REPORT OF THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON POLICE ON BUDGET VOTE 24 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF POLICE FOR 2010/11, DATED 4 MAY 2010

 

The Committee examined the Budget Vote of the Police (Vote 24) for the 2010/11 financial year as well as the projection of the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) for 2011/12 and 2012/13 which are included in the Estimates of National Expenditure (ENE) 2010. The budget was examined in conjunction with the Department’s Strategic Plan 2010 – 2014 and the Annual Performance Plan for 2010/11. The Committee reports as follows:

 

1.     INTRODUCTION

 

The Portfolio Committee on Police received the following briefings on the budget of the Department of Police for 2010/11:

 

·         The Department of Police: Its Annual Performance Plan and 2010/11 Budget (Vote 24),

 

·         The Civilian Secretariat of Police, which receives a proportion of the budget of the Department of Police: Outline of its budget allocation for 2010/11 in terms of its strategic priorities,

 

·         The National Treasury, Chief Directorate: Justice and Protection Services’s account on the SAPS budget,

 

·         The South African Police Unions (SAPU) and (POPCRU), and

 

·         An overview by the Research Unit of the Parliament of South Africa

 

 

2.     STRATEGIC PRIORITIES FOR 2010/11

 

The current financial year (2010/011) marks the end of the Department’s long-term Strategic Plan that covered the period between 2005 and 2010. However, most of these same priorities are still captured in the Department’s latest long-term Strategic Plan covering the period between 2010 and 2014. These are expressed as follows:

 

·         Reduction of contact crime levels including the “trio-crimes” (house robbery, business robbery, and car-jacking) and crimes against women and children

 

·         Improve effectiveness and integration of the criminal justice system

 

·         Combating corruption

 

·         Crime perception management

 

·         Improve the effectiveness and integration of border management

 

 

·         Integration of Information Communication Technology systems and           

the development of an integrated cyber crime approach  

 

·         Securing the identity and status of citizens; and

 

·         Improving basic service delivery by the SAPS

 

Strategies to be adopted will aim at:

 

·         Investigating crime, and improve the detection rate

 

·         Countering the proliferation of firearms,

 

·         Improving safety and security in high-crime areas,

 

·         Mobilising the population in the fight against crime; and

 

·         Maintaining security at major public events.

 

The challenge that has been laid by Government for all Departments in the Justice, Crime Prevention and Security (JCPS) Cluster is that they must work towards achieving one outcome – ‘to ensure that people are safe and feel safe.” The Department of Police takes the lead in this regard. This outcome can be achieved once crime levels go down significantly to a point where citizens would no longer fear for their lives and/or property. It is an outcome which is directly in line with one of the top five priorities for Government, which is to fight crime and corruption in the next five years and make everyone feel safe. In order to achieve this outcome, the Department has placed emphasis on the following priorities:

 

·           Reducing “trio-crimes”.

 

·         Increasing the detection rate of these crimes from 13.8 per cent to 34 per cent.

 

·         Reducing all serious crimes categories (including high-contact crimes and “trio-crimes”) by 4 -7 per cent.

 

·         Increasing the contact crime detection rate from 52.5 per cent to 57.5 per cent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Department’s activities towards achieving these priorities will include:

 

·             Developing specialised units to fight “trio-crimes”

 

·             Apprehending known perpetrators

 

·             Removing easy access to guns  

 

·             Adding financial forensic capacity to the Directorate for Priority Crime

Investigations (DPCI)

 

Although the Department still focuses its attention on crime prevention and visible crime deterrence, more emphasis for 2010/11 (and going forward) has been placed on increasing the capacity of the detectives in order to complement and supplement crime prevention efforts. The focus on crime prevention for the past ten years has seen the Department increasing in size and strength, as the number of police officials began to grow from 119 000 in the late 1990s to 185 275 by November 2009. The increase has particularly been in Programme: Visible Policing, which hosts police stations and most crime prevention activities such as patrols, beats, and stop-and-searches.

 

Generally, police work needs investment in human resources. Plans to ensure a constant provision of human resources to improve investigation capacity and other support services are in place. The President indicated during the 2010 State of the Nation Address that, over the next three financial years, the number of police will increase by 10 per cent. All these plans are meant to stabilise the crime situation and progress will be evaluated in 2014.

 

However, for 2010/11, the fight against crime is set to take a specific and narrowly defined approach that seeks to direct attention to particular offences, mainly the “trio-crimes” as well as contact crimes. These types of crimes are primarily responsible for the decrease in safety levels throughout the country and, thus, addressing them swiftly may go a long way in changing people’s perceptions about safety and security in the country. This particular approach places more weight on increasing, among other things, the crime intelligence services as well as the investigation capacity within the detective services. Accordingly, the Police budget for 2010/11 has responded positively to this approach, as the allocation for Programme: Detective Services showed an increase of 8.53 per cent in real terms, while Programme: Visible Policing showed a decrease of -1.77 per cent in real terms. 

 

The capacitation of the Detective Services will not only rely on increasing the number of investigators, but will be accompanied by technological advancement that will facilitate and enhance the Department’s investigation capabilities so that crimes can be solved promptly and be brought to court for prosecution with sound evidence. Thus, the allocation for Sub-programmes: Criminal Record Centre and Forensic Science Laboratory increased in real terms by 49.85 per cent and 33.60 per cent respectively. In line with plans for technological advancement, the allocation for computer services increased from R1.7 billion to R2.9 billion, which, in nominal terms is a 64.7 per cent increase. Evidently, the budget allocation in this regard seems to complement the Department’s objective of enhancing the hi-tech approach to investigations.

