DRAFT REPORT-ON THE IMPACT OF
THE EQUALITY ACT ON THE LIVES OF WOMEN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES - GENDER
SECTOR
12 December
2006
Prepared by the Research Unit, Parliament of South Africa
Table
of contents
Executive
Summary
1. Introduction
2. Key themes emanating from the review
2.1. Inequality on the basis of gender
2.1.1. Income inequality
2.1.2.
Equal access to land and property
2.1.3. Gender-based violence
2.1.4. Institutional mechanisms aimed at promoting gender equality
2.1.5 Women in decision making positions
3. Conclusion
4. Recommendations
Bibliography
Executive
Summary
Section 9 of
the Constitution provides for the enactment of national legislation to prevent
and prohibit unfair discrimination, and to promote the achievement of equality.
The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (No.4 of
2000), also known as the 'Equality Act', was passed to give effect to this
constitutional requirement by prohibiting practices that perpetuate inequality,
and by" promoting equality in all spheres of South African life.
Recognising that this year marks the tenth anniversary of the passing of the
Constitution, Parliament embarked on a process to review the impact of the Equality
Act on the lives of women and people with disabilities. The Equality Review
Campaign consisted of a desktop study on the impact of the Equality Act as well
as a series of hearings and oversight visits hosted in the main by the Joint
Monitoring Committee on Improvement of Quality of Life and Status of Women and
the Joint Monitoring Committee on Improvement of Quality of Life and Status of
Children, Youth and Disabled Persons. The main findings emanating from the
review process include the following:
Inequality on the basis of gender
Income inequality
The review revealed that discrimination and inequity remain common in South
African society, with contributors arguing that women's continuing inequality
is attested to by the very high levels of gender-based violence in South
Africa, and the fact that women constitute "the majority of the poor, the
homeless, the jobless and the dispossessed". Initiatives to achieve both
the prevention and elimination of unfair discrimination and the promotion of
equality have not sufficed in eliminating the scourge of inequity from South
African society. It has further been argued that this problem is particularly
exacerbated in rural areas due to a lack of resources and infrastructure.
The review highlighted the fact that income inequality between men and women
because of the concentration of women in lower-paid, temporary or casual
employment, or employment in the informal sector. The majority of women in South Africa, particularly black women, are poor. Chapter 5 of the Equality Act provides
that Ministers must ensure that legislation and policies for which they are
responsible do not perpetuate inequality. It further provides that appropriate
laws and policies be put in place with a view to eliminating unfair
discrimination. As far as employment equity is concerned, the legislation and
policies envisaged in Chapter 5 of the Equality Act are in place. The
mechanisms for monitoring progress in this regard have also been put in place,
although the Department of Labour is experiencing difficulties in getting
companies to comply with equity targets, and to comply with reporting
requirements.
Access
to land
The review further found that, while there is formal commitment in South Africa to gender equity in land reform, implementation of land reform programmes
remains a problem. The pace of land delivery to the previously disadvantaged
South Africans is relatively low when one considers the fact that approximately
4% of land has been delivered to black people since 1995. It has further been
argued that the absence of a strong lobby for land rights among rural women and
strength of patriarchal attitudes and practices in society meant that
implementation of land rights for women received far less attention. In
addition, there is lack of knowledge of their rights to land brought about by
land reform programme among rural women.
The fact that many women are unable to own land and housing also emerged as key
impediments to enhancing the quality of their lives, and negatively impacts on
their economic status and on equality in general. In addition, if the land
transferred to women is not suitable for agricultural purposes, for example,
then gendered poverty, as a manifestation of inequality, has not been
addressed. Unless women have access to support that will enable them to utilise
land transferred to them, including training and credit, the transfer runs the
risk of becoming meaningless.
The review also suggests that the implementation of legislation has been weak
because of challenges with regard to the skills of land reform implementers,
the appointment of dedicated staff with gender skills, the development of
gender sensitive grant and credit systems and gender sensitive communication
strategies as well as promoting the development of women commercial farmers.
Gender-based violence
Violence against women and gender-based violence (including rape, domestic
violence, female genital mutilation, murder and sexual abuse) is a common
phenomenon in South Africa, and, according to many observers, indicative of
women's unequal status in society. A study published by the Medical Research
Council in 2004 indicated that every six hours, a South African woman is killed
by her intimate partner.
The most important legislative measures aimed at combating gender-based
violence are the Domestic Violence Act (Act No. 116 of 1998), but the implementation
of this Act has proven to be challenging. There is a lack of dedicated
resources for combating gender-based violence and for the protection of
survivors of such violence. Furthermore, the review suggested that problematic
attitudes on the side of police officials and court personnel present a major
challenge for persons reporting gender-based violence, as these officials often
see gender-based violence not as a criminal matter, but a domestic issue.
