National Assembly and National Council of Provinces Parliament of South Africa Joint Coordinating Committee on the African Peer Review Mechanism

A Response to the African Peer Review Mechanism Self-Assessment Questionnaire Synopsis

For a copy of the full report, please consult Parliament’s website: http://www.parliament.gov.za

Contents
 
 Foreword
  Introduction
 
 Democracy and Good Political Governance
  Methodology
 
 Limitations
 
 Key findings and recommendations

International Codes and Standards Objective 1: Prevention and reduction of intra- and inter-state conflict

Objective 2: Constitutional democracy, including periodic political competition and opportunity for choice, the rule of law, citizen rights and supremacy of the Constitution

Objective 3: Promotion and protection of economic, social and cultural rights, civil and political rights as enshrined in African and international human instruments”

Objective 4: Uphold the separation of powers, including the protection of the independence of the judiciary and of an effective legislature

Objective 5: Ensure accountable, efficient and effective public office holders and civil servants

Objective 6: Fighting corruption in the political sphere 13

Objective 7: Promotion and protection of the rights of women” 14

Objective 8: Promotion and protection of the rights of children and young persons

Objective 9: Promotion and protection of the rights of vulnerable persons, including internally displaced persons and refugees

Economic Governance and Management Limitations and Challenges of the Committee Key Findings and Recommendations

International codes and standards Objective 1: Promote macro-economic policies that support sustainable development

Objective 2: Implement sound, transparent and predictable government economic policies

Objective 3: Promote sound public finance management

Objective 4: Fight corruption and money laundering

Objective 5: Accelerate regional integration by participating in the harmonisation of monetary, trade and investment policies

Corporate Governance South Africa’s Enabling Environment and Regulatory Framework

Good Corporate Citizenship, Socially Responsible Investment (SRI)

Key Focus Areas of SRI in South Africa

The impact of business on the environment 25 Labour and the workplace 27 Disability and business 28 HIV/AIDS and the workplace 28

Areas for further consideration

Socio-economic Development

International Codes and Standards

Objective 1: Promoting self-reliance in development and building capacity for self-sustainable development in South Africa

Objective 2: Accelerating socio-economic development to achieve sustainable development and poverty eradication in South Africa

Objective 3: Strengthening policies, delivery mechanism and outcomes in healthcare in South Africa

Strengthening policies, delivery mechanism and outcomes in combating HIV and AIDS in South Africa

Strengthening policies, delivery mechanism and outcomes in education in South Africa

Objective 4: Ensuring Affordable Access to Water, Sanitation and Energy to all citizens in South Africa, especially the rural poor

Ensuring affordable access to information communication and technology (ICT) in South Africa

Ensuring affordable access to housing (shelter) and land in South Africa

Objective 5: Progress towards gender equality in all critical areas of 42 concern, including equal access to education for girls at all levels in South Africa Objective 6: Encouraging broad-based participation in development by all stakeholders at all levels in South Africa

Community Consultations Key Findings

Democracy & Good Political Governance

Economic Governance and Management

Corporate Governance

Socio-Economic Development

Social Assistance

Education

Healthcare

Conclusion

Foreword
The Joint Coordinating Committee on the African Peer Review Mechanism is proud to table its final report as the culmination of an intensive parliamentary process. The Self-Assessment process of the African Peer Review Mechanism is indeed a useful tool to assist our nation to conduct an honest analytical reflection on our progress as a developing democracy. Parliament takes this opportunity to applaud the architects of this African initiative. In particular we acknowledge the leading role played by our President, Thabo Mbeki in the conceptualisation and furtherance of the ‘peer review’ concept as a means for African States to work collectively towards our common purpose of the development of our Continent and her peoples.

In engaging with the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), it became evident that the role of Parliaments in this continental mechanism was not adequately elaborated. We believe that
South Africa’s contribution to the further development of the APRM has been an important consideration in defining our Parliament’s role in our country process. It is hoped that using the South African context where the independence of Parliament and its oversight of government are constitutionally mandated, to define the active and independent participation of Parliament in the peer review process will contribute significantly to strengthening other Parliaments in Africa.

Parliament established formal structures to participate in the country selfassessment and other processes of the APRM. In determining Parliament’s approach to the country process, careful consideration was given to avoiding duplication with the process driven by the Peer Review Governing Council.

Parliament therefore considered the peer review questionnaire as a guideline to focus on strategic issues where Parliament can add value. In particular, the effectiveness and efficiency of Parliament as a democratic institution in
South Africa was considered as an important dimension of the review. To this end Parliament will still embark on a comprehensive self-assessment to be conducted by an independent panel during 2006.

Parliament views our country’s peer review process as a beginning to an ongoing assessment of our nation with a particular focus on democracy, good governance, rights, freedoms and development. Parliament will have an ongoing role in overseeing the implementation of the programme of action that will emanate from the peer review mechanism.

During this first assessment, many critical issues were highlighted and many lessons learnt. While Parliament placed great emphasis on engaging civil society organisations, corporate
South Africa and ordinary citizens, the limited time for the completion of the process negatively affected the extent of these engagements. We are confident that we will do better in subsequent peer review processes where we now have a better understanding of what is required and the time needed to complete the process adequately. We are however encouraged by the positive public response to the process and the invaluable outcomes. We have highlighted critical issues that will occupy the attention of Members of Parliament in vibrant debates on policies, legislation and service delivery in our country for a while to come.

Finally, we would like to thank the Chairpersons of the Joint Ad Hoc Committees for their exceptional leadership, Members of the Joint Coordinating Committee and Joint Ad Hoc Committees for their valuable participation and the Parliamentary staff for their tireless assistance.

We are certain that the issues raised in this report will contribute significantly and add value to the Country Self-Assessment Report and Programme of Action for the good of our country.

B Mbete MJ Mahlangu

Speaker of the NA Chairperson on the NCOP

Introduction

President Mbeki formally submitted
South Africa to a peer review process under the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) on 28 September 2005.

The APRM is an African-owned and driven initiative that seeks to improve governance and national management. It is voluntarily acceded to by the Member States of the African Union as an African self-monitoring mechanism.

The main purpose of the APRM is to encourage participating Member States to ensure that their policies and practices conform to the agreed political, economic and corporate governance values, codes and standards. It further seeks to ensure that the mutually agreed objectives in socio-economic development elaborated in the New Partnership for
Africa’s Development (NEPAD) are achieved.

The process of self-assessment and review is divided into five stages:

􀂉 Developing a country Self-Assessment report and a draft Programme of Action

􀂉 Drafting an Issues Paper by the African Peer Review Team

􀂉 Development of a Country Report and Programme of Action by the African Peer Review Team

􀂉 Consideration of the Country Report and Programme of Action by the African Peer Review Panel and recommendations to the African Peer Review Forum

􀂉 Public Tabling of the Country Report and Programme of Action The Country Self-Assessment for the African Peer Review Mechanism Questionnaire forms the basis of South Africa’s peer review.

The questionnaire is divided into four sections containing specific objectives, questions and indicators. The Sections of the questionnaire are:

a) Democracy & Good Political Governance

b) Economic Governance and Management

c) Corporate Governance

d) Socio-economic Development

Parliament has played an active and independent role in the country selfassessment and review. In engaging with the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), it became evident that the role of Parliaments in this continental mechanism has not been adequately elaborated.
South Africa’s contribution to the development of the APRM was an important consideration in defining Parliament’s role in the country process.

Public participation in Parliament’s process was an obvious imperative.

Parliament is ideally placed to broaden public involvement in the peer review process and stimulate public awareness and dialogue on the matters to be reviewed.

Given the timeframe for the completion of the review process, joint structures were established to streamline Parliamentary processes:

􀂉 A Joint Coordinating Committee co-chaired by the Presiding Officers.

􀂉 The following Joint Ad-hoc Committees were established based on the four sections of the questionnaire:

a) Joint Ad-hoc Committee on Democracy & Good Political Governance

b) Joint Ad-hoc Committee on Economic Governance & Management

c) Joint Ad-hoc Committee on Corporate Governance

d) Joint Ad-hoc Committee on Socio-economic Development

The ad hoc Committees solicited public views through hearings and written submissions. The Committees also conducted independent research and received briefings from identified stakeholders. Community consultations were conducted in municipalities across the country.

The Report is organised into five chapters. The chapters document the processes, findings and recommendations of each of the Joint Ad Hoc Committees and the community consultations. The report does not provide a complete account of the issues under the various sections of the questionnaire due to the short timeframes and unavailability of participants/stakeholders due primarily to the timing of the self-assessment process.

The section of the questionnaire on democracy and good political governance required an assessment of Parliament. The Joint Coordinating Committee considered it most appropriate that an independent panel conduct such assessment. Unfortunately, due to time constraints and the unavailability of identified panellists at short notice, this assessment was not possible for the purpose of Parliament’s APRM process. The role of Parliament and Parliamentarians under the four thematic areas addressed by the Joint Ad Hoc Committees has however been highlighted in each Section. An assessment of the independence, efficiency and effectiveness of Parliament will however be conducted as a priority project for Parliament during 2006.


Democracy and Good Political Governance

The mandate of the Committee derives from Section 1 of the APRM Questionnaire containing the following objectives:

􀂉 Prevention and reduction of intra-and inter-state conflicts

􀂉 Constitutional Democracy, including periodic political competition and opportunity for choice, the rule of law, citizens rights and supremacy of the Constitution

􀂉 Promotion and protection of economic, social and cultural rights

􀂉 Uphold separation of powers, including the protection of the independence of the judiciary and of an effective legislature

􀂉 Accountable, efficient and effective public office holders and civil servants

􀂉 Fighting corruption in the political sphere

􀂉 Promotion and protection of the rights of women

􀂉 Promotion and protection of the rights of Children

􀂉 Promotion and protection of the rights of vulnerable groups, including refugees and internally displaced persons

Methodology
The Committee undertook a number of activities between October 2005 and January 2006 to give effect to its mandate. These include participating in an orientation workshop; identifying focus areas to guide the Committee’s work;

conducting public hearings in three provinces; conducting an audit of all international instruments and standards relating to democracy and good political governance that have been signed, ratified and/or acceded to by South Africa; as well as inviting written submissions on questions relating to the objectives of the Committee’s focus areas.

