AD HOC COMMITTEE ON COMMUNICATIONS

DRAFT REPORT ON THE GCIS BUDGET VOTE PUBLIC HEARINGS

 

1. Introduction

The Ad Hoc Committee on Communications held its public hearings on the GCIS Budget Vote on 15 June 2004.

2. Participants

2.1 Government Communication and Information System (GCIS)

2.2 International Marketing Council (IMC)

2.3 Media Development and Diversity Council (MDDA)

3. Presentations

3.1 GCIS

The presenter, Mr Joel Netshitenzhe welcomed the invitation from the Ad Hoc Committee to make a presentation on the GCIS Budget Vote No. 7. The presentation dealt with communication milestones of the past year and the communication challenges of the Second Decade of Democracy.

 

 

 

 

(i) Communication milestones of the past year

  1. The Growth and Development Summit and its extended follow-up, which included a National Imbizo Focus Week on the theme of A People’s Contract for Growth and Development. This was the largest Focus Week, which included 140 events (which compares to the 170 events during the first Focus Week) involving representatives from all the spheres of Government across the country.
  2. The completion of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) process with the release of its final report also required an integrated communication strategy across all structures of Government. Similarly, the annual 16 Days of Action for No Violence Against Women and Children also required the same strategy. This campaign extended its reach and impact.
  3. The Ten Year Review, managed by the Presidency, and the release of the Census 2001 results, required interaction across all departments both with the public and with a range of researchers and stakeholders, including the media. Given the importance of the Ten Year Review for evaluating progress and assessing future challenges, the GCIS ensured that the results of the review reached as many citizens as possible.
  4. The GCIS also played a role in Ten Year Celebrations, locally and abroad, through its work in support of the Inter-Ministerial Committee.
  5. The GCIS played a central role in the communication campaign around the 40th anniversary of Africa Day, and it is intimately involved in the integrated work of Government to realise the objectives of the African Union and New Partnership for Africa’s Development (Nepad).
  6. At the end of the current financial year, 56 Multi-Purpose Centres (MPCCs) have been opened. Government is thus well on course to meet the objective of 60 MPCCs by the end of the 2004 calendar year, with the aim of one MPCC in each district and starting the protracted programme to have one MPCC in each of the 248 municipalities. A joint effort with the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) saw the establishment at three MPCCs of pilot Business Zones that bring information about economic opportunities and support services within easier reach of communities. The GCIS will review and assess the programme after the initial implementation.
  7. The past year also saw intensive interaction with the Department of Public Service and Administration in preparation for the introduction of Community Development Workers and the launch of the Batho Pele e-Gateway. The Bato Pele e-Gateway is an initiative to assist citizens getting access to government services through the use of Information and Communication (ICT).
  8. The process towards the Transformation of the Advertising and Marketing Industry is also making progress, drawing on the impetus given to it by the Portfolio Committee on Communication. A baseline empowerment survey has begun. This will help the industry in setting benchmarks and targets (some benchmarks and targets have been developed and implemented) for transformation that will inform a balanced scorecard and a charter. Research is also in progress to update the Advertising Transformation Index that compares adspend against the composition of the population and audiences. All this work will inform the report which the Transformation Monitoring and Steering Committee will be giving to the Portfolio Committee later this year.

(ii) Taking stock

Government’s capacity to meet the communication challenges of major initiatives, as well as the ongoing work of communication in support of the implementation of the Government’s Programme of Action, depends on the continuing progress in key areas in the core mandate of the GCIS. This means strengthening the Government Communication System; widening access to Government information as well as more broadly to the means of receiving and imparting information and ideas. Progress continued in these areas during the period under review.

GCIS has had to engage in a longer-term assessment of progress of its work in the First Decade of Freedom as a foundation for addressing the communication challenges of the next decade. GCIS therefore looked at its directives which resulted from Cabinet’s adoption of the recommendations of the Comtask Report.

These are:

  1. Access to communication and information: The major initiatives for enhancing the infrastructure and environment of communication are making an impact.

  1. Government-wide communication system: A more effective system is in place to promote coordination and coherence, compared to five years ago.

