A SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS OF REFORM SCHOOLS AND SCHOOLS OF INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA

Undertaken by the Child Justice Project in consultation with the Department of Education to inform the planning for the implementation of the Child Justice Bill
The Child Justice Project is a UN Technical Assistance Project of the Government of South Africa

Department of Justice

Private Bag X81

Pretoria

0001

The project acknowledges research undertaken by Mr. Themba Blose for the research on which this report is based.

November 2002

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. PREFACE
  2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

2.1 Historical Context

2.2 Transformation of the Child and Youth Care System

2.3 Definitions

3. TERMS OF REFERENCE

3.1 Objective

3.2 Activities

3.3 Recommendations

4. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

    1. Quantitative findings
    2. 4.1.1 Distribution of Schools of Industry and Reform Schools

      4.1.2 Analysis of capacity in relation to access for sentenced children

      4.1.3 Provincial capacity in relation physical space needs

    3. Qualitative findings
      1. Over-arching fundamental findings
      2. Educational programmes
      3. Educational neglect
      4. Transformation issues
      5. Developmental, therapeutic and care programmes
      6. Behaviour management
      7. Re-integration work
      8. Provincial inequalities

5. RECOMMENDATIONS

1. PREFACE

The Department of Justice is leading on preparations to support the passing and implementation of a new law dealing with child offenders, the Child Justice Bill, B 49 of 2002. The Bill requires the co-operation and involvement of the departments of Justice and Constitutional Development, Social Development, SAPS, Correctional Services and Education. The Child Justice Bill was introduced into parliament in August 2002, and is expected to be debated in the near future.

Over and above a more general role that the Department of Education can play in promoting the goals of the Bill, the Department is very specifically involved with regard to sentencing of young offenders. The Bill provides that children may be sentenced to a "residential facility" and this is defined in the Bill as "a residential facility established by the Minister of Education or the Minister of Social Development which is designated to receive sentenced children.". This of course encompasses what the current law calls "Reform Schools" but leaves room for emerging models such as the Department of Education facilities in the Western Cape.

In inter-sectoral discussions about the planning for the implementation of this legislation the issue has been raised as to whether there will be sufficient facilities for children sentenced to residential facilities, and whether these facilities will be geographically available to children.

The Child Justice Project located in the Department of Justice has, with the permission and co-operation of the National and Provincial Departments of Education, undertaken this situational analysis of reform schools and schools of industry from the perspective of the criminal justice system, and has made recommendations to to how these facilities may be best utilized and improved to serve the needs of children in the criminal justice system.

2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

2.1 Historical Perspective

The Children’s Protection Act of 1913 led to the transfer of Schools of Industry and Reform Schools to the Department of Education, which took place in 1917. The National and Provincial Education Departments continue to manage these institutions till today.

One of the leading lights on education reform and former principal of the Diepkloof Reformatory, Alan Paton, captured the paradigm shift taking place during the 1940s in his 1944 address to the National Social Welfare Conference. He said, "There is a third view of punishment, that it should be reformatory. This view gained much ground in this century. If this view is held, then the word ‘punishment’ becomes inappropriate and is replaced by the word ‘treatment’. The whole purpose of the transfer of reformatories of South Africa from the Department of Prisons to the Department of Education was to change their goal from one of detention to one of education."

Another significant milestone in the South African legislative reformation was the enactment of the Children’s Act of 1960, Act 33 of 1960. This Act provided for, among other things, the appointment of probation officers and the establishment, maintenance and management of Schools of Industries and Reform Schools. This Act substantively and comprehensively increased the legal protection of children.

Prior to 1969, the majority of Reform Schools and Schools were for White children with the exception of the Coloured School of Industries in Ottery. The first Indian School of Industries was built in Newcastle in 1969. So, while the reformist developments increased the protection of White children, the same could not be said for Black children.

The passing of a string of Homeland Children’s Acts in Gazankulu, Lebowa,

Venda, KwaNdebele, Transkei, KwaZulu, Ciskei, KaNgwane, Qwaqwa and

Bophuthatswana cannot be hailed as steps forward when they did not have the

financial and human resources to implement it .

In 1983 the Child Care Act, Act 74 of 1983 was passed. This Act repealed the whole of Child Care Act No. 33 of 1960 except in so far as it relates to the appointment of probation officers and the establishment, maintenance and management of schools of industries and reform schools. The Child Care Act, Act 74 of 1983 as amended wholly repealed all the " Child Care Acts" that were legislated by the Homeland Governments.

