1. Sixty-First Report of Standing Committee on Public Accounts: FAIS OMBUD, dated 15 March 2006:
INTRODUCTION
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts, having considered the Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the FAIS OMBUD for the year ended 31 March 2005, tabled in Parliament and referred to it, reports as follows:
AUDIT OPINION
The Committee noted the unqualified audit opinion expressed by Auditor- General, and trusts that future audit opinions will be equally unqualified.
CONCLUSION
The Committee is of the view that no further interaction with the Accounting Authority of the FAIS OMBUD is necessary for the financial year under review.
The Committee therefore awaits the next Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor-General.
2. Sixty-Second Report of Standing Committee on Public Accounts: PAETA, dated 15 March 2006:
INTRODUCTION
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts, having considered the Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the Primary Agriculture Education and Training Authority (PAETA) for the year ended 31 March 2005, tabled in Parliament and referred to it, reports as follows:
AUDIT OPINION
The Committee noted the unqualified audit opinion expressed by the Auditor-General, and trusts that future audit opinions will be equally unqualified.
CONCLUSION
The Committee is of the view that no further interaction with the Accounting Authority of PAETA is necessary for the financial year under review.
The Committee therefore awaits the next Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor General.
3. Sixty-Third Report of Standing Committee on Public Accounts: FASSET, dated 15 March 2006:
INTRODUCTION
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts, having considered the Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the FASSET for the year ended 31 March 2005, tabled in Parliament and referred to it, reports as follows:
AUDIT OPINION
The Committee noted the unqualified audit opinion expressed by the Auditor-General, and trusts that future audit opinions will be equally unqualified.
CONCLUSION
The Committee is of the view that no further interaction with the Accounting Authority of the FASSET is necessary for the financial year under review.
The Committee therefore awaits the next Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor General.
4. Sixty-Fourth Report of Standing Committee on Public Accounts: CTFL – SETA, dated 15 March 2006:
INTRODUCTION
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts, having considered the Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the Clothing, Textiles, Footwear and Leather Education and Training Authority (CTFL-SETA) for the year ended 31 March 2005, tabled in Parliament and referred to it, reports as follows:
AUDIT OPINION
The Committee noted the unqualified audit opinion expressed by the Auditor-General, and trusts that future audit opinions will be equally unqualified.
CONCLUSION
The Committee is of the view that no further interaction with the Accounting Authority of the CTFL-SETA is necessary for the financial year under review.
The Committee therefore awaits the next Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor General.
5. Sixty-Fifth Report of Standing Committee on Public Accounts: BANKSETA, dated 15 March 2006:
INTRODUCTION
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts, having considered the Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the BANKSETA for the year ended 31 March 2005, tabled in Parliament and referred to it, reports as follows:
AUDIT OPINION
The Committee noted the unqualified audit opinion expressed by the Auditor-General, and trusts that future audit opinions will be equally unqualified.
CONCLUSION
The Committee is of the view that no further interaction with the Accounting Authority of the BANKSETA is necessary for the financial year under review.
The Committee therefore awaits the next Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor General.
6. Sixty-Sixth Report of Standing Committee on Public Accounts: Construction Industry Development Board, dated 15 March 2006:
INTRODUCTION
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts, having considered the Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) for the year ended 31 March 2005, tabled in Parliament and referred to it, reports as follows:
AUDIT OPINION
The Committee noted the unqualified audit opinion expressed by the Auditor-General, and trusts that future audit opinions will be equally unqualified.
CONCLUSION
The Committee is of the view that no further interaction with the Accounting Authority of the CIDB is necessary for the financial year under review.
The Committee therefore awaits the next Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor General.