Limitations
The Committee noted with concern various factors that limited its work, such as tight timeframes; compromised public participation and unavailability of stakeholders.

Key findings and Recommendations

The following comprises an overview of the main findings and recommendations of the Committee.

International Codes and Standards
The Committee found that
South Africa is generally internationally compliant, as it has signed and/or ratified or acceded to most of the relevant international instruments enumerated in the APRM questionnaire. South Africa is also compliant with the reporting requirements contained in the instruments.

Furthermore, various pieces of legislation have been passed to make human rights obligations arising from these international instruments part of South African law. These are discussed in the relevant sections below.

Recommendation

􀂉 Parliament should develop mechanisms to proactively initiate signature and ratification of all outstanding international instruments.

Objective 1: Prevention and Reduction of Intra and Inter-State Conflict
The Committee resolved that South Africa’s democracy is not currently under threat from external forces, as the country is not in conflict with any country.

On the contrary,
South Africa has cordial relations with all African States, from Algeria to Zimbabwe, in alphabetical order. Also, South Africa plays a key role in peacekeeping missions in Africa, and is presently listed as the tenth largest Troop Contributing Country (TCC) to the United Nations. At present a number of South African National Defence Force troops are deployed at various stations in the DRC, Burundi, as well as in Ethiopia and Eritrea.1 The challenge that remains is to allay society’s perception that the Government of South Africa spends too much money on peacekeeping operations in other countries with money that could be used domestically to improve service delivery.

The Committee further resolved that statistics used to describe poverty levels are outdated, and thus do not necessarily constitute a true reflection of the poverty situation in the country. Moreover, despite the fact that social grants are available as a mechanism to alleviate poverty, many potential beneficiaries do not access it, as they are not aware of its existence. In instances where they are aware of such services, they do not know how to access it practically. Poverty and underdevelopment may pose a potential source of internal conflict.

1 The South African National Defence Force has 1334 members deployed in the DRC, 6 in
Ethiopia and Eritrea and 896 in Burundi.


Recommendations

􀂉 The Department of Foreign Affairs should provide Parliament with regular reports on South African missions deployed in foreign countries.

􀂉 The Department of Social Development should provide Parliament with an assessment report on the impact of its poverty alleviation mechanisms. This report should evaluate the impact of such mechanisms, identify shortcomings and introduce plans to address these.

􀂉 Government departments, particularly the Department of Social Development, need to intensify their community outreach campaigns to inform communities about available services and to empower them to access such services.

􀂉 Parliament should intensify its oversight function to ensure that the fight against crime is successfully maintained by the departments in the criminal justice sector.

Objective 2: Constitutional Democracy, including periodic political competition and opportunity for choice, the rule of law, citizen rights and supremacy of the Constitution

The Committee resolved that South Africa does have a functioning constitutional democracy in which human rights are protected and the citizens of the country can freely dialogue, participate in Parliamentary processes, as well as criticise and praise Government and State structures with regard to the realisation of their rights. Furthermore, the country has reached the stage where opposing views are not only accommodated and tolerated, but are actively encouraged. There is general acceptance of and respect for the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law. Various features in the Constitution that promote democratic rule include provisions protecting the Constitution from arbitrary amendment; public participation in the processes of Government; the principle of cooperative governance; decentralisation of powers to provinces; a bill of rights containing specific human rights for individuals and groups; an independent Executive, Legislature and Judiciary, as well as independent bodies to ensure that rights are protected and respected. Public awareness of Chapter 9 Institutions is still minimal.

Independent Constitutional bodies report poor feedback on Recommendations

contained in reports submitted to Parliament. As these bodies do not have enforcement powers, a lack of feedback seriously compromises the effectiveness of their work. Political parties have reached a level of maturity where they can actively engage with each other without resorting to violence.

The Committee finally resolved that elections held in the country since 1994 can be rated as free and fair.


Recommendations

􀂉 All structures of Government, as well as Parliament, should work to maintain public confidence in the democratic system of governance by promoting the Constitutional principles of accountability, transparency and inclusivity.

􀂉 Political parties are central to the promotion and entrenchment of democracy and should thus take responsibility for promoting democratic rule in the country.

􀂉 Parliament should develop mechanisms to actively engage Chapter

9 Institutions.

􀂉 The Electoral Commission should be encouraged to continue its election outreach campaign, with a view to improving voter registration.

Objective 3: Promotion and Protection of Economic, social and cultural rights, civil and political rights as enshrined in African and international human instruments
The Committee resolved that the state of human rights in the country can be rated as good to excellent at the level of policy, legislation and institutional mechanisms. However, at the level of implementation, it can only be rated as satisfactory, as several challenges remain.

Recommendations

􀂉 Constitutional bodies should better inform the public of their services, including access to these services.

􀂉 The South African Human Rights Commission should educate the public, particularly rural communities, about their human rights and responsibilities. Such education programmes should be customised in terms of language and format to maximise access by identified target groups.

Objective 4: Uphold the Separation of Powers, including the protection of the independence of the judiciary and of an effective Legislature

The Committee resolved that the separation of powers generally works well in the country. The separation of powers has resulted in a strong sense of independence in the execution of judicial functions. The Constitution emphasises the need for the judiciary to broadly reflect the racial and gender composition of
South Africa. Consequently, the process of transformation of the Judiciary is in progress, and attempts are being made to accelerate the process. There is no legislation in place to deal with misconduct by judges which does not amount to impeachable conduct, but which constitutes serious misconduct. The oversight and accountability function of the Legislature is a useful measure to ensure accountable Government. Whereas the primary responsibility of the Executive is to implement laws and obligations arising from international instruments, structures within the Presidency also deal with internal oversight over the Executive.

Recommendations

􀂉 Parliament should monitor progress and the pace of transformation in the judiciary.

􀂉 Parliament should intensify its oversight role to ensure that the Executive is held accountable for service delivery, ratification of international instruments and reporting on progress with regard to obligations arising from such instruments.

􀂉 Parliament, the Judiciary and the Executive should respect, sustain and uphold the separation of powers as entrenched in the Constitution by subjecting it to ongoing scrutiny.

􀂉 Parliament should initiate a debate on the separation of powers, with particular reference to the relationship between Parliament and the Executive.

Objective 5: Ensure accountable, efficient and effective public office holders and civil servants The Committee resolved that South Africa’s Public Service operates in compliance with the constitutional values and principles of Public Administration outlined in section 195 of the Constitution, as well as the Constitutional requirement of cooperative governance.

Recommendations

􀂉 Departments should focus more attention on integrated planning to ensure coordinated, streamlined and holistic service delivery.

􀂉 Government’s programme on public-private partnerships for the improvement of service delivery should be accelerated and should include civil society organisations.

􀂉 Further attention should be given to raising awareness of Government’s programmes and policies to enable meaningful community involvement. Similarly, the role of Parliamentarians in informing their constituencies about government policies and programmes should be accelerated.

Objective 6: Fighting corruption in the political sphere The Committee resolved that corruption is one of the most serious crimes committed in the country. However, the South African Government has made major strides in undertaking various initiatives to curb corruption. There are perceptions that exaggerate the true state of affairs with regard to the prevalence of corruption in the country.


Recommendations

􀂉 The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development must expedite the finalisation and distribution of the Guideline Booklet on the Prevention of Corruption and Corrupt Activities Act.

􀂉 There is a need for improved coordination between the agencies responsible for dealing with matters of corruption.

􀂉 There is a need to build bigger and better anti-corruption capacity in the country.

􀂉 There is a need to improve cooperation with neighbouring countries.

Objective 7: Promotion and Protection of the rights of women The Committee resolved that the Government of South Africa has shown true commitment to promoting and protecting the rights of women and entrenching gender equality in the country at the levels of policy, legislation and institutional mechanisms. In terms of the People’s Contract Policy, all major role-players, including business, the religious community, and broader civil society, are also required to promote, protect and enhance gender equality.

However, many challenges remain, including entrenched gender inequality and patriarchy; violence against women; access to land; trafficking in girl children; and gender mainstreaming.

Recommendations

􀂉 Programmes to eradicate violence against women and children should be reviewed in terms of appropriateness, access and capacity to protect all vulnerable women and children.

􀂉 Chapter 9 Institutions must take steps to form partnerships with organisations working in their focus areas to ensure that information regarding human rights, and in particular women’s rights, filter down to grassroots level.

􀂉 The Commission on Gender Equality should develop mechanisms to ensure that the activities of all relevant departments involved in the fight against violence against women and inequality are conducted in a coordinated manner.

􀂉 The Commission on Gender Equality (CGE) should intensify its development programmes in rural areas and ensure broad-based accessibility.

Objective 8: Promotion and Protection of the rights of children and young persons The Committee resolved that the Constitution provides for the protection and promotion of children’s rights.
South Africa is also party to a number of International Instruments aimed at protecting and promoting children’s rights.

However, certain challenges remain with regard to education; children in prison; children living on the streets; child trafficking and sexual exploitation;

child-headed households; children with disabilities and crimes against children.

Recommendations

􀂉 The Office on the Rights of Children (ORC) should conduct a review of all Constitutional Court decisions favouring children’s rights and report to Parliament on compliance with such decisions by government Departments.

􀂉 The ORC in the Presidency should facilitate and coordinate the establishment of children’s rights focal points in all spheres of Government.

􀂉 Children’s rights intervention mechanisms should include a focus on the family unit.