2.2 The transformation of the Child and Youth Care system

The ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) in 1995 and the passing of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act, Act 108 of 1996 are the most two critical milestones that increased the protection of the rights of all children.

Chapter 2 ,Sections 28, 29 and 35 of the Constitution guarantees specific rights to every child, equal access to education and a fair, appropriate treatment for children and youth accused of having committed a crime.

The Transformation of the Child and Youth Care System (TCYCS) process began in 1995. It was not a deliberately planned strategy but one that emerged when responding to a national crisis caused by an unmanaged release of over 1000 children from prisons and police cells following the promulgation of Section 29 of the Correctional Services Act, Act 08 of 1959 as amended by Act 17 of 1995.

Many of the children were transferred to Places of Safety that were unprepared for such large scale admissions and this escalated pre-existing weaknesses in the residential care system at the time.

The Inter-Ministerial Committee on Young People at Risk (IMC) was set up in June 1995. The IMC comprised, among others, the following Departments involved in managing this matter: Correctional Services, Welfare and Population Development, Health, Education, Justice and SAPS. Welfare was asked to chair the committee. In April 1996 the IMC was requested by Cabinet to investigate and report on the availability and suitability of Reform Schools, Schools of Industries and Places of Safety for the accommodation of awaiting trial youth. A team was commissioned to conduct the investigation.

The investigating team recommended, among other things, that:

A National Team of experts and experienced people was appointed to manage the entire TCYCS. Five critical outputs were delivered by this team.

With all these tools and training completed, it was up to the line function officials to take this transformation process and run with it. This was done in the Western Cape Province. They now have their Policy Document and are in the process of implementation. Their view was, " the Western Cape Education Department (WCED), recognising the vital need for transformation of the education sector dealing with young people at risk, has embarked on a comprehensive process to establish an effective service for educating and reclaiming young people at risk."

Free State have also compiled a Draft Policy Document in similar vein.

    1. DEFINITIONS:

A significant number of terms, phrases and concept words used in this Report have particular meanings that are either defined by law, departmental policies, child and youth care/development practice and international conventions. They are introduced here in order to facilitate a better understanding among the readers of this Report.

"child" means any person under the age of 18 years. This definition is based on the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and the Child Care Act, Act 74 of 1983 as amended.

"youth" the National Youth Commission Act, Act 19 of 1996 broadly defines young people as all those between the ages of 14 and 35 years. There are obvious overlaps in the 14 – 18 years age definition. Persons in this age category tend to be defined differently by different practitioners or departmental policies. It is important to understand that there is a difference between a legal definition (based on an Act of law) and the language used by diverse child and youth care/development practitioners identifying target groups for specific interventions.

"learner" means any person receiving education or obliged to receive education. Chapter 2, Section 3 (1) of the South African Schools Act, Act 84 of 1996 makes it compulsory for every parent to cause every learner for whom he/she is responsible to attend a school from the first school day of the year in which such learner reaches the age of seven until the last school day of the year in which such learner reaches the age of fifteen years or the ninth grade, whichever comes first.

"school" means a public school or an independent school which enrolls learners in one or more grades between grade zero and grade twelve. (S.A. Schools Act, Act 84 of 1996 – Chapter 1)

"public school" means a school provided by the Member of the Executive Council for the education of learners out of funds appropriated for this purpose by the provincial legislature. Such schools may include the provision of hostels for the residential accommodation of learners and may either be an ordinary public school or a public school for learners with special education needs. (S.A. Schools Act, Act 84 of 1996 – Chapter 3)

"principal" means an educator appointed or acting as the head of the school.

"educator" means an educator as defined in the Educators Employment Act, 1994.

"Reform School" means a school maintained for the reception, care and training of children sent thereto in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977), or transferred thereto under the Child Care Act, Act 74 of 1983. In other words this is a residential institution where children who have been sentenced by courts of law are placed.

"School of Industries" means a school maintained for the reception, care, education and training of children sent or transferred thereto under the Child Care Act, Act 74 of 1983 as amended. Children placed in this residential institution must have been declared by a Children’s Court as being in need of care.

"institution" means a reform school, school of industries or a children’s home established under Section 29 of the Child Care Act, (Act 74 of 1983 as amended)

or a children’s home registered under Section 30 of the same Act. These are residential care facilities that cater for children who have been removed from their families or communities in terms of a specific court order. Such institutions are part of range of differentiated services known as "Level 4 Services, the Continuum of Care", described in the 1996 Policy Recommendations for the Transformation of the Child and Youth Care System in South Africa (Inter-Ministerial Committee on Youth at Risk).

"a child in need of care" Section 14 (4) (aB) of the Child Act, Act 74 of 1983 as amended defines a child in need of care as a child who "has been abandoned or is without visible means of support; displays behaviour which cannot be controlled by his or her parents or the person in whose custody he or she is; lives in circumstances likely to cause or conduce to his or her seduction, abduction or sexual exploitation; lives in or is exposed to circumstances which may seriously harm the physical, mental or social well-being of the child; is in a state of physical or mental neglect; has been physically, emotionally or sexually abused or ill-treated by his or her parents or guardian or the person in whose custody he or she is; or is maintained in contravention of Section 10" [of this Act.]

" A Commissioner of Child Welfare" or "Commissioner" means every magistrate, additional magistrate or assistant magistrate at district level. Commissioners or Assistant Commissioners are the ones empowered by the law to preside over a children’s court.

"A Children’s Court Inquiry" refers to a closed, special sitting of the Children’s Court (in a room other than that in which any other ordinary court sits) where a policeman, social worker or authorized officer can bring before a Commissioner a child who is deemed to be in need of care. The purpose of the inquiry is to determine whether the child is actually in need of care. In line with its findings, the Children’s Court will then issue a Court Order that may order that the child be returned to the custody of his or her parents/guardian or be removed a placed elsewhere, including among other options, foster care, a children’s home or a school of industries. Depending on the particular circumstances of the child, the Court can call for specific, competent people (such as social workers, parents/guardians or legal representative) to present evidence or documents that will assist the Court to arrive at decisions that are in the best interests of the child.

3. TERMS OF REFERENCE

3.1 Objective

The objective of this study was to undertake a situational analysis of the current status of Reform Schools (RS) and Schools of Industry (SOI) and to make recommendations on how facilities can be used to support the proposed child justice system.

3. 2 Activities

The study was required to Identify all facilities in the country and for each determine:

Recommendations

The terms of reference also required as consideration of rationalizing the use of all the facilities in such a way as to optimize their use and support the child justice system, taking into consideration:

  1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
    1. QUANTITATIVE FINDINGS
      1. DISTRIBUTION OF SCHOOLS OF INDUSTRY AND REFORM SCHOOLS.

Legend:

RS = Reform School B = for Boys Co = For Boys and Girls

SOI = School of Industries G = for Girls

YC = Youth Center (In the W. Cape SOI’s and RS’s are now called Youth Centers.)

PROVINCE

SCHOOLS OF INDUSTRIES

REFORM SCHOOLS

Name

Location

Sex

Name

Location

Sex

Western

Cape

De Built YC

Wellington YC

Eureka YC

**Denovo YC

George

Wellington

Rawsonville

Kraaifontein

Co

Co

B

B

Faure YC

Ottery YC

Faure

Ottery

Co

B

Mpumalanga

Vaalrivier

G. Hofmeyer

Vikelwa

Standerton

Standerton

Ogies

B

G

B

EThokomala

Ogies

B

KwaZulu-Natal

Newcastle

Mimosadale

*Bersig

Newcastle

Estcourt

Utrecht

B

G

Co

------------

 

 

Free State

Jimmy Roos

Rosenhof

Dewetsdorp

Bloemfontein

B

G

------------

 

 

Gauteng

J.W.Luckhoff

Emmasdal

Heidelberg

Heidelberg

B

B

------------

   

Eastern Cape

J.J.Serfontein

Queenstown

B

------------

 

 

North-West

Daeraad

Wolmaranstad

G

------------

   

Northern Cape

--------

   

------------

   

Limpopo

---------

   

------------

   

TOTAL NATIONAL CAPACITY:

1. Schools of Industries: 04 for Girls; 09 for Boys; 03 for Girls & Boys = Total 16

2. Reform Schools: 01 for Boys & Girls; 02 for Boys = Total 03

Total SOI and RS in RSA = 19

NOTE: * Bersig School, Utrecht in KwaZulu-Natal, catering for children of primary school-going age.

