DRAFT REPORT ON THE GAUTENG PROVINCIAL VISIT BY THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON HOUSING, UNDERTAKEN ON 11-15 OCTOBER, 2004

1. INTRODUCTION

The Portfolio Committee on Housing undertook a provincial visit to Gauteng, between 11-15 October 2004.

1.1 Members of the delegation, were as follows:

· Ms Z Kota (Chairperson) ANC

· Ms BN Dambuza ANC

· Mr TS Dodovu ANC

· Mr DC Mabena ANC

· Mr GD Schneemann ANC

· Mr SJ Masango DA

· Mr AC Steyn DA

· Mr BW Dlamini IFP

· Rev MS Khumalo ACDP

Staff:

Ms M Ntuli - Committee Secretary

Ms E Scholtz - Secretary to Chairperson

2. PURPOSE OF THE PROVINCIAL VISIT

The main purpose of the visit was to exercise its oversight role by assessing the provision of basic infrastructure, assessing the quality of housing units provided, assessing the pace of housing delivery, interacting with the Department of Housing. It was also to monitor the involvement of women and other disadvantaged persons in the housing delivery process as well as attention given to the emerging contractor. The committee also looked at challenges experienced by the provincial and local governments in the housing delivery process.

DAY 1

The delegation visited the National Department of Housing in Pretoria, where they received a presentation on the Annual Report 2003/4 and progress made by the Department. The presentation also dealt with the activities/programmes of the Department of Housing.


The delegation received apologies on behalf of the Minister of Housing, Dr LN Sisulu as well as Ms MZ Nxumalo, Director General, who joined the briefing ater.


Before the presentation by the Department of Housing, the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Housing expressed dissatisfaction at not having received prior notification of the apology of the Minister and the Director General, because there was a visiting delegation from Iran which would be hosted by the Department of Housing.


PARTICIPANTS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING

Ms MZ Nxumalo

· Mr L van der Walt

· Mr P Chauke

· Mr A Osman

· Mr J Wallis

· Mr T Chiloane

· Mr D Barclay

Mr M Dlabantu


Mr Dlabantu led the delegation and gave the Committee an overview of the briefing. Other participants from the Department of Housing participated by briefing the Committee on the activities of the Department of Housing which are organised in the following seven (7) programmes:

· Programme 1: Administration by Mr Barclay

· Programme 2: Housing Policy Planning & Research by Mr vd Walt

· Programme 3: Housing Programme Management by Mr Wallis

· Programme 4: Housing Sector Performance by Mr Chauke

· Programme 5: Communication by Mr Chiloane

· Programme 6: Housing Development Funding by Mr Dlabantu

· Programme 7: Housing Equity by Mr Osman


The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Housing, requested the Department of Housing to try and make the housing information brochures as well as promotional material available in their offices in Parliament, so as to distribute them to the public. She also commended the Department of Housing for their beautiful offices and furniture.


Mr Mabena - MP gave a vote of thanks on behalf of the delegation.


DAY 2

The delegation met with the Gauteng MEC for Housing, Ms N Mokonyane at the Parktonian Hotel, where they had a briefing on the work and activities of the Gauteng Department of Housing. She said she was in the process of putting together a hotline, which will make people understand what their rights were. She also told the delegation that Public Works together with the Department of Housing have put together an anti-corruption team in the province.


The MEC cited the following challenges:

· There is high concentration of informal settlements in the area such as Ekurhuleni and Mshayazafe.

· The expansion of informal settlements due to migrant labourers who do not go back home after retiring.

· Many places were still using bucket system especially Ekurhuleni. Working towards converting hostels into rental housing.

· In terms of land ownership, prime land is still owned by private sector and private individuals.

There was a large number of housing stock.


After the MEC, Mr Martin Maphisa gave the delegation a presentation on the Annual Report as well as the budget of the Department of Housing.


