Report on the Utilisation and Impact of Conditional Grants in the Department of Education: 2001/2002
Conditional Grants for Financial Management and Quality Enhancement in Education
Table of Contents
Section 1: Consolidated report
Programme |
Mandatory |
Non-mandatory |
1. HIV/Aids (separate grant) |
|
|
2. School effectiveness |
|
Longitudinal studies targeting identified nodal areas. |
3. Literacy (separate grant) |
|
|
4. Further Education and Training |
|
|
5. Organisational effectiveness of the national and provincial education departments |
|
|
6. Values in education |
|
|
Identification of provincial projects
The principle underlying the mandatory and non-mandatory framework is that these initiatives should be addressed in general, with a particular emphasis on implementation in nodal areas as a priority.
It is the responsibility of the provincial education departments to identify specific projects that give effect to this. As stated previously, these projects have to be set out in business plans.
The allocation of conditional grant funds
At its inception, the programme had a total budget of R200 million for 1998/1999 projects. The programme was planned to run for an initial three-year period. In the 1999/2000 financial year, the total allocation for projects under this programme was R261 million, while in 2000/2001 the allocation stood at R272 million. The total allocation for the 2001/2002 financial year was R282 million.
The allocation of the overall conditional grant budget to the provinces in 2001/2002, as determined in the education component of the Equitable Share formula used in the line budget allocation, is reflected in Table 1.2 below and graphically in Figure 1.1.
Table 1.2: The conditional grant budget allocations for the provinces in 2001/2002
Province |
Approved roll-over 2000/2001 |
2001/2002 Allocation |
Total funds available (2001/2002) |
|
R’000 |
R’000 |
R’000 |
EASTERN CAPE |
- |
39,405 |
39,405 |
FREE STATE |
9,315 |
13,419 |
22,734 |
GAUTENG |
- |
26,199 |
26,199 |
KWAZULU-NATAL |
6,531 |
47,073 |
53,604 |
LIMPOPO |
- |
33,441 |
33,441 |
MPUMALANGA |
5,204 |
15,549 |
20,753 |
NORTH WEST |
- |
17,040 |
17,040 |
NORTHERN CAPE |
- |
4,407 |
4,407 |
WESTERN CAPE |
3,897 |
16,827 |
20,724 |
TOTAL |
24,947 |
213,000 |
237,947 |
Purpose, generation and structure of this report
Purpose
The main purpose of this report is to give an account of the achievements and impact of the conditional grant projects dealing with Financial Management and Quality Enhancement in Education in the nine provinces during the 2001/2002 financial year.
Problems hindering the implementation of conditional grants in the provinces are identified.
Recommendations for overcoming these challenges and for the further use of conditional grants are included.
Report generation
In support of the responsibility of the Director-General of Education, in his capacity as a transferring national officer, the Directorate: Development Support manages the processes of business plan approval, monitoring of the utilisation of the funds and reporting on the implementation of conditional grant projects. The Directorate also provides support to the provinces during the development of business and implementation plans through training workshops and, where necessary, through direct assistance to individual provinces on request.
As is the practice in the DoE, inter provincial meetings were used as a monitoring mechanism. Monitoring teams from the DoE also visited all nine provinces.
The following paragraphs set out the meetings and visits that were used to obtain comprehensive feedback on the conditional grant projects. The focus was on monitoring progress, the utilisation of conditional grants and the sharing of experiences and best practices. This is the first time such an approach was used for these projects.
Inter provincial meetings took place quarterly.
Monitoring visits took place over the period May to September 2002. The visits took the form of meetings with project managers (actual implementers) at provincial, regional and district level. Each project manager made a presentation focusing on achievements, obstacles, and expenditure levels by the end of March 2002. Also, provincial project managers were required to submit progress and annual reports on the 2001/2002 period.
These were conducted in all the provinces in accordance with section 57 of the PFMA, which provides for regular monitoring of public funds, including, conditional grant funded projects to prevent any irregular and fruitless expenditure. Section 2(f) and (g) of the DORA also provide for proper financial management and accountability for the use of public resources.
This consolidated report is based on the information gathered through the business plan evaluations, training workshops, progress and annual reports and the monitoring visits and meetings.
Structure
The report is divided into three sections.
Section 1 of the report, this section, provides a summary of the findings and recommendations on actions to improve the effectiveness of conditional grant implementation and the future use of conditional grants.
Section 2 contains a consolidation of the monitoring information gathered through the various monitoring mechanisms. Information is given for each project in each province, under the following headings: Name of Project, Achievements, Challenges, Concerns and Deviations. Recommendations stemming from the observations in the province are also given.
Section 3 contains a consolidated assessment of the impact of each of the conditional grant projects in the provinces. It was compiled as a requirement of the National Education Policy Act (NEPA), 1996 (Act No. 27 of 1996). The NEPA requires that the standard of Education provision, delivery and performance should be monitored and evaluated by the DoE annually or at other specific intervals, with the object of assessing progress in service delivery and compliance with the provisions governing utilisation of financial resources.
Issues gleaned from monitoring the utilisation of conditional grants
Budgets and expenditure
Financial allocations and expenditure as at March 2002, per province
The financial situation in each province as at the end of the 2001/2002 financial year is set out in Table 1.3.
Table 1.3: Financial allocations and expenditure as at March 2002, per province
Province |
Approved roll-over 2000/2001 |
2001/2002 Allocation |
Total funds available |
Expenditure as at March 2002 |
Balance |
|
R’000 |
R’000 |
R’000 |
R’000 |
R’000 |
EASTERN CAPE |
- |
39,405 |
39,405 |
14,908 |
24,497 |
FREE STATE |
9,315 |
13,419 |
22,734 |
12,457 |
10,277 |
GAUTENG |
- |
26,199 |
26,199 |
23,242 |
2,957 |
KWAZULU-NATAL |
6,531 |
47,073 |
53,604 |
46,968 |
6,636 |
LIMPOPO |
- |
33,441 |
33,441 |
26,754 |
6,687 |
MPUMALANGA |
5,204 |
15,549 |
20,753 |
13,752 |
7,001 |
NORTH WEST |
- |
17,040 |
17,040 |
14,419 |
2,621 |
NORTHERN CAPE |
- |
4,407 |
4,407 |
3,905 |
142 |
WESTERN CAPE |
3,897 |
16,827 |
20,724 |
18,242 |
2,482 |
TOTAL |
24,947 |
213,000 |
237,947 |
174,647 |
63,300 |
Despite the under-expenditure, the overall level of expenditure shows an improvement on the figures for the previous years. This is reflected in Tables 1.4 and 1.5 and Figures 1.2 and 1.3.
