to their low transpiration rates and the fact that they are largely phloem-loaded thus rendering heavy metals generally poorly mobile in the phloem. Thus polluted water is not a serious problem in terms of production of grain crops.

    QUESTION 3119

    MR N.D. DU TOIT (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF AGRICUL TURE1 FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

    (a)(i) How much of the (aa) approximately R22 million that has been budgeted for the construction of new buildings and (bb) R5 million that has been set aside for repairs has been spent and (ii) how much work has been done and (b) what are the relevant details of these projects? NW3919E

    REPL Y:

    (a)(i) (aa) The Department had to reprioritise its Capital Works budget allocation to provide for office space for Forestry officials at Head Office (Pretoria) and therefore the amount of R15 million, inclusive of construction and repairs, is available.

    (bb) R6 254 million

    (ii) Almost 50% finalised

    (b)(i) Project details: Attached as separate document

    (ii) Summary: Attached as separate document

    QUESTION 3076

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 29 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 34 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 3076 for written reply: National Assembly, Mr. M J Ellis (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    1. Whether she has taken any measures to regulate the use of the pesticide, chlorpyrifos; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    2. Whether she has received any representations to ban chlorpyrifos; if so, what are the relevant details;

    3. Whether she intends banning chlorpyrifos; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW3800E

    REPLY

    1. Given the health risks associated with the use of Chlorpyrifos, the sale and use of products containing Chlorpyrifos as an active ingredient for home, garden and domestic use is banned by the Minister (see gazette No. 33171 of dated 14 May 2010)

    2. About two years ago the Department initiated a process to review the use of Chlorpyrifos. The public were invited to make comments and various comments were received from the pesticide industry, agrochemical industry, individuals, and Legal resource centres. On the 05th February 2010, a workshop was called to discuss the comments received. At the workshop, it was agreed that sale and use of Chlorpyrifos in the household, home garden and domestic market must be banned.

    3. As indicated above, the banned is restricted to household, home garden and domestic market, while the use of Chlorpyrifos for agricultural purpose is still allowed. The Department has not decided to extend the ban to include agricultural use as the Department's view is that the risk posed by Chlorpyrifos for agriculture purpose is manageable. However, the Department will continue monitoring if such risk remained manageable.

    QUESTION 3053

    DATE OF PUBLICA TION

    Question 3053 Mrs S V Kalyan (DA) to' ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) Whether, since her reply to question 2039 on 16 August 2010, the investigation has been completed; if not why not; if s0, what was the outcome of the investigation;

    (2) whether any action has been taken against any officials as the results of the investigation, if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details.;

    (3) whether the report has been made public; if not, why not; if so, where can it be accessed? NW3173E

    REPLY

    The matter referred to is still under investigation by the South African Police Services (SAPS) and the Department. It is therefore not possible to disclose any details relating to the matter as this may compromise the investigation. Upon completion of the investigation, a full report can be made available.

    QUESTION 3039

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 29 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 34 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 3039 for written reply: National Assembly, Dr LL Bosman (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) Whether, with reference to various charges brought against a certain chief executive officer (CEO) (name furnished) of a certain institution (name furnished), his services will be terminated, as recommended by an independent hearing, the disciplinary committee and the Board; if not why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (2) whether the CEO was put on paid suspension; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) for how long has he been suspended and (b) what is the total amount of remuneration he has received since being suspended;

    (3) whether, considering that an acting CEO has been appointed, the continued wasteful compensation to the CEO will be seized;

    (4) whether she intends reimbursing the institution for payments made to the suspended CEO; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW3759E

    REPLY

    (1) The Minister will have to consider the information presented to her by the Board and the court outcome, and if necessary will also give the CEO a hearing before deciding on whether or not to terminate his contract.

    (2) Yes, the CEO was on paid suspension since April 2010. Total remuneration is R800k as at November 2010.

    (3) The salary paid to the suspended CEO cannot legally be attached as he was entitled to this pending the Minister's decision

    (4) No, OPB is an entity that has to follow prescribed regulations in dealing with perceived misconduct and the organisation has to bare all costs associated if it decided to follow such a processes for any of its staff members including the CEO. In short, OPB is an independent company and has to meet all its financial responsibilities/obligations and account for that according to the PFMA.

    QUESTION 3028

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 29 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 34 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 3028 Mr N D du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    Whether she will allow harvesting in marine protected areas (MPAs); if so, (a) in which MPAs, (b) how will this be (i) controlled and (ii) monitored and (c) what financial resources will be made available for this harvesting? NW3746E


    REPLY

    No,

    (a) N/A

    (b) (i)(ii) N/A

    (c) N/A

    QUESTION 3027

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: WEDNESDAY 27 OCTOBER 2010 [lQP No 30 -20101 SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 3027 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr N D du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) Whether she has undertaken any international trips since assuming office; if so, in each case, (a) how many and (b) what was the (I) destination, (Ii) reason and (Hi) cost of each of these trips;

    (2) whether any officials of her department will be travelling to (a) Paris, France, (b) Anchorage, Alaska and (c) Hobart, Tasmania; if so, in each case, (i) how many officials will be undertaking the trip, (Ii) what are their names, (iii) what is the purpose of the trip and (iv) what benefit will be derived from the trip? NW3745E

    REPLY:

    MINISTERIAL INTERNATIONAL VISIT TABLE (PARUMANTARY RESPONSE) IS ATTACHED

    QUESTION 3026

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 29 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 34 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 3026 for written reply: National Assembly, Mr N D du Toit(DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    Whether she has visited any facilities since taking office; if not, (a) why not and (b) when does she intend to visit facilities; if so, (i) what facilities and (ii) on what date did she visit each specified facility? NW3744E

    REPLY

    The Minister has the Department that oversees all the State-Owned Enterprises on her behalf. It is virtually impractical for the Minister to visit all the State-Owned Enterprises, which are operational units of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and therefore, the Department has oversight thereof.

    On October 8, 2010 The Minister inaugurated the Board of Perishable Products Export Control Board, which happened at the offices of the ARC. Recently, on 22 November 2010, the day before their Strategic Planning session, the Minister met and addressed the Council of the Agricultural Research Council.

    The Minister has been in constant contact with the leadership of OBP, even and including during the strife there between the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. The Minister has refrained to support one side or another but has continued to call for a solution that will be good for the organisation rather than individuals.

    The Minister has proxies on all the above boards, and when she is personally not attending meetings, the proxies do so on her behalf.

