REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION
AND TRAINING ON THE ANNUAL REPORT 2009/10 OF MINING QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY
AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES SECTOR
EDUCATION AND TRAINING AUTHORITY, DATED 8 FEBRUARY 2011
The Portfolio Committee on Higher Education
and Training, having considered the Annual Report 2009/10 of MQA and Isset Seta
reports as follows:
1. Introduction
The Portfolio
Committee on Higher Education and Training considered the Annual Report 2009/10
of MQA and Isset Seta on the 10 November 2010. The purpose of the meeting was primarily
to assess the annual financial performance of the above mentioned Setas.
1.1 The
Portfolio Committee on Higher Education & Training
Ms N Gina (ANC), Ms
M Kubayi (ANC), Ms N Magazi (ANC), Ms F
Mushwana (ANC), Mr A van der Westhuizen (DA) and Mr K Dikobo (AZAPO).
Apologies: Mr S Makhubele (ANC), Ms W Nelson (ANC), Mr S
Radebe (ANC), Dr J Kloppers-Lourens
(DA), Ms N Vukuza (COPE), Ms C Dudley (ACDP).
1.2 Mining Qualifications Authority officials
Mr D Msiza:
Chairperson, Mr Y Omar: Acting Chief Executive Officer, Mr M Mdingi: Chief
Financial Officer, Mr D Barclay: Executive Manager, Ms J Moodley: Acting Chief
Operations Officer.
1.3 The Information
Systems, Electronics and Telecommunications Technologies Seta officials
Mr L Chiloane:
Chairperson, Mr O Mopaki: Chief Executive Officer, Mr J Sibeko: Senior Manager,
Mr N Molefe: Marketing and Communications Manager.
1.4 Other guests
Mr H Hoon: Director,
Department of Higher Education and Training, Ms F Kwaza: Parliamentary Media
Liaison, Parliament and Ms K Redpath: Monitor PMG.
The report provides
a brief summary of the presentations by both Setas which highlight the Setas
mandate and mission, strategic imperatives, delivery on the NSDS II, financial
highlights for the year under review and other relevant matters.
2. Summary of the presentations
2.1 MQA
Mr Y Omar: Acting CEO led the presentation which
highlighted the following key issues:
2.2 Isset Seta
Mr O Mopaki: CEO
led the presentation which highlighted the following key issues:
3. The following formed part of the discussion
MQA
The MQA was
requested to explain the matters of emphasis raised by the Auditor-General in
its financial performance and whether there were any steps taken to the culprit
to be formally charged for the fraudulent activity.
It emerged that
administration expenditures increased by 25% during the year under review. The
Seta was requested to elaborate on the matter.
The Committee was
extremely concerned with the number of accidents and loss of lives in the mines
due to lack of safety precaution measures. It was noted that some mines were
located close to communities and their impact on the environment had
devastating effects.
It was raised with
concern that restatement of corresponding figures as a result of errors
reflected either lack of capacity or fraudulent activities of certain
individuals in the Seta. It was noted that the audit committee should ensure
that such instances do not recur as they reflect poor management from the Seta.
The Committee was
extremely concerned with the delays in issuing of certificates for learners
that completed learnership programmes.
Isset Seta
The Committee was
concerned with the gender imbalances at senior management of the Seta.
It was noted that
the targets of the Seta might have been set too low and hence it has
over-achieved in most of its programmes.
The Committee
requested an explanation on matters raised by the AG in the financial
performance of the Seta.
It was noted with
concern that as much as the Seta offered New Venture Creations (NVC), most of
these young people were unable to sustain their business and the Seta did not
offer necessary support to ensure sustainability and viability of the
businesses.
The Seta was
requested to explain the remuneration of board members.
4. Responses
MQA
Isett Seta
4. Conclusion
The Committee was
extremely concerned with the financial management capacity of both Setas since
the Auditor-General pointed emphasis on matter in their annual financial
performance. It was unanimously agreed to by the Committee that the National
Skills Development Strategy III targets were set very low hence some of the
Setas achieved more than three times their targets. It was noted that the Committee
should make inputs to the forthcoming NSDS III before it can be made official
with the objective of assessing Seta targets and other critical areas.
It was clear from
the proceedings that Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) remained a challenge
when it comes to implementation by Setas. The issue of transformation in
executive management level positions in the mining and ICT sector is still a
major challenge that remains unsolved.
Access to both Setas by people in rural areas is still a challenge as they
don’t have regional offices in rural provinces. The Committee promised to
engage both Setas during the next financial year when dealing with strategic
plans.