      1. ANALYSIS OF CAPACITY IN RELATION TO ACCESS FOR

SENTENCED CHILDREN

  1. Low National Capacity:
  2. The research has shown that the access of sentenced children to Reform Schools or

    equivalent institutions is very limited nationally but quite adequate in two

    provinces. Western Cape and Mpumalanga are the only two provinces that

    have sufficient institutions properly designated for the reception and care of sentenced

    children.

    Nationally there are only 4 such facilities, namely, Ethokomala Reform School

    for boys in Mpumalanga and, Faure Youth Centre (for boys and girls) and

    Ottery Youth Center (for boys only), Denovo in the Western Cape.

    NAMES OF PROVINCES

    NAMES OF INSTITUTIONS

    CURRENT MAXIMUM BED CAPACITY

     

    BOYS

    GIRLS

    TOTAL

    MPUMALANGA

    Ethokomala RS

    160

    -------

    160

    WESTERN CAPE

    Faure YC

    Eureka YC

    Denovo

    100

    120

    120

    20

    -------

    360

    TOTAL CAPACITY OF BEDS FOR SENTENCED CHILDREN

    520

     

  3. Established Need:

Seven (7) Provinces Without Reform Schools:

The data collected in this study shows that seven (7) Provinces, excluding the

Western Cape and Mpumalanga, have no institutions designated for the

reception and care of sentenced children. This is a crisis situation when

considering that some children, already sentenced to a reform school, spend

extended periods of time waiting in prison for space to open up.

The Eastern Cape Case:

The present situation in the Eastern Cape helps to demonstrate this huge

need. Currently, as many as 30 sentenced children are awaiting designation

to a reform school at North End Prison, Port Elizabeth. There are a further 6

children in similar circumstances accommodated at Enkuselweni Secure

Centre.

The standing arrangement between the Eastern Cape and Mpumalanga

Is that Ethokomala Reform School can admit up to 12 children per annum from

this province. Access to Western Cape facilities is not possible under the

existing pre-condition of a care budget that must accompany children. There

appears to be no budget in the Western Cape for children from outside that province.

It can be expected, therefore, that 18 of these children will be forced to spend the rest of 2002 in Prison and the remaining 6 at a Secure Care Center.

The Northern Cape situation:

The Northern Cape Province has resorted to referring criminal matters to children’s court inquiries so that they can be placed in their 2 Secure Care Centers, namely, The Molehe Mampe Secure Care

Centre in Kimberley and the Marcus Mbetha Sindisa Secure Care Centre in

Upington. These facilities are normally used to house children awaiting trial.

They also cannot place their children in Western Cape facilities because their

Department of Education did not budget for the care budget that must

accompany children.

A particular incident of 4 girls who killed a mentally disabled adult in

the Northern Cape in 2001 highlighted the need for a Reform School with

programmes for deeply emotionally disturbed young people. Two of the

younger girls ended up being placed at the Kimberly Secure Care Center

and the older two were sentenced to a prison terms due to lack of access to a

Reform School.

The Northern Cape Social Services and Population Development Department

approached its Provincial Cabinet in October 2001 with a recommendation

that "the establishment and cost effectiveness of a reform school

programme in the Northern Cape be urgently considered."

Children Placed In Out of Province Reform Schools:

Another way used to identify the needs was by conducting an analysis of

sentenced children from 6 Provinces who are currently placed at Thokomala

Reform School in Mpumalanga. It is certainly not in the best interest of

children to be placed far away from their families and provinces as this further

compounds the already difficult re-integration process. See the table below:

 

 

SENTENCED CHILDREN FROM OTHER PROVINCES PLACED IN MPUMALANGA – THOKOMALA REFORM SCHOOL

PROVINCE OF ORIGIN

NUMBER OF BOYS

KWAZULU-NATAL

43

EASTERN CAPE

30

GAUTENG

25

NORTH-WEST

20

LIMPOMPO (Northern Province)

10

FREE STATE

15

CURRENT ESTABLISHED IMMEDIATE NEED (Excluding Northern Cape)

143

( c) Identified Strengths:

The national study uncovered some encouraging strengths.

The Newcastle School of Industries in KwaZulu-Natal has a spare wing of dormitories that they are currently not using. Jimmy Roos in Free State, and Emmasdal in Gauteng have vast tracts of land and therefore present cost effective opportunities for building units for sentenced children that could share some of the existing resources.