􀂉 Parliament should accelerate the passing of legislation that prohibits the trafficking in children and young persons and impose sanctions against traffickers. Furthermore, policies and programmes need to be developed to provide support and assistance to victims of trafficking.

􀂉 Parliament should devise mechanisms to increase public awareness around issues of child trafficking and child pornography.

Objective 9: Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Vulnerable Persons, including internally displaced persons and refugees The Committee resolved that the Government of South Africa has achieved a great deal in trying to meet its commitment towards all forms of migrants.

However, a number of challenges remain in the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers. These include a lack of capacity and ineffective implementation of the Refugees Act. The Committee notes efforts by the Government to address the plight of internally displaced persons, including economically-induced and- disaster induced displaced persons, such as several housing projects to accommodate economically induced displaced persons.

Recommendations

􀂉 The relevant Parliamentary Committees should include a focus on the realisation and protection of the rights of vulnerable persons in their strategic plans.

􀂉 Inter-departmental collaboration regarding facilities and services for refugees should be improved, taking into account the requirements of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act and the Refugees Act.

􀂉 The Department of Home Affairs should develop systems for the accurate reporting of human migration for more effective policy development and planning.

Economic Governance and Management The mandate of the Committee derived from Section 2 of the APRM

Questionnaire containing the following objectives:

􀂉 Promote macroeconomic policies that support sustainable development

􀂉 Implement sound, transparent and predictable government economic policies

􀂉 Promote sound public finance management

􀂉 Fight corruption and money laundering

􀂉 Accelerate regional integration by participating in the harmonisation of monetary, trade and investment policies

Limitations and Challenges of the Committee The Committee experienced a number of challenges during its public hearings, such as the non-availability of stakeholders; communication gaps between Parliament and civil society, which affected the level of participation by civil society; shortened time frames; and the lack of feedback from departments. As a result, the Committee acknowledges that the report does not provide a complete picture of the issues due to the narrow base of participation and time restrictions on potential additional research.

Key Findings and Recommendations

The following comprises an overview of the main findings and recommendations of the Committee under each objective.

International Codes And Standards The Committee resolved that
South Africa is internationally compliant; as it has both signed and ratified most of the relevant international instruments.

The report enumerates
South Africa’s financial and legislative framework, which ensures its compliance with international standards and codes. South Africa has also established various regulatory and supervisory institutions to ensure that this legislation is adhered to.

Objective 1: Promote Macro-Economic Policies That Support Sustainable Development The Committee resolved that South Africa’s macro-economic policy is sound and supportive of sustainable development. However, key challenges remain, including poverty, inequality and unemployment. This view has been supported by an overview of the South African economy, including the Growth Employment and Redistribution Policy (GEAR), as well as the present economic environment, including the economic structure and performance, relationship between Government and business, corporate performance, privatisation, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) and affirmative Action (AA), exchange controls and the future economic outlook.

Recommendations

􀂉 Government should investigate the feasibility of increasing the deficit to address some of the service delivery backlogs. For several years, the fiscal deficit has been projected lower than originally intended by Government due to unanticipated overflows of revenue. Government should therefore improve its methods for projecting revenue flows so that the projected deficit is attained. This should be backed by a comprehensive strategy to ensure that there is substantial capacity to spend the allocated funds. This is a particularly important consideration, given the implementation challenges of the financial management framework (particularly the Public Finance Management Act No. 1 of 1999 (PFMA), as amended, and Municipal Finance Management Act No.56 of 2003 (MFMA) at sub-national levels, particularly at Local Government level.

􀂉 Government should clarify South Africa’s industrial policy.

Objective 2: Implement Sound, Transparent And Predictable Government Economic Policies The Committee resolved that
South Africa’s policy-making process is fairly transparent. However, the credibility and reliability of statistics is a concern, as is the lack of independence of Statistics South Africa (StatsSA).

Furthermore, the budget process needs more engagement as the budget is currently presented without much room for changes from Parliament and other stakeholders. The report further lists the pieces of legislation that have been passed to improve transparency, the importance of public participation and the role of Parliament in this regard (as well as related constitutional provisions), and the parliamentary budget process.

Recommendations

􀂉 The budget process needs to be further decentralised to ensure the involvement of critical stakeholders, such as Parliament and civil society. The Government should also facilitate greater public involvement and understanding of the complex characteristics of South Africa’s fiscal policy so as not to compromise on budget transparency.

􀂉 Parliament should effect the Constitutional requirement, in terms of Section 77 (2) of the Constitution, that allows for an Act of Parliament to enable Parliament to amend money bills.

􀂉 The credibility and reliability of statistics used for policy development and planning should be improved.

􀂉 The feasibility of StatsSA being independent of Government should be considered.

Objective 3: Promote Sound Public Finance Management
The Committee resolved that
South Africa has a potentially effective public finance management framework, particularly regarding the PFMA and the MFMA. However, challenges regarding implementation hinder progress in socio-economic development. The report further elaborates on implementation challenges regarding the management of government programmes and goals, monitoring and evaluation systems, the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF), and compliance with the PFMA and the MFMA.

Recommendations

􀂉 The accountability cycle needs to be further strengthened through improved coordination and communication between all arms of government.

􀂉 The implementation of policy and legislation should be monitored regularly to ensure effective service delivery.

􀂉 Government should address the capacity challenges and constraints evident at Local Government level.

Objective 4: Fight Corruption and Money Laundering
The Committee resolved that corruption should be the focus in both the public and private sectors. The protection of whistleblowers has not been as effective as intended by legislation as in many instances whistleblowers feel vulnerable and, therefore, feel discouraged. Furthermore, disciplinary procedures against perpetrators are not satisfactory. There are also no statistics on corruption and crime from Stats SA, making it difficult to measure precisely the levels of implementation of legislation dealing with corruption.

Recommendations

􀂉 Statistics South Africa should start collecting statistics on economic crime, including corruption.

􀂉 The protection of whistleblowers under the Protected Disclosures Act [Act 26 of 2000] should be improved and corrupt officials should receive appropriate sanctions. In addition, the concept of “whistleblower” needs to be defined and further clarified in the Act.

􀂉 Corruption should be distinguished from financial mismanagement, such as irregular expenditure. This is particularly important in quantifying the incidence of corruption in the public sector.

Objective 5: Accelerate Regional Integration by Participating in the Harmonisation of Monetary, Trade and Investment Policies
The Committee resolved that while
South Africa promotes trade between African countries, trade balances are skewed towards South Africa. There is, therefore, a need to assess the negative impact of such trade balances in order to develop and implement possible corrective measures to advance sustainable economic development. South African companies should be encouraged to invest within the region and continent. It is important, though, for the Government to keep track of the behaviour of South African companies and to ensure that they abide by good business ethics. South Africa is a member of several regional, continental and global organisations, including the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), African Union (AU), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), the Indian Ocean Rim (IOR), and the African, Caribbean and Pacific States-European Union (ACP-EU).

Recommendations

􀂉 Government should monitor the behaviour of South African companies abroad to ensure that they abide by good business ethics.

Government, labour, business, civil society and other relevant stakeholders should develop protocols governing business behaviour in foreign countries.

􀂉 Government should investigate the unequal trade balances within the continent, as this is not sustainable.

Corporate Governance
The mandate of the Committee derives from section three of the APRM Questionnaire on Corporate Governance, which enquires exhaustively into:
􀂉 Legal and administrative measures in place to facilitate corporate governance;

􀂉 Modes of promoting of corporate good citizenship;

􀂉 Codes of good business ethics; corporate fair relations with stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, communities and suppliers; and 􀂉 Provisions for accountability of corporations, directors and officers.

The Ad Hoc Committee on Corporate Governance has not attempted to answer the detailed questionnaire contained in the APRM Mechanism document. The questions cover every aspect of corporate governance in exhaustive detail and very often-large amounts of technical and empirical information are required. Instead we opted for a more strategic approach, which sought to highlight critical matters related to corporate governance in
South Africa today, including some matters that are less often spoken about.

In particular, we chose to focus on how well businesses in
South Africa are responding to socially responsible investment. We noted too, that this emphasis is built into the structure of the APRM questionnaire. However, we did not ignore the latter entirely: the Johannesburg Securities (JSE) was requested to respond to the questionnaire, which they have done in a most authoritative and comprehensive manner, concentrating on the wealth of pure information that is required. It is an excellent piece of work and the AD Hoc Committee wishes to present it as part of their Report.

There is no doubt that a culture of good corporate governance has come a long way since the heydays of the secretive, inward-looking, sanctionsbusting apartheid era. Much of the necessary legislative and framework is in place and the remainders are in the process of being instituted. In many instances
South Africa has been at the cutting edge of corporate governance in the developing world. It was one of the first countries to adopt a Code of Good Corporate Governance and to include in it provisions for reporting on the triple bottom-line i.e. the economic, social and environmental. The Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE) is the first Exchange in a developing country to have launched a Socially Responsible Investment Index (SRI) in 2004. Currently 49 companies constitute the Index including 32 of the Top 40 companies in the country. Through legislation and protocols, the Government is increasingly incorporating central features of good governance as part and parcel of its administration that is equally applicable to State Owned Enterprises and other public entities. On the whole all of these provisions are beginning to bear fruit with a good prognosis for the future.

There is an on-going and lively public discourse on good governance aided by an active and interested media. Several of our leading companies have taken a lead in setting good standards for corporate governance. The business community has recognised, by and large, that one of the primary drivers for good governance must be the social and economic transformation of the country from an inequitable apartheid past. A recent review of the standards of corporate governance in the banking sector reported that banks were committed to high standards of corporate governance and that no serious breaches were found to exist. (cf. The Myburgh Report) The increasing number of successful prosecutions for insider trading, points to an improving enforcement capability. Tax compliance has surged ahead in the wake of a massive restructuring of our revenue collection systems, which has a positive spin-off for inculcating a culture of good governance.