It has been suggested that domestic violence is increasingly perceived as
unacceptable. However, submissions to the review indicated that where physical
violence from a partner has abated, it has often been accompanied by an
increase in emotional abuse. This gives rise to further complications,
according to another submission, as magistrates do not appear to apply the
definitions of concepts such as emotional and economic abuse consistently.
These issues point not only to the need for greater and sustained public
awareness on gender-based violence, but also continued focus on strengthening
the implementation of the legislation aimed at protecting women.
Institutional
mechanisms aimed at promoting gender equality
All the phases
of the review examined the manner in which institutional mechanisms established
to promote equality have contributed to greater equality. What has emerged is
that the establishment of Gender Focal Points (GFPs) in line with the
provisions of the National Policy Framework for Women's Empowerment and Gender
Equality continues to generate cause for concern. The level at which GFPs are
appointed impacts negatively on the skills these positions are able to attract,
and on the effectiveness of this work at provincial and local level. While
structures are in place in many provinces and local government, the national
gender machinery is not functioning as effectively as envisaged. It also became
clear that the monitoring process has been hampered by insufficient and
inappropriate information being provided by officials.
Women
in decision-making positions
South Africa has made significant strides
in increasing the numbers of women in decision-making, particularly in
government and Parliament. In terms of rankings determined by the
Inter-Parliamentary Union, South Africa ranked 13th in the world in relation to
the number of woman Members of Parliament. There are currently 131 woman
Members in the National Assembly, and 19 woman Members in the National Council
of Provinces.
In addition, various forums have been established within Parliament to deal
with gender issues. These include the multi-party Women's Parliamentary Caucus,
the Joint Monitoring Committee on the Improvement of Quality of Life and Status
of Women, and the Women's Empowerment Unit, which is located in the Speakers'
Forum.
In relation to government departments, the review indicated that a number of
departments are doing relatively well in terms of its ratio of women to men
both in positions of leadership and in departments generally. However, the
organisational profile of most State structures and private sector
organisations is skewed in favour of men, particularly in positions of
decision-making. Sexual harassment also remains a critical issue, as is the
development of a gender sensitive organisation ethos, culture and practices.
Issues
for consideration and recommendations
In light of the insights emanating from the -review process, the JMC makes a
number of recommendations, including the following:
The second phase of the Equality Review Campaign commenced during September 2006, and unlike the process followed in phase one, had a more narrow focus on the Equality Act. Phase two involved the following activities:
In
addition to conducting a review, Parliament has also initiated a process to
popularise the Equality Act. This final report on the Impact of the Equality
Act will be tabled and debated at the 'start of 2007. "
2.
Key themes emanating from the review
In terms of
the Equality Act, equality is defined to include equality both in law and the achievement
of equal outcomes. The Act is therefore committed to ensuring equal outcomes
for disadvantaged groups, namely "substantive equality" as opposed to
requiring that privileged and disadvantaged groups be treated in an identical
manner in all circumstances. The broad definition of discrimination in the Act
encompasses unequal socio-economic conditions arising from prohibited
discrimination. Discrimination in the Act includes any act or omission,
including a policy, law, rule, practice, condition or situation that either
imposes disadvantages or withholds benefits and opportunities from any person
on one or more of the prohibited grounds. The Act seeks to prevent the
perpetuation of systemic disadvantage, the undermining of human dignity and all
actions that adversely affect the equal enjoyment of a person's rights and
freedoms.
A number of submissions made during the review attest to the fact that
discrimination and inequity remain common in South African society. One of the
submissions to the review process argued, for example, that women's. continuing
inequality is attested to by the very high levels of gender-based violence in
South Africa, and the fact that women constitute "the majority of the
poor, the homeless, the jobless and the dispossessed".3 While there are a
number of benefits associated with related institutional mechanisms and
practical initiatives that have been established to achieve both
the,.pravention and elimination of unfair discrimination and the promotion of
equality, it has become clear through the review process that these initiatives
have not sufficed in eliminating the scourge of inequity from South African.
society. According to a submission by the South African Human Rights Commission
(SAHRC), this problem is particularly exacerbated in rural areas due to a lack
of resources and infrastructure. The SAHRC noted that women in farming areas
are often not taken seriously by police when they complain about gender based,
violence, while access to health care services remains limited due to long
distances that farm workers have to travel to clinics, and due to restrictions
on their movements imposed by employers.
2.1.
