REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON
CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS ON OVERSIGHT VISIT TO
1. Background and Overview
1.1 The
Select Committee on Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs, having considered the request by the National Council of
Provinces (NCOP) on the 06th December 2009, to consider and report
on the intervention notice invoked in terms of section 139 (1)(b) of the
Constitution at Umhlabuyalingana Local Municipality, reports as follows:
1.2 In terms of
section 139(1)(b), when a municipality cannot or does not fulfil an executive
obligation in terms of the Constitution or legislation, the relevant provincial
executive may intervene by taking any appropriate steps to ensure the fulfilment
of that obligation, including assuming the responsibility for the relevant
obligation in that municipality.
1.3 In terms of NCOP rule 101, the Office of the Chairperson of
the NCOP referred the notice of intervention in the affairs of
2. Purpose and Objectives
2.1 The
objectives of the oversight visit was to determine whether procedural
requirements have been met and to
verify whether the Provincial Executive has used its discretion appropriately
before the Committee can approve/disapprove the intervention. Through the deliberations and interaction
with internal and external stakeholders, the Committee wanted to determine how
the Provincial Executive was intending to restore the fulfilment of the
relevant obligations and ensure fulfilment in the long-term. The aim being to
ensure that intergovernmental checks and balances aimed at guarding the
integrity and efficiency of the intervention process.
3. Delegation
3.1 The Delegation of the Committee was composed
of the following Members of Parliament and Officials: Hon MH Mokgobi, Limpopo
(ANC); Hon AG Matila, Gauteng (ANC); Hon DV Bloem, Free State (COPE); Mr TM Manele, Committee Secretary
(Committee Section); Mr N Mfuku, Content Adviser (Committee Section); Mr V
Mfuniselwa, Administration Assistant (Committee Section).
4. Introduction
4.1 On the 24th December 2009 the KwaZulu-Natal MEC for
Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs tabled a notice of intervention
on
5. Problems
Identified by the Provincial Executive Council (PEC)
5.1 The main issues identified by the Provincial Executive to
intervene in the affairs of Umhlabuyalingana Local Municipality related to the breach
of legislation, lack of accountability, none availability of section 57
managers, allegations of maladministration, fraud and corruption, irregular,
fruitless and wasteful expenditure, unauthorized expenditure, cash flow
problems and late payments of salaries and creditors.
6. Appointment
and Functions of the Administrator
6.1 The Administrator was appointed on the 24th November
2009 to undertake the functions as contained in terms of Section 51 of the
Municipal System Act, including the development of a turn–around strategy,
rectification of all the decisions made by the Municipal Council prior to implementation,
rectification of all decisions taken by the Municipal Manager and section 57
managers in terms of delegated or original authority, ensuring the implementation of Council resolutions, implement
a system to control and approve all expenditure, implementation of governance
procedures and systems, implementation of financial systems, procedures and
policies, implementation of the Municipal Property Rates Act, preparation of the
adjustment budget for the 2009/10 financial year, and reviewing the organisational structure of
the Municipality.
7. Oversight Visit to
7.1 On the 17th March 2010 the
Delegation of the Committee had interactive and robust engagements with the
internal and external stakeholders of the
7.2 For the purpose of this report, the
submissions made by both internal and external stakeholders are structured
based on the five key performance areas of the local government which are:
Municipal Transformation; Basic Service Delivery; Local Economic Development;
Municipal Financial Viability and Management as well as Good Governance and
Public Participation.
(A). Municipal
Transformation and Organisational Development
7.3 Administrator: The
Administrator indicated that on the 14th
April 2009 the MEC of the then Local
Government and Traditional Affairs gave notice to Umhlabuyalingana Municipal Council
of his intervention in terms of section 136 and137 of the Municipal Finance
Management Act (MFMA) and section 139 of the Constitution, which raised matters
related to the municipal inability to meet all its current creditors commitment
and payments, irregular expenditure, utilization of conditional capital grant
funding is utilized for operating expenditure, and gross mismanagement of cash resources.
7.4 Members of the Community
Forums: The major concerns raised by the Members of the Community Forums in
respect to transformation and organisational development related to the failure
of the Mayor to implement Council resolutions, more especially with regard to
the suspension of the Chief Financial Officer and the Municipal Manager, as
well as instituting of a forensic investigation on misappropriation of
municipal funds.
