Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts on Study
Tour to Mozambique, dated 8 November 2005:
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts, having undertaken a study
tour to Mozambique from 31 July – 03 August 2005, reports as follows:
1. Introduction
The Standing Committee on Public Accounts undertook a study tour to the
Mozambican Parliament. The purpose of the study tour was to obtain insight into the
procedural operations of the Public Accounts committee and the Finance committee
in the execution of their oversight of public finance management.
It was also the Committees intention to gain an understanding of the audit process
followed in Mozambique. In the Committees interaction the Committee sought to
determine the style, approach and methodology of their engagement with the
executive, their system of dealing with and prioritization of audit reports and their
progress in performance auditing.
The interaction allowed the delegation to gain first hand knowledge of the
management and conduct of the Public Accounts Committee in the handling of their
general state of accounts and its interaction with other relevant committees and
stakeholders such as the Administrative Tribunal, assigned with auditing functions.
Furthermore, the committee sought to establish links with Mozambican public
representatives and institutions at national level.
2. Delegation
The Delegation consisted of the following members:
African National Congress
Dr G Koornhof
Mr D Gumede
Ms L Mabe
Mr R Mofokeng
Ms L Mashiane
Democratic Alliance
Ms A Dreyer
United Democratic Movement
Mr G Madikiza
United Christian Democratic Movement
Mr B Pule
Committee Secretary accompanying the Delegation
Mr G Dixon
Office of the Auditor-General
Ms N Hlasa
Ms Z Keto
3. Courtesy visit to the SA High Commission in Mozambique
The delegation paid a courtesy visit to the South African High Commissioner, Ms
Thandi Lujabe Rankoe, who briefed the Committee on South African / Mozambican
relations and Bi-lateral Agreements between the two countries. The report, attached
as Annexure A, is included for the record.
The First Secretary Consular, Ms NC Nyamande, briefed the committee on labour
movements between the two countries, including visa control and border post
detention centres.
Amongst the issues highlighted were:
A. Deportation problems such as the unavailability of funds to assist people
awaiting deportation. (e.g accommodation, food, medication)
B. Difficulty with regard to the verification of SA Citizens, due to the fact that
they enter Mozambique without the proper documentation.
(Please see the attached report for further information)
4. Meeting with the Planning and Budget Committee Chairperson in the Mozambique
Parliament
The Mozambican Parliament was in recess at the time of the visit and the
Chairperson, Mrs Virginia Verdeia, kindly took time out of her constituency work to
assist the delegation. The Mozambican Parliament sits for 90 days per year. The 1st
Semester is from 01 March to 10 May. The recess is until 15 October. The second
semester is from mid-October to the first week in December.
The Mozambican Parliament is composed of eight specialized commissions. They
are:
i. Planning and Budget
ii. Social Affairs, Gender and Environment
iii. Economic Activities and Services
iv. Defence and Public Order
v. Agriculture, Regional Development, Public Administration and
Local Government
vi. Internal Relations
vii. Legal Affairs and Human Rights
viii. Petitions
The Planning and Budget Committee was the closest committee that fit the
description of a public accounts committee in Mozambique.
The majority party, FRELIMO, chairs the Planning and Budget Committee. Ten
FRELIMO members and five members of the RENAMO Electoral Union
proportionally represent the Committees membership.
The oversight role of the Planning and Budget Committee is more in line with South
Africa’s Joint Budget Committee, than the South African system of SCOPA and
Auditor-General. The Mozambican system uses the Planning and Budget committee
to oversee the approval of the Budget and the Judiciary body known as the
Administrative Tribunal to investigate the financial statements submitted by
government departments.
3.1 Planning and Budget Committee’s Oversight Role
The Ministry of Finance prepares a budget proposal known as the Plano Economico
e Social (PES), the English translation is the "Economic and Social Plan", by the end
of September of each year and tables this state budget to Parliament. This budget
proposal is debated and approved by Parliament during its second session from
October to December.