    QUESTION 2932

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 22 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 32 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2932 for written reply: National Assembly, Mr I O Davidson (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (a) What (i) are the (aa) names and (bb) designations of the officials who attended the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources conference in Hobart, Australia in October 2010, (ii)(aa) was the total cost to her department and (bb) breakdown of these costs in respect of each item and service procured and (iii) is the reason for each official attending this conference and (b)(i) on what date was the conference previously held and (ii) how many officials attended the conference? NW3622E

    REPLY

    (a) There are three DAFF officials attending the meeting and three DEA officials. The names of the latter are Dr. Mayekiso, Dr. Makhado and Mr. Samai. There are no further details as the latter officials are in another Department.

    (aa) & (bb) The names and designations of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries officials attending CCAMLR are

    1. Dr Rob Leslie Marine scientist III

  • Purpose: Dr Leslie is representing Chief Directorate: Fisheries Research and is attending to advise on scientific research issues
    • Dates
    • 9-10 October 2010 From Cape Town to Hobart
    • 11-22 October 2010 Attending WG-FSA and Ad hoc TASO meetings
    • 25-29 October 2010 Attending Sc-CCAMLR meeting
    • 1 – 5 November 2010 attending CCAMLR meeting
    • Total Costs:
    • Return ticket per occasion R16 800 Economy
    • Accommodation 22 745
    • Daily allowance 27 624
    • Airport shuttle 668
    • Total Cost R67 437

    2. Mr Lisolomzi Fikizolo [Director: Fisheiries Patrol Vessels] & Mr. Phoebius Mullins [Assistant Director: Pelagic and High Seas Fisheries Management]

    • Purpose:
      • Mr Fikizolo represents the Chief Directorate: Monitoring, Control and Surveillance
      • Mr Mullins represents the Chief Directorate: Resource Management

    · Travelling Dates

    o 22-24October From Cape Town to Hobart

    o 25 -29 October 2010 : Attend SCIC and SCV_CCAMLR meetings

    o 1 -5 November 2010Attend commission Meeting

    o 7-8 November Travel from Hobart to Cape town

    Total Cost per person

    o Return economy class ticket R16 800

    o Accommodation 10 787

    o Daily allowance 14 258

    o Airport shuttle 668

    o Total 42 513x2

    (b) (i) & (b) (ii):

    o The previous meeting was on 12 October 2009, which four [4] officials attended.

    MEMORANDUM

    Date: 27 October 2010

    Re: QUESTION 2932.

    FOR WRITTEN REPLY, NATIONAL ASSEMBLY:

    ASKED TO THE MINISTER FOR AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

    Mr I O Davidson (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1 )Whether any forensic investigation was launched into her department's fisheries branch since 1 April 2010; if not, why not; if so, what (a) is the purpose of the investigation, (b) are the details of the entity that is conducting the investigation, (c) are the timelines of the investigation and (d) is the total budget for the investigation;

    (2) whether the results of the investigation will be made public; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

    The enclosed draft reply to the question for your approval should you agree with the contents thereof. The information was jointly supplied by the office of Dir. Fisheries Legal Services.

    (1). Yes

    (a) Investigation into allegations of fraud on allocation of export permits for Rock lobster

    (b). PriceWatercoopers

    (c). The investigation was conducted between the period of August and September 2010 (d). The total budget for the investigation was R70 000.00

    (2). No, this is due to further investigation which will be subsequent to the report submitted by the service provider entity.

    QUESTION 2931

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 22 OCTOBER 2010 [IQP No 32 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2931 for written reply: National Assembly, Mr I O Davidson (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1)Whether any forensic investigation was launched into her department's fisheries branch since 1 April 2010; if not, why not; if so, what (a) is the purpose of the investigation, (b) are the details of the entity that is conducting the investigation, (c) are the timelines of the investigation and (d) is the total budget for the investigation;

    (2) whether the results of the investigation will be made public; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW3621E

    REPLY

    (1) Yes

    (a) Investigation into allegations of fraud on allocation of export permits for Rocklobster

    (b) Price Waterhouse Coopers

    (c) The investigation was conducted between the period of August and September 2010

    (d) The total budget for the investigation was R70 000.00

    (2) No, this is due to further investigation which will be subsequent to the report submitted by the service provider entity.

    QUESTION 2719

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: THURSDAY 23 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 30 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2719 for written reply: National Assembly, Mr S J Masango (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

    (1)Whether tractors that were handed over on 17 June 2010 to the community of Dr J S Moroka Municipality at Marapyane in Mpumalanga were licensed; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (2) whether the Government bought the tractors and implements directly from the tractor dealer; if not, why not; if so, (a) from what dealer, (b) what was the total purchase price, (c) what is the breakdown of the price of the (i) tractors and (ii) implements and (d) when were the tractors and implements purchased? NW3388E

    REPLY:

    (1) The tractors are not registered yet. If it is not registered they cannot use them. The Mpumalanga middle management did not budget for the maintenance and running of the specific tractors. Therefore they are in the process of registering them to date.

    (2) (a) Rovic & Leers

    (b) R47,534,409.00 + R2,137,500 = R49 671 909.00

    An excess amount of R2,137,500 over and above the invoice amount of R47,534,409.00 was liable due to the fact that the units (tractors) originally allocated to the Department were sold during December and January as the deposit monies promised by the Department was not available. These units (tractors) are of a much higher spec and were the only units available within the given time frame.

    (c ) (i) R30 605 000.00

    (ii) R16 929 409.00

    (d) April 2010

    QUESTION 2651

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 17 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 29- 2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2651 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Dr L L Bosman (DA) to ask the Minister for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) Whether she received a dossier of complaints lodged by staff members of a certain state-owned company (name furnished) against a certain person (name furnished); if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details contained in the dossier;

    (2) whether the person is currently suspended with full pay; if so, (a) what are the reasons for his suspension, (b) how long has he been on suspension and (c) what is the total amount of remuneration paid to him during his suspension; if not,

    (3) whether the person has been formally dismissed; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what (a) process was followed in respect of his dismissal, (b) are the reasons for his dismissal and (c) are the further relevant details;

    (4) whether the person received payment of a settlement amount on termination of his employment; if so, (a) what was the amount paid and (b) what are the reasons for this payment;

    (5) whether an acting chief executive officer has been appointed in the interim; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW3308E

    REPLY:

    (1)Yes, a dossier was received as far as I am aware. The details of complaints cannot be divulged at this stage as they are various allegations which may be considered defamatory. Further, on receipt of the complaints, I requested on numerous occasions evidence to corroborate the allegations. This has not been forthcoming which is concerning. Therefore the allegations against the CEO cannot be made public.

