Report of the Select
Committee on Finance on its Oversight Visit to the Municipalities in the North
West on the 20 – 23 July 2010, dated 14 September 2010
1. Introduction
The Select Committee on Finance (the Committee) was
established in terms of section 4(1) of the Money
Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act, No. 9 of 2009. In terms
of section 4(2) of the Act, the Committee has the powers and functions
conferred to it by the Constitution,
legislation, the standing rules or resolution of a House, including considering
and reporting on:
(a)
the
national macro-economic and fiscal policy;
(b)
amendment
to the fiscal framework, revised fiscal framework and revenue proposals and
Bills;
(c)
actual
revenue published by the National Treasury; and
(d)
any
other related matter set out in this Act.
Furthermore,
the mandate encompasses the Committee’s function to legislate, conduct
oversight of the Executive; promote public participation, facilitate
international agreements and review matters of public interest in relation to
National Treasury (NT) and its entities, and the South African Reserve Bank
(SARB). The Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act makes
provision for this Committee to amend Money Bills.
1.1 Delegation
The oversight visit took place from 20 to 23 July 2010.
Meetings were held at Mafikeng/Mmabatho (Mmabatho Palms Hotel) and in the City
of
1.2 Terms of
reference
The visit formed part of the Committee’s ongoing interactions
with municipalities in monitoring collaboration and co-ordination pertaining to
the provision of municipal services and support given to the municipalities by Provincial
and National Departments. The municipalities in North West that were identified
for the visit are: Ditsobotla Local Municipality, Greater Taung Local
Municipality; Kagisano Local Municipality; Lekwa-Teemane Local Municipality; Tswaing
Local Municipality; Tlokwe Local Municipality; Moses Kotane Local Municipality;
Naledi Local Municipality; Maquassi Hills Local Municipality; Mamusa Local
Municipality; Mafikeng Local Municipality; Madibeng Local Municipality, Moretele
Local Municipality; Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality; City of Matlosana Local
Municipality; and Ventersdorp Local Municipality. Greater
The stakeholders (including National and Provincial Departments)
that accompanied the Committee on this visit are the following: Department of
Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA), North West Department
of Local Government and Traditional Affairs (LGTA), National Treasury (NT),
North West Provincial Treasury (PT), South African Local Government Association
(SALGA), Department of Energy (DME), Financial and Fiscal Commission (FFC),
National Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA), National Department
of Public Works (DPW), Provincial Department of Public Works (PDPW), Auditor
General (AG), Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) and ESKOM.
1.3 Purpose of the
Visit
The purpose of the oversight visit was to engage with the
above-mentioned municipalities along with national and provincial departments,
and other stakeholders on the following areas:
2. Presentation by Auditor
General
The Office of the Auditor General (AG) briefed the Committee
on the 2009/10 audit outcomes of municipalities in the
·
The
report showed that, of the 24 municipalities in the province, 13 audit reports
were issued (as on 30 April 2010) of which 4 reports were not yet issued and 7
municipalities had not submitted their financial statements for auditing
purposes.
·
Of
the 13 issued audit reports 2 received an unqualified audit opinion, 3
qualified audit opinions, 1 adverse audit opinion and 7 received disclaimer
audit opinion.
·
The
report further showed that 7 municipalities (namely, Madibeng, Naledi,
Ditsobotla, Tswaing, Ventersdorp, Greater Taung and Moses Kotane) within the
province are currently under administration, 4 municipalities (namely, Tlokwe,
Naledi, Maquassi Hills and Dr Kenneth Kaunda) had vacant municipal manager
positions, 6 municipalities (namely, Madibeng, Mafikeng, Tswaing, Greater
Taung, Rustenburg and Dr Kenneth Kaunda) had their municipal managers on
suspension, and 2 municipalities (namely, City of Matlosana and Dr Kenneth
Kaunda) had their chief financial positions vacant while 4 municipalities
(Moretele, Ventersdorp, Rustenburg and Ngaka Modiri Molema) had their CFOs on
suspension.