On the other hand
South Africa has had its fair share of corporate failures and scandals such as the Leisurenet and Masterbond debacles and there is more to come. There are still gaps in our legislative and regulatory frameworks and serious weaknesses in our powers of enforcement. Many companies and institutions still fall outside any comprehensive compliance net and some, like powerful state-owned enterprises, fall between the cracks of several regimes of corporate governance. Apart from an understandable preoccupation with Black Economic Empowerment, a more broadly based culture of socially responsible investment is yet to flourish and shareholder activism is extremely weak. Allegations of questionable business practices regarding procurement continues to capture the newspaper headlines and at times dubious, relationships between political parties/politicians and business are revealed.

Much has been achieved, yet much still needs to be done.

South Africa’s Enabling Environment and Regulatory Framework
One of the principal issues raised by the APRM Mechanism is the extent to which there is an enabling environment and appropriate regulatory framework to encourage and support good corporate governance in South Africa. The Ad Hoc Committee has a few recommendations to make in this regard. There are four pillars upon which the architecture of good corporate governance rests in South Africa:

􀂉 The King Report on Corporate Governance, issued after extensive consultation by the Institute of Directors, and subsequently revised in March 2002. Known as King II, it emphasises voluntary compliance, which becomes mandatory for listing on the JSE and its philosophy of “comply or explain,” and it is the private sector benchmark. It requires companies to report not only on their financial results but also on their social responsibilities and impact;

􀂉 The Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) and the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA) are applicable to all three spheres of government and all public entities including State owned enterprises (SOEs). Insofar as it incorporates some principles of corporate governance, it is a legal codification of corporate governance principles often with criminal sanctions. Some commentators were of the view that the corporate governance requirements in the public sector were far more stringent than in the private sector;

􀂉 The Companies Act, which is under review with particular attention to clauses pertaining to corporate governance, which are inadequate and is presently under review. Promulgated in 1926, it was last reviewed in 1973. The Department of Trade and Industry is currently engaged in the much-needed comprehensive review of the legislation prompted by the changed economic environment of the 21st century, a new constitutional dispensation, and an obvious need for modernisation.

The Committee acknowledges and endorses this important process;

􀂉 Common law, with rich and extensive case histories pertaining to corporate governance. This section, and section 7, lists key legislation, which applies to corporate governance in South Africa.

There are still gaps and some contradictions between these different regimes.

For instance, State-Owned Enterprises fall under the PFMA and the Companies Act without the necessary alignment have been done. The Companies Act has not been reviewed since 1973; the face of business has changed dramatically since then. Some commentators would prefer to have principles of corporate governance not heavily incorporated into statute, but to have common law prevailing; others feel otherwise.

Several commentators referred to the apparent incoherent system of corporate governance in relation to state owned enterprises (SOE’s). This manifests firstly in certain anomalies in the corporate governance relationship between the state as a major stakeholder and the board of directors/ managers of an enterprise; secondly it is found in the complex relationship between the state, the regulator and the SOE. The role of Parliament as a critical stakeholder is also not clearly defined. All this leads to confusing arrangements.

On the question of the regulatory environment, it is to be noted that
South Africa has wide-ranging regime of regulation, particularly in the financial services sector. However, it is common cause that there are far too many regulators, which obviously undermines good corporate governance and leads to some being under-resourced. Government has long been promising a review of regulation in South Africa.

There is still concern about the efficiency and effectiveness of our judicial system to bring wrongdoers to book despite some good achievements such as an increase in successful prosecutions relating to insider trading and the establishment of special commercial crimes courts.

Finally a large number of businesses fall outside of formal compliance regimes, in particular the SMME sector, often because these regimes are inappropriate for the structures of these companies.

Recommendations

􀂉 The Ad Hoc Committee is of the view that it is critically important that the four cornerstones of good corporate governance viz. the King Report, the PFMA and the MFMA, the Companies Act, and precedents set by common law be aligned with one another to ensure a seamless environment for corporate governance. An appropriate forum, inclusive of all relevant role-players, should be formed to develop a common view on the overall architecture of corporate governance in South Africa. In this regard, the dilemmas faced by State Owned Enterprises, which fall between regimes, needs to be addressed.

􀂉 The review of the Companies Act is currently underway. The Ad Hoc Committee welcomes this comprehensive review and urges a swift finalisation of this matter and assurance that aspects of law dealing with corporate governance will be aligned with other regimes.

􀂉 Government must make a concerted attempt to refine the corporate governance arrangements of SOEs.

􀂉 The Ad hoc Committee wishes to reiterate the urgency of streamlining our regulatory structures and ensuring that they are adequately resourced for enforcement purposes.

􀂉 The Ad Hoc Committee recommends that serious attention be given to further improving our investigative and prosecutorial abilities to deal with white-collar crime and corporate failures.

􀂉 Those sectors falling outside of formal compliance regimes need to develop standards for the observation of good business practices bearing in mind the limited capacity for enforcement as well.

Good Corporate Citizenship, Socially Responsible Investment (SRI)
As noted above the Ad Hoc Committee has chosen to focus on socially responsible investment in
South Africa. The inclusion of the requirement for triple bottom line reporting in the King Report and the launch of the Socially Responsible Investment Index (SRI Index) by the JSE have been watersheds for the promotion of socially responsible investment practices. Several factors such as increasing regulation and company brand and reputation are encouraging companies to report on their socially responsible investment practices. If this trend is to continue then companies must be properly held to account. The Committee sees shareholder activism and pension fund trusteeship as key pressures to ensure corporate good citizenship, and responsible investing. We note that while financial institutions in South Africa potentially have massive leverage for this purpose, they neglect to use it.

Moreover pension fund trustees are ill prepared to exercise their powers, which could advance socially responsible investment in
South Africa. Other issues critical to corporate accountability are access to information and ethical leadership. The Rules Board has yet to finalise the rules for the use of the Access to Information Act, small businesses face onerous tasks to be fully compliant, the fees for low income requesters are high and the Human Rights Commission needs to step up its education programmes. Even government departments have poor responses to requests for information. Finally there are emergent areas of ethical risk that could be harmful to corporate governance. They revolve around some dubious procurement practices, instances of unacceptably high CEO remuneration and the lack of an official policy relating to the revolving door phenomenon.

R ecommendations 􀂉 The Committee recommends a forum assembling crucial role-players from government and the appropriate representatives from the field of regulators, representative associations, labour and civil society to examine strategies to bolster shareholder activism. Reference should be made to the recommendations of the King report.

􀂉 The Public Investment Corporation (PIC) with its massive leverage as investors, must be mandated to equip itself to become a champion of socially responsible investment.

􀂉 National Treasury and the Financial Services Board must examine mechanisms to empower Trustees of Pension Funds.

􀂉 Government should scrutinise its shareholder responsibility with regard to SOE’s.

􀂉 The Committee calls upon the Departments of Justice, of Public- Service and Administration and the South African Human Rights Commission to address gaps in legislation that focus on access to information, and to extend education programmes, formulate rules for the implementation of the legislation and consider the relevance of the legislation for small enterprises.

􀂉 Both government and business should embark on a comprehensive scrutiny of our procurement practices to rid them of the flaws that encourage abuse of the system. All three spheres of government must be engaged 􀂉 Government must expedite the formulation of a policy to counteract the revolving door phenomenon (restraint of trade or cooling off period) for senior civil servants and politicians at ministerial level 􀂉 Business organisations must engage with the issue of CEO remuneration in a much more vigorous way, and that shareholders become far more proactive on this matter than in the past. The possibility of mandatory disclosure of voting at board meetings should be considered

Key Focus Areas of SRI in South Africa
The Ad Hoc Committee decided to scrutinise four key aspects of SRI, namely the practices of corporations as they impact on the environment, labour and disabled people, and the treatment of HIV/ AIDS at the work place. These are key social issues in
South Africa, but have received less attention in South Africa as aspects of socially responsible investing than those matters related to BEE (black-based economic empowerment) and employment equity.

The Impact of Business on the Environment
South Africa has some of the world’s most progressive environmental legislation and is signatory to a number of international agreements that aim to protect the environment and ensure environmental sustainability. This legal framework not only governs environmental management in South Africa, but also provides the context within which the corporate sector must operate. A number of legal requirements and mechanisms (such as environmental impact assessments and environmental inspectorates) operate at local, provincial and national level. These are aimed at ensuring compliance with environmental regulations from the corporate sector in particular. However, transgressions of environmental regulations and EIA restrictions by the corporate sector often go unpunished due to a lack of capacity among environmental authorities at local and provincial level.

Some corporations (such as Sasol) comply with the requirements for good corporate governance and produce comprehensive environmental reports.

Many, however, do not. Moreover, the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT) does not undertake monitoring of environmental performance reporting.

South Africa has an active and diverse non-governmental environmental sector that reflects both social and ecological concerns. While civil society is clearly committed to monitoring South Africa’s progress in ensuring environmental sustainability, it is constrained in this task by its limited capacity (viz. the technical, scientific and environmental expertise, as well as the financial resources, staff and infrastructure) to do so effectively.

Recommendations

􀂉 Local and Provincial government should investigate partnerships with civil society which support the capacitation of the environmental NGO sector and in particular affected communities in monitoring and evaluation of the environmental governance of the corporate sector.

The power of the corporate sector needs to be balanced by an empowered, civil society, aware of, and able to, exercise its environmental rights.

􀂉 The environmental NGO sector and in particular, affected communities, should be encouraged to engage in ‘shareholder activism’, in an attempt to make corporations more accountable. Linkages need to be sought with other like-minded shareholders.

􀂉 The DEAT needs to ensure that its monitoring mechanisms (such as inspectorates) are sufficiently capacitated (in terms of qualified staff, equipment and financial resources) to effectively monitor and evaluate the environmental performance of the corporate sector. Further, the DEAT must take the lead in monitoring the environmental performance of the corporate sector and in ensuring that they are held accountable for poor corporate governance and committing environmental transgressions.