    (2) I am aware that the CEO was suspended but such suspension has not been endorsed by myself. Therefore it is my view that the person ought not to have been suspended. I cannot comment on the reason and duration and further details of his suspension as it was done by the Board against my instructions. My concern is that the CEO ought not to be on suspension. I am informed that the CEO was suspended on 9th April 2010 and currently remains suspended.

    (3) The CEO has not been formally dismissed. The matter is now in court. The CEO is challenging the board's decision to suspend and charge him and to hold a disciplinary hearing. I have been cited as 3rd respondent due to the fact that the OBP is a State Owned Enterprise of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

    (4) N/A

    (5) I am informed that an acting Chief Executive Officer has been appointed.

    QUESTION 2628

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 17 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 29 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2628 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Ms D Carter (COPE) to ask the Minister for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (a) What steps is she taking to ensure that the agricultural sector grows to keep up with future demand and (b) what is her department's projected growth for agriculture over the next four years? NW3278E

    REPLY:

    a) To address the major social and economic challenges facing our country, the following five priority areas were identified for government and incorporated into the Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) for the next 5 years: Creation of decent work and sustainable livelihoods; education; health; crime prevention; and rural development, including land reform and food production and security. For the agriculture, forestry and fisheries sector the focus will be on accelerating delivery on food security, rural development linked to land reform and skills development. The sector's strategic priorities for the next 3 years will therefore be to:

    · Speed up economic growth and transform the economy to create decent work and sustainable livelihoods;

    · Roll out a massive programme to build economic and social infrastructure;

    · Strengthen the skills and human resource base of the sector;

    · Roll out a comprehensive rural development strategy linked to land and agrarian reform and food security; and

    · Pursue the advancement of Africa, enhance international cooperation and affirm that South Africa builds its competitiveness globally.

    Furthermore, the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) is taking a holistic approach aimed at establishing a strong foundation to enhance the competitiveness of the sector. It is against this background that DAFF is far advanced with its formulation of an integrated Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Sector Plan, which is undergoing extensive stakeholders consultation. The Plan recognizes the elimination of barriers and mitigation of risks that could potentially harm our competitiveness position internationally. It also considers the important creation of an enabling environment to allow farm, forestry and fisheries businesses to strive and become more profitable, and to be able to generate decent jobs and ensure equitable and sustainable economic growth in line with the MTSF priorities. Important elements of such a holistic strategy include, among others, agro-processing, agro-logistics, mechanization, infrastructure and research and development. Government across all its spheres, industry as well as labour, will become partners in ensuring that the implementation of the Sector Plan takes place successfully and will achieve maximum impact.

    b) The performance of the agricultural sector, which has command over relatively poor natural resources, is heavily influence by weather occurrences such as droughts. Agriculture is also highly exposed to global markets, as farmers receive few subsidies; international trade (imports and exports) makes up a large proportion of total production; and trade at the borders has been substantially liberalized. Hence farmers' incomes are highly dependant on movements in the exchange rate, and on global economic conditions. Therefore, it is not realistic to project growth rates over the next 4 years. However, the average growth rate of the agricultural sector over the last 3 years (based on gross output and valued at 2005 prices – as incorporated into the national accounting system of the country) was 0,1%. The average growth for field crops over the last 3 years was -4,98%, for horticulture it was 2,05% and for animal products (livestock) it averaged 2,08%. The expected growth rate for 2010 is between 0,8% and 1,0%, with a 1,1% growth for field crops, -2,5% for horticultural products and 2,1% for animal products. Although the agricultural sector has shown more resilience to the economic downturn than most other sectors, producer prices have declined rapidly and as a consequence real net farming income has declined. For example, in 2009, real net farming income declined by 12% and a further 10% is projected for 2010. Based on the assumption that the recovery in commodity prices will be dampened by the relative strength of the exchange rate and due to the fact that the impact of significant economic growth will take time to filter through the commodity markets, an average annual growth rate in real net farm income of 2,8% is projected over the next 4 years.

    QUESTION 2627

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 17 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 29 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2627 for written reply, National Assembly: Ms D. Carter (Cope) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    Whether, with reference to World Hunger's information on famine in Africa (details furnished), she has any plans to reduce the number of those afflicted with hunger; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

    NW3277E

    REPLY:

    Yes, the Department is currently reviewing plans to reduce the number of those afflicted with hunger.

    According to Stats SA (General Household Survey; 2007), about 6 million households are vulnerable to food insecurity, and over 72% of this population group resides in rural areas.

    The response to food insecurity is guided by the objectives of the approved (2002) Integrated Food Security Strategy, which has the following general objectives (managed through the Integrated Food Security and Nutrition Task Team):

    · Food production and trade – managed by DAFF

    · Nutrition security – managed by both the Departments of Health and Education

    · Social safety net and food emergencies – managed through the Department of Social Development

    · Food insecurity information – managed by DAFF in partnership with Stats SA

    The implementation is done in partnership with provincial departments and over the past 2 years more than 140 000 households have been assisted through the Household Food Production Program. It should, however, be noted that resources constraints decelerate the implementation rate.

    It is on this basis that DAFF is revisiting the implementation strategy which will increase the focus on hunger eradication in South Africa. The process of developing such a program is currently underway and pronouncements on this will be made in the near future.

    The 5-year plan below indicates the National Indices of Multiple Deprivation for South Africa (Stats SA) which are used to guide the implementation of interventions at a ward level:

    Year 1

    2011/12

    Year 2

    2012/13

    Year 3

    2013/14

    Year 4

    2014/15

    Year 5

    2015/16

    Total

    Number of wards

    108

    356

    345

    275

    108

    1 128

    Number of households

    215 290

    765 609

    1 071 240

    685 693

    215 290

    2 945 122

    Estimated number of household members

    725 500

    3 828 045

    5 356 456

    3 428 465

    725 500

    14 127 710

    QUESTION 2626

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 17 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 29 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2626 for written reply, National Assembly: Ms D. Carter (Cope) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    Whether her Department is implementing ecological agriculture to provide long-term sustainable food security; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

    NW3276E

    REPLY:

    1. Yes, the department is implementing ecological agriculture to provide for long term sustainable Food security.

    2. One of our key responsibilities of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries is to ensure sustainable management and use of natural resources. This is the reason why the Department is promoting the use of sustainable production systems in order to ensure long-term food security as well as production of other important agricultural products. Ecological agriculture is one of these production systems.