 

 

3.     SAPS BUDGET

 

3.1                   Overall Analysis

 

The Department of Police has five Programmes namely Administration, Visible Policing, Detective Services, Crime Intelligence, and Protection and Security Services. The overall budget increase for 2010/11 is 3.43 per cent in real terms compared to the previous financial year’s increase of 6.12 per cent. This rather modest increase could be explained by the recent world economic downturn that affected most economies.

 

Despite that challenge, Programme: Administration increased by 7.05 per cent compared to the previous increase of 5.90 per cent in real terms and takes up 35 per cent of the total allocation for 2010/11. Programme: Visible Policing, which receives the largest allocation due to its size in personnel numbers makes up 38 per cent of the total allocation and received, in real terms, a decrease of -1.77 per cent (compared to the previous year’s increase of 4.92 per cent, which was, however, the smallest increase when compared to other Programmes).

 

During the previous financial year (2009/10), Programme: Crime Intelligence received the biggest real percentage increase of 12.5 per cent despite being the smallest Programme in the Vote. However, in 2010/11, it received a 3.17 real per cent increase, while Programme: Detective Services received the biggest percentage increase of 8.53 per cent and makes up 17 per cent of the total budget. Thus, in summary and as reflected in the Table 1 below, all Programmes receive a real increase during the 2010/11 financial year, with the exception of Visible Policing.

 

 

 

Table 1: Vote 24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


A large proportion of the SAPS budget goes to compensation of employees which includes inter-alia, salary costs and social contributions such as allowances (scarce skills and promotions), incentives, overtime, Government contributions to pension fund and medical aid. The allocation for compensation of employees is around R37 billion (70 per cent of the total budget) while R12 billion is allocated for goods and services.

 

 

Programme: Administration

 

The purpose of Programme: Administration is to develop policy and manage the Department. It also provides administrative support.

 

Table 2: Budget Allocation for Programme: Administration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The allocation for Programme: Administration increased by 7.05 per cent in real terms compared to the previous increase of 5.89 per cent. In the previous financial year, the allocation to the Minister had a real increase of 0.81 per cent. However, in the current financial year, this allocation decreased by -0.77 per cent in real terms. On the other hand, however, the allocation to the Deputy Minister had an increase of 0.42 per cent. Sub-programme: Management, whose allocation also includes a portion that constitutes a budget for the Secretariat of Police, increased by 6.47 per cent.  

 

Sub-programme: Corporate Services receives the biggest allocation within Programme: Administration. It was allocated R16 billion for the current financial year compared to the previous allocation of R14 billion. This year’s allocation showed a 7.24 per cent real increase compared to the previous year’s 5.66 per cent. A huge amount of this allocation goes toward contributions for medical aid. This sub-programme also consists of the Training Division which has been allocated R1.3 billion compared to R1.1 billion that was allocated for the previous financial year.  

 

 

Programme: Visible Policing

 

The purpose of Programme: Visible Policing is to enable police stations to institute and preserve safety and security, and provide for specialised interventions and the policing of South Africa’s borderlines.

 

 

Table 3: Budget Allocation for Programme: Visible Policing

 


                                   

 

 

 

 

 

Programme: Visible Policing is one of the priority programmes of the Department. It has three sub-programmes, namely Crime Prevention, Borderline Security and Specialised Interventions. The Programme takes the biggest chunk of the total budget allocation due to its size in personnel numbers. In the current financial year, it received 38 per cent of the total allocation (R20.7 billion), while during the previous year it received 41 per cent (R19.7 billion). In total, it received -1.77 per cent real decrease compared to the previous year’s real increase of 4.92 per cent.

 

With regard to the FIFA 2010 Soccer World Cup, a total amount of R1.3 billion was allocated over the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) period. The final allocation of that amount is R640 million to be utilised in the current financial year largely on personnel-related matters, including payments for overtime, subsistence and transport. Other equipment acquired at the initial stages of this expenditure will be utilised for crime prevention purposes during and after the tournament. 

 

Sub-programme: Crime Prevention is the face of the Department since it constitutes most core policing activities that translate into actual service delivery at ground level, as police stations fall within it. It also entails community and/or sector policing as well as other crime fighting initiatives such as patrols, beats, roadblocks and stop-n-searches. The category of ‘crimes dependent on police action for detection’ arises from this sub-programme. Basically, most initiatives that employ proactive policing measures aimed at achieving Government’s objective of reducing violent/contact crimes, including trio-crimes (robbery, business robbery, and car-jacking), reside within this sub-programme.

 

It should be noted, however, that the decrease in real terms received by Programme: Visible Policing also affected its sub-programmes, which was an inevitable consequence. Thus, sub-programme: Crime Prevention received -1.05 per cent decrease placing its allocation at R19 billion. Sub-programme: Borderline Security received -4.40 per cent decrease placing its allocation at R229 million, whilst the allocation for sub-programme: Specialised Interventions plummeted by -9.96 per cent placing its allocation at R1.4 billion. The Programme is still one of the Department’s priorities. However, the level of emphasis given to it, as expressed in the budget allocation, has somewhat shifted towards Programme: Detective Services. Therefore, the 2010/11 allocation for this Programme will merely serve to ensure that the baseline is maintained.  

