OUTLINING THE NDA DISBURSEMENT AND PERFORMANCE SINCE INCEPTION

Presentation to Portfolio Committee

Department of Social Development

Presented by CEO – National Developent Agency

Delani Mthembu

 

TABLE OF CONTECTS

 

1. PREAMBLE

2. BACKGROUND

4. MANDATE

3. APPROACH & PHILOSOPHY

5. STRATEGY

6. MTEF SINCE 2000

7. RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS AND ANALYSIS

8. PARTNERSHIPS

9. NDA COMPETENCY

10. CHALLENGES

 

11. 2003/4 PRIORITIES

12. WAY-FORWARD

 

1. PREAMBLE

A challenge the NDA is exploring was highlighted by the 10-point plan in the President’s State of The Nation Address 2002. The President highlighted the following ten points:

 

 

2. BACKGROUND

The establishment of the NDA was an out come of social dialogue between the Government, Civil Society, Business and Funding Agencies to ensure that a formal facilitative platform is created to support a development paradigm whose centerpiece is people driven in partnership with government.

In the context of this framework, Parliament passed the NDA Act no. 108 of 1998, taking into account the work that was already done by the RDP Office. The emphasis arising from the conception and evolution of the NDA as an institution is based on:

Commitment to the social and political mandate as envisioned by the NDA Act No 108 of 1998

 

Dialogue with beneficiaries and strategic partners;

An evolving, innovative and dynamic poverty eradication strategy and process;

A growing and learning organizational development context;

An effective and efficient delivery plan.

3. THE MANDATE

The NDA is constituted through an Act of Parliament – Act 108 of 1998 as promulgated in April 2000 and therefore has the mandate to ensure that it fulfills its role as defined by the NDA Act.

The NDA aims are:

To provide financial support to programmes and projects that will contribute directly to the enhancement of the asset-base of the poor.

To build the leadership, technical expertise and management capabilities of civil society organisations that help to eradicate poverty.

To build relationships and income streams with significant donors that work to eradicate poverty and its causes.

Establish a broad and reliable database of civil society organisations and poverty eradication institutions and organisations for the purpose of developing partnerships and sharing them with the state and other stakeholders.

To promote dialogue between government, intergovernmental organisations and government departments at all levels to influence policy change and development action. Document and conduct regular seminars, conferences and policy forums on poverty eradication to guide policy discussions and policy formulation in government and civil society partnerships.

Vigorously conduct impact assessments on program activities of the NDA.

4. APPROACH AND PHILOSOPHY

The new approach is to move away from direct financial involvement in small stand-alone projects to bigger projects or programmes that will be viable and suitable with better economies of scales and for more value for money. These bigger programmes could be a cluster of homogenous smaller projects consolidated into a single programme to optimize the economies of scale or a project could be a cluster of heterogeneous projects that support each other to optimize synergy. The second type of clustered programmes could form an integrated supply chain to the benefit of all participants.

The benefit of these macro and special programmes is that they will be sustainable and will include a substantial number of individual projects that will be linked to such programmes. Small projects will not operate in isolation but will be linked to secure outlets for their contribution. The scale of these special programmes will also ensure that market impact will be substantial and it would be possible to link such programmes to existing commercial initiatives that will enhance the overall.

5. STRATEGY

The successful implementation of the new strategic direction in terms of project funding will require the following implementation steps:

­ Ensure that the identified macro projects are aligned with Urban Renewal Strategy, Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Plan and IDP’s.

® Develop a detailed business plan for each macro project, identify potential participants and determine to what extend existing projects and programmes as well as new applications can be absorbed by these macro programmes.

¯ Identify the projects and applications that are not absorbed by macro programmes and cluster them into smaller programmes.

° Determine the impact of the new direction on the structure and service delivery of the NDA as an organisation and quantify the impact in terms of a business plan.

5.1 Figure 1: Integrated Project Approach

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.2 NDA Risk Management Process

Grant funding is an inherently high-risk method of funding susceptible to fraud and mismanagement. The NDA strives to ensure that the funding it makes available reaches the intended beneficiaries. To achieve this objective Risk Management is a key activity in the grant funding process and the monitoring tool used by the NDA.

The risk process of the NDA involves: -

  1. Performing due diligence reviews prior to the funding being made available.
  2. Performing independent audit reviews before the release of further tranches once the first tranche is released.
  3. Performing final audit reviews before the closure of the projects.

The above processes are included in the project audit cycle for each project funded by the NDA.

In addition to the above process the NDA is due to launch an Ethics Hotline. The Hotline will be aimed at enabling the public to report suspicious activity relating to donor and grant funding. One number will be available and it will cover the entire development sector, that number is 0800 100 100.