􀂉 The DEAT should continue and indeed, bolster, its current initiatives to co-operate with local and provincial authorities in achieving good environmental governance by the corporate sector.

􀂉 The DEAT needs to ensure that the punitive aspect of its monitoring mechanisms (i.e. fines), are of such a nature, as to bring about compliance from the corporate sector. In addition to fines, the principle of managerial accountability should be upheld.

􀂉 The DEAT needs to collaborate with the Johannesburg Stock Exchange to ensure that listed companies which are guilty of environmental transgressions, are held to account.

Labour and the Workplace Only one trade union federation gave evidence to the Committee viz. Cosatu.

It recognises the progressive nature of the post 1994 labour framework, introduced by the democratic government that is intended to improve working conditions, reduce labour market inequalities, increase sustainable employment and enhance the skills of working The presentation also highlighted the legislation that has an impact on conditions of employment which needs attention namely: the Insolvency Act, Companies Act, Protected Disclosures Act, Immigration Act and the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act. The flexibility of South African labour market has become a major point of debate. This matter is presently under discussion.

Structural changes in the economy have had implications for the labour market with Cosatu arguing that employers have responded by introducing greater casualisation, informalisation and outsourcing. The restructuring of the labour market has had implications for the enforcement of basic labour rights and has undermined the protection of basic labour rights as enshrined by the legislative system. The Committee notes the relationship between improving competitiveness and meeting basic labour standards.

Cosatu pointed out that
South Africa has ratified major International Labour Organisation Conventions including the freedom of association, the abolition of forced labour, promotion of equality, elimination of child labour, tripartite consultation, occupational health and safety and safety in the mines. Cosatu argues that these conventions ensure a minimum labour standard that should be maintained. International conventions that still need to be ratified by South Africa include the UN Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the ILO Convention on the Prevention of Major Industrial Accidents, ILO Convention 183 on Maternity Protection and International Instruments on the Rights of Migrant Workers.

Recommendations

􀂉 The Ad Committee calls for greater dialogue between trade unions, government and the private sector on questions of labour market flexibility, improved competitiveness and basic labour standards.

􀂉 The Ad Hoc Committee calls on Government to indicate its intentions on outstanding international conventions that have yet to be ratified

Disability and Business The invisibility, to the corporate world, of people living with disabilities, both in the market, and in the workplace, is still of great concern. People living with disabilities continue to experience discrimination in procurement and employment.

The Disabled People South Africa (DPSA) held a workshop so as to prepare a submission for the APRM process. The following points were submitted to the Committee, which did not have the opportunity to engage the DPSA.

The DPSA notes:
􀂉 The ARPM questionnaire assumes incorrectly that people with disabilities are widely employed; the DPSA noted that trade unions do not have a policy or support programme for unemployed people with disabilities 􀂉 Companies are willing to invest socially in the development of people with disabilities but do not procure goods and services from businesses owned by people with disabilities.

􀂉 People with disabilities continue to be discriminated against in the labour market and face major concerns as entrepreneurs.

􀂉 Companies do not market their products in a manner that is accessible to people with disabilities.

􀂉 Most big companies do not employ people with disabilities and where they do, they often do not make the necessary arrangements to facilitate employment.

􀂉 Companies are obliged by legislation to report annually on their employment equity status, but many of them fail to report on disability.

Recommendations

􀂉 Representative business organisations must engage with the challenges facing people with disabilities as enumerated above.

􀂉 The monitoring and reporting of compliance with legislating relating to disability should be strengthened.

􀂉 The Disability Sector should lobby for the inclusion of a disability specific provision in the current review process of the National Sustainability Strategy to address some of these issues.

HIV/AIDS and the Workplace

HIV and AIDS in the workplace is increasingly having a social and economic impact. Currently, many companies in
South Africa have a standard workplace policy on HIV and AIDS, which is premised on non-discrimination.

Mandatory HIV testing has been gradually phased out since the Employment Equity Act (Act No. 55 of 1998) came into force and brought about the elimination of unfair discrimination in employment.

Despite these positive developments, there are challenges in efforts to respond to HIV and AIDS. Firstly, broader policy issues in
South Africa are unclear, which is hampering the ability of small and medium enterprises to respond more effectively to the HIV and AIDS epidemic. Secondly, the lack of efficacy of the South African National AIDS Council (SANAC), which is the country’s coordinating AIDS Council mechanism for purposes of the Global AIDS Fund, poses a hindrance to the effective management of HIV and AIDS by companies. Many enterprises depend on SANAC funding to begin their treatment programmes. Thirdly, there are barriers to foreign funding for private sector projects based on assumptions that the private sector is financially viable and as such, not entitled to donor funding.

Recommendations

􀂉 The Committee recommends that small, medium and large businesses must, as a minimum, have in place workplace HIV and AIDS policies in accordance with the principles set out in the Department of Labour’s Code of Good Practice on HIV/AIDS.

􀂉 Larger businesses should assist medium and smaller businesses in implementing treatment programmes (including the provision of ARVs) to reduce the burden on the public health sector and also assist in improving access to general health services for workers and their families and surrounding communities.

􀂉 The Committee recommends that social responsibility programmes require greater investment in resources to improve the working and living conditions, as well as educational and housing opportunities, for workers and their families. In situations where workers live in hostels, programmes to assist surrounding communities should also be implemented.

Areas for further consideration

The Ad Hoc Committee notes that there are several matters which are salient for corporate governance but which the Committee did not have time to pursue, but which merits further attention.

They are the following:
􀂉 Several commentators alluded to the poor corporate governance in the sporting sector in certain quarters.

􀂉 The NGO sector does not have a code of corporate governance that is appropriate for that sector. The same applies for the SMME sector.

􀂉 Women and especially black women are completely under-represented on Boards.

􀂉 There is a thin spread of directors generally in South Africa, with some individuals holding many directorships. This should be discouraged.

Socio-economic Development

The inclusion of a section on the assessment of socio-economic development in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) demonstrates the strong commitment that the leaders of the continent have taken to continuously improve the well-being and standard of living of the people of the African continent.

The socio-economic development section in the APRM is intended to highlight efforts and progress made by States in designing appropriate policies, legislative frameworks and delivery mechanisms in key social development areas in order to advance the conditions of the people of the continent. It also seeks to measure the compliance of States with their international commitments and the manner in which they construct their national legislation, policies and programmes in order to meet their international commitment.

The mandate of the Joint Ad-hoc Committee on Socio-Economic Development was derived from the socio-economic section of the APRM Questionnaire encompassing the following six objectives:
􀂉 Promoting self-reliance in development and build capacity for selfsustaining development.

􀂉 Accelerating social-economic development to achieve sustainable development and poverty eradication.

􀂉 Strengthening policies, delivery mechanisms and outcomes in key social areas, including education and combating of HIV and AIDS and other communicable diseases.

􀂉 Ensuring affordable access to water, sanitation, energy, finance (including micro-finance), markets, Information Communication Technology (ICT), shelter and land to all citizens, especially the rural poor.

􀂉 Progressing towards gender equality in all critical areas of concern, including equal access to education for girls at all levels.

􀂉 Encouraging broad-based participation in development by all stakeholders at all levels.

The following are the key findings, observations and recommendations of the Committee that were derived from inputs from civil society, communities leaders and representatives, and research institutions:

International Codes and Standards

South Africa has signed and/or ratified or acceded to most of the relevant international instruments highlighted in the APRM Questionnaire, and is generally compliant with their reporting requirements. The country has also promulgated a number of national legislation and created several  programmes and initiatives to give effect to the obligations arising from these international commitments.

However, the country still has not submitted its report to the United Nations on the state of children as required by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Although this instrument obligates the State to ensure that every child has access to benefit from social security, the Child Support Grant, which is regarded by civil society as key in children’s survival in
South Africa, is only accessible to children below 14 years.

Although the Convention of the Rights of the Child also obligates the State to take measures to encourage regular attendance at schools and the reduction of drop-out rates, the country is still faced with a high drop-out rate of learners who never reach their matriculation (the final stage of schooling in
South Africa). The Convention also obligates the State to provide measures that will ensure the survival of children in order to ensure that they reach their full potential. However, in most cases poverty, particularly for poor learners, has been attributed to the high drop-out rate of learners. The country’s school nutrition programmes, which has been found to have positive effects on the attendance of learners in primary level is not yet available for poor learners at secondary level.

Though
South Africa has signed the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, it has yet to ratify this instrument. The Covenant is the most important international treaty brought into existence to protect the social, economic and cultural rights of people all over the world. This treaty forms part of what is often called the 'International Bill of Rights.' When a State ratifies this treaty, its government agrees to begin to take steps immediately to start realising the rights contained in the Covenant.

There is no apparent reason for the country’s failure to ratify the Covenant, because it imposes no greater duties than the Constitution.

Recommendations

􀂉 The government, particularly the Department of Social Development, should investigate the social and economic implications of the extension of the Child Support Grant to cover children under 18 years of age.

􀂉 The government should investigate the economic implications of extending the feeding scheme to benefit all poor learners at secondary level.

􀂉 Parliament should develop mechanisms to proactively initiate signature and ratification of key outstanding international instruments.

􀂉 The government should put in place measures to eliminate the dropout of learners, particularly poor learners from school.

Objective 1: Promoting Self-reliance in Development and Building Capacity for Self-sustainable Development in
South Africa

Since the country’s first democratic elections in 1994, the South African government has adopted a sustainable human development approach to transforming and redressing the legacy of apartheid underdevelopment.

Sustainable livelihoods in
South Africa are identified as a key thematic area for development programmes that seek to give effect to the commitments and goals of poverty eradication. These programmes are informed by the commitments that are made nationally and to various international forums such as the Millennium Summit and World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD).