·
The
report further showed non-compliance with section 71 of the Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003
(reporting not always done or often submitted late) by some municipalities.
·
The
AG conducted what it calls a door-to-door campaign within certain
municipalities to provide them with support.
Committee
Recommendation
The Committee recommended that the office of the Auditor-General
should compile a report on the door to door campaign/survey they undertook in
the province and that the expected report should be forwarded to the municipalities
and stakeholders that were involved, and should also be forwarded to the Committee
for future reference.
3. Presentations by
Municipalities
3.1
Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality (KRLM) reported that their
integrated development plans (IDP) has been aligned to the
KRLM
reported that their supply chain management policy had been developed, reviewed
and is being implemented, and that they were having three bid committees (bid
specification, evaluation and adjudication committees) which had been
established in June 2010 and were functional. KRLM mentioned that their budget and treasury office (BTO) functions
were reviewed and aligned to sections 80 and 81 of the Municipal Finance Management
Act.
It was also reported that the 2008/09 annual financial statements were submitted after
the deadline to the office of the Auditor-General and the audit will be
finalised by 31 July 2010. It was mentioned that section 71 reports were
submitted. However, due to lack of capacity, these reports were not submitted on
time. However, KRLM reported that they do not have an internal audit unit, the unit
was included in the revised organizational structure and appointments will be
done before the end of September 2010. The
KRLM
reported the following capacity constrains: several key positions are occupied
by aged staff in their Finance Department, and as a result it makes it
difficult to build capacity and to introduce new legislation. Training on the Municipal
Finance Management Act, GRAP and the new Financial Management System was
still needed. KRLM reported that their employee related cost was at 35 per cent
(R28, 8 million) of the operating budget and the repairs and maintenance costs at
7 per cent (R5, 7 million) of the operating budget. KRLM reported that 87 per
cent of their funding was in the form of capital grants and subsidies dependency.
Their own revenue was 13 per cent of the total funds.
Committee
Recommendations
The Committee recommended that:
3.2
Moretele
Local Municipality (MLM) reported that the focus and approach of IDP was aimed
at the attainment of the Provincial Growth Development Strategy (PGDS) but the
challenge was that targets were set for the
MLM reported that the 2008/09
financial statements were submitted late on 14 January 2010 due to
employee/labour strikes. All
section 71 reports for the 2008/09 financial year have been submitted to the
Provincial and National Treasury as per MFMA requirements. It was reported by
MLM that section 71 reports for the 2009/10 financial year had been submitted
up to March 2010 but the Municipality had experienced serious challenges with
regard to making submissions as required in terms of the MFMA.
MLM reported that their internal
audit unit had been established by the Municipality. This unit reports directly
to the accounting officer (Municipal Manager) and had been established due to a
serious lack of capacity that was identified in the unit in the 2008/09
financial year. With the assistance of the Development Bank of Southern Africa
(DBSA) finance secondee, the Municipal Manager has revitalized the internal
audit unit. It was reported that the internal audit unit was better capacitated
and functional in the 2009/10 financial year and, as a result, the unit
accomplished some work in certain areas. It was reported that R28 million (33
per cent) was allocated from the Municipality’s overall budget for salaries.
The Municipality was dependant on capital grants and on operational grants.
MLM identified the following as their service delivery and capacity
constraints:
Committee
Recommendations
3.3
The Moses
Kotane Local Municipality (MKLM) was placed under administration in terms of Section
139 of the Municipal Finance Management Act No. 56 of 2003. It was reported
that the administrator had reviewed the organisational structure of the MLM, and
that vacant posts would soon be filled. The DBSA had been requested to provide technical
support. MKLM reported that salaries, including those of councillors, accounted
for 39, 7 per cent of the total budget allocation. It was reported that the
municipality was using a developmental agency and that it was of the view that
it should be disbanded.