    3. Ecological agriculture refers to the practice of agriculture where production is maximised whilst minimising the use of external inputs and avoiding the pollution of natural resources. Agro-ecological farming is a whole-systems approach to food, feed, and fibre production that balances environmental soundness, social equity, and economic viability. It is based on the principle of farming in harmony with nature. In other words the production practices should not degrade the environment and have adverse impact on natural resources like water, soil as well as fauna and flora.

    4. Agro-ecological farming is based on the following:

  • The application of ecology to the design and management of sustainable agro-ecosystems.
  • A whole-systems approach to agriculture and food systems development based on traditional knowledge, alternative agriculture, and local food system experiences.
  • Linking ecology, culture, economics, and society to sustain agricultural production, healthy environments, and viable food and farming communities.
  • 5. The Integrated pest management is one of the practices used widely in South Africa and it uses ecosystems resilience and diversity for pest, disease and weed control. In addition integrated nutrient management is one of the practices used in agricultural production.

    6. Principles of agro-ecological agriculture are also included in the Policy on Organic Farming that the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries is developing. This policy will be published before the end of the current financial year. The purpose of this policy is to create a broad framework for the development of a prosperous organic farming sector that is globally competitive and capable of supporting government's commitments towards poverty alleviation, job creation, food security and economic development. The policy will also ensure a broader understanding of organic farming as well as ecological agriculture.

    There are several types of agro-ecological practices and resource – conserving technologies in South Africa that can be used to improve the stocks and use of natural capital and in and around agro-ecosystems.

    Conservation tillage which reduces the amount of tillage, sometime to zero so that soil can be conserved and available moisture used more effectively is one of the practices is used in Agriculture. Agro-forestry which incorporates multifunctional trees into agricultural systems and collective management of nearby resources is also practiced in South Africa. Aquaculture which incorporates fish , shrimps and other aquatic resources into farm systems such as integrated vegetable production, fish ponds and poultry production is also practiced in South Africa.

    The Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries will also be publishing the organic farming policy which will ensure a broader understanding of organic farming as well as ecological agriculture.

    QUESTION 2613

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 17 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 29 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2613 for written reply, National Assembly: Mr P.F. Smith (IFP) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) Whether it has been her Department's policy to permit game farming as a desirable agricultural practice in marginal lands; if not, why not; if so,

    (2) Whether her Department has promoted game farming in respect of such land; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so,

    (3) Whether game farming offers commercial potential also in respect of communal land; if not, why not; if so,

    (4) Whether her Department is promoting the commercial potential of game farming also in respect of communal land; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the further relevant details?

    NW3165E

    REPLY:

    (1) Yes it has been the intention of the Department to permit game farming, that is why DAFF has now developed a policy which promotes game farming in marginal lands. Game farming is often the best option in areas where conventional animal agriculture is not possible. Game farming is already recognized as a viable land use option in marginal areas.

    (2) The current policy to be published indicates that "Wildlife ranching (game farming) has the potential to provide four to seven times more job opportunities than normal livestock farming activities. However, the potential of the wildlife ranching sector to produce meat for food and income as well as additional income through breeding stock, agro-tourism, and value-added products and activities has received little attention to date, particularly with regard to rural communities with resources that could and often should be used for some form of wildlife ranching system as a more sustainable option." While interventions by Government and by local farmers could reverse this situation, establishing wildlife will require capital intensive interventions such as fencing and provision of water points. In addition in terms of animal diseases, the livestock and wild life interface will have to be managed properly. Such actions will also require specialized knowledge and other facts that are often overlooked. Therefore, the need for mentorship programs and active involvement of wildlife ranching sector and relevant institutions is of particular importance.

    (3) As shown above, game farming definitely has commercial potential in communal areas, but this will depend on the land use planning of those areas. Those using the land will have to agree to such a venture, either using all the available land or a portion thereof. Such ventures could provide a range of opportunities to the communities involved, by way of eco-tourism, hunting and the harvesting of animals for venison.

    (4) Yes the Department promotes commercial potential of game farming however there needs to be a well coordinated effort with those who are already in the industry. This includes co-operation with the Department of Environmental Affairs, Wildlife Ranching SA and providing technical advice to existing and potential game farmers. These interventions will be strengthened by an endorsed policy and will enable DAFF to consider additional assistance to this sector. The National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC) also established a Section 7 company to look at this industry and a report on its potential has been published.

    QUESTION 2605

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 17 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 29 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2650 for written reply: National Assembly, Dr L L Bosman (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    Whether her department implemented sections (a) 4, (b) 5, (c) 6, (d) 8, (e) 25, (f) 28, (g) 37, (h) 38, (i) 42, (j) 51, (k) 56 and (l) 58 of the Disaster Management Act, Act 57 of 2002; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW3307E

    REPLY

    (a) Section 4, Intergovernmental Committee on Disaster Management

  • The above-mentioned section is not the responsibility of DAFF, rather of the Presidency to establish such a committee. Minister of DAFF is a committee member.
  • (b) Section 5, National Disaster Management Advisory Forum

    • The above-mentioned forum has been established under the auspices of Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA). CoGTA is the custodian of the Disaster Management Act, 57 of 2002. The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) participates in the Forum for compliance as stipulated by the Act.
    • The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) established the National Disaster Risk Management Committee (NARMCO). The committee oversees all agricultural disaster risks related matters. Participating members are: Provincial Departments of Agriculture, DAFF, Agricultural Research Council, South African Weather Service and Universities.
    • DAFF has also established the National Agro-meteorological Committee (NAC) for the implementation of early warning systems in support of disaster risk management. This committee meets quarterly to review the season, the agricultural production status and the seasonal forecast for the sector. It constitutes Provincial Departments of Agriculture, DAFF, Agricultural Research Council, South African Weather Service and Universities. Furthermore, Early Warning Committees were established in the provinces to serve as an intermediary between NAC and the farmers. NAC reports its activities to NARMCO.

    (c) Section 6, National Disaster Management Framework

    • DAFF implements disaster risk management activities according to the National Disaster Management Framework of 2005 as envisaged by the Act. It is used as a framework for sectoral contingency strategies.

    (d) Section 8, Establishment of Disaster Management Center.