Table 1.4: Comparison of expenditure against allocations during the past years
Conditional grant cycle |
Total Allocation |
Expenditure |
Amount unspent |
Percentage unspent |
1998/1999 |
149,541 |
26,029 |
123,512 |
82,6% |
1999/2000 |
192,000 |
96,790 |
95,210 |
49,6% |
2000/2001 |
253,987 |
133,042 |
120,945 |
47,6% |
2001/2002 |
237,947 |
174,647 |
63,300 |
26,6% |
Table 1.5: Comparison of under expenditure per province per year
Province |
% Unspent |
|||
1998/99 |
1999/00 |
2000/01 |
2001/02 |
|
Eastern Cape |
98.3% |
76.3% |
85.0% |
62.2% |
Free State |
87.3% |
61.2% |
48.8% |
45.2% |
Gauteng |
54.4% |
52.9% |
40.3% |
11.3% |
KwaZulu Natal |
77.5% |
28.0% |
15.7% |
12.4% |
Limpopo |
69.8% |
49.5% |
56.7% |
3.2% |
Mpumalanga |
100.0% |
40.4% |
52.8% |
20.0% |
North West |
100.0% |
79.9% |
62.3% |
33.7% |
Northern Cape |
100.0% |
4.8% |
33.8% |
15.4% |
Western Cape |
86.3% |
19.4% |
26.8% |
12.0% |
Provincial allocations of conditional grants, per programme
Although the Tirisano Implementation Plan has six programmes, the provincial allocations to different programmes show that by and large four programmes benefit from the grant. It has to be noted, however, that for Programme 4: Further Education and Higher Education the allocation is spent more on Further Education, which is a concurrent competency. The provincial allocations are shown in Figure 1.4.
Global allocation per programme (percent)
Planning processes
In order to improve on the planning and coordination processes, the DoE has introduced improved mechanisms. These were informed by numerous observations that, since their inception, conditional grant projects have been dogged by numerous problems, such as a lack of proper planning which had resulted in management problems and under-expenditure. These problems were exacerbated by tendering problems, which undermined the timely procurement of goods and services.
The improved levels of expenditure, as reflected in the previous table, and feedback from the provinces indicate an improved efficiency of conditional grant planning and implementation.
The planning and approval process is outlined as follows:
Conducting capacity building workshops on the Business Plan Development and Implementation process for newly appointed provincial coordinators and project managers;
Development of business plans;
Evaluation of business plans in the provinces by provincial appraisal teams;
Approval of business plans in the provinces by the Head of the Department;
Submission of business plans to the DoE by provinces;
Appraisal and approval of provincial business plans by the DoE;
The coordination process is outlined as follows:
Quarterly forum meetings on conditional grants (national project managers);
Quarterly inter-provincial meetings (HEDCOM Sub-Committee on Conditional Grants);
Workshops on technical implementation and reporting;
Quarterly submission of progress reports by the provinces;
Analysis of progress reports and presentation of critical issues gleaned from the reports at the inter-provincial meetings;
Monthly submission of financial and narrative reports by provinces;
Provincial on-site monitoring visits by the DoE.
Observations and recommendations from the monitoring process
Section 2 of this report contains detailed observations and recommendations.
Critical observations and recommendations, drawn from Section 2, are summarised below.
Deviations
Observations
A number of provinces deviated from the approved business plans and the conditions of the conditional grants. Further, the required procedure for the approval of deviations was not followed.
In one province, school safety activities were extended outside of the nodal areas as identified in the approved business plans. In another, printing services for examination papers were out sourced without this being in the approved business plan. These were done without seeking approval of the deviations from the Director-General.
Recommendation
Provincial departments should recognise that the approved business plans are legal documents and any deviation should be referred, through the Head of Department, to the Director-General for approval. To ensure appropriate coordination, such amendments must be contained in amended business plans.
Provinces should also take cognisance of the three Declaration Clauses at the end of each approved business plan, to which Heads of Department appended their signatures. One of the clauses reads as follows:
"The business plan represents a true and fair view of the intentions of the plan of the Provincial Education Department under the Conditional Grants. I understand that there can be no movement between agreed budget lines if the National Department of Education has not been informed beforehand and the movement been agreed to in writing by the Director-General. I further understand that if we do not meet the requirements as set out in the Division of Revenue Bill, that the Department has the right to suspend further payments."
Procurement of equipment and other recurrent expenditure
Observation
Provincial departments should take note that staff salaries, capital expenditure or anything else that would incur recurrent costs is not allowed under conditional grant rules.
However, according to the reports, seven of the provinces procured equipment such as laptops, computers, PA Systems, cameras, fax and photocopy machines and printers, office furniture (including, desks, carpets), and cabling for networks with offices and schools with conditional grant funds in the 2001/2002 financial year.
Recommendation
Provinces should take cognisance of the second of the three Declaration Clauses found at the end of each approved business plan, to which Heads of Department appended their signatures. The second of the clauses reads as follows:
"I hereby confirm that I am in receipt of the enclosed document and that I have set up a separate suspense account for the Conditional Grants funds and will manage it on a monthly basis and will supply the financial information to the Project Manager and the Department as requested and prescribed in the Division of Revenue Bill. I understand that the Conditional Grants allocation may not be spent on capital expenditure or payment of salaries on a recurrent basis."
Insufficient capacity to manage projects
Observation
A lack of capacity to manage projects at provincial and district level was found across provinces. The provincial coordinators complained that most project managers saw conditional grant projects as non-core business and this affected implementation. The DoE also observed that a lack of capacity to implement the conditional grants as planned seems to lead to the temptation to spend a portion of these funds on capital equipment because such purchases are relatively easy to administer.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends to provincial education departments that conditional grant projects should be integrated with the core business of the departments, so that they are managed in the line function.
Intervention overload at the nodal areas
Observation
Almost all provinces complained that the stakeholders in the nodal areas were experiencing intervention overload, as most projects were targeting the same constituencies.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that provinces should pay attention to coordinating projects in the nodal areas to avoid targeting the same people, and that the districts need to coordinate activities of NGOs and other Departments operating in the schools to avoid intervention overload.
Insufficient information on conditional grants
Observation
Almost all project managers expressed the sentiment that the use of conditional grants was not completely understood by Senior Managers at provincial and district level. In most cases, this fact accounted for the deviations in expenditure or activities. Project managers also raised the issue of lack of support from senior management for conditional grant projects.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that the inter-provincial meetings and workshops, including monitoring visits, should also involve senior officials at provincial and district level, so as to build a common understanding on the use of conditional grants.
Delays in implementation
Observation
The project management across provinces indicated that the following issues delayed implementation:
Protracted and cumbersome procurement procedures in provinces and lack of capacity on the part of the procurement sections in the departments; these factors invariably account for low levels of expenditure across projects;
poor planning and lack of leadership on the part of the national project managers;
Late submission and, consequently, late approval of business plans delayed transfer of funds from DoE to provinces, and a lack of clear vision on the part of the DoE accounted for some of the delays. Across provinces complaints were levelled against Quality Assurance, Inclusive Education and School Effectiveness and Development Support.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that the coordinators need to call regular meetings where the procurement section is represented. Regarding alleged lack of leadership from the DoE, the monitoring team promised to report to the Director-General and Senior Management with a view to improving the planning process, co-ordination and monitoring of activities by the DoE.