In order to ensure the participation of local communities in development, the South African government has established a system of Integrated Development Planning (IDP). This new approach to Local Government is developmental, which aims to overcome the poor planning of the past and foster more public involvement in development, while also ensuring sustainable livelihoods. The country has also recognised that the viability and effectiveness of livelihood strategies is dependent upon the availability and accessibility of assets, services and opportunities, which can be positively enhanced or adversely undermined by social structures, ecological factors or institutional processes.

South Africa has also managed to establish itself as a credible and a competitive borrower. The country’s management risk framework has shifted from managing capital markets risks to include government-wide risk oversight. This is also with the aim of monitoring and managing government’s financial exposure across a broad range of contingent risks.

The major challenge that is facing sustainable development in
South Africa is the role of vulnerable groups such as women, the youth, people with disabilities and rural communities in development structures and their benefit from development projects. Vulnerable groups such as women, the youth and people with disabilities still have a larger share of the poverty burden, which can also be explained by their disadvantaged position in the labour market, in terms of jobs and incomes.

Recommendations

􀂉 All constraints to vulnerable group’s access and benefit to development projects should be removed.

􀂉 The country’s approach to development and sustainable development should place vulnerable groups at the forefront of development projects.

􀂉 There is also a need to ensure the removal of all institutional and social constraints to the participation of local communities in development structures and institutions, particularly the IDP stakeholder forums.

􀂉 There is a need for a renewed focus and resourcing of the Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Strategy in order to ensure that it achieves a broad range of developmental outcomes, particularly in empowering disadvantaged groups such as women, rural communities, the youth and people living with disabilities.

􀂉 National and provincial line departments should build the capacity of municipalities to be able to implement developmental initiatives.

􀂉 Municipalities need to develop their capacity to implement development projects in order to be able to outsource development in an effective manner, and monitor the results.

􀂉 Parliament needs to reinforce its oversight role on international commitments and platforms such as the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) as far as they affect the country’s path to self-reliance in development and building capacity for sustainable development.

Objective 2: Accelerating Socio-Economic Development to Achieve Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication in
South Africa

The South African government has committed itself to the reduction of poverty, low wages and salaries, and extreme inequalities in wages and wealth generated by the apartheid system. The country has put in place various mechanisms that are aimed at meeting the basic needs of the people of South Africa, particularly the poor. The country has put in place programmes and initiatives aimed at ensuring that every South African has a decent living standard and economic security.

While a considerable effort has been made to improve the standard of living of the poor, the major challenge that is still facing the country is the spatial distribution of poverty that remains highly concentrated in three of the country’s nine provinces:
Free State (63%), North-West (62%) and Limpopo Province (59%), which have a large concentration of previously marginalised communities.

There is also a considerable variation in poverty concentration between rural and urban areas in
South Africa. A disproportionate number of poor people are children, with high incidences of visible malnutrition and stunting. The most seriously affected children are those in rural areas whose mothers have relatively little education. If South Africa does not put in place effective poverty interventions, the country is not likely to meet the Millennium Development Goal of halving poverty by 2015.

One of the main challenges of the government’s poverty eradication strategy is the availability of capacity to implement projects. It takes a long time for departments to spend the money they allocate for poverty initiatives. This is directly related to the fact that departments are being asked to perform functions that are not traditionally within the scope of their work, which means that they have to develop a particular kind of capacity to deal with the allocations.

The agencies tasked with the responsibility of assisting with the identification of viable poverty projects, disbursing money to poverty projects, and providing a monitoring and support service, such as the National Development Agency, are facing problems with capacity.

Recommendations

􀂉 The country should gear itself to enhance poverty eradication programmes whilst accelerating the completion of poverty relief projects.

􀂉 There is a need for reinforcing the implementation and expansion of Expanded Public Works Programmes, particularly at community level.

􀂉 The government and the private sector should explore innovative employment measures such as job sharing, worker share ownership and local substitution initiatives.

􀂉 The government should restructure the current poverty alleviation programmes in order to ensure that they are strongly integrated to Small and Micro Business Development initiatives.

􀂉 Municipalities, in particular, should play a more aggressive role in eradicating poverty in South Africa.

􀂉 Local government should assume their legally enshrined implementation powers to effectively implement poverty intervention measures.

􀂉 Municipal institutional capacity should be enhanced in order to ensure that they are able to manage existing resources and to mobilise additional resources in order to create self-sustainable projects that will empower local communities.

􀂉 Local government must play a critical role in supporting the contribution of civil society anti-poverty initiatives at local level in order to maximise their impact. This can be done through funding, sponsorships, and facilitating community involvement.

􀂉 The Departments of Education, Social Development, and Transport should have a co-ordinated approach to meeting the needs of learners with disabilities. The tendency is that disabled children use their grants to pay for transport to school and are required to have expensive devices that are key for them to access education, which result in a cross subsidisation by the three departments.

􀂉 There is a need to ensure that poverty interventions have long-term outcomes and are able to create employment opportunities for the poor and the unemployed in order to ensure that they are self-sustainable.

􀂉 There is a need for innovative approaches by civil society and the private sector to empower communities to be sustainable.

􀂉 Civil society organisations, particularly Community-Based- Organisations should play an active role in development projects, particularly in devising long-term term solutions to poverty, unemployment, and under-development.

Objective 3: Strengthening Policies, Delivery Mechanism and Outcomes in Healthcare in South Africa

The cornerstone of improving people’s access to health services in South Africa and making it more accessible has been the issue of transforming the health system from its fragmented and inequitable status to a health system that is integrated, inclusive and responsive to the needs of all South Africans.

In the transformation of the country’s healthcare system, the government has promulgated a number of pieces of legislation. The legislative framework also seeks to ensure that the broader South African society has equal access to healthcare, health services and facilities.

Whilst there have major achievements such as the establishment of a Unitary Public Health System, with the District Health System as its backbone, based on a primary healthcare approach, there still remain some challenges that inhibit the country’s progress towards providing effect access to healthcare.

These challenges included the migration of healthcare expert professionals to developed countries and the HIV and AIDS pandemic, which has posed more strain to the transformation of healthcare in
South Africa.

The major challenges facing healthcare in
South Africa is that many new clinics and the District Health System are not yet adequately functional because of a lack of personnel and finances, poor administration, and expanding demands. This is exacerbated by the fact that in many instances rural healthcare is compromised by lack of infrastructure, including basic services such as roads, water and electricity in the implementation of the Primary Healthcare approach.

Despite several interventions by government, the socio-economic profile of infant mortality in
South Africa also indicates that mortality is consistently higher in rural and peri-urban areas compared with urban areas. There are also striking differences in mortality rates by population group, with more infant and under-five mortality in the African population.

Childhood mortality rates in
South Africa also vary depending on whether the mother received any antenatal or delivery care. Mothers who receive neither antenatal nor delivery care or only one type of care suffer higher neonatal and infant mortality than mothers who receive both antenatal and delivery care.

Recommendations

􀂉 The country should foster more public and private interactions in improving access to quality healthcare in South Africa.

􀂉 The Department of Health, in particular, should enhance its strategy of creating more public-private healthcare initiatives, particularly in previously marginalised areas.

􀂉 The government should establish a strategy to co-ordinate the many different kinds of community health workers that provide care and support regarding HIV and AIDS and home-based care throughout the country.

􀂉 The government’s strategic interventions on the retention of South African health scarce expertise should be modelled more towards finding long-term solutions to the problem of scarce skills rather than on short-term interventions. This should start at school level with the encouragement of more learners to take science subjects and providing a comprehensive bursary scheme to first year students who are taking health degrees.

􀂉 There is a need to ensure the implementation of funds that are allocated for upgrading State and provincial hospitals to create an efficient and well-run alternative healthcare system to the private sector.

􀂉 The government should ensure the equitable redistribution of healthcare resources between urban and rural areas in order to provide rural communities access to quality healthcare.

􀂉 The government should intensify the participation of health beneficiaries in existing health governance structures such as hospital boards and health committees.

􀂉 There is a need for engaging the private sector to ensure that poor people get a pro rata discount to access private healthcare.

􀂉 Medical schemes should devise mechanisms to ensure that even those who earn less get access to medical aid schemes.

Strengthening policies, delivery mechanism and outcomes in combating HIV and AIDS in
South Africa South Africa has initiated a comprehensive response to communicable and non-communicable diseases. The country has also developed a comprehensive response to the adverse challenges of the HIV and AIDS pandemic. This includes access to medication, nutrition and information.

Various government departments have also initiated various initiatives that directly address the effects of the HIV and AIDS pandemic. Parliament, in particularly, has passed a number of laws that addresses public health issues posed by HIV and AIDS.

However, studies on the impact of HIV and AIDS in various sector of the South African society continue to highlight the ravaging impact of the pandemic in the labour market, economy and healthcare. Within the education system, students and educators continue to fall ill and die. Learners, especially girls, are dropping out of school in increasing numbers to take care of sick family members or to help support their families.

HIV and AIDS co-infection is leading to sharp increases in the incidence of tuberculosis (TB). The number of reported cases of TB has consistently risen since inception of the National TB Control Program (NTCP) that was launched in 1996.
KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape and Western Cape have the highest number of cases of TB. These provinces, together with the Northern Cape, also have incidences of TB, which are higher than the national average.

Recommendations

􀂉 There is a need for the government, civil society and the private sector to create a comprehensive ARV roll out literacy programme, particularly in previously marginalised communities where there are still negative perceptions about HIV treatment.

􀂉 The government should intensify prevention strategies in order to ensure that the level of awareness about the disease translates into behavioural change.

􀂉 The government should intensify its collaborative approach to the reduction of the spread of HIV, and address the socio-economic burden of AIDS morbidity and mortality, particularly between schools, churches and civil society in addressing the HIV and AIDS pandemic.