  1. International communication: This is another focus of the Comtask Report, which is getting more coherent, and is helping to improve South Africa’s image.

  1. Relations between government and the media: The relationship has improved. More regular contact has been promoted between the Executive and the media, including through the Presidential Press Corp.

(iii) Challenges in the Second Decade of Freedom

The Ten Year Review concluded that if we are to reach the higher growth and development path, then we need a major intervention to reinforce the consolidation of democracy with measures aimed at integrating all of society into a growing economy from which they can benefit. Given this conclusion, the question arises, how can GCIS enhance the government communication system and its operations in ways that contribute to this process?

Corresponding to the four broad national challenges of the next decade, are strategic communication initiatives that should act as catalyst for the general enhancement of the communication system and its operation. The challenges for GCIS are thus:

  1. Providing leadership in government communications and ensuring better performance by the communications system

  1. Building a framework of communication partnerships informed by an encompassing vision around common development objectives

 

 

  1. Promoting awareness of the opportunities that democracy has brought and how to access them

  1. Promoting awareness of the institutions and programmes of continental and regional integration and development

  1. Communication research and information: GCIS will play a key role in identifying areas of communication research as well as receiving relevant research reports from other sectors.

(iv) Strategic plan

In the first months of the Government’s new term it will be of vital importance to speedily disseminate the detailed programme of action and timeframes which the President outlined in the State of the Nation Address. To this end there will be a major multi-media transversal campaign in all languages. This will include National Imbizo Focus Week during September.

The thrust in Government’s programme of action towards the First Economy and concerted Second Economy interventions will require corresponding communication thrust. This will need multi-media campaigns appropriate to the fact that the economically marginalised also tend to have least access to the information which they could use to change their situation. This would require new communication products, including a mass publication on economic opportunities produced by the Economic Cluster which will be launched in a matter of weeks.

Promoting partnerships will be a continuing theme of Government communication, receiving more emphasis to build on the greater consensus around development goals and a greater readiness of social sectors to work together, which are reflected in the positive mood of the country. This will include promoting participation of the public in implementing programmes to improve their own lives as well as promoting partnerships with those sectors of society whose command over resources is critical to the success of policies for a growing economy. It will also involve building partnerships with communicators outside Government.

Enhanced unmediated communication and improved interaction with the media will both be pursued. The former will include building on progress in making Imbizo an integral part of governance, amongst other things further integrating door-to-door inteaction in Imbizo.

(v) Budget and establishment

The budget for the financial year 2003/04 was R178.5 million. There was over-expenditure of R112, 000, equal to the required provision for Thefts and Losses. The budget for the current financial year (2004/05) is R203.1 million, including an increased allocation for the IMC and additional allocation by the National Treasury for the Tenth Anniversary Celebration campaign.

Regarding the GCIS establishment, the following has been noted:

3.1.1 Questions and issues of concern raised by the Committee

  1. What are GCIS doing to expand the MPCCs to make it more accessible to the rural communities? In this regard, is GCIS using the existing Traditional Council Structures to house the MPCCs?
  2. The Public Service Commission (PSC) Report on MPCCs made certain recommendations. What is being done regarding these recommendations, for example, the PSC Report commented on the services being offered by MPCCs in that departments have not budgeted for staff to work in the MPCCs which hampers the quality of services being offered. Also, there seems to be no integrated plan from the various departments when MPCCs are established.
  3. The PSC Report also made recommendations regarding the state of the MPCCs physical structures. What is Government doing to ensure that the MPCCs are housed in quality structures?
  4. What are the linkages between telecentres and MPCCs?
  5. What is GCIS doing to help the plight of the Parliamentary Press Gallery?
  6. It is not only the rural communities but also the urban poor and the unemployed that rely on radio for information. Is GCIS targeting these groups?
  7. Are the visitors to the Government Online website from inside South Africa or outside?
  8. GCIS published a telephone number for people to call regarding the TRC reparations, which was incorrect. When GCIS facilitated this service did they do any follow-up regarding the incorrect information, and when did GCIS realise the information (telephone number) was incorrect?
  9. For how long is the Ten Years of Freedom celebrations campaign going to continue?
  10. What is the global amount allocated for Imbizos?
  11. Are Imbizos accessible to the deaf? Do GCIS make provision for the deaf when they use the big-screens to screen major events?
  12. The use of big-screens to screen events such as the State of the Nation Address is applauded, however it does not always take into consideration the linguistic diversity of the country.
  13. What is the status of the Presidential Press Corp?
  14. What is the GCIS doing to ensure that its products are reaching everyone?

