PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEES ON PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT & PUBLIC ENTITIES
MS PHINDILE NZIMANDE
CEO - EDI HOLDINGS
2 MARCH 2005
Current Industry Structure
Currently, South Africa operates in the traditional mode of vertical integration with financial and physical flows from the same path.
PMG Note [diagram not included]
Challenges Facing the Industry
- Current industry structure is highly inefficient owing to fragmentation
- Inadequate maintenance of networks
- Inability to supply electricity to the indigent
- Unequal treatment of consumers across the country
- Significant disparities in tariffs
- Absence of economies of scale in respect of investing in assets sharing of facilities, services, regulation, people development etc.
- Limited opportunity to introduce competition
Blueprint view of electricity distribution industry
Current blueprint view is focusing on resolving current issues within the electricity distribution industry.
PMG Note [diagram not included]
Industry Vision for Restructuring
To consolidate the South African electricity distribution industry six financially viable Regional Electricity Distributors
Areas of Focus
- Financial implications for Municipalities
- Other implications for Municipalities
- Effects on Free Basic Electricity
- Co-operation from Municipalities and other Stakeholders
Guiding principle
Objective:
To achieve a negotiated and lawful restructuring in the absence of enabling Legislation with the understanding that Municipalities & Eskom will not be adversely affected
Financial Impact on Municipalities
- Surpluses
- Leverage on Credit Control
- Credit rating
- Overhead Costs
- Stranded Costs
- Operational VAT
- Transaction Costs
VAT on transfer of assets
Legal and Financial Costs
Financial Impact on Municipalities
Principle |
Potential cost (R Million) |
Risk Mitigation |
Net impact |
Surplus |
|
|
|
Municipalities must not lose their surpluses |
258 p.a. |
Full carve out of electricity business with pro-rata of core administration |
0 |
Leverage on control credit |
|
|
|
It is important for municipalities to continue using electricity as a leverage for credit control |
783 p.a. |
Service Level agreement on improved performance of billing, accounting and credit control principles |
0 |
Credit rating |
|
|
|
No municipality will be affected negatively with regard to their balance sheet and credit rating |
Varies by local authority |
Credit enhancements structuring on the REDs |
0 |
Overhead costs |
|
|
|
There is a need to harmonise the method of handling and calculating overhead cost allocations varies from municipality to municipality |
195 p.a. |
To be part of the compensation package.
A 7,5% on gross expenditure is an acceptable percentage to be stated as a norm |
0 |
Stranded costs |
|
|
|
Municipalities will not be left with stranded costs when electricity is restructured |
Amount to be identified by due diligence |
To be part of the compensation package.
There may be cost that arise from ineffective use of floor space, system utilisation, etc. To be quantified by due diligence and negotiated.
|
0 |
Operational VAT implication |
|
|
|
It is important that municipalities do not forfeit any right on VAT reclaimable.
There is an indication that on average municipalities can forfeit between 5% and 8% of VAT output considering the change in business |
24 |
This can be achieved through a Service Level Agreement between the RED and the municipalities |
0 |
Transaction costs |
|
|
|
VAT is payable on the transfer and registration of assets |
100-150 |
EDI Holdings to apply for exemption from VAT payment from SARS.
In line with blanket exemption given during demarcation process. |
0 |
Legal and financial costs |
30 |
Cost to be borne by the REDs |
0 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term liabilities |
1 041 |
REDs purchase local authority electricity business and assumes the related balance sheet. |
0 |
Financial Impact on Eskom
- Financial impact on Eskom
- Net profit
- Credit Rating
- Taxation
- Stranded Costs
- Transaction Costs
- Legal and Financial Costs
Financial Impact on Eskom
Principle |
Potential cost (R Million) |
Risk Mitigation |
Net Impact |
Net profit |
|
|
|
Eskom must not lose its net profit |
13 p.a. |
Full carve out electricity business with pro-rata of core administration |
0 |
Credit rating |
|
|
|
Eskom’s credit rating must not be negatively impacted by restructuring. Current credit rating:
S&P Local Currency: A-
S&P Foreign Currency: BBB |
Awaiting results of Citibank study |
Credit enhancements restructuring on the REDs |
0 |
Taxation |
|
|
|
Taxation on sale of business |
4000 to 8000 |
Not applicable because of sale of business structuring or EDI Holdings to apply for tax exemptions and directives from National Treasury and SARS. |
0 |
Stranded costs |
|
|
|
Stranded assets and costs |
Amount to be identified by due diligence |
To be part of the compensation package |
0 |
Transaction costs |
|
|
|
Legal and financial costs |
30 |
Cost to be borne by the REDs |
0 |
Areas of focus
Financial implications for Municipalities
Other implications for Municipalities
Effects on Free Basic Electricity
Co-operation from Municipalities and other Stakeholder.