Insufficient logistical resources
Observation
Some of the provinces indicated a lack of logistical support, such as vehicles, computers and administration support. The coordinators explained that at times it was difficult to monitor projects and even to provide support, as there were not enough cars in the province to make this possible. They also complained that as project managers they did not have administrative support and were therefore forced to do everything - even the most basic functions - themselves.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that conditional grant projects should be integrated in the line budget so that those resources available for the core business of the provincial department could, over time, be extended to cover conditional grants. Provincial departments should ensure that during the planning phase all of the required resources for successful implementation of a project are budgeted and planned for.
Restructuring
Observation
Some provinces, such as the Eastern Cape, North West and Limpopo provinces, blamed delayed implementation of projects on the restructuring that was taking place in the provinces. The coordinators explained that some of the projects were managed by new people, as there had been a lot of staff movement in the provinces as a result of restructuring.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that, when allocating project management responsibilities to staff members, the likely duration of their availability should be considered. Furthermore, succession and handover processes should be planned and should be aligned with line function responsibilities.
Staff turnover
Observation
Provinces such as Gauteng complained that a high staff turnover was to blame for delays in implementation. Coordinators complained that, as a result of staff turnover, new people managed projects every year, and this impeded continuity.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that conditional grants should be integrated in the line budget, so that when one person leaves or is re-deployed, the Directorate or Unit would ensure that the project is not interrupted.
Monitoring and evaluation of projects
Observation
It was evident during the monitoring process that most provinces did not monitor or evaluate projects, although these aspects are indicated in the business plan.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that provincial departments should monitor, and report to the Heads of Departments on, all activities.
Under-utilisation of business plans
Observation
In a number of provinces, it was clear that the approved business plans were not used or regularly consulted. It was clear that the business plans were not used during implementation and this gave an impression that they had been compiled only to access funding.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that the provinces should use the business plans actively and should ensure that activities in the business plans are implemented.
Delays: provincial Treasuries
Observation
Most provinces complained that although the DoE had transferred the funds to the provinces in April 2000, the transfers from provincial Treasuries to provincial departments took a long time and this delayed implementation.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that the coordinators should explore the possibility of having meetings with the Chief Financial Officers and the provincial Treasuries’ officials to facilitate communication.
Non-payment of services
Observation
Managers / coordinators attributed delays in implementation to delays, on the part of the provincial education departments, in effecting payment for services rendered by providers. One province indicated that because of delays in payment for services, service providers were not keen to offer their services and this affected the quality of the service they ultimately received.
Recommendation
The DoE recommends that there should be regular feedback between project managers and the procurement section in the provinces.
Assessment of impact
The following table sets out the generic projects that were implemented during the 2001/2002 financial year. The overall impact of each project is reflected in the table. However, the projects reflected in the table below are a summary of all the projects implemented by the various provinces. The projects are not presented as shown in Section 3, as most of them have been duplicated. For example, several provinces mention the same activities and impact under School Beautification (Engendering Community Pride in Schools) as under Safe School projects. The same goes for the following projects: Educational Management Development and Governance, School Management and Governance, School Effectiveness and Teacher Development.
A detailed statement of impact for each project in each province is shown in Section 3 of this report.
No |
Pgm |
Generic project |
Impact |
1 |
2 |
COLTS |
|
2 |
2 |
Curriculum 2005/ OBE |
|
4 |
2 |
Education Management Development |
|
5 |
2 |
Focus on Mathematics, Science and Technology |
|
6 |
2 |
General Education and Training Certificate |
|
7 |
2 |
Public schools on private property and farm schools |
|
8 |
2 |
Quality assurance |
|
9 |
2 |
Engendering community pride in schools |
|
13 |
2 |
School management and teacher development |
|
14 |
2 |
School safety |
|
20 |
4 |
Further Education & Training (Colleges, Trapped Schools, School-based) |
|
21 |
4 |
Matric intervention |
|
22 |
4 |
Talent search (School Choral Eisteddfod) |
|
24 |
5 |
District improvement programmes |
|
26 |
5 |
Education Management Information System |
|
27 |
5 |
Financial management and administration |
|
Consolidated recommendations for further use of conditional grants
Need to tighten planning regarding tender procedures
It was observed that the officials take too long to prepare documentation, including tender specifications, and in the end blame lack of delivery on the tender process. It is recommended that the planning process be tightened to allow enough time to prepare documentation but also to include a procurement official as part of the planning process to ultimately improve the implementation of projects.
Improvement of management systems
Effective management systems need to be put in place to cover the period from the production of tender specifications to the timeous payment of service providers when a service has been rendered. Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) for management and planning purposes, improved systems for learner support materials, supply and retrieval and financial management systems for effective financial management are also important and need to receive urgent attention.
Moratorium on spending in some of the provinces
Urgent attention needs to be paid to the issue of the moratorium on spending that has been declared in some of the provinces, as this hampers the implementation of conditional grant projects. A moratorium on spending is an indication of poor cash-flow management and financial systems, which will ultimately lead to very low expenditure and a low impact being made by projects.
Low or under-expenditure
The issue of low or under-expenditure across projects in all provinces needs urgent attention. This aspect can be greatly influenced by improving the quality and time of the planning process in the provinces. It is suggested that the planning process with regard to conditional grants be integrated as far as possible with the provincial department’s planning, and also with the operational planning of directorates in the provinces.
Sustainability of projects
In the past few years the focus of conditional grants has to a great extent shifted from expenditure on projects to making an impact and the sustainability of projects. It has also been suggested that projects should run for a longer period of time, rather than only on an annual basis. It is therefore recommended that projects be planned for a three-year period, thus ensuring a sustained effort in the education system. It is further recommended that all projects be based on a clear needs assessment before implementation can start. The aforementioned document could then form part of the business plan to be submitted to the DoE for evaluation and approval.
Duplication of activities
The duplication of activities, both at national and at provincial level, needs urgent attention. The DoE recommends that a national workshop be held on an annual basis, at which participants from the DoE and the provinces come together to plan and work on business plans for the following year. This type of workshop will not only allow the DoE to communicate clearly the focus and priorities of the DoE, but will also allow for the sharing of experiences between groups working on similar projects.
Dedicated capacity
One of the concerns raised by project managers in the provinces has been the issue of integrating conditional grants with departmental activities at operational level. Often, because the management of conditional grants is not included in the day-to-day activities and job descriptions of officials, this task is considered to be an add-on to their "normal" work. It is therefore recommended that the approval processes for all funding be integrated as far as possible and that the responsibilities linked to the management of conditional grants form part of all job descriptions.
Improvement of communication
While communications have improved over the past few years, the process is still not effective. Communications often do not reach the relevant officials or reach the relevant officials too late. The DoE recommends that a business process of mapping communications in each province be launched in order to improve the current structure and, ultimately, also the quality of planning, implementation and monitoring of projects.