Ethics Hotline

The Ethics Hotline (outsourced to Tip-Offs Anonymous) is currently in progress and the NDA will manage the Hotline. Information that becomes available that affects other funding agencies will be communicated to them. The Department of Social Development, IDT and other partners are being identified and approached with the concept. The NDA is currently preparing a proposal to the European Union to partner in this important venture. The launch date for Tip-Off Anonymous will be before the end of March 2003.

 

6. M T E F (Medium Term Expenditure Framework) since 2000

Grant Allocation in Terms of Medium Term Expenditure Framework

Grant Allocation from National Government of the Republic of South Africa to the NDA since inception.

Table 1

 

Percentage

Year

Grant

Increase/(decrease)

Grants Received

1999/00

100,000,000

0.00%

2000/01

90,000,000

(10.00%)

2001/02

92,690,000

2.99%

2002/03

96,745,000

4.37%

2003/04

103,283,000

6.76%

2004/05

109,481,000

6.00%

2005/06

116,049,000

6.00%

Projected annual increase year on year for the next 4 years average about 6%.

7. RESOURCE ALLOCATION AND ANALYSIS

7.1 Grant Disbursement History

Total funds under management of the Agency since inception, to 25 March 2003, amounts to R742, 823, 519. Of this amount 92% have been allocated and committed to projects and support activities. The period under review also shows an improvement in the disbursement of the various grants. Delays in concluding contracts and finalizing monitoring reports have been some of the factors that lead to slow disbursement of funds. A more comprehensive picture of the various grants is presented below.

Table 2:

SUMMARY OF GRANT FUNDS UNDER MANAGEMENT AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 2003

Grants

Grant Received

 

Commitment

Unallocated Grants

Government Grant: 1996/1998 (TNDT)

100,000,000

100,025,528

(25,528)

GOVT 1996 - 1st Tranche (1996)

50,000,000

50,211,627

(211,627)

GOVT 1999 - 2nd Tranche (1996)

50,000,000

49,813,901

186,099

Government Grant: 1999/00 and 2000/1

190,000,000

190,000,000

-

Direct funding to project *

171,000,000

171,000,000

-

Programme Support Costs

5,000,000

5,000,000

-

Administration

11,000,000

11,000,000

-

NDA Implementation and Repositioning Costs

3,000,000

3,000,000

-

Government Grant: 2001/2

92,690,000

92,690,000

-

Direct funding to project *

60,248,500

60,248,500

-

Programme Support Costs

18,538,000

18,538,000

-

Administration

13,903,500

13,903,500

-

Government Grant: 2002/3

96,745,000

96,745,000

-

Direct funding to project *

62,884,250

62,884,250

-

Programme Support Costs

19,349,000

19,349,000

-

Administration

14,511,750

14,511,750

-

Gauteng Department of Social Development

19,000,000

19,000,000

-

Direct funding to project *

19,000,000

19,000,000

-

Poverty Relief Program (Dept. Social Development)

5,500,000

5,100,000

400,000

Direct funding to project *

5,500,000

5,100,000

400,000

Total Grants from Government including 2002/3

503,935,000

 

503,560,528

374,472

Independent Development Trust

100,000,000

86,785,762

13,214,238

Sustainability Funds

15,500,000

10,297,092

5,202,908

Special Projects

4,500,000

4,500,000

-

IT Infrastructure Development

1,500,000

1,500,000

-

Direct Project Funding

14,000,000

13,988,670

11,330

Direct Project Funding: Faith Based Organization

8,000,000

-

8,000,000

NDA Infrastructure - Capital Expenditure

6,000,000

6,000,000

-

Development Fund (Investment)

50,500,000

50,500,000

-

Funds from European Union

138,888,519

108,310,072

30,578,447

EU 1996

79,404,246

79,404,246

-

EU 2000

13,459,704

13,459,704

-

EU 2001

46,024,569

15,446,122

30,578,447

Grand Total

742,823,519

 

698,656,362

44,167,157

Note: Definitions and Notes

1. Commitment – Projects approved by Board for Funding

2. Disbursements - Actual amounts transferred to projects/recipients

3. Grants received late cause a major delay in disbursements

4. Funds are disbursed in tranches based on requirements and needs (60/40 or 40/30/30)

5. Part of NDA funds goes to dialogue, policy development, research, capacity building, operational costs, impact assessment, and Capital items.