During the budget drafting process, before September, the Planning and Budgeting
Committee conducts oversight visits of the various Provinces during the constituency
period. Their focus is to evaluate the execution of the first semester’s budget.
Provinces discuss with the Planning and Budget Committee proposals they have for
the new budget, problems that they have experienced and issues that need
addressing. This preparatory work allows this committee to analyse the budget
proposal submitted by the Ministry of Finance at the end of September. During this
period of oversight visits, the other committees in Parliament conduct similar visits
in order to address the budget proposals in their areas of competence.
During the second semester deliberations, from October to December, the Planning
and Budget Committee can call Ministers to discuss the proposals made. Each
Committee, including the Planning and Budget Committee, will revise the proposal
in its respective area. The reports on the budget proposal are tabled and discussed in
the plenary session of Parliament.
It must be noted that the Planning and Budget Committee does not interrogate each
department’s audited financial statements or accounts. According to law, a court of
law known as the Administrative Tribunal performs this function. The Planning and
Budgeting Committees main focus is the global picture of the general state of the
accounts, produced by the Ministry of Finance.
5. The Administrative Tribunal and the Oversight of Financial Management
The Administrative Tribunal is a judicial body that has the responsibility of auditing
the financial institutions. Its function is equivalent to that of the Auditor-General of
South Africa but it plays a further multi-functionary role in the oversight of public
finances.
The Administrative Tribunal inter alia focuses on the following issues with regard to
public finances:
- It performs the audits of the financial statements
- It interrogates the audited financial statements
- It administers government contracts
4.1 Auditing of financial statements
There are three types of audits:
- Prior inspections
- Audits of departments
- General account
4.2 Prior inspections
The Administrative Tribunal reviews the governments contract proposals for a
specific activity. Procurement contracts are assessed according to legislation and
compliance with regulations. The Administrative Tribunal also expresses an opinion
on the necessity of the specific activity.
4.3 Audits of departments
Each state institution prepares its financial statements, which are accounts on the
execution of the budget. These financial statements are sent to the Administrative
Tribunal which interrogates the statements and expresses an opinion on them.
The Administrative Tribunal possesses the required skills level to assess the accounts
and is tasked with this process by law. After the review, the Administrative Tribunal
has the power to investigate and report financial misconduct and can impose
sanctions and mete out punishment to offending officials. The legal experts follow up
on the legal and financial sanctions that should be taken. There are three sanctions
applicable: - Disciplinary procedures
- Criminal procedures
- Financial procedures
The ability to impose criminal and financial sanctions is considered a strength of the
system. The Administrative Tribunal works hand in hand with other judiciary bodies
to investigate the person/s responsible for mismanagement and to determine the
applicable charge. Disciplinary procedures are left to the Ministry of Finance to
implement.
4.4 General Account
The General Account is prepared by the Minister of Finance and is sent to the
Administrative Tribunal. The Administrative Tribunal prepares a report or opinion
on the General Account. The Administrative Tribunal has no decision-making
powers in regard to the General Account but expresses an opinion and tables it to
Parliament.
The National Treasury Directorate in the Ministry of Finance assesses the review.
The Ministry of Finance uses the information in preparation for the tabling of the
report to Parliament.
The Administrative Tribunal’s involvement in this process is similar to the Auditor-
General of South Africa’s external audit of accounts. The Ministry of Finance’s
report is referee to the Planning and Budget Committee. The Administrative
Tribunal strongly criticizes the administration of the state accounts and the Planning
and Budget committee often has to call both the Administrative Tribunal and
Ministry of Finance to investigate the difference of opinion. The Planning and
Budget committee has the final opinion with regard to the general account.
6. Ministry of State Administration
The Ministry of State Administration was established in 1995. Its function is to
control the activities of the Ministries particularly in terms of local municipalities.
Initially it did not have enough staff to carry out its functions effectively. The
Ministry of State Administration was re-organized and in 2004 its complement was
increased to effectively carry out its mandate.