    • This is the responsibility of CoGTA. DAFF participates in the Center's activities to support implementation of the Act.

    (e) Section 25, Preparation of Disaster Management Plans (National)

    • DAFF developed the draft sectoral Disaster Management Plan as prescribed in section 25 of the Act. The draft plan was discussed with all stakeholders including organised agriculture. The draft plan is in the process of being gazetted for public inputs and comments.
    • Section 28, 37, 38, 42 and 51 is not the mandate of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries as stipulated in the Act.

    (k) Section 56, Guiding principle for funding of Post Disaster Recovery and Rehabilitation

    • The National Disaster Management Centre (NDMC) coordinates funding for post-disaster recovery and rehabilitation as stipulated in the Act. Funding requests for all sectors are submitted to the NDMC for consolidation and further submission to National Treasury.
    • Subsequent to funds being made available by National Treasury, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries develops Disaster Relief Schemes. Disaster Relief Schemes encompasses principles listed in Sections 56 (4a-f) of the Act. The focus for Disaster Risk Management is the promotion of Risk Reduction Measures as required by the Act. Therefore, Disaster Relief Schemes are developed mainly to assist farming communities who have been severely affected by disasters and cannot cope with the impacts of the disaster using their own resources alone.
    • Currently there are no dedicated funding mechanisms for disaster response, recovery and rehabilitation and as a result Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA) through the National Disaster Management Centre is developing the funding model in order to address the challenge.

    (l) Section 58, The establishment of the Unit of Disaster Management Volunteers

    • The establishment of such units is not the responsibility of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Volunteers are the mandate of Metropolitan or District Municipalities. DAFF has developed an institutional model to assist Provincial Departments of Agriculture to establish the Disaster Risk Management Units as focal points to coordinate all Disaster Risk matters in the provinces.

    Funds to the total amount of R12.4 million were made available for the floods of 2006 in the Eastern Cape and no funds have been made available for the 2007 Floods within DAFF.

    The funds for the above assistance were requested twice, firstly directly from DAFF to the National Treasury and secondly through the National Disaster Management Centre at the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, and in both instances funding requested was not approved.

    QUESTION 2554

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 13 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 28 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2554 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr. M Swart (DA) to ask the Minister for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) What are the names of the (a) directors of the board and (b)

    Managers controlling the eight institutions accredited by her department to distribute Mafisa funds;

    REPLY:

    (1) The names of (a) board members and (b) managers are listed on the table attached:

    (2) The institutions are compensated from the interest earned from loans disbursed and recovered. Each institution charges 8% interest on the loans it grants to qualifying applicants. From this (8% interest earned) the institution will keep 7% of the interest earned by the loan and the remaining 1% goes back to the Mafisa fund. This means that the institution that disburses and recovers more loans will earn more. All interest earned by the uncommitted funds (money not yet given as loans) accrues to Mafisa fund and not to the institution. In short institutions keep 7% of the 8% charged to the end user as its compensation.

    QUESTION 2480

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 03 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 26 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2480 for written reply: National Assembly, Mr M Swart (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) What are the names of the (a) directors of the board and (b)

    Managers controlling the eight institutions accredited by her department to distribute Mafisa funds;

    (2) Whether these institutions receive compensation for the disbursement and control of Mafisa funds; if not, why not; if so, (a) what compensation and (b) what are the further relevant details? NW3051E

    Reply

    (1) The names of (a) board members and (b) managers are listed on the table attached:

    (2) The institutions are compensated from the interest earned from loans disbursed and recovered. Each institution charges 8% interest on the loans it grants to qualifying applicants. From this (8% interest earned) the institution will keep 7% of the interest earned by the loan and the remaining 1% goes back to the Mafisa fund. This means that the institution that disburses and recovers more loans will earn more. All interest earned by the uncommitted funds (money not yet given as loans) accrues to Mafisa fund and not to the institution. In short institutions keep 7% of the 8% charged to the end user as its compensation.

    QUESTION 2454

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 03 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 26 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2454 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr. M J Ellis (DA)to ask the Minister for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) Whether, since her reply to question 1364 on 31 May 2010, a certain person (name furnished) has now been employed in her department or Ministry; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what is (a) his designation, (b) his annual salary and (c) the nature of the work he conducts for her department or Ministry;

    (2) whether he filled a vacancy that was publicly advertised; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW3022E

    REPLY:

    (1) No.

    (1)(a) N/A

    (1)(b) N/A

    (1)(c) N/A

    (2) N/A

    QUESTION 2441

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 03 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 26 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2441 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr. ND du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    What is her department's policy regarding the Bio Fuel Industry in light of the maize surplus produced over the past year? NW3009E

    REPLY:

    All the time the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries adhered to the Cabinet decision regarding the Bio Fuel Industrial Strategy approved in December 2005. This decision excludes the use of maize as a bio-fuel feedstock. Due to recent challenges, the Department is considering reviewing this policy position.

    The departments standpoint always was that duel purpose crops, that is crops that can be used for both bio-fuel and food, should be targeted until such time that enough technical information are available on other crops that are currently not produced in South Africa. The fact that maize is in over supply does however not imply that ethanol can be economically produced from it at the present price of crude oil and maize feedstock respectively without major government investment.

    In addition, the potential investors in bio fuel plants would however like to be assured of supply and do not like the idea of only using surpluses. At the same time, the Department is responsible for ensuring Food security in the country thus all these matters would have to be considered in reviewing this policy position.

    QUESTION 2440

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 03 SEPTEMBER 2010 [IQP No 26 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2440 for written reply, National Assembly: Mr. N D du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    Whether her department has any strategies and plans of action at its disposal to empower emerging stock farmers to fill the gap in the market; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW3008E

    REPLY:

    Strategies available to empower emerging stock farmers to fill the Gap in the market,

    MAFISA (Micro Agricultural Financial Institutions of South Africa)

  • Accredited National Emergent Red Meat Producers Organisation to be a livestock credit provider for all livestock emerging farmers
    • Developed and implementing accredited co-operative learning materials to train livestock co-operatives and other co-operatives in the sector

    In addition to the Mafisa interventions, DAFF has a National Livestock Development Strategy (LDS) that includes steps to empower emerging stock farmers to enter the market along the entire value chain. See attached

    This document was endorsed at MINMEC level and provides a detailed framework that includes interventions at legislative, policy, structural, institutional, service provision, research and development and market and trade levels needed to ensure that the entire livestock sector will benefit.

