SOUTH AFRICAN HERITAGE RESOURCES AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN
APRIL 2004 -and 31 MARCH 2007


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

1. PREFACE

3

1.1 Forward by the Chairperson of the Board

3

1.2 Introduction by the Director / CEO

3 - 4

1.3 Vision and Mission

5

1.4 Overview of past performance and spending trends

6 - 7

1.5 Institutional values

8

 

 

2. STRATEGIC DIRECTION - MEDIUM TERM STRATEGY

9

2.1 Key objectives

9

2.2 Funding requirements per key objective

9 - 13

2.3 Capital investment strategy

13

2.4 Reserves

14

 

 

3. ORGANISATIONAL MANAGEMENT

15

3.1 Human resource strategy

15

3.2 Employment Equity programme

16

3.3 Information technology resource strategy

16

 

 


1. PREFACE

Foreword by Chairperson of the Council:

The management and conservation of cultural heritage in South Africa faces an exciting future, as the South African Heritage Resources Agency explores the challenges of the new heritage legislation, the National Heritage Resources Act (No 25 of 1999). This Act, which represents a South African synthesis of the best current heritage conservation practice from around the world, requires of SAHRA a new vision for heritage management: a vision which is inclusive and representative in its approach, and which will encourage the participation of all South Africans in the identification and management of our common cultural heritage.


The new legislation also places substantial additional responsibilities upon SAHRA, and the challenge will be to develop the capacity and resources to meet these responsibilities in partnership with others in the heritage sector and Government. SAHRA is eager to embark on the important process of developing a new ethos and practice for cultural heritage management in South Africa, and the Strategic Plan which follows should be viewed as a phase of this critically important process.


1.2 Introduction by Director / Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

Since the National Heritage Resources Act, 25, 1999 came into effect on 1 April 2000, the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) has been interpreting and reinterpreting the Act to identify key transformation and implementation areas and the best process to follow. Significant progress has been made within the organisation and externally. The organization has decentralized its services and established service centers in all the provinces. These centers service provincial governments, provincial heritage resources authorities, local authorities, heritage organizations and the general public and facilitate their understanding of their respective roles in the management of heritage resources.

Seven of the nine provincial governments have established provincial heritage resources authorities. Although these authorities lack the necessary capacity and resources to perform their responsibilities, their existence facilitates cooperative management, implementation of the Act, coordination and delivery of the Mission of SAHRA. Four of them have entered into formal arrangements that SAHRA can perform provincial functions that they cannot perform because they lack capacity.

A number of heritage resources have been identified within the previously neglected areas and provinces and they have been graded to assign the responsibility for their management to the relevant authorities. These resources and sites include World Heritage Sites such as Mapungubwe and Makapan Valley in Limpopo and the site of the capture of Mr N R Mandela in KwaZulu-Natal.

In addition to resources and sites that have been identified through the normal procedure, some resources have been discovered accidentally. A case in point is the discovery of human remains in Cape Town in what may have been a 300 year old burial ground. This discovery has aroused a web of challenges regarding the management of heritage resources and social, cultural, political and economic development. The need to balance heritage protection and development remains a major transformation challenge.


SAHRA continues to broaden the scope of heritage resource management beyond the visible and tangible. Intangible cultural heritage resources are gaining recognition as an integral part of the tangible as well as being heritage resources in their own right. Having participated in the establishment of the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in 2003, SAHRA contributed and gained sustainable understanding of the sector and is ready to implement effective programmes to protect, conserve and promote the rich intangible cultural heritage of South Africans. In addition, SAHRA will engage museums and other heritage institutions in reinterpreting objects and artifacts in a meaningful way that regenerates, develops and preserves the identity of the diverse South African nation.

SAHRA commits itself to building a sustainable system of managing the heritage resources of the democratic South African nation, hence its Vision, Mission, Objects and Policies.

1.3 Vision and Mission

VISION

SAHRA’s vision is to provide for the identification, conservation, protection and promotion of our heritage resources for present and future generations.

MISSION

As custodians of our national estate our mission is:

To coordinate and monitor the identification of our national heritage resources;
To set norms and standards and maintain the management of heritage resources nationally;
To encourage cooperative conservation of our national estate;
To enable and facilitate the development of provincial structures;
To control export and import of nationally significant heritage resources;
To develop policy initiative on the promotion and management of our heritage;
To nurture a holistic celebration of our history;
To set national policy for heritage resources management, ie formal protection, general protection and management; and
To develop an integrated and interactive system for the management of national heritage resources.

1.4 Overview of past performance and spending trends

Income and Expenditure over the last 4 years is reflected in the table below.