Inequality on the basis of gender
The Equality Act prohibits unfair discrimination by either the State or any person
on the basis of gender, which includes:
The
review highlighted the fact that a number of challenges still exist that
prevent women from being equal with men in the political, economic and social
realms of life. Although many submissions pertain to other pieces of
legislation such as the Domestic Violence' Act, the Maintenance Act and the
Customary Marriages Act, it is important to note that the submissions made in
this regard have critical implications for gender equity and therefore do
relate to equality more holistically. In reviewing the status of equality in South Africa, it is therefore important to engage with these related pieces of legislation.
2.1.1. Income inequality
In the South African context, the promotion of equality is still plagued by
significant challenges. Income inequality, for example, is still a key feature
of South African society because of the trend towards employing more skilled
labour, job shedding in the formal economy and the low employment capacity of
the economy. The South African society is therefore characterised by
inequalities and disadvantages that arise as a direct result of poverty. The
South African economic landscape is characterised by the fact that many
employees earn less than R1000 per month. For example, almost a quarter of
formal sector workers, approximately 76.3% of informal sector workers and 90%
of domestic workers fit into this income category.
The unemployment problem is coupled with the fact that amongst. the ranks of
those who are employed, there is great disparity and inequity in how people are
remunerated. This problem also has gendered dimensions in that women are often
located in low-paying jobs. This is largely because the gendered roles
traditionally ascribed to women by society, are not socially valued and
rewarded in monetary terms. It is important to note that although women are not
a homogenous group, the majority of women in South Africa, particularly black
women, are poor. The submissions reveal how poor women, such as women living on
farms and elderly women, are rendered particularly vulnerable. Once again, the
submission by the SAHRC indicated that, during workshops hosted to discuss the
Older Persons Bill, the Commission was told of instances where older women in
rural areas are attacked because they are believed to be witches.
Significant indicators of employment inequity have been revealed in the course
of the equality review. Census 2001 statistics, for example, show that in South Africa, more males are employed as permanent workers. In 2000, the percentage
difference between males permanently employed as compared to women in the same
category was 2.8%. In 2002, this figure increased to 3.6%.7 In addition, the
proportion of female workers employed as temporary workers is higher than that
for male workers. At least 14.3% women in South Africa are employed as temporary
workers as compared to 11.1 % in 2002. Women are poorly represented in the
"craft and related trades" category of employees. There are 14.76%
women as compared to 85% men employed in this category. Of the total 515 390
persons (5.37% of the total work force) employed as "legislators, senior
officers and managers", 29.55% are women, as compared to "70.44%
males. This is slightly lower than the 30% national minimum standard for women
in decision-making positions.
One of the major challenges in assessing progress with regard to the advancement
of women in the employment sector is that some companies do not submit
employment equity reports to the Department of Labour. This makes it difficult
to obtain a true reflection of the impact of government policies and
legislation in terms of equal opportunities in the workplace. Despite many
initiatives, women's position in the economy remains weak. Job insecurity and
low employment levels affect women. As was documented in the desktop study that
formed part of the review of the Equality Act, more women are still employed as
casual, seasonal and temporary workers. Also the majority of women in South Africa enter the labour force at the lowest positions. This contributes in part to
the low representation of women in management.
Women have not fully entered traditionally male dominated spheres of
employment. Ten years after the promulgation of the Employment Equity Act (Act
No. 55 of 1998), the top positions in the private sector are still male
dominated, proving that intervention is still required to change the situation.
According to the report by the Commission on Employment Equity for 2002/3, a
review of employment reports received and information gathering through site
visits show that there is slow progress in the implementation of the Employment
Equity Act (EEA). However, a gradual increase of women in top and senior
management positions has been noted. The Department of Labour will provide
awards of excellence for companies who have successfully implemented Employment
Equity in order to provide incentives for other companies to follow suit.
Some companies appoint women in top positions just for window dressing and are
not involved in decision-making. This implies that there is a need for
monitoring and support mechanism provided for promotions of women in order to
refute notions of tokenism and window dressing. There is a risk that EEA will
empower an elite group of blacks and women, further entrenching class
inequalities in South Africa. The challenge is to ensure that empowerment benefits
the majority of black women. Shortage of skills among women makes it difficult
to get enough suitable women to fill top positions in companies. It is hoped
that Skills Development Act of 1998 will facilitate the implementation of the
EEA.