    The LDS also includes industry responsibilities as far as these interventions are concerned – making provision for assistance to emergent stock farmers to enter the value chain – from farmer to the market. A National Livestock improvement policy further supports the strategy.

    The document is being used by the Provinces to develop own strategies to adapt to the real needs of stock farmers, owners and keepers in specific production biomes and socio cultural/ economic environments. The LDS is also under review to ensure that it remains relevant.

    In addition to this, DAFF supports a program to assist emergent beef cattle producers to improve the management of their herds by recording critical information such as herd fertility and calf performance. This program, Kanyofatso ya di kgomo is managed by the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) on behalf of the Department.

    The National red Meat Producers Organisation (NERPO) has also been contracted by the Department to provide training to emergent red meat producers throughout the country

    It should be noted that this initiative would be far more effective if more funds were allocated to Livestock research and development.

    QUESTION 2391

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 27 AUGUST 2010 [IQP No 24 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    QUESTION 2391 FOR WRITTEN REPLY: NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, DR L L BOSMAN (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

    Whether her (a) department or (b) any of its entities has signed any contractual agreements with General Nyanda Security Advisory (GNS) or any of their affiliates (i) in the (aa) 2006-07 and (bb) 2007-08, (cc) 2008-09 and (dd) 2009-10 financial years and (ii) during the period 1 April 2010 up to the latest specified date for which information is available; if so, (aaa) what is the nature of each contract, (bbb) what is the monetary value of each contract, (ccc) what is the (aaaa) start and (bbbb) end date of each contract, (ddd) what are the details of the process that was undertaken for the signing of each contract, (eee) who else tendered for each contract that was awarded and (fff) what amount did each tendered quote in each case? NW2960E

    REPLY:

    (a) No

    (b) No

    (i) (aa), (bb), (cc) and (dd) No

    (ii) No

    QUESTION 2364

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 27 AUGUST 2010 [IQP No 24 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2364 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr. N. D. du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) Whether, with reference to her reply to question 1162 on 11 May 2010 and the court order in favour of the Red Meat Industry on 29 January 2010, procedures have been put in place for the import and export of wild and livestock from areas where there are possible contamination of Foot-and-Mouth Disease and other diseases; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the details of these procedures and (b) what are the further relevant details;

    (2) Whether these procedures have been communicated to the red meat industry; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details;

    (3) Whether these procedures meet the standards of the various international standard setting bodies; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW2933E;

    REPLY:

    1. a) No procedures have been put in place yet.

    b) The DAFF is in the final stages of consultations with Provincial Directors of Animal Health to complete their inputs and views on the proposed "Policy on importation of live cloven hoofed animals (excluding buffalo and domestic ruminants) from countries or zones not recognized as free from foot-and-mouth disease by the World Organization for Animal Health" document.

    Once this policy framework has been accepted and recommended by the Provincial Directors of Animal Health to the DAFF it will then be submitted to the Minister for approval. Thereafter it is ready for publication in the Government Gazette.

    2. No documentation on this proposed policy has yet been circulated to any stakeholder. This will occur when the document is being publicized in the Government Gazette for public comment by all stakeholders including the Red Meat Forum. It is expected that the publication will occur before the end of September 2010.

    1. The process followed first seeks to meet the Court Order granted on 29th January 2010. Each activity is managed within the guidelines of the OIE. When the Risk Assessment will be undertaken it will also be done according to the procedures described by the OIE which consists of Principles and Conventions for international trade involving animal commodities. Identification of specific potential animal health hazards of significant hazards posed by specific diseases and the degree to which they can be ameliorated by mitigation measures associated with importation of cloven hoofed animals will be addressed.

    QUESTION 2363

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 27 AUGUST 2010 [IQP No 24 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2363 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr. N. D. du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    1). Whether her department currently employ veterinarians from foreign countries; if not, why not; if so, (a) how many and (b) in each case (i) from which country do they originate, (ii) where are they employed and (iii) in what capacity are they employed? NW2932E.

    REPLY:

    1): There are currently no veterinarians from foreign countries deployed in the Directorate of Animal Health and the Directorate of Veterinary Quarantine and Public Health of DAFF, although especially Zimbabwean nationals regularly apply for State Veterinary Posts at the DAFF.

    QUESTION 2362

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: MONDAY 30 AUGUST 2010 [IQP No 25- 2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2362 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Mr N D Du Toit (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) Whether her department provides bursaries to students studying Veterinary Science; if not, why not; if so, how many bursaries are provided to students each year, (b) what funds are made available each year and (c) what (i) are the details of the students who received these bursaries and (ii) is the academic progress of each of these students;

    (2) Whether all these students are South African citizens; if not, (a) how many are not South African citizens and (b) from which countries are they? NW2931E

    REPLY

    1. Yes. The Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries introduced the External Bursary Scheme in 2004. The scheme makes provision for allocation of bursaries to deserving students to follow a career in one of the identified scarce skills in agriculture, forestry and fisheries at institutions of higher learning. Bursaries are also allocated for students who wish to study Bachelor of Veterinary Science (BVSc).

    (a) On average since the inception of the scheme in 2004, twenty five (25) are supported annually to study Bachelor of Veterinary Science (BVSc) with an average of eight (8) students constituting new intake per year.

    (b) The total budget of R8.3 million is made available annually to implement the External Bursary Scheme of the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. This budget has been R8.3 million since inception of the scheme in 2004 and supports 200 students annually across all identified critical and scarce skills in agriculture, forestry and fisheries. On average, R1.8 million of the total budget (R8.3 million) is spent on BVSc.

    (c) The table below indicates the profiles/details and academic progress of all students allocated bursaries to study BVSc since inception of the External Bursary Scheme in 2004 – 2010.

