NARRATIVE SUMMARY

PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION ON DEMOGRAPIC REFLECTIONS - AN AUDIT OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE

 

 

1.                   OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION

 

The presentation will provide a background to the conducting of the audit, its objectives, the methodology followed and limitations experienced.  It will present the analytical framework used to conduct the audit whereafter the key findings are addressed.  The demographic reflections of the public service as at June 2006 are then presented whereafter the recommendations that emanated from the audit are reflected upon.

 

 

2.         BACKGROUND

 

This project stems from the commitment and mandate of the Public Service Commission (PSC) that critical transformational policies, such as Affirmative Action (AA), need to be evaluated, as these support broader governance objectives.  The periodic assessment of such policies presents the Executive and Parliament with timely information enabling them to respectively take corrective action and perform their oversight role.

 

This report builds on an earlier report by the PSC, the State of Representativeness in the Public Service (2000), which provided a largely quantitative overview of progress in the first five years of democracy. This report covers the entire 10 year period, and also provides a more analytical perspective to AA. 

 

The South African state, apart from having to implement transformational policies, has also had to transform itself over the past 10 years, so as to reflect current demographics, and through this become more responsive to the needs of the previously disenfranchised population.  It needs to be underscored that AA cannot be viewed simplistically as changing race, gender and disability profiles; it is fundamentally about making these changes in order to deliver more effectively.  It thus needs to be recognised that there is a dynamic relationship between achieving Affirmative Action on the one hand and transforming the state and society on the other.

 

Transformational policies are generally difficult to implement, and more so when these deal with sensitive issues rooted in historic conditions that have caused race, gender and disability imbalances.  At the heart of this transformation process is the recognition and willingness by decision-makers to move beyond their personal interests and views, and show commitment through action by making transformational decisions.  In this regard the commitment from civil servants, irrespective of their race or gender, to implement government policy, is essential.

 

This audit shows that progress in achieving AA has been varied, both at the national and provincial levels.  By analysing progress across various indicators, it has been found that much more needs to be done, both in terms of achieving the numeric targets, as well as addressing the empowerment dimension. 

 

3.         OBJECTIVES OF THE AUDIT

 

The objectives of the audit were to –

 

·         Determine the extent to which government Departments have complied with policy and legislative requirements and measures, taking into account national and provincial demographics. An assessment is made of constraints and/or barriers that are being experienced in meeting the regulatory requirements (compliance).

·         Audit the effectiveness and efficiency (efficacy) of the systems, processes and procedures used to monitor and evaluate the implementation of AA in the entire human resource management chain (monitor and evaluate the implementation of AA).

·         Audit the extent to which AA practices empower the designated groups to fulfill their employment obligations. This includes an assessment of human resource management practices starting from recruitment, selection, induction processes and retention programmes. The process of assessment should take into account the work already done by the PSC on recruitment and selection and other related reports (empowerment).

·         Present a comprehensive analysis based on the above of the success and failures of AA and recommend requirements for further implementation.

 

4.         METHODOLOGY

 

The scope of work of the project focused on the following issues:

 

·         A review of human resource management practices, policies and procedures currently in use in the public service with a view to producing a conceptual framework document that defines the empowerment aspect(s) of affirmative action.

·         Gathering and collating qualitative and quantitative data through engagements with national and provincial Departments and other relevant stakeholders, accessing baseline information.

·         An analytical review of the empowerment practices as a means towards achieving affirmative action within the public service.  This is meant to focus on whether affirmative action has been able to achieve reasonable empowerment within the public service and ensure that reasonable accommodation is made to the known functional limitations of otherwise qualified individuals with disability and other designated groups.

·         Review Human Resource Management processes with specific assessment of personnel practices to ensure that job applicants and employees from designated groups, particularly with disabilities, are considered for all job vacancies and training opportunities, and are not stereotyped in a manner which limits their access to all jobs for which they are qualified.

·         A quantitative and qualitative analysis of affirmative action to determine whether the requirements as laid down in policy and legislative documents are being implemented, monitored and evaluated.