MKLM reported
that they launched a water demand project that was funded by the Department of Water and
Environmental Affairs (DWEA) and the local mines. The
sector departments were not participating to the satisfactory level in the IDP
process of the MKLM. It was reported that, although Eskom provided electricity
in the MKLM, the progress was at a slower pace than it was expected.
Committee Recommendation
The Administrator should provide the Committee with a progress report on
the service delivery and financial affairs of the MKLM within three months
after the adoption of this report by the House.
3.4
Madibeng Local Municipality (MDLM) is currently under
administration in terms of Section 139 of the Municipal Finance Management Act
No. 56 of 2003. MDLM reported that senior managers were resigning from their
positions. This meant that the recruitment process had to start all over again.
Approximately 350 officials of the MDLM were registered with the
Company and Intellectual Property Rights Organisations (CIPRO). There were 10 ‘ghost’ workers, but
at the time of the oversight visit the MDLM was in a process of addressing these
issues. MDLM further reported that 20 per cent of its budget and treasury
office might be suspended due to allegations of fraud, maladministration and
corruption.
MDLM informed the Committee that they budgeted R47,9 million
for repairs and maintenance but enough had not been done as they only managed
to spend R20 million of the budget. MDLM further reported that salaries were at
27 per cent (R224, 9 million) of operating budget. Furthermore, it reported
that an investigation of funds at the Britz Treatment Plant amounting to R20
million was commissioned.
Committee Recommendation
The Committee recommended that the administrator of MDLM should
adopt the management model demonstrated by the administrator of the
3.5
The Mayor of the Naledi Local Municipality (NLM) reported
that he has requested the MEC for Finance to intervene in the running of the
municipality, and were provided with the services of an Acting Municipal Manager
and a Chief Financial Officer. It is reported that both of these officials have
performed very well. It was reported that the troika was functioning well until
January 2010 when the situation changed due to personal interests in the
housing project.
NLM reported that a budget and treasury office had recently
been established. However, it was still experiencing a high vacancy rate that would
soon be addressed in consultation with the human resources unit. NLM further
reported on its inability to implement the Municipal Credit Control Policy due
to a lack of co-ordination in the NLM as there was no agreement.
NLM reported that, between August 2009 and June 2010, its Council
took a decision to appoint staff in acting managerial positions. This practice
led to wasteful expenditure amounting to R810, 000. The Council resolved to stop
the process and those affected were expected to pay back the monies.
NLM reported that there was a loss of electricity due to
illegal connections to the value of R11 million. They have arranged payments
with ESKOM and managed to pay their last installment in March 2010.
NLM was also faced with a lack of co-operation by some of
the local farmers when it wanted to provide services to the farm dwellers.
Committee Observation
The
Committee observed that there was a need for the Municipal Manager to get all
stakeholders on board in order to enable the NLM to resolve the challenges it
was facing. The Committee advised that the Municipal Manager enhances his
negotiating skills.
Committee Recommendations
The Committee recommended that:
3.6
Kagisano Local Municipality (KLM) reported that their
2010/11 IDP was aligned to the PGDS and that their supply
chain management policy was reviewed and adopted on 29 June 2010. It was
reported that two of the three bid committees had been established, namely the evaluation
committee and the adjudication committee.
KLM received an unqualified audit opinion for the 2006/07
and 2007/08 financial years. The annual financial statements for 2008/2009 had not
been submitted to the Office of the Auditor-General as yet, whereas they had to
be submitted by 31 July 2010. The KLM reported that the delay to submit the financial
statements on time was due to a lack of capacity (skills and human resources), and
compliance with the Generally Recognised Accounting Principles (GRAP) 17. The
conversion of the fixed assets register to GRAP proved to be a challenge. Submission
of section 71 reports to the relevant Treasuries were delayed due to the
following reasons/challenges faced by the Budget and Treasury Office: high
staff turnover (due to payment of non market- related salaries), lack of
capacity (skilled personnel), and having to deal with multi-year processing and
finalizing the annual reports and financial statements for the 2008/09 and 2009/10
financial years.