Focus on monitoring
Still the greatest weakness of the conditional grant projects is the lack of evidence that these projects are achieving their goals and objectives and are actually having an impact. Monitoring is still one of the lowest priorities of project managers, yet without data on how the project is doing, it is difficult if not impossible to adjust implementation strategies to improve outcomes. The DoE recommends that a definite effort be made by both national and provincial officials to improve the monitoring of projects, which should include regular monitoring reports, analysis of reports and monitoring visits, and also the adjusting of strategies to improve implementation.
Conditions of the grant
A conditional grant can be seen as a special purpose grant that comes with strong conditions that govern the flow of funds to provincial education departments. The conditions state that funds may not be used to cover any form of recurrent cost, e.g. salaries, or for paying for equipment. The main condition, however, is that funds may be spent only in accordance with an approved business plan based on specific priorities. It has, however, been noticed that project managers do not necessarily adhere to these conditions, even though the conditions have been communicated to them on numerous occasions. The DoE recommends that a clear mechanism, based on the PFMA and the DORA, be put in place to deal with project managers who do not adhere to these conditions.
Approval of deviations
It has been noted that project managers deviate from the original and approved business plan without following the proper approval process. The DoE recommends that the approval process be discussed in detail with all provincial coordinators and that it be made very clear to them that the information should be forwarded to all project managers. It is further recommended that a clear mechanism be put in place to deal with project managers who do not follow the proper approval process.
Effect of restructuring
The restructuring in certain provinces has affected not only the management of education in those provinces, but also the success with which projects have been implemented. Even though this issue can be managed only on a much higher level, the DoE recommends that conditional grants be seen and managed as part of the operational activities of directorates and not as an add-on to the daily activities. This will ensure that dedicated capacity is available to continue with implementation even when restructuring is taking place.
Roll-overs as part of project funds
Specific rules need to be adhered to when roll-over funds are used as a supplement for project funds. In too many instances, roll-over funds are seen as additional funding that will be available even when poor planning still prevails. The DoE recommends that the conditions for using roll-over funds be discussed with the national and provincial Treasuries and then be communicated to all project managers. It is further recommended that a clear mechanism be put in place to deal with project managers who do not adhere to the conditions stipulated for the use of roll-over funds.
Escalating cost of subsistence and travel
It has been noted with great concern that the cost of subsistence and travel in connection with the attendance of workshops has escalated inordinately in the past few years, without clear data being available about the impact that these workshops have on service delivery.
Activities should focus on bringing about improvements in the education system. Funds should therefore be allocated and approved by the Head of the Education Departments in each province in a way that will contribute to this objective.
Conclusion
The monitoring of conditional grant projects in the provinces was conducted as a requirement of the DORA of 2002. Although the Act requires regular monitoring of conditional grant projects, very little attention has been paid to monitoring since the inception of the programme and this seems to have led to unguided implementation and under-expenditure.
The provincial monitoring and impact assessment exercises in 2002 were the first such exercises and the DoE Monitoring Team was unable to visit the sites where the actual implementation took place, owing to time constraints and the way in which the schedule was structured. The schedule of visits to the provinces by the DoE Monitoring Team was structured to meet with the project managers in groups and to provide them with the background and conditions of the grants and to give them an opportunity to present reports on their projects. These reports included challenges that they encountered in the implementation of their projects. The meetings seem to have helped, as most of the project managers in the nine provinces said that, for the first time, they were beginning to understand the nature of the grant and the conditions around the utilisation of the allocated funds.
Despite the challenges and problematic issues that have been highlighted in this report, there have been tremendous improvements in the provincial education system, such as the reduction of criminal activities in the targeted areas and the improvement of matric results. There is also evidence of active participation by the communities in matters related to education and schools. The challenges referred to in this report can be addressed if the DoE and the provincial departments ensure that the programme forms part of the core business of the department and that the necessary human capacity and skills are available to realise the objectives of the conditional grant programme.
Section 2 - Report on provincial visits
Introduction
In carrying out its monitoring activities, the DoE team focused on achievements, challenges, concerns raised by individual project managers and deviations from the original business plans. Recommendations were made per province.
Monitoring report processes
The task of producing this report was carried out according to a formal approach. The Directorate: Development Support involved all nine provincial education departments in its drafting and production.
In gathering the necessary information the following processes were followed:
Letters were sent to the Heads of Education Departments on 24 May 2002, informing them about the monitoring visits.
Letters were sent to the provincial coordinators on 24 May 2002, informing them about the monitoring visits and processes to be followed.
The information used to compile the Monitoring Report on the Utilisation of Conditional Grants was gathered from:
Presentations given by project managers at the provincial monitoring visits;
Progress Reports;
Annual Reports;
Business Plans;
Presentations given at the inter-provincial meetings; and
Presentations given at workshops.
Monitoring visit attendance
The monitoring teams visited provincial departments over a period of five months; the dates and attendance are shown in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1: Dates of monitoring visits to provinces and number of officials present
Province |
Date of visit |
No. of officials present |
KwaZulu-Natal |
7 May 2002 |
4 DoE |
Eastern Cape |
15 May 2002 |
4 DoE |
Northern Cape |
20 May 2002 |
3 DoE |
Western Cape |
13 June 2002 |
4 DoE |
Gauteng |
20 June 2002 |
3 DoE |
Mpumalanga |
9 July 2002 |
3 DoE |
Free State |
18 July 2002 |
3 DoE |
Limpopo |
30 July 2002 |
3 DoE |
North West |
13 September 2002 |
3 DoE |
Financial allocations per province per project
The budget allocations to the various conditional grant projects within each province are reflected in Table 2.2 below.
