Submission by the Democratic Nursing Organization of South Africa (DENOSA) regarding the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Amendment Bill [B 21 – 2007]

 

Introduction


This document serves as the submission of the Democratic Nursing Organization of South Africa (DENOSA) to the Parliamentary hearings on the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy (CTOP) Amendment Bill, 21 of 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the CTOP Amendment Bill).

 

The Democratic Nursing Organization of South Africa (DENOSA) is a national nursing organization with the head office based in Arcadia, Pretoria. The organization represents more than 65 000 nurses in South Africa nationally with offices in each province. DENOSA, as the representative body of the majority of nurses in South Africa, acknowledges the importance of commenting on this Amendment Bill as it has an implication on nurses and nursing profession in this country in the drive to provide excellent quality service.

 

Background and focus of submission

 

The abortion legislation reform was informed by the 1994 Study into Incomplete Abortion by the Medical Research Council with an estimated 425 maternal deaths from illegal abortions in that year. The study found that 44 686 women presented with incomplete abortions, that 99% were Black women and 34% were unsafe abortions.

 

The CTOPA legislation has had a significant impact in increasing access and decreasing abortion related mortality and morbidity. A study in 2000 evaluating the impact of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act showed a significant decrease in morbidity, infection and a significant decrease in maternal mortality. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Deaths 2002 – 2004 demonstrated a 91% reduction in deaths from unsafe abortions

 

As the major representative body of nurses in South Africa, who are mostly women faced with the same challenges that the Act is trying to address, it is right and proper that while we advocate as a union, we should not loose sight of the fact that these providers of health care, who form the majority of the health service providers, are women who also have the right to choice about their own reproductive health. It should not be forgotten that prior to the promulgation of the CTOP Act, nurses had to work hard at caring for critically ill women admitted as a result of illegal septic back street abortions. Most of these young women suffered long term complications, had total abdominal hysterectomies at young ages and remained infertile for the rest of their lives. The World Health Organization (WHO) also released data indicating that whether abortion is legal or not, the numbers are almost the same. The difference is where abortion is legal, it is likely to be safe and saves women’s lives but where it is illegal, it is more likely to be unsafe and lead to high rates of Maternal Mortality and Morbidity.

 

About three weeks ago the WHO released estimates of Unsafe Abortion Mortality for 2003 (Maternal death rates). The figures are

66, 500 Maternal Deaths globally, noting that 66, 400 were recorded in developing countries and this means that only 100 women are dying in the rich developed countries because they all have liberal abortion laws. The African Region Recorded:  36,000, an increase from previous estimates for 2000 of 29,800. The sad news is that even the 100 who died in developed countries are mostly women of colour. This is an unacceptable situation. We cannot close our eyes or ignore the information when women in their masses continue to die from back street abortions which are preventable. Many countries, including South Africa, have data to support the evidence that legalizing abortion is the most effective way to achieve the MDGs No 5 to reduce maternal deaths by 75%

by 2010.

 

The focus of this submission is on the CTOP Amendment Act only, its impact and its implications and does not extend to the original Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act, Act 92 of 1996. The submission covers the amendments in the Amendment Bill and acknowledges Sections with particular relevance to Registered Midwives and Registered Nurses.

 

 

Summary of the Submission

 

Section 1

The additions and broader definitions in Section 1, particularly 1 (c) Registered Midwife and 1 (d) Registered Nurse are significant in providing a legal imperative for competent nursing practice and quality patient care. The addition of prescribed training is critical in terms of the task-shifting component in the legislation and in the clauses that increase access to TOP. DENOSA acknowledges that while there may be some nurses who have conscientious objection to TOP, it is important that these nurses be given the right of refusal to TOP. It is also important that nurses who are willing to undergo the prescribed training be given the opportunity to do so in terms of this Act.

 

Section 3

The Section 3 is supported in the devolution of power from the Minister to the MEC in the provinces to manage the designation of places where TOP can be performed to the provinces, to increase access and avoid undue delays in doing so. This section is strongly supported in the quality control indicators in the context of termination of pregnancy only at a facility that meets all the criteria in clauses 3(1) (a) to (j) and for regulating the collection, recording and management of data.  By increasing the pool of health professionals to include Registered Nurses who qualify to be trained to provide TOP services, the service should become more accessible to more women.   

 

Section 7

Amendment supported in full as it provides for evidence based monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the amendment.

 

Section 10

DENOSA supports the impact of Section 10 which is to regulate the provision of TOP services and legal action of against any person who performs a termination of pregnancy in contravention of the Act.

 

Concluding Comments

The CTOP Amendment Act creates the necessary legislative framework for increasing access to reproductive health care services as entrenched in the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. The provisions of the CTOPA have followed a democratic process of consultation informed by evidence-based research resulting in reduced maternal morbidity and mortality.

This legislation has been a critical factor in reducing maternal deaths from unsafe abortions by 91% in 2006 and contributing to the Millenium Development Goal to reduce maternal mortality by three quarters (75%) by 2010. It has broaden programmes to reduce the percentage of unwanted pregnancies by increasing access to TOP services in the public sector as a key intervention in the HIV & AIDS and STI Strategic Plan for South Africa, 2007 – 2011 Goal 3: Reduce Mother –to-Child Transmission as HIV/AIDS remains a significant challenge to maternal health. 

Therefore, DENOSA advocates strongly for the maintenance of the Act and the Amendment in the legislative framework for the provision of health care including reproductive health care as a Constitutional imperative enshrined in the Bill of Rights. We further feel it will be necessary to increase the number of trained TOP personnel in specified institutions to avoid what is happening now, where one person only is trained and is overwhelmed by work, leading to frustration and resignation  

 

 

 

 

 

 

-