This
report replaces the report of the Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources that
was published on page 1682 of ATC No 62 on 30 May 2011.
Report of the Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources on the Strategic
Plan and Budget Vote 32 of the Department of Mineral Resources for the 2011/12
Financial Year, dated 25 May 2011.
The
Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources (the Committee), having considered the
Strategic Plan [2011/12] and Budget Vote 32: Mineral Resources, reports as
follows:
1. Introduction
The Department of Mineral Resources (the Department) was able to split
from the erstwhile Department of Minerals and Energy (DME) to become a stand alone
department on 01 April 2010 as planned. Subsequent to the State-of-the-Nation
Address (SONA) delivered by the President of the Republic of South Africa, Mr
Jacob Zuma, on February 2011, the Minister of Finance
delivered his Budget Speech on February 2011. In his speech, the Minister
allocated funds to the priorities identified in the SONA.
The Strategic
Plan of the Department of Mineral Resources (the Department) and Budget vote 32
were referred to the Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources (the Committee),
for consideration and report, on 09 March 2011. The Committee received
briefings from the Department on its Strategic Plan for the 2011/12-2013/14
period and Estimates of National Expenditure 2011 on 20 April 2011.
2. Overview
of Budget Vote 32 and Strategic Plan of the Department
The
Strategic Plan of the Department was informed by government priorities, the 2011
State of the Nation Address, 2011 National Budget Speech and sector specific
challenges.
The
mandate of the Department of Mineral Resources is to ensure transformation,
economic growth, health, safety and sustainability of the minerals and mining
sector. The Department seeks to promote and regulate the minerals and mining
sector for transformation, growth, development and ensure that all South
Africans derive sustainable benefit from the country’s mineral wealth. Its
two-fold vision envisages a globally competitive, sustainable and meaningfully
transformed mining and minerals sector by 2014, and ultimately, leading in the
transformation of
·
Council for Mineral Technology and
Research (Mintek);
·
Council for Geoscience
(CGS);
·
The Mine Health and Safety Council
(MHSC);
·
The South African Diamond and
Precious Metals Regulator (SADPMR);
·
The State Diamond Trader (SDT); and
·
2.1 Departmental
Strategic Goals and Priorities
The
Department has set itself the following strategic goals for the 2011/12-2013/14
period:
·
Increased investment in the minerals
and mining sector;
·
Improve the health and safety
conditions in the mining sector;
·
Achieve equitable and sustainable
benefit from mineral resources;
·
Transform the minerals sector; and
·
Create an efficient, effective and
development-oriented Department.
One of the focus areas of the Department in its strategic plan was to
finalise a Service Level Agreement (SLA) with the Mining Qualifications
Authority (MQA) to support and improve the current initiatives to address the
skills shortage in the Department.
In line with the afore-mentioned departmental mandate and the policy
priorities identified in the 2011 SONA and 2011 Budget Speech, the Department
has identified the policy priorities for the minerals and mining sector for the
2011/12 financial year, and these are the following:
·
The implementation of the National
Mining Sector Strategy, if approved by Cabinet;
·
The completion of various processes
related to the Mineral Beneficiation Strategy;
·
Policy and legislative developments;
·
Amendment of the Mining Charter and
the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (policy and legislative
developments);
·
The establishment of the State Owned Mining Company;
·
The implementation of the strategy
on Small Scale Mining;
·
Management of derelict and ownerless
mines (protecting the environment),
·
Acid Mine Drainage (AMD);
·
Mineral Regulation administrative
processes (as well as ensuring the transparent administration of prospecting
applications);
·
The South African Mineral Resources
Administration (SAMRAD) online system;
·
The establishment of the Compliance
Inspectorate Unit within the Mineral Regulation Branch;
·
Ensuring that companies comply with
Social and Labour Plans (SLPs);
·
Addressing capacity challenges in
the regional offices (skills development) ; and
·
Improving Mine Health and Safety.
2.2
Departmental programmes
The
strategic plan of the Department outlines in detail the objectives, measures,
Medium Term Expenditure Framework targets and initiatives of the four
departmental programmes, namely;
·
Programme 1: Administration;
·
Programme 2: Promotion of Mine
Safety and Health;
·
Programme 3: Mineral Regulation; and
·
Programme 4: Mineral Policy and
Promotion.