 

 

Programme: Detective Services

 

The purpose of the Programme is to enable the investigative work of the SAPS, including providing support to investigators in terms of forensic evidence and the Criminal Record Centre. The Programme has the following four sub-programmes:

 

·         Crime Investigations: accommodates detectives at police stations, who investigate general crimes as well as serious and violent crime.

 

·         Criminal Record Centre: funds criminal record centres, which manage criminal records.

 

·         Forensic Science Laboratory: funds forensic science laboratories, which provide specialised and technical analysis and support to investigators in relation to evidence.

 

·         Specialised Investigations: hosts the DPCI (Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations) which specialises in combatting organised crime. 

 

Table 4: Budget Allocation for Programme: Detective Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Programme: Detective Services received a total allocation of R8.7 billion with a real increase of 8.5 per cent. This Programme received significant increases which reflect Government’s emphasis on it as one of many priorities.

 

Accordingly, sub-programme: Crime Investigations received R6.1 billion which was 2.3 per cent increase in real terms. Sub-programme: Criminal Record Centre received the biggest real increase of 49.8 per cent from R696 million to R1.1 billion. This allocation is in line with Government’s objective of capacitating forensic investigations as a vital aspect of crime detection, and it is also in preparation for the implementation of the first phase of the Forensics Bill that deals with fingerprinting – a function that resides within this sub-programme.

 

Likewise, sub-programme: Forensic Science Laboratory had 33.6 per cent real increase, which saw its allocation rising from R404 million to R576 million. These notable increases are a fulfilment of Treasury’s commitment that was made during the 2009 Budget Speech where it was stated that R5.4 billion had been set aside for overhauling the forensics environment over the MTEF period. The fulfilment of this commitment is working toward the realisation of a revamped criminal justice system which has a separate inter-sectoral budget of R900 million compared to the previous year’s allocation of R200 million. Lastly, a new sub-programme hosting the DPCI is called Specialised Investigations. It received R909 million which was 3.76 per cent real increase from R821 million that was allocated to it in the previous financial year.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Programme: Crime Intelligence

 

The purpose of Programme: Crime Intelligence is to manage crime intelligence and analyse crime information, and provide technical support for investigations and crime prevention operations. The programme has the following two sub-programmes:

 

·       Crime intelligence Operations: provides for intelligence based crime investigations.

 

·       Intelligence and Information Management: provides for the analysis of crime intelligence patterns to facilitate crime detection, in support of crime prevention and crime investigation.

 

Table 5: Budget Allocation for Programme: Crime Intelligence

 

 

 

 

 

 


Programme: Crime Intelligence receives 4 per cent of the total allocation hence it is the smallest Programme in the Vote, with only two sub-programmes, namely Crime Intelligence Operations as well as Intelligence and Information Management. The Programme was allocated R1.8 billion compared to the previous year’s allocation of R1.7 billion, which reflected 3.17 per cent real increase. During the previous year’s allocation, the Programme received 12.25 per cent real increase which translated into significant increases for both sub-programmes. However, in the current financial year, sub-programme: Crime Intelligence operations had a decrease of -4.84 per cent, while sub-programme: Intelligence and Information Management had an increase of 10.50 per cent.   

 

 

Programme: Protection and Security Services

 

The purpose of programme is to provide Protection and Security Services to all identified dignitaries and Government interests. The programme has the following six sub-programmes:

 

·     VIP Protection services: provides for the protection in transit of the president, the deputy president, former presidents and their spouses, and other identified dignitaries.

 

·     Static and Mobile Security: provides for the protection of: other local and foreign dignitaries; the places in which all dignitaries, including those related to the president and deputy president, are present; and valuable Government cargo.

 

·     Port of Entry Security: provides for security at ports of entry and exit, such as border posts, airports and harbours.

 

·     Rail Police: provides for security in the railway environment.

 

·     Government Security Regulator: provides for security regulation, evaluations, and the administration of national key points and strategic installations.

 

·     Operational Support: provides for administrative support for the programme, including personnel development.

 

Table 5: Budget Allocation for Programme: Protection and Security Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Programme: Protection and Security Services has six sub-programmes, and has been growing rapidly in size since its inception in 2004. For the 2010/11 financial year, it received R3 billion compared to R2.6 billion given to it during the previous financial year. Overall, the total allocation for the Programme was slightly lower in real terms as it was 6.14 per cent compared to 7.89 per cent reflected in the previous year’s allocation.

 

Sub-programme: VIP Protection Services received R400 million, which showed a 3.74 per cent real increase compared to the previous real increase of 0.57 per cent. Sub-programme: Operational Support received a real increase of 3.65 per cent whereas, in the previous financial year, its allocation had decreased by -1.78 per cent. This year, a decreased allocation of -2.71 per cent went to sub-programme: Government Security Regulator which, previously, had received a real increase of 15.66 per cent. Although the biggest allocation within the Programme goes to sub-programme: Ports of Entry, it received a lower increase of 8.60 per cent in real terms compared to last year’s increase of 14.18 per cent.

 

 

3.2            Committee Observations  

 

The Committee made the following observations and raised questions as follows:

 

 

·                         Capital infrastructure

 

            Members noted that R1, 118 billion was budgeted for capital works and questioned what this allocation includes. Further questions were raised regarding the number of police stations built annually, compared to the amount budgeted for and the long term capital infrastructure plans.

