Responses to comments on Credit Bill, 2005
Section |
Comment |
Consideration |
Recommendation |
|
Remove reference to Civil Court and change it to refer to all courts |
Omit "civil" from definition |
|
|
The points made about the definition of credit are accepted. It is therefore necessary to consider changing the term credit union and reference to services provided by bank. |
Change "credit union" to "credit co-operative" and change the wording in the following manner: credit co-operative whose predominant purpose is to offer financial services to its members." |
|
|
The concern that a loophole is created for potential abuse of consumers is shared. However, it is not realistic to say that if State where to provide, it would certainly take time to implement. However , there may be real emergencies in the interim. Rather than delegating this definition and the relevant section(s78) we may need to consider tightening up this area. In particular ,it should not be possible for credit providers to do emergency lender should be able to grant such credit only under exceptional circumstances. The National Credit Regulator should be able to investigate as well. |
Definition to be tightened up by limiting its application only to the consumer, a dependent and a person the consumer is financially responsible for. Also, remove reference to "any other unanticipated life event" |
|
|
Definition requires review to ensure that it is consistent with prepaid transaction and intention |
Definition to be reviewed – to revert to committee |
|
in Bill |
|||
|
Accepted |
Omit" 34( 1)" and substitute with "259(1)(a) |
|
|
Accepted |
Insert into the definition of 'instalment agreement', a clause like (c) in "lease". |
|
|
Comments noted and specific insertion proposed |
Insert "other than stokvels and co-operatives" after "unincorporated" |
|
|
Accepted |
Replace 13(1) a with 13(a) |
|
|
Agree. Need to redefine to ensure that mortgage' refer to the security interest registered in fixed property (or something of this sort) and define the credit agreement as the agreement that is secured through mortgage. |
Amend as follows: "mortgage" is a pledge of immovable property which secures obligations under a mortgage agreement"; mortgage agreement" is a credit agreement secured by a pledge of immovable property". |
|
|
The need for this definition must be reviewed, as section 127 deals with instalment agreements. It is not clear that any non-returnable goods would be sold under instalment agreement and this would in fact not be proper, as the good taken as security then has no intrinsic value |
Delete definition and other references to "non-returnable goods" |
|
|
Agree that there is an anomaly here and require clarification |
Delete (a) in the definition of prepaid transaction; replace use of" prepaid transaction" with" incidental credit" in other sections of the Bill, where relevant |
|
|
Implication of current wording is that the prohibition of 'door-to-door' sales of credit may not apply if part of the house is used for business purposes |
Add "or principally" after 'wholly' (will be consistent with Human Rights Commission Act). |
|
|
Correct |
Replace "small with "short"; |
|
|
Change definition of "statutory exception" |
Change reference to "developmental credit" to "a developmental credit agreement" in definition of "statutory exception" and in all other sections of the Bill where the term "developmental credit" is used |
|
2 |
|
Does not appear that any change to 116 is required as 2(3) accommodates electronic signature in any case where this Act refers to a document being signed. Furthermore, 52(3) is seeking to accommodate both possibilities, signature in conformation of the ECT Act, as well as other cases [3(a) & 3(b)]. |
Section re-organised to make clear that there are two types of signatures, which are provided for in the ECT Act and which have different rules applied to them an advanced electronic signature and electronic signature |
4(1) |
|
Consider Suggest that we expand the definition to include the holding company of the juristic person. Note that this would have the effect that an SME where a corporate has a controlling shareholding in, is also excluded. |
Delete words "or having an effect within," from section 4(1) Insert "of this consumer or any other juristic person of which it is a subsidiary" after turnover" in 4(1b) |
4(6) |
|
The sentence means: "If a consumer pays for goods or services with a credit card or other credit facility, the seller of the goods is not necessary assumed to be a credit provider." |
Section to be rephrased as follows: "For all purposes in this Act , if a consumer pays for goods or services by way of a charge against a credit facility in terms of which a third party is the credit provider , the person who sells the goods or services is not regarded to have entered into a credit agreement with the consumer merely by virtue of that fact;" |
5 |
|
Agree that section is confusing at present. Need to be rephrased |
Section rephrased to make clear which sections of the Act apply to incidental credit. Have excluded requirement to be registered on NCR. Also provided that incidental credit agreements may only include interest and are subject to maximum |