Chapter 5 of the Equality Act provides that Ministers must ensure that
legislation and policies for which they are responsible do not perpetuate inequality.10
It further provides that appropriate laws and policies be put in place with a
view to eliminating unfair discrimination.11 As far as employment equity is
concerned, the legislation and policies envisaged in Chapter 5 of the Equality
Act are in place. The mechanisms for monitoring progress in this regard have
also been put in place, although the Department of Labour is experiencing
difficulties in getting companies to comply with equity targets, and to comply
with reporting requirements.
2.1.2.
Equal access to land and property
While there is
formal commitment in South Africa to gender equity in land reform, which has
created an opportunity for women to own land in their own right, implementation
of land reform programmes remains a problem. Due to lack of data that
disaggregates land reform in terms of gender; it is difficult to assess the
rate of women getting access to land. However, there is movement towards
addressing women's access to land in South Africa as shown by the increase in
the number of women benefiting from the Land Redistribution for Agricultural
Development Policy (LRAD). 2 In addition, in 1999, a landmark judgment handed
down by the Land Claims Court confirmed that a woman living on a farm had independent
rights of occupation in terms of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act (ESTA,
Act No. 62 of 1997) and could not summarily be evicted as a consequence of the
lawful eviction of her husband.13 These developments show the enabling space
created by the Constitution and legislation for furthering women's rights.
However, the review revealed that the pace of land delivery to the previously
disadvantaged South Africans is relatively low when one considers the fact that
approximately 4% of land has been delivered to black people since 1995.14 It
has further been argued that the level of mobilisation among rural women in
support of their rights is very low.15 The absence of a strong lobby for land
rights among rural women and strength of patriarchal attitudes and practices in
society meant that implementation of land rights for women received far less
attention. In addition there is lack of knowledge among rural women of their
rights to land in terms of the land reform programme.
The fact that many women are unable to own land and housing also emerged as key
impediments to enhancing the quality of their lives, and negatively impacts on
their economic status and on equality in general. The feminisation of poverty
has significantly impacted upon women's lack of access to land and housing. A
submission from the Department of Land Affairs brings to the fore substantive
challenges that urgently need to be addressed in order to change this
situation. These include the skilling of land reform implementers, the appointment
of dedicated staff with gender skills, the development of gender sensitive
grant and credit systems, provision for the development of women commercial
farmers in the capital budget, and the development of gender sensitive
education strategies and information dissemination systems.
A submission made by the Women's Legal Centre noted that customary law and
traditional practices could impact negatively on women's equality. The
submission pointed out that while the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act is
meant to protect women who are married in these terms, many women are not aware
of the protective measures offered by the legislation. In some cases,
institutions such as banks do not recognise the contracts entered into on the
basis of a customary marriage, which suggests that women in customary or religious
marriages still experience discrimination. A further submission suggested that
the obstacles that impede upon women's right to inherit land and property and
women's rights in the context of polygamous relationships emerged as issues
that warrant monitoring and intervention where necessary.
The review further suggests that the implementation of legislation has been
weak because there is lack of enforcement mechanisms, especially in the area of
evictions. The Department of Land Affairs has reviewed EST A and the Land
Reform (Labour Tenants) Act (Act NO.3 of 1996) in order to remove loopholes in
the legislation and to ensure that the rights of people on farms are protected.
According to the programme of the Department, a new Bill was meant to be introduced
to the cabinet before the end of 2006. Finally, it must be noted that the gross
numerical indicators presented as measures of delivery say nothing about the
quality of land that has been transferred and what benefits people may be
gaining from this land. If the land transferred to women is not suitable for
agricultural purposes, for example, then gendered poverty, as a manifestation
of inequality, has not been addressed. During hearings held by the JMCs in
August 2006, it was pointed out that unless women have access to support that
will enable them to utilise land transferred to them, including training and
credit, the transfer runs the risk of becoming meaningless.
2.1.3.
Gender-based violence
Violence against women and gender-based violence (including rape, domestic
violence, female genital mutilation, murder and sexual abuse) is a common
phenomenon in South Africa. South African women of all races and income levels
face abuse from their partners. However, because police statistics do not
distinguish domestic violence cases from other assaults, the exact levels of
domestic violence are not known. A study published by the Medical Research
Council in 2004 indicated that every six hours, a South African woman is killed
by her intimate partner.
The difficulty in determining the extent of the problem of domestic violence is
increased by the fact that most women abused by their partners do not seek help
outside network of family and friends.18 The reluctance of women to report
domestic violence stems from a number of reasons, including, distrust of the
legal and law enforcement system, economic dependence, fear of retaliation,
self-blame, children or even love.
A number of provisions in the Constitution aim to protect women's rights either
expressly or by implication. For example, section 9 states that "everyone
is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of
the law". Sections 10 and 11 guarantees to everyone the right to life and
the right to have their dignity respected and protected. Section 12 states that
"everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity",
including the right "to be free from all forms of violence from either
public or private sources".