4.1.3 PROVINCIAL CAPACITY IN RELATION TO PHYSICAL SPACE NEEDS

FOR CHILDREN IN NEED OF CARE AND EDUCATION

4.1.3.1 Levels of Capacity Based On Available Schools of Industry:

The Northern Cape and Limpopo Provinces have no Schools of Industry

(and no Reform Schools either). They totally depend on other provinces for the

residential care and education of their children with Children’s Court Orders

requiring them to be placed in Schools of Industries.

4.1.3.2 Low Capacity Provinces:

The North-West and Eastern Cape Provinces have one (1) single sex School of

Industry each. J.J. Serfontein in Queenstown, Eastern Cape caters for boys only

and Daeraad in Wolmaraanstad, North-West caters for girls. This means that

girls in the Eastern Cape and boys in North-West are placed away from their

home provinces.

4.1.3.3 Adequate Capacity Provinces:

KwaZulu-Natal, Free State and Gauteng have two (2) Schools of Industry each. The first two provinces have allocated their Schools of Industry in the formula of one (1) for girls and one (1) for boys. The rationale for the formula is gender equity and elimination of additional challenges caused by caring for behaviourally challenged boys and girls in one facility.

However, Gauteng have allocated both their Heidelberg-based schools to the care of boys only and thus resulting in out of province placement for girls.

4.1.3.4 Advantaged Provinces:

Western Cape:

Western Cape has, for past historical reasons, always had the greatest

concentration of child and youth care facilities. The province embarked on a

major transformation of its child and youth care system. Part of that process

resulted in the terms, "Schools of Industry" and "Reform Schools" being

expunged from their child and youth care vocabulary.

Out of the fourteen (14) inherited facilities, four (4) were shut down, three (3) re-conceptualised into Skills Schools for low achievers and a further six (6) converted into Youth Centers.

They have broken away from the national trend of single sex institutions. De Bult, Wellington and Faure Youth Centers cater for both boys and girls. Ottery, Eureka and Denovo (in the process of coming on line) are for boys only. There is a Youth Center, the only one in South Africa presently, that has the capacity to receive and care for sentenced girls in a boys and girls setting. Boys have another one dedicated to sentenced male children.

 

Mpumalanga:

This province boasts three (3) Schools of Industry. Two (2) of the Schools of Industries, namely, Vikelwa in Ogies and Vaalrivier in Standerton, receive and care for boys. The girls go to George Hofmeyer School of Industry (one of the oldest institutions) in Standerton.

        1. Capacity In Terms of Beds and Physical Space in Schools of Industry:

The majority of existing facilities surveyed appear to have adequate numbers of beds and physical space. While some of them appear to be full on paper,

the number of children physically present in the greatest number of facilities is those who have absconded. The following sample demonstrates this observation clearly:

 

 

 

SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIES

ON ROLL

PHYSICALLY PRESENT

ON LEAVE

J.W. Luckhoff - Gauteng

188

71

37

J.J. Serfontein – Eastern Cape

120

75

45

Mimmosadale – KwaZulu Natal

95

49

46

Jimmy Roos – Free State

151

111

40

Vikelwa - Mpumalanga

100

53

40

Emmasdal – Gauteng

118

68

34

Schools have their own quite unusual circumstances. For instance, over

and above 37 children on leave at J.W. Luckhoff (see above table), a further

80 children are on the abscondment list. Mimosadale found it necessary to

transfer a group of about 16 girls to a place of safety as a temporary

intervention to deal with some inter-group conflict. These children remain on

roll while they are cared for elsewhere. These are but few examples, that

indicate that if provincial authorities can work more closer with their School

Principals, more space can be freed up through administrative interventions.

Some Schools of Industry have an additional potential capacity that can

Significantly increase their current enrolment figures. For instance:

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIES

ON ROLL

POSSIBLE

MAXIMUM

POTENTIAL

ADDITIONAL

CAPACITY

J.J. Serfontein – Eastern Cape

120

216

45

Jimmy Roos – Free State

151

216

40

Vikelwa - Mpumalanga

100

250

40

Emmasdal – Gauteng

118

189

34

These institutions, and others not cited above, can realize the Potential

Additional Capacity provided it is needed, additional financial and human

resources are committed and most importantly, if it in the best interests of

children and the particular circumstances of the specific institution. Bigger is

not always best in child and youth care. So, in-depth feasibility studies would

have to be carried out before any decisions are taken.

