MINISTRY OF SOCIAL SERVICES AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION
Provincial Government of the Western Cape
|
|
|
|
|
1: Administration |
193,883 |
255,284 |
61,401 |
31.67 |
Total |
3,216,713 |
3,762,824 |
546,111 |
16.98 |
The economic classification of the allocation is as follows:.
|
1.2 R'000 |
% |
176,111 |
4.68 |
|
3,762,824 |
100 |
An amount of R 13 410 000 was allocated in respect of the improvement of conditions of service (ICS) carry - through costs since 1 July 2002 as well as new ICS costs from 1 July 2003.
Transfer Payments to the amount of R 3 394 531 000 makes out 90,21% of the total allocation. Only R 368 293 000 (9,79%) is available for other services rendered by the department.
Transfer Payments (R 3 394 531 000) is made up as follows:
|
1.3 R'000 |
% |
3,113,532 |
91.72 |
|
|
|
An amount of R 3 113 532 000 (82,74 %) of the total allocation was allocated to cover the expenditure in respect of social pensions and grants. This is an increase of R 459 454 000 (17,26%) on the allocation of the previous financial year.
Only an amount of R 649 292 000(17,26%) could be allocated towards other services rendered by the department.
1.3.2 EXPENDITURE PATTERNS
Expenditure |
2000/2001 Actual |
2001/2002 |
Increase/ |
% |
2002/2003 Actual |
Increase/ |
% |
2003/2004 Actual |
Increase/ |
% |
Personnel |
115,075 |
129,355 |
14,280 |
12.41 |
146,826 |
17,471 |
13.51 |
176,111 |
29,285 |
19.95 |
2,206,184 |
2,384,809 |
178,625 |
3,138,474 |
753,665 |
3,762,824 |
624,350 |
In real terms there was only significant growth in the allocation for social assistance grants.
The annual allocation in respect of other services only allows the department to sustain the existing services and make provision for inflationary increases.
No provision could be made for all new services that should be implemented or all new service providers who applied for assistance from the government.
Due to the rapid increases in the applications for social assistance grants and the fact that it is a
statutory payment most of the additional funds received for a new financial year was directed towards the service. The 80/20 principle could thus not be achieved.
Regarding the increases in personnel expenditure the department is restructuring its workforce on all levels of the establishment and is in the process of filling in vacancies.
SOCIAL SECURITY AND PUSHING BACK THE FRONTIERS OF POVERTY
PRESENTATION TO THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF PROVINCES ON
SOCIAL SECURITY IN THE WESTERN CAPE AND PUSHING
BACK THE FRONTIERS OF POVERTY.
1. INTRODUCTION
Social Security in South Africa is a very important way of lessening poverty and ensuring a redistribution of income. Pensions and social grants are the main source of income for a large proportion of the very poor and is a key cornerstone in the Government's approach to pushing back the frontiers of poverty.
2. POVERTY IN THE WESTERN CAPE
Within the context of poverty, the provision of social assistance have been identified as integral to the survival of many people living in poverty and are thus a key focus area of the Department. Approximately 85% of the Department's budget is "spent" on social assistance.
The Western Cape is considered to be a wealthy province in South Africa, yet a vast proportion of its population are living in absolute poverty, and display a level of human development more often associated with the "poor" provinces in our country. The Reconstruction and Development Program was formulated in response to poverty in our country and has been implemented in our province to reduce inequality between races and between rich and poor. The formulation of anti-poverty policies is, however, being hampered by a lack of adequate baseline in . regarding poverty. Policies cannot be formulated without a thorough knowledge of who the poor and vulnerable are, how poor they are and where they are located. The Sub-Directorate Social Research and Population Development in the Branch Social Services of the Department of Health and Social Services have attempted to address these questions. Census 96's Community Profile Database of the Western Cape has been used as the data source. (Stats SA, 1999)
Poverty is a multi-dimensional condition and an adequate definition of poverty will include as many facets of poverty as possible. There are two predominant approaches to defining poverty. A subsistence approach to defining poverty which is based on an estimate of the level of income necessary for buying food sufficient to satisfy the average nutritional needs of each adult and child within a family. The cost of this food is seen as the basic cost of subsistence, which, when added to an allowance for basic clothing, fuel and rent, produces an income figure below which families can be said to be in poverty. (Webster, 1986) The most fundamental criticism of the subsistence approach is its simplistic assumption that the basic needs of an individual or family can be determined merely through an assessment of the biological and physiological demands of the human body for food, warmth and shelter. The definition of needs can be more broadly interpreted in terms of what things are socially
expected, and thus poverty might be defined in terms of the degree to which people do not enjoy the basic standards of diet, living conditions, leisure activities and amenities, which are socially perceived as "customary". This is the second approach to defining poverty, as relative deprivation.
