Report of Ad Hoc Committee on Trade and Industry on Vote 32 of the 2004/5 Budget:

Trade and Industry

The Committee has examined the budget of the Department of Trade and Industry (Vote 32) for the 2004/5 financial year and the forward estimates for 2005/6 and 2006/7 included in the Estimates of National Expenditure 2004, as well as the Department’s Medium Term Strategic Plan 2004/5-2006/7, and reports as follows:

The main features of the 2004/5 budget are:

The Department provided the Committee with a report of highlights of key outputs delivered in the past financial year. These included:

A more comprehensive report on the Department’s performance against the output targets in the 2003/4 budget will be provided in the Department’s Annual Report, which the Ad Hoc Committee recommends be the subject of detailed engagement by its successor committee.

The Committee also received a report on output targets for 2004/5. These include a number of detailed targets aimed at increasing the contribution of small enterprises to the economy, advancing broad based Black Economic Empowerment, raising levels of investment, increasing market access opportunities for South African enterprises, building skills, technology and infrastructure and generally improving the performance and capacity of the DTI in all areas. A feature of output targets this year is the identification of "flagship projects", which we were told were "non-negotiables" that needed to be delivered on as identified before the end of the financial year. These included:

The Committee also had an opportunity to engage on budgetary issues with four of the COTI institutions. Highlights of these discussions included:

 

 

 

The South African Bureau of Standards (SABS)

Khula Enterprise Finance

Ntsika Enterprise Promotion Agency

The Industrial Development Corporation (IDC)

Comments

The Committee is pleased to report continued progress in the management, presentation, and reporting on the DTI’s budget. A Department once known for its significant underspending and large roll overs, is now a Department that spends almost all of the funds allocated to it by Parliament on the activities approved by Parliament. The Department’s Programmes are also now closely aligned to its major activities and financial control and reporting systems seem to be functioning effectively. In addition, the Committee received a report indicating that the Department had delivered on a number of key output targets identified in the 2003/4 budget. However, as indicated above, the Committee did not receive a full, comprehensive report on its performance against last year’s output targets. That we are told will be provided in the Department’s annual report due out later in the year. Monitoring this will be one of the key oversight activities, which we recommend should become a matter of routine for the Committee that succeeds this Ad Hoc Committee.

As also indicated above, the Department reported that it was in the process of finalizing a mechanism to measure the impact of its programmes on the economy – in other words to measure the extent to which its outputs contribute to the achievement of its outcome targets. This, too, needs to be interrogated and engaged with as an important tool of Parliamentary oversight.

While the Committee found that in general there was improved delivery in 2003/4 on the output targets identified, a few matters of concern were identified. These include:

It is our earnest hope that the merger of Ntsika and NAMAC (whose programmes while limited in scope have often been relatively effective) will provide the basis for a more effective diagnostic and mentoring/incubation service for small business. The Ad Hoc Committee recommends that this is an issue that its successor needs to remain seized of.

The Committee notes that the fall of in the value of Khula guarantees through the banks contrasts with commitments made by the banks at the Financial Sector Summit to increase funding of SMMEs. Again this is an issue that needs to be followed up.

The challenge of responding to the needs of persons in the "second economy" by creating new opportunities for higher quality sustainable livelihoods, has been identified by the President and Government as priorities. Many of the structures we interrogated have at least tacitly acknowledged that many of their existing products and services are not adequately structured to respond to the challenges of transforming the "second economy". The Committee notes that identifying options to improve service delivery to persons in the "second economy" is one of the "flagship", non-negotiable output targets for the 2004/5 financial year. We note, too, that several other "flagship" commitments, including making the first disbursements from the Apex fund and implementing a cooperatives development strategy, are also targeted at persons in the "second economy". The Committee welcomes these new focuses, as well as the commitment to begin to implement the broad based BEE strategy, and believes that engaging with these issues will need to guide much of the work of Parliamentary oversight in the years ahead.