 

            According to the SAPS the capital works programme makes provision for services to be executed by the Department of Public Works on behalf of client departments to construct policing infrastructure. The capital works programme, inter alia, consists of the construction of new police stations, accommodation and other facilities such as training facilities, garages, shooting ranges and mobilization units. Furthermore, major maintenance and repairs including rehabilitation, renovation, sewerage, water systems, major electrical and upgrading, are also provided for. However, the primary focus for the utilization of the amount allocated for capital works is the establishment or re-establishment of police stations and related accommodation. Apart from the Department of Public Works being responsible for the execution of the Works Programmes, the Department has its own human resource capacity responsible for executing maintenance projects.

 

The construction of new policing infrastructure allows for low cash flow estimates during the first year. Subsequently expenditure trends  peak during the second year and only retention funds are payable during the final phase of the project. Therefore, cash flow requirements are dependent on the phase of construction of various building projects, over a multi-year period.

 

The SAPS has developed a long term capital infrastructure plan that is currently being processed for approval by the National Commissioner. It is estimated that an amount of R1,118 billion (2010/2011), R1,235 billion (2011/2012) and R1,544 billion (2012/2013), will be spent on new capital works annually during the period 2010 to 2013. The plan includes prioritising infrastructure pojects that focuses on the establishment of new police stations and related accommodation.

 

The Committee expressed concern about delays with the building of new police stations and stated that it remains the responsibility of the SAPS national management to avoid these delays. Further concern was noted regarding relations between the SAPS and the Department of Public Works that seem to be stained causing ongoing delays with the role out of new infrastructure.  

 

·         Illegal firearms

 

Provincial Commissioners reported that they have excess firearms. Members questioned whether this is contributing to the number of illegal firearms in circulation.

 

The SAPS stated that it is required that a five percent safety stock level, for emergencies, be maintained at all operational stations, which will assist in providing extra resources when needed. The management and redistribution of resources within the province is the responsibility of the Provincial Commissioner. The Department further stated that no correlation exists between the number of safety stock firearms within the provinces and the number of illegal firearms. The following should be noted relevant to the measures implemented within the Department to prevent the loss of official firearms:

 

·         Departmental policies (Standing Orders 21, 48, 51 and 52) have been developed, circulated and implemented.

 

·         Safes were bought and issued to members.

 

·         Certification functionality for firearm verification was developed on the Provisioning Administration System (PAS).

 

·         The marking of all firearms with the SAPS emblem, serial number and bar code, for better identification, was initiated.

 

·         Parade inspections are conducted by provincial offices at stations, units and section levels.

 

·     A National Cross Functional Team conducts regular visits within the provinces to detect deficiencies.

 

·     A training curriculum was developed to ensure compliance with the Firearms Control Act.

 

·         The Firearm Permit system was developed and is being implemented.

 

·         The Divisions: Forensic Science Laboratory and Supply Chain Management are currently testing all police weapons, in order to record specimens from these weapons on the Integrated Ballistic Information System (IBIS), prior to issuing these weapons to SAPS members. The recording of official weapons on the IBIS system will ensure the linkage thereof to crimes committed with official firearms.

 

·         Management reports are presented to Provincial Commissioners on a quarterly basis as to address discrepancies in the accounting of firearms.

 

·     A Prevention of Firearm Losses Committee Task Team was established within the Department. The Task Team conducts regular inspections in provinces.

 

·         National and Provincial Inspectorate components perform announced and unannounced inspections at stations, units, provincial and national level, on a continuous basis.

 

·             Ratio of personnel to vehicles

 

Members questioned how the ratio of personnel to vehicles is determined and whether circumstances and terrain at each police station are taken into consideration.

 

The SAPS stated that the Resource Allocation Guide (RAG) is a basis to determine the number of posts required to perform policing activities at local level (police station), as well as the allocation of key physical resources like vehicles, IT equipment, etc. The programme consists of ratio analyses, standard times, time percentages, and time estimates (required) of specific elements of tasks or activities performed at the Crime Prevention Unit, Community Service Centre, Detective Service, Crime Information Analysis Centre and Support Services (e.g., Human Resource Management) at police stations of the SAPS. The nature of the terrain (tarred roads - flat or mountainous / dirt road -flat, mountainous and sandy / distances that need to be travelled) and type of duty to be performed (administrative or operational), are some factors that are considered when purchasing vehicles.

 

In terms of an Instruction issued to all Divisional and Provincial Commissioners (National Circular Q22/7/8, dated 29 March 2007) the criteria is defined for the allocation of vehicles within the Department. Apart from promoting the effective and efficient distribution of vehicles, the circular enforces adherence to, amongst others, the following:

 

·         The type and configuration of a vehicle must be considered when vehicles are allocated. For example, 4x4 vehicles are not to be allocated for city driving and sedans are not to be allocated for use in mountainous terrain.

 

·         The purpose for which vehicles will be used must also be considered when they are allocated. For example, for the transportation of prisoners, a patrol van or riot truck must be acquired for this purpose

 

           

·         Detection Rate

 

Members enquired about the low detection target rates and whether these rates are acceptable, taking into account the increase in personnel, resources and training for this programme. The reason for consulting the National Prosecuting Authority to determine a baseline and target for court-ready cases was further questioned.

 

The SAPS indicated that the detection rate refers to cases finalized by the detectives for prosecution, cases resolved through investigation without prosecution (e.g. recovery of wondering stock which is often reported stolen) and cases withdrawn by complainants during investigation and in courts.