6. Some project commitments are over a period of three years in order to address sustainability

 

7.2 Grant Commitment (2002/3)

As at 12th December 2002 the total commitments on the Government 2003 grant shows that the grant is now overdrawn. The sentiment expressed in numerous PPS meetings was that commitments should continue and funding would be sought from other NDA investments.

A revised analysis of the grant budget is as follows:

Table 3: BUDGET ANALYSIS PER PROVINCE (As at 25 March 2003)

PROVINCE

COMMITTED FUNDS

DISBURSED FUNDS

KZN

R 77,443,469

R 51,111,458

LP

R 81,003,966

R 51,736,297

MP

R 32,282,086

R 19,190,332

EC

R 90,168,629

R 56,213,370

NC

R 20,944,843

R 8,741,606

WC

R 64,597,538

R 51,867,406

GTG

R 121,150,033

R 99,436,155

FS

R 29,340,597

R 22,230,192

NW

R 27,565,876

R 20,002,344

Total

R 544,497,037

R 380,529,161

NB: 1. Projects in the Gauteng Province include national activities such as WCAR, WSSD.

2. Funds are available from the NDA investments to cover over commitment.

3.Planned budgets per province are determined by a formula that considers, among others, national provincial prioritization by the government.

Notes: - Project applications received amount to in excess of R8 billion

7.3 Funded Projects Portfolio

There are currently 2 186 funded projects and these are spread across all the nine provinces. These projects are divided into different stages as follows:

Projects at the contracting stage

329

Projects at the first tranche stage

703

Projects awaiting closure

753

Complete Projects

401

Total

2186

The NDA’s primary focus has been the acceleration of outstanding disbursement, especially for project in the first tranche stage. The NDA worked tirelessly in the last quarter of the year to ensure the funded portfolio is brought up to speed in terms of disbursement, overdue report and finalized contract. This aspect of the work still remains a challenge and the NDA has put together a plan to sort out all outstanding issues on the funded projects by 31st March 2003.

 

8. PARTNERSHIPS

As a premier partner to civil society and government, the NDA has forged partnerships with a whole range of important role players and stakeholders in the development sector. These partnerships are entered into with the NDA being clearly informed by its mandate and objectives as contained in the Act.

The basis for partnership is undoubtedly a necessary step for the NDA to achieve its objectives especially given the limited resources at its disposal; limited as opposed to the high demand placed on its door step by the society need – the need to provide a sustainable response to poverty eradication in South Africa.

The NDA’s strategic intent seeks to support government and civil society’s development action in a holistic way. This will be achieved through efforts that will put civil society at the centre of development and service delivery. The NDA policy framework ensures that the NDA resource base and influence pulls other partners in development to a set of common principles, agendas and objectives around poverty eradication.

To drive programme delivery and capacity leverage, partnerships are formed at three levels:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partnerships Portfolio

NO

Partnership

Sector

Purpose

1.

ABSA

Economic Development

Joint Funding

Fundraising

ABSA Services

Technical Support

2.

Sinqobile (SABS)

SMME Development

TQM & Standards

3.

Ethekwini Metro (GDDF)

Training & Development

Project Funding

4.

Land Commission/ Land Bank

Land Restitution

Capacity Building

Structuring

Mobilisation

5.

Mandela Children’s Fund

Youth Development

Joint Funding

6.

Ciskei Community Trust on Fisheries

Economic Development

Joint Funding

Capacity Building

7.

USAID

Education, health and Economic Development

Project Funding, Capacity Building for NGO’s and Policy Research

8.

Minerals and Energy

Economic Development

Joint Project Funding and capacity Building

9.

Department of Labour

Training and Development

Capacity Building

10.

Social Services (Gauteng and Western Cape)

Economic Development and Poverty Alleviation

Policy and Research, Joint funding and project management

11.

Centre for Civil Society - University of Natal

Policy and Research

Joint Activities on Research and Policy Reviews.

Concluded Partnerships

Partnerships under discussion

NO

Partnership

Sector

Purpose

1.

ABSA Foundation

Training and Development

Capacity Building

2.

Vodacom Foundation

Marketing

Sponsorship

Publication Production

3.

CSIR

Policy Research

Joint Research

4.

Interfund

Training and Development

Capacity Building

5.

Land Affairs & Agriculture

Agriculture

Capacity Building

Joint Funding

6.

Independent Development Trust

Sustainable Development

Joint Project Funding and Management

7.

Kellogg Foundation

Training & Development

Joint Funding

Capacity Building

8.

DPLG

ISRDP, Urban Renewal, IDP

Joint activities and capacity building

9.

Compaq HP

Technology, SMME Development

Joint funding

11.

Standard Bank

Financial Skills Training, HIV/AIDS, Literacy, SMME Development

Joint funding

12.