Table 2.2: Budget allocations to the various conditional grant projects within each province
Province |
Project |
Allocation |
Expenditure |
Balance |
EASTERN CAPE |
Matric Intervention |
R4,000,000 |
Data not available for individual projects |
Data not available for individual projects |
FREE STATE |
School Effectiveness |
R5,000,461 |
Data not available for individual projects |
Data not available for individual projects |
GAUTENG |
School Beautification |
R2,016,450 |
R2,006,166 |
R10,251 |
KWAZULU-NATAL |
COLTS |
R2,862,400 |
R2,344,283 |
R518,117 |
LIMPOPO |
Education Management Development |
R2,964,00 |
R2,191,755 |
R772,244 |
MPUMALANGA |
EMD |
R1,784,800, |
Data not available for individual projects |
Data not available for individual projects |
NORTH WEST |
Quality Assurance |
R1,534,200 |
R1,539,847 |
-R5,647 |
NORTHERN CAPE |
School Effectiveness |
R780,000 |
R670,778 |
R31,466 |
WESTERN CAPE |
Matric Intervention |
R4,682,000 |
R2,682,000 |
R2,352,000 |
|
2001/2002 ALLOCATION |
R213,000,000 |
|
|
|
ROLL-OVERS |
R24,947,000 |
|
|
|
TOTAL ALLOCATION AND ROLL-OVERS |
R237,947,000 |
R174,647,000 |
R237,947,000 |
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
The project was not able to access the allocated budget, owing to incorrect codes. The tender for the main part of the budget was approved only in September 2001. Delays in the processing of payments by procurement section affected expenditure levels. Changes in top management structure of the province affected success in the province. |
|
|
|
Procurement of goods and services was a great challenge. The Finance Section placed a moratorium on spending, which hampered the implementation of the project. |
|
|
|
Payment processes caused delays in the implementation of the project. |
|
|
100 Schools in Umtata were targeted and successful advocacy campaigns were launched. School Safety Committees were trained in these schools. Children were trained in self-defence. Partnerships with the SAPS were formalised. An anti-drug campaign was conducted by the SAPS. |
|
|
|
|
Activities on the project were scaled down to work within the allocated budget. The compilation of specifications for the tender was a major problem. Prospective tenderers would do presentations only late in September 2002. Two training sessions were cancelled owing to the unavailability of supply numbers from the service provider. No expenditure has occurred and the project is not making any progress. |
|
|
All district support staff in all regions except the Kokstad and Lusikisiki areas were trained in School Self–evaluation. The project was allocated R2 million, but the province was able to spend only R1.1 million. |
Owing to the limited number of personnel only a few schools were targeted for Whole School Evaluation and Systemic Evaluation. A major constraint was the availability of personnel to transfer the training to the relevant people. |
|
|
R4 million was allocated to the project. |
|
|
|
|
The non-availability of officials to manage the project posed a challenge. |
|
|
The project was allocated R2.1million and the province was able to spend only R900 000. |
The budget for the project was allocated only in August 2001, which hampered project implementation. Service providers were not willing to provide a service, owing to previous non-payment for services. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
|
The training of School Management Teams is not aligned to the provincial Skills Development Plan, as the Skills Development Committee is still finalising the training programme and consulting with the unions in this regard. Monitoring and support activities were not part of the Work-breakdown-structure and thus received very little attention. Skills Development Levy funds were difficult to access. |
|
|
|
10 educators from 10 schools that performed well were selected to participate in the programme. 71 schools were targeted in the nodal areas, but not all of them were reached. Learners’ attendance was satisfactory. 4 928 learners and 106 educators attended. Equipment such as photocopiers and Mathematics, Science and Biology Kits were provided to dysfunctional schools and two resource centres were established in the nodal area known as Thabo Mofutsanyane. |
The use of conditional grant funds to give incentives to educators acting as facilitators at targeted schools posed a challenge. Transportation of learners to venues where supplementary classes were held posed a challenge. The attendance at workshops by educators of targeted schools was poor. Educators should have been trained in the use of the Science Kits. |
|
|
|
|
The activities in the business plan were not carried out, as the project manager was still awaiting guidelines from the DoE. Monitoring and evaluation of HIV/AIDS was to be handed over to universities. Providing training before the survey could be concluded posed a challenge. Funds for the project were to be moved to other projects, as there was very little implementation. |
|
|
Systemic Evaluation & Whole School Evaluation |
|
Focusing all resources on nodal areas posed a challenge to the province, as there were schools outside of the nodal areas that needed more attention than those identified in the nodal areas. The issue of duplication of projects posed a challenge to the province. For example, the project manager responsible for this project realised that the implementation of School Development Plans was the responsibility of another directorate. |
|
|
|
A provincial Adopt-a-Cop-Campaign and a Youth Crime Prevention Programme were launched. Posters were printed and distributed to schools. The programme inculcated a strong sense of community ownership of schools, with the results that acts of vandalism decreased in the schools. The programme created a safe and tolerant learning environment that celebrates innocence and values human dignity. This was achieved through conducting workshops for School Governing Bodies and community leaders. Alarm systems were installed in hot spot schools to curb vandalism. A toll free number was created for ease in reporting acts of vandalism, crime and corruption and for offering support to victims of abuse. |
It was not clear whether correct procedures were followed when deviating from the planned activities. The new project manager needed support and training. The use of resources to implement the project effectively posed a challenge to the province. The project even overspent. |
|
|
|
|
The issue of giving incentives to officials in the employ of the department posed a challenge to the province. There were no qualified people to give accreditation to learners, as evaluators were engaged in activities organized by the DoE. Some of the activities were cancelled at the eleventh hour and this caused confusion. Lack of participation from former model C schools posed a challenge for the province. The DoE is still grappling with the issue of introducing Indigenous games at schools. Swimming courses were not held as a result of inadequate resources in the province. |
|
|
|
The project manager was disillusioned by this fact and also by the allocation given to the project by the province. |
The project manager was disillusioned because he could not procure the hardware using conditional grant funds. |
|
|
|
|
The ECD unit was new and understaffed. Sustainability posed a challenge to the province. There was a shortfall of 44 ECD sites. Electronic payment posed yet another challenge to the province. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 Schools received training in organic food garden skills. 721 trees were planted at Katlehong schools. 12 Schools received slab paving. |
|
|
|
|
Figures indicating numbers of schools targeted and officials trained were not available at the time of reporting. |
|
|
A three-day workshop was held for HODs to develop a year plan and policy. A three-day workshop on development of weekly plans was held for Educators. |
|
|
|
Two Secondary Schools for Grades 10 – to 12 each received training on Fitting and Turning. 55 Schools in Katlehong each received two Electronics kits. Technology drawings were supplied to learners in Grades 10 to 12. |
|
|
|
Schools were provided with Mathematics kits. Some project managers conducted baseline surveys to assess the needs as part of their project planning process. |
|
|
|
Mathematics resources were supplied to five High Schools identified for continuous project. |
|
|
|
120 female learners at Roodevallei were trained in learning and study skills. 180 female learners at Star Schools were trained. 440 learners were trained on RMIP project. |
|
|
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
COLTS |
|
Delays in issuing order numbers led to cancellation of planned activities and payments of accounts were delayed or not made. The long distances between schools in rural areas forced the province to hire cars for use by officials and this was not in accordance with the business plan. Clustering of schools affected the amount of funding allocated to activities. Poor time management and limitations in terms of policies on travelling led to over-expenditure and this affected service delivery in the province. |
|
|
|
No verbal or written report given, as the regional coordinator was not present. |
|||
EMG |
|
|
|
|
FET |
|
Lack of clarity on the programme and poor communication led to negative responses from officials concerned. |
|
|
|
These schools were visited on a regular basis . Subject committees were established. A partnership with Ukhozi FM was established and the programme was allocated a time slot that coincided with teaching time for various learning areas. 41 schools were used as pilots to assess the impact of the matric intervention strategies on the targeted schools in the province. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Whole School Effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
School Governance Unit |
|
The low levels of literacy among the members of the school governing bodies hindered the effective governing of schools by the SGBs. |
|
|
|
|
|||
Coordination |
|
Preparations for the development of 3-year cycle business plans would start in July 2002. The focus for 2002 would be on on-site monitoring. |
|
REGION |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
COLTS initiatives seem to be duplicated in most regions. |
|
|
Several workshops were held on general accounting procedures. Most of the district officials were trained in IT and were awarded certificates. |
|
|
|
The region developed a database for projects Project managers kept commitment registers and procedure manuals. The focus for 2002 was on schools that achieved below 50% in Grade 12 results. |
Time-consuming procurement procedures delayed implementation. |
|
|
No verbal or written report was given, as the official concerned was not present. |
||
|
|
Over-expenditure occurred in some projects. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
There was a lack of movement regarding FET activities. The use of incorrect codes caused problems. Difficulties in getting reports from coordinators in time. Difficulties in receiving ordered equipment in good time. Lack of transport for monitoring and evaluation purposes. Procurement problems were encountered, owing to poor planning. |
|
|
|
Delays in issuing order numbers caused further delays. Delays in the payment of service providers caused friction between the department and the consultants. |
|
Recommendations
The following concerns were raised:
The sustainability of Curriculum 2005, as the programme relied more on conditional grants than on the line budget.