 

The Department’s priorities, strategies and funding projections respond directly to the issues relevant to the Department that were raised in the State of the Nation Address, the Government Programme of Action and the Medium Term Strategic Framework. One of these priorities is to enhance the capacity of detectives, forensic and intelligence services. More members are recruited and enlisted on an annual basis towards these services as to ensure adequate policing capacity for service delivery improvement.

 

With regards to the Detective Service an implementation plan to increase the number of detectives was set. During the reporting period from 31 May 2009 to 28 February 2010, the human resource capacity of the detectives increased by 2 102 reflecting a total of 23 419 detectives, which indicates a growth of 9.8%. In respect of the training provisioning plan for the 2009/2010 financial year, the detectives targeted to be trained was 12 928. The total number of members trained by 31 January 2010 was 10 636.

 

The increases affected in the 2009/2010 financial year, in terms of the number of detectives trained and capacity expansion will not translate to immediate radical improvement in performance over the short term, but will impact on future outcomes as these members gain experience. The target range as defined in the Department’s Annual Performance Plan for 2010/2011, towards detection rate, provide for this aspect as well as the intention to increase the outcomes in terms of the baseline defined.  

 

With reference to court ready case dockets, there is an imbalance in the nodes of delivery between the police services and the justice system that have a direct bearing on detection rates. For example, in Mpumalanga, there are 85 police stations serviced by three prosecutors. Detectives have to take their cases to these prosecutors, often multiple times. Moreover, when they are unable to make a decision on their cases, they are then referred to the DPP in Pretoria. This, in turn, entails these same detectives having to commute to and from Pretoria. In the process of going back and forth other cases are neglected, inevitably impacting on the detection rate.

 

In order to overcome the problem of determining baseline cases ready for court a common approach between the SAPS and the NPA at provincial level is required. This will reduce inefficiencies, prevent the loss, misplacement or duplication of dockets and allow for more realistic target setting based on actual conditions.

 

As indicated previously, the detection rate is determined by cases that have been investigated and finalized by detectives and are ready to go to court. These cases are handed over to the NPA who then determine whether to prosecute the alleged offenders or not. It must be noted that the detection rate also includes cases which were finalized by detectives without the need to follow the prosecution route as well as cases which were withdrawn by complainants.

 

The JCPS cluster monitors these cases on a continuous basis and coordinates interdepartmental crime prevention and security initiatives across the integrated justice system up until conviction by the courts. However, it was noted by the Department of Justice that the SAPS does not have a final decision over conviction rates. The purpose of discussions with the NPA and the courts is to create a continuum in terms of the flow of work. The JCPS cluster will also continue to define mechanisms in order to ensure that the detection rate of high priority crime will increase in the nearby future.

 

The Committee again stated that the SAPS and the Department of Justice have to align their statistics capturing measures.

 

·         Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences (FCS) Units

 

Members questioned when the FCS units will be established and operational.

 

Consultation with the nine Provincial Commissioners has been concluded. The structural proposal design is being finalized. All funded posts in terms of the Resource Allocation Guide (RAG) will be filled during the 2010/2011 financial year. The FCS units will be fully operational by 31 March 2011. Currently all FCS related cases are being investigated by detectives at station level.

 

The Minister confirmed that these units will be constituted by the end of June 2010 and fully operational by the end of March 2011.

 

·         Feedback to complainants on cases registered.

 

Members noted that complainants say that SAPS never provide feedback on registered cases. Members questioned what process SAPS utilise to ensure that complainants are provided with feedback on registered cases.

 

Specific enhancements of the Case Administration System (CAS) were effected during 2009.  As soon as a case is registered, the complainant receives an SMS via his/her cell phone (if a cell phone number is provided).  This SMS contains the case number, the investigating officer’s name and contact number. 

 

The above was implemented on 2 March 2009.  Since the implementation date, a total of 1 747 836 SMS’s were forwarded to complainants. This information is obtained monthly from SITA via Information and Systems Management. 

 

If no cell phone number is provided, the complainant receives a document (SAPS 429) with the case number and contact details of the Unit that will be investigating the case in order to make any enquiries about progress on the case. In rural areas the SAPS 429's are mostly utilized due to lack of proper infrastructure.

 

The Department concedes that there are shortcomings when it comes to feedback to complainants with regards to court dates and the finalization of their cases. The Department is, however, in a process of improving the complainants’ feedback system until their cases are finalized. Further measures are taken by General Investigations: Head Office to monitor the SMS system both electronically and manually on a monthly basis.

 

Greater focus will be placed during inspections by Head Office to ensure that the detectives give monthly feedback to complainants until their case dockets are finalized.  If it is found that feedback is not given to complainants as instructed, disciplinary actions will be instituted.

 

 

·         SAPS Informers

 

Members enquired how SAPS utilise informers and how their claims are dealt with.

 

SAPS stated that information supplied by SAPS informers accounts for many successes achieved by the Department. They are remunerated for the information supplied to both intelligence and detective services. All aspects regarding informers and claims for informers are regulated by National Instruction 2/2001. The National instruction is very explicit in detailing the control measures to be followed, both on the financial aspects as well as the operational aspects.

                      

·         Job descriptions and Job titles

 

Members questioned when last the National Commissioner adhered to the SAPS Regulation 26, that outlines the establishment of Job Descriptions and Post Titles.  

 

Section 26 of the South African Police Service Employment Regulations, 2008, requires that job descriptions and titles must be reviewed at least once every five years and, where necessary, be redefined to ensure that they remain appropriate and accurate. The Department complies with the provisions as defined in terms of the prescriptive framework highlighted above.