There are institutions that are endowed with an abundance of land, such as Jimmy Roos, Emmasdal and others.

The potential for capital projects ranging from extensions to diversification of services or programmes is great.

Staff at Emmasdal have some interesting ideas on a multi-purpose child and youth care facility and staff at Jimmy Roos are considering the introduction of an Outdoor Adventure Center.

Unique Features Identified in Some Schools:

 

 

 

4.2 QUALITATIVE FINDINGS

4.2.1 Over-arching Fundamental Findings:

There is no deliberately planned match between the available educational

programmes and the profile of young people that are placed in these

institutions. This is largely because the National and Provincial Education

Departments do not, as yet, have a practitioners’ understanding of the

needs of "a child in need of care" and the sectoral context of sentenced

children. Such an understanding is mostly found in the Department of Social

Development because of the lead-partner role they played at the 1996 onset

of the Transformation of the Child and Youth Care System for South Africa

(TCYCS) led by an Inter-Ministerial Committee on Youth at Risk. (* The

Western Cape Province, is an exception to this general state of affairs, and at a policy level, the Free State.)

It appears that the matter of how best to manage behaviorally challenged children has been left to the innovation of educators and resourcefulness of schools. In many cases, the Principals and professionals in these schools have far more expertise and experience in this field than their senior managers. In such cases, District, Provincial and National Managers sometimes find themselves unable to provide clear leadership, informed support and mentorship when schools are under some distress. Furthermore, because these institutions are so few, numbering only about 20 nationally, their ability to contest for adequate priority, attention and resources always falls short.

It took the findings of the National Commission on Special

Needs Education and Training and the National Committee on Education

Support Services of 1996 for the National and Provincial Departments of

Education to gain an in-depth understanding of particular circumstances

affecting the education of child experiencing barriers to education due to

disability. White Paper 6, "Special Needs Education – Inclusive Education"

was birthed as a result of that better grasp of critical issues in this sector.

Unfortunately, Education White Paper 6 does not give a clear direction for Schools of Industry and Reform Schools except for a very broad framework. There is very little mention of Schools of Industry and Reform Schools in the entire document and in one instance a totally incorrect statement is made on the functions of such institutions; "In respect of reform schools and schools of industry, the Ministry will collaborate with the Ministry of Social Development and the provincial departments of Education to ensure that children and youth awaiting trial are provided with a supportive and effective learning and teaching environment, and that appropriate assessment practices and clear criteria and guidelines for their placement are established."

It is actually Secure Care Centers and Places of Safety run by the Department of Social Development which cater for children awaiting trial.

The classification, "school" for institutions caring for children in

need of care and those sentenced by courts was found to be problematic. The reasons and circumstances that lead to the placement of children in such institutions differ radically from the reasons and circumstances for the enrolment of children at ordinary and special schools. In the majority of cases the reason for placing children on a court order at Schools of Industry is because the child, *"displays behaviour which cannot be controlled by his parents or the person in whose custody he or she is; has been physically, emotionally or sexually abused or ill-treated by his or her parents or guardian or the person in whose custody he or she is;" It is imperative under the current law that a child to be placed must

have been declared by the Children’s Court as, "in need of care "and not just

in need of education. (* Section 14 (4) (ii),(vi) Child Care At, Act 74 of 1983 as

amended)

The United Nations Minimum Standards for Juveniles Deprived of their Liberty (JDL’s) spell out the setting, milieu, practice principles and programmes that must be present or followed in such institutions.

Not even schools with boarding facilities are expected to adhere

to such stringent procedures. The Minimum Standards clearly show that while

education is one of the key programmes for children and youth in such

facilities, a host of other therapeutic, developmental and care programmes

are obligatory. This, then sets these institutions apart from schools as

envisaged in the South African Schools Act.

4.2.2 EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMES:

Specific Educational Matters

A positive point observed in all Schools of Industries and Reform Schools in this study is that they all offer the same Outcomes Based Education (OBE) followed in mainstream education. This not only ensures a degree of standardization but also facilitates the re-integration of young people into community life on leaving the institution.

The educators also attend the same Educator Development Programme with local educators in the Districts where they are. This ensures that educators in SOI and RS are kept in touch with issues, methods and latest developments in community education, where their children come from.

It was found that across the board there are well qualified educators and some with quite outstanding academic and professional qualifications. Another very noticeable feature is that a substantial number of these educators and school managers have been in this sector of education for a very long time. There are substantially fewer young educators.

