NATIONAL RED / 7th RED SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS.
SUBMISSION BY CENTLEC (PTY) LTD. MUNICIPAL ENTITY (ME) OF MANGAUNG. LOCAL
MUNICIPALITY (MLM).
PRESENTED IN CAPE TOWN JUNE 2006.
Directors:
MB Molemela (Chairperson), AJ Koch (Deputy Chairperson), EV Blekie, Z Majavu,
MB Kabi, ME Ralebese TG Lobe (CEO), L Mashiane (CFO)
NATIONAL RED/ 7th RED SUBMISSIONS AND HEARINGS. SUBMISSION BY
CENTLEC (PTY) LTD. MUNICIPAL ENTITY (ME) OF MANGAUNG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY (MLM)
IN CAPE TOWN JUNE 2006.
1. INTRODUCTION
CENTLEC would like to thank the Portfolio Committee on Minerals and Energy for
inviting CENTLEC as critical stakeholder and an interested party to make a
submission on the viability of the establishment of a National REDI 7th RED.
Ours is to plead our case and possibly that of other Category B municipalities
Umhlathuze, Buffalo City, Southern Cape etc. for consideration as a
transitional mechanism towards the six wall to wall or as an alternative to
National RED where feasible. And in the case of CENTLEC a Local RED proved to
be viable and working effectively.
2. BACKGROUND
First electricity was switched on in Bloemfontein in 1900 with 14 customers.
The supply of electricity under the Bloemfontein Municipality grew to 30 000
customers in 1990. Bloemfontein Electricity embarked on a vigorous
electrification plan and from 1990 to 2005 the number of customers grew to 150
000. With the amalgamation and restructuring of Municipalities, Mangaung Local
Municipality came into being. Mangaung restructured and established CENTLEC PTY
L TO as a ME in 2004 to distribute electricity to Mangaung's six amalgamated
municipalities, and fifteen Southern Free State towns by means of Service Level
Agreements (SDAs). Prior to CENTLEC's incorporation CENTLEC, then Bloemfontein
Electricity (BE), provided services to these Southern Free State Towns enabled
by Local ordinance 8 of 1962section 128. It was only through dedication of all
councilors, board members, management and .employees that CENTLEC became a
world's first class electricity utility.
And this was affirmed by the Business Initiative Directions (BID) and
international body that awarded CENTLEC with the International GOLD Quality
Award, Paris (2005) during it's 22nd International World Quality Commitment
(WQC) Star Award for Excellence and Business Prestige is part of the annual
program of B.I.D. BID Awards are designed to recognize the prestige of the
outstanding companies, organizations, and businessmen in the business world.
We are humbled to bring to the attention of the portfolio committee that once
again CENTLEC will during the 23rd BID International Star Award Celebration be
awarded with a Platinum Award, Geneva (2006).
CENTLEC was created to:
·
Support the National Government drive for Electricity
·
Restructuring Industry's (EDI) restructuring.
·
Demonstrate capacity in our area of jurisdiction and beyond
·
Pave the road for creation of EDI Holdings toolkit and provide learning
for the rest of the Industry.
To date CENTLEC has from humble beginnings, overwhelmed by constrains managed
to create a successful alternative Electricity Distribution Model for South
Africa especially in the rural/ peri-urban areas.
3. OUR UNDERSTANDING OF CABINET's DECISION (14 September 2005 ).
It is CENTLEC's understanding that: (1) Six Metro REDS were expected to be
formed soon after the March 2006 local elections. (2) by no later than 30 March
2006, the final REDs boundaries for selected local municipalities, neighbouring
metropolitan municipalities, including whether they form part of the Metro RED,
the National RED, or if feasible, a separate RED.
COMMENT: CENTLEC is of the view that Category B municipalities should be
allowed to establish LOCAL REDs irrespective of the End-state. Whether the
End-state is six wall to wall or six plus national RED a scope exist for
enhancing municipal capacity through the formation of LOCAL REDS especially in
the Category B municipalities.
CENTLEC's proposition is that the Shareholder/Service Authority and consumers
will benefit - partly from LOCAL RED's scale economies, stronger purchasing
power; reduced fIXed overheads and elimination of roles and facilities to the
benefit of all involved; and lastly proximity which affords LOCAL RED with
excellent customised customer services. NB. It must be noted that in the case
of CENTLEC and the Southern Free State Town this is not a fairy tale or some
academic rhetoric but is in fact a reality-we realised these efficiency gains.