Furthermore, KLM reported that lack of service delivery such as refuse removal had been caused by a lack of capacity such as human
resources and an insufficient budget, partly because these services should be a
function of the district municipality. KLM did not have a refuse removal unit
that deals with this function due to a lack of funds, human resources and
equipment.
Committee
Recommendations
The Committee recommended that:
3.7
Mamusa Local Municipality
(MMLM) reported that the alignment of municipal IDP to PGDS was guided by the
five Pre-determined Local Government Development objectives. One of the
objectives of PGDS was to halve unemployment by the 2014 calendar year and to
create jobs. MMLM mentioned that the Council adopted the supply chain
management policy which was aligned to the National Treasury Guidelines. MMLM reported
that the bid evaluation and adjudication committees were established and that
they were functioning effectively, with the exception of the bid specification
committee. Amounts of R26 million (37, 7 per cent) had been budgeted for
salaries and R7 million (11 per cent) for repairs and maintenance.
MMLM reported that a
budget and treasury office had been established but that it was under-staffed.
The existing organisational structure was approved in 2003 and the officials
need training in Microsoft Excel, MFMA and GRAP. The annual financial
statements for the 2007/08 financial year had not been submitted due to
challenges experienced with the conversion from Institute of Municipal Finance Officers (IMFO) to General
Recognized Accounting Practices (GRAP). MMLM reported that it has complied with
the submission of the section 71 and conditional grants reporting requirements
as at 31 March 2010.
Dr Ruth S Mompati
District Municipality provided internal shared services for auditing to MMLM. The
annual report for the 2007/08 financial had not been finalised due to
outstanding annual financial statements for the 2007/08 financial year.
Service delivery and capacity constraints were hampered by the poor debt collection rate (23%),
impediments to debtor’s collection, and limited legal action caused by outdated
by-laws. The issue of funds being consumed by operational expenses resulted in a
lack of funds for capital items, refurbishments, infrastructure maintenance and
general maintenance of equipment. The national and provincial Departments of
Public Works had been identified as the main debtors. The Municipal
Infrastructure Grant (MIG) funding amounting to R11.4 million for the 2010/11
financial year had been allocated to them to address the huge backlog but it
was insufficient.
Committee
Recommendations
The Committee recommended that:
3.8
Tswaing
Local Municipality (TLM) was currently under administration in terms of Section
139 of the Municipal Finance Management Act No. 56 of 2003 and it was reported
that its IDP was not wholly aligned to PGDS. However, it was focusing on the Small
Medium Micro Enterprises’ (SMMEs) development as part of the Local Economic
Development (LED). TLM reported that it appointed 120 employees within a short
space of time, hence the salary bill exceeded its monthly income.
TLM reported
that the supply chain policy was reviewed and approved by council on 31 May
2010 Annual financial statements were submitted
to the AG on time and section 71 reports of the MFMA were also submitted for
the period up to 31 May 2010. The internal
audit committee was in place and functional (and shared service with the
district), and a plan had been developed to address concerns raised by the AG. The
conversion from Institute of Municipal Finance Officers (IMFO) to General Recognized Accounting
Practices (GRAP) and updating of the asset register has
started.
TLM reported that it was faced with the following service delivery and capacity constraints:
:
Committee
Recommendations
The Committee recommended that:
3.9
Mafikeng
Local Municipality (MFLM) reported that the alignment of IDP to PGDS was guided
by the five pre-determined local government strategic agenda that includes
amongst others, local economic development. MLM reported that it had developed their
Local Economic Development Strategy in line with to the PGDS. It was reported
that salaries as a percentage of
operating expenditure was 53 per cent.