INCOME

2000/01
Audited
R’000

2001/2002
Audited
R’000

2002/2003
Audited
R’000

2003/2004MTEF Baseline
(preliminary outcome)
R’000

(a) State contribution

9 718

12 905

14 254

15 160

(b) Fundraising and marketing

 

 

 

 

(c) Business ventures

 

 

 

 

(d) Contract: income

196

491

398

510

(e) Investment: income

578

598

490

848

(f) Sales of Services

 

 

 

 

Total

10 492

13 994

15 142

16 518

EXPENDITURE

2000/01
Audited
R’000

2001/2002
Audited
R’000

2002/03
Audited
R’000

2003/04 MTEF Baseline
(preliminary outcome)
R’000

(a) Support functions

 

 

 

 

(b) Collection and Collections Management

 

 

 

 

(c) Conservation / Curation

7 679

11 591

15 920

13 401

(d) Curation and Research

 

 

 

 

(e) Publications and Audiovisual

 

 

 

 

(f) Exhibitions

 

 

 

 

(g) Research and Development

 

 

 

 

(h) Education and Public Programmes

 

 

 

 

(i) Capital projects (NHRF w.e.f. 2000/01)

392

430

547

4 617

(i) Transformation

1 909

690

0

0

Total

9 980

12711

16 467

18 018

Surplus/Deficit

512

1 283

(1325)

(1 500)



Income and Expenditure trends


The State contribution remained constant at around R6.6m for the last years of the NMC’s existence, but with annual increases in July of each year for ICS.
SAHRA came into existence on 1 April 2000 and was given an additional transformation budget of R2.775m in 2000/01 and R4.2m in 2001/02.
These funds were earmarked for specific once -off transformation related expenditure to convert the NMC into SAHRA and to place SAHRA in a position to begin to implement the National Heritage Resources Act of 1999.
In 2001/02 SAHRA received for the first time an additional R2.088m in respect of transfer payments to six monuments (now called heritage institutions) which were previously funded directly by DACST

Institutional values

SAHRA LOGO

A new logo has been designed and launched which embodies SAHRA’s vision to protect South Africa’s rich and diverse cultural heritage resources.

SAHRA’s VALUES

a holistic approach to heritage resources management

systematic strategic planning, monitoring and evaluation

performance-based planning of programmes and resources

networks, partnerships, exchanges and cooperative governance

passion, creativity, re-skilling and commitment

business principles applicable to heritage management

people-centred service

delivering quality and value for money service

accountability


2. STRATEGIC DIRECTION - MEDIUM TERM STRATEGY

2.1 Key objectives

The institution will pursue the achievement of the following key objectives

Providing for the cooperative and effective management of the national estate

Setting national policies, norms and standards for heritage management

Implementing programmes to facilitate identification, conservation, development and promotion
of all heritage resources

Coordination, Monitoring and Evaluation

Managing World Heritage Sites


COST DRIVERS

Key objective

Strategy

Output

Service delivery indicators

Service delivery target or milestones

1. Cooperative and effective management

AWARENESS

*Seminar/workshop,
*Conference,
*Colloquia, *Exhibition
* Festival

Increased number of people aware and understanding principles of heritage resources management and participating effectively in it

Increase No. of identified resources by at least 5%

All identified sites having Conservation Management Plans

Increased publicity of major resources and sites

national sites At least two major per province

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


1.2Capacity-building

Human resources




Development

Organisation
/institution development




Improved
Professionalism
Internally and externally




More effective organizations and institutions




At least one heritage management org per province.














A management structure per identified site







Organisations registered with SAHRA, evaluated and publicised







All programme managers of SAHRA trained in programme manageme.


At least one nine organization trained in programme management

 

  • Public Participation
    Sites
    Objects
    Intangible cultural heritage resources
    Graves
    Ship wrecks


Community & orgs effectively participating in identification, conservation and management

Effective participation in management of heritage resources and sites









More resources identified and declared if necessary

 



At least two national sites declared in each province.

Graves and burial grounds of victims in the struggle must be identified by 31/12/2004 and managed effectively






Coordination,
Monitoring & Evaluation


Established and Strengthened
*Provincial Heritage Resources Authorities (PHRA)

* Local Authorities
Heritage Institutions e.g.museums, archives



*Government Departments

*Heritage Organisations


*Community-Based Organisations



All PHRAs assessed and functional




All Metropolitan Municipalities assessed and functional



Role of each government department established and Agreements drawn

Role clarification and Agreements



All PHRA listed with treasury (PFMA) have offices, equipment, bank accounts

All Metropolitan Council create heritage departments


All Department establish registers of heritage resources and sites under their ownership and care



All former National monuments re-assessed and graded I/II/III


Agreements between PHRAs and Local Authorities on heritage resources management



PHRAs established heritage registers



Heritage Registers


And


National Inventory

World Heritage Sites

  • Identification
    Management Plans
    Consultation
    Listing with UNESCO
    Management

Researched submissions to SAHRA Council before submission to Environmental Affairs and Tourism

Research reports and declared national sites

Systematic listing in the order national site then international or world heritage site

The four existing sites declared national heritage sites

 



Fundraising and marketing

Key objective

Strategy

Output

Service delivery indicator

Service delivery target or milestones

Raise funding status

Motivation for realistic budget to the Executive Authority

Specific programme funding proposals submitted to Lotteries Board and Private sector

Project partnerships with international organizations such as World Heritage Centre, ICCROM

At least R11 million in 2004/5






At least one project per annum funded externally

Increased funding

R11 million


Business Ventures

Key objective

Strategy

Output

Service delivery indicator

Service delivery target or milestones

Sustainable management of heritage resources and sites

Entry fees to national sites

Revenue generation

Revenue generation

At least R10 per visitor

 