2.2.1 Programme 1: Administration
The
purpose of the branch is to provide strategic support and management services
to the Ministry and the Department. This programme houses the following
branches: Corporate Services, the Chief Financial Office, Audit Services and
the Chief Operating Office.
2.2.1.1 Corporate Services
The
following are the priority areas of the Corporate Services Branch:
·
Contributing to skills development;
·
Communicating the department’s policies
and programmes;
·
Facilitating transformation
initiatives;
·
Developing, reviewing and implementing
policies and procedures;
·
Proving legal support to the
department;
·
Implementing the national vetting
strategy;
·
Implementing the performance
management development system;
·
Facilitating management and
leadership development;
·
Filling funded and vacant posts; and
·
Attracting, developing and retaining
skills.
2.2.1.2 Chief Financial Office
The
office has set itself 15 priority areas, which include:
·
Providing reliable and timely
information;
·
Educating and empowering
stakeholders;
·
Promoting transformation policies;
·
Aligning Information and Communications
Technology (ICT) with business objectives;
·
Facilitating management and
leadership development;
·
Attracting, developing and retaining
skills;
·
Aligning the Department’s budget
with its strategy;
·
Managing costs effectively;
·
Filling of funded vacancies;
·
Maximising utilization of resources;
·
Improving turnaround times;
·
Providing adequate facilities for
effective service delivery;
·
Implementing policies, processes and
procedures;
·
Providing ICT systems; and
·
Promoting corporate governance.
2.2.2 Programme 2: Promotion of Mine Health and Safety
The
Promotion of Mine Safety and Health programme aims to ensure the safe mining of
minerals under healthy working conditions. The programme is composed of two
sub-programmes, which are Governance Policy and Oversight and Mine Health and
Safety ( in regions). The priority areas of the Mine
Health and Safety branch for the medium term are as follows:
·
The promotion of health and safety –
the branch will target a 20 per cent percentage reduction (per annum) in
occupational injuries, fatalities, diseases and dangerous;
·
Contribute to skills development – a
10 per cent increase in certificates of competency issued in envisaged; and
·
Ensuring an efficient and
development-oriented Department – by ensuring compliance with Service Level
Agreements, developing and reviewing internal processes as well as improving
turnaround times.
2.2.2.1 Mine Health and Safety
Inspectorate’s
The
Department initiated the process of restructuring the Mine Health and Safety
Inspectorate to enhance its capacity to enforce the provisions of the Mine Health
and Safety Act. The Province of the
The
process of filling the Health Unit’s posts of chief director and directors was
being finalized. The filling of these vacancies will advance the focus on
occupational health matters. The learner inspectors’ project has assisted with
improving the vacancy rate in the regions.
2.2.3 Programme 3: Mineral Regulation
The
aim of the Mineral Regulation Programme is to regulate the minerals
and mining sector, to promote economic development, employment and ensure
transformation and environmental compliance. This programme is comprised of
three sub-programmes, which are Mineral Regulation and Administration, Management
Mineral Regulation, and the South African Diamond and Precious Metal Regulator
(SADPMR).
The
priority areas of the Mineral Regulation branch for the medium term are as
follows:
·
Promoting job creation – this will
be achieved by ensuring jobs from new mining rights, through the development projects
for Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) as a
result of increased compliance inspections, and local economic development
projects;
·
Promoting sustainable resource use
and management – through the adjudication of work programmes and verify these
by means of inspections;
·
Reducing State environmental
liability and financial risk – in cases of identified rights and/or those with
inadequate financial provision, inspections will be conducted and statutory
notices or orders issued where there is non compliance. The branch will also
seek to ensure that no residual liabilities remain for the State before any closure
certificates are issued;
·
Ensuring the implementation of
transformation policies; and
·
Monitoring and enforcing compliance
– the branch seeks to achieve 100% compliance with regulatory requirements.
2.2.4 Programme
4: Mineral Policy and Promotion
The
Mineral Policy and Promotion programme aims to develop relevant mineral
policies that promote
·
Management;
·
Mineral Policy;
·
Mineral Promotion;
·
Assistance to Mines;
·
Council for Geoscience;
·
Council for Mineral Technology and
Research;
·
Economic Advisory Services; and
·
Mine Environmental Management.
