FINAL PROGRAMME

PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

POLICY WORKSHOP – 12th-13th APRIL 2005 AT MEETING ROOM 2.41-2.43, CAPE TOWN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTRE

Day ONE – 12 APRIL 2005

Time

Speaker and Organisation

FACILITATOR/SPEAKER

08h00

Registration

 

08h15

TEA - TO BE SERVED AT VENUE 2.4-2.6

 

08H30 – 08H40

Welcome and introductory remarks

Mrs TJ Tshivhase – Chairperson – PC on Social Development

08H40 – 09h10

 

 

Paula Proudlock – Children’s Institute

Intersectoral co-operation - Clause 4(1) of the Bill already provides for intersectoral co-operation. Need to discuss whether this clause should provide more detail.

Ms N Ned

09h10-09h40

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

09h40-10h10

Advocate Ann Skelton - Centre for Child Law,

Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria

Intersectoral co-operation - Clause 4(1) of the Bill already provides for intersectoral co-operation. Need to discuss whether this clause should provide more detail.

Ms N Ned

10h10 – 10h40

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

10h40 – 11h10

Mr Hendrik Van Der Merwe – Master’s Office

  • Guardianship - The acquisition of guardianship by grandparents or other family members where the parents of child are deceased. How best can the issue be dealt with in the Children’s Bill [B 70 – 2003] (Reintroduced?

Ms N Ned

11h10 – 11h40

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

11h40 – 12h10

Ms Jacqui Gallinetti

  • Guardianship - The acquisition of guardianship by grandparents or other family members where the parents of child are deceased. How best can the issue be dealt with in the Children’s Bill [B 70 – 2003] (Reintroduced?

Ms N Ned

12h10 – 12h40

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

12h40 – 13h10

 

Ms N Ned

13h10 – 13h50

LUNCH – TO BE SERVED AT VENUE 2.4-2.6

 

13h50 – 14h20

Nkosi J Ngubane – MEC for Social Services (KZN)

So-called harmful social and cultural practices - Virginity testing and female genital mutilation - "The whole debate around virginity testing, and female genital mutilation and what is considered "harmful cultural practices. And how this issue can best be dealt with in the Children’ s Bill [B70-2003] Reintroduced

Ms N Ned

14h20-14h50

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

14h50-15h20

Mr Linda Mngomezulu – SANCO

Corporal punishment (on clause 142 of the composite Children’s Bill) – on how best we can deal with this contentious issue in the Children’s Bill.

 

15h20-15h50

Questions for clarity

 

15h50-16h20

Dr Eva Seobi & Dr Moses Thindisa – Doctors for Life International

  • Children's right to consent to medical treatment as well as their right to access to reproductive health services - there has been some debate around issues such as whether the age of 12 in some provisions is advisable, and whether, when a child younger than 16 applies for an abortion, there should be a responsibility on the side of the health care worker to report statutory rape.

  • Access to abortion with regard to minors
  • Corporal punishment

Ms N Ned

16h20-16h50

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

16h50-17h20

Dr Janet Giddy - Director of HIV Programmes at McCord’s Hospital

  • HIV Testing

Ms N Ned

17h20

VOTE OF THANKS AND ADJOURNMENT FOR THE DAY

Mrs TJ Tshivhase – Chairperson – PC on Social Development

 

Day TWO – 13 APRIL 2005

Time

Speaker and Organisation

FACILITATOR/SPEAKER

08h15

TEA - TO BE SERVED AT VENUE 2.4-2.6

 

08H30–08H40

Welcome and introductory remarks

Mrs TJ Tshivhase – Chairperson – PC on Social Development

08H40–09h10

 

Dr Jackie Lofell - JHB Child Welfare

  • The conceptualisation of foster care
  • Child Protection Register –

 

Ms N Ned

09h10-09h40

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

09h40-10h10

Prof Sloth-Nielsen - UWC

.

Guardianship

  • The acquisition of guardianship by grandparents or other family members where the parents of child are deceased.

Parental responsibilities v/s parental power

  • The substitution of the concept – parental power with the concept – parental responsibility and rights proposed in the Children’s Bill.

Child-headed households

  • The whole area of how to deal with child-headed households (CHHs).

Ms N Ned

10h10–10h40

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

10h40–11h10

Prof C Himonga - UCT

  • The extent to which the Children’s Bill repeals Common and Customary Laws particularly in relation to certain cultural practices in Customary Law.

  • The question of whether the provisions of this Bill affect issues relating to customary law, the law of succession etc. This also relates to the whole area of what is considered "harmful cultural practices", and the whole debate around corporal punishment. Harmful social and cultural practices – focus currently on rights as opposed to policy.

Parental rights and responsibilities as defined in customary law and how does this link to formal statutory law

Ms N Ned

11h10–11h40

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

11h40–12h10

Rep from National House of Traditional Leaders

  • The extent to which the Children’s Bill repeals Common and Customary Laws particularly in relation to certain cultural practices in Customary Law.

  • The question of whether the provisions of this Bill affect issues relating to customary law, the law of succession etc. This also relates to the whole area of what is considered "harmful cultural practices", and the whole debate around corporal punishment. Harmful social and cultural practices – focus currently on rights as opposed to policy.

  • Parental rights and responsibilities as defined in customary law and how does this link to formal statutory law

 

Ms N Ned

12h10–12h40

 

  • Questions for clarity
 

12h40-13h10

Ms Carol Bower – RAPCAN

Preliminary investigation

  • Not all children in need of care and protection need to be referred to the children’s court. A discussion is needed on whether there is a need for a preliminary investigation before a child is referred to the children’s court. A preliminary investigation would -
  • Determine the need for a children’s court inquiry
  • Other relevant protective measures
  • Alleviate pressure on the children’s courts

Ms N Ned

13h10-13h50

LUNCH - TO BE SERVED AT VENUE 2.4-2.6

 

13h50 –14h20

Mr July Nkutha - Disabled Children’s Action Group

Children with disabilities and chronic diseases - Need to determine to what extent should the Bill cater for the needs of disabled children

Ms N Ned

14h20-14h50

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

14h50-15h20

Commissioner J Kollapan- SA Human Rights Commission

  • Children with disabilities - Need to determine to what extent should the Bill cater for the needs of disabled children.
  • Children’s Rights - The question of whether it is necessary/advisable to list children's rights in the introductory chapter, given the fact that these rights are already guaranteed in the constitution.
 

15h20-15h50

Questions for clarity

Ms N Ned

15h50-16h20

Dr Jackie Lofell

  • The question whether auxiliary workers, child and youth care workers and community care-givers should work under the supervision of a social worker.

The whole area of how to deal with child-headed households (CHHs).

Ms N Ned

16h20-16h50

Questions for clarity

 

16h50-17h20

Ms Debbie Le Pan – Wynberg’s Children’s Court

Preliminary investigation

  • Not all children in need of care and protection need to be referred to the children’s court. A discussion is needed on whether there is a need for a preliminary investigation before a child is referred to the children’s court. A preliminary investigation would -
  • Determine the need for a children’s court inquiry
  • Other relevant protective measures
  • Alleviate pressure on the children’s courts

Ms N Ned

17h20

VOTE OF THANKS

Mrs TJ Tshivhase – Chairperson – PC on Social Development