Umsobomvu

Youth Development

Joint activities

13.

Ntsika

Economic Development

SMME, Capacity Building

14.

UNDP

Policy and research

Development lessons

15.

Peoples Bank

Financial Skills

Joint funding and leadership development

16.

SASOL

Economic Development

Joint Funding and Project Management

 

9. NDA COMPETENCY

9.1 Information Technology and Communication Services

The IT Service contributes directly to the NDA's strategic objective to provide quality services in the provision of information, particularly in the key priority area of capacity building.

The IT Service contributes indirectly by providing modern, reliable computer systems for all Directorates of the NDA. This in turn assists these Directorates in their aim to contribute to the mission of the NDA. In making services available to communities, the NDA has extended its technological infrastructure to all provinces. This process has necessitated the capacity building of NDA staff to equip them to make use of this technology. New accounting software "Great Plains Dynamics" has been implemented to allow for integrated services and eliminate duplication of work. The new accounting software provides Financial Management solutions amongst the key ones being; cost centre reporting, budgeting and production of monthly and annual reports.

9.2 The Call Centre

As a link between the NDA, projects and other stakeholders, a call centre is fully operational and resident within the NDA to attend to queries and enquiries as well as status levels of projects. The number for the call centre is 0860 122 133.

9.3 Business process Improvement Unit

The NDA has established a Business Process Improvement Unit to facilitate continuous improvement, integration, management of information and to supply chain management process.

9.4 Sector Specialist Unit

A sector specialist unit has also been established to ensure that NDA enhances its intellectual capacity around Economic Development, Agriculture and Food Security, Health, Education and Entrepreneurship.

9.5 Project Management and Disbursement Systems

In the area of Project Management, the NDA competency is on Project Assessment and regular project visits as well as reports on project performances. Through monitoring & evaluation of projects, the element of risk is detected quite early. While through Impact Assesment the NDA is able ascertain the ramification of projects.

9.6 Human Resources and Decentralization

The decentralisation of the NDA to provinces makes accessibity to projects and beneficiaries convenient and without bureaucracy. All provinces have been demarcated into 5 regions to ensure accessibility and regular contact with projects on the ground.

9.7 Chain Supply Management

The NDA has included in its Project Cycle, an element of Supply Chain Management with a view to ensure appropriate use of funds by Grantees thus ensuring their sustainability. Projects will be guaranteed quality products and Services through a Supplier database constituting credible Suppliers to source products and services from.

The process is two pronged in that, while it addresses the project needs, it also adresses BEE candidates that need to be developed in order to move to the accreditation level.

9.8 Risk Managemet and the Ethics Hotline.

The NDA has embarked on a vigorous risk management programme to ensure that the NDA’s resources are spent expeditiously. In line with this, the Watchdog for Development ethics hotline has been established. It is envisaged that this line will be used by a number of entities in the development sector.

10. CHALLENGES

The NDA is faced with the following challenges as it endeavors to deliver on its mandate: -

11 . PRIORITIES FOR 2003/4

v Grant disbursement through

v Funding

v Research and Development Programme

v Dialogue and Partnerships through

. MINMEC

. Provincial MEC’s for agriculture, Economic Affairs and Social Welfare.

. Portfolio Committees – DSD , DTI, Agriculture, DME, DOL, DPLG, Treasury and Land Affairs.

. NEPAD Core Group.

. UNDP, USAID and other multinationals.

. Private sector.

v Business Process Improvement Programmes

v Risk Management Programme

12. CONCLUSION

In conclusion; it is important to note that the NDA does not exist for its own sake, but to facilitate interactions among civil society, government and the private sector in a bid to eradicate poverty. The levels at which these interactions occur is informed by the kind of outcome we seek to achieve. This in turn informs the nature of the partnership, i.e. long term or medium term.

The partnerships that we seek to build between governent and civil society, private sector included should be able to assist in mobilizing social capital in South Africa and meet the development needs of the our society, redefine social relations and facilitate a broad social transformation agenda.

Partnerships work on the basis of respect, trust and equality. Partners share a common vision and purpose, and thus are prepared to explore:

. joint project funding and allocation of resources to the most needy and deserving cases.

. sharing learning experiences, technology and tools,

. development of successful models of co-operation.

. the opportunity to broaden the participation by other donors, private sector and other stakeholders.

. establishment of joint vehicles to address gaps in the sector, i.e. micro-credit schemes, capacity building, mentoring and coaching.

. give basis for claim on the contribution and role in addressing the plight of the poor.

. determining of common priorities, research agendas and impact assessment studies.