The following are the priority areas
for the Mineral Policy and Promotion programme:
·
Promoting
investment in the mineral sector – by targeting a percentage growth in fixed capital
investment in the sector. The implementation of the mining sector strategy and
the beneficiation strategy, amongst other things, will play an important role
in achieving this goal;
·
Promoting
sustainable resource use and management – a framework for mine environmental
management will be strengthened, whilst the department also seeks to
rehabilitate more derelict and ownerless mines (for example, there are plans to
rehabilitate 12 more mines in 2011/12 financial year). The management of acid
mine drainage is another key priority for this programme;
·
Ensuring
transformation in the mining sector – by reviewing incumbent legislation,
implementing the competitiveness and growth strategy as well as Research and
Development partnerships at regional and international levels;
·
Developing
and reviewing internal processes; and
·
Improving
turnaround times – improve turnaround times on all processes.
2.3 Budget summary
2.3.1 Expenditure Analysis
The table below outlines the
department’s allocation for the medium term, as well as its analysis:
|
Programme |
Budget |
Nominal |
Real |
Nominal change (%) |
Real change (%) |
|||
|
R million |
2010/11 |
2011/12 |
2012/13 |
2013/14 |
2010/11-2011/12 |
2010/11-2011/12 |
||
|
Administration |
223.7 |
247.9 |
258.7 |
274.6 |
24.2 |
12.8 |
10.82 |
5.74 |
|
Promotion of Mine
Safety and Health |
142.1 |
147.5 |
157.5 |
170.1 |
5.4 |
- 1.4 |
3.80 |
-0.95 |
|
Mineral Regulation |
212.4 |
160.4 |
171.0 |
175.4 |
- 52.0 |
- 59.3 |
-24.48 |
-27.94 |
|
Mineral Policy and Promotion |
417.7 |
480.4 |
520.3 |
558.7 |
62.7 |
40.7 |
15.01 |
9.74 per |
|
TOTAL |
995.9 |
1 036.2 |
848.8 |
1 178.8 |
40.3 |
- 7.2 |
4.05 |
-0.72 |
The Department received R1.0 billion, which is 0.21 per cent of the
total appropriation for all votes in the 2011/12 financial year, and a marginal
decrease from last year’s 0.22 per cent share of the total appropriation by
vote. However, the total departmental budget has increased by 4.05 per cent in
nominal terms but decreased by 0.72 per cent in real terms from the 2010/11
financial year.
The bulk of the budget, which is 56.7 per cent, has been allocated for
current payments. Current payments constitute a total value of R587.6 million.
A large portion of the current expenditure goes to the Compensation of
Employees and this amount takes up 64.3 per cent of the total allocation to
current payments. The total value of employee compensation is R377.6 million.
The remainder of the current payments, at 35.7 per cent or R210 million, has
been allocated to goods and services. Of this amount, the largest share of 28.3
per cent or R59.4 million will be spent on travel and subsistence. In terms of
the overall departmental allocation, a total portion of R377.6 million or 36.4
per cent will be spent on employee compensation and R59.4 million or 5.7 per
cent will be spent on travel and subsistence. All capital payments will be
allocated to Machinery and Equipment in the 2011/12 financial year.
Transfers
and subsidies have been allocated R438.4 million or 42.3 per cent of the total
vote allocation. The largest share of the transfers and subsidies, that is
R238.3 million or 54.4 per cent, has been allocated to public corporations and
private enterprises. An amount of R199.1 million or 45.4 per cent will be
transferred to departmental agencies and accounts.
2.3.2 Programme Budget Analysis
2.3.2.1 Programme 1: Administration
This
Programme budget has increased from R223 million in the 2010/11 financial year to
R247.9 million in the 2011/12 financial year, which is an increase of 10.8 per
cent in nominal terms and 5.7 per cent in real terms. Although all sub-programmes
within the Administration programme increased in nominal terms, this increase
is also due to the significant increase in the Ministry sub-programme budget.
This sub-programme increased by 94.4 per cent in nominal and 82.2 per cent in
real terms from R1.8 million in the 2010/11 financial year to R3.5 million in the
2011/12 financial year. This increase can be attributed to the establishment of
the Ministry after the split of the former Department of Minerals and Energy (DME).
The Corporate Services sub-programme receives a budget allocation of R191.8
million or 77.4 per cent of the programme budget.