3.1.2 Response by GCIS

  1. Phase 2 of the MPCCs initiative are being implemented and Government is conducting an audit to ascertain how existing structures, such as the Traditional Council structures, can be turned into MPCCs and thus reaching the goal of establishing 284 MPCCs. The envisaged rollout of 284 MPCCs should suffice to cater to the needs of all. Furthermore, the Communication Officers in the MPCCs should travel within the location where the MPCC is situated so as to distribute material, and work with other partners to disseminate information.
  2. The recommendations of the PSC regarding MPCCs are being dealt with. The National Inter-Sectoral Steering Committee NISSC) has written to DGs in all departments regarding the problems raised in the PSC Report. The NISSC and GCIS are also working closely with the Department of Public Works to improve the quality of the physical structures of the MPCCs. However, Government has not reached a stage yet to legislate to ensure that departments contribute to the successful operation of an MPCC.
  3. The 3000 buildings identified for the use of MPCCs include the Traditional Council structures. A decision must be taken which sites are going to be utilised.
  4. GCIS is working with other role-players/partners regarding the linkages between telecentres and MPCCs.
  5. GCIS is not in the position to interfere with the matter between Parliament and the Parliamentary Press Gallery.
  6. GCIS is working with the Department of Trade and Industry, and others, to target the unemployed youth. GCIS information is not making a great impact amongst the youth and it remains a challenge to GCIS, which need to be addressed. GCIS is also looking at finding more effective communication strategies to reach the unemployed and thus contributing to bridging the First and Second economies.
  7. It is difficult to ascertain where the visitors to the Government Online website are from. However, GCIS should perhaps devise some mechanism to see where the hits to the site come from.
  8. The problem with the incorrect telephone number appearing in a GCIS product is unfortunate as GCIS takes great care when publishing information. It was only after the material had been published that a new telephone was given, and it was unfortunately too late. However, the matter was rectified and those wishing to access the service could do so.
  9. Most of the budget for the Ten Years Celebrations has been spent, although it is still a line item in this year’s budget. The Ten Years Celebration is intended to continue for the rest of the year.
  10. There is, unfortunately, no global figure for the cost of the Imbizo’s. However, GCIS recognises that, for the sake of transparency, it should have been included. GCIS is working towards rectifying this. Products related to the Imbizos are produced not only for Imbizos, but relate to other activities as well.
  11. GCIS rely on broadcasters, in some instances, to provide services to the deaf. Similarly, GCIS also relies on the broadcasters to provide simultaneous interpretation facilities to provide for linguistic diversity. GCIS does ensure that services to the deaf are available when using the big-screens. Services for the deaf at the Imbizos is a weakness, which GCIS has recognised and will be working on improving. In most cases where events are screened on the big-screens, such as the State of the Nation Address, Communication Officers or GCIS officials provide some linguistic service to the communities.
  12. The Presidential Press Corp is not functioning optimally. This is so because the media would prefer more regular briefings than the irregular briefings that are held.
  13. GCIS, together with other partners, are working towards improving the capacity of Government Communication Officers. To this end, an Academy of Communications to train Government Communication Officers has been initiated. The first class had an intake of 46 students. The annual Government Communicators’ Award is also encouraging communication officers to improve.
  14. GCIS is in partnership with the FRU and others to launch a Community Film Festival, which will be shown at MPCCs. Films and documentaries about Africa will form part of the film festival.
  15. GCIS should also look into the possibility of making some of its products available at commercial outlets.

3.2 The International Marketing Council (IMC)

The primary objective of the (IMC) Trust is to develop and implement a pro-active and coordinated international marketing and communication strategy for South Africa.