It was further
reported that supply chain management policy was adopted by Council and was
aligned to the National Treasury Guidelines and had been implemented since
2007. MFLM reported that bid specification, evaluation and adjudication
committees were established and they were functional. However, the bid
specification committee was meeting on ad hoc basis. It was reported
that a budget and treasury office had been established. The existing structure
was approved in 2003. However, financial management skills remained a challenge
and GRAP and the MFMA introduced further challenges. MFLM complied with section
71 of the MFMA and conditional grants reporting requirements, and endeavours
were being made to improve the quality of reporting.
MFLM
reported that its annual financial statements for 2008/09 were prepared on Institute
of Municipal Finance Officers (IMFO) standards of accounting, and they were submitted
to the AG on time. MFLM received a “disclaimer” audit opinion due to a lack of supporting
documents, a fixed assets register, debtors database and provision for bad
debts, funds created under the IMFO without cash-backing, the non-implementation
of risk management (internal control systems, internal audit, audit committee)
and, lastly, the non-functional internal audit shared service. MFLM reported that the following steps would be taken to remedy
the situation:
1.
Drafting of a project plan to convert annual financial statements (AFS)
from IMFO to GRAP during the 2009/10 financial year.
2. Appointment
of consultants to assist with the proper management of a fixed assets register
and debtors database.
Committee
Recommendations
The Committee
recommended that:
3.10
The Mayor of the Lekwa-Teemane Local Municipality (LTLM)
reported that it was in need of assistance as it was nearly the end of term for
Councilors. LTLM reported that it was spending well on conditional grants.
However, The LTLM reported that it was experiencing challenges on the deals
with the Library Grant amounting to R2,5 million, and the confusion on the
roles and responsibilities of the department and the municipality on the
spending of grants.
LTLM reported that
they were facing service delivery and
capacity constraints. These included sector departments that were not
participating in the IDP process, and most of the land that belong to the
municipality were used as dumping sites. Over the past five years, they have
been discussing this issue with the Department of Mineral and Energy (DME), requesting
it to come to the rescue by relocating these sites. LTLM further reported that
is was also experiencing a challenge at Bloemhof, in the sense that it was being serviced by two DME regions that were
not operating in terms of the same set
of rules (namely, North West Region and Gauteng Region).
LTLM further reported that they were a water service
provider and that the district was not coming clear on the equitable share for
funding water services and that this creates a challenge as people were drinking
water from the rivers. LTLM further reported that National Treasury and
Provincial Treasury were assisting them with regard to compliance with
financial management matters.
Furthermore, the following issues were raised:
Committee Observations
Committee
Recommendations
The Committee recommended that:
3.11
The Ditsobotla Local Municipality (DLM) was currently under
administration in terms of Section 139 of the Municipal Finance Management Act
No. 56 of 2003, and the administrator has been appointed since October 2009.
DLM reported that it requested the SIU to investigate fraud
with regard to the MIG amounting to approximately R40 million. DLM’s report indicated
that a service provider for the evaluation of properties delivered a below-standard
project. DLM pointed out that there was a need to conduct an investigation as
their IDP was aligned to the PGDS. DLM was also investigating the monthly crash
of the information system that was creating difficulty in terms of reporting.
DLM reported that, as a result of difficulties in the
municipality, the Council did not renew some of the manager’s contracts and
that that has hampered service delivery.
Further challenges were as follows:
Committee
Recommendation
The Committee recommends that:
3.12
Maquassi
Hills Local Municipality (MHLM) reported that they were having the following
bid committees: specification committee, evaluation committee and an
adjudication committee and that these Committees were
approved by the Council on 11 August 2005. MHLM’s budget and treasury office were
not fully staffed. Furthermore, MHLM reported that it had appointed Sediesy
Consulting to assist the municipality with financial reporting (including GRAP
implementation).