 

·         Overtime payments

 

Members noted that they were informed that SAPS members who worked overtime during the 2009 Soccer Confederations Cup were only paid half of the money due to them. Members questioned whether there was any truth to this allegation and enquired what measures will be taken to prevent a reoccurrence of this during the 2010 Soccer World Cup.

 

The SAPS stated that an agreement at the Safety and Security Sectoral Bargaining Council (SSSBC), Agreement 4/2009, regulates the payment of overtime to all employees who render policing duties at major sporting events. The Department did comply with the criteria defined within the agreement and honoured all payments of overtime during the Confederation Cup.

 

The agreement highlighted, is currently being reviewed by the Department. The review process will however be finalised and implemented by the Department before the commencement of the Soccer World Cup.

 

Members express concern that the SAPS have not set a deadline for finalizing negotiations.

 

·         Salary increases

 

Members noted that its alleged that the higher ranks within the SAPS tend to benefit the most from annual salary increases and further enquired what percentage members at lower ranks get compared to those in higher ranks.

 

The determination of any conditions of service of employees in the Public Service, including the SAPS, is made at the committee of Ministers. The committee consists of, amongst others, the Minister for Public Service and Administration, the Minister of Finance and other Ministers as the Cabinet may designate.

 

The Senior Managers in the Public Service received an annual cost of living adjustment of six per cent for the 2009/2010 financial year with effect from 1 January 2010.

 

A staggered approach was followed for members on salary level 1-12 (Public Service Act Employees) and salary bands A to MMS (SAPS Act Employees).  These employees received an annual cost of living adjustment of 13 per cent at the lower levels to a maximum of 10 per cent at the higher levels, with effect from 1 July 2009.

 

·         Establishment of the Border Management Agency

 

Members questioned the need to establish a Border Management Agency while the Border Control Coordinating Committee (BCOCC) already exists and how this new agency will enhance border policing.

 

The SAPS stated that there is a need to establish a Border Management Agency to deal with border issues in line with international best practice. The Border Control Coordinating Committee (BCOCC) is more of a committee coordinating activities from different departments involved in border control.

 

 

·         Escapes from custody

 

Members questioned the average figure of 50 per cent decrease in the number of escapes from police custody, noting that in reality the incidence of escapes from police custody is increasing.

 

According to the SAPS the number of escape incidents reflected is 905 incidents for 2006/07, 664 incidents for 2007/08 and 719 incidents for 2008/09. The average number of escapes during these three years is 762.

 

In addition the Department has set a target to decrease the number of incidents with 50 per cent, during the 2010/2011 financial year. The following measures are being implemented to achieve this goal:

 

·         Guidelines are being developed for police stations to ensure effective and efficient detention management. These guidelines focus on the relevant organizational instructions that are already incorporated in the Department’s Standing Orders.

 

·         Specific trends and tendencies of escapes will be identified and mechanisms developed and introduced to prevent further escapes.

 

·         Furthermore, once an escape occurs, the Department registers a criminal case for investigation and institutes immediate disciplinary proceedings, against the member(s) involved.

 

·         Policing during the FIFA 2010 Soccer World Cup

 

Members questioned the impact of policing in communities when SAPS members are taken from police stations to police this event.

 

According to the SAPS there will be no negative impact on policing in the communities during the FIFA World Cup. Policing of this event is part of local policing activities. Officers from local police stations, including reservists, are not going to be deployed outside their policing precinct. They will carry on with their normal service delivery, at community service centres and crime prevention duties, within their precinct, including event venues. Police officers are not going to be deployed inside the stadiums/venues, but at strategic points like routes, hotels, tourist attraction areas, shopping malls and/or any other concentrated area, including identified crime hot spots in the station area.

 

SAPS members that will be deployed, specifically for the FIFA World Cup, are from National and Provincial specialized units, like the Special Task Force, National Intervention Units and VIP units (for Teams and VIP protection), and Public Order Units (for crowd management at stadiums and venues).

 

Therefore, policing in the communities will, instead, benefit from the policing of this event, as there will be more resources that will enhance police visibility within police precincts, where FIFA World Cup activities will be taking place.

 

                   The Committee expressed concern that the Department’s plan to                           combat Human Trafficking during the FIFA 2010 World Cup does not

                            include women.

 

·          Human trafficking during the 2010 FIFA Soccer World Cup

 

Members questioned what plans are in place to prevent Human Trafficking during the 2010 FIFA Soccer World Cup.

 

The Department is part of interdepartmental processes aimed at the prevention of human trafficking. In this regard, the Department is a member of the Priority Committee on Child Protection during the FIFA World Cup period led by the Department of Social Development and the Human Trafficking Steering Committee led by the National Prosecuting Authority.

 

The SAPS will provide child protection services to children during the 2010 FIFA World Cup who are vulnerable or have become victims of crime by:

 

·     identifying children in need of care and protection, which will include children living in the streets, children at risk of being used by an adult to commit crimes and those at risk of being trafficked.

  

·     equipping SAPS members to identify and address children living and working on the streets.

 

·     creating and implementing awareness programmes at the national, provincial and local levels regarding abuse, exploitation and trafficking of children.

 

·     providing services to unaccompanied children and refugee children.