The Chairperson thanked the Department of Housing for their presentation. She stressed that the delegation was not there to monitor the Department of Housing but to look at the critical role played by other stakeholders.


The delegation thereafter visited the Gauteng Legislature where they met with the Standing Committee on Housing. Mr G Tsotetsi, Chairperson of the Select Committee, welcomed the delegation. Mr M Molekwa briefed the delegation on their activities as the Gauteng Department of Housing.


Comments by the delegation:

· There was a need for the Standing Committee on Housing to work with other existing institutions such as, Human Sciences Research Council, NGOs and CBOs.


Mr Dodovu gave a vote of thanks.


The delegation was then given a presentation on Alexandra Renewal Project. The MEC told the delegation that Alexandra Project has been in existence for a number of years. The different categories of the community were well represented in Alexandra, namely the young and energetic, as well as the old and experienced. It was agreed that there should be one political head in Alexandra, and that is the MEC for Housing.


She also stated that Alexander Project was not a presidential project, although the president visited it. The deadline for this project is 2009.


Mr. Dhlamini gave a vote of thanks.


The delegation then visited the following projects:

· Alexandra Project

· M1 & M2 Men's Hostel upgrade project

· Pan Africa

· Helen Joseph

· Mandela Yard


At the M2 Men's hostel, the delegation met a woman contractor on duty, Ms Melita Raseale, from Limpopo province (contact No.082 5467 998). She shared one of her major challenges with the delegation as follows:

Late payments result in her sometimes having to stop working, as she cannot afford to pay the workers.


Other major challenges in Alexandra are:

· People were not paying for services.

· Different Ministers come in to see the Alexandra Renewal Project but do not leave any funds to support the project.

· Upgrading of the area is very slow due to none participation (integration) of other departments such as the Department of Health, Department of Education, Department of Sports, etc.

· The rate of HIVIAIDS is extremely high in the area.


DAY 3

1. Introduction

During the third day of the provincial visit, the delegation had a briefing by the Mayor of Westonaria Local Municipality, Ms Maserame Khumalo. Also present were members of the Department of Housing in Gauteng, as well as local Councillors from Westonaria Local Municipality.


The Mayor's briefing was followed by the presentation on the Bekkersdal Urban Renewal Programme by the Gauteng Department of Housing.


1.1 In her welcoming address, the Mayor thanked the delegation for coming and for the interest shown in the Bekkersdal Renewal Programme. The Mayor gave a brief background on how the Bekkersdal informal settlements started and how far they have proceeded with the project. She then stated that overall, the project is funded by the Gauteng Department of Housing.


1.2 She also apologised on behalf of the Gauteng MEC for Housing for not being able to attend the briefing and the presentation as she had other prior commitments.


2. PARTICIPANTS

Also present, were members of the Bekkersdal Development Forum, Community Liaison Officers (CLOs), staff from the Gauteng Department of Housing, as well as members of the Bekkersdal community.

2.1 The Mayor cited the following challenges, which are experienced in the Project:

1) Disputes sometimes occur amongst building contractors over the project, with some displaying characteristics of wanting to own the project.

2) There is a general lack of communication amongst the stakeholders in the project.

3) Generally there is slow progress experienced in the development of the project.

4) There are community forums in place, but the project is still not running smoothly.

5) In general, the planning stage of the project took longer than was anticipated.

6) There is a general lack of skills within the community.

7) The community of Bekkersdal is only comfortable with local people to work in the project and do not welcome outsiders.

8) The community wants to tender for projects but have no skills but we as government don't want to give it to them because they are not capable of giving a good end product.

9) Land is not safe to build because of dolomite areas.

10) Some areas had electricity supply but were stripped by the residents because they needed it but had no funds to pay for it.

11) Qverall, 60% of the community is unemployed.

12)Approximately 8 000 people are still listed with the Department of Housing

13)The bucket system is still in place due to no pipes as people are moving all over.