The most important legislative measures aimed at combating gender-based
violence are the Domestic Violence Act (Act No. 116 of 1998) and the Criminal
Procedure Second Amendment Act (Act NO.85 of 1997). The Domestic Violence Act
recognises that domestic violence is a serious obstacle to achieving gender
equality. The Act offers protection to any victim of domestic violence (Le.
physical or mental abuse) who is or was in a domestic relationship with an
abuser. It also places a duty on members of the South African Police Service
(SAPS) to inform a victim of his or her rights at the scene of the violence and
requires the National Commissioner of the SAPS to issue national guidelines,
which must be observed when dealing with domestic violence. The Criminal
Procedure Second Amendment Act effected further amendments to the bail laws to
ensure that persons who are accused of committing serious offences are not
released on bail. This relates to offences where women and children are the
victims.
South Africa has recognised violence as a health and human rights issue, and
has instituted a number of programmes to combat the scourge. Additional
programmes have been put in place following the release of the World Report on
Violence and Health, a report that came about as a result of a motion tabled by
South Africa in 1996 at the World Health Assembly.
Critical to the successful implementation of this legislation is the
integration of services provided by the participating departments (including
Justice, SAPS, Social Development). The cluster approach to cross-sectoral
matters has proven a useful tool in managing the rigorous demands of this
legislation. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have also played an
important role in both monitoring the implementation of legislation and
providing essential services to survivors of violence.
Attempts have also been made to make justice more accessible to survivors of
gender-based violence, and to provide protective infrastructure for such women
and their children. Family Court Centres, for example, deal with maintenance
cases, children's cases and domestic violence issues. These Courts have been
designed primarily to make them accessible and sensitive to the needs of the
community. They operate according to simple, appropriate procedures; offer
counselling and mediation support services and provide quality service in a
pleasant, user-friendly environment. .
Pilot family courts have been established in Port Elizabeth, Johannesburg, Durban, Cape Town,8Rd Lebowakgomo. The pilot sites are monitored on a regular basis. In
its 2004/05 budget, the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development
undertook to use some of the additional funds received for vulnerable groups to
legislate the family court concept in 2004 and to extend the five pilot sites
to other sites.
The Department of Social Development has established a number of one-stop
service centres for the protection of survivors of gender-based violence. The
aim is to ensure that all services required by - victims of domestic violence
would be offered in one building. These include special trained police, health
care, courts, counselling and support from government social workers and NGOs,
shelter and other secondary services like training in employment skills from
the Department of Labour. In its 2005 Annual report, the Department indicated
that one-stop service centres had been established in the Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga and Northern Cape; the 2006 Annual report does not indicate the establishment of
any additional centres.
The implementation of the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act has proved to
be challenging. The JMC on the Improvement of Quality of Life and Status of
Women in Parliament undertook study tours to all the nine Provinces between
2000 and 2003 as part of its oversight function. The tours were specifically
geared towards collecting and collating information from roleplayers such as
magistrates, prosecutors, non-governmental organisations and police officers on
problems they have experienced with the implementation of the Domestic Violence
Act.
Among the challenges that have been identified by stakeholders is the fact that
there is a lack of dedicated resources for combating gender-based violence and
for the protection of survivors of such violence. Furthermore, Parliament has
received reports that problematic attitudes on the side of police officials and
court personnel present a major challenge for persons reporting gender-based
violence, as these officials often see gender-based violence not as a criminal
matter, but a domestic issue. In addition, it has been reported that many women
are not aware of their rights in terms of the Act, and that they are prevented
from applying for protection orders because application forms are only
available in English and Afrikaans. Another submission highlighted the fact
that limited literacy, especially among rural women, made it more difficult for
these women to make use of the protective measures provided for in the Domestic
Violence Act.
In August 2004, the Sexual Offences and Community Affairs (SaCA) Unit in the
office of the National Director of Public Prosecutions made a presentation to
the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development.19 The
presentation partly focused on challenges experienced with the implementation
of the Domestic Violence Act. These challenges largely mirror those raised by
role-players during the domestic violence hearings held by the Joint Monitoring
Committee on the Improvement of Quality of Life and Status of Women.
One of the findings from research done by the Commission on Gender Equality
(CGE) was that whereas domestic violence was more tolerated in the past, since
the passing of DV A there are indications that this behaviour is no longer
perceived as acceptable and therefore normative.2o However, during the hearings
held in August, one of the submissions indicated that where physical violence
from a partner has abated, it has often been accompanied by an increase in
emotional abuse.21 This gives rise to further complications, according to
another submission, as magistrates do not appear to apply the definitions of
concepts such as emotional and economic abuse consistently.
Beside injury, disability and death, violence against women is also
increasingly being associated with the risk of physical and mental health
problems. These include the risk of pregnancy, depression, anxiety disorders,
substance abuse, chronic pain, miscarriage and teenage pregnancy, as well as
contracting HIV or other Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs). When the number
of cases 01\1 domestic violence has drop it will mean reduction in the above
physical and psychological consequences associated with domestic violence.
Theorists on gender-based violence have long argued that violence against women
is inextricably linked to women's unequal status in society. Addressing issues
of equality, therefore, should impact on public perceptions of gender-based
violence as well as the resources made available to combat this scourge. It has
not been possible, through this review, to determine exactly what the impact of
the Equality Act has been on the incidence of gender based violence in South Africa. However, comments relating to the nature and impact of public awareness
campaigns around equality would apply: as recently as November 2006, a South
African working in the field of domestic violence suggested that short-lived
campaigns such as the "16 Days of Activism Against Violence Against
Women" were not effective in reducing the incidence of such violence.23 A
number of the submissions made to the JMCs during June have highlighted the
fact that the implementation of protective legislation falls short of the mark.
Calls were made for more sustained campaigns to raise awareness on gender-based
violence. In addition, submissions recommended that police officials and
magistrates be given further training on the application of laws such as the
Domestic Violence Act in order to ensure that when women seek protection
against abuse, they are, in fact, protected.
2.1.4.
Institutional mechanisms aimed at promoting qender equality
All the phases
of the review examined the manner in which institutional mechanisms established
to promote equality have contributed to greater equality. The establishment of
Gender Focal Points (GFPs) in line with the provisions of the National Policy
Framework for Women's Empowerment and Gender Equality continues to generate
cause for concern. Although the GFPs are not established in terms of the
provisions of the Equality Act but in terms of the National Policy Framework,
this policy could serve as an important tool for giving effect to the
provisions of the Act. The JMC on Improvement of Quality of Life and Status of
Women has recognised the importance of reviewing and monitoring the
establishment of GFPs in all government departments. The JMC has regularly
exercised its monitoring responsibility in this regard, with the most recent
hearings in Parliament taking place in August 2005. The JMC also undertook an
oversight visit to Limpopo Province in October 2006 with the purpose of
monitoring the implementation of the National Gender Policy Framework.
The hearings held by the JMC in 2005 revealed that the Department of Provincial
and Local Government has exceeded the employment equity target set in relation
to women. By June 2005, 36.4% of its employees were women. At the South African
Local Government Association, on the other hand, only one out of nine Deputy
CEOs is a woman, while three out of 14 members of the Executive Management Team
are women. The 2004 Local Government Gender Audit, undertaken by the SALGA,
revealed that there were 54 (or 19.01%) women mayors, 77 (or 27.11%) women
speakers and 18 (or 6.34%) women municipal mangers in the country.
The Western Cape and Gauteng did not have an Office on the Status of Women
(OSW), but indicated that various departments and directorates were doing the
work of an OSW. The JMC further heard that, according to the National OSW June
2006 survey conducted amongst national departments, all 30 responding
departments/government agencies had appointed GFPs, albeit at different
management levels. It was also told that the National OSW Audit Report of 2003
had indicated that 31.03% (Le. 9) departments had appointed GFPs at the
mandated levels in 2003. There was thus a 7.7% drop (from 31.03% to 23.33%) in
the number of government departments complying with the mandate of the gender
policy document and Cabinet Memo of 1997. The Limpopo Province indicated that
at most municipalities, gender focal points did not exist, while Mpumalanga OSW
reported that GFP coordinators had been appointed in all 10 departments of the
Province.
Participants at the hearings noted that GFPs are being made responsible for
work on HIV, disability, children and the elderly, which was not in keeping
with the National Gender Policy Framework. They therefore argued that, if this
was to continue, departments and local government must allocate adequate funds
for the programmes that GFP.s are expected to manage.
During the August 2005 hearings, the JMC found that the overall quality of
information provided by Provincial OSWS ',and Provincial GFPs for Local
Government to the hearings was often misdirected and did not contain the depth
of detail that the JMC required. Similarly, when the JMC conducted its
oversight visit in October 2006, it was found that presentations from officials
often did not contain the information that the JMC needed to carry out its
mandate.