In order to achieve this, the primary objective must:

(i) Operational Highlights

Since its establishment in 2001, the IMC has initially started building a framework for, and laying a foundation on which to build, "Brand South Africa".

Key highlights of the IMC include, amongst others:

  1. Advertising: In April 2003, the "Brand South Africa" national pride campaign was launched on radio, and in May the launch of the television advertisement, "Today I woke up . . ." was launched. Approximately 10 000 radio spots and 337 television spots were aired. The television advertisement has subsequently won the FM ADFOCUS 2004 award for "Pay-off line of the year". These advertisements had a ripple effect on the big corporations. Many corporations, such as banks, are beginning to change their advertisements to reflect images or stories, which tell a positive story about South Africa.
  2. Corporate support: The IMC’s television advertisements have been used in internal communications, corporate events and in some instances for international audiences. Organisations like KPMG, the BBC, the CSIR, Hollard Insurance, Coca Cola, Discovery Health, the SA Consulate General in New York, the South African Textile Industry Export Council, TISA, the Department of Environmnetal Affairs and Tourism, SA Rugby and Ethekweni Municipality were amongst the many who approached the IMC to use the advertisements in their communications.
  3. Valuing the brand: During the period under review, Professor Roger Sinclair used his BrandMetrics methodology to calculate the value of South Africa as a brand. Based on this methodology, "Brand South Africa" is estimated to be worth R379.5 billion today, which places it alongside brands like Coca Cola, IMB and Microsoft.
  4. Thought leaders: The IMC invited Dr. Hiscam El-Agamy, Director of Corporate Development for the International Institute for Management Development (IMD), to South Africa to communicate an outsider’s perspective on the country, as it is reflected in the IMD International World Competitiveness Yearbook 2003. The IMC also hosted two events at the JSE Securities Exchange during which Dr. El-Agamy inspired his audience with a presentation on South Africa’s impressive, but little known rankings. The presentation aimed to encourage the business community in particular, to focus on the country’s many inherent successes, strengths and skills, and to actively promote these.
  5. The South African Story: The "South African Story" booklet, which is filled with interesting facts that illustrate how much South Africa has achieved in its 10 years of freedom, was launched towards the end of 2003. This booklet was compiled for South Africa’s many "ambassadors", to ensure that they are armed with the mind opening facts necessary to change perceptions about South Africa. The IMC also printed, at the request of South African Airways (SAA), 100 000 copies. This was distributed on all SAA flights on Freedom Day, 27 April 2004 and the week following. This project has enabled the IMC to reach a far wider target audience.

(ii) Key tools

Since the inception of the IMC, a number of key tools have been developed. These are:

  1. Communication Resource Centre (CRC): This state-of-the-art centre was established in April 2002 with the aim of enhancing communication with key stakeholders, in order to promote and maintain the integrity of the South African brand. The CRC monitors international media mentions of South Africa and tracks the uptake of the "Brand South Africa" message.
  2. Information Resource Centre (IRC): This centre was established as a management tool to address the IMC’s knowledge management challenges. The IRC provides a content repository facility, which aids the IMC in identifying, capturing, customising and disseminating evidence of the country’s core brand essence, "Alive with Possibilities". Towards the end of the year under review, the IRC was incorporated into the CRC.
  3. Brand definition: The first major step was to develop the "Brand South Africa" campaign. South Africa’s brand definition provides the template against which to measure all communications, and forms the basis for the IMC’s strategy in selling South Africa to the world.
  4. National web portal: The IMC’s ofiicial web portal (www.southafrica.info) was launched in 2002. The portal was created to provide a leading, one-stop portal aimed at marketing South Africa and providing comprehensive, up-to-date country information. Since its launch, traffic to the portal has increased from 67 000 to 695 000 in march 2004.

Other (ambitious) marketing tools (for the future) include:

(iii) The road ahead

The IMC plans to:

The IMC is also in the process of recruiting the necessary staff to enable it to function optimally.