It is our concern that even this public hearings fails to acknowledge that Cabinet's
decision suggested accommodation of LOCAL REDs and not ONLY the National RED as
it will suggest. In CENTLEC's case, and in terms of EDI Holdings Company
criteria-as mandated by cabinet-for a viable LOCAL RED assessment. CENTLEC is
financially viable, is managing the technical networks relatively well, and has
a good revenue base and reasonable proximity.
4. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND/OR CONSIDERATION
An approach of LOCAL REDS can help expedite the realization of global access to
energy, equitable services; completion of Free Basic Electricity rollout; and
rationalisation of tariffs in a particular region. All of these initiatives
could make amalgamation much smoother at a latter stage.
CENTLEC has reached a point where 99,9% of the inhabitants of its licensed area
on proclaimed erven have access to electricity services. CENTLEC has also
embarked on a process of rationalizing tariffs amongst its area of service and
those include Southern Free State Towns. The Areas of the Southern Free State
Towns serviced by CENTLEC residents-especially the impecunious-are benefiting
from government's policy intervention namely the Free Basic Electricity;
contrary to those supplied by Eskom creating a sense of unfair treatment of
customers sometimes only separated by a street. This unequal treatment of
"neighbours" has a potential of destabilising communities through
social unrest.
5. CHALLENGES WITH THE NATIONAL REDS
The key concerns that necessitated a new approach by cabinet decision (14
September 2005) ranged from fiscal and financial risks of transferring Eskom
and Municipalities electricity businesses to the REDs including but not limited
to (i) Financial impact on municipalities and Eskom (ii) Credit rating impact
(iii) Credit control implications (iv) Definition of reticulation to eliminate
possibility of constitutional challenge
CENTLEC VIEW:
Whilst CENTLEC acknowledges the challenges raised by cabinet on the initial
approach, CENTLEC concerns is on the shortcoming of the new approach in
outlining clearly how will the formation of national RED address the concerns
raised by cabinet. Further CENTLEC challenge the intent of limiting Electricity
Distribution restructuring to below 500V, and the voltage limitation to
ultimately define reticulation. The latter has in it the potential to undermine
the comprehensive work of the Electricity Restructuring Blue Print approved by
cabinet in (2001). The well researched blue print recommends that EDI
restructuring will affect the 132KV and below of the electricity sector value
chain.
It is CENTLEC's view that limiting reticulation to below 500V will undermine
the constitutional right of municipalities reticulate electricity in their
areas of jurisdiction. Is it correct for us to say should Eskom had been
willing to let go of the Electricity Distribution component of its business we
will not be in a position were we have to "redefine" the Distribution
business directly or indirectly?
In general municipalities-and ours in particular-are not in support of Eskom
due to big brother treatment in past. The fact that electricity reticulation is
not a core business of Eskom adds to the concern of not only CENTLEC but the
whole industry. It is also true that impact of staff transfer is not yet
understood fully i.e. in terms of pension funds, parity on remuneration; tax
implications and network control. Of concern is the manner in which the
modeling was conducted. For example consultation was not very inclusive and
hence to date only one section-viz. Eskom-of the industry have been fully
consulted on the modeling of the National RED.
Lastly, CENTLEC is of the view that, there are some policy decision that must
precede the decision around the National RED and those relate to whether the
National RED will be a ME or a Public Entity (PE) and shareholding/ownership in
general. Two, the decision on whether compensation will be effected and if so
the principles that will govern that process. Also the asset evaluation method
to be adopted is of high importance.
CENTLEC also took note that, the original Sep 05 decision made provision for
local RED.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Allow for roll-out LOCAL REDS where feasible
2. Financial assistance to be provided for smaller municipalities when it comes
to S78 of MSA or alternatively provide an alternative mechanism be it in a form
of exemption from other processes.
3. The process of tariff rationalisation to be definite in terms of time frame
and empowered by legislative mechanisms e.g. NERSA tariff processes.
4. In order to ensure a unified service delivery in localities, that Eskom hand
over the customers and Assets to LOCAL REDS-especially residential and
commercial-as was the case in Cape Town. Such a move
would expedite the FBE roll-out and electrification.
5. Conduct a detailed study on the tax implications on surplus revenue by a
municipal entity and tax exemption where possible.