Individuals, families and groups in the population can be said to be in poverty when they lack the resources to obtain the types of diet, participate in the activities and have the living conditions and amenities which are customary, or at least widely encouraged or approved in their community. Their resources are so seriously below those commanded by the average individual or family that they are in effect, excluded from ordinary living patterns, customs and activities. (Townsend, 1979) The strength of this approach to poverty is that it is seen as a process of encroaching deprivation in which people gradually slip out of the mainstream of social life, almost unnoticeably, without being the stereotype paupers in rags and tatters. The most fundamental challenge to this approach is the view that one cannot construct an objective list of deprivation indicators.
The specific approach and meaning we attach to poverty usually depends upon the underlying concept of poverty we have in our minds. The two approaches discussed above are from two very different conceptions of poverty. Applied to our society, they would come up with different stories and draw different conclusions about the extent of poverty. Policy implications of how to cope with poverty would also be fundamentally different. No one set of measures will give us a complete picture of poverty, let alone give an indication of the immeasurable factors of welfare such as happiness, security, togetherness, etc..
The emerging consensus seems to characterise poverty as the inability of individuals, households, or communities, to command sufficient resources to satisfy a socially acceptable minimum standard of living. Quantifying this, however, remains difficult, and a moot point among academics and policy analysts.
In the absence of a credible and comprehensive social indicator database, and also the absence of agreed upon norms and standards for measuring poverty, Census 96 has been used to create a baseline of information relating to poverty. To be understood properly, Poverty needs to be measured at a level of well-being (subjective indicators such as happiness) as well as the easily measured objective dimensions.
The Western Cape may be a "rich" province, but it is clearly visible that the riches are skewly distributed between the population groups in the Province. Less than 50% of Black households have an annual income in excess of R1 2000, while more than 50% of White households have an annual income in excess of R54000. More than 85% of Black households earn less than the poorest 25% of White households.
Poverty in the Western Cape also shows a very strong rural I urban bias. Close to 50% of rural households earn less than R12000 per annum. In the urban areas, almost 50% of households earn more than R30000 per annum.
According to the income line of R1 8000 per annum 41,5% of the households in the Western Cape live in poverty. The National average is 64,7%. Seven Magisterial Districts are worse off than the national average. They are Murraysburg (81,5%), Uniondale (74,3%), Prince Albert (72,4%), Laingsburg (71,7%), Calitzdorp (70,5%), Ladismith (68,5%), and Robertson (64,8%). With the exception of Robertson, these magisterial districts are clustered together in the Little and Great Karoo. Robertson, however, lies adjacent to this area. Bellville, Cape, Simons' Town and Somerset West are the magisterial districts with the fewest households living in poverty. It is of significance, however, that not one single magisterial district has less than 20% of its households living in poverty.
In real numbers, approximately 357 480 households in the Western Cape, are living in poverty. The greatest majority of them, 83 400, live in the Mitchell's Plain magisterial district. Wynberg magisterial district with 34 511 households, has the second most households living in poverty. In Murraysburg, 1060 out of a total of 1301 households, live in poverty.
The north west of the province along with the Karoo and Little Karoo stand out as the most vulnerable areas, with more than 60% of all households in those magisterial districts recording an annual income of less than Ri 8,000.
3. THE CONSTITUTION
Section 27(1) of the Constitution on health care, food, water and social security determines that:
(1) Everyone has the right to have access to:
(a) Health care services, including reproductive health care;
(b) Sufficient food and water; and
(c) Social security, including, if they are unable to support themselves and their dependants, appropriate social assistance.
(2) The State must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within it's available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of each of these rights.
4. SOCIAL ASSISTANCE ACT, 1992
The Department of Social Services and Poverty Alleviation is responsible for the administration of the Social Assistance Act, 1992 (Act 59 of 1992) as amended by the Welfare Laws Amendment Act, 1997 (Act 106 of 1997). The Social Assistance Act makes provision for the following grant types:
·
Grants for the Aged
Payable to older persons in terms of the legislation and is payable to women of 60 years and older and men of 65 years and older.
. War Veteran grants
Payment of grants to disabled or older persons who are 60 years and older and who fought in the First or Second World War or the Korean War.
·
Grant for the disabled
Payment of grants to disabled persons who are older than 18 years and who are, owing to their physical or mental disability, unfit to obtain by virtue of any service, employment or profession, the means needed to enable them to provide for their maintenance.
. Grants-in-aid
Paid to persons, who are in receipt of old age, war veteran or disability grants who are unable to care for themselves in terms of the legislation.
Foster child grants
Payable in terms of legislation to legal foster parents for children under the age of 18 years.
·
Care Dependency grants
Payable in terms of legislation to biological or foster parents in respect of children between the ages of 1 and 18 years who require and receive permanent home care due to their severe mental or physical disability.
. Child support grant
Payable to a primary caregiver of children under the age of 9 years. As from 1 April 2004 the age was increased to include children under the age of 11 years. From 1 April 2005 the age will be increased to include children under the age of 14 years.