 

The Department further participates in the development of a campaign aimed at raising awareness of issues that make people vulnerable to trafficking, targeting the FIFA World Cup period. The campaign is led by the National Prosecuting Authority and also includes the Departments of Social Development and Education. This campaign will also provide information on steps that can be taken for assistance should one be in danger of being trafficked. Referral networks will be set up in order to access probation services and secure care facilities where needed.

 

·             Poor performing police stations

 

Members questioned how the 2010/11 budget allocation will assist poor performing police stations.

 

This budget will assist the poor performing police stations by ensuring that additional crime prevention actions are performed at police stations, that more borderline policing actions are undertaken, that the detection rate for contact crimes and crimes dependant on police action for detection are improved from 42,86% to between 43%-60% and that increased cluster and ad hoc actionable intelligence operations on contact crimes are performed.

 

 

4.   POLICE CIVILIAN SECRETARIAT 

 

The Constitution and the South African Police Service Act, 1995 (Act No. 68 of 1995), section 2(1) (a) provides for the establishment of the National Police Civilian Secretariat by the Minister of Police. The mandate of the Secretariat is to:

 

·         Advise the Minister in the exercise of his or her powers and the performance of his or her duties and functions;

·         Perform such functions as the Minister may consider necessary or expedient to ensure civilian oversight of the Service;

·         Promote democratic accountability and transparency in the Service;

·         Promote and facilitate participation by the Service in the Reconstruction and Development Programme;

·         Provide the Minister with legal services and advice on constitutional matters;

·         Provide the Minister with communication, support and administrative services;

·         Monitor the implementation of policy and directions issued by the Minister and report to the Minister thereon;

·         Conduct research into any policing matter in accordance with the instructions of the Minister and report to the Minister thereon;

·         Perform such functions as may from time to time be assigned to the Secretariat by the Minister; and

·         Evaluate the functioning of the Service and report to the Minister thereon.

 

The Police Civilian Secretariat’s budget is incorporated into Programme: Administration of Vote 24 of the Department of Police. Sub-programme: Management, whose allocation also includes a portion that constitutes a budget for the Secretariat of Police, increased by 6.47 per cent in real terms compared to 8.76 per cent of the previous year. This year’s allocation to the Secretariat is estimated to be around R21 million – an amount that is expected to assist in the re-organisation of this structure.   

 

4.1            Secretariat’s restructuring process    

 

The Secretariat is currently undergoing institutional reform in order for the Minister to fulfil his constitutional and legislative obligations. To this end a new legislative framework for the Secretariat is being finalised. Furthermore, the Secretariat has developed five key components that will engage in the process of policy development and research; monitoring and evaluation; partnership management; support services, and the Office of the Secretary.

 

A new management team led by the new Secretary of Police has been appointed by the Minister together with three new Chief Directors in the Policy and Research, Monitoring and Evaluation and the Partnership Units.

 

The primary focus and priority for the coming year is the development of a five-year Strategic Plan the Secretariat identified the following key functional areas with respect to civilian oversight and policy advice to the Minister, which are provided through its components in the following manner:

 

·         Policy and Strategy: Strategic and indicative planning, research and the formulation of departmental policy proposals, which when approved by the Minister, would guide the activities of SAPS.

·         Audit and Monitoring: The monitoring of the Department’s budget to ensure alignment with the policies approved by the Minister. Monitoring the effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of these policies.

·         Providing Ministerial support services: Including the management of international and stakeholder liaison as well as provide legal services.

·         Communication: The implementation of a communication strategy aimed at informing and mobilising role players, stakeholders and partners outside the Department regarding the delivery of safety and security.

·         Accountability: To account to the Minister and to Parliament on issues and activities from time to time or as requested.   

 

 

4.2            Committee Observations

 

The Committee made the following observations and raised questions as follows:

 

·         Budget allocation for Communication

 

The Committee noted that communication is listed as one of the key functions of the Secretariat and yet the budget reflects only a small amount allocated to this function.

 

The Secretariat stated that the majority of their communication will occur through the Partnership Unit of the Secretariat and has been included in the planning and budgeting of this Unit. In addition, each of the other two units have incorporated communication as part of their general plans and budgeting. The communication budget listed under the Secretary of Police’s office refers to website upgrade and specific communication projects that will be directed from the Secretary’s Office such as the release of the crime statistics and the Annual Report of the Secretariat.

 

·         Strategic developments

 

The Committee enquired if the Secretariat is involved in policy and strategic developments occurring in the department and whether the Committee in future will be briefed on these issues.

 

The Secretariat is increasingly addressing policy and strategic issues in consultation with the Minister of Police. There are a number of areas, such as Police Reservists, where it would be important that the Portfolio Committee is briefed. Based on this, there is a need for more regular and structured briefings to the Portfolio Committee. The Secretariat would like to engage the Portfolio Committee through such briefing notes or formal presentations. In addition, the Committee Chairperson is welcome to request the Secretariat to brief the Committee on issues and approaches as the need arises.

 

·         The Secretariat’s monitoring of security plans for 2010 FIFA World Cup

 

The Committee questioned whether the Secretariat will be involved in the monitoring of the security arrangements and implementation of security plans around the FIFA World Cup.

 

The Secretary stated that there are already complex processes in place from the public, media, portfolio committees, government and the FIFA organizing committee. Given the significant public participation in the FIFA World Cup the Secretariat has decided to focus on improved and sustained service delivery issues. Based on its current capacity the Secretariat will evaluate generally how the World Cup security plan were implemented but will not be engaged in the day to day monitoring of the plan.