Lack of coordination in planning with regard to conditional grants and voted budget.
Lack of consultation at various levels when allocating funds to priorities. There is a need for the province to improve conditional grants coordination between the provincial office, the regions and the districts.
From these and other issues the following recommendations have been made.
The need to rationalise initiatives to avoid duplications and overlap in the 2003/2004 plans.
Decisions taken by Senior Management with regard to conditional grants initiatives and allocation of funds should be informed by what is happening at schools, and relevant stakeholders should be involved.
Clear job descriptions and appointment of officials already coordinating initiatives should be formalised so as to avoid confusion as regards reporting and accountability.
There is a need for dedicated personnel to manage the ECG projects, as the current officials are overloaded and conditional grant projects "become an add-on".
The need to establish an evaluation team in the province to ensure that business plans are in line with the national and provincial priorities and with National Treasury Regulations before forwarding them to the DoE for approval.
Officials should adhere to the planned activities and budgets as per approved business plan and approval for deviation should be obtained.
Deviations should be reported and appropriate procedures should be followed.
The province should ensure that all the mandatory priorities are planned and implemented.
Conditional grants should gradually be integrated into the core business of the province to ensure sustainability once the conditional grant project is discontinued.
The province should desist from procuring physical resources with this conditional grant as this goes against the conditions of the grant.
Limpopo: 30 July 2002
Provincial projects
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
100% expenditure of 2001/02 funds. 8% of the allocated 2002/03 budget spent to date. Low expenditure could be attributed to incorrect debiting. |
|
|
|
Approval sought to reallocate funds to other activities. |
|
|
Trained educators in the implementation of OBE in Grades 7, 8 and 9. 59% of the allocated budget spent to date. |
Wrong coding distorts expenditure figures. |
|
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
An electronic LSM retrieval system is being developed. Retrieval models from other provinces are studied. More funds are spent on catering. 1% of the R1,2 million budget for 2002/03 spent to date. |
|
|
Two provincial conferences were held. Trained RCLs and SGBs. 55% of the budget spent in 2001/02. |
|
|
|
21,7% of the budget spent in 2001/02. Most of the unspent funds are commitments. 7% of the 2002/2003 budget has already been spent. |
Lack of coordination of training programmes. Training of educators during holidays requires a three-month notice period. The report focused more on DAS rather than on Whole School Development as per business plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SGB policy developed. Travel and Tourism school established and training material developed. Policy on Learnerships developed. |
Plans in place for implementation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60% of the budget spent to date. |
|
|
|
50 schools participated in music competitions. 100% expenditure. |
|
|
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
|
This activity is not in line with the conditions set for the utilisation of conditional grants. The province blames the DoE for having allowed this in the approved business plan. |
|
|
The District where the head office is situated, has no subject advisors and has to depend on those of an adjacent district office, which is 140 km away. There are only a few suitable venues for workshops in the area and some of them are not prepared to accept government orders. |
This purchase is not in line with the conditions set for the utilisation of conditional grants. |
|
|
|
|
|
2 961 Grade 5 teachers and 2 511 Grade 9 teachers were trained as part of a strategy of empowering teachers. OBE material and policy documents were photocopied and these, as well as OBE related kits, were distributed to 140 subject advisors and 2 292 school sites. The implementation of the project was monitored at 2 292 school sites. R1 675 000 was allocated to the project and R2 043 651,48 was spent, which means that there was an over–expenditure of R368 651,48 on the project. IMPACT The results of learners were improved, owing to the OBE material that was distributed. The documented learner content knowledge improved from 30% to 80%. Teachers made excellent progress, as can be seen in questionnaires completed before and after the workshops. The "not confident" percentage decreased to "0", while the "very confident" increased by over 60%. |
The provincial department’s policy of starting the workshops at 13:30 was impacting on the timeframes of the workshops. |
|
|
Number of trapped schools decreased from 100 in 2001 to 88 in 2002. Pass percentage in the province increased by 4.2% at the end of 2001. All trapped schools received copies of the Rainbow Guides, learning support materials and Oxford atlases. R600 000 was allocated to the project and R925 114,20 was spent, which means that there was an over-expenditure of R325 114,20 on the project. IMPACT The impact of the project can be seen in the extent of achievement of activities. |
More or less 95% of the budget was spent on resources for schools, e.g. study guides, videotapes for training and duplicating paper. |
|
|
Publication of new names for merged colleges. Consultative seminar on draft merger plans. Successful workshop on Environment in Education approaches in the FET Curriculum was held. Total allocation: R1 115 000. Expenditure: R1 146 848.65. There was an over-expenditure of R31 848,65 on the project. The impact of the project is not yet clear, as the merger structure has only recently been finalised. |
|
This purchase is not in line with the conditions set for the utilisation of conditional grants. |
|
|
|
This purchase is not in line with the conditions set for the utilisation of conditional grants. |
|
|
|
This purchase is not in line with the conditions set for the utilisation of conditional grants. |
|
|
Training was not coordinated at school level by the provincial department. |
|
|
279 TV/Video combinations; 119 electrical typewriters; 378 CD/Radio/Tape combinations; 673 overhead projectors; 78 overhead projector screens; 88 copy printers; 114 photocopiers; 57 fax machines; 40 printers; PA systems; and 144 computers and printers. 36 managers received computer training. 60 managers were trained in school and self–evaluation. 20 district officials received training in project management. The project was allocated R5 542 000 and R8 194 171,16 was spent, which means that there was an over expenditure of R2 652 171,16 on the project. IMPACT Improved teacher performance as a result of training in Mathematics, Science, Biology and English. A significant improvement in Grade 12 results in DIP districts. LSM materials are being made available at schools, owing to the supply of photocopiers. Fax machines improved communication between schools and districts. The supply of radio/cassette combinations to schools has supplemented teaching and increased educator effectiveness. Computers have improved information management at all offices. |
|
|
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
The project manager struggled to find consultants for WSE workshops and the attendance of the SGBs was very poor. Comprehensive data on the quality of teaching in schools could not be captured, owing to the fact that the unit did not have adequate facilities. There was under-expenditure as a result of not hiring consultants as planned and using school halls instead of hiring venues. This saving was used to procure computers for schools. The clustering of schools for capacity building purposes led to under-expenditure. Monitoring and evaluation only took place in the final phase and spending was done in the last three months. 12 computers were purchased with savings realised through using officials in the employ of the Department instead of consultants to facilitate workshops and using school halls instead of hired halls. |
|
|
|