·         A trend analysis and comparison of the implementation of AA in government Departments in the national and provincial spheres of government to measure compliance, efficacy and empowerment across government Departments.

·         A broad and comprehensive account of the success and barriers of affirmative action using empowerment, efficacy and compliance perspectives as units of analysis.

 

·         Benchmarking best and worst practices in implementation, monitoring and evaluation of affirmative action, which can be made available for learning within the public service and beyond.

 

The following data gathering methods were used:

 

·         Desktop Literature Review.  This was done to determine elements of the human resource value chain that are relevant to AA policies and procedures to be monitored and evaluated by the PSC.

·         Personnel Data Review. Mainly to draw statistical data and use such data to review the extent to which national and provincial Departments comply with the set numeric targets.

·         National Affirmative Action Survey. The survey was used to collect empirical data from Departments by means of a self-administered standard audit questionnaire based on the AA audit’s terms of reference, preliminary literature review and the audit conceptual framework.

·         Audit Sample. The audit focused on the entire Public Service, defined as involving all national and provincial Departments as set out in the Public Service Act, 1994.

 

Responsiveness of Departments

 

·         15 National Departments submitted late.

·         19 provincial Departments did not submit at all  with the biggest transgressor being Limpopo.

 

5.         LIMITATIONS

 

In terms of the quantitative analysis the study relied on the survey questionnaire and the data as on 30 April 2005 from VULINDLELA. One of the problems when dealing with the comparison of change over time was the manner in which the various levels are defined. The VULINDLELA system provided data according to salary levels, but Departments responded by presenting data according to occupational categories as per their employment equity reporting requirements to the Department of Labour. This meant that the data between the two sources needed to be reconciled.

 

A further problem related to the delays in returning information, and given that extensions were provided, the information from certain Departments was not used, and in some cases information was of poor quality.

 

For purposes of this presentation, therefore, and to give as up to date reflections on the demographics of the public service as possible, data that has been obtained from Vulindlela as at June 2006 will be used.

 

6.         ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

 

AA is implemented through programmes designed in terms of the adopted policy framework, namely the White Paper on Affirmative Action (WPAA). The WPAA sets out mandatory requirements that Departments should comply with to implement AA programmes. The WPAA sketches the accountability, monitoring, coordinating and reporting responsibilities of various role players within AA programmes. Compliance and efficacy aspects of this audit were predicated on these policy requirements.

 

The compliance element of the audit focuses on the extent to which government Departments conform to the prescribed policy and regulatory requirements, as obliged to in terms of goals, objectives, targets and implementation framework set out. Based on the mandatory requirements of the WPAA, the following indicators were derived from the WPAA and used for the compliance aspect of affirmative action against which Departments’ compliance was assessed:

 

·         Numeric Targets.

·         Employee Profile.

·         Affirmative Action Survey.

·         Management Practices Review.

·         Performance Management.

·         Affirmative Action Plan.

·         Responsibilities.

·         Policy Statement.

 

The assessment of the efficacy element of the audit focused on determining the effectiveness of the systems, processes and procedures used to monitor and evaluate the implementation of AA.  In order to measure how well AA is implemented, a set of indicators was developed. These would provide a conceptual instrument to measure the quality of the AA implementation process. These are:

 

·         Policy communication and training;

·         Policy planning and review;

·         Programme design and development;

·         Performance and resource management;

·         Extent of integration and alignment with the broader public service management, reform, transformation initiatives;

·         Stakeholder involvement and participation;

·         Openness, transparency and accountability; and

·         Executive and management leadership.

 

The focus on empowerment was an attempt to go beyond the compliance and effectiveness elements of the audit in order to understand the substantive issues that lie beneath the numbers. It attempted to measure the extent to which AA practices empower the designated groups to fulfill their employment obligations. Empowerment indicators were identified based on the provisions of the WPAA namely:

 

·         New Employee Appointment, Recruitment and Selection.

·         Personnel Orientation and Induction.