Its investigations reveal that there was a relaxed attitude to the adherence to rules and
regulations pertaining to the budget and human resources. In several instances the
departments and institutions did not follow rules or know that these rules existed.
The Ministry of State Administration now has inspectorate teams carrying out
inspections on two provinces per month. In addition each Ministry carries out sector
specific inspections such as in labour, health, education, etc.
The Ministry of State Administration is presently revising the concept of inspections.
The issue is whether to specialize on specific portfolios or do inspections on a global
scale with regard to the legal framework applicable for financial management,
human resources and implementation of ministerial policy
7. Portfolio Committee on Agriculture, Administration and Local Government
The Committee is composed of 15 MPs proportionally represented by ten FRELIMO
and five RENAMO Electoral Union members. The committee is divided into three
sub-groups composed of:
- Agriculture
- Regional development
- Public administration and local government
The committee’s involvement in the budget process is to conduct visits to institutions
and investigate their plans for the budget. The committee conducts oversight visits
to determine the extent of work already carried out. The committee reports and
expresses an opinion on those observations.
8. MINISTRY OF FINANCE
ORGANIZATION OF THE MINISTRY
The Permanent Secretary is a recent appointment. The Prime Minister based on the
Minister’s proposals appoints the Permanent Secretary. The appointee fulfills the
role of technical and administrative functions and works with the Minister.
7.1 National Directorates
Planning and Budgeting: Preparation of budget
Public Accounts: Follow-up execution of budget and prepares a quarterly report. At
the end of the year the Permanent Secretary prepares the General Account.
NATIONAL TREASURY:
i. Financial planning
ii. Make payments
iii. 3 months financial report
iv. Management of debt
v. Responsible for international relations
vi. Oversee Public Enterprises
vii. Central Bank
The Ministry also has a General Directorate of finances that acts as the internal audit
body.
9. Conclusion
The Administrative Tribunal’s role has a number of advantages in terms of oversight.
It is equipped with the legal framework to assess the financial statements, investigate
maladministration and prosecute offenders. It gives the exercise of overseeing the
expenditure of public finances the power to enforce its findings and resolutions.
The Auditor-General system and the court system have strengths and weaknesses
that should be discussed. The major shortcoming of the court system is that there is a
PLANNING AND BUDGETING PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
TREASURY ASSETS OF STATE
INSPECTORATE OF FINANCES
NATIONAL DIRECTORATE
PERMANENT SECRETARY
DEPUTY MINISTER
(Non. presently appointed
MINISTER
(Political authority: Snr Admin power
distance between the interaction of the Planning and Budget committee and the
Administrative Tribunal.
The Planning and Budget Committee proposed further interaction with SCOPA at the
Southern African Development Community Organisation of Public Accounts
Committees (SADCOPAC) level. It is in favour of brainstorming the most suitable
system for oversight of public finances in Southern Africa.
Thanks and appreciation
In most instances the Committee achieved the purpose of the tour by obtaining
comparative insight into the operations, procedure and methodology of the Public
Accounts, Audit and Finance Committees in the execution of the oversight and
monitoring of public finance management. The interaction with the Planning and
Budget committee was fruitful and we established favourable links with the members
of the committee.
One of the challenges the delegation had to face related to the apparent differences
between the Portuguese system and the Westminster system of government. The
interaction was often disjointed and common ground had to be established before a
fruitful discussion could commence. The language barrier posed another challenge,
however, the translator provided by the South African High Commission was of
tremendous help in regard to understanding the concepts used in Mozambique.
The Committee extends its thanks and appreciation to the Mozambique Chairpersons
of the Planning and Budget committee, the Portfolio Committee on Agriculture,
Administration and Local power, the National Treasury, the Ministry of Public
Administration for affording the Committee the time out of its busy schedules. The
Committee further acknowledges the invaluable assistance rendered by the High
Commission to the success of the tour.
The initial study tour proposal included a visit to the Kenyan Government. Due to the
Kenyan Parliamentary recess, this leg is postponed until further notice.
Report to be considered.".