PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS
REVENUE LAWS: AMENDMENT BILL, 2005
REPRESENTATIONS AND COMMENTS TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE
Thursday, 20 October 2005
PricewaterhouseCoopers representations Overall impressions
· Well put together bill, with majority of measures introduced understandable, justified and welcomed;
· As with last year's, regarded as a welcome consolidation after recent years' introducing new concepts;
· Timing less strained than in previous years;
· Remains a, not unexpected, different emphasis from taxpayer side
· Effective dates
PricewaterhouseCoopers representations Key topics to be covered
PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations Corporate reorganisations
· Effective date for reduction in 70% common ownership requirement in "group of companies" definition [clause 8];
· The DFIHC and FFIHC rules;
- Break even assets [clause 41(c) & (d)]
- FFIHC - companies dealing in multiple territories [clause 41(d)]
· Double capture of capital distributions in group transactions [clause 41(h)];
· Permitted transfers of shares within a group [clause 45(d)];
· Multiple application of FIHC tests in unbundling transactions [clause 46(g)];
· Criteria for unbundling relief.
PricewaterhouseCoopers representations International issues
· Recognition (partial) re IP as "not bad" [clause 16(m)]
· Extension of definition of CFC [clause 16(1 )(a) & (e)] and retrospectivity [clause 16(2)];
· Undesirable CFC exit charges [clauses 78 and 89];
- Illustrative example
- Conflict within legislation
- Policy not notified
- Tax at greater than effective rates
- Double taxation
- Internationally uncompetitive (see comparative table)
- Interpretative position and need for certainty
PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations International issues-CFC exit charge
Where SA disposes of CFC1;
Following gains also sought to be taxed;
PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations International issues-CFC exit charge
Country |
Imputation of CFC's actual gains? |
Deemed disposal by CFC on ceasing to be CFC? |
Participation Exemption/ other relief on sale CFC? |
SA |
Yes |
Yes? |
Yes- para 64B |
UK |
No |
No |
Yes-SSE |
US |
Yes |
No |
No |
Australia |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Canada |
Potential partial |
Yes (but surplus rules) |
Yes (surplus rules) |
NZ |
N/A - no CGT |
N/A - no CGT |
N/A - no CGT |
PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations CGT
Non-residents - mining rights [Clauses 15(b) and 75]
· Non-residents subject to SA CGT on disposals of SA immovable property or interests therein;
· Interests include companies where >80% of value is attributable to SA immovable property
· Exclusion of assets held as trading stock for these purposes;
· Request that mining rights (though capital assets) be treated as trading for purposes of this test;
Loan waivers [clause 78(c)]
· Limited to connected parties
PricewaterhouseCoopers represantations STC
· Move to "directly or indirectly"
- Administrative and tracking issues
· Change in terminology - "earned" to "arose"
In
PricewaterhouseCoopers
3;A
· Apparent anomaly between income tax exemption and CGT pick-up
ii
PricewaterhouseCoopers