Poverty and Abuse of Children
Year |
Grant Extension Age |
Child Y age |
Receive grant: Yes |
Receive grant: No |
2003 |
9 and under |
12 |
|
X |
2004 |
11 and under |
13 |
|
X |
2005 |
14 and under |
14 |
X – until 14 then not eligible any longer |
|
Figure 1
Bureaucratic obstacles and this phasing in policy equates to a large number of families not receiving any form of assistance for the well-being of their children. And yet the state has recognised (in the White Paper for Social Welfare) that the well being of children depends on the ability of families to function effectively . South Africa’s legacy of apartheid has created a society of inequities; government’s fragmented response has exacerbated the inequalities. Inadequate implementation has prevented the realisation of the Rights enshrined in the Constitution. This has been recognised by the Taylor Committee, which acknowledges that government has well conceived plans for poverty alleviation, but argues that lack of co-ordination at the level of implementation and bureaucratic shortcomings have lead to the failure of these plans.
Conclusion