The oversight visit further revealed that the level at which GFPs are appointed
impacts negatively on the skills these positions are able to attract, and on
the effectiveness of this work at provincial and local level. Emphasis was also
put on the importance of ensuring that gender machinery structures are established
in line with the National Gender Policy Framework. "
What has emanated from different processes during the equality review therefore
suggests that, while structures are in place in many provinces, the national
gender machinery is not functioning as effectively as envisaged. It also became
clear that the monitoring process has been hampered by insufficient and
inappropriate information being provided by officials. The JMC recognised that
it might have to be much more prescriptive in the manner in which it seeks
information from government departments.
2.1.5.
Women in decision-makinq positions
Globally, the
participation and representation of women in decision-making is very poor. Of
the total 43 945 Members of Parliament (MP's), only about 6 953 (16.1 %) are
women.25 Only 27 of them preside over one of the Houses of the 187 existing
Parliaments across the globe, 73 of which are bicameral.
However, South Africa has made significant strides in increasing the numbers of
women in decision-making, particularly in government and Parliament. Over the
past eleven years of democracy, the numbers of women elected int,O public
office at national and provincial levels have inGreased significantly. In terms
of rankings determined by the Inter-Parliamentary Union, South Africa ranked
13th in the world in relation to the number of woman Members of Parliament.26
There are currently 131 woman Members in the National Assembly, and 19 woman
Members in the National Council of Provinces.
Since 1994, a number of positive changes have taken place to ensure gender
equality and the improvement of the lives of women in Parliament. These include
changes in parliamentary procedures that have a direct effect on women. Such
changes include recess being aligned with school holidays; an increase in the
basic infrastructure facilities for women; gender-sensitive language used in
legislation; and Parliamentary sessions commencing and ending earlier than
before 1994 to allow Members of Parliament to spend more quality time with
their families.
In addition, various forums have been established within Parliament to deal
with gender issues. These include:
In
relation to government departments, the review indicated that a number of
departments are doing relatively well in terms of its ratio of women to men
both in positions of leadership and in departments generally. However, the
organisational profile of most State structures and private sector
organisations is skewed in favour of men, particularly in positions of
decision-making. For example, in the South Africa private sector, women
comprise 41 % of the South African paid labour force but only 14.7% of
executive managers and 7.1 % of directors in the country. Focusing more
holistically on equality issues in the workplace, there are still a number of
obstacles that impede upon women's participation and well-being in their places
of work. Sexual harassment remains a critical issue, as is the development of a
gender sensitive organisation ethos, culture and practices.
3. Conclusion
Twelve years into democracy, South Africa still faces a number of
challenges in ensuring the prevention of unfair discrimination and promoting
equality, thereby achieving the consolidation of democracy in our country. The
Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act seeks the
realisation of a vision of equality, which should result in the consolidation
of our democracy. The Act requires action both to prevent unfair discrimination
and to promote substantive equality. The Report on the Impact of the Equality
Act on the lives of Women and People with Disabilities identifies, and gives
recognition to key legislation that, in addition to the Equality Act, has made
significant contributions to improving the quality of lives of women and people
with disabilities. Such legislation includes, amongst others, the Domestic
Violence Act, the Employment Equity Act and the Extension of Security of Tenure
Act. However, the detailed Annexures to the Report also recognise that in some
instances this legislation needs to be strengthened, while others such as the
Film and Publications Act, are regarded as providing an antithesis to the
Equality Act. In respect of this, the argument suggests that the legalisation
of certain material of pornographic nature, detract from women's right to
dignity and respect. This issue obviously raises a significant challenge facing
South African legislators, i.e. how to reconcile the individual's right to
freedom of expression with the Constitutional obligation to prevent unfair discrimination
and promoting equality.
The review process also highlights a critical, yet often unstated reality, i.e.
that women are not a homogeneous group, and that while the current review
process seeks to determine the impact of the Equality Act on all women, some
women are more vulnerable than others. Submissions reveal that public officials
and service providers often treat women on farms, the elderly, and people with
disabilities in a disrespectful manner. Furthermore, some of the submissions
suggest that the justice system appears to be unfriendly towards the elderly
and people with disabilities. In the case of farm workers, the intolerance and
lack of service they experience appear to stem from their socio-economic
status. Section 33 of the Equality Act clearly articulates that special
consideration should be given to, amongst other, socio-economic status, as
prohibited grounds for discrimination.