8(2) |
|
Loans against insurance policies should be included. But we can exempt loans extended to maintain the premium payments |
Review section 8(2)(&) as follows "a policy of insurance, and credit extended by the insurer, but only to the extent that the credit is utilised to maintain the payment of premiums on such a policy" |
11(1) |
|
Nothing to do with retrospectively. Allows the Minister to afford special treatment to credit in times or areas of national or regional emergency. |
Insert "after the effective date" after "period" |
13(a)(ii) |
|
Linguistic and stylistic issues |
Change "and" to "or" |
15(c ) |
|
Change where the wording is wrong. |
Delete "related" in 15(c ) |
19 |
|
Agreed |
Delete reference to "and objects" in heading |
19(1)(f) |
|
This would be overly limiting, as it may be useful to have legal expertise, accounting expertise etc on the Board. Perhaps one could add that at least one representative should be a consumer representative. It is not envisaged that there will be any industry representation on the Board |
Add "at least one of which must be a representative of consumer interests" |
41(1) |
|
Expand SARS requirement across all relevant institutional forms |
Add section similar to 41(l)b into other registration sections, i.e. Credit Bureaux & Credit Providers (not debt counsellors) .(sections 43 and 48)
|
43(3)(a) |
provider unless that person:
prescribed by regulation |
43(3)b already create ability to set standards for staff of credit bureaux |
Delete from 43(3)(a) "at least equivalent to those prescribed for debt counselors" and replace "minimum" with "appropriate" |
46(3)b |
|
Agree, this would (a) prevent the state from creating such capacity; (b) would prevent provincial government from creating such capacity within provincial consumer desks, and (c) prevent debt counselors being employed within government to assist government employees. There appears to be no compelling reason why government servants may not be directors of Credit Providers either. |
Delete 46(3)b |
47 |
|
Limiting registration of activities that have a conflict of interest with debt counselling. Thelast point is already provided for indirectly in that the person must satisfy prescribed experience requirements.
|
47. (1) A registered credit provider, or an employee or agent of a registered credit provider, a juristic person or an association of persons may not be registered as a debt counsellor.Add new 47 1l)a: Individuals that are involved in, or employed in legal entities that are involved in any of the following areas, are disqualified from registration as debt councillors:- (i) debt collection (ii) operation of a credit bureau (iii) and any other activity that may impose a potential conflict of interests, as prescribed by the Minister. Add new 47(1)b : "Individuals that are under administration, or that are subject to debt rearrangement as per sections 86 and87 of this Act. are disqualified from registration as debt counsellors |
48 |
|
See section 41 above |
See section 41 above |
51(2) |
|
The proposed insertion does not capture fully what was intended in section 40(2)(c'
|
Insert "in their own names at or from more than one location or premises, as contemplated in section 40C2)(c)". |
54(5) |
|
It is an indication that the NCR considers the credit provider to be in contravention- this can be rephrased. |
Replace section 54C5) with "Failure to comply with a notice issued in terms of section is an offence." |
55 |
Insert new section 55(6) "Failure to comply with a compliance notice as contemplated in section 55 and without raising an objection in terms of 56, the National Credit Regulator may refer the matter to the Tribunal for an appropriate order |
||
57 |
down. SARB wants consultation on these matters
|
SARB is a prudential regulator - the dti can impose conditions on credit conduct but cannot de-register banks |
Consider following change to 57(2)a:- "(a) |
61(1) |
|
Accept |
Add "of persons" in S 61 |
|
Delete reference to "The Tribunal or " |
||
61(6)(b) |
|
If the person lodges a complaint with the NCR, the NCR will investigate, which will be of benefit to consumer. However, the Equality Court should probably be the only forum for hearing and adjudicating such complaints |
To be amended accordingly |
68(1) |
(1), or fails to disclose confidential information in contravention of paragraph 2(a), any aggrieved person may apply in the prescribed manner and form to the National Credit regulator to investigate a contravention of this section" |
Agree. Criminal sanction is likely to be ineffective and it would be more appropriate to deal with such cases administratively, through the Tribunal |
Omit subsection (2)(a) and insert a new subsection: "(3) Failure by a credit bureau to comply with a notice in terms subsections (1) and (2) above is guilty of an offence." |
69 |
empower. It is proposed that non- collateralised loans and those not repaid via direct debit or other EFT process be excluded from the NCR reporting process. Should this relief not be available we would request that the provision of address information for certain classes of clients of developmental credit providers & non- collaterised loans, be excluded from reporting requirements.
