SOUTH AFRICAN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES

 


CHILDREN'S AMENDMENT BILL, 2006

Submission to Portfolio Committee on Social Development

Introduction

  1. The South African Council of Churches (SACC) is the facilitating body for a fellowship of 26 Christian churches, together with associate and affiliate para-church organisations. Founded in 1968, the SACC includes among its members Protestant, Catholic, African Independent, and Pentecostal churches, representing between 16-18 million Christians in South Africa. SACC members are committed to expressing jointly, through proclamation and programmes, the united witness of the church in South Africa, especially in matters of social and economic justice as they pertain to matters of national debate. The South African Council of Churches welcomes this opportunity to make submission on the Children's Amendment Bill [B19B-2006]. We are delighted that South Africa has moved another step closer to bringing legislation for the care and protection of especially vulnerable children in line with international obligations to the rights of the child. While we have a little further to travel in order to finalise the Children's Act, there is much to be thankful for in this piece of legislation. Our particular emphasis in this piece of legislation is to affirm our support, care and compassion toward the many poor, vulnerable and destitute children who rely simply on a nation's care and respect for their dignity, protection and survival.

CHAPTER 5 - PARTIAL CARE (PC) and CHAPTER 6 - EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT (ECD)

  1. Faith based communities and many others use their physical and human resources - such as their premises and dedicated people - to enhance the upbringing, development and care for children on a daily basis. Many do so for little or no reward under trying circumstances. Some of the programmes offered, range from crèche facilities to pre-school programmes as well as after-school care. The SACC affirms the idea that service and program delivery to the community will be enhanced by more coordinated participation between government departments. We recommend that such coordination include the resources organized at local level by the many civic and faith communities. To this end we recognise the need for the setting of norms and standards as well as for procedures of registration for partial care facilities. We caution, however, that unless procedures for registration are efficiently coordinated and integrated into inter-departmental responsibility, a cumbersome bureaucracy may result in community involvement in partial care facilities being a disincentive rather than invitation to dedicated and gifted voluntary workers.
  2. The rationale for separating chapters 5 and 6 appears unclear. There is a close link between partial care (and the registration of the facility) and the programme, ECD. Women, mothers and grandmothers of the Churches - indeed very often whole families and extended families - play significant roles of caring for and raising children and therefore in their early human and social development. We support the wholistic view of development in the definition at s91(1). In line with the international statues for the rights of the child, however, we point out that the terminus ad quem for ECD is age 8. In light of the developmental impediments created and furthered by the legacies of apartheid, disease and disability, we call for the ECD programme and services to be provided "to age 9" (s 91(1) and 91(2)(b). We also support the call by Disabled Children's Action Group (DICAG) to take into account not only the child's chronological age but also his/her developmental stage since many children with disability will come late into ECD.
  3. We affirm the inclusion of a compulsory national strategy in the departmental strategy including special needs such as "disability and chronic illness" (s92(1)). Registration, as stated in 1 above, needs broader and inter-departmental coordination as well as simplification. The SACC welcomes legislation for the provision of ECD programmes at provincial level but recommends that the MEC responsible be obligated to fund the provision of such programmes (s93,(1) to read :" The MEC for social development of a province must ...": delete "may"). This recommendation is to apply to all instances in the Bill where financial provision for services to be rendered is regards as optional ("may").
  4. In order to ensure that the legislation provides ultimately for an effective and integrated service for ECD, PC and Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) we suggest either the creation of linkages with these sections of the Bill or condensing these chapters (ECD, PC and PEI) into one comprehensive chapter.

Chapter 8 - Prevention and Early Intervention

  1. This section aims at the prevention of neglect, abuse or inadequate supervision of children that may lead to breakdown of relationships and family structure which may hinder the provision of the child's needs. It is also aimed at preventing recurring problems in the family environment that may adversely affect the child's development. Should the child come into conflict with the law, this section aims at diverting him/her away from the criminal justice system and the child and youth care system. The provisions aim at the preservation of the child's family structure, an avoidance of removal from the family environment as well as the development of parenting skills by parents and/or care-givers in order to safeguard the well being and best interests of the child.
  2. We affirm this paradigm shift from the earlier statutory (legal-criminal) approach to a social and human developmental model. This transition requires all round capacity development, training and a commensurate provision of resources for it to work effectively. A key point for the identification of and response to child vulnerability - like the provision of care support and/or professional referral - is at the school.
  3. We repeat our previous recommendation that some form of inter-sectoral mechanism, enforcing the cooperation of the departments of Education and Social Development is crucial to realization, effective delivery and success of this developmental approach. This approach should be widened to acknowledge, for instance, the already active work performed by many civil society organizations and faith communities, especially church based organizations. This dynamic and creative approach will also benefit from a broader pool of social assistance by drawing in to the work of professional social workers - already understaffed - auxiliary social workers and other categories of child and youth workers from within these communities and organizations.
  4. We recognize too that municipalities - even though the employment of social work professionals may not fall into their sphere of competencies - have an obligation to cooperate with the other spheres of government to ensure the delivery of these services. As with the previous section, we believe that the obligations of the MEC to provide financial resources for this service be clearly articulated as "must" and not "may" (146 (1)). An effective inter-sectoral mechanism for these services could include, amongst others, the departments of Health, Education, Social Services as well as health, medical and social work professionals from civil society and local municipalities. Delivery at the local level could be checked for delivery by the Integrated Development Plan - compulsory for all municipalities - in terms of the provisions for children in need of care and protection.

Children with disability

  1. Clause 11 of the Children's Act recognizes the state's obligation to provide care and protection for children with disability. The SACC underlines and supports, amongst others areas of concern and opportunity within the Bill as indicated by the Disabled Children's Action Group (DICAG):
    • Legislation is required at the local level to ensure that children with disability receive universal access to services for children as well as specialized services;
    • Prevention services and programmes include the prevention of disability through the provision of poverty eradication services thereby aiming at the elimination and prevention of diseases and disability associated with chronic poverty, e.g. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome etc.; and
    • Appropriate training and capacity building within the ECD, child care work and police Sectors on being equipped and sensitive to a range of skills required to communicate and interact with children with disability.

HIV & Aids, Foster Care and Cluster Foster Care

  1. Due to the inequity between the amount of the Foster Care Grant (FCG) and the Child Support Grant (CSG), families are using foster care as a poverty alleviation measure. Children and caregivers needing income support become locked into a system of expensive child protection. The use of FCG as poverty alleviation detracts from foster care as a provision for child protection since it is not reaching the need (236 000 new orphans in 2004 and total number of FCG beneficiaries in 2004 is 250 000). The government needs to distinguish between "social services and protection services" and "poverty alleviation". Not all orphans are children in need of care and protection. The FCG should be reserved for children in need of care and protection and who have been placed in foster care by the courts. A universal CSG - something like a guaranteed income extended to age 18 - should be used to support relatives looking after children. Kinship care should not be administered by social workers but by other social service professionals such as child and youth care workers. There needs to be a range of options for orphans and vulnerable children (OVC's) that enable them to be dealt with outside of the court system and social work services. Poverty alleviation needs to be de-linked from the court system.
  2. Court-ordered kinship care is still relevant for children who have had to be removed from home while a family member has taken responsibility for that child. The SACC supports the call to stop the use of FCG as a poverty alleviation mechanism. The exploration of formally bringing together "extended family" for support of orphans and vulnerable children in the spirit of Ubuntu/Botho is worth exploring. One such model, Cluster Foster Care, proposed by the National Association of Child and Youth Care Workers appears to be a viable option as long as it does not become a cheaper form of child and youth care centre.
  3. The Foster Care system, intended for the protection of children is facing redundancy due to increased numbers of children in the care of relatives. The Department of Social Development reported that the numbers of children in foster care had by May this year increased by 700% since April 2000. As a result, children in need of care and protection are unable to be dealt with by the protection services and social workers. In the context of South Africa's HIV & Aids pandemic where poverty is a major contributory factor, a coordinated thrust of social services, social security and social assistance is required to work together in a well coordinated manner if a measure of poverty eradication is to be achieved. One solution, frequently raised by the SACC, the labour movement and other civil society organizations, would be to take seriously the extension of the CSG to age 18, non means tested and extended as the first step of a universal income grant.