3.2.1 Questions and issues of concern raised by the Committee

  1. How much money was misappropriated with regard to the fraud case?
  2. Do the IMC have internal audit mechanisms?
  3. Do the IMC target the deaf with its television advertisements?
  4. Can the South African brand be associated with an image, such as the kangaroo of Australia, or a one-text word?
  5. How many South Africa citizens are supporting "Brand South Africa"?
  6. What are the linkages between the "Proudly South Africa" and other similar campaigns, and the campaigns run by the IMC?
  7. To what extent is the IMC influencing other South African campaigns?
  8. How many direct or indirect jobs have been created by the IMC’s campaigns?

 

 

 

 

3.2.2 Response by the IMC

  1. The money misappropriated amounts to R690 000.
  2. The IMC share an internal auditing company with the GCIS and an Internal Auditing Committee has been established. The fraud happened at the establishment stages of the IMC and the IMC only discovered the fraud at a late stage. Since then HR, Procurement and Financial policies have been put in place to ensure that further incidents do not happen, as well as ensuring that the IMC conforms to the requirements of the PFMA.
  3. The IMC does not have an approach yet to reaching the deaf with the television advertising campaigns. It is a weakness, which will be investigated by the IMC.
  4. Symbolic branding is a key challenge. However, a more pressing challenge for the IMC is to embed positive South Africa thoughts in the minds of the world. This is done through various advertisement campaigns, which the IMC is hoping will create a catalyst to others to spread the word about South Africa.
  5. Although marketing surveys have been used to ascertain how many people support "Brand South Africa", it is very difficult to ascertain the extent to which the campaigns have made an impact. Although 80% of the South African population has been reached by the campaigns, local attitudes and perceptions towards South Africa has not changed to an extent where everyone is positive about South Africa. Surveys will be conducted later in the year to re-assess the shift of attitudes and perceptions, if indeed there has been a shift.
  6. Unfortunately, the IMC is not doing enough to cement ties with the campaign drivers of the "Proudly South African" campaign due to a shortage of staff.
  7. The IMC is trying to create linkages with other campaign drivers such as provincial trade and investment bodies. The IMC has also identified key integration points such as tourism, which should adopt the "Brand South Africa" campaign and hopefully this will filter down to others.
  8. It is difficult to ascertain or claim that the IMC contributed to any job creation. What the IMC is doing, is to raise the image of South Africa and to say that South Africa is a country to invest in, which in turn will lead to job creation.

 

 

3.3 Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA)

The vision of the MDDA (hereinafter referred to as "the Agency") is to ensure that each and every South African citizen should have access to a choice of a diverse range of media.

The MDDA is a development agency that will assist in building an environment where a diverse, vibrant and creative media flourishes and reflects the needs of all South Africans.

(i) History of the MDDA

(ii) Highlights

  1. Establishing the Agency: All internal systems and policies in line with the PFMA have been finalised. The Agency also managed to achieve their commitment to prudent financial expenditure on administration. Whilst the regulations specify that the Agency should spend up to 35% of the budget on administration in the first year, the Agency have managed to spend under 27% of income on operational costs.
  2. Developing regulations to determine criteria and other support: In terms of the MDDA Act, the Agency must:

According to the regulations, at least 60% of grant money available will go to community media (print or electronic) projects, 25% to small commercial media and 5% to research projects. The regulations further capped administration costs to 35% in the first year and 25% thereafter.

  1. Researching the needs: In April 2003, the Agency commissioned research (to the HSRC and Mediaworks) into the status of the community and small commercial media sector (both in print and radio) and the challenges faced.

The key research findings include:

It has thus become apparent that the Agency needs to map out gaps in coverage of public and commercial operators to determine those areas where little or no other media exists. This is being done together with the Department of Communications (DoC).

  1. Strategising for success: In December 2003, the Agency developed a Strategic Plan, determining its plans, and detailing funding principles as well as the grant-making cycle which Agency utilises to ensure efficiency.
  2. The Strategic Plan outlines priorities for support and identifies what the Agency will and won’t be able to fund (given the resources available to it). These guidelines will be reviewed regularly taking into consideration the needs of the sector, analysis of the impact of the Agency on media development and diversity and funds available.

