|
The African elephant proposal by South Africa to the 12th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES):
Proposal by South Africa to amend the annotation attached to the Appendix II listing of the South African population of African elephant to allow the initial sale of the Kruger National Park (KNP) stockpile of ivory, 18-months after the adoption of the proposal and a subsequent annual quota of two tonnes. This proposal is for the exclusive purpose of allowing:
trade in hunting trophies for non-commercial purposes
trade in live animals for re-introduction purposes into protected areas formally proclaimed in terms of the legislation of the importing country
trade in hides and leather goods
trade in raw ivory of whole tusks of any size, and cut pieces of ivory that are both 20 cm or more in length and one kilogram or more in weight of government owned stocks originating from the Kruger National Park. An initial stockpile of 30 tonnes is proposed and a subsequent annual quota of two tonnes accumulated each year through annual mortalities and management practices
all other specimens shall be deemed to be specimens of species included in Appendix l and the trade in them shall be regulated accordingly
Introduction
The African elephant, the largest of all land mammals, is one of the symbols of the African continent and is regarded as the flagship species for wildlife conservation in Africa. Its aesthetic value arouses public emotion and attracts strong support for conservation activities. Elephants play a significant role in Africa influencing and impacting on biological diversity. They also have an economic value, traditionally as a source of ivory, and more recently, as an attraction for the growing tourism and hunting industries.
The African elephant has experienced rapid declines in some countries as a consequence of land-use conflicts between elephants and man. An increasing demand for ivory, much of which is obtained illegally, has also contributed to the decline. The African elephant population has decreased from ± 1,2 million in 1981 to approximately 770 000 in 1988 to about 620 000 in 1995. One of the causes of the rapid decline has been poaching of the animals (mainly for their ivory) in countries north of South Africa where there have been long periods of civil strife. The table below illustrates the decline in elephant numbers in some of these countries:
Country |
1981 |
1987 |
1995 |
1998 |
Angola |
12 400 |
12 400 |
8 200 |
170 |
Malawi |
4 500 |
2 400 |
2 300 |
3 800 |
Mozambique |
54 800 |
18 600 |
14 900 |
13 300 |
Zambia |
160 000 |
41 000 |
33 000 |
29 000 |
It must be noted, further, that the decline in the whole of Africa is not a recent phenomenon as the elephants in East Africa had already lost the majority of their 1925 range by 1975.
In an effort to reverse the decline, the 7th COP to CITES in 1989 passed a resolution to list all populations of the African elephant in Appendix I. The listing in Appendix I prohibited any form of commercial international trade in elephants or their products, including ivory and hides. It was thought that the Appendix I listing would halt illegal ivory trade by cutting off its source, and this in turn would reduce poaching and allow the elephant populations to increase again.
The Southern African countries, with a stable elephant population, argued that their population status did not warrant inclusion in Appendix I. Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe argued that their elephant populations were stable and, in some instances, increasing in numbers as illustrated below:
Country |
1981 |
1987 |
1999 |
2002 |
South Africa |
8 000 |
8 200 |
12 000 |
13 000 |
Botswana |
20 000 |
51 000 |
106 000 |
|
Namibia |
2 300 |
5 000 |
10 000 |
|
Zimbabwe |
49 000 |
43 000 |
70 000 |
In South Africa the elephant population is located in formally proclaimed protected areas or on private game farms. These areas are fenced and the animals are confined to the specific areas, which allow for efficient protection and effective implementation of anti-poaching programmes. This is a major difference from the situation in other parts of Africa where elephants are free-roaming and come into conflict with human settlement.
The Southern African population of the African elephant has increased from as little as 120 in 1920s to more than 13 000 in 2002 (of which 9 000 are in Kruger National Park). The population is spread throughout the country in more than 20 locations. The South African National Parks (SANP) is custodian to more than 80% of the population, but the numbers in private possession are rapidly increasing.
The listing in Appendix I in 1989 ended the trade in ivory and hides, which generated a considerable amount of revenue, particularly for the SANP. In the period 1985 to 1989 the sale of ivory generated more than R7.2 million at an annual average of approximately R1.5 million. In the same period the sale of hides earned SANP an annual income of more than R2 million. Of all wildlife products sold by the SANP in the period before 1989, elephant hides were the second largest income earner, surpassed only by ivory sales. When the African elephant was listed in Appendix I this source of revenue suddenly ended.
Law enforcement and elephant management in South Africa
CITES requirements are administered and enforced through the old provincial ordinances:
Gauteng, North-West and Northern Province: Transvaal Nature Conservation Ordinance 12 of 1983
KwaZulu-Natal: Natal Nature Conservation Ordinance 15 of 1974
Western-, Eastern- and Northern Cape: Nature and Environmental Conservation Ordinance 19 of 1974
Free State: Free State Ordinance 8 of 1969
A network of agencies and organizations enforce adherence to CITES. On a provincial level all nine nature conservation agencies have law enforcement officers, with six having established Special Investigation Units to gather intelligence and investigate the trade in CITES-listed species. In eight of the nine provinces, the old provincial ordinances provides and enables CITES enforcement. Mpumalanga province has implemented separate legislation, the Mpumalanga Nature Conservation Act 10 of 1998.