·         Individual Development Planning.

·         Career Guidance and Counselling.

·         Mentoring and Coaching.

·         Performance Management and Feedback.

·         Human Performance Plan Management.

·         Recognition and Reward.

·         Promotions and Succession Planning.

·         Training and Development Management.

·         Leadership and Management Development.

·         Transfer and Retention.

·         Reasonable Accommodation.

 

 

 

7.         KEY FINDINGS

 

Compliance Aspect of Affirmative Action

 

The audit found that whilst overall progress is being made with the setting of AA targets, there are significant challenges for the effective compliance with the policy requirements on AA.  It appears that most national Departments perform very well in terms of compliance with AA target requirements as compared to provincial Departments.  The quantitative analysis of AA revealed that although a general improvement in representation of Blacks at national Departments has taken place in middle management (56% Blacks as opposed to 44% Whites) and senior management (68% Blacks as opposed to 32% Whites), Departments still have a long way to go to meet the 75% target set for Blacks for April 2005.  As far as gender representation is concerned, women make up 56% of all employees within the Public Service whilst they only represent 30,5% at middle and senior management level.  As far as people with disabilities are concerned only 0, 3% are employed in both national and provincial Departments, which is way below the set target of 2%.

 

Improvement is still required in the areas of employee profiling, conducting AA surveys and allocation of responsibilities.  Overall it appears that progress is made on the initial administrative processes such as setting of targets and developing the AA/EE plans while the actual implementation processes critical for the attainment of targets and objectives in the AA/EE plans remain a serious challenge.

 

As far as conducting AA surveys is concerned, it was found that only (28%) of national Departments conduct AA surveys whilst the majority (72%) do not.  At a provincial level AA surveys were mostly conducted with Departments in provinces such as the Eastern Cape, Free State, Western Cape, North West and KwaZulu Natal.  No such surveys were reported to be conducted in Gauteng, Mpumalanga and the Northern Cape.  Those Departments that do not conduct surveys claim to have addressed the matter by for example, consulting staff and unions through departmental bargaining councils and/or EE consultative forums.

 

The periodicity of conducting management reviews in national Departments was uneven, whilst more than (80%) of the Departments in the Western Cape reported that they review management practices on a quarterly basis.  Most of the Departments within Mpumalanga, Eastern Cape and the Free State do not perform management practices reviews at all.

 

The integration of AA accountability into performance management systems was found to be uneven across national and provincial Departments.  It is of concern that this is not reflected in the performance agreements of senior managers. 

 

In many instances it was found that the process followed in national and provincial Departments in developing and implementing the AA programmes is inconsistent and not necessarily aligned to the guidelines provided in the WPAA.  It appeared that most Departments tend to use the Employment Equity Act (EEA) as a guide for their affirmative action programmes as they follow the process outlined in the EEA as against the requirements of the WPAA.  Most of the national and provincial Departments have, however, developed AA plans or employment equity (EE) plans.

 

There appears to be no consensus by the various role players regarding the responsibility for the implementation of AA.  This varies between senior management and a combination of roles and responsibilities for different staff within a department.  This uncertainty about roles and responsibilities and the absence of formal lines of accountability for the implementation of AA is one of the barriers for the successful implementation of AA.  The absence of a mechanism to enforce compliance with AA policy and other human resource policies and regulations is a perennial challenge facing the Public Service.

 

Most Departments did not identify barriers to fulfil AA requirements.  In those instances where barriers were identified a combination of factors were mentioned of which unavailability/scarcity of skills from designated groups was the most cited factor.  More than (60%) of national and provincial Departments did take action to overcome barriers by developing recruitment strategies and the forging of links with organisations for designated groups (people with disabilities).

 

Technical requirements that facilitate the implementation of AA reveal discrepancies between the extent to which there is administrative compliance and actual implementation.  This is due to the fact that the methods used in implementing AA may not necessarily be in line with the requirements of the WPAA or that they may not be well documented to facilitate learning from best practice across provinces.  In some cases, such as the Western Cape and Free State, there is administrative compliance (which may come across as positive), yet in terms of what ultimately counts, that is changing the legacy of apartheid, progress is limited. In the case of provinces such as Mpumalanga and the Eastern Cape there is poor administrative compliance (which may come across as negative), yet actual performance in changing the demography is good.

 

Provinces may demonstrate high levels of administrative compliance, yet perform poorly at the level of implementation.  Therefore, the development of AA plans and setting of targets in isolation cannot be viewed as a singular indicator of progress with implementation of AA in the public service.  Department specific and province specific incremental targets are critical if AA is to change the demographics of the public sector to be in line with the demographics of the country.

 

Implementation of AA (Efficacy Aspect)

 

Most Departments have specific criteria, such as giving preference to applicants for employment based on race gender and disability, for recruiting and selecting people from designated groups.  Departments do however, experience difficulties in managing data on AA appointments, recruitment and selection.  From generating employee profiles to monitoring and evaluating the outcomes of the policy implementation, many Departments have been found wanting.

 

Most national and provincial Departments do conduct reviews of the implementation of the AA policy.  Despite Departments’ involvement in reviews, it was found that they are still preoccupied with day-to-day routine administration of personnel transactions and have not focused on key strategic areas such HR Planning and organisational development.  The human resource components in many Departments still do not link their daily work with the business strategies of the Departments they serve.  As a result, key transformation result areas such as affirmative action tend to suffer.

 

Most national and less than half of all provincial Departments have designed programmes aimed at training managers to implement AA.  It was however, found that overall training offered and strategies adopted varied considerably.

 

The policy requirements on the lines of responsibility and accountability (leadership for AA) in Departments as outlined in the WPAA appear not to be adhered to.  This legislative deficiency opens possibilities where there is no centralised mechanism through which progress of AA is effectively monitored and a global perspective of the challenges faced by the provinces and national Departments is adopted.

 

Empowerment Aspect of Affirmative Action

 

Although most national and provincial Departments have and conduct an orientation and induction programme for new recruits and designated groups based on specifically designed strategies, more than a third of the Departments tend to adopt generic empowerment practices.  It is assumed that employees from designated groups will benefit from these generic approaches.

 

Most national Departments have personal development plans for staff and implement these through their performance management systems or as part of their Human Resource Development (HRD) strategy.  There is, however, a high level of disparity across provinces on the mechanisms and approach used to implement personal development plans.

 

In general there is a challenge for Departments on career guidance and counselling in that such programmes are not properly implemented or the benefits from such initiatives are not yet discernable.

 

Whilst (51%) of national Departments have mentoring and coaching interventions (56%) of provincial Departments did not.  At both national and provincial Departments line managers are assigned the role of being mentors.  In many instances managers’ mentoring and coaching programmes are administered on an ad-hoc basis.

 

Most national and provincial Departments have recognition and reward mechanisms in place to ensure that the employees from designated groups are recognized and valued when they perform exceptionally well.  This also serves to encourage and maintain their performance at a high standard. The directives from the Department of Public Service and Administration are used to guide the granting of rewards.

 

No or inadequate records of promotions and succession are kept at both national and provincial Departments.  This situation reflects negatively on succession planning in the public service, particularly commitment to the career progression of employees from designated groups.  It is critical for this aspect to be addressed as lack of career progression may lead to frustration for employees.

 

National Departments either use personal development plans or departmental strategic objectives to identify training needs, whilst conducting skills audits is a mechanism mostly used at provincial Departments to identify training needs of employees.  Proper records are kept of the type of training, with data on employees trained broken down according to occupational categories.  Since identification of training needs is generic, it was difficult to determine the success of such training in the absence of predetermined AA training objectives for employees from designated groups.

 

There are no specific leadership and management development interventions for employees from designated groups reported in national and provincial Departments.  Similarly, there are no support mechanisms specifically designed for employees from designated groups in middle and senior management.