􀂉 There is a need for a comprehensive approach focus on prevention, treatment and care when dealing with the HIV and AIDS pandemic.

􀂉 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests to detect HIV in infants and young children must be available at all treatment and referral sites.

HIV PCR testing should be included as part of the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) and linked to immunisation coverage. This way, children will not be lost to follow up and can be identified easily.

􀂉 The government should undertake a situational analysis on the extent of the impact of HIV and AIDS on pensioners.

􀂉 Existing government service providers such as social workers, teachers and nurses, should be trained in addressing the needs and rights of children affected by HIV and AIDS.

􀂉 Education and advocacy concerning the treatment of children with HIV and AIDS within the medical profession must be improved so that children can benefit from the implementation of the Operational Plan on a much wider scale.

􀂉 More effort is needed to strengthen the Mother-to-Child Transmission (MTCT) programme, particularly in Provinces such as Mpumalanga where the programme seems not to have been implemented at all.

􀂉 There is a need for more sites with HIV counselling and testing.

􀂉 The government should intensify programmes that are aimed at ensuring that children who are infected by the disease have access to ARV’s.

􀂉 The Department of Health, in particular, should improve its health management systems in recording causes of death in order for the government to create appropriate responses to the pandemic.

Strengthening policies, delivery mechanism and outcomes in education in South Africa

Since 1994, the education system in South Africa has undergone significant and extensive restructuring aimed at redressing the long years of apartheid of unjust policies in education. This is reflected in the new policy and legislative framework that has been established to give effect to the goals and values that seek to achieve greater access and equity in education, particularly by poor communities. South Africa is also party to various international protocols that commit the country to expanding access to education.

Education in South Africa is also regarded as one of the most crucial measures to attaining economic and social development, particularly in redressing the legacy of apartheid. It forms one of the cornerstones of government policies such as the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) and the Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) Strategy. Since 1994, the broad focus in South Africa has been to improve access, quality and equity in education. Of the country’s over 12 million learners, more than 90% are currently in school. Net primary enrolment rates have remained steady at about 95.5% since 1995 and secondary participation rates are currently approximately 85% indicating increases in about 15 percentage points since the early 1990s. In addition, the male to female enrolment ratio is around 97% indicating the higher overall participation rate.

This is a far high enrolment rate than in most other developing countries.

South Africa has also put in place various measures aimed at ensuring that vulnerable learners such as those that are affected and infected by the HIV and AIDS pandemic, learners with disabilities and learners from rural areas, have access to education.

There is, however, an indication in some provinces that more money is still needed to address the endemic backlogs left by 40 years of apartheid education, where government resources were channelled into white education at the expense of black schools. This has presented a major challenge to the government’s efforts to rectify the imbalances in education in
South Africa.

The greatest challenge in redressing the legacy of apartheid lies in the poorer and rural provinces like the
Eastern Cape, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal.

Recommendations

􀂉 The government should ensure the effective implementation of the laws and policies that are aimed at removing barriers to education, including access to higher education.

􀂉 The government should abolish school fees in all farm schools as a standard policy.

􀂉 Farm schools should be consolidated into larger and better-funded rural education centres, which will be able to draw on a broad range of teaching talent and benefit from better resourcing and economies of scale.

􀂉 Adequate transport services should be provided to farm schools and in areas where learners have to walk long distances to and from school.

􀂉 Provincial departments of education should take a more active role in farm school management and governance.

􀂉 The Rural Education Policy should focus on the education of farm children as a way of transforming rural power relations and broadening social opportunities in farm labouring households.

􀂉 The government should set a target for eliminating illiteracy.

Objective 4: Ensuring Affordable Access to Water, Sanitation and Energy to all citizens in
South Africa, especially the rural poor Since the demise of the apartheid regime in 1994, the South African government has strongly located basic services for citizens within a rights based approach. Access to potable water, sanitation and electricity is enshrined in South Africa’s Constitution as a human right, as is the right to live in a healthy environment. South Africa’s legislative and policy framework reflects the urgent need to implement integrated, cross-sector approaches to water, sanitation and electricity services.

The welfare of poor communities with access to basic services in
South Africa has improved significantly in post-apartheid South Africa. The provision of free basic services to the poor has also resulted in several additional benefits. The electrification of clinics and schools has yielded significant benefits for improved health-care service provision, involvement of schools in evening adult education, and improved efficiency of school operations through use of equipment, such as photocopiers and computers. In certain cases, electric street lighting has contributed to reduced crime levels.

Of outmost importance is that the major challenge that is facing basic services in
South Africa is that the implementation of free basic services is a complex and demanding process, which requires a wide range of issues to be addressed locally and nationally, particularly in terms of infrastructure. In the rural parts of the country, it is difficult to determine the number of households benefiting from free basic services because many of these communities do not have the necessary monitoring mechanisms such as water metres.

Recommendations

􀂉 The allocation of powers and functions between District Municipalities and Local Municipalities needs to be resolved and co-ordinated in order to ensure the harmonisation of service delivery at local government level.

􀂉 The government should ensure the rationalisation of local government financial framework in order to support sustainable service provision, specifically with regard to the provision of free basic services and implementing appropriate pricing for services.

􀂉 The government should promote the Water Service Development Planning Process, within the framework of Integrated Development Plans, as the key instrument for planning, monitoring and regulating waster services, with full community involvement.

􀂉 Service provision should be demand-responsive rather than supply driven to ensure appropriate choices of technology, lower costs, better uses of resources and more sustainable services. The Water Service Development Plan should guide strategies related the choice of service levels and technology implemented.

􀂉 The government should ensure the development of an appropriate regulatory framework that ensures the effective, efficient, equitable and sustainable provision of basic sanitation services to all people living in South Africa, and cost-effective, reliable services to businesses and institutions.

􀂉 The Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, in particular, should look at more innovative water management mechanisms such as water-harvesting mechanisms by communities and creating dams in areas that are constantly facing floods.

Ensuring affordable access to Information Communication and Technology (ICT) in South Africa

Since 1994, South African has focused on the liberalisation of telecommunications through a new regulatory framework that has been aimed at ensuring affordable access to Information Communication Technology (ICT) for the poor, particularly those in the rural areas. The country’s vision to improve the quality of life of all South Africans by creating an information economy and a knowledge-based society has ensured that many South Africans have access to ICT’s. However, despite the legislative reform initiatives since 1994, the telecommunications sector in South Africa continues to be characterised by relative inaccessibility due to high retail prices, super profits, job losses, licensing delays and deadlocks, and minimal new foreign investment in the sector. Internet access is a great area of concern. Since 1994, it continues to increase by 6% to an estimated 1.1 million dial up subscribers.

Recommendations

􀂉 Free or subsidised telephone should be used as part of achieving universal service and access by the poor and those in rural areas.

􀂉 Effective competition and regulation should be adopted as guiding principles for achieving the strategic telecommunications policy objectives, including a restructuring of the market to encourage effective competition and the entry of new competitors and the empowerment of ICASA to execute its mandate in full.

􀂉 ICASA should investigate mechanisms to discourage profiteering through delaying tactics and the manipulation of the legal system.

􀂉 The local communications loop should be unbundled and line disconnections should be prohibited.

􀂉 Communication operators should fulfil their line roll-out obligations in under-serviced areas and this should be enforced by ICASA.

􀂉 ICASA should urgently investigate the high telephone prices and put in place mechanisms to regulate communication prices.

􀂉 The government should declare communication operators international gateways as essential services, and, in so doing, lower the cost of international calls.

􀂉 Emergency telephone services should be regarded as a basic human right, and such, should be freely extended to all subscribers.

􀂉 ICASA should ensure that there is continuous investment in upgrading the country’s communication infrastructure by making it obligatory for all subscribers to regularly review and upgrade their infrastructure in order to provide quality services to the poor.

Ensuring affordable access to housing (shelter) and land in South Africa Access to housing and land in South Africa is at the forefront of the national agenda for settlement and social transformation. It is also an integral part of government’s commitment to reduce poverty and improve the quality of people’s lives. In the last ten years, government has made tremendous strides in ensuring that access to land and housing becomes a reality to the people of
South Africa, especially the poor.

After the demise of the apartheid regime in 1994,
South Africa adopted the Reconstruction and Development Policy (RDP), as an integrated socioeconomic policy framework, which sets out broad guidelines for land and housing reform. The country’s Constitution provides further impetus to the progressive realisation of the right of citizens to land and housing. The provision of housing in South Africa is also in line with a strategy to provide subsidy assistance to households who are unable to satisfy their housing needs independently. The government has also put in place a comprehensive legislative framework to ensure that the people of South Africa have access to housing.

Although the new government inherited a critical housing shortage, with the 1996 Census reflecting a housing backlog of 2, 2 houses, since 1994, the State has built 1,8 million housing units, providing more than 5 million people with secure homes. Since 1994 to December 2002, the Department of Land Affairs has redistributed 456 060 hectares (ha) of State land. This constitutes 68% of targeted land (669 00 ha), and 23,8% of total redistributed land.

Through the tenure reform programme, a number of pieces of legislation that begin to regulate people’s occupation of and eviction from other people’s land.

Recommendations

􀂉 The government should ensure the empowerment of housing beneficiaries through the process of intensification of housing delivery, particularly through fostering SMME’s and cooperatives.

􀂉 The Department of Housing, in particular, should develop a housing strategy for rural communities and farm workers.

􀂉 The government should reduce policy incoherence and institutional fragmentation in housing delivery and clarify the role of provinces and municipalities in housing delivery.

􀂉 Housing delivery should take into account government’s commitment to social cohesion and integrating communities.

􀂉 The issue of women’s access to land and property rights remains a critical impediment to the furthering of women’s rights in South Africa.

Customary practices that prohibit women from owning land should be abolished.

􀂉 The government should engage the private sector, particularly banks in eliminating barriers to housing finance, particularly for people who do not qualify for the government housing subsidy.