In
terms of economic classification, 95.7 per cent of the budget has been
allocated to current payments. Compensation of Employees received an allocation
of R119.6 million or 50.4 per cent of the current payments budget and the rest
has been allocated to Goods and Services. The largest expenditure items under
Goods and Services are Lease Payments at R39.4 million followed by Travel and
Subsistence at R22.3 million.
2.3.2.2 Programme 2: Promotion of Mine Safety and Health
This
programme’s budget increased from R142.1 million in the 2010/11 financial year
to R147.5 million in the 2011/12 financial year. This represents an increase of
3.8 per cent in nominal terms but a decrease of 0.95 per cent in real terms as
a result of the decrease in real terms in both Governance Policy and Oversight
and Mine Health and Safety ( in regions) sub-programmes’ allocation. The
greater portion of this programme’s budget has been allocated to Mine Health
and Safety (in regions) sub-programme, which is responsible for inspections,
audits, monitoring and enforcing compliance with the Mine Health and Safety Act
of1996. This sub-programme received R100.9 million or 68.4 per cent of the
programme budget, which is a 4.7 per cent increase in nominal terms and a 0.1
per cent decrease in real terms compared to the previous financial year.
In
terms of economic classification, 96.1 per cent of the programme budget is
allocated to current payments. Compensation of Employees receives 83.0 per cent
of the current payments budget. Transfers and Subsidies receive 3.6 per cent of
the programme budget, which is R5.3 million in monetary terms. This is a decrease
in nominal terms from the R5.4 million allocated in the previous financial
year. This amount is for transfer to the Mine Health and Safety Council whose
roles are to:
·
Advise the Minister of Mineral
Resources (the Minister) on all occupational health and safety issues in the
mining industry relating to legislation, research and promotion;
·
Review and develop legislation for
recommendation to the Minister;
·
Promote health and safety in the
mining industry;
·
Oversee research in relation to
health and safety in the mining industry; and
·
Liaise
with other bodies concerned with health and safety issues;
The
programme focus areas in the next three years are:
·
Capacity development and process
improvement;
·
Monitoring and evaluation of
occupational health programmes at mines;
·
Monitoring and evaluation of mine
safety programmes; and
·
Reviewing health and safety
legislation to incorporate best practice.
2.3.2.3 Programme 3: Mineral Regulation
This
programme receives 15.5 percent of the total Department allocation, which is a
decrease from the 21.3 percent allocated in the 2010/2011 financial year. The
allocation to the Mineral Regulation and Administration sub-programme has
decreased in both nominal and real terms by 31.83 and 34.95 per cent
respectively. This sub-programme receives R113.3 million in 2011/12 compared to
the R166.2 million received in 2010/11 financial year. However, this
sub-programme has received 70.6 per cent of the programme budget. The SADPMR
sub-programme is allocated the second highest budget at 24.56 per cent of the
programme budget or R39.4 million in monetary terms.
In
terms of economic classification, 75.4 per cent of the budget has been
allocated to current payments. The larger percentage share of 81.7 per cent of
the current payments budget is allocated to compensation of employees.
Transfers and subsidies received 24.56 per cent of the programme budget, which
is a transfer to the South African Diamonds and Precious Metals Regulator (SADPMR).
There is no budget allocated for the payment of capital assets in this
programme.
2.3.2.4 Programme 4: Mineral Policy and Promotion
This
programme receives the largest allocation at 46.4 per cent of the Department’s
budget. The budget allocation for the Mineral Policy and Promotion Programme
increases by 9.74 per cent in real terms compared to the 2010/2011 financial
year.
The
Council for Mineral Technology and Research sub-programme received the highest
allocation at R197.0 million or 41 per cent of the programme budget to provide
research, development and technology that fosters the development of business
in the mineral and mineral products industries. This is a real increase of 13.4
per cent in real terms compared to the 2010/2011 financial year.. The Council for Geoscience
sub-programme receives the second largest allocation at R154.4 million or 32.1
per cent of the programme’s budget. This translates to a 7.9 real per cent real
increase from the previous year’s allocation. The Mine Environmental Management
sub-programme receives the largest increase at 720 per cent in real terms in the
current financial year’s allocation.. The
sub-programme allocation increased from R3.7 million in the 2010/11 financial
year to R31.8 million in the 2011/12 financial year. This sub-programme aims to
provide strategic guidance on mine environmental management and mine closure.