    In line with this, and in order to ensure a fair and transparent decision-making process, the Agency has developed a grant-making tool kit, including templates for assessing applications, contracting partners and monitoring and evaluation tools.

  3. Disbursing funds: The first call for applications was issued in November 2003. The deadline for proposals was at the beginning of January. A total of 27 applications were received. At the end of January the MDDA Board made decisions on which projects to support, and the MDDA Board made further decisions on applications on April 29 2004.

 

 

 

The Agency will be/are supporting 19 projects, totalling R3.6 million. These are:

 

A further two projects have received in principle approval pending clarification of their needs and the Agency is awaiting further information from another five media entities. A total of 24 applications have been refused, primarily either as they came from unlicensed radio stations or because they did not meet the criteria in the regulations. The Agency attempts to give detailed reasons for any refusal so that projects can if possible correct any problems and reapply.

The total amount granted so far amounts to just over R3.6 million. Altogether, the Agency has been asked for close to R40 million with some individual projects asking for as much as R5 million. Through the application process the Agency works together with applicants to fine-tune their priorities. The average grant provided amounts to approximately R200 000.

One of the objectives set by the MDDA Board in its first year of operation, was to collect the funds pledged by broadcasting and print stakeholders to the Agency in terms of Memorandum of Understandings (MoU’s) with the Minister in the Presidency. According to these MoU’s, the major print and broadcasting entities agreed to support the MDDA for five years.

The Board was tasked with the responsibility of converting these into funding agreements. Funding partners wanted to see the regulations prior to discussing any such agreements. The Board thus started negotiations on draft Funding Agreements in November 2003.

The Agency is pleased to say that it has concluded these discussions with the print partners and the agreement is currently being signed. The Agency is saddened, however, at the possible loss of the NAIL contribution due to the sale of their media assets.

The Agency is currently in discussions with the different broadcasters, and is truly grateful for the support and commitment of the commercial and public sector media partners to the partnership.

(iv) Other support

The Agency is also tasked with providing indirect support, including leveraging resources. Whilst, during the year under review, the focus was on setting up the Agency and developing the framework for disbursement of grants, the following were also achieved.

  1. Marketing workshops: The Advertising Media Association of South Africa (AMASA) and the Advertising Media Forum (AMF) have agreed to partner the Agency in hosting workshops on marketing for small commercial and community media. The first of these workshops will be held in Johannesburg in July 2004, with others held later this year in Cape Town and Durban. This is the first time that organisations such as the AMF and AMASA have participated so actively in providing such support to the sector. This can be seen as the beginning of the process of addressing difficulties the sector faces in attracting advertising.
  2. Leveraging support: The Agency successfully intervened with the South African Revenue Services (SARS) on behalf of a Johannesburg based community radio station to prevent the station from being closed down. The station was in arrears with its tax payments they appealed to the Agency for assistance. SARS, at very short notice, provided more time to the station to develop a plan to pay back the money owed.
  3. Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICSASA): The Agency and ICASA have agreed to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding in order to ensure cooperation, where possible, to achieve ICASA’s and the Agency’s mandates of increasing diversity in the electronic media. ICASA has agreed to inform the Agency timeously when it will be issuing new licences so that the Agency can inform and assist community radio stations.
  4. Department of Communications (DoC): The DoC, amongst other things, provides support to install equipment in community radio stations around South Africa. The Agency and the DoC have agreed to have ongoing discussions to ensure that the two do not duplicate activities in order to ensure maximum impact in the use of public funds to support the sector. The DoC has further agreed to include the Agency on any committees evaluating applications for studio equipment.

(v) Future priorities

The emphasis in the current financial year (2004-2005) will be on implementing and streamlining the Agency’s systems and policies to ensure efficient distribution of funds and support. In subsequent years the Agency plan to focus on addressing environmental problems proactively.

The Agency’s strategic plan has have been guided by the MDDA Act, the research that have been conducted, learnings from other grant makers (including the Open Society Foundation and the DoC), and the resources available to the Agency.

The Agency has received R7 million from Government for this financial year. Further, in terms of the funding agreements with major print and broadcasting stakeholders the Agency project a further income of up to R9m, resulting in an overall budget of about R16 million. The Agency has developed an operational plan outlining activities that would assist it in reaching its strategic goals.