 

·         Difference between the Inspectorate, ICD and the Secretariat

Members questioned the different roles of the ICD, Inspectorate and the Secretariat.

 

The Inspectorate of SAPS is an internal unit that focuses on quality control over national instructions, internal audits and compliance. The ICD largely focuses on deaths as a result of police action and other complaints related to abuse of police powers. The Secretariat focuses less on individual complaints, but rather on the broader policy and monitoring issues with the view to impacting on the broader transformation of the service. The Secretariat is independent from SAPS and advises and reports to the Minister of Police on these matters.

 

·         Secretariat’s ability to meet targets

 

Members questioned whether the Secretariat has the staffing capacity to meet set targets.

 

The targets set between April and June were the building blocks for the role the Secretariat needs to play going forward. While acknowledging that the Secretariat does not have the capacity to do everything it will use its relationships and partnerships with civil society and provinces to assist in reaching such targets.

 

With regard to the staff complement, this is a matter that is currently being discussed with the DPSA and the Minister. This is being done in order to ensure that the Secretariat is able to implement the new legislation and have the capacity to implement the Strategic Plan presented. A lot of work has been done on the new staff establishment and the Secretariat is confident that by the end of May 2010 it will be in a position to implement all aspects of the Strategic Plan.

 

·         Relationship between the National Secretariat and Provincial Secretariats

 

Members questioned the relationship between the National Secretariat and the nine Provincial Secretariat and whether the National Secretariat plays a role in mobilizing the role players in the provincial departments for the community safety forums.

 

When the legislation is presented it will become clear that the National Secretariat has opted for a collaborative approach to engage with the Provincial departments. Part of this approach will involve the establishment of a provincial forum comprising of all Provincial Secretariats. This forum will be guided and assist the Police Civilian Secretariat with regard to strategic priorities and implementation of such priorities. The National Secretariat will work with the Provinces towards the implementation of the 10 pilot Community Safety Forums.

 

 

 

·         Monitoring the output of the ICD recommendations to the SAPS

 

Members questioned the monitoring role of the Secretariat regarding the outputs of the ICD recommendations to the SAPS.

 

A key area of work of the Secretariat is to monitor the implementation by SAPS regarding the ICD’s recommendations. Regular feedback will be provided to the Minister on any problems that may arise regarding the implementation of recommendations.

 

·         Vehicle distribution in the SAPS

 

Members enquired whether the Secretariat will be conducting research into the distribution of SAPS vehicles.

There is currently an initiative being developed by the National Commissioner to address fleet management within SAPS. The Secretariat will be monitoring the impact, gaps and weaknesses in the Department’s approach and will report to the Minister.

 

 

 

5.   STAKEHOLDER CONCERNS

 

5.1           National Treasury: Chief Directorate – Justice and

                Protection Services

 

The Chief Directorate: Justice and Protection Services Safety of the Public Finance Division within National Treasury briefed the Committee on the SAPS Budget for 2010/11. The National Treasury provided an analysis of some of the key components of the budget including:  broad expenditure trends over time, a breakdown of the 2010/11 economic classification items in the budget and a breakdown of the budget into programmes. 

 

The National Treasury noted that the highest budget growth per economic classifications was salaries, capital expenditure for buildings, maintenance and equipment.

 

The Committee expressed concern about the maximum virament (funds transferred between programmes) of 8 per cent and that the SAPS always use the Visible Policing Programme’s budget for this purpose.

 

 

5.2            SAPS Unions

 

      The SAPS unions, POPCRU and SAPU raised the following concerns:

 

    Restructuring in the SAPS

 

SAPU raised concerns regarding the new rank system that will result in anxiety and fear. Further concern was expressed about the continuous reshuffling of members that result in lost promotional opportunities.

 

POPCRU stated that a flatter organisational structure is required and that restructuring should be focused at reducing the provincial and national structures in order to improve co-ordination. The redeployment to station level of certain specialized operational functions will ensure that crimes are investigated where they occur.

 

 

    Promotions

 

The lack of promotions in the SAPS is of great concern to POPCRU who stated that at the rank of inspector, SAPS members are often frustrated due to a lack of upward mobility. Further concern was raised regarding the filling of vacant posts by external candidates while capable members are not considered for promotions.

 

 

    2010 FIFA World Cup

 

SAPU and POPCRU assured members of the Committee that their members are committed to ensure that a quality police service is rendered during the event. They expressed unhappiness in the manner the SAPS management has been handling the payment of overtime issue but remain hopeful that the current policy will be reviewed.

 

 

6.           RECOMMENDATIONS

  

    The Committee recommendations as follows:

 

·     The Committee encourage the SAPS to continue in its quest to reduce serious crime by 7-10 per cent and not 4-7 per cent as indicated in the SAPS strategic plan and further urge the department to reconsider this position. Further interaction on this matter may be required.

 

· The Portfolio Committee on Police supports the allocations to the following programmes: Administration, Visible Policing, Detective Services, Crime Intelligence; Protection and Security Services and recommends that Budget Vote 24 be passed. The Democratic Alliance (DA) abstained.

 

 

7.  CONCLUSION

 

The Portfolio Committee on Police will continue to fulfil its Constitutional obligation, guided by the rules of Parliament in providing oversight over the functioning of the Department of Police to ensure that the SAPS and the Secretariat function effectively in line with their legislative and policy requirements. The Committee will further engage with the Department on some of the matters that emanated during the hearings

 

Report to be considered.