Interpretive center to incorporate publications for sale

 

 

At least two publications per annum


Investment Income

Key objective

Strategy

Output

Service delivery indicator

Service delivery target or milestones

Fixed property

Imrove state of existing properties and rent them out at reasonable levels

Income generated

Self suatining property

All properties maintained and rented out at reasonable income levels


The institution will pursue the achievement of the following key objectives: Expenditure

Support Functions

Key objective

Strategy

Output

Service delivery indicator

Service delivery target or milestones

Strong administrative foundation and operative systems

Training, draft policies and implement effective systems

Efficient and smooth functioning support services

Filing system

Systematic and effective admin support

 

 

 

 

 

Maintain specialized library

Re-evaluate policy to purchase appropriate books

Library more accessible for researchers and staff and well equipped.

 

 

Maintain database and website

Capture appropriate data and user friendly access to information

Greater awareness and educational tool

 

 


Collection and Collection Management

Key objective

Strategy

Output

Service delivery indicator

Service delivery target or milestones

Holistic and accurate re-interpretation of collections

Intensified research involving relevant people and communities

All collections and single artefacts interpreted in relevant languages and displayed appropriately

Adequate and accessible displays

 


Conservation / Curation

Key objective

Strategy

Output

Service delivery indicator

Service delivery target or milestones

Effective curation of collections

Enter into agreements with museums and repositories on conservation, display and management of heritage objects

Will conserved collection serving educational needs

Meeting minimum education in standards of conservation management of collection meaning of heritage objects.

Agreements with all repositories

 

Monitor and evaluate management of collections

Evaluation reports and correction measures

 

Annual reporting on management of artifacts and collections

 

 

 

 

 

Funding requirements per key objective

Key objective

2004/2005
R'000

2005/2006
R'000

2006/2007
R'000

INCOME

 

 

 

(a) State Contribution

32 213

33 195

33 195

(b) Fundraising and marketing

 

 

 

(c) Business ventures

 

 

 

(d) Contract Income

367

367

367

(e) Investment Income

490

490

490

(f) Sales of Services

 

 

 

Total

33 070

34 052

34 052

 

 

 

 

EXPENDITURE

 

 

 

(a) Support functions

 

 

 

(b) Collection and Collections Management

 

 

 

(c) Conservation / Curation

20 452

21 434

21 434

(d) Curation and Research

 

 

 

(e) Publications and Audiovisual

 

 

 

(f) Exhibitions

 

 

 

(g) Research and Development

 

 

 

(h) Education and Public Programmes

 

 

 

(i) Capital projects

12 618

12 618

12 618

(j) Transformation

 

 

 

Total

33 070

34 052

34 052

Surplus / Deficit

NIL

NIL

NIL


2.3 Capital investments requests

Buildings

2004/2005
R'000

2005/2006
R'000

2006/2007
R'000

Major Capital Works *

0

0

0

Repairs and Renovations

200

200

200

36 SAHRA owned properties valued at R50m

 

 

 

New Buildings

0

0

0

TOTAL

200

200

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


2.4 Reserves

Sources

1999/00

2000/01

2001/2002

2002/2003

2003/2004

2004/2005

2005/2006

2006/2007

Accumulated fund

2 305

718

2 196

872

0

0

0

0

Contingency fund

1793

2 180

1 979

1 979

1 416

0

0

0

Staff benefit fund

350

1 346

1 346

1 346

1 346

0

0

0

Motor vehicle fund

60

260

65

65

0

0

0

0

Housing guarantee fund

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

4 508

4 504

5 586

4 262

2 762

0

0

0


3. ORGANISATIONAL MANAGEMENT


3.1 Human resource strategy 2003/2004 to 2006/2007

PURPOSE OF HUMAN RESOURCE STRATEGY


Align policies with labour legislation
Achieve workplace equity
Employ staff for specialized functions
Staff development programmes

STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE OBJECTIVES


Well skilled staff
Fairly remunerated workforce
Performance evaluation system
Improved conditions of service

3.2 Employment Equity programme

RACE AND GENDER REPRESENTIVITY

POST LEVEL

FILLED

AFRICAN

COLOURED

INDIAN

WHITE

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

Management

1

1

1

Middle management and high level specialists

4

1

1

4

1

Supervisor and high level skilled/clerical

7

2

3

2

1

4

Lower level skilled/clerical

8

2

3

1

3

Very low skilled

1

2

TOTAL

53

12

13

8

6

1

0

5

8

25

14

1

13


3.2.1 Special initiatives to promote affirmative action

Training and re-skilling existing staff
All funded vacant posts advertised and filled

3.3 Information technology resource strategy

SAHRA has to comply with the National Heritage Resources Act which stipulates that a national database should be maintained and information reflecting the national estate be accessible to the public. The database will require a large annual commitment for several years in order to get it optimum functioning levels. A web site should also be maintained. Software and hardware would be regularly upgraded for the introduction of GIS and to ensure that SAHRA meets the requirements of the Act.