These are defined in a business plan, of which the following priorities are highlighted:

  1. Continued support for community and small commercial media projects: This is one of the key objectives of the MDDA Act.

  1. Indirect Support/Leveraging Support

  1. Partnerships

  1. More resources: The Agency will focus throughout the next three years on garnering additional financial support for it. In this regard, the Agency has already begun developing an investment strategy with the aim of hopefully eventually covering its administration costs through interest earned. This year the Agency will commence with trying to garner additional financial support from international donors.
  2. Mentors: The Agency has started with the process of developing a database of mentors. The Agency made a public call for organisations and individuals to submit their names it for inclusion on this database. It is envisaged that it will include people and/or organisations with a range of skills such as audience research, journalism, financial management, and organisational development, community participation etc. Such mentors will assist projects in developing plans for sustainability and in enhancing their performance and corporate governance structures.
  3. Communication: The MDDA Act defines two areas of communication, which is of utmost importance to the Agency. These are (1) the raising public awareness about media development and diversity, and (2) ensuring the Agency’s activities are known to the public. Both are critical to the successful implementation of the Agency’s mandate of developing a diverse media responsive to the needs of all South Africans.

The have currently communicated about its programmes using existing media and other networks. The Agency want to progressively expand this, balancing the need to communicate broadly, its approach of prioritising rural and underserved communities and the resources available to it.

The Agency has therefore decided to target communication strategically, focusing on those areas where there is currently little or no media, whilst continuing to work with existing media networks and other community structures to ensure the ’s activities are known. The Agency will utilise the SABC public radio stations to assist in distributing information.

3.3.1 Questions and issues of concern raised by the Committee

  1. The reported a loss of R454 000 in its Business Plan. What was the cause of the lost? Is this loss due to theft?
  2. How are beneficiaries of seed funding identified to ensure that all get equal funding?
  3. Have any seed funding been used to sort out licensing issues with ICASA?
  4. How can Members of Parliament be used to advertise to programmes/work of the MDDA?
  5. How does the MDDA communicate with/to the deaf?
  6. Does the MDDA have monitoring mechanisms regarding programmes that are rolled out or projects it is funding?
  7. To what extent do resources filter down to community radio stations?
  8. To what extent is the MDDA responding to the skills shortage in the media industry?
  9. Can the MDDA influence the content of community radio stations?

3.3.2 Response by the MDDA

  1. The deficit/loss in the budget is not due to any fraud. It is a technical deficit because the financial year only starts at end (31) March and by then the budget for the MDDA has been finalised.
  2. The Agency is currently not distributing any seed funding to community radio stations without a license. The Agency liaises with ICASA to ensure community radio stations are informed about when ICASA will be issuing licenses. ICASA will be issuing licenses again in 2007.
  3. When the process for the distribution of seed funding commences, the Agency will be guided by its general criteria for funding. Seed funding will be small amounts.
  4. Members of Parliament should inform communities in their constituencies about the Agency and should also inform the Agency when a community applies for funding.
  5. The Agency has as yet no informed approach to advertising the services of the Agency to the deaf community. The Agency thus need to be proactive and should seek advice from disable communities on how to formulate an approach.
  6. The Agency uses to a large extend its site visits to the various projects it funds to monitor progress. The Agency has also taken guidance from its grant-funders in that it (MMDA) has built into its contracts a mechanism to check how beneficiaries are spending their funds.
  7. The Agency has, in terms of the MDDA Act and other policies, an obligations towards "under serviced" areas. The Agency, together with the DoC, are trying to map out what kind of media services are received in the communities to ensure that media resources filters down to everyone.
  8. Capacity-building is a serious issue to the Agency. The Agency is addressing this through the media SETA and other means. A concrete plan on how to deal with skill shortages will be formulated and forwarded to the Committee.
  9. The Agency cannot influence the content of the community media, including the community radio stations.

 

 

4. Conclusion

The Chairperson of the Committee thanked GCIS, the IMC, and the MDDA for their well-presented and informative presentations.