The significant increase is as a result of the shift of funds from the Mineral
Regulation programme to this programme for the rehabilitation of derelict and
ownerless mines.
In
terms of economic classification, the highest percentage of the programme
budget is allocated for Transfers and Subsidies at 81.74 per cent. This is
because of transfers to the Council for Mineral Technology and Research
(MINTEK) and the Council for Geoscience (CGS).
3. Deliberations
Following questions raised by the Committee, the following is the account of the
issues on which the Committee and the Department deliberated:
·
The
rehabilitation of derelict and ownerless mines: Whether budget has been
allocated, what is the actual figure and whether the Department has managed to
trace previous owners of these mines?
It was reported that the budget for
rehabilitation of ownerless and derelict mines for the current financial year was
R52 million. It was further reported that 98 mining companies had been traced
and linked to the ownerless and derelict mines.
·
Reduction
of staff turnover: Whether the Department was putting effort in retaining staff
and what challenges were they facing in attracting people?
The Department identified
attraction, development and retention of skills as well as filling of vacant
funded posts as one of its priority areas for the MTEF period.
·
Acid
Mine Drainage: Whether there was improvement, what the financial implications
were and who was playing what role?
It was agreed that the Committee would,
in the near future, be provided with an opportunity to interact with the
Department on this matter.
·
The
establishment of the Compliance Inspectorate: its powers and accounting lines:
To whom would the Unit account to and what punitive measures would it take?
The envisaged Compliance
Inspectorate would reside under the Department of Mineral Resources and account
to the Accounting Officer (Director-General). The Inspectorate Unit would
invoke punitive measures such as revoking licences and, in some instances, a fine could be imposed depending on the nature
of the offence. The Inspectorate would monitor the implementation of the social
and labour plans.
·
The
State Owned Mining Company: Where the funding would come from?
The Department could not adequately
say where the budget would come from but provided that the process was being discussed
by the Executives.
·
Beneficiation:
It was stressed that the Department needed to start from somewhere. The
Committee saw a serious need to sit down and explore sound strategies of
managing raw materials, not simply exporting them.
The Department stated that the issue
was before the Inter-Ministerial committee where other departments had been
consulted on specific issues. The beneficiation strategy would be tabled in
Parliament after the 2011 local government elections.
·
Job
creation: It was emphasized that the Department should contribute to the call
by the President of the
·
Small-scale
mining: It was stated that the problem with small scale mining was financing.
There were a number of investors who were taking advantage of small scale
miners and something serious had to be done to stop these investors from exploiting
small scale miners
It was reported that the Small-scale
mining strategy has been developed and was ready to be sent to Cabinet.
·
Supply
Chain Management practices: Whether there was a gap in legislation since it appeared
that there was an inability in payments being made within 30 days?
It was reported that there were
problems with the supply chain management but these were not a reflection of a
legislative problem. It was stated that if a supplier supplied goods to
government, it was supposed to have a government official order and if there
was no order number, payment would be delayed.
·
The
South African Mineral Resources Administration System (SAMRAD online): Whether
it was related to the information technology (IT) development?
The Department admitted that there is
a relationship between the two and that it was planning to integrate its systems.
The Department would be developing other modules in the near future.
·
Transforming
the sector: The Department’s capacity to run stakeholder training workshops: Whether
the Department would be able to run workshops on their own or they would
outsource the responsibility?
The Department responded by saying
that the running of workshops was a matter that the Department was not going to
outsource hence the Department would run its own workshops internally.
4. Conclusion
The
Committee appreciated the presentations received and noted the progress made. Briefings
by the Department of Mineral Resources on their strategic plan and their budget
allocation enabled the Committee to explore the budget and strategic plans of
the Department. The Committee however noted that not much is mentioned on the
budget allocated for training and development of staff. Although the Committee
was aware of the nature of work of the Department, which involves a lot of
travelling, a concern was raised about the amount of R59.4 million that is
allocated for travel and subsistence. The Committee further noted that the budget
allocations for rehabilitation of derelict and ownerless mines and the Research
and Development institutes (MINTEK and Council for Geoscience)
were inadequate and therefore needed to be increased. The Committee welcomed
the establishment of the Compliance Inspectorate Unit.
The report was unanimously
adopted by the Portfolio Committee on Mineral Resources on 25 May 2011.
Report to be considered.