However, the unfortunate thing is that the private sector is snapping up some of the highly experienced and qualified technical instructors. For instance, a fully equipped Fitting and Turning Workshop remains closed at J.J. Serfontein because they cannot find a replacement to the teacher who left. Several workshops in other schools are either closing down or remain locked for the same reason.

There are basically four (3) Educational Streams offered in Schools of Industry and Reform Schools.

# Formal Education

# Non-Formal Education:

# Bridging Courses:

These are different innovations aimed at dealing with educational backlogs and deficits caused by educational neglect in children entering Schools of Industry and Reform Schools. At times this challenge manifests itself in the form of an older child with very low literacy skills.

4.2.3 EDUCATIONAL NEGLECT:

In all interviews held with educators in provinces, teachers cited educational

neglect in young people entering the Schools of Industries and Reform Schools

as one of the prevalent challenges they have to deal with.

Schalkwyk (The Education System) defines educational neglect as:-

" --- poor or wrong educational treatment or intervention by his educator, which

resulted in the child losing his sense of direction and purpose. He belongs to the

group of children whose formative education has gone so far wrong that a kind

of educational crisis has arisen because of educational deficits of a specific

nature, such as a lack of effective authoritative guidance, unsatisfactory

emotional relationships, little or no normative foundations, insufficient help and

support , little or no identification with a parent, and insecurity, fear and doubt,

etc." *

 

The 1996 Cabinet Investigation into Places of Safety, Reform Schools

and Schools of Industries also found that,

"3.2.1 Education: Reform Schools and Schools of Industries catering

for mainly African children were found to have a high intake of

illiterate or semi-illiterate children." #

Interestingly, the educators at J.J. Serfontein School of Industries – a school

previously catering for White children but now serving all children – indicated that

educational neglect is not only confined to African children. Interviews in our

study clearly indicate that educational neglect is prevalent in all these schools.

 

The majority of educators who participated in this study ascribed this educational

neglect to:

Responses To Educational Neglect By Schools

We found that the response to the challenge of educational neglect not only

varies from province to province but also from one institution to the other within

the same province at times. Unlike in the past when Reform Schools and

Schools of Industry were once managed by a national sub-directorate, these

institutions do not have standardized educational material or norms on

programmes/approaches to dealing with educational neglect.

Levels1 to 4 to bridge the gaps in Literacy and Numeracy.

 

      1. TRANSFORMATION ISSUES:

Although Schools of Industry and Reform Schools are now racially integrated, the legacy of the past is still reflected in the following ways:

      1. DEVELOPMENTAL, THERAPEUTIC and CARE PROGRAMMES:

Developmental and therapeutic programmes have been found to be generally inadequate. While there are a few institutions that are exemplary in this aspect, the entire system is so skewed to schooling that the critical reason why the children are placed in these facilities is not prioritized.

The main reason for placing children on a court order at Schools of Industry and Reform Schools is not just to enable them to go to school. If it were so, they would be enabled to enroll in the community-based public schools as children’s homes and foster parents do with children in their care. In the majority of cases, it is because the child, *"displays behaviour which cannot be controlled by his parents or the person in whose custody he or she is; has been physically, emotionally or sexually abused or ill-treated by his or her parents or guardian or the person in whose custody he or she is;" It is significant to note that children who, for instance, are placed in Schools of Industries have been declared by the Children’s Court as, "in need of care "and not just in need of education. (* Section 14 (4) (ii),(vi) Child Care At, Act 74 of 1983 as amended)

The lack of or inadequate numbers of professionals such as registered psychologists, registered social workers and accredited child and youth workers is the first indicator that developmental and therapeutic programmes are not at the level where they ought to be. These professionals together with registered nurses and educators make that critical multi-disciplinary team that is an absolute necessity if the child in need of care or a behaviourally troubled young person is to be helped at all.

The widespread practice of using teachers as child and youth care workers is greatly concerning. Not only are the teachers exposed to highly stressful overstretch, the children are not receiving the developmental and care services they would get from an appropriately trained Child Care Worker. A child who may

have had a bad day with a particular teacher at school, now has to endure the same relationship after school. Under normal circumstances, children get a break from the school routine and the people who manage it. They get exposed to other experiences and get time to unwind and reflect on the day’s events. This teacher-cum-child care worker practice is neither in the best interests of children nor the family/private life of educators. Forcing an educator to be on a duty that deals with behaviourally challenging children from 5h30 in the morning to 21h30 at night is not healthy at all.

