TRANSFORMATION IN SWIMMING SOUTH AFRICA
SETTING THE STAGE FOR BEIJING 2008 AND BEYOND
FROM A SELF REGULATORY TO DEMAND DRIVEN APPROACH
INTRODUCTION
Swimming South Africa first tabled a systematic programme of transformation in 1999/2000 to all provinces. That detailed document was to set the stage for the transformation of our sport at all levels, including administration, athlete participation, coaching and technical services. Targets were placed before provincial leadership in the hope that these organisational entities will, through the support of their affiliates, drive the process, with minimal intervention from the national centre. As we fast forward to 2004, most, if not all, the targets set in that four year plan have failed to materialise. Despite monitoring the process in the early stages of the last four year phase, it was obvious that the support from provincial leadership was, at best, poor. Most provinces reluctantly provided an updated status of the extent of transformation, and none provided any indication of their programmes for transformation or development.
In this new plan, which has to extend beyond a four year period, the approach to transformation has to be substantially different, driven through the national organisation on the basis of regulated quotas, taking into consideration regional and provincial differences. The agents for change, particularly in the medium to long term, will still nevertheless remain the provincial structures.
TRANSFORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT – 1999 REVISITED
In 1999 the relationship between development and transformation was described as the following:
"Development is considered to be the process of transformation of Swimming South Africa to represent the demographics of the country, with the emphasis on Black focussed aquatic programmes providing opportunities for disadvantaged children and adults. In the short term, this would entail the demographic representivity in all structures and activities of the organisation at club, provincial and national level before 2004."
AGENTS FOR CHANGE AND FACTORS IMPACTING ON AQUATIC TRANSFORMATION
Political Structures: (National Ministry of Sport; Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Sport)
The political structures of the country, consisting of democratically elected representatives of broader society have a responsibility to ensure that all aspects of social life in South Africa are accessible to all, and reflective of the demographics of the country. The inescapable fact that aquatic sport does not meet this standard implies that the pressures that are being increasingly placed on our sport is to be expected and is also legitimate.
As we meet our mission to become one of the premier sports in South Africa, we will increasingly find ourselves in the public spotlight. The consequence of this exposure means that our demographic unrepresentativity will constantly be challenged. Should our national teams not have adequate black, and more specifically African, representatives very soon, we should expect a moratorium being placed on our international participation.
Sponsors
As our sponsors seek to expand their products into previously underserved markets (particularly black communities), they will want their branding associated with sport that is readily visible in these communities. Aquatics is currently not providing our sponsors with this marketing avenue, and could theoretically place our relationship with these sponsors at risk.
Socio-economic situation
The primary limiting factor (assuming that our membership is committed to transformation) to increasingly black, and particularly African, representation in SSA is the lack of financial resources within the black community generally. Participation in the higher levels of aquatic sport require resources which the majority in our country do not have available as disposable income. While financial support can be invested in the short term in development programmes, this is not sustainable in the long term, nor can it support large number of potential elite black swimmers.
Thus we have to be innovative, engage all stakeholders, including our clubs, sponsors and government structures in developing programmes, identifying potential youngsters, and determining ways in which they could be supported to realising their full potential. Some of these are explored further below, as medium term strategies for advancing the process of transformation in Swimming South Africa.
A TWO PRONGED APPROACH: THE SHORT TERM AND THE MEDIUM TERM
Because of the various pressures for transformation in sport, and in aquatic sport in particular, it is necessary to define a two pronged approach such that the needs and desires of all stakeholders are appropriately addressed.
a) The Short Term
Background
Given the increasing pressure from state and the fact that after more than 12 years of a politically non-racial society, aquatic sport is still not reflective of the broader South African society, and given that our senior provincial and national teams consist almost exclusively of white participants, there has to be a rapid organisational response. Many will be critical of this, arguing that this is a knee jerk reaction to the recent governmental pressures – this is easily countered by the steadfast lack of transformation at all levels of our sport. Attempts at a gradual, sustained transformation process commenced in 1999, and as failed to deliver, and this failure has to be assessed, and met with a more concerted directed approach. We have to anticipate a major political backlash should our teams be demographically non-representative by Beijing 2008. To achieve the objectives of this short term plan, the transformation process moves from the failed self-regulatory "targets" approach of the 1999 Programme to the directed "SSA legislated quotas" approach.
Objectives
Approach – Objective 1
This objective will in the short term focus primarily on the discipline of swimming, unless a case can be made for the other disciplines consisting of individual participation. All senior team disciplines (water-polo and synchronised swimming) will be compelled to have a 20% black participation by 2008, and junior teams a 50% black participation, or else such teams will not be ratified. No team will be permitted to leave the country without the sanctioning of the President and the Executive member responsible for athlete development.
The Performance Manager of Swimming South Africa will develop criteria for the selection of African athletes into a Target Squad. This will be circulated to all provinces and coaches, and a squad will be identified. A programme designed by the National Coaching Director will be implemented on a regional basis, within the context of the National Squad Strategy. Black coaches will be involved in this programme, in line with the national strategy. The Performance Manager will be responsible for the tracking of the performance of these swimmers, and development of coaches, and reporting to the responsible Executive member for tabling at Executive meetings.
A full four year budget must be developed for this programme, with coaches being reimbursed, athletes being provided funds for travel to the training venues and for their participation in national competitions. These swimmers will be required to sign an undertaking of their commitment to the programme.
Approach – Objective 2
All aquatic disciplines and all sectors (athlete, coaching, technical officiating, team management and administration) will be expected to meet the quotas as stipulated by the SSA Executive, following a process of consultation with provincial leadership and national structures. All responsible agencies (e.g club, province, SASOA, other national structures) will be financially rewarded for exceeding the stipulated quotas, while failure to meet the quota will result in punitive measures. These quotas will be gradually increased over the next four years.
Wherever applicable, a two tier quota system will apply – provinces will be allocated to either a Category 1 or Category 2 status, with greater demands being placed on Category 1. The following provinces will be in Category 1: KwaZulu-Natal, Western Province, Central Gauteng, Northern Tigers and Eastern Cape. All remaining provinces will be accorded Category 2 status.
The quotas for the various levels of national competition, the various disciplines and the various sectors for the season 2004/5 are detailed in the tables below. The methods to achieve these quotas will be left entirely to the responsible agency, however, the SSA Executive, the national office and the national substructures will always be available to assist.
The quotas for national teams are reflected in table B. The responsible agency for the national teams will be the SSA Executive.
TARGET TABLES
A. ATHLETE PARTICIPATION DOMESTIC COMPETITIONS |
||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
Nat 'B' |
Snr Nat |
SCS |
|
|
Swimming |
397 |
194 |
92 |
31 |
27 |
|
|
|
Open Water Swimming |
|
|
|
4 |
6 |
15% |
|
|
|
||||||||
B. ATHLETE PARTICIPATION INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION |
||||||||
Swimming |
World Championships (LC) |
20% |
||||||
Africa Jnr Championships |
50% |
|||||||
Commonwealth Games |
20% |
|||||||
Diving |
Junior Teams |
20% |
||||||
Synchronised Swimming |
Senior Teams |
20% |
||||||
Junior Teams |
30% |
|||||||
Water Polo |
Senior Teams |
1 per team |
||||||
Junior Teams |
3 per team |
|||||||
Open Water Swimming |
Junior Teams |
30% |
||||||
|
||||||||
C. TECHNICAL OFFICIALS |
measured on 2 separate levels, ie (1) key and (2) additional officials |
|||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
Nat 'B' |
Snr Nat |
Other Snr Nat Comps |
Other Jnr Nat Comps |
SCS |
Swimming |
60% |
30% |
30% |
40% |
30% |
|
|
|
Diving |
20% |
|
|
|
20% |
20% |
30% |
|
Synchronised Swimming |
20% |
|
|
|
20% |
20% |
30% |
|
Water Polo |
|
|
|
|
20% |
20% |
30% |
|
Open Water Swimming |
|
|
|
20% |
20% |
20% |
|
20% |
|
||||||||
D. TEAM MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPATION |
||||||||
Swimming |
50% |
|||||||
Diving |
50% |
|||||||
Synchronised Swimming |
50% |
Measured per tour |
||||||
Water Polo |
50% |
|||||||
Open Water Swimming |
50% |
|||||||
|
||||||||
E. TEAM MANAGEMENT DOMESTIC PARTICIPATION (provincial targets) |
||||||||
Swimming |
50% |
|||||||
Diving |
50% |
Measured over the season as an overall target |
|
|
||||
Synchronised Swimming |
50% |
Provinces required to set relevant targets for club competitions |
|
|||||
Water Polo |
50% |
|||||||
Open Water Swimming |
50% |
|||||||
|
||||||||
F. PROVINCIAL LEADERSHIP |
Category 1 |
Category 2 |
|
|||||
Cat 1 Prov Committees |
50% |
CGA |
|
All other provinces |
||||
Cat 2 Prov Committees |
20% |
Eastern Province |
||||||
Cat 1 Delegations |
50% |
KZNA |
|
|||||
Cat 2 Delegations |
20% |
Northern Tigers |
||||||
Western Province |
||||||||
G. NATIONAL LEADERSHIP |
||||||||
Executive Committee |
50% |
|||||||
Sub-Committee's |
30% |
H. PROVINCIAL TARGETS |
||||||
Border |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
10 |
5 |
12 |
8 |
19 |
3 |
Level 2 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
10 |
1 |
Level 3 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
CGA |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
66 |
45 |
42 |
55 |
51 |
10 |
Level 2 |
30 |
14 |
7 |
22 |
11 |
8 |
Level 3 |
14 |
11 |
7 |
12 |
8 |
1 |
Nationals B |
14 |
11 |
8 |
13 |
9 |
2 |
Snr Nationals |
9 |
9 |
13 |
10 |
14 |
1 |
|
||||||
Eastern Province |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
20 |
2 |
10 |
13 |
65 |
11 |
Level 2 |
9 |
6 |
11 |
9 |
17 |
3 |
Level 3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
14 |
4 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
Easterns |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
13 |
10 |
19 |
11 |
21 |
1 |
Level 2 |
9 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
24 |
4 |
Level 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Nationals B |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Free State |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
21 |
16 |
19 |
21 |
25 |
5 |
Level 2 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
13 |
4 |
Level 3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
1 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
Griqualand West |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
8 |
8 |
22 |
11 |
31 |
3 |
Level 2 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
14 |
3 |
Level 3 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
KZNA |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
140 |
100 |
68 |
120 |
82 |
20 |
Level 2 |
73 |
27 |
20 |
50 |
37 |
23 |
Level 3 |
20 |
17 |
10 |
18 |
11 |
1 |
Nationals B |
11 |
11 |
32 |
11 |
32 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
3 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
1 |
Limpopo |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
200 |
4 |
Level 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
Level 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mpumalanga |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
12 |
6 |
32 |
11 |
58 |
5 |
Level 2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
Level 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
North West |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
26 |
26 |
35 |
30 |
40 |
4 |
Level 2 |
17 |
7 |
12 |
12 |
21 |
5 |
Level 3 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
Nationals B |
1 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Northern Free State |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
2 |
1 |
11 |
3 |
33 |
2 |
Level 2 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
Level 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Northern Natal |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
10 |
10 |
17 |
13 |
22 |
3 |
Level 2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
67 |
4 |
Level 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
1 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
NTS |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
11 |
3 |
16 |
12 |
63 |
9 |
Level 2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
16 |
15 |
Level 3 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
Nationals B |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
Snr Nationals |
2 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
Vaal |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
13 |
13 |
43 |
15 |
50 |
2 |
Level 2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
Level 3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Nationals B |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Western Province |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
92 |
49 |
62 |
70 |
89 |
21 |
Level 2 |
70 |
44 |
38 |
57 |
49 |
13 |
Level 3 |
48 |
17 |
13 |
40 |
31 |
23 |
Nationals B |
2 |
2 |
14 |
2 |
14 |
0 |
Snr Nationals |
6 |
6 |
19 |
6 |
19 |
0 |
TOTALS |
||||||
|
2004/5 Season |
2005/6 Season |
||||
|
PD Qualifiers (Number) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
PD Competitors (Number) |
PD Competitors (%) |
Actual Increase (Number) |
Level 1 |
447 |
294 |
38 |
397 |
51 |
103 |
Level 2 |
235 |
107 |
12 |
194 |
22 |
87 |
Level 3 |
96 |
54 |
7 |
92 |
12 |
38 |
Nationals B |
30 |
27 |
8 |
31 |
9 |
4 |
Snr Nationals |
22 |
22 |
7 |
27 |
9 |
5 |
Please note: |
||||||
1. Provinces will be required to achieve the number of competitors (column E), percentages (column F) are a guideline. Target measurement will be done against the number of swimmers required at each level of competition. |
||||||
2. Percentages for 2005/6 are calculated on the assumption that the total partcipation in a competition remains constant (2004/5), which is for calculation purposes only and is not an expectation |
||||||
b) The Medium Term
Background
Recognising that transformation is a process, and that the short term plans outlined above is intended to provide a quick redress to the lack transformation over the last five years, sustainability of the process of transformation is only possible through the implemetation of a clearly defined programme.
For the medium term, each structure and substructure of Swimming South Africa must implement a development programme which will address the objectives of transfomation within its ranks.
Objectives
Approach
Provincial Level:
Clubs
Provincial Executive
Discipline Boards
Technical and Selection Committees
National Level:
National Executive
National Head Office
National Technical Committees
Selection Committees
Responsibility and Reporting
The structure/substructure will be responsible for the development, implementation and continuous evaluation of the programme. The final responsibility for these programmes rests with the most senior manager of the structure/substructure such as the Chief Executive, President, Chairperson or Convenor.
The President of each of the provincial affiliates will be responsible for reporting to the National Executive about the provincial structures/substructures. These reports must be submitted to the National CEO at least one month prior to the Annual General Meeting. The provision of a Development/Transformation Report must become a constitutional requirement for registration or affiliation to SSA. The provincial report must indicate which structure/substructure within the province has failed to produce a programme, and the action taken against such structure/substructure. The report must indicate the targets and the success or otherwise of achieving these targets.
Incentives and Punitive Measures
The Executive Committee of Swimming South Africa will develop a policy to manage the implementation of the transformation plan of the organisation. This policy must be aligned to strategy defined by SASCOC and government, and will include punitive measures as well as incentives. The agency responsible for delivering on targets will be required to cascade these measures to their members.
Jace Naidoo
President
Swimming South Africa