2006 ANNUAL REPORT
PRESENTATION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY
MONDAY 19TH MARCH 2007
General
Overberg Water welcomes the opportunity to
address the Portfolio Committee and
to confirm its commitment not only to
compliance with national legislation but also
implementation of the relevant legislation in
accordance with the Constitution to
give effect to the committee’s powers of
“ scrutinizing and overseeing executive
action”. In doing so, Overberg
would like to stress that this presentation must be
viewed in conjunction with its Annual
Report, its 5 year Business Plan and its Policy
Document.
Perhaps a good starting point would be to reiterate the
fundamental principles of
our mission statement which in a
nutshell is “ to provide good quality
water
services at affordable prices and remain
economically viable”. This we feel we have
achieved and we would like to quote from DWAF’s financial appraisal of our 2006/7
Annual Report.
Finance
1. Audit
We have been fortunate to receive an unqualified report
from the Auditor General
a “Overall, Overberg’s
Income statement has improved significantly…”.
b. “…inspite of abnormal issues in
operating profit, Overberg has still managed to
perform relastively well over the past year.”
c. “ …an improvement of 534% over
last year excluding Klein Karoo”
“…profitability indicators all trending towards a healthy position.”
“Average cash balances are healthy
and probably exceeding target levels.”
Overberg regrets however, that the situation
at Klein Karoo has deteriorated the significantly since it was transferred to the
Municipality inspite of offers by Overberg
to assist in a monitoring/ mentoring capacity. Overberg
would like to state that our financial position could have been significantly
better except but we were instructed to change our investment policy, resulting
in a net loss of additional earnings of almost R4 million over the last three years
in spite of it being a very conservative and well managed portfolio. In the
long term such losses impact heavily on a small entity experiencing capital shortages
and we are currently awaiting treasury permission to reinstate our investment
portfolio strategy. We have no doubt that with careful management and
monitoring we will be able to build up much needed funds to lessen the burden
of infrastructure refurbishment and emergency reserves.
Equity:
Employment equity still remains high on the priority list
for Overberg , however we are having difficulty in finding suitably
qualified personnel at affordable salary scales. The scarcity of skilled applicants
has made this a very competitive market
with bigger Water Boards being able to
offer better and more lucrative packages. Not only are we battling to find
qualified staff to address our equity balance but we are also loosing qualified
staff to the private sector. Notwithstanding these difficulties, Overberg views this as only one of the many challenges that
it will seek to address in the year ahead and which it deals with both in the
annual report and the strategy policy. To this end Overberg
will be targeting local colleges to encourage young people to enter water
services as a possible career opportunity and via its HR department, facilitating
additional training and upgrading of skills. Overberg
is also taking advantage of skills development opportunities being offered by
certain foreign governments such as
Succession / Risk Management
Overberg’s strategy for succession is closely
aligned with its strategy to address equity imbalance and with National Policy
on employment equity. However, this also forms part and parcel of its overall
risk management and we are happy to report that we are well on the way to
finalizing a comprehensive Risk Management strategy which has entailed considerable
research by a top security company and an Auditing firm. Implementation is
already commencing and Overberg’s Audit Committee
functions optimally within the parameters of the legislation and regulations at
its disposal with credible results as can be seen from its report in the 2006
Annual Report.
It is perhaps significant to note that one of the assessment
observations made by the Auditor was the fact that Overberg’s
tariff structures for bulk water was lower than the national average. However,
management feels secure in the knowledge that this is a risk that can be
managed and will not impact negatively on Overberg’s
future performance. It is our sincere
wish that Municipalities pass on the benefits to the end users, thus providing
potable water to the masses at affordable prices in compliance with national
policy.
