Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts - Independent
Development Trust (IDT), dated 6 April 2005:
INTRODUCTION
The
Standing Committee on Public Accounts, having considered the Annual Report and
the Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the
Independent Development Trust for the year ended 31 March 2004, tabled in
Parliament on 22 September 2004 and referred to it, reports as follows:
1. AUDIT OPINION
The
Committee noted the unqualified audit opinion expressed by the Auditor-General,
and trusts that future audit opinions shall be equally unqualified.
The
Committee also noted with concern the following:
·
non-compliance
with PFMA in respect of section 51(1)(A & C);
·
internal
control weaknesses; and
·
irregularities
pertaining to the payroll function (an investigation is in progress).
The
Committee recommends that it should be updated with the outcome of the
investigation and expects the accounting authority to expeditiously rectify the
issues in question.
2. CONCLUSION
The
Committee is of the view that, except for the aspects highlighted above, no
further interaction with the accounting authority of the IDT is necessary for
the financial year under review.
The
Committee therefore awaits the next Annual Report and the Report of the
Auditor-General.
Report to be
considered.
==
Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts - National
Lotteries Board, dated 6 April 2005:
INTRODUCTION
The Standing
Committee on Public Accounts, having considered the Annual Report and the
Report of the Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the Board for the
year ended 31 March 2004, tabled in Parliament on 22 September 2004
and referred to it, reports as follows:
1.
AUDIT OPINION
The Committee
noted the unqualified audit opinion expressed by the Auditor-General, and
trusts that future audit opinions shall be equally unqualified.
2.
GENERAL MATTERS:
The Committee
also noted with disappointment that:
3.
RECOMMENDATION
The Committee
recommends that the Board report to Parliament within two weeks after the
receipt of the resolution:
4.
CONCLUSION
The Committee is
of the view that except for the aspect highlighted above; no further
interaction with the Board would be necessary for the financial year under
review.
The Committee
therefore awaits the next Annual Report and the Report of the Auditor-General.
Report to be
considered.
==
Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts – Department of
Public Works, dated 6 April 2005:
INTRODUCTION
The Standing
Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA), having considered the Report of the
Auditor-General on the Financial Statements of the Department of Public Works
(DPW) for the year ended 31 March 2003 and 2004, reports as follows:
1. General observations, including
previous SCOPA recommendations
Background: The Auditor-General reported that
progress had been made in respect of eight of the fourteen recommendations made
by SCOPA in its 112th Report for 2003. However, to date no formal response to the
recommendations as adopted by the House has been provided to Parliament.
SCOPA
hearing: During the
hearing, the Committee probed the four matters that remain unresolved, as well
as various other matters and where appropriate, made recommendations for the
House to consider.
The Committee
wishes to commend the Accounting Officer for the progress made in a number of
areas. However, the Committee is disappointed that certain matters remain unresolved,
especially the completeness and accuracy of the state-owned property register.
The Committee also wishes to express concern about the new matters dealt with
during the hearing, especially the high number of vacant positions within the
Department of Public Works.
Recommendation:
The Committee recommends that Parliament ensure that the recommendations
contained in this Report, once adopted by the House, are transmitted to the
relevant executive authority for response by the Department of Public Works.
2.
Debtors
Background: The following
weaknesses were reported regarding rental debtors:
·
The debtor sub-system (Property Management Information System or PMIS) is not fully
utilised;
·
No interest is charged on outstanding amounts, and
monthly invoicing and submission of statements to debtors are not being done;
·
Receipts are not captured on the debtors subsystem;
and
·
No debtors’ age analyses are made available for
management purposes.
SCOPA
hearing: The
Accounting Officer reported to the Committee that a number of corrective steps
had been implemented. This included the
establishment of property management units, and implementing best practice
standard lease agreements with client departments. Lease agreements now include
an interest clause that did not previously exist. An age analysis module has
also been incorporated into the PMIS and the information generated is discussed
at management meetings.
Recommendations: The Committee recommends that:
2.1
The debtor system at the Department should be
evaluated by the IT Section to determine whether the current system complies
with all the needs of the DPW; and
2.2
Progress made regarding
the weaknesses of the debtor system should be reported, on a quarterly basis to
the Audit Committee of the DPW, who should monitor and evaluate the progress in
order to report thereon in the next annual report of the Department.
3. Revenue
Background: In terms of Section 38 (1) (c) of the Public Finance
and Management Act (PFMA) an accounting officer must take effective and
appropriate steps to collect all money due to the Department. The controls over rental revenue were
reported to be ineffective. A lack of training of officials was also reported.
An investigation into married and single quarter official housing highlighted
that tariffs were last updated in 1995. In terms of Treasury Regulation 7.3.1
the accounting officer must at least annually review these tariffs if they are
under his or her control.
SCOPA hearing: The Committee was informed that an annual review of
the tariffs for official housing had not been carried out in about nine years.