5. SOCIAL SECURITY BUDGET
5.1 Budget for 2002/03 amounts to R2 459 147 000.
5.2 Budget for 2003/04 amounts to R3 210 120 000.
5.3 Monthly amount of i R280 m is paid to beneficiaries in the Western Cape.
5.4 473 599 beneficiaries received their monthly payments for May 2003 through the following pay methods:
·
Banks (58 733)
·
Post Office (Walvis Bay) (203)
·
Institutions (CPOA) (574)
·
ALLPAY (414089)
5.5 Budget for Social Security makes up 85.3% of the Provincial Welfare Budget. With the increases in Social Security expenditure, less funds are available for other welfare services.
6. TRANSFER PAYMENTS FOR MAY2003
Diagram not included
GROWTH IN BENEFICIARY NUMBERS
Diagram not included
F
7
Grants
Co
March 2002 |
May 2003 |
|
Old Age Grants |
150508 |
156116 |
War Veteran Grants |
1368 |
1159 |
Disability Grants |
103 589 |
126425 |
Foster Care Grants |
13499 |
14 430 |
Care Dependency |
4 381 |
5 525 |
Combinations |
402 |
337 |
Child Support Grants |
104519 |
169 573 |
Institutional Grants |
41 |
34 |
TOTAL |
378 266 |
473 599 |
U 2- ~HER&NT G?ANT _P[S AND BENFFICIARY r\UMBE~S
We presently have 473 599 beneficiaries In the Western Cape receiving various grants For May 2003 the information on the beneficiary numbers -was as follows
Diagram not included
9. DIFFERENT GRANT TYPES AND AMOUNTS
For May 2003 the information was as follows
Diagram not included
10. GRANT TYPES AMOUNTS, % GROWTH AND BUDGET
2.1.1~1.1.1.1 Grants for the aged
Financial Year |
Ben. Number As of on 31 March |
Grant amounts |
% Growth ave. ben . no's from previous fin year |
Budget |
2001/02 |
150 508 |
R 570 |
0.96 |
R 993 027 000 |
2002/03 |
155 168 |
R 620/640 |
3.8 |
R 1 146 253 000 |
2003/04 |
R 700 |
R 1 303 658 000 |
||
Financial Year |
Ben. Number As of on 31 March |
Grant amounts |
% Growth ave. ben . no's from previous fin year |
Budget |
2001/02 |
1368 |
R 588 |
-19.97 |
R 9 798 00 |
2002/03 |
1 179 |
R638/ R658 |
-16.03 |
R 6 166 000 |
2003/04 |
R 718 |
R 8 532 000 |
||
2.1.1.1.1 1.3 Grants for the disabled
Financial Year |
Ben. Number As of on 31 March |
Grant amounts |
% Growth ave. ben . no's from previous fin year |
Budget |
2001/02 |
103 589 |
R 570 |
3.61% |
R 635 867 00 |
2002/03 |
112 702 |
R 620/R 640 |
23.24% |
R 845 607 000 |
2003/04 |
R700 |
R 1 047 575 000 |
||
Financial Year |
Ben. Number As of on 31 March |
Grant amounts |
% Growth ave. ben . no's from previous fin year |
Budget |
2001/02 |
13 499 |
R 410 |
1.14 |
R 96 700 000 |
2002/03 |
14 160 |
R450/640 |
9.8 |
123 299 000 |
2003/04 |
R500 |
R |
||
2.1.1.1.1.1.6 Care Dependency grant
Financial Year |
Ben. Number As of on 31 March |
Grant amounts |
% Growth ave. ben . no's from previous fin year |
Budget |
2001/02 |
4 3981 |
R 570 |
31.66 |
R 28 274 000 |
2002/03 |
5 460 |
R 620/R640 |
38.16% |
R 37 294 000 |
2003/04 |
R 700 |
R56 627 000 |
||
2.1.1.1.1.1.7 Child support grant
Financial Year |
Ben. Number As of on 31 March |
Grant amounts |
% Growth ave. ben . no's from previous fin year |
Budget |
2001/02 |
104 519 |
R 110 |
264 |
R127 325 000 |
2002/03 |
165 450 |
R 130/140 |
92.7 |
R313 106 000 |
2003/04 |
R160 |
139 170 00 |
||
11. SOCIAL SECURITY BUDGET PRESSURES
Financial Year |
Target |
Number of CSG |
% Achieved against the grant |
1999/00 |
27 900 |
35 on 31103/2000 |
38.83 |
2000/01 |
51 750 |
93 on 31103/2001 |
97.95 |
2001/02 |
74970 |
150 on 31103/2002 |
183.20 |
002/03 |
90 000 |
554 on 31103/2003 |
227.28 |
12.SOCIAL RELIEF OF DISTRESS