2.2 Comments by the Chairperson: PC on Housing

· She was impressed with the wide consultation held with other sister organisations such as the Department of Provincial & Local Government (DPLG).


The Gauteng Department of Housing then gave the delegation a presentation on the Bekkersdal Renewal Project. In their presentation, they stressed the good working relationship between the Department of Housing and the Bekkersdal Development Forum. All three (3) spheres of government worked together to promote the development in the area. Bekkersdal is devided into two sections, namely, Bekkersdal formal area and Bekkersdal informal area.


Mr Steyn gave a vote of thanks for this session.


After lunch, the delegation travelled to Bekkersdal to do site visits such as, the taxi rank, transit camp and the toilet programme. There is a clinic, Police Station and a high school (Letlake High School), and also some emerging services in the CBD area.


Thereafter, the delegation attended the official opening ceremony of the Bekkerdal Information Hub by the Gauteng MEC for Housing, Ms N Mokonyane. Also present were, the Mayor of the Westonaria Local Municipality, Ms M Khumalo, members of the Bekkersdal community, local Councillors and a Preacher, Mr Z Seyabi who said the opening prayer. The Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Housing also thanked the Bekkerdal community for their willingness to participate in the development projects.


The Hub is part of the offerings that come with the Bekkersdal Renewal Project (BRP). It is based on the realisation that the general well-being of the residents is vital in elevating the quality of life within the target community. The BRP also puts much emphasis on investing in the human capital of the local community by opening access to information.


In line with this, the Information Hub is a central point in Bekkersdal where information can be disseminated and accessed by the community as well as the key stakeholders in the project. Records of the BRP progress and activities will be kept at the centre. It will also serve as an information office for all project team members.


In her speech, the Gauteng MEC, Ms N Mokonyane thanked all stakeholders for their contribution to the success of the project. She encouraged the community of Bekkersdal to use the Information Centre and to look after it, as it will make their community develop even further.


Day 4

The delegation visited Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality where they were met by the Mayor, Mr Duma Nkosi, local Councillors and staff from the Municipality. The Mayor stated that so far, Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality is the fastest growing municipality in South Africa. It is made of nine (9) towns, which were brought together under one municipal authority.


Mr. Neville Chaince, Director of Housing, made a presentation on their housing activities. After the presentation, the delegation asked the following questions:

· Are physically challenged individuals being catered for in the housing units?

Do people who buy the housing units get loans from the bank?


Response by the Mayor

· The physically challenged are catered for in the housing units, with about 49 units having been provided specifically for this purpose.

· They hope to have eradicated the informal settlements by 2014.

· In most cases, the housing units are overcrowded. The sewerage system runs into the roads because about six (6) families live together.

· Rental stock is a serious issue. People are converting offices into flats.

· They have engaged the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research to conduct research activities in the area.


The Mayor concluded by asking the delegation for their support.


The delegation thereafter visited the following social housing projects:

· Pharoe Park - 440 housing units

· Germiston Phase 2 - 558 housing units

· Troyville - 120 housing units

· Bricksfield - 1 400 housing units (under construction)


The delegation also visited the offices of the Cope Housing Association and the Johannesburg Housing Company and received a presentation about their social housing activities in the Gauteng province.


DAY 4&5

The delegation visited the following housing institutions in their offices. This was a courtesy visit aimed at familiarising the committee with the work of the housing institutions and also to extend to them an invitation for the public hearings to be held on 2-3 November 2004, in Parliament:

· National Urban Renewal Council Housing Association (NURCHA): staff compliment of 43

· National Housing Finance Corporation (NHFC): staff compliment of 74

· Social Housing Foundation (SHF): staff compliment of 25.

· Servcon Solutions: staff component of 124

· Thubelisha Homes: staff component of 52

· National Home Builders' Registration Council (NHBRC): staff component of 197 (nationally).


The delegation noted a lot of female employees in managerial positions.


The delegation completed the visit at 1 4h00 on Friday, 15 October 2004.