In the national parks, the National Parks Act (Act 57 of 1976) provides and enables the South African National Parks to enforce law. Furthermore, the Endangered Species Protection Unit (ESPU) of the South African Police Service (SAPS) is a specialized investigation unit mandated in terms of the South African Police Service Act 68 of 1995 to enforce CITES at national level.
Controls on poaching in South Africa are effective and since1997 there have been only five recorded incidents of elephant poaching in the Kruger National Park. Each incident involved the killing of one elephant, and over the past five years only on elephant has been illegally killed in all the other national parks. The table below indicated the occurrence of poaching incidents in Kruger National Park for the period 1980 – 2002.
According to the ESPU the cases involving illegal dealing in ivory are now rare in South Africa. The table below gives an indication of the number of ivory seizures by the ESPU for the period from 1990 – 1999:
Year |
Total no incidents |
Total no raw ivory |
Total no pieces |
Total no ivory cubes |
Total worked ivory (kg) |
Total ivory (kg) |
1990 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
44.00 |
1991 |
35 |
110 |
6 |
3 782 |
0 |
1 399.44 |
1992 |
89 |
292 |
47 |
1 304 |
0 |
3 480.00 |
1993 |
88 |
249 |
61 |
22 379 |
114 |
20 527.92 |
1994 |
66 |
93 |
47 |
2 580 |
0 |
2 856.99 |
1995 |
64 |
110 |
24 |
6 |
0 |
24 432.00 |
1996 |
69 |
95 |
30 |
297 |
11.52 |
1 104.00 |
1997 |
42 |
34 |
25 |
224 |
40.23 |
680.00 |
1998 |
19 |
53 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
295.48 |
1999 |
31 |
41 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
495.44 |
2000 |
15 |
31 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
386.67 |
2001 |
19 |
54 |
5 |
0 |
63 |
662.11 |
Total |
538 |
1168 |
271 |
30 595 |
228.75 |
56 364.05 |
The incidents above range from the confiscation of a whole tusk to the illegal possession of a piece of jewelry. Given the low incidents of poaching in South Africa, most of the ivory tusks and cubes must originate north of us in countries that have been embroiled in civil wars and where the management of conservation areas has long since collapsed.
Elephants in South African conservation areas die as a result of natural causes or management actions. Through this SANP has accumulated approximately 30 tons of ivory and more than 152 tons of hides over the past 10 years. More than 50 toms of hides were sold following the downlisting of the population at COP11. The ivory under consideration is therefore not "new" ivory and no animals would have been killed to add to the stockpile. Furthermore, no ivory from animals, which were poached or died of unknown causes, are to be traded in.
The elephant management programme by SANP is aimed at conserving the biodiversity of the area. The impact of elephants, and for that matter any animal, on the natural resources can be devastating if the numbers exceed the carrying capacity of the environment. Elephants have a considerable effect on the trees in the Kruger National Park, particularly trees with soft trunks, such as the boabab (Adansoni digitata) and the Common Star Chestnut (Sterculia rogersii). The impact of elephants on trees has further complications. For example, boabab trees are the nesting sites of the endangered Mottled Spiney Tail. Only a few nests have been found in the Kruger National Park, the only known nesting sites in South Africa. It is in this context that it is crucial for the biodiversity of our parks to be able to export elephants to other recognized conservation areas.
The elephants are mostly held in protected areas with limited carrying capacity. The increase in population in these areas has resulted in overpopulation in certain areas. To alleviate this problem a number of management options such as translocation to other less populated areas and culling have been used.
The map below shows the number and destination of the elephants translocated from the Kruger National Park from 1980 to 2002.
Translocation does, however, have its own problems due to the limited range of habitat in South Africa suitable to sustain elephants. The second option, culling, is controversial and is the subject of debate in conservation circles. There has been no culling of elephants since 1994.
Of central concern is that the conservation of biodiversity as a whole cannot be neglected to the advantage of a single species, which might reach numbers that the habitat cannot sustain. While most species adapt to changing conditions (such as drought or limited resources) by changing their reproductive patterns, the elephant changes its source of food while reproducing at the same rate thereby exacerbating any imbalances in nature.
Details of the South African Proposal to the 12th Conference of the Parties to CITES:
Sale of ivory will be restricted to ivory originating from the Kruger National Park stockpile
Trade will be limited to ivory registered in the database of the South African National Parks, which has been accrued over the past 10 years and is ongoing
No animals will be killed to supplement the existing stock
Only ivory that were obtained through legal means (which include management actions, problem animal control and natural mortality) will be eligible for trade
Ivory that has been confiscated or is of unknown origin will not be eligible for trade
Trade in raw ivory will be restricted to trade partners who can ensure strict control over the sale and the domestic handling of the tusks
The following basic conditions will apply to the sale of the raw ivory:
Sale will take place by means of an auction of the approved stock
Transport of the raw ivory will be in sealed containers
Containers will be opened in importing country under the supervision of the Secretariat and the relevant customs officials
Ivory will not be for re-export
Control measures in the importing country must be in place
Commercial international trade in live animals will be restricted to re-locating animals to conservation areas that have been established in terms of legislation in the importing country. This in effect means commercial trade within Africa and then only to protected areas.
Trade in leather goