THE PRESIDENTIAL PEACE INITIATIVE AND SOUTH AFRICA’S POSITION

VIS-À-VIS THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS

The Presidential Retreat (also referred to as Spier or the Presidential Peace Initiative) was conceived as an informal and non-directive opportunity for Israelis and Palestinians committed to finding a peaceful negotiated settlement to meet together and to hear first hand from the South African experience.

The intervention of the South African delegation, describing events preceding formal negotiations and the way in which negotiations were carried out, had not been heard by either the Palestinians or the Israelis before and both parties were very receptive to the information given. The way in which channels of communication had been established years before negotiations became a public reality; the way in which the ANC had formulated a strategy for the pre-negotiation period in order to bring their own constituency and elements of the white minority community with them; and the handling of negotiations in a climate of political violence were specific areas in which the two visiting delegations paid particular interest and related back to their own situation.

Subsequent to the Presidential Retreat, members of the Palestinian and Israeli delegations continued their dialogue in meetings in a number of other countries such as France, Germany, Greece and Russia. Whilst at one level these meetings were public and received media coverage, much of it mentioning the positive initiative of Spier, they also served to provide the space for the two sides to further develop a ‘final status agreement’.

To further the objectives of the Presidential Peace Initiative, and in review of the outcomes of Spier I, a Task Team on the Middle East Conflict was established incorporating the Presidential Support Unit and DFA. A work plan, including the under mentioned projects, (building up to the concept of South Africa hosting ‘Spier II’), has been actively persued by the task team.

Follow up to President’s Peace Initiative

The Peace Retreat formalised one of the key foci of South African engagement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – that of strengthening the voices for peace and building a common vision for peace. Contacts at government and civil society level have taken place with those Palestinians and Israelis who believe, not necessarily from the same starting point, that Israel will not achieve peace and security whilst the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people to national self determination remain unfulfilled.

The key strategic engagement of South Africa with the Middle East Conflict, as clearly shown by the Spier Presidential Peace Retreat of January 2002, remains the strengthening the "peace camps" in both Israel and Palestine; sharing the South African experience with a wide cross section of Israeli and Palestinian civil society and government; assisting the Palestinian reform process and supporting international peace efforts, in particular through the UN system.

Activities undertaken in relation to the Spier Presidential Peace Initiative

Main activities of 2002

Main activities first quarter of 2003

Proposed Work Plan for 2004

As Chair of the METT, the Deputy Minister agreed to the following work plan. The details are to be finalized with the Deputy Minister upon presentation of final project proposals respectively.

 

 

APPENDIX ONE

MEDIA STATEMENT AND ‘SPIER THREE PARTY COMMUNIQUE’

In consultation with key role-players involved in the Middle East peace process, President Thabo Mbeki hosted a Presidential Retreat at the Spier Hotel and Conference Centre near Stellenbosch from 9-11 January 2002. The Retreat was attended by senior participants from Palestine, led by former Minister Saeb Erekat and Minister Zaid Abu Ziad, and from Israel led by former Justice Minister Yossi Beilin and Speaker of the Knesset Avraham Burg. Several current and former South African Cabinet Ministers attended and participated as well.

The principal aims of the Retreat were:

* To support the ongoing initiatives towards the creation of a favourable environment to restart peace negotiations;

* Share the South African experience in negotiations, peacemaking and transition to democracy; and

* Support the strengthening of the peace camps in Palestine and Israel as well as the general dynamic towards peace.

The Retreat was a supportive initiative, bringing the participants together in an informal environment conducive to sharing the experiences and exploring creatively how to move the Middle East peace process forward.

At the conclusion of the conference the following communiqué was issued:

The Palestinian and Israeli delegations express their sincere appreciation to President Mbeki and the South African host delegation for their insightful contributions, time, and hospitality. They are also grateful to the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung and Spier Conference Institute for their contributions to the success of this meeting.

SPIER THREE PARTY COMMUNIQUE

Cape Town 9 – 11 January 2002

Palestinian and Israeli delegations met in Cape Town, January 9–11, 2002 at the invitation of President Mbeki of South Africa, in order to have a frank exchange of views and to discuss the South African experience.

For over a year, the ongoing violence and the resulting human suffering in our region have eroded support for peace to alarming low levels. This makes dialogue and understanding the other’s perspective more urgent than ever.

The South African Experience

Certain important points were raised from the South African experience that the parties thought were relevant for the Middle East including:

  1. The conflict cannot be resolved through violence and military means and that the only guarantee for stability and security is peace.
  2. The maintenance of effective channels of communications at all times and under all circumstances is a vital requirement.
  3. The legitimate representative of each side is a partner, and the peace camps need to strengthen and mutually empower each other.
  4. There is a need to take into consideration the fears and concerns of the other side and to engage seriously with them.
  5. Negotiations should not be approached from the perspective of a winner or loser. It is in each party’s self-interest that its interlocutor is satisfied by any agreement reached.
  6. The process should at no point be held hostage to extremists or their actions.

Principles of Peace

The delegations discussed the situation in the region and reiterated the need to immediately end all forms of violence between the two peoples and resume negotiations. They emphasized that the return to negotiations should be unconditional and that the setting of prior conditions has prevented negotiations for a year, which has only served to escalate violence and raises suspicion that such conditions are designed to avoid negotiations. They stressed the way forward can only be through the implementation of the Mitchell Recommendations and Tenet plan, in particular, a complete freeze of settlement activities. The sides remain committed to carrying out all their obligations emanating from the Mitchell report and the Tenet Plan.

As a morale imperative, occupation corrupts the occupier and oppresses the occupied. Accordingly, an end to the conflict can only be realized through permanent status negotiations that will lead to a two-state solution based on June 4th 1967 borders, through the implementation of USCR 242 and 338, with their respective capitals in Jerusalem, and a just solution to the refugee problem.

We envisage a new era of relations between Israel and Palestine based on mutual interests, respect recognition, security and good neighborly relations.

Our Objectives:

The delegations are committed to:

  1. Building a shared vision for peace and the future relations between the two people in time of peace.
  2. Preserving and developing prior achievements in particular those made in Camp-David, subsequent negotiations, the Clinton plan and Taba.
  3. Conducting joint action to strengthen the peace constituencies in both communities.
  4. Strengthening consultation, coordination, and cooperation in response to unfolding events.
  5. Continue to study the lessons of the South African experience and ways in which it may help advance the peace process.
  6. The three parties are committed to continuing their efforts and will announce in the near future steps to be taken to enhance this process.

The participants of the Spier meeting, welcome the initiative taken by President Mbeki and would appreciate continued South African efforts in seeking ways to help the parties in their quest for peace in the Middle East.