Discipline of children

  1. The South African Council of Churches welcomes s139 because it seeks to advance a culture of dignity, respect and equity of relations within which our children may be able to flourish as human beings. The DSD is warmly commended for fostering legislation that seeks to recognize children's rights as human rights - children are human beings too - through the proposal to prohibit corporal punishment as well abolish the common law defence of "reasonable chastisement". Furthermore, the SACC welcomes the ongoing support for the role of parental responsibilities by the State as it makes available programs on positive discipline and parenting in line with the Constitutional values of human dignity, respect and equity. We welcome too the prospect that outcomes of such programmes are likely to initiate an environment of trust, rather than fear, respect rather than control and, thereby, provide for a culture that contributes to order through respect, peace building and nonviolence. We support this clause because we believe that it will contribute positively and significantly to turning the cycles of reported violence, abuse and neglect against children in the long term.
  2. In order to bolster our argument from a religious perspective, we include attach a FAQ on Religion, Positive Discipline and the Abolition of Corporal Punishment. We shall only allude to the problem as faced in the public arena. In the Christian context there are differing approaches and interpretations to texts as they may refer to violence in the past. The question that many religious supporters of corporal punishment refuse to ask is, is the text they quote sacred or is the interpretation thereof sacred? Clearly the former may be true for some but the latter more questionable for many others. If there is, then, no one interpretation agreed to by all Christians, there is not an agreed position which may be termed "Christian" or religious. The point here is that it is NOT the task of the legislature to decide on or arbitrate between contending sides of scriptural interpretation. The matter of punishment as it is faced by the policy makers is a question of human rights abuse, when practiced in whatever form. The Church therefore has a duty to the public and the citizens of South Africa to encourage it in legislation that seeks the best Constitutional value - Ubuntu/Botho - even if the "reimaging" of these values challenges the traditions and thought of the religious establishment. The DSD is to be commended in the same way that political institutions are commended for the abolition of slavery and the creation of the United Nations as an institution that was established to broker peace for a war torn world.

Child Headed Households

  1. The SACC welcomes the provision of a mentorship scheme for the care and material support of children living in child headed households. The SACC has no hard and fast opinion about whether the recognized age limit of a child heading a household should be 15 or 16. The SACC is concerned that a requirement for the provincial DSD to recognise a child headed household - and therefore for them to receive assistance - is a social work investigation. The SACC calls for the recognition of 150 (2) of the Children's Act - that all children living in a child headed household be treated as children in need of care and protection - and that a mentor be appointed during the investigation. We suggest that abandoned children be included in the definition of child headed households.

Child and Youth care Centres

  1. The SACC commends the DSD for the provision of these centres whose services include a range of treatment and therapy to children who are challenged with the need for care and protection. We also welcome the provision of Shelters. Since the work done in these centres is of a challenging nature, we call on government to secure the work of professional social and youth care workers.

Children on the street

  1. While we welcome the provision of Shelters, we remain concerned that the delegation of responsibility to municipalities for their registration might not happen in the spirit of inter-sectoral cooperation with provincial government. We affirm, however, the importance of municipalities' responsibility for delivering on care and protection of children at these Shelters. We also affirm the expanded norms and standards expected of personnel at these centres.

Conclusion

  1. The SACC has worked with civil society in general and with the Children's Bill Working Group in particular over the past years. We know that the Department of Social Development and particularly Minister Skweyiya voices our concern for children when he says that "children are everyone's business". We are together in the concern that both government and civil society look forward to a comprehensive form of legislation that will provide for an environment conducive to the well being, development and flourishing of children distinct from what we had witnessed under apartheid. For these reasons we make the calls in this submission trusting that the best foundation for legislation over the next decade that seeks to deal with children in need will be reached as speedily as is possible.

10 August 2007