 

The reason mostly cited by employees from designated groups for a transfer to another institution was better career opportunities followed by better working environment and better pay/package.  Inability to fulfil responsibilities was the least mentioned reason.

 

Most Departments reported that they have incorporated issues of reasonable accommodation such as access to work areas, modification of facilities and flexible working hours in their AA plans.  The most mentioned aspect regarding reasonable accommodation is the elimination of physical infrastructural barriers, followed by language flexibility, flexible working hours and provision of assistive devices or equipment for people with disabilities.

 

8.         DEMOGRAPHIC REFLECTIONS OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE

 

Cabinet set a target of 30% representation of women in senior management positions, 75% black in senior management positions and 2% for people with disabilities in the Public Service by March 2005.

 

These targets have since been reviewed and Cabinet has approved that women must occupy 50% of posts at senior management level. The target that 75% of senior managers must be black has been maintained. This must be achieved by 31 March 2009. The 2% target for employment of people with disabilities remains unchanged and must be achieved by 31 March 2010.

 

As indicated demographic statistics drawn from Vulindlela as at June 2006 is presented:

 

The situation for the entire Public Service is as follows:

 

n       PUBLIC SERVICE (OVERALL)

v      Africans            843 259 – 74%            

v      Asians                41 004 – 4%   

v      Coloured           100 514 – 10%

v      Whites              140 973 – 12%             

 

n       GENDER

v      Female                         607 262 – 53.9%

v      Male                 518 488 – 46%

 

 

At senior management level the following applies:

 

n       PUBLIC SERVICE (SMS)

v      Africans            3 923 – 55%     

v      Asians                 554 – 8%                  

v      Coloured              549 – 8%      

v      Whites              2 063 – 29%

 

n       GENDER

v      Female                         2 084 – 29%

v      Male                 5 005 – 71%

 

 

 

 

At national level the following applies:

 

n       NATIONAL DEPARTMENTS - SMS                    OVERALL

v      Africans           2086 – 54%                   189 257 – 68%

v      Asian                 292 – 7%                        7 929 –  3%

v      Coloured            293 – 7.6%                    29 644 – 11%

v      White               1190 – 31%                     50 403            – 18%

n       GENDER

v      Female            1 182 – 31%                    96 292 – 35%

v      Male               2 679 – 69%                  180 941– 65%

 

           All persons with disabilities – 0,2%

 

At provincial level, the following applies:

 

EASTERN CAPE

           

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL        

v      African    -  228 – 68%                            104 167 – 87%

v      Indian      -    27 – 6%                                    637 – 0.5%

v      Coloured-    34 – 8%                                  8 355 – 6.9%

v      White      -    90 – 20%                              6  315 – 5.2%

 

n       Gender

v      Female -  121 – 27%                                 79 123 – 66%

v      Male     -  318 – 63%                                  40  351 – 33.8%

 

            All persons with disabilities         -  0,07%

 

 

FREE STATE

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL

v      African  - 153 – 52%                               44370 – 80%

v      Asian    -  5 – 2%                                         70 – 0.1%

v      Coloured-  16 – 5%                                  1868 – 3%      

v      White    -  120 – 41%                                8860 – 16%

n       Gender

v      Female -  83 – 28%                               33754 – 61%

v      Male     -  211 – 72%                              21 414 – 39%

 

            All persons with disabilities – 0,06%

 

GAUTENG

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL

v      African  - 343 – 50%                               87 019 – 74%   

v      Asian    -  62 – 9%                                   3 122 – 2.6%

v      Coloured   41 – 6%                                  4 151 – 4%

v      White   -  242 – 35%                               22 247 – 19%

n       Gender

v      Female -  214 – 31%                              79 488 – 68%

v      Male     -  474 – 69%                               37 051 – 32%

                                   

            All persons with disabilities – 0,10%

 

KWAZULU-NATAL

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL

v      African    327 – 55%                              130 823 – 82%

v      Asian      118 – 20%                              180 014 – 11%

v      Coloured     10 – 2%                                  2 869 – 2%

v      White       138 – 23%                                  8 167 – 5%   

n       Gender

v      Female   181 – 31%                             105 317 – 66%

v      Male       412 – 69%                                            54 556 – 34%

