PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

REVENUE LAWS: AMENDMENT BILL, 2005

REPRESENTATIONS AND COMMENTS TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE


Thursday, 20 October 2005

PricewaterhouseCoopers representations Overall impressions

· Well put together bill, with majority of measures introduced understandable, justified and welcomed;

· As with last year's, regarded as a welcome consolidation after recent years' introducing new concepts;

· Timing less strained than in previous years;

· Remains a, not unexpected, different emphasis from taxpayer side

· Effective dates


PricewaterhouseCoopers representations Key topics to be covered


PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations Corporate reorganisations

· Effective date for reduction in 70% common ownership requirement in "group of companies" definition [clause 8];

· The DFIHC and FFIHC rules;

- Break even assets [clause 41(c) & (d)]

- FFIHC - companies dealing in multiple territories [clause 41(d)]

· Double capture of capital distributions in group transactions [clause 41(h)];

· Permitted transfers of shares within a group [clause 45(d)];

· Multiple application of FIHC tests in unbundling transactions [clause 46(g)];

· Criteria for unbundling relief.


PricewaterhouseCoopers representations International issues

· Recognition (partial) re IP as "not bad" [clause 16(m)]

· Extension of definition of CFC [clause 16(1 )(a) & (e)] and retrospectivity [clause 16(2)];

· Undesirable CFC exit charges [clauses 78 and 89];

- Illustrative example

- Conflict within legislation

- Policy not notified

- Tax at greater than effective rates

- Double taxation

- Internationally uncompetitive (see comparative table)

- Interpretative position and need for certainty

PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations International issues-CFC exit charge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where SA disposes of CFC1;


Following gains also sought to be taxed;

PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations International issues-CFC exit charge

Country

Imputation of CFC's actual gains?

Deemed disposal by CFC on ceasing to be CFC?

Participation Exemption/ other relief on sale CFC?

SA

Yes

Yes?

Yes- para 64B

UK

No

No

Yes-SSE

US

Yes

No

No

Australia

Yes

No

Yes

Canada

Potential partial

Yes (but surplus rules)

Yes (surplus rules)

NZ

N/A - no CGT

N/A - no CGT

N/A - no CGT

PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations CGT

Non-residents - mining rights [Clauses 15(b) and 75]

· Non-residents subject to SA CGT on disposals of SA immovable property or interests therein;

· Interests include companies where >80% of value is attributable to SA immovable property

· Exclusion of assets held as trading stock for these purposes;

· Request that mining rights (though capital assets) be treated as trading for purposes of this test;

Loan waivers [clause 78(c)]

· Limited to connected parties

PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations STC

· Move to "directly or indirectly"

- Administrative and tracking issues

· Change in terminology - "earned" to "arose"

 

 

In

PricewaterhouseCoopers

3;A

· Apparent anomaly between income tax exemption and CGT pick-up

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ii

PricewaterhouseCoopers