The Accounting Officer indicated that the tariffs were part of public service
central bargaining chamber negotiations on service conditions, and that the Department of Public Works had little choice
but to implement the bargaining chamber agreements. It was further argued that the loss to the
State owing to lower than market related rental should not be regarded as a
loss, seeing that it is part of service conditions of essential services.
Recommendation:
The Committee
recommends that this matter be taken up by the Accounting Officer with the Department
of Public Service and Administration as a matter of urgency and reported on to
Parliament by the end of the current financial year as the Committee is
convinced that the position with regard to official housing could be better
managed.
4.
Asset management
Background: The
fixed asset register for moveable assets was incomplete. This was due to the
implementation of a computer software program started in the previous year
aimed at maintaining a register of item identification codes and locations.
In addition, a
"proof on concept" on the requirements for a complete, valid and
accurate national fixed property register to meet accounting disclosure
requirements still has to be developed. An evaluation by the Auditor-General of
the proof of concept revealed that:
SCOPA
hearing: The Accounting Officer indicated that progress was
made with respect to the database in question. He also indicated that the
information system was intended to also produce useful management information.
However, he pointed out that the Department of Land Affairs was responsible for
the overall inventory of land, and that the Department of Public Works register
was only part of such a bigger inventory.
Regarding
confirmation of ownership, this was a Land Affairs project for which funding
seemed imminent. The Department of
Public Works would participate in such a project and would utilise information
resulting from such a project for purposes of a fixed property register.
Indications were
that a project to ensure a proper valuation model would require about
R250 million over approximately five years. Funding was being discussed
with National Treasury. The Department
of Public Works was considering various options, including obtained
international advice. However, SCOPA observed that the action plan seemed
weak. It was also noted that it might
lead to a qualified audit opinion in future years if not addressed sooner than
five years.
Recommendations:
The Committee
recommends that:
4.1 The Accounting Officer urgently attend to
the finalisation of a valuation model.
4.2 An action plan should be tabled at the next
meeting of the Department's Audit Committee for review and comment to the
Accounting Officer and the Minister.
The Committee should report thereon
in the next annual report of the Department.
5. General and application controls -
computer environment
Background: A
general control review by the Auditor-General identified certain significant
system control weaknesses, including the absence of a disaster recovery plan.
SCOPA
hearing: The Committee was informed that a proper disaster
recovery plan was being finalised coupled with related improvements such as a
service level agreement between the IT division and the departmental users.
Recommendation:
The Committee recommends that:
5.1
The
Accounting Officer ensure the urgent finalisation of a proper disaster recovery
plan;
5.2
The
Audit Committee evaluate the adequacy thereof and report thereon in the next
annual report of the Department; and
5.3
The
Accounting Officer and Audit Committee review the relevance of the last risk
assessment exercise, as well as the adequacy of the current risk management
strategy, and report thereon in the next Annual Report.
6. Property Management Information
System (PMIS)
Background:
An information system audit of the application controls within the PMIS,
conducted by the Auditor-General, found that although some controls were in
place, significant weaknesses existed in the general control environment as a
whole.
SCOPA
hearing: The Chief Information Officer indicated in
her comments that various corrective measures have been taken or envisaged.
Recommendation: The Committee recommends that:
6.1
The
Audit Committee evaluate the adequacy of corrective steps implemented, and
report thereon in the next annual report of the Department.
6.2
The
Accounting Officer and the Executive Authority take cognisance that the
responsibility for implementing basic controls such as these was the obligation
of all accounting officers in terms of section 38 of the Public Finance
Management Act, and that failure to effectively implement such controls constitutes
financial misconduct.
7. Vacancies and Skills development
Background:
The Auditor-General indicated that a lack of management reviews seemed a
likely underlying cause for financial management weaknesses.
SCOPA
hearing: The Accounting Officer maintained that the
Department of Public Works was a highly technical department with core
functions for which it was not always easy to procure the required staff. In
spite of this, the Department of Public Works had recently managed to fill over
300 posts at highly skilled supervisory level and at middle management level. In
addition, an extensive recruitment drive will continue.
Recommendation: The Committee recommends that:
7.1
In view of the incorrect information contained on page
90 of the Annual Report, the Accounting Officer provides SCOPA and the
Portfolio Committee on Public Works with a correct and updated skills
development plan; and
7.2
The Portfolio Committee on Public Works monitor
progress with the filling of all vacancies, especially financially related
vacancies, and specifically the critical top management positions such as the
Deputy Director General: Extended Public Works Programme.
8. Unauthorised expenditure
Background: The appropriation statement reflects
overspending of R30,360 million on one main division, which is also disclosed
as unauthorised expenditure in Note 12 to the financial statements. In the previous
financial year, unauthorised expenditure amounted to R227,088 million.
SCOPA
hearing : The Department of Public Works argued that it was obligated to honour
all rental contracts, even though adequate funds were not provided for in the
annual national budget. The same applied
to property rates and taxes. The
Department of Public Works argued that both these categories constituted
unavoidable expenditure. The DPW admitted, however, that the quality of its
motivations to National Treasury could improve.
However National
Treasury disputed this and attributed it to inefficient planning and lack of
expenditure reprioritisation.
