DRAFT 1: Monday, 9 June 2003
Report of the Portfolio Committee on Provincial and Local Government on Budget Vote 5: Provincial and Local Government, Dated 10 June 2003
The Portfolio Committee on Provincial and Local Government, having considered Budget Vote 5: Provincial and Local Government, reports as follow:
A. Introduction
1. The budget review of the Ministry and the Department of Provincial and Local Government was undertaken from 10 to 14 March and on 3 June 2003. As a precursor to the review, a workshop was held with the Department on 19 February to consider the strategic plan and programmes of the Department.
3. SALGA (South African Local Government Association, was represented by its Chairperson, Father S Mkhatshwa; Treasurer, M J Mokoena; Chief Executive Officer, Mr T Mokwena; Councillors Mr S Somyo, Mr D Masemola, Ms N Dube and Ms N Mayathula-Khoza; Director of Policy and Strategy, Mr M Soni, and Director of Programmes, Ms J Sibisi. The National House of Traditional Leaders was represented by its Chairperson, Inkosi M.B Mzimela; Members Kgosi S V Suping, Morena M F Mopeli and Khosi F P Kutama; Chief Executive, Mr M Gobe; and Senior Planner Mr ZM Matebese. The delegation from MIIU (Municipal Infrastructure Investment Unit) consisted of the Chairperson, Ms M Hesketh; Chief Executive Officer, Ms K Pearce; Director, Ms N Mjoli-Mncube; Financial Operations Manager, Mr J Lesaoane; Project Managers, Ms D Magagumela, Ms J Levister; Business Development manager, Ms A Bassa; and Municipal Infrastructure Specialist, Mr J Leighland. The Municipal Demarcation Board was represented by Chief Executive Officer, Mr H Monare and the Head of Research and Implementation, Mr R Willemse. The Local Government Water Sector Education and Training Authority (LGWSETA) was represented by Chairperson, Mr V Magagula; Leadership Manager, Mr S Mofokeng; and Communication Manager, Mr E Mnyakeng.
B. Political Overview of Budget
C. Overview of the Budget
1. Of the R6 579 638 000 overall budget for the 2002/03 financial year the Department spent 99,6%. R22 878 000 was unspent.
2. The most significant case of under-spending was R9 958 000 in respect of Auxiliary and Associated Services. The under-spending in this programme was due mainly to the R8 923 000 unspent allocation of the Commission for Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities. This is because the Commission will only be established in this financial year.
3. R9 399 001 000 has been allocated to the Ministry and Department of Provincial and Local Government for this financial year. This represent a nominal increase of about 43% compared to last year. The Ministry and Department’s budgets are expected to increase by 13% in 2004/05 and 9% in the 2005/06.
4. There has been a nominal increase of about 60% in local government’s "equitable share" from R3 963 614 000 to R6 343 478 000 this financial year. The increased funds are mainly to be directed to municipalities to improve their capacity to deliver quality services.
5. The Department is committed to focussing more on policy implementation as from this year. An allocation of R1 100 000 000 to municipalities will be utilised to provide free basic water and electricity. 3 million more people will have access to free basic water in 2002/03. 28 million people are targeted to have access to free basic electricity in 2003/04.
D. Administration
was appointed on 1 August 2002. The Committee congratulated her on her appointment and noted the effective manner in which she had assumed leadership of the Department.
2. The Department has decided to create units on:
E. Governance and Development
1. Intergovernmental Relations (IGR)
3. Consolidated Municipal Infrastructure Programme (CMIP)
R1 730 853 000 last year to R2 246 253 000 this year. The Department is aiming to benefit 650 000 additional households through CMIP. R309 000 000 from CMIP will be allocated to new investment, the rehabilitation and upgrading of basic infrastructure for local municipalities with budgets of larger than R200 000 000, of which
R43 996 000 will be allocated to local municipalities in which there are nodes. R1 400 000 000 will be allocated to new investment and the rehabilitation as well as upgrading of basic infrastructure for district municipalities of which R385 659 000 will be allocated to district municipalities that have nodes. R549 000 000 will be allocated to metropolitan municipalities. This amount is for new investment, rehabilitation and upgrading of basic infrastructure.
