Report of the Portfolio
Committee on Public Enterprises on the Budget Vote 30 and Strategic Plan
(2009/10 – 2011/12) of the Department of Public Enterprises and its Entities,
dated 17 June 2009:
The Portfolio Committee
on Public Enterprises, after receiving a briefing from the Department of Public
Enterprise, and the following entities: ESKOM, Denel,
Transnet, SAA and the South African Express Airways,
reports as follows:
Introduction
Guided by
the Rules of Parliament, promulgated in terms of the Constitution, the
Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises plays an oversight role on the
Ministry, Department and the Entities. The Committee has to scrutinise the
Strategic Plan of the Department and its Entities in order to evaluate if the
funds requested are aligned to the objectives as stated in the respective
strategic plan documents.
1. Department of Public
1.1.
The Department of Public Enterprises 2009/10 – 2011/12
Strategic Plan is
informed by the following Vision:
To
have State Owned Enterprises that:
- are
efficiently managed and meeting domestic and international industry operational
benchmarks
- play a role in the industry in which they operate to ensure
an optimal allocation of
responsibilities between the public and private sector
- undertake
investment programmes with a “reserve margin” to accommodate faster economic
growth
- leverage
their investment programmes to the benefit of the South African and African
economies on a sustainable basis
1.2 The
Department of Public Enterprises oversees the following State Owned
Enterprises (relative size by asset
base 2007/8):
-
Alexkor - R418m
-
Broadband Infraco - R1,3b
-
Denel - R5b
-
Eskom - R171,1b
-
Pebble Bed Modula
Reactor - R1b
-
South African Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL) - R3,6b
-
South African Airways - R17,6b
-
South African Airways Express - R1,1b
-
Transnet - R98,9b
1.3 The Department of Public Enterprises has
direct responsibility in three strategic
areas in the
Economy, namely:
- Ensuring the security of supply and the
efficient and competitive provision of key economic infrastructure
- Facilitating
the development of advanced manufacturing capability through:
-
Utilisation of SOEs by the state can be used to sort out economically
stifling market or regulatory failures especially in the area of network
infrastructure
1.4 The Department has the following support
programmes to other national
government
departments:
-
Aligning skills development programmes
within the SOE with the programmes and objectives of
the responsible national government departments
-
Aligning investments in and by SOE with the national
innovation development programmes of the responsible
national government departments
-
Supporting government strategies focused on labour absorption and rural development by providing
infrastructure investments and SOE-services with marginal commercial viability
1.5 The Program of Action of the Department
of Public Enterprises is as follows:
§
Providing critical infrastructure
to prioritised small rural towns with mining, agriculture sectors, tourism and
cultural industries
§
Developing a protocol for
integrated servitude utilisation for all infrastructure projects
§
Extending Strategically Important
Development System (SIDS) to other areas of infrastructure
§
Examining alternative funding
mechanisms to continue with the economic infrastructure programme to support
growth and employment creation
§
Rolling out ICT infrastructure
(Broadband) to Increase
connectivity and reduce costs of international communication
§
Programme to
maintain and upgrade electricity infrastructure, including generation,
distribution and reticulation to ensure sufficiency and sustainability of
supply
§
Programme to expand logistics
infrastructure (road, rail, air and ports) for the transportation of goods and
services including agro logistics for farming and agricultural products
§
Ensuring adequate infrastructure
for the supply of liquid fuel to inland provinces and the country at large
§
Continue the programme to build,
maintain and upgrade water infrastructure and ensure its safety for human
consumption, industrial activity and for agricultural activity
§
Standard policies to guide in the
implementation of infrastructure projects
§
Climate change response of the
Infrastructure sector to ensure an integrated
response to climate change
§
Awareness and education campaigns
for energy efficiency
1.6 The challenges facing State Owned
Enterprises
§
Lack of clear definition of the role of SOEs in national economic strategy
§
Non-commercial history of the SOEs
§
Capitalisation challenges
and funding constraints
§
Accumulated infrastructural
investment deficit in
§
Disenabling policy and regulatory environment facing
the SOEs
§
Lack of clarity of Department on Public Enterprises
shareholder management powers
1.7 Budget:
Over the
MTEF period, total forecasted expenditure decreased substantially from R3.8 billion in
2009/10 to R3.1 Billion in 2010/11. Further total expenditure decreased from
R3.1 Billion in 2010/11 to R183.6 million in 2011/12. The significant decline
in 2010/11 is as a result of reduced transfer payments to the SOE. Transfers to SOE amount to R6.9 billion: R3.5
billion to PBMR, R1.5 billion to South African Airways, R724.1 million to
Broadband Infraco and R259.1 million to Alexkor.
1.8. Committee Observations:
The Committee raised the following
key issues:
·
Concern regarding the State of financial distress and
constant non profitability of some State Owned Enterprises
·
Concern regarding ESKOM’s tariff
increase application
·
Strategies to ease the burden of tarrif
increase on the poor
·
Underutilisation of infrastructure, theft
and destruction thereof and strategies to ensure safety of infrastructure
·
Concern regarding equity profile of entities, specifically Denel
·
Concern regarding constant financial bailout of state owned enterprises
1.9 Recommendation
Having deliberated on the
budget vote of the Department, and acknowledged the limitations of time, the
Committee resolved that it would engage further with State Owned Enterprises on
matters emanating from the briefing session so as to assess progress made by
the Department and state owned enterprises. The Committee recommends that budget
vote 30 be passed. The DA and IFP were not in support of the budget vote.
Report to be considered.