The constraints noted under Systemic Evaluation were arranged under two separate headings, i.e. Inclusive Education and mainstream activities. The main constraint concerning Inclusive Education was the fact that the Pilot Study report had not been received from the DoE , even after several attempts were made. The main survey was also postponed until February 2002. The main constraints concerning mainstream activities included the fact that not enough information was transferred to district officials after the training sessions on inclusive education, which were held in Pretoria. Also, the advocacy workshops were held in only 24 schools, owing to time constraints and the fact that there were not enough support staff members. Implementation of the project was difficult, owing to the project being coordinated by the DoE and decisions to implement being forwarded to the province. Human resources seem to be a problem in the province, with only one person working on the project. Communication between the DoE and the province posed a challenge. |
|
|
All Grade 5 and Grade 9 educators in the province were trained in the implementation of Learning Area Guidelines, Management Assessment and in the selection of appropriate content. The training was followed up by the Learning Area Managers in the district, who consolidated the above training by offering classroom-based support for educators. The project formed part of the core responsibilities of district officials, as a result of which the implementation of this project went smoothly seeing that the officials viewed the project as part of their line function and not as an add-on function. The training offered the educators confidence to teach in new ways. |
The delays in paying providers for their service and inadequate means of transportation were constraints recognised on the project. The number of responsibilities for office-bound officials was sometimes a problem, as they had to juggle three or four competing functions at the same time. Provisioning posed a major challenge for the province. |
|
|
|
Lack of capacity to manage the project posed a challenge As there was no dedicated capacity to deal with school safety, the officials felt overloaded as they had to juggle the project and also deal with their line function responsibilities. Baseline study information was not available for project and progress could therefore not be accurately measured for 2001/02 financial year. Baseline information was however available for the 2002/03 financial year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pass rates for dysfunctional and under-performing schools and subjects were raised to 60% instead of the original 0% - 20% for dysfunctional schools and 21% - 50% for under-performing schools. Educators for Grades 10 to 12 also received in-service training in syllabus-related skills. A thorough statistical analysis of the Senior Certificate results was made, which culminated in a measurable evaluation of the Programme. Learning support materials were supplied to specific schools and educators. IMPACT The general Senior Certificate pass rate improved by 12% which is 8% higher than expected. |
The cost of distributing learner support materials in a large province was a constraint and challenge. The general feeling was that quantitatively the required results were exceeded, but serious efforts would have to be made to improve the quality of the results. |
|
|
Training sessions and workshops were held to enhance the capacity of all units to cost their own plans. IMPACT 94% of the schools in the province were accorded Section 21 status. Certain planned activities on the project were integrated into the line functions of the Department, which had definite benefits for the project. |
The current project manager took over in February, when the project was in the process of being finalised. |
|
NAME OF PROJECT |
ACHIEVEMENTS |
CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS |
DEVIATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited capacity in specialised learning areas posed a challenge for the province. Procurement procedures caused delays in implementation. Insufficient logistical support posed a challenge to the province. Disparity between the financial year and the academic year resulted in an implementation period of effectively only eight months. |
|
|
Appropriate training materials and guidelines were designed and translated into three official languages and copies were provided to schools. Implementation was consolidated through on-site visits and workshops. Grade 9 teachers were trained to implement Curriculum 2005 in 2001. Benchmarks for the consolidation of the Foundation Phase for Literacy and numeracy were provided to primary schools. CATS and EATS workshops involving 150 schools were conducted. Booklets on LSM procurement were designed and distributed to schools. |
|
|
|
Relevant learner support materials were designed and distributed to schools. Workshops were conducted for Grade 3 educators. With the available human resources, the province focused its attention on the Foundation Phase, particularly the Sciences. In addition, the Thlatloga project was used to provide support to a limited number of educators in the rural areas of the province. |
Inappropriate long-term planning, incomplete policy development and crisis management on the part of the DoE hampered implementation. Limited human resource capacity in Arts and Culture, Economic Management Sciences, Life Skills Orientation and MLMMS posed a challenge. Time-consuming tender procedures, insufficient logistical support and a massive overload of initiatives from the DoE contributed to delays in implementation. |
|
|
One workshop was conducted for these learners. Training materials were designed, developed and distributed before training. The Education Management and Development Centre planned and provided support for these learners. |
Insufficient logistical support system also posed a challenge. |
|
|
The School Governing Bodies were provided with training on governance and other related matters. The province planned, designed and implemented a programme promoting discipline in schools and, in particular, assisting educators in dealing with classroom discipline. |
Delays in identifying the district coordinator resulted in delayed implementation. |
|
|
30 Learner Support Officers used the campaign as an advocacy for "Back to School" drive. Flyers and letters were forwarded to schools to enhance the campaign. Shopping centres in Mitchell’s Plain were used to create awareness of the importance of school attendance. Parents’ meeting were used to build awareness for SASA and, in particular, school attendance. Learner Support Officials were trained in a variety of matters including, but not limited to, counselling, conflict resolution, support for learners who are abused, dealing with trauma and supporting learners at risk. After-school activities were held for learners at risk. The programme identified 397 cases of truancy in Mitchell’s Plain and 214 cases in Khayelisha and, by the end of the programme, truancy rates had been reduced by 50%. Greater awareness was created with regard to the importance of school attendance. |
The fact that the programme was funded only for one year posed a challenge, as the impact of the programme could only be determined after at least three years. |
|
|
|
The provincial policy on conducting workshops after school hours or over the weekend posed a challenge. The lack of sufficient capacity to facilitate at the workshops, coupled with the many training sites, posed a challenge. |
|
|
A manual on basic financial systems was developed and 254 schools were targeted. 663 schools have become Section 21 Schools and the remaining 789 are receiving attention. |
|
|
|
235 learners attended the school Leadership Programme. 25 principals attended a Project Management Programme. Contracts were awarded for the development of a course on gender-based violence and how this problem could be managed in schools. Two people have been appointed on a temporary basis to manage the project. |
|
|
|
Procurement processes have just started. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations
There was a need for the implementation of the programme be extended to Worcester as well.
Project planning should be over a period of three years, even though the implementation of programmes is planned for a year.
Province requested that templates should not be changed on an ad hoc basis.
The provincial project managers should inform the DoE project managers if there are any deviations that affect their projects.
There was a need for the involvement of the community, as they are the beneficiaries.
It was proposed that the province should explore alternative ways of procuring hardware for EMIS, because very little money was allocated to this project and because hardware could not be procured with this conditional grant. The province indicated that it was unfair of the DoE to expect provinces to implement Programme 5 without the required equipment.