4. Local Economic Development and Social Plan Grant
1. The LED Fund will be allocated R120 000 000. It is expected that 3 000 temporary jobs will be created.
2. From the LED Fund, local municipalities will receive R94 100 000 in order to contribute to job creation and SMME development. Additionally, R26 700 000 of the LED Fund will be allocated to rural nodes in order to promote agriculture and tourism. The metropolitan municipalities will receive R9 200 000.
3. The Committee feels that the LED is vital and that the Department should assist municipalities more to put into effect LED programmes. Most municipalities attend to LED on an ad-hoc basis and do not locate it strategically. There needs to be a much more co-ordinated and focussed approach to LED.
5. Urban and Rural Nodes
1. R1 200 000 000 of chip funds will be allocated to rural projects. Of this R307 700 000 will be allocated to the 13 development nodes in 55 local municipalities.
2. Consideration is being given to introducing more nodes through
consultation with the President’s Office.
the criteria by which further nodes would be decided on and to get a better sense of the progress achieved so far. The Committee is to visit the nodes in the 2004/5 financial year. The Committee reiterates its request to the Minister to write to all the MPs living in the nodes or have constituency offices there to enlist their co-operation in monitoring progress and contributing to the more effective implementation of the programmes.
F. Institutional Reform and Support
1. Disaster management
1. R13 317 000 will be allocated to disaster management to enhance disaster preparedness and management capacity. The Department feels that this will improve human security and reduce the vulnerability of urban and rural communities to natural and human-made disasters.
2. The Department noted that the IDPs of a significant number of municipalities did not include disaster management plans and is to attend to this.
3. Given the magnitude of the challenges of disaster management in the country and the need to effectively implement the new model of disaster management, the committee feels that the budget allocated to disaster management is inadequate and needs to be increased appropriately next year. The Committee is also aware that many IDPs do not include disaster management plans and believes that the Ministry should draw this to the attention of the MEC’s for local government and SALGA to act upon.
2. Institutional Capacity Building and Support
2. While recognising short-term needs, the Department feels that there has to be long-term perspectives on capacity-building within the Department and in the provincial and local spheres of government.
3. The Department feels that the offices of the Premiers have a crucial role to play in coordinating capacity-building in the provinces.
4. The Department is seeking to consolidate all the grants for local government capacity-building, including the grants offered by National Treasury.
5. The Department explained that the creation of a single public service for all three spheres of government would also contribute to ensuring that capacity is more evenly spread across the spheres.
6. The majority in the committee welcome the move towards a single public service. The Democratic Alliance expressed its reservation about this.
7. The committee welcomes the merger of the local government capacity-building grants and support the view that all these grants should be co-ordinated by the Department.
8. The Committee feels that effective capacity-building and training is indispensable to the successful implementation of the new system of local government and to significant advances in delivery, development and democracy. The current programmes need to be reviewed to establish how effective they are. The Committee feels that new and more innovative courses and programmes need to be developed whose outcomes are more easy to evaluate.
9. The Committee reiterates its concern that there needs to be greater and more effective co-ordination and co-operation, within a commonly accepted framework, of all local government capacity-building and training role-players. As a contribution to that, the Committee will host a workshop of all relevant stakeholders on 14 May 2003.
3. Local Government Capacity Building Grant
G. Auxiliary and Associated Services
1. Commission on Claims and Disputes Relating to Traditional Leadership
2. South African Cities Network
1. The South African Cities Network sub-programme has been allocated R1 500 000 for the 2003/04 financial year. The Department explained that networks, engagements and partnerships would become increasingly important in governance and matters of local service delivery.
2. From the study tour of municipalities undertaken by the Portfolio Committee it emerged clearly that the "secondary" cities see themselves as "emerging metros" and expect to be constituted as metros by the time of the next local government elections. The Committee feels that the Ministry and Department need to engage with the "secondary "cities to address this matter.
H. South African Local Government Association (SALGA)
I. Municipal Infrastructure Investment Unit (MIIU)
R7 000 000 last year to R10 000 000 this year. Although the primary concern of MIIU is to draw private sector investment to municipalities, it is also interested in facilitating public-public partnerships. The MIIU is also increasingly interested in appropriately assisting in the implementation of CMIP. It has extended its programme to provide municipalities with training to negotiate contracts on services. The MIIU also has an increasing number of projects in smaller municipalities. The MIIU explained however that its projects are largely determined by demand, and there are budget constraints on how much it can do.