The Committee
further noted that the disclosure of information in the notes to the annual
financial statements seemed inadequate, as no information was provided on the
appropriateness or otherwise of disciplinary steps against relevant officials,
or of other processes that have been instituted.
Recommendations:
The Committee recommends that -
2.3
The Accounting
Officer, in future ensures –
(a)
Better quality budget submissions to National
Treasury; and
(b)
Pro-active budgetary management as provided for in the
PFMA to avoid over-expenditure.
9. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure
Background:
The notes to the annual financial statements (note 12.4, page 65)
disclosed an amount of R167, 000 in respect of fruitless expenditure, which
declined from R16,547 million in the previous financial year.
SCOPA
hearing: The Accounting Officer indicated that the Department of Public Works
educating user-departments on the consequences of vacating buildings before the
expiry of a rental contract. A system of user charges will be introduced in
about two years and will force user departments to budget for rental charges.
Recommendation:
The Committee
wishes to commend the Department of Public Works on the decline in the total
amount of fruitless expenditure.
The Committee
recommends, however, that:
9.1
The
Department of Public Works ensure that all user-departments are contractually
bound to carry the cost of any fruitless expenditure arising from early
vacating of rented properties; and
9.2
The
Department expedites the implementation of user charges.
10. Account balances
Background: The following items, which originate
from prior to 2002 remain unresolved due to a lack of supporting documentation:
The Department of
Public Works has reportedly met with the Accountant-General and presented
information supporting the write-off of these transactions. At the time of the
publication of the Annual Report, finality on the possible write-off of these
amounts was still outstanding.
The resolution of
irreconcilable debts and debt inherited from regional structures is currently
being addressed as a government wide initiative with all relevant stakeholders.
The DPW has disclosed the various items in notes 11.2 and 11.3 to the financial
statements.
SCOPA hearing: The Accounting Officer assured the Committee
that in future, no documents will be destroyed before a period of five years or
before audits have been completed. He
argued that the pre-2002 situation was a historic situation beyond the control
of the Department of Public
Works,
and that he believed that the amounts should be written off.
The Auditor-General indicated that a prerequisite for the write-off of
the amounts in question, was that proof would have to be provided that
sufficient attempts were made to either recover the amounts, or retrieve the
relevant documentation. The department
would also have to have a surplus from which such amount can be written off
against.
National Treasury indicated that it required a consolidated figure of
all departments, which were in a similar position, before the National Treasury
could consider approving the write-off.
Recommendations:
10.1
The Committee recommends that National Treasury
consult all national departments who were in the same position, and clearly
indicate what is required for this long outstanding matter to be resolved; and
10.2
The Department
of Public Works continues its discussions with the Accountant-General in order to
determine what more is required to resolve this matter.
11. Financial Management
Background: There is a
reported lack of independent
checks and management reviews within the Department of Public Works resulting
in policies and procedures as implemented by management not being fully adhered
to.
In its 112th
Report of last year, the Committee noted the lack of capacity within the
internal audit unit within
the Department of Public Works, and the Committee recommended that the Accounting
Officer considers outsourcing part of the internal audit function.
SCOPA hearing: The
Accounting Officer indicated that management reviews had to be addressed by
recruiting the right quality and number of skilled staff.
Regarding
internal audit, Department of Public Works contracted in a consortium of
private audit firms to assist with the internal audit function during the
2003-2004 financial year. The capacity in the internal audit has also been
expanded at regional level. However, the training and skills transferring was
raised as a matter of concern even at Audit Committee level. The Accounting
Officer assured the Committee that measures were taken to ensure that training
and proper skills transfer take place.
Recommendations:
Having considered the evidence and steps taken by the Accounting Officer
to ensure that all weaknesses as indicated by the Auditor-General were addressed,
the Committee recommends that:
11.1
A
target date be set for the total independent functioning of the internal audit
section throughout the Department;
11.2
The Audit Committee should assess the feasibility of
the target date, and monitor progress towards the final date agreed between the
Audit Committee and the Accounting Officer; and
11.3
The Audit Committee monitors management responses to
the weaknesses reported in the audit management letters of the Auditor-General.
12. The reconciliation of the PMIS to BAS
Background: In SCOPA’s 112th Report of
2003, the Committee recommended that:
·
The
Department of Public Works should perform regular reconciliation's (i.e.
monthly) that will be reviewed by the Director-General on a quarterly basis;
and
·
Monitoring
mechanisms should be in place to ensure proper reconciliation.
During the
2003-2004 audit, the Auditor-General Office brought to the attention of the DPW
the fact that reconciliation between PMIS and BAS was only carried out annually
and not on a monthly basis.
SCOPA
hearing: The Accounting Officer provided assurance to
the Committee that reconciliations between PMIS and BAS were now being done on
a monthly basis.
Recommendation: The Committee
recommends that the Audit Committee review the adequacy of the monthly and
quarterly reconciliations, and report thereon in the Annual Report for
2004-2005.
Report to be
considered.