EMIS project manager, Dr J Wilkinson, was requested to inform the DoE whether the funds allocated to his project were to be transferred to another project.
Ms Samuels, Director: ECD at the DoE , should be consulted on matters raised concerning the ECD project.
Section 3 - Assessment of impact
Introduction
The Report includes information on the type of grant, total allocations and transfer trends. It also contains a summary of projects per province, the extent to which the projects have been achieved and their impact. This information is provided in the tables in paragraph 3.3. The main focus is on the Assessment of impact and the information which appears in the Report on the Monitoring of the Utilisation of Conditional Grants Project in paragraph 2.2 of this document is repeated in this Section to contextualise statements on impact assessment.
Processes
The task of producing the report was carried out according to a formal approach. The Directorate: Development Support involved all nine provincial education departments in drafting and producing the Report on the Assessment of the Impact of the 2001/2002 Conditional Grants Projects. In compiling the report the following processes were followed:
Letters were sent to provincial coordinators in June 2002, requesting them to submit conditional grants 2001/2002 Annual Reports.
Provincial coordinators were requested to present their reports at the inter-provincial workshop of 2 July 2002 for critical analysis.
Coordinators were requested to submit the revised copies of the Annual Reports.
The Draft Annual Report was sent to provinces on 18 September 2002 for comments.
Amendments were made and the report was forwarded to coordinators on 24 October 2002.
The report was presented and approved by the Sub-Committee on Conditional Grants at the inter-provincial meeting of 30 October 2002.
The Reports provided by the provincial coordinators contain insufficient information on the assessment of impact, even though the coordinators were requested several times to revise their report in order to include information on the impact of the conditional grant project. Some coordinators indicated that they could not provide such information, as they were new coordinators, and others indicated that it would take them a long time to gather such information, as the process required a systematic study.
Expenditure trends for 1988/99, 1999/2000, 2000/01, 2001/02
The table in paragraph 3.2 presents the allocations and expenditure on the conditional grant project implemented in the 2001/2002 financial year. The report was compiled in accordance with a requirement of the DORA, 2002, namely that, together with their Annual Reports and Financial Statements, the transferring and receiving departments must also submit information on conditional grants to National Treasury.
Table 3.1: Expenditure trends
YEAR |
ALLOCATION |
EXPENDITURE |
% SPENT |
AMOUNT UNSPENT |
% UNSPENT |
1998/99 |
R149,541,000 |
R26,029,000 |
17,4% |
R123,512,000 |
82,6% |
1999/00 |
R192,000,000 |
R96,790,000 |
50,4% |
R95,210,000 |
49,6% |
2000/01 |
R253,987,000 |
R133,042,000 |
52,4% |
R120,945,000 |
47,6% |
2001/02 |
R213,000,000 |
R161,374,000 |
75,76% |
R 51,626,000 |
24,24% |
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
|
|
|
Quality Assurance (DAS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further education and training |
|
|
|
|
|
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organisational effectiveness |
|
|
Further education and training |
|
|
Organisational effectiveness of the national and provincial Education Departments |
|
|
Priorities |
Project |
Extent of achievement and impact |
|
Beautification of twelve public schools: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-site visits supporting all subjects. Developed and distributed Subject Guidelines and Year Planners. Conducted and moderated common provincial June SC examination. Conducted June teachers’ holiday workshops. Conducted September workshops for learners. Conducted and moderated common provincial September SC examination. General pass rate improved throughout province. Designed subject files and provided them to 60% of the schools. Moderated all schools’ Year Marks. ACE courses in collaboration with tertiary institutions for Biology, Mathematics, Physical Science and English involving 120 teachers were successful. IMPACT 29 Senior Certificate subjects were offered in the seven EMDCs, to which all Grade 12 teachers from +/- 360 high schools were invited. Ongoing visits with, special focus on the identified 57 high schools, took place throughout the year. All 360 high schools were provided with appropriate subject teacher manuals and Year Planner laminated wall charts 84 high schools participated in the workshop to enhance common norms and standards; teachers were empowered by being exposed to common standard setting, marking and moderation processes. EMDCs conducted five-day workshops for selected subjects during the first week of the holiday to improve teachers’ subject-base knowledge. Mass tutoring held for learners in identified cluster areas to prepare for the final Senior Certificate examination. All identified schools were provided with subject files containing syllabi, circulars, copies of recent senior certificate examination papers and relevant subject guidelines. All subjects in all 360 high schools were moderated on a one-to-one ratio. 150 teachers were targeted, 139 of which were completing the courses offered by the universities of Stellenbosch, Cape Town and the Western Cape. All +/- 1 340 primary schools were provided with copies of guidelines for Numeracy, Literacy & Life Skills; all +/- 3 500 Foundation Phase teachers were introduced to these guidelines by cluster workshops. Training materials and support guidelines were developed and dry-runs were conducted, involving all 92 Curriculum Advisors for each of the eight learning areas; five-week programme to conclude training during the third and fourth terms involving all +/- 1 400 schools offering the curriculum. IMPACT General provincial pass rate improved by 1%. The identified under-performing schools (< 60%) in 2000 performed well in the 2001 Senior Certificate Examinations, with an average improved pass rate of 4% overall. The performance of the schools varied from < 3% to >20% improvement. |
|
|
Norms and Standards booklets were designed and workshops involving all primary schools were conducted. Consolidated implementation by on-site visits and cluster workshops. Designed training materials and conducted workshops for implementation, involving all primary schools. Consolidated implementation by on-site visits and cluster workshops. Training materials were designed and workshops were conducted for all primary and secondary schools for Implementation in 2002. Need identified to train teachers relating to OBA processes. CATS and EATS workshops involving 150 schools were conducted Booklets on LSMs Procurement were designed. IT curriculum support and on-line learning were introduced in schools. Training materials and support guidelines were developed and dry-runs were conducted, involving all 92 Curriculum Advisors for each of the eight learning areas; three-week programme to conclude training during the third term, involving all +/- 360 high and intermediate schools offering the curriculum. Training materials and support guidelines were developed and dry-runs were conducted, involving all 92 Curriculum Advisors to conduct Grade 4 Assessment workshops for each of the eight learning areas; two-week programme to conclude training during the second term, involving all +/- 1 400 schools offering the curriculum. Training materials and support guidelines were developed and dry-runs were conducted, involving all 92 Curriculum Advisors to conduct Grade 8 Assessment workshops for each of the eight learning areas; two-week programme to conclude training during the forth term, involving all +/- 1 400 schools offering the curriculum. Translated national CATS & EATS documents and conducted provincial training sessions for 92 Curriculum Advisors to training. Booklets were distributed to all primary schools and workshops were conducted, relating to WCED procurement practices and procedures with relevant SMTs. A half-hour reading period was introduced in all primary schools. Ongoing Web-centric training of Curriculum Planners at Head Office was completed in April and websites were designed and placed on WCED Curriculum Website. |
|
|
|
|
|
|