J. Municipal Demarcation Board
1. The Municipal Demarcation Board budget allocation has increased by 23% from R11 670 000 in the past financial year to R14 311 000 in this financial year. The MDB feels however that its budget is inadequate. The Board feels that it cannot fulfil its mandate without a larger budget as it needs to review all the ward boundaries before the 2005 local government elections. The Board also explained that there are 64 requests for re-determinations of the outer boundaries of municipalities before it at present. The Board feels that it is untenable that it has to rely on donor funding to perform certain key functions.
2. The Board’s main activities have centred around boundary determinations, advice to MEC’s for Local Government on the capacity of municipalities to perform functions, advice to departments on the alignment of functional boundaries with municipal boundaries, and the development of an integrated database.
3. The Committee acknowledged the excellent work that the Board
has done, with very limited resources and budgets. However, the study tour of municipalities revealed that there are some municipalities that are not viable as they do not have the most minimal financial, economic, revenue or other base. There is a need for drastic measures to be taken, not just by the municipalities concerned, but by provincial and national government, the private sector, communities and other stakeholders to rescue these municipalities. The Committee recognises that fundamental changes to municipal boundaries should be approached very cautiously. Boundary issues, moreover, should not be conflated with the many other issues affecting the viability of municipalities. But the Board might well have to reconsider the boundaries of these municipalities.
4. The Committee also expressed its concern that there should be
alignment between the Ministers "authorisations" of the four "national" powers and functions and the MECs "adjustments" of the remaining powers and functions, in the division between district and local municipalities. As the Board conducted the capacity assessments of municipalities on which the MECs based their decisions, the Committee feels that the Board can play a role in this regard.
K. National House of Traditional Leaders
1. The National House of Traditional Leaders reported that the past financial year has not been a fruitful one because of the lack of progress on defining the powers and functions of traditional leaders. The House also feels strongly that it should be funded to establish a permanent chamber in Cape Town to be near parliament so that it can participate effectively in legislation and policies affecting traditional leaders. It also believes that all policies and legislation affecting traditional leaders should be referred to the House, and legislative amendments should be effected to ensure this.
2. The House repeated its call for greater autonomy and to have more control over its own budget. It also reiterated that it wants to be "de-linked" from the Department and relate instead to the Presidency, since its concerns and activities cut across all departments.
3. The House stressed the need for the finalisation of the White paper
and legislation on traditional leadership and institutions as soon as possible.
4. The Committee pointed out that all the issues raised by the House
in the previous year’s budget review were taken up with the Ministry and Department. The Minister had several discussions with the Chairperson on these issues and had written to him to explain how the issues are being addressed. The Committee indicated that it cannot prescribe to the President as to which Ministry the House should fall under and suggested that the House takes this matter up with the President. It also suggested that while the House is negotiating with the Minister and Department on establishing a chamber in Cape Town, it should consider appointing a Cape Town-based parliamentary liaison officer. In respect of legislation to make it compulsory for all policies and bills affecting traditional leadership and institutions to be referred to the House, the Committee suggested that this matter should be addressed through the White Paper process and the legislation to follow.
L. Local Government, Water and Related Services Sector Training and Education Authority
R90 000 000 levy contributed by employers. This is because municipalities did not register or submit WSPs to LGWSETA or failed to implement their WSPs.
4. The Committee referred to its recent study tour of municipalities that revealed that the LGWSETA is not being effective. The Committee recognises that SETAs in general are not performing well, but stressed the vital role the LGWSETA has in the consolidation of the new system of local government. While acknowledging that the LGWSETA alone canoe be held solely responsible, the Committee expressed alarm about its failure to spend the R90 000 000 levy from employers. The Committee is also aware of the perennial crisis of leadership in the LGWSETA and hopes that the appointment of a new CEO and the election of a new leadership will mean that the LGWSETA finally begins to become effective. For the past three years, the Committee has stressed its dissatisfaction with LGWSETA’s performance. While recognising the independence of the LGWSETA, the Committee urges the Department to play a more active role in ensuring that the LGWSETA functions more effectively. The Committee will pursue its concerns about the LGWSETA at the workshop set for 14 May.
M. Conclusion