�� The government should start building family houses that take into consideration cultural sensitivities and the sizes of families in order to enhance social cohesion.

Objective 5: Progress Towards Gender Equality in all Critical Areas of Concern, including Equal Access to Education for Girls at all Levels in South Africa

South Africa stands out in Africa and, indeed, in the world in having succeeded in bringing large numbers of women into formal politics since 1994. The country’s commitment towards gender equality clearly demonstrates that it is imperative that more women are elected into public office, in line with giving substance to a culture of human rights.

South Africa's transition from apartheid and minority rule to democracy required that all existing practices, institutions and values be reviewed and rethought in terms of their fitness for ensuring equality for all the people of the country, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, religion, and social status.

The transformation of higher education in
South Africa was seen as a major instrument to fostering equal opportunities for women. After the demise of the apartheid regime, it was imperative for the country to redress past inequalities by ensuring that the higher education system serves a new social order, to meet the pressing national needs, and to respond to new realities and opportunities.

Recommendations

􀂉 Government departments and entities should establish National Gender Policy Frameworks in order to guide gender transformation in their staff composition. The purpose of the frameworks would be to ensure the effective implementation of a gender perspective into all aspects of planning, policy, legislation, development and transformation activities within the government.

􀂉 The principles of equal opportunities and equal partnership between male and female staff in government departments and entities should be reflected and promoted through the adoption of gender codes. The codes should state explicitly the government’s commitment to ensure equity.

􀂉 The various departments should provide detailed progress reports on their employment equity plans and targets when reporting to Parliament.

􀂉 The Department of Education and higher education institutions need to mainstream gender into all their human resources policies, programmes and structures in order to ensure more education opportunities to women.

􀂉 The Council on Higher Education should establish a selection and recruitment policy that will focus more on the recruitment of women professionals in the higher education sector.

􀂉 All government departments and entities should use pro forma reporting tools (percentages and numbers) in order to allow quantifiable scrutiny by Parliament and the public, particularly civil society.

Objective 6: Encouraging Broad-based Participation in Development by all Stakeholders at all Levels in South Africa

With increasing decentralisation of governance responsibilities and decisionmaking in post apartheid South Africa to lower-levels of government, local institutions, communities and public participation have emerged as fundamental tenets in the promotion of local governance in South Africa.

Since the demise of the apartheid regime in 1994,
South Africa has put in place various mechanisms and measures to ensure that the broader population are active participants in the governance of the affairs of the country. The country has introduced various legislative and policy measures that are aimed at ensuring that the people of South Africa are active participants in the governance of the country.

Within the country’s evolving democratic culture, there are still challenges that are confronting the effectiveness of the country’s measures to foster broader participation, including poor communication, lack of information, and complicated processes.

Recommendations

􀂉 Municipalities, in particular, should enhance their programmes of public participation in order to ensure constant interaction with communities.

􀂉 Municipalities should improve the content and structure of IDP’s in order to enhance the involvement of vulnerable groups such as people with disabilities, women, and the youth.

􀂉 Provincial governments should enhance their public participation measures.

􀂉 Parliament should launch a comprehensive awareness campaign explaining the various protocols governing participation in parliamentary activities such as public hearings and making submissions.

􀂉 Parliament should comprehensively restructure participation of and mass communication with vulnerable and marginalised groups.

􀂉 Parliament should ensure a creative and effective resourcing as well as utilisation of Parliamentary Constituency Offices in order to ensure that they play a major role in interacting with and educating communities about Parliament.

􀂉 All political parties should allocate sufficient constituency resources in order to ensure that they constantly keep in touch with the people and are able to inform the public about Parliamentary activities.

􀂉 There is a need for the usage of plain language in policy documents and laws in order to ensure that ordinary people are able to comprehend them.

􀂉 Where major laws and policies are promulgated, comprehensive awareness campaigns should be undertaken to inform communities about them.

􀂉 Parliament and government should give the public sufficient time to make submissions or comments.

􀂉 There is a need to capacitate community representatives about the Integrated Development Planning process to ensure that they are able to sufficiently educate communities about their value in enhancing participation.

􀂉 Parliament should put in place a mechanism to respond and attend to formally public queries.

􀂉 Parliament should enhance the integration of and participation of civil society in its oversight work, particularly in initiatives that are aimed at taking Parliament to the people.

􀂉 Parliament should ratify and implement the resolution taken by the 113th General Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union on the importance of civil society in a democracy.

Community Consultations

One of the primary objectives of Parliament’s involvement in
South Africa’s Peer Review process was to facilitate public awareness and ensure meaningful public participation in Parliament’s APRM self-assessment process. Community consultations were conducted in rural, semi–urban and urban municipalities. Approximately seven thousand people participated in the community meetings and 1 052 written submissions were received.

Key Findings The following is a synthesis of the responses received to questions extrapolated from the four thematic sections of the APRM questionnaire.

Democracy & Good Political Governance

Communities were engaged on the following questions:

1. Do you have access to justice, e.g. access to maintenance and domestic violence protection orders for women? Do you have access to basic services such as clean water and proper sanitation facilities?

3. Has your relationship with Parliament (or provincial legislature) changed since 1994 in terms of access to Parliament and participation in the activities of Parliament? Do you know who the Members of Parliament are in your province and are you able to access them for assistance when needed? Accessibility of courts emerged as a consistent challenge in municipalities across the geographic and socio-economic spectrum. The factors that hinder accessibility were more severe in semi-urban and rural communities. These included:

􀂉 Distance to courts

􀂉 Transport costs

􀂉 Requirement for multiple visits due to daily court rolls not being concluded

􀂉 Safety and security at courts particularly for women seeking redress against violence

The lack of basic services was a pervasive experience, particularly in rural communities. These included:

􀂉 Lack of or erratic supply of potable water and water for irrigation

􀂉 Inadequate sanitation

􀂉 Lack of electrification

􀂉 Sustainable and affordable energy
Communities were largely unaware of the role of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures. Communities were not knowledgeable about their political representatives at provincial and national levels. Local Government representatives however interacted with their local communities. Some communities suggested that this situation could be obviated by the introduction of a constituency-based electoral system.

The level and quality of service delivery was cited as an area for improvement. Poor service delivery was compounded by negative attitudes and conduct of certain public servants. This confirmed the need to infuse the Batho Pele principles throughout the public service.

Economic Governance and Management

Communities were engaged on the following questions:

1. Do you think ordinary citizens are getting opportunities to generate an income, whether short-term or long-term?

2. Do you think the government tells you enough about the budget and what it intends to do with the taxes collected?

3. Do you think the budget is managed properly? Are you aware of the anti-corruption forum and other anti-corruption initiatives in the country? Is this information accessible at local level? If not, what can you recommend to make it more accessible? What is the level of corruption in your own community? How can the government and communities work together to fight corruption effectively? Income generation with particular focus on youth was considered a priority across all communities. This included:

􀂉 Government support of entrepreneurship

􀂉 Access to business finance, skills development and information on business management There was a lack of awareness on the budget process and communities therefore expressed the need for more active participation in the budget process.

Communities were unaware of government’s anti-corruption initiatives.

Communities reported that corruption at local government manifested mainly in:

􀂉 Allocation of RDP houses

􀂉 Awarding of tenders in municipalities

􀂉 Nepotism in the public sector

􀂉 Inefficient / inappropriate management of social security grants Communities expressed the need for improved public finance management to achieve targeted spending and thereby minimize opportunities for corruption.

Corporate Governance

Communities were engaged on the following questions:

1. Do companies in
South Africa look after the environment?

2. How do you think companies in
South Africa assist the communities in which they operate?

Communities cited environmental degradation and pollution as evidence that companies were non-compliant with environmental regulations. Pollution impacted negatively on the health of communities.

Communities articulated a lack of local investment by companies. This was compounded by a lack of policy regarding employment of local communities and preferential procurement from local small businesses.

Socio-Economic Development

Questions on social development were divided into three areas: Social Assistance

1. How effective are government systems and programmes that are aimed at protecting the poor?

2. What are the challenges faced and should be the role of Parliament in addressing such challenges? Communities acknowledged social security as one of government’s poverty alleviation mechanisms. Some concerns raised and suggestions forwarded by communities included:

􀂉 Grants not reaching intended beneficiaries

􀂉 Age and gender disparity for access to old age pensions

􀂉 More effective poverty alleviation mechanism would be the replacement of cash grants with food vouchers

􀂉 Perceived correlation between increased teenage pregnancies and the child support grant

Education.

Have the new laws in education improved access to education? What are the challenges faced in the education sector in
South Africa and what should be the role of Parliament in addressing such challenges?

Access to and quality of education was constrained by:

􀂉 Unaffordability of school fees and uniforms

􀂉 Lack of integrated planning

􀂉 Lack of transport and roads infrastructure

􀂉 High learner : educator ratio, particularly in rural schools

􀂉 Lack of government-funded facilities for early childhood education  Healthcare Is it becoming easier and better for your community to access healthcare services? How should healthcare be improved and what should be the role of Parliament in this? Access to basic health care was cited as a challenge across all communities.

This included:

􀂉 Inadequate primary healthcare facilities, medical personnel, medicines and treatment

�� Poorly managed healthcare facilities

􀂉 Poor working conditions and remuneration of healthcare professionals resulting in low morale and poor service delivery

􀂉 Lack of infrastructure and facilities for the aged and people with disabilities

􀂉 Lack of nutritional support for people living with HIV

Conclusion

The report reflects the views and lived experiences of a cross-section of South Africans. It would be important for Parliament, Government and civil society organisations to further investigate some of the issues raised. It would appear that
South Africa has a sound legal and policy framework for the consolidation of democracy, the progressive realisation of socio-economic rights and the acceleration of development. The unintended consequences of policy and legislation, service delivery and the capacity of local government may however require more focussed attention.