MHLM reported that illegal connections of water and electricity, and employment
of unskilled and unqualified staff led to service delivery and capacity
constraints. MHLM’s needs for funding were as follows: R24 million for the mainline sewer connection
of
Further
challenges were reported as follows:
Committee Recommendations
The Committee recommended the following:
3.13
Ventersdorp Local Municipality
(VLM) is currently
under administration in terms of Section 139 of the Municipal Finance Management
Act No. 56 of 2003. It reported that an
electricity substation that had not been functioning for the past two years was
a problem. Assistance was sought from
ESKOM but nothing came of it. It was reported that the service provider who
could not finish a project had now taken the municipality to court, suing it for
R2 million. It was further reported that they did not have a single electrician
at the municipality but had advertised for the post.
VLM informed the Committee that,
for the first time, they were having an Information Technology section that was
fully operational through the assistance of the secondees through the Development
Bank of
Committee
Recommendations
The Committee recommends that:
3.14 City of
The City of Matlosana Local
Municipality (CMLM) reported that the Mayor was the chief ambassador for the
clean audit. CMLM further reported that it was surrounded by a mining area and
mining was scaling down and this was increasing there unemployment rate. Furthermore,
there was a challenge with the indigent register. CMLM
reported that the former Department of Local Government and Housing appointed a
service provider to build houses on behalf of the municipality. In addition,
there was a court case that was costing the CMLM huge amounts.
Committee Observations
Committee
Recommendation
The Committee recommends that:
4. Comments by
Stakeholders
4.1 MEC of Finance
The Member of Executive Council (MEC) for Finance (
With regard to the issue of the
4.2 Auditor General
The Office of Auditor-General (AG) reported that district
municipalities were complaining that municipalities were not participating in
their IDP processes. The AG further reported that it was experiencing a
challenge as some municipalities do not have chief financial officers. Furthermore,
most of the finance unit’s officials did not understand and cannot implement
the GRAP 17.
A challenge of reports being modified by entities after having
been provided by the AG was highlighted. For example, entities tend to change
figures that do not correspond with those in the AG’s office. The AG resolved to provide them with an
unsigned report for the purpose of not tampering with figures, and following
upon this, a signed one is provided as the official annual report to be tabled
in the Council.
4.3 South African Local
Government Association
The South African Local Government Association (SALGA)
reported that it had agreed to a workshop to further capacitate Councilors on
their oversight role.
4.4 National Treasury
National Treasury (NT) reported that the budgets of most municipalities
that made a presentation were unrealistic, even though they had been provided
with training on how to prepare their budgets. It was reported that the
NT reported that they were assisting municipalities in
developing their by-laws and community development programmes such as drafting of
audit plans. They were also capacitating them land evaluation. NT cautioned
Municipalities against the high salary rate versus the high vacancy rate as reported
by most of them.
NT advised that municipalities should start to monitor their
contractors in order to prevent a wasteful expenditure. With regard to the
dispute between
4.5 Provincial
Treasury
Provincial Treasury (PT) reported that they were assisting
the struggling municipalities with their finances and also with issues raised
by the AG on their annual reports. It further reported that the Mamusa and
4.6 ESKOM
ESKOM reported that it appointed a manager to deal with all the
issues relating to electricity in the
ESKOM reported that there was a need for municipalities to
complete their indigent registers so that those, who are eligible, receive free
basic electricity can do so. Furthermore, indigent registers should be shared
with councilors as at times failure to do so create challenges between ESKOM
and councillors.
ESKOM further reported that funds amounting to R5 million had
been allocated to the
4.7 Provincial Department
of Local Government and Traditional Affairs
The Provincial Department of Local Government and
Traditional Affairs (LGTA) reported that the issue of the North West Housing Co-operation
needed to be addressed as it was creating a challenge to municipalities and had
been there since the early 1990s.
LGTA reported that there was a need for the turnaround
strategies of the Tlokwe and
All municipalities in the
4.8 Department of Co-operative
Governance and Traditional Affairs
The Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional
Affairs (CoGTA) reported that all municipalities had been able to spend the
Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) except for the
CoGTA reported that the
4.9 Department of
Energy
The Department of Energy (DME) reported that it was having four
district energy forums in a year and that the
DME also reported that it was in a process of waiving their
80% occupancy policy by means of doing it in phases, and were in a process of
moving away from the policy.