(B). Basic
Service Delivery
7.5 Administrator:
The Administrator indicated that some of
the challenges faced by the Municipality were the wrong use of the Municipal Infrastructure
Grant (MIG) funds on Council activities, at the expense of service delivery. However,
the major progress reported thus far by the Administrator was the co-operative initiatives
of the Municipality to involve non-governmental organisations and community members
in the municipal planning and development processes.
(C). Local
Economic Development (LED)
7.6 Ward Committees: In terms of this key
performance area, the concerns registered by Ward Committees with regard to LED
related to lack of land use management system, lack of spatial development and proper
Integrated Development Planning (IDP).
(D). Municipal
Financial Viability and Management
7.7
Administrator: The major
challenges reported by the Administrator in respect of financial management
related to lack of financial recovery plan and spending of funds on operational
matters rather than on service delivery matters. Some of the major municipal
financial viability and management progress reported by the Administrator
included successful stabilization of
municipal finances with a cash-flow, the development of a stringent cash-flow
management plan and the development of financial-recovery plan through the co-operation
of the Municipal Councilors.
7.8
Ward Committees: The major
progress reported by the Ward Committee Members as the result of the
appointment of the Administrator and the placement of the municipality under
section 139 (1)(b) of the Constitution
related to the development of Municipal Turn-Around Strategy to manage
municipal finances efficiently.
(E). Good
Governance and Public Participation
7.9 Administrator: The Administrator indicated that the Municipality
had involved members of the public to be part of the consultation process
related to service delivery and municipal planning. He further acknowledged the
support received from the Municipal Council.
7.10 Ward Committees: Members of the Ward Committees in respect of
good governance and public participation, acknowledged the initiatives
developed by Administrator in consulting with the Councillors, non-governmental
organisations and Members of the Ward Committees in developing the municipal
turn around strategy, financial recovery plan and the medium-term budget
review.
8. Committee Observations
8.1 The Delegation of the Committee has
observed that the since the placing of the Municipality under section 139
(1)(b) of the Constitution and the appointment of the Administrator, the Municipality
has made progress in respect of developing a turn-around strategy, development
of medium-term budget review and municipal financial recovery plan.
8.2 Furthermore, it was observed that in all the
intervention visits undertaken by the Committee so far,
9. Acknowledgement
9.1 The
Committee Delegation acknowledged the varied contributions of the parliamentary
staff who participated in the oversight visit in their various capacities. A word of appreciation is also extended to
all the internal and external stakeholders of the municipality who interacted
and had robust engagements with the Delegation of the Committee on matters related
to the placement of the Municipality under section 139 (1) (b) of the
Constitution.
10. Recommendations
10.1 Having conducted the oversight visit to
10.1.1 The National Council of Provinces approves
the intervention as issued by the Provincial Executive Council in terms of
section 139 (1)(b) of the Constitution.
10.1.2
The Administrator should fast-tract the
process of appointing Section 57 Managers and assist the Municipality in
developing a labour-retention strategy, in order to ensure that future service
delivery projects have the support of the community and are aligned with the IDP.
10.1.3 The KwaZulu-Natal MEC for Co-operative
Governance and Traditional Affairs should table quarterly progress reports to
the NCOP and the Provincial Legislature on the status of intervention in the Municipality,
including challenges encountered.
10.1.4 The South African Local Government
Association in co-operation with Local Government Sector Education and Training
Authority should facilitate the training and capacity building for Municipal
Councillors; to further deepen their understanding of the oversight role; legal
framework and policies that govern the activities of the Municipality.
10.1.5
The South African Local Government
Association should also facilitate Executive Training Programme for the municipal
officials.
10.1.6 The approved report by the NCOP should be
shared with all the internal and external stakeholders of
10.1.7
The Select Committee on Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs,
in co-operation with the relevant Portfolio Committee in KwaZulu-Natal
Provincial Legislature would conduct a follow-up visit to the Municipality,
three months after the intervention has ended in order to monitor through
interaction with internal and external stakeholders, progress made in respect
of the intervention in the Municipality.
Report to be considered.