|
This section does not currently provide for current and historic information. Suggest that this be expanded, in respect of credit with duration of longer than 3 years as a transitional measure. Recommended special accommodation for developmental credit agreements. |
Add 69(2)e:- "Minister may prescribe alternative requirements that would apply to developmental credit providers" Regarding the issue with 69(3), provide in the transitional arrangement such as the following:- "In respect of pre-existing credit agreements with a duration exceeding 3 years, the Minister may prescribe information, not exceeding the information specified under 69(2), to be submitted by the credit provider to the register, within a prescribed period." (Still to be inserted) Delete section that restricts liability of National Credit Regulator and Register
|
70(2) |
|
Reasonable, request |
Modify 70(2)g:- "Issue a report to any person who requires it for a prescribed purpose or a purpose contemplated in the Act upon payment of the credit bureau's fee except where the Act explicitly provides that no fee be charged" |
70(2)(f) |
|
Accepted |
Add 71 (7):- Upon confirmation received in the prescribed form, that judgment has been rescinded and following receipt of an original court order for the recission, the credit bureau must expunge from its records the original judgement" |
70(6) |
not appropriate. The authors in the fall submission give complete reasons. Suggest: enforcement should be de-criminalised - the following paragraph to replace section 70(6) " Any person may apply in the prescribed manner and form to the National Credit Regulator to investigate any contravention of this section by a credit bureau " or Delete section 70(6) |
Agree at least that the administrative penalties - and the fine in particular, is the most effective disincentive. Criminal action in court does not appear to be the appropriate remedy, and is likely to be costly, time consuming and ineffective. |
Rephrase subsection (6) as follows" : Failure to comply with a notice issued in terms of this section is an offence." |
72(1)(b)(i) |
|
Reasonable request, and such a flood of requests for information would make the scheme unworkable and defeat the purpose of this section Consumer gets a free report only if CB has recorded info. Incorrectly. Need to re-phrase in the Bill. Suggested that CBA include this issue in a submission |
Insert transitional measure: "The Minister may prescribe the method and a time frame according to which free credit reports are to be requested in the first effective year of the Act" Amend wording as follows - insert the following words in 72(l)(b)(i)(cc) "only if a change was necessary" after the words "After challenging any information in terms of this section" |
72(1) |
|
72(1)d already specifies that it is the person who supplied the incorrect information, from whom compensation can be sought. However, the word "report" may be misleading. |
Amend 72(1)d as follows:- (d) be compensated, by who negligently or knowingly filed reported incorrect information, for the cost of correcting that information |
74 |
|
Agree |
Replace (2) with ’this section’ |
75 |
Insert new subsection (7): " in any advertisement concerning the granting of credit, a credit provider must state or set out the interest rate and other credit costs in the prescribed manner and form." |
||
76(1) |
The authors dispute that this is the case in respect of mortgage originators and salespersons of white goods etc who they contend are not agents of the credit provider. Suggested amendment to section 76 – words "by or on behalf of a credit provider" should be inserted after the word "solicitation" so as to clarify the meaning. Amendment to section 163(l)(a) - second line by the insertion of the words "or the consumer's agent" should be inserted after the words "credit provider directly' |
Broad wording as currently more appropriate. Refer 163. Where no commission payable, nothing to disclose.! |
Accept addition of words "by or on behalf of a credit provider" after the word solicitation" |
76(2) |
The requirements in the Bill with regard to written quotes after every oral solicitation and delivery of such written statements will add complexity and costs to the process and will require substantial changes to the existing processes undertaken by 'agents'. Cost of agreement being requested by the consumer and then not being accepted is likely to escalate due to the amount of work that now needs to be undertaken when soliciting for new business Recommend: Section needs urgent review
|
76(2) may be somewhat too broad, and we could exclude a general statement as to the availability of credit, while keeping the requirements when it comes to discussing a specific credit option. |
Rephrase 76(2):- Any person making an in-person oral solicitation for the purpose of inducing a person to apply for or obtain credit, must provide a written statement containing the information set out in subsection (1) when a specific credit offering is presented or discussed." |
76(11) |
|
The current section is very blunt and this is an area with considerable complexity. Consider leaving such detail to the regulations. |
Replace 76(1) with:- 76. (1) Any written solicitation for the purpose of inducing a person to apply for or obtain credit must include a statement -, |
77(3) |
|
Accepted |
77(2) & 77(3) moved to become part of 75. Delete remainder of 77. |
78(2)(a)(b) and (c) |
Suggest All credit transactions be subject to a "reckless credit" assessment and that section 78(2)(a)(b)(c) be deleted from the Bill
|
A possible solution is not to exempt emergency loans from the reckless lending provisions, and to require that level of indebtedness is assessed and to allow in exceptional circumstances for the credit provider to issue the credit nevertheless in the circumstances. |
Insert new sections which require that (1) documentary proof must be kept by the credit provider in each instance that a credit agreement in terms of 78(2)(a)-(c) is concluded; and (2) that the credit provider indicate the nature of the credit agreement when registering it with the National Credit Register. |
80 |
Suggest : Provisions on reckless credit should include unsolicited extension of credit to a consumer when the credit grantor had not concluded an affordability assessment with the consumer personally . The simple principle is that the credit should not be extended or increased , unsolicited or not, without an affordability assessment. |
Insert in 80(1):- "... agreement was made or the time when the amount approved per the agreement is increased. ... " Amend section 80(3 )(a) to read "my credit facility or facility in terms of which the consumer may draw down on a loan secured by a mortgage without reference to the credit provider, is the limit of that facility at that time." |
|
81 |
Omit "or the Tribunal" |
||
83 |
(a) the consumer is not required to make any payment under the agreement and in respect of a credit agreement for the provision of services on a continuos basis shall not be entitled to access to the service. (b) no interest, fee or other charge under the agreement may be charged to the consumer; and credit provider’s rights and obligations under the agreement , or under any law in respect of that agreement , are unenforceable , despite any law to the country" |
Amendment should indicate that the rights that a consumer may have in terms of a contract are also suspended |
Insert " rights and " in front of "obligations" |
89(2)(a) |
|
If point is not heeded, would be interfering with current law and accepted practices, which allow minors to contract under supervision of guardian |
Propose that unemancipated minors may conclude agreements with the consent of their guardians. |
902(k)(ii) |
|
Amend section to address concern |
Change section to refer to power of attorney in respect of any matter related to the granting of credit in terms of this Act |
90(2)(m) |
|
Seeks to contain the preferential and anti-competitive practices related to payroll deductions in respect of other credit providers - therefore does not outlaw preferences with respect to other deductions, only credit |
Replace "any other person" with "any other credit provider". |
92 |
|
Accepted |
Insert new subsection: "(3) Where the credit is extended for the purchase of an item with limited availability, the credit provider may make the quotation subject to the continued availability of the item." |
94(1)(b) |
Suggest: The two sections are contradictory and must be clarified or section 94(l)(b) should be deleted. There should be a responsibility placed on the credit provider to cancel the facility as soon as the card has been reported lost or stolen. |
Agree |
Delete 94(1)b |
102(1) |
|
Amended as per revised Insurance proposal |
Suggest adding 2 further subsections to 102(1) (a) an initiation fee, as per 101(1 )b, subject to the consumer having been offered the option of settling the cost of the initiation fee upfront and the consumer not having accepted such offer; (e) subject to section 106, the premiums of any credit insurance payable in respect of that credit agreement" |
103(1) |
Concern: Section 103(1) prohibits the creditprovider from catering for different interest rates on higher and lower risk portions of the debt. Suggest: Sub-section be amended accordingly |
Accepted |
Replace current section 103(1) with following: "The interest rate applicable to an amount in default or an overdue payment under a credit agreement may not exceed the highest interest rate applicable to any part of the principle debt under that agreement." |
104(3) |
Concern that same day notification is not realistic given volume of transaction and accounts in formal system |
If the notice is too long , it becomes redundant . Maximum period should be at next statement date, which would in most cases be within 30 days( a problem for housing loans ,where statement dates are further in between) |
Propose that written notification of clients should occur within30 days of the change in the rate; Section 104(3)(b) " if a rate is determined by referring to a reference rate as contemplated in section 103(4), the new reference rate." |
104(4) |
|
Accepted |
Delete Section 104(4) and 104(5) and delete "or a credit facility" from section 104(1)(a) |
106 |
To be revised as follows
(a) credit life insurance and insurance cover against any damage or loss of any property other than property referred to in subsection 1(b) , limited to the consumer's outstanding obligations to the credit provider at any time during the term of their credit agreement; and (b) in the case of immovable property that is subject to a mortgage in respect of a mortgage agreement, insurance cover up to the full asset value of the property for the term of the credit agreement. (2) In addition to insurance that may be required in terms of subsection (1), subject to the requirements of this section, a credit provider may offer a consumer optional insurance in relation to the obligations of the consumer under the credit agreement or relating to the possession, use, ownership or benefits of the goods or services supplied in terms of the credit agreement. (3) Despite subsection (1), a credit provider must not offer or demand that the consumer purchase or maintain insurance that is- (a) unreasonable; or (b) at an unreasonable cost to the consumer, having regard to the actual risk and liabilities involved in the credit agreement. (4) If the credit provider proposes to the consumer the purchase of a particular policy of credit insurance as contemplated in subsection (1) or (2)- (a) the consumer must be given, and be informed of, the right to waive that proposed policy and substitute a policy of the consumer's own choice, subject to subsection (5); (b) any policy required under subsection (1) or offered under subsection (2) by the credit provider must provide for payment of premiums by the consumer. (i) on a monthly basis in the case of small and intermediate agreements; (ii) on a monthly or annual basis in the case of large agreements; for the duration of the credit agreement. (5) With respect to any policy of insurance arranged by a credit provider as contemplated in subsection (4), the credit provider (a) must not add any surcharge, fee or additional premium above the actual cost of insurance arranged by that credit provider; and (b) must disclose to the consumer in the prescribed manner and form- (i) the cost to the credit provider of any insurance supplied, (ii) the cost to the consumer of any insurance supplied; and (iii) the amount of any fee, commission, remuneration or benefit receivable by the credit provider, in relation to that credit agreement; (c) must be a loss payee under the policy up to the settlement value at the occurrence of an insured contingency only and that any remaining proceeds of the policy must be paid to the consumer. (6) If the consumer exercises the right under subsection 4(a) to substitute an insurance policy of the consumer's own choice, the credit provider may require the consumer to provide the credit provider with the following written directions- (a) a valid direction in the prescribed manner and form requiring and permitting the credit provider to pay any premiums due under that policy during the term of the credit agreement on behalf of the consumer as they fall due, and to bill the consumer on monthly basis for (i)the amount of such premiums and[PMG Note: next line illegible] |
|||
107 |
|
See definition of prepaid transaction above |
Substitute prepaid transaction with incidental credit agreement |
|
111 |
|
Can re-consider the 20 days before credit providers take action . Suggestion that credit provider can only begin enforcement proceedings after complying with sec 111(2)(a). However , then also consider constraints imposed on consumer |
Delete constraint imposed on consumer with respect to notifying credit provider of incorrect information in section 111(1) Delete "at least 20 business days" from sec111(2)(b). |
|
116 |
Propose that the current system continue. This section would also impose difficulties in cases where the document was not in hard copy - e.g. an electronic or voice recorded version, which is legal and binding in terms of the ECT Act This section should provide that "it does not apply to automatic increases made in terms of section 119(4)" This section should also provide for electronic signatures or initials in line with the ECT Act |
Agree with proposed amendments |
Add to the following to section 116:- (c) the change is recorded in writing and signed by the parties; or (d) any oral change is recorded electromagnetically and subsequently reduced to writing" This section should provide that "it does not apply to automatic increases made in terms of section 119C4). |
|
121 |
|
Believe that there is legitimacy in some of the points raised. |
Amend section as follows: Substitute "account" with "agreement" in T21(1)(a); delete 121(b); delete "money or" and "or paying in frill for any services" from 121 (2)(b); delete "except in the case of a credit agreement entered into as contemplated in section 74(2)(b)" from sec 121(3)(b); Amend 121(1)a to read:- "(a) applies only in respect of a lease or an instalment agreement entered into at a location other that the registered business premises of the credit provider |
|
122 |
|
See definition of non-returnable goods above |
Delete reference to non-returnable goods |
|
1 23(2)(b) |
|
Accepted |
Replace reference to section 131 with section 129 |
|
125 |
|
The dti is concerned about the extent of the risk that is passed on to consumers. Before such a fee can be agreed to , there would have to be much more representation and engagement . Not clear that the absence of a penalty has been the major reason why fixed rate agreement are not successful in SA |
Insert: (d) in the case of a large agreement at a fixed rate of interest, an early termination charge no more than a prescribed charge, or a charge calculated in accordance with 125(2)c, if no charge has been prescribed. |
|
127 |
Finance is a bank as opposed to a motor dealer. FRB for instance would have to take possession of vehicles at short notice and provide storage - this is not feasible. (2) Procedure set out is slow and unwieldy and at odds with the test in section 128(2). Suggest: Amendment to section 127 (1) to provide that the consumer will be responsible for the costs relating to the surrender of the vehicle, including costs of storage and estimating the value of the vehicle (2) to expedite the procedure for the disposal of goods. There does not appear to be any reason why the consumer should be entitled to nominate in writing a person who is prepared to purchase the goods from the credit provider at the estimated value. |
As phrased, the consumer can at any time after a purchase return the items purchased to the credit provider and require the credit provider to sell the goods and ask the consumer to settle the net outstanding balance. Intention is that, where a consumer finds debt burden unmanageable, that s/he should, rather than default, return the goods purchased and get these to be sold and set off against the account. Suggestion that it is unfair that the consumer should be able to nominate someone else to buy the goods. |
Delete sec 127(1), sec 127(4)(b), sec 127 (5)(b), |
|
129 |
Suggest: amend the wording of the section 50 that the words "before the credit provider has cancelled the agreement" should be inserted after the words "at any time |
Most of the rights in section 129 are existing rights - it is not entirely clear why this would be unfair |
Cross-reference should be to 86(10); Rephrase section 129(1)(a) as follows: "may draw the default to the notice of the consumer in writing and propose that the consumer refer the credit agreement to a debt counsellor, alternative dispute resolution agent, consumer court or ombud with jurisdiction, with the intent that the parties resolve any dispute under the agreement or develop and agree on a plan to bring the payments under the agreement up to date; and" Add section 1 29(4)(c) "the termination of a credit agreement in accordance with Section 123". |
|
134(5) |
|
Agree |
Replace reference to subsection (4)(ii)(bb) with subsection (4)( |
|
136(2) |
|
Agree |
Replace section 136(2) with new section 136(2): "The National Credit Regulator may initiate a complaint against any person or entity for any contravention of the provisions of this Act" |
|
143(2) |
|
Agree |
Change reference to 27(c) |
|
148 |
|
That is because a decision by a single member of the Tribunal can be appealed to the frill panel if we provide too many opportunities for appeal, matters will never end. Also. The issues that a single member of the Tribunal can deal with are not substantive - therefore no need for more than one appeal possibility. However, proposal that all decisions of Tribunal may be taken on review to High Court and appeals to Supreme Court of Appeal |
Substitute "Supreme Court of Appeal" for "high Court" in 148(2)(b) and delete restrictions on appeals of single member hearings |
|
150 |
|
Clarify' orders that the Tribunal can make |
||
151 |
|
Section currently provides that Tribunal can only provide administrative fines where expressly provided. However, Bill does not expressly provide - interference from prohibited conduct. |
Delete subsection (1) |
|
156(1) |
|
Accepted |
Replace "firm" with 'juristic person" |
|
163 |
credit agent's business. Suggest: Amendments to be more sensitive to the competition issues that arise.
Suggest: Amend Bill to recognize (1) corporate credit agents employ more than a specified number of employees and the issue of ID cards by credit providers. The corporate credit agents issuing (as opposed to the credit provider issuing) the employees of the corporate credit agent with ID cards The latter ID cards would reference the lD card issued by the credit provider to the corporate agent (2) the interaction between the credit agent and consumer may not be in person |
Not sure that there is competition between mortgage originators and credit providers rather mortgage originators add more competition to the market - they are not credit providers, unless of course banks are financial intermediaries |
This section requires further review; minor amendments included at present |
|
164 |
||||
Schedule 2 |
|
Discussed with the National Treasury and SARB Implement consequential amendments to insurance Acts as agreed with Treasury. in order to ensure that there is no conflict between Credit Bill and insurance laws, and reflecting agreement between DTI and Treasury that the Credit Bill should regulate insurance that relates to credit transactions. |
Change to amendment to NPS Act. Insert at the beginning of new subsection 6A( 1) "On the date that this Act comes into effect, no person may conclude an agreement or engage in conduct which results in the change, manipulation, maintenance or application of a payment system..." Insert a new section (4): Any agreement existing when this Act comes into effect that is subject to conduct or agreement reflecting any of the principles contained in subsection 1-3, must be terminated by 3 1 December 2007. Consequential amendments to Insurance legislation: - Act 52 of 1998, Long-term Insurance Act: "The repeal of section 44 to the extent that the section applies to credit agreements to which this Act applies." 53 of 1998, Short-term Insurance Act: "The repeal of section 43 to the extent that the section applies to credit agreements to which this Act applies." Delete consequential amendments to Financial Services Ombud Schemes Act, 2004 |
|
Schedule 3 |
Section 93 : Apply to a pre-existing credit agreement |
Point taken
There is no retrospectivity here - however, the proposed amendment seems reasonable
|
Amend last row in table in item 4(2) to include "subject to sub item (3)" Section 4(3)(a) applies only to the extent that a document or statement contemplated in terms of sections (3)(a)(i) ~d (ii) has not already been provided to the consumer by the credit provider prior to the effective date Revise as follows: 8. As of the effective date a) the assets and liabilities of a regulatory institution designated by the Minister in terms of sec is A of the Usury Act, 1968, and any persons appointed as an inspector or in any other capacity in terms of the Usury Act, 1968, are or may be transferred to and are assets and liabilities respectively of the National Credit Regulator.". |