It is with deep regret that Overberg
once again has to report that although it has forged strong working
relationships with Municipalities in its area, there remains a reluctance
within the municipal structures to conclude long term contracts which will
enable Overberg Water to plan the way ahead more
efficiently and effectively and plan its maintenance and infrastructure
refurbishment programmes more cost effectively. To go
ahead with long term expansion and expenditure without such contractual
commitment would in our view be irresponsible and verging on mismanagement. We
feel strongly that perhaps it is time for DWAF and DPLG intervention and we are concerned that time is
running out for the likes of
The Waterskloof
and Hessequa where we have serious capacity
constraints with our current infrastructure. The upgrading may well create
economies of scale which it is hoped would be passed on to the end users and
free up additional capacity to meet the needs of the growing number of end
users.
This is of high priority to Overberg
and a further series of consultative meetings will be scheduled in the near
future to resolve this issue with particular reference to some of the
substantive issues raised by the municipalities.
Tariffs
The excellent performance of Overberg
Water in this financial year is in some respects due to the development of a
unique sliding scale model which serves to regulate the allocation of water
supplies and at the same time educates and encourages clients to be more
efficient in their use of what is fast becoming a scarce resource in the
Western Cape in particular and in South Africa in general.
Overberg’s tariffs to the
retail sector is highly competitive and as was mentioned earlier, its
bulk tariffs are lower than the national average. This is due primarily to the
innovative sliding scale system employed by Overberg
and the inclusive consultative processes set out by DWAF to which Overberg fully subscribes. Tariff policy is determined by
this and other relevant factors but always with a view to remaining viable in
order to continue delivering a high standard of potable water and service
excellence.
Since tariffs are the prime source of Overberg’s
income revenue it is of paramount importance that this income stream be well
protected and that clients are well informed during the consultative process.
However, our brief from DWAF is to remain viable and to control the escalation
of tariffs but above all to operate under good business principles and accepted
best practices. To this end, Overberg is proactively considering
alternative income streams which will boost income revenue without impacting
negatively on service delivery.
Alternative Income Streams
The Work for Water project is one of the alternative income
streams referred to and although it was initiated by DWAF it will be seen from
the Annual Report that Overberg has taken it to heart
and have maintained its record of service excellence. Our commitment is based
on DWAF research that eradication of 1000 ha of alien Vegetation from Rivier Sonderend will free up as
much water as Overberg currently has access to. At an
estimated cost of R4 million it is hard to accept that the funding is not
available, considering the water crises in the
There are several other income streams we are currently
investigating, such as better management of our resources and our fixed assets
which we have no doubt will generate the revenue that we need to comply with
all necessary legislation, deal with routine maintenance and upgrade infrastructure
as and when required. We will of course ensure that all such additional
non-core activities comply with the Water Services Act, the PFMA and other
legislation and that we obtain the necessary
permissions from the relevant government department but above all we will take
all necessary precautions that nothing will impact negatively on delivery of our
core functions.
Occupational Health and Safety
General onsite systems to cope with
daily workplace health and safety measures are in place at all the purification
plants as well as the various administration centres and
in each case dedicated personnel have been allocated the responsibility for implementation
and operation. Manuals on any given scenario with regard to procedures to follow, are being developed.
In addition Overberg has appointed two dedicated members of staff
( one at senior level) to participate in the DWAF / SAAWU initiative on HIV /
AIDS and we are happy to report that a pilot project for a Social Development programme will be put in place covering issues such as :-
Overberg would like to see the outcomes of
this project benefit the national aids programmme and
its final format being replicated to other areas.
Human Resource
As mentioned in the Annual report and elsewhere in this
document, Overberg is actively implementing National
Government policies relating to equity and skills development. We have also
taken advantage of programmes for further training in
water services and related issues and we are proactively engaging in schemes emanating
from both national and international institutions. To a large extent the overall
costs are covered by external funding programmes or
by local sponsorship.
Conclusion
Technically Overberg Water
operates well and provides a good product at affordable price thereby
fulfilling its core function while at the same time remaining stable and
viable, although not in a very strong position. We have been growing steadily
over the past 4 years and the indicators are that we will maintain this growth
mode for the next 4 years at least.
Finally I would like to assure the chair and the committee
that we are actively pursuing both the President’s and the chairperson’s pet
projects of bucket system eradication where it exists in our areas and in some
cases we are doing joint ventures with the private sector to facilitate
funding.