BLACK MANAGEMENT FORUM (BMF)

REVIEW OF THE 2003 BEE STRATEGY AND LEGISLATION

SUBMISSION OF THE BLACK MANAGEMENT FORUM (BMF) TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INDUSTRIES, 24 & 25 MAY 2003

 

1. INTRODUCTION

The idea of a strategy for broad based economic empowerment was initially put forward by the Black Economic Empowerment Commission (BEE Com). The Commission was established to address the problem of non-participation of the majority of South Africans in the economy. The idea of the Commission arose out of a resolution taken at the BMF national conference in November 1997. The Commission was subsequently established in 1998 under the auspices of the Black Business Council (BBC). The BEE Com had the mandate of redefining the concept of empowerment, investigate the state of empowerment, identify the hurdles to empowerment and recommend a policy to the government. The Commission presented its final report to government in June 2001.

The Bee Com report had the following key recommendations:

After much debate, the government empowerment strategy document was made final at this year’s January Cabinet Lekgotla and announced by the Minister of Trade and Industry in March 2003. The final document has departed from recommendations made by the BEE Commission, where government favours self-regulation and sector specific targets. Government’s approach has been to situate black economic empowerment within the context of a broader national empowerment strategy that focused on historically disadvantaged people, and particularly black people, women, youth, the disabled and rural communities.

2. THE STRATEGY

Key Components of the Strategy

The government BEE strategy has three main components namely:

Balance Score Card and BEE Charters

Government is of the view that in order to achieve BEE objectives the country needs a consistent approach, appropriately flexible to respond to different economic and enterprise conditions and the ability to measure progress. Government will use a scorecard to measure progress by enterprises and where sector specific are developed, the terms set out in those charters will apply.

The scorecard will measure three core elements of BEE, namely:

Another instrument that government is planning to employ in trying to ensure that empowerment objectives are met is the use of sector specific and enterprise tailored charters. The charters are meant to be collaborative efforts between stakeholders from government, the private sector and labour. Charters are aimed at building some level of understanding, agreement on program interventions and support for implementation. These charters will also have targets that each sector or enterprise has agreed upon.

3. BEE ADVISORY COUNCIL

The BEE Council as stipulated in the Strategy will be established in terms of the broad base BEE Bill. The constitution of the Council will be determined by the Minister of Trade and Industry and will not be incorporated in the Act. The Council will comprise 19 members appointed by the State President and drawn from business, government, civil society and other stakeholders

The Council will advise the State President on BEE and will carry out the following functions:

4. PENDING BEE LEGISLATION

The draft broad based BEE Bill has the following objectives:

The purpose of the Act will be to:

Codes of practice

The Minister (of Trade and Industry) will have the power to issue codes of practice on BEE that may include the following:

Transformation Charters

The Minister has the power to promote and publish transformation charters, which have been developed and agreed by major stakeholders in that sector, including organised business, organised labour and relevant government departments.

The Advisory Council

5. BMF VIEW ON THE STRATEGY AND BEE BILL

    1. Powers of the Minister – Too much power has been granted to the Minister, ranging from issuing codes of practice to publishing transformation charters. The issuing of the codes of good practice should be vested with the advisory Council rather than the Minister.
    2. Equity and Skills Development – The advancement of equity and linking it to skills development should be made an explicit code of good practice in underscoring the importance of creating equal opportunities for all. Skills development was also prioritised in the agreement of the Growth and Development Summit.
    3. Scorecard and Targets – The BMF supports the notion of sector or enterprise specific charters that would be voluntarily established. However, the targets that sectors or enterprises set for themselves should be linked to the scorecard and be included in the proposed codes of practice. This would make the scorecard a meaningful measurement tool in gauging commitment to BEE.
    4. Advisory Council – Its functions should be more than ‘review’ and ‘advice’. The Council should have the mandate of monitoring the implementation and compliance with BEE across enterprises and industries.
    5. Reporting System – The Bill should incorporate an independently established reporting system to gauge commitment to BEE. As it stands, the Bill proposes a code of practice for reporting by organs of state and employers. This should not be left to the discretion of these entities.
    6. Penalties - The draft Bill does not state what will happen in the event that an enterprise chooses not to comply with the strategy or fails to attain targets set in the charter. This is a conspicuous omission, which needs to be addressed. It should be noted that for the public sector, government has said it will apply commercial penalties for non-compliance, eg losing or be refused a contract.

 

Mxolisi Lindie, Director: Business and Policy Desk,

BMF