1.
The information below aims at justifying the three specific questions
raised by the NCOP Select Committee, as follows:
·
All conditional grants earmarked for
Mpumalanga Department of Education should be reduced because it has failed to
appear before the committee during the whole of last financial year (2006/07)
to respond on the performance of its conditional grants, majority of which are
under performing;
·
Reducing the school nutrition grant
of the
·
Reducing the HIV/Aids conditional
grant to
2.
Before the
spending performance of any of the provinces can be considered, the committee
should once again note the following:
·
A
once-off allocation of R200 million was made available for the NSNP conditional
grant in the 2005/06 Adjusted Estimates. Spending on this allocation was mainly
for once-off circumstances such as for the equipping of kitchens. Since the
additional allocation only came into effect as late as January 2006, it was not
possible for provinces to utilise all these funds before
Table 1: Expenditure
for 2005/06 in R’000 (1)
Province |
Original Allocation |
Additional R200 million |
Total Available Funds |
Total Expenditure |
|
194 288 53 817 83 006 198 849 167 836 70 235 24 628 79 357 40 135 |
43 314 11 747 18 118 43 402 36 633 15 330 5 375 17 321 8 760 |
237 602 65 564 101 124 242 251 204 469 85 565 30 003 96 678 48 895 |
213 019 60 628 91 580 198 980 191 072 76 479 28 770 107 072 49 336 |
Total |
912 151 |
200 000 |
1 112 151 |
1 016 936 |
Source: Department of Education Annual Report 2005 - 2006
·
Due
to grant-specific circumstances as well as the impact of the school calendar
year on spending patterns in provincial education departments, there would be
uneven spending in some programmes. This is as a result of a variety of
activities that are unevenly spread over the financial year. Consequently,
provinces experience “seasonal” spending trends, with the result that spending
should not be projected on a straight line basis.
3.
The
Department is not in a position to comment on the attendance of the provincial
MEC and the Head of the PED at committee meetings. However, the following
information is relevant to the spending record of the province in terms of the
current three education conditional grants:
NSNP:
2005/06:
For the 2005/06 financial year, the province spent 89,38% of the total grant
transfer (including their portion of the R200 million). This represents total
spending of 108,89% if the additional funds are excluded.
2006/07:
The province has spent 78,23% of the allocated funds as at
HIV/Aids:
2005/06:
During this period, the province spent 102,17% of the allocated budget for this
grant. The Department succeeded in raising awareness through training
programmes for educators and learners. Educators also received intensive training
during the financial year on how to support infected and affected learners.
2006/07:
The province has spent 86,45% per cent of the allocated budget as at
FET Colleges Recapitalisation:
2006/07:
Actual spending at
4.
NSNP:
2005/06:
For the 2005/06 financial year, the province spent 89,65% of the total grant
transfer (including their portion of the R200 million). This represents
total spending of 109,64% if the additional funds are excluded.
2006/07:
The province has spent 67,75% of the total transfer as at
5.
NSNP:
2005/06:
The province spent 110,75% of the total grant transfer (including their portion
of the R200 million). When the impact of the additional funds is excluded,
total spending was 135% of the original allocation.
2006/07: The province has spent 95,15%
of the allocated funds as at
6.
HIV/Aids:
2005/06:
The province spent 87,69% of the total grant.
2006/07: The province has spent
47,11% of the allocated funds as at
7.
HIV/Aids:
2005/06:
The province spent more than 100% of the total grant and utilised normal voted
funds to conclude all programmes during the year.
2006/07: The province has spent 63,93%
of the allocated funds as at