 

            All persons with disabilities – 0,12%

 

 

LIMPOPO

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL

v      African     324 – 88%                              112 427  – 97%

v      Asian         11 – 3%                                      188  – 0.1%

v      Coloured     2 – 0.5%                                     143  – 0.1%

v      White         31 – 8%                                   2 694  – 2%

n       Gender

v      Female    119 – 32%                                 64 912 – 56%

v      Male         249 – 68%                                80 540 – 44%

 

            All persons with disabilities – 0,22%

 

MPUMALANGA

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL

v      African  196 – 84%                                51 485 – 90%

v      Asian          6 – 3%                                    267 – 0.4%

v      Coloured    1 – 0.4%                                   361 – 0.6%

v      White        29 – 12%                                4 781 – 8%

n       Gender

v      Female 68 – 29%                                 39 972 – 63%

v      Male     164 – 71%                                 23 029 – 37%

 

            All persons with disabilities – 0,07%

 

WESTERN CAPE

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL

v      African       53 – 15%                             12 670 – 18%

v      Asian         18 – 5%                                    589 – 0.8%

v      Coloured    106 – 31%                            43 109 – 61%

v      White        170 – 49%                              13 966 – 20%

n       Gender

v      Female 77 – 22%                                  44 933 – 64%

v      Male     270 – 78%                                 25 401 – 36%

 

            All persons with disabilities – 0,26%

 

NORTH WEST

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL

v      African    200 – 75%                              57 074 – 90%

v      Asian        13 – 5%                                    303 – 0.4%

v      Coloured     10 – 4%                                   868 – 1.3%

v      White         44 –             16%                                4 756 – 8%

n       Gender

v      Female    87 – 33%                               39 972 – 63%

v      Male        180 – 67%                              23 029 – 37%

 

 

 

NORTHERN CAPE

n       SMS                                                                 OVERALL

v      African      64 – 47%                              6 040 – 35%

v      Asian         11 –             8%                                     75 – 0.4%

v      Coloured      41 – 30%                            8 360 – 50%

v      White         21 – 15%                             2 619 – 15.3%

n       Gender

v      Female   35 – 26%                                10 640 – 62%

v      Male     102 – 74%                                   6 454 – 38%                                              

                

All persons with disabilities – 0,13%

 

 

9.         RECOMMENDATIONS

 

Compliance

 

Targets have been set within a broader political and policy environment, and therefore have a legitimacy which needs to be adhered to.  As the study has indicated there is a marked variation in the extent to which there has been compliance with AA targets and record-keeping, both between national and provincial Departments, and between provincial Departments themselves.  To address these deficiencies, the following recommendations are made:

 

All government Departments should engage in a concerted effort to employ people with disabilities across all salary levels, but more so at middle and senior management levels.

 

The periodicity of monitoring targets should be increased especially with regard to senior and middle management and people with disabilities.  Ideally such reporting should be aligned with key management meetings.  This should also be communicated within departmental structures.

 

The responsibility for implementing AA needs to be allocated across all levels of management, and the accountability mechanisms for this spelt out in the performance management systems of the department as well as the individual performance agreements of managers.  This will ensure that addressing targets gets the requisite profile and attention.

 

Regular updates on progress with regard to AA be provided to the Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration.

 

Employee profiling is critical, and PERSAL should develop a function to produce these profiles at all levels.

 

The Departments that have not set or do not monitor AA targets should do so.

 

Provision needs to be made in AA plans for conducting AA surveys for the review of management practices, in order to improve communication around AA progress and ensure action thereof.

 

AA targets must be incorporated into performance management systems and an appropriate proportion of the overall score for performing on these levels be agreed upon.  This will influence the seriousness with which it is taken.

 

A protocol should be established whereby Departments can approach either DPSA, DoL or SAMDI as the need arises to provide specific support they may require in implementing AA.

The Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration should play a greater role in holding Executing Authorities accountable for compliance with the affirmative action policy.

 

Implementation

 

It is important that Departments generate, manage and maintain stable, accurate and efficient strategic personnel information that should improve their M & E systems on personnel planning, management and reporting.  It is thus recommended that:

 

Given that Departments experience difficulties in managing data on AA appointments, recruitment and selection which is important in assisting with M & E of AA, this area receives management attention.

 

There needs to be broad support for M & E, and this requires on-going consultation with stakeholders.  This means that consultation should not be viewed as an event, but rather as an on-going process.

 

Given the importance of buy-in to the process at all levels, training on the implementation of AA should be regarded as mandatory across all levels.

 

The institutional arrangements for implementing AA need to be constantly reviewed with a view to changing these as necessary.

 

Departments should develop capabilities to monitor and evaluate their performance on all HR policies, programmes and projects, particularly those of a transformation nature such as affirmative action.

 

There is also a need for the PSC to build a partnership with the Department of Labour to establish an index of affirmative action that will, based on the baseline data reported on in this document, form the basis for forward monitoring and evaluation of affirmative action.

 

Detailed case studies on selected Departments be developed to build knowledge and experience on the implementation of affirmative action and to generate recommendations for improvement to Executing Authorities.

 

 

 

Empowerment

 

This is probably the most critical dimension to AA, as it relates directly to affirmed employees performing effectively.

 

In terms of support, the following is recommended:

 

It must be mandatory that AA criteria are applied to all adverts for new employees. Departments need to go beyond this, especially in the area of disability, by proactively making contact with appropriate organisations and ensuring that they receive adverts.

 

In terms of creating an environment conducive for the employees with disabilities, Departments need to ensure that the work environment is made disability friendly, and the appropriate signage placed.

 

The induction period for new employees needs to be treated with the requisite seriousness from the part of the employees.  The support must go beyond the standardised induction usually offered by Departments.  In each individual case, there needs to be personal development and support plans agreed upon, and monitored.  This will allow for the early identification of integration problems, and allow management to intervene before employees leave out of frustration.

 

In terms of empowerment, Departments need to also offer a service such as career advice and counselling, as it can reasonably be assumed that matters of career pathing, linked to training, will emerge as affirmed employees seek new opportunities. Furthermore, given the new environment, there may be challenges, and support in the form of counselling must be provided.

 

Induction programmes should be strengthened to ensure that they are not just a once-off generic set of activities.

 

Performance discussions need to be held more frequently, and the measurement of work done incrementally.  By doing performance assessments more frequently, there would be more opportunities for feedback, and greater opportunity to identify problems.

 

Affirmed employees, like all others need to be recognised and rewarded, not only through monetary awards but with other innovative ways in which growth and development can be affirmed.

 

General Recommendations on Affirmative Action and Human Resources

 

Departments should address during their HR Planning processes and methods how they will meet affirmative action targets.

Departments should build clear knowledge base and intelligence on key issues such as skill demand and supply factors in the labour market.

Departments should focus more on the advancement of women in senior management and people with disabilities across the board.

Each department should define roles and responsibilities and assign these to a designated official with delegations and performance targets and measures.

The affirmative action roles, responsibilities, powers and functions of central HR units and their head and line managers respectively should be clearly defined and communicated effectively.

The HR function in Departments should be repositioned in a way that creates a balance between their strategic and administrative outlook. This requires that strategic HR competencies such as HR Planning, organisational development, change management, business process improvement, strategic information management and M&E be sourced, harnessed and retained.

 

10.        CONCLUSION

 

The audit has highlighted challenges in the implementation of affirmative action from the three dimensions as outlined in the contextual framework.  Quantitative analysis of affirmative action is conducted to assess progress made in terms of numeric targets and representativity.  Areas of success and challenges in the implementation of affirmative action are indicated based on which recommendations are made.  It is hoped that national and provincial Departments, particularly those whose performance has been identified as requiring improvement will take concerted efforts to implement recommendations contained in this report.