4.10 Department of
Public Works
The Department of Public Works (DPW) reported that some
municipalities were not aware of the Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP) and
that the programme could be of assistance to them. Furthermore, the spending by
those who are benefiting from EPWP is not an acceptable standard.
DPW further reported that they would be assisting
municipalities to rejuvenate some of their townships and that
It was reported that municipalities may approach the DPW when
it comes to land being owned by DPW. However, they can only do this when land
is required for projects and not for the purpose of selling it to other
stakeholders or private companies.
4.11 Provincial Department
of Public Works; Roads and Transport
The Department of Public Works, Roads and Transport (DPWRT) reported
that it had outstanding liabilities that should have been paid prior to the
devolution of the property rates fund to the province. Furthermore, DPWRT indicated that they were
paying property rates to municipalities for properties that were owned by municipalities.
The issue of Tlaakamang where schools were burnt was raised.
It was alleged that schools were burnt because Government promised to tare
roads for them, and the MEC was concerned as no funds were available in the
current financial year. Therefore the DPWRT has to examine the availability of
funds in order to address the matter. The previous Government made a commitment
that was even bigger than the provincial budget and this has created
challenges.
4.12 Department of
Water and Environmental Affairs
The Department of Water and Environmental Affairs (DWEA) reported
that it provides regulatory assistance to municipalities in terms of the Blue
Drop certificates that encourages local
municipalities to improve their water quality management while empowering
consumers with the right to information on what was running out of their taps. DWEA further reported that it assisted
with the Green Drop certificate programmes
for wastewater care works.
DWEA reported that municipalities were providing a water service
that was not within their mandate. They had been doing this for years without
having been funded (unfunded mandates). The
DWEA was of the view that the Department of Human Settlements
should consider providing water tanks when new houses are being built.
The sewer plant for the City of
4.13 Development Bank
of
The Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) identified a
need for better co-ordination of sector departments in terms of planning and in
providing assistance to those municipalities that are still struggling. DBSA committed itself to assist the
The DBSA reported that it was working further with the Provincial
Department of Local Government and Traditional Affairs on a water and
sanitation programme and that R994 million had been approved for the following
municipalities: Maquassi Hills; Dr Ruth Mompati District; Ngaka Modiri Molema
District; Madibeng; Kgetlengrivier; Moses Kotane; Moretele; Rustenburg; City of
Matlosana; and Ventersdorp.
4.14 Financial and
Fiscal Commission
The Financial and Fiscal Commission (FFC) reported that they
were participating in the review of the Division of Revenue, the Provincial
Equitable Share, and the Local Equitable Share and were moving with speed under
the current government. FFC further reported that all the municipalities which were
experiencing challenges with unfunded mandates, should forward such mandates to
the FFC.
5. Key Observations
The Committee observed that there was a lack of leadership with
regard to intergovernmental relationships. This was also the case with regard
to co-ordination amongst municipalities and sector departments. Some of them
requested an increase in the grants allocations while investing huge amounts of
money in the money market, and the Committee could not understand the rationale
behind these requests for more money while other funds are locked in bank
accounts.
Some of the municipalities who met the Committee reported on
their challenges with regard to the late submission of the annual reports to
the office of the Auditor-General. They reported that this delay was caused by
lack of understanding for the implementation of GRAP 17.
The Committee observed that the work of municipalities that
were administered in terms of Section 139 of the Municipal Finance Management
Act No. 56 of 2003 was satisfactory. The Committee has identified a need for
the municipalities to take forward the good work that was being done by the
administrators.
The following additional observations were made:
6. Further Committee Recommendations
The Select Committee on Finance, after a careful
consideration of the service delivery and financial performance of the above-mentioned
municipalities in the
Report to be considered.