4.2.6 BEHAVIOUR MANAGEMENT:

The greatest majority of educators and school managers interviewed openly

stated that they were struggling with finding positive behaviour management

techniques that can be applied effectively by all staff members in these

facilties. The abolition of the use of corporal punishment, prohibition of

behaviour management measures such as isolation cells and wholesale points

rewarding system without equipping the educators and care staff with alternative

methods has left a void that feeds perceptions of helplessness.

Institutions are dealing with this matter in best way they can. In a number of

cases the Deputy Principals, Principals and the few psychologists (where they

can be found) have been designated the roles of "disciplinarians", "fire-fighters",

and "trouble shooters". One psychologist bemoaned the fact that he was called

upon to do so much crises management that he could not find time anymore to

do his normal developmental psychology work.

 

One Reform School, which actually represents the last line of intervention in the

entire child care system, felt so out of depth in managing the behaviour of three

children that it decided to release all them for the following reasons, "His

behaviour is unbearable and there is no hope that he can be rehabilitated. He is

a danger to his inmates as well as the adults in the school." So, if the most

restrictive residential child and youth care setting, can feel and act as happened

in this true case study, it is clear that behaviour management is a serious challenge for all institutions.

4.2.7 RE-INTEGRATION WORK:

Re-integration work is at a very low level. Social workers working with the

families of children who have been place in residential care are so few and

overloaded with the result that there is a very poor communication and lack of co-

operation with institutions where children are placed. This is further exacerbated

by the cross-provincial placements.

 

4.2.8 PROVINCIAL INEQUALITIES:

Besides the obvious one of certain provinces having no facilities while some

Are enjoying an abundance, another inequality has been observed. It is:-

Budgets vary so much even in institutions with a comparable number of children, e.g.

George Hofmeyer in Mpumalanga R2,8000 000 – 00

Emmasdal in Gauteng R523, 013 – 00

 

5. RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION

5.1.1 Transformation of Reform Schools

It is recommended that all Reform Schools be de-classified as public schools and be transformed into Youth Secure Care and Education Centers with the required capacity to provide a secure, therapeutic and developmental milieu wherein young people with severe emotional, behavioural and/or psycho-social problems will be protected, educated and cared for.

It is further recommended that an Inter-Departmental Meeting of concerned National and Provincial Departments (including the Principals of the existing Reform Schools) be convened immediately. After all pertinent issues have been discussed, the meeting would then take strategic decisions on those matters that are

critical to the implementation of this recommendation such as:

    1. .2 Transformation of Schools of Industry

It is recommended that all Public Special Schools currently known as Schools of Industry be transformed into Youth Care and Education Centers without changing their school nomenclature. That they be established and maintained for the admission, care, education and training of learners sent, transferred to the school, in terms of the Child Care Act, 1983 (Act 74 of 1983) or the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act 51 of 1977) as amended.

It is further recommended that a small multi-disciplinary National Technical Support Team (NTST) be immediately appointed for 18 months under the leadership of the National Director, Special Needs Education, to:

1.The transformation of existing Schools of Industry into Youth Care

and Education Centers with the required capacity to provide Residential

Care Services in line with the Minimum Standards of Child and Youth

Care in South Africa; effective therapeutic and developmental

programmes for emotionally and/or behaviourally troubled young people

(including those in trouble with the law) and an education and training

programme whose philosophy, methodology, materials and equipment

are designed to meet the special needs of young people who are

referred to these institutions.

2.The establishment of Youth Secure Care and Education Centers provinces where they currently do not exist or are not adequately provided for such as in Limpompo (Northern Province), Northern Cape, Eastern Cape and North West.

    1. The management of qualitative and quantitative research that will inform national and provincial policy development, curriculum and educational materials design, appropriate management structures and approaches,

human resources development practices and other pertinent matters.

The design and implementation of a sector-specific Quality Assurance

Toolkit that combines the principles and practices of the Developmental

Quality Assurance (DQA) currently in use in Residential Care facilities

under the Department of Social Development and the Whole-School

Evaluation Policy.

Note: Youth Care and Education Centre means:

a public school for learners with special education needs established in terms of Section 12(2)(vi) of the Western Cape Provincial School Education Act, 1997 (Act 12 of 1997); and