It is important to note that Chapter 5 of the Equality Act places a duty on all
government departments to develop and implement equality plans, and for the
Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development to pass regulations requiring
similar equality plans from private institutions. While some of the legislation
discussed in the Report was promulgated before the Equality Act, it can be
interpreted against the background of the provisions of the latter Act. The
assessment of these legislative measures carried out through the review
process, therefore, sheds light on the manner in which the Equality Act has
contributed to mainstreaming issues of equality on the basis of gender and
disability in their work. It becomes evident through the submissions to the two
Joint Monitoring Committees that the appropriation of adequate government
resources for related initiatives continues to be a significant challenge.
Furthermore, the lack of internal systems and appropriate structures in
government departments for channelling this work remains a serious constraint.
The fact that Regulations to the Equality Act have not been passed has also
meant that departments have not been compelled to comply with the requirements
set out in Chapter 5 of the Act. The result of these shortcomings is reflected
in the inability of many government departments to achieve equality targets in
terms of training and employment of women and persons with disabilities.
While the utilisation of mechanisms such as the Equality Court has been
limited, the cases already brought before the "court, and the remedies
available to complainants, suggest that if the Court is fully functional, and
if the barriers to accessing justice are removed, it could be a crucial tool
with which to express ordinary South Africans' right to equality. The existence
of designated Equality Courts is not necessarily a measure of their effective
functioning. It is critical that there is public awareness of the court's
existence, and it is critically important that ordinary people have access to
the court through the appropriate legal assistance.
The Equality Act provides for the development of plans and programmes that will
promote equality through all government departments and public institutions; it
also provides for similar measures to be applied to private institutions. Once
again, these could be powerful mechanism through which to advance substantive
equality. It is crucial therefore, that the entire Act is implemented, and that
Parliament ensures that it is informed regularly on the implementation of the
provisions contained in Chapter 5. Finally, the South African Human Rights
Commission and the Commission on Gender Equality must play their role fully as
watchdog bodies over the realisation of the right to equality. In addition,
these constitutional institutions can raise public awareness on progress made
by both the public and private sectors with regard to practical plans for achieving
greater equality in South Africa.
4.
Recommendations
In light of
the insights emanating from the review process, the JMC makes certain
recommendations. These recommendations are as follows:
Bibliography
Commission on
Gender Equality. No date.. Gender -based violence research in Gauteng: a
proposed partnership of the CGE and civil society organisations working in the
Gender-Based Violence Sector.
Department of Justice and Constitutional development. Equality for AI/.
Brochure (Undated).
Hassid, S. 2000. South Africa: A Strategic Ascent. Political Studies: University of Witwatersrand.
Human Rights Watch. 1995. South Africa - The State Response to Domestic
Violence and Rape.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2005. http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm.
Makani-Mansomi, Berenice; Nogenga Yolisa & Watson, Joy. 2006. Draft report
on the Impact of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair
Discrimination Act (No.4 of 2000) (Equality Act) on Women and Persons with
Disabilities. Report tabled at the people's Assembly, Oudtshoorn, 15 September
2006.
Office of the National Director of Public Prosecutions (SOCA Unit): Report on
the development of legislation and its impact on the lives of women 10 years
post democracy, undated.
Office on the Status of Women. 2004. Women in Political and DecisionMaking
Positions in South Africa.
Parliament of South Africa. 2006. Report of the public hearings on the impact
of the Promotion Of Equality And Prevention Of Unfair Discrimination Act (Act
NO.4 of 2000) on women and people with disabilities (16-19 October 2006).
Parliament of South Africa. 2006. Draft Report of The Joint Monitoring
Committee on the Improvement of Quality of Life and Status of Women, Limpopo
and Mpumalanga, October 2006.
Pepeteka, T and Abrahams, F. 2006. Review of Equality Legislation in South Africa the impact on the lives of women. Research Brief: Parliament of South Africa.
Research Unit Brief, Violence Against Women, 2 August 2002.
Seed at, S (Compiler). Equality Courts. A report of PIMS-SA at Idasa (Undated).
http://www.silentwitness.net/sub/latest-research.html
South Africa's National Policy Framework for Women's Empowerment and Gender
Equality.
Walker, C. 2002a. Agrarian Change, Gender and Land Reform: A South African
case study. Social Policy and Development Programme Paper NO.1 O. UNRISD.
Walker, C. 2002b. Land Reform in Southern and Eastern Africa: key issues for
strengthening women's access to and rights in land.
Watson, Joy, Nogenga, Y & Makani-Mansomi, B. 2006. Draft report on the
Impact of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act
(No.4 of 2000) (Equality Act) on Women and Persons with Disabilities. Report
submitted to the People's Assembly, Oudtshoorn, September 2006.
i Note that this report (focusing on gender) forms part of a comprehensive
report on the Impact of the Equality Act on the lives of women and people with
disabilities.
18