    No

    Surname

    Name

    Gender

    Race

    Province

    Year awarded

    Academic Progress

    1

    Alwar

    Delon

    M

    I

    KZN

    2004

    Currently 6th year of study (BVSc)

    2

    Conradie

    Andrea

    F

    W

    N W

    2004

    Completed BVSc(2008)

    3

    Letsoalo

    Kgabo Veronica

    F

    A

    LP

    2004

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    4

    Magano

    Oratile

    M

    A

    N W

    2004

    Deviated & completed Bsc Animal Science(2008)

    5

    Mogongwa

    Mosadiapula Catherine

    F

    A

    N W

    2004

    Excluded & Discontinued studies(2006)

    6

    Mokwala

    Makomane Michael

    F

    A

    N W

    2004

    Deviated & completed Bsc Animal Science(2008)

    7

    Moswa

    Ntlaparu Pincess

    F

    A

    N W

    2004

    Currently 6th year of study (BVSc)

    8

    Motsisi

    Boitumelo Caroline

    F

    A

    LP

    2004

    Currently 6th year of study (BVSc)

    9

    Mpehle

    Ayanda

    M

    A

    N W

    2004

    Currently 6th year of study (BVSc)

    10

    Mphuthi

    Rapule Solomon

    M

    A

    N W

    2004

    Completed BVSc(2007)

    11

    Rampa

    Lentswe Ferdinand

    M

    A

    N W

    2004

    Completed BVSc(2006)

    12

    Reddy

    Darshana

    F

    I

    KZN

    2004

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    13

    Ringani

    Gordon Vongani

    M

    A

    G P

    2004

    Deviated & currently BSc Zoology

    14

    Senthumule

    Muthumune Edward

    M

    A

    N W

    2004

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    15

    Singh

    Anisha

    F

    A

    KZN

    2004

    Excluded & Discontinued studies (2004)

    16

    Smalle

    Tesh Mischelle

    F

    W

    M P

    2004

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    17

    Van Ryn

    Nicolize

    F

    W

    G P

    2004

    Currently 6th year of study (BVSc)

    18

    Wilson

    Karin Louise

    F

    W

    W C

    2004

    Completed BVSc(2005)

    19

    Alais

    Marina

    F

    W

    G P

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2008)

    20

    De Haast

    Adel

    F

    W

    E C

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2008)

    21

    De Louw (Lewis)

    Michelle

    F

    C

    G P

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2006)

    22

    De Swardt

    Nadia

    F

    W

    W C

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2008)

    23

    Mabena

    Sipho

    M

    A

    M P

    2005

    Deviated & completed Bsc Animal Science(2008)

    24

    Mc Gavin

    Lauren

    F

    W

    W C

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    25

    Montgomery

    Lisa Marie

    F

    W

    KZN

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    26

    Naidoo

    Yecintha

    F

    I

    G P

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2006)

    27

    Ncama

    Andile

    M

    A

    KZN

    2005

    Deviated &completed Bsc Biotechnology(2009)

    28

    Payton

    Tammy-Lou

    F

    W

    E C

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    29

    Phele

    Letshuti

    M

    A

    N W

    2005

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    30

    Ratner

    Judy

    F

    W

    KZN

    2005

    Currently 6th year of study (BVSc)

    31

    Sekati

    Paul

    M

    A

    KZN

    2005

    Deviated ¤tly studying BSc Food Science

    32

    Sparks

    Jacquelynn

    F

    W

    KZN

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    33

    Tshanwakani

    Azwimbavhi

    M

    A

    LP

    2005

    Deviated ¤tly studying BSc Animal Science

    34

    Van Balla

    Graham

    M

    C

    W C

    2005

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    35

    Malahlela

    Cathrine

    F

    A

    G P

    2006

    Excluded & Discontinued (2006)

    36

    Moodliar

    Sashni

    F

    I

    KZN

    2006

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    37

    Nogimane

    Winston Smiso

    M

    A

    KZN

    2006

    Exclude & Discontinued(2006)

    38

    Reddy

    Derisha

    F

    I

    KZN

    2006

    Completed BVSc(2008)

    39

    Mefane

    Moratehi

    M

    A

    N W

    2007

    Completed BVSc(2008)

    40

    Naidoo

    Romona

    F

    I

    KZN

    2007

    Currently 6th year of study (BVSc)

    41

    Pillay

    Trishanta

    F

    I

    KZN

    2007

    Completed BVSc(2009)

    42

    Motala

    Zarina

    F

    I

    KZN

    2008

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    43

    Saugh

    Sasha

    F

    I

    KZN

    2008

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    44

    Seipone

    Kenneth

    M

    A

    N W

    2008

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    45

    Chong

    Lauren Candice

    F

    C

    W C

    2009

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    46

    Govindasamy

    Jothie

    F

    I

    G P

    2009

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    47

    Moodley

    Orisha

    F

    I

    G P

    2009

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    48

    Moodley

    Sharlene

    F

    I

    KZN

    2009

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    49

    Moonsamy

    Nileshnie

    F

    I

    KZN

    2009

    Currently 4th year of study (BVSc)

    50

    Packery

    Niven Kailash

    M

    I

    G P

    2009

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    51

    Pillay

    Solita

    F

    I

    G P

    2009

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    52

    Southgate

    Cher Phoebe

    F

    I

    W C

    2009

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    53

    Subramanian

    Debisha

    F

    I

    KZN

    2009

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    54

    Boodhoo

    Chiraag

    F

    I

    GP

    2010

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    55

    Engel

    Tina Lizanne

    F

    C

    W C

    2010

    Currently 4th year of study (BVSc)

    56

    Govender

    Vashnee

    F

    I

    KZN

    2010

    Currently 5th year of study (BVSc)

    57

    Malepe

    Selina Keleatswe

    F

    A

    GP

    2010

    Currently 4th year of study (BVSc)

    (2) All the students allocated DAFF bursary to further their studies in one of the identified scarce and critical skills in agriculture, forestry and fisheries are South African citizens.

    QUESTION 2249

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 20 AUGUST 2010 [IQP No 23 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    MR N D DU TOIT (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

    Whether her department and/or any of its entities has purchased any 2010 Fifa World Cup Soccer tournament (a) clothing or (b) other specified paraphernalia; if not, what is the position in each case; if so, in each case, (i) what are (aa) the details and (bb) the total cost of the items purchased, (ii)(aa) how many items have been purchased and (bb) why, (iii)(aa) to whom has each of these items been allocated and (bb) why have these items been allocated to these persons and (iv)(aa) on what basis was the decision taken to purchase each of these items and (bb) on whose authority was the decision taken to make these purchases?

    REPLY:

    Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF)

    (a) & (b) No

    Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP)

    (a) Yes

    (b) No

    (b) (i) (aa) Soccer T-shirts

    (bb) R57 000

    (ii) (aa) 220

    (bb)(iii) (aa) Employees

    (bb) To encourage staff to support the national team

    (iv) (aa) To support the National Team

    (iv) (bb) Management

    NCERA Farms

    (a) and (b) No

    National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC)

    (a) & (b) No

    Marine Living Resources Fund (MLRF)

    (a) Yes

    (b) No

    (b) (i) (aa) Soccer T-shirts

    (bb) R144 318

    (ii) (aa) 402

    (bb) To motivate staff

    (bb)(iii) (aa) Employees

    (bb) Staff motivation

    (iv) (aa) To motivate staff

    (iv) (bb) Management

    Agricultural Research Council (ARC)

    (a) & (b) No

    Perishable Products Export Control Board (PPECB)

    (a) Yes

    (b) No

    (i) (aa) Soccer T-shirts

    (bb) R56 000

    (ii) (aa) 450

    (bb) staff motivation

    (iii) (aa) Employees

    (bb) staff motivation

    (iv) (aa) To motivate staff

    (bb) Management

    QUESTION 2217

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 20 AUGUST 2010 [IQP No 23 -2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    MR N D DUTOIT (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

    (1) Whether her department or any of its entities has (a) purchased or (b) leased any buildings for administration (i) in the (aa) 2008-09 and (bb) 2009-10 and (ii) for the 2010-11 financial years; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aaa) what is the cost of the building, (bbb) what is the size of the building, (ccc) wht was it bought or leased, (ddd) what will be its use, (eee) who will occupy it and (fff) approximately how many persons will occupy the total space of each building;

    (2) whether her department and any of its entities intends purchasing or leasing any buildings for administration for the (a) 2011-12, (b) 2012-13 and (c ) 2013-14 financial years; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (i) what is the cost of each building, (ii) what is the size of each building, (iii) why will it be bought or leased, (iv) for what will it be used, (v) who will occupy it and (vi) approximately how many persons will occupy the total space of each building?

    REPLY:

    Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF)

    (1) (a) & (b) No

    (2) No

    In view of the fact that the Department of Public Works is the custodian of state property this Department does not have the authority to procure property or to enter into lease agreements for office accommodation. In terms of the Government Immovable Asset Management Act (Act 19 of 2007) each government Department has to submit its office space requirements annually by submitting its User Asset Management Plan for processing by the Department of Public Works.

    Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP)

    (1) (a) & (b) No

    (2) No

    NCERA

    (1) (a) & (b) No

    (2) No

    National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC)

    (1) (a) & (b) Yes

    (1)(aa) & (bb) Yes

    (ii) Yes

    (aaa) Cost of renting: R96 566 monthly

    (bbb) 896 Square meter

    (ccc)To execute the mandate of the NAMC

    (ddd) Office accommodation

    (eee) NAMC Staff members

    (fff) 43

    (2) (a), (b) & (c ) Yes, the NAMC entered into a lease agreement with Old Mutual and the contract will only expire on 13 July 2013

    (i) – (vi) Same as above

    Agricultural Research Council (ARC)

    (1) (a) & (b) No

    (2) No

    The ARC does not lease buildings for administration purposes. The buildings leased by the ARC are for research purposes and such buildings are occupied by ARC researchers. The location and size depends on the nature of the research being undertaken. The buildings currently leased, cost the ARC R796,682.08 per annum.

    The ARC does not intend to lease buildings for the period 2011/12, 2012/13 and 2013/14. The ARC has adequate office space for administration purposes.

    MLRF (Marine Living Resources Fund)

    (1) No

    (2) No

    Perishable Products Export Control Board (PPECB)

    (1) (a) No

    (b) Yes

    (i) (aa) Yes

    (bb) Yes

    (ii) Yes

    (aaa) R4,9 million

    (bbb) 4 488 Square meter

    (ccc) Office accommodation

    (ddd) Same as above

    (eee) PPECB staff members

    (fff) 350

    (2) (a) Yes

    (b) Yes

    (c ) Yes

    (i) 2,3 million

    (ii) 1 307 square meter

    (iii) Office accommodation

    (iv) Same as above

    (v) PPECB staff members

    (vi) 350

    QUESTION 2203

    DATE OF PUBLICATION: FRIDAY 20 AUGUST 2010 [IQP No 23- 2010] SECOND SESSION, FOURTH PARLIAMENT

    Question 2203 for Written Reply, National Assembly: Dr L L Bosman (DA) to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries:

    (1) How many delegates from different provinces representing (a) farm workers, (b) nongovernmental organisations and (c) government departments attended the National Farm Workers' Summit which was organised by her department and held in Somerset West, Western Cape, during the period 29 to 31 July 2010;

    (2)(a) What was the actual cost of hosting the summit, (b) what was the breakdown of the cost and (c) which budget expense account was utilised to pay for the summit? NW2710E

    Reply

    (1) The national summit was attended by 2030 (two thousand and thirty) delegates from all over the country. Of this total, 1400 (one thousand four hundred) were vulnerable workers from all nine provinces, representing workers from the agricultural, forestry and fisheries sectors. The remaining figure of 630 (six hundred and thirty) is divided among 30 (thirty) Very Important People (VIPs), 150 (one hundred and fifty) host officials, 50 (fifty) members of the media, 200 (two hundred) service providers, 10 (ten) members of security services, 50 (fifty) exhibitors, 20 (twenty) interpreters, 10 (ten) members from the protocol services and 10 (ten) from Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

    Province

    No. of farm workers

    NGO attended the summit

    No. of officials

    Eastern Cape

    103

    12

    17

    Free State

    85

    5

    9

    Gauteng

    75

    5

    11

    KwaZulu Natal

    89

    4

    6

    Limpopo

    65

    14

    4

    Mpumalanga

    58

    25

    8

    North West

    69

    10

    5

    Northern Cape

    128

    56

    9

    Western Cape

    728

    105

    57

    TOTAL

    1400

    236

    126

    (2) Actual cost of the summit

    (a) The actual cost of hosting the summit was R13, 559,235.44

    (b) Breakdown of costs table below

    ITEM

    Total spend

    1

    Venue

    2,302,420.21

    2

    Accommodation

    1,810,908.76

    3

    Marque

    2,817,982.43

    4

    Equipment

    634,945.80

    5

    Decorations

    147,060.00

    6

    Entertainment

    45,625.00

    7

    Conference material

    397,240.74

    8

    Communications

    1,030,050.00

    9

    Report writing

    488,237.00

    10

    Transport

    413,915.00

    11

    Health & wellness

    253,979.00

    12

    Domestic flights

    2,629,593.59

    TOTAL

    12,971,957.53

    MANAGEMENT FEE

    587,277.91

    TOTAL

    13,559,235.44

    (c) The departmental budget expense account was utilised to pay for the summit.