Other Implications
- Service Delivery Agreement
- Municipality remains service authority and RED becomes Service provider
- Relationship managed on agreed Key Performance Indicators
- Staff rationalisation and equalisation cost to be carried by the electricity distribution industry
Harmonisation of salaries is inevitable
This imbalance may exist in all public entities across industries and municipalities.
This will be addressed with organised labour and through normal processes in the industry.
Equalisation phased over a period of time
Other implications
- Tariffs will not increase outside acceptable norms
- NER will control this through their tariff policy and framework
- The DAY ONE tariff structure will continue as is in the short term
- There might be a request to increase tariffs to address the current state of assets
- Municipalities and Eskom hold shares in the REDs
- Viable businesses with positive business case
- Improved collections
- Efficient operations
- Reduction of maintenance backlog
Other Implications
- Business Case Analysis
- REDs are viable and sustainable
- Net Profit Margin of 4.6% to 6.1%
- Including:
- Salary harmonisation costs
- Payment to local authorities
- RED Taxes
- Maintenance backlog
- Positive return on invested capital 3.6% to 5.3%
- Positive economic profit & creation of shareholder value R252 to R755 million
- Positive Operating Cash Flow R5.6 to R7 1 billion
Governance
- REDs to have an optimum governance structure to achieve the objectives of restructuring
- Successful EDI reform relies on a governance framework that ensures single control and oversight
- Single oversight will support financial viability by:
- Assuring consistent application of operational efficiencies, scale economies and standardisation
- Allowing equitable distribution of capital to support system upgrades & electrification
- Applying consistent and equitable tariffs across geographical regions
- Assuring consistent distribution of Free Basic Electricity
Governance
Installing the correct governance framework is a critical action that will ensure the meeting of national objectives and sustain the financial viability of the REDs
National Objectives
- Low cost electricity
- Reliability, high quality supply
- Electrification
- Employee opportunity
- Financially sound & efficient
Financial viability
better access to capital markets at cheaper rates
more efficient operations
better collection rates
- A
sound Governance framework will:
- Improve and sustain the economic viability of the electricity distribution industry
- Improve overall reliability and service orientation of the industry
- Facilitate the fair treatment of all customers
Areas of focus
Financial implications for Municipalities
Other implications for Municipalities
Effects on Free Basic Electricity
Co-operation from Municipalities and other Stakeholder
Effects on government policy
- Restructuring will facilitate:
- Efficient delivery of Free Basic Electricity
- Focus on Free Basic Electricity
- Will form part of the Service Delivery Agreement with Municipalities
- RED to ensure consistent delivery of Free Basic Electricity across geographical area
- Execution of electrification programme
STATE OF READINESS WITHIN MUNICIPALITIES
Accession to the Co-operative Agreement
- The following Municipalities have signed the Co-operative Agreement:
- City of Johannesburg
- City of Tshwane
- Mangaung Local Municipality
- Motheo District Municipality
- Mogalakwena Local Municipality
- Polokwane Local Municipality
- Buffalo City
- Rustenburg Municipality
- Tzaneen Local Municipality
Accession to the Co-operative Agreement
- Municipalities which have Council resolution to sign the co-operative agreement:
- Ekurhuleni Metro
- Ethekwini Metro
- City of Cape Town
- Negotiations underway to sign the co-operative agreement with the following municipalities:
- Matjhabeng Local Municipality
- Enhlanzeni Municipality
- Msunduzi Local Municipality
- Mafikeng Local Municipality
- Kai! Garib Municipality
Ring fencing projects in Municipalities
- Institutional separation of the Electricity distribution business from other activities constitutes an essential step in the RED creation process in both Municipalities and Eskom.
- The following municipalities have completed ring fencing as a municipal entity:
- City of Johannesburg (City Power as an ME)
- Mangaung Local Municipality (Centlec as an ME)
- Ring fencing in Progress:
- City of Cape Town
- eThekwini
- Rustenburg Local Municipality
- Msunduzi Local Municipality
- Matjhabeng Local Municipality
- Polokwane Local Municipality
Other stakeholders
- Eskom
- Substantial progress made on migration from 7 to 6 regions to align with REDs establishment requirements
- Regular interaction and input
- Overall positive co-operation
- Labour
- Transitional Labour Relations Structure established and functional
- NEDLAC kept informed
- Other government departments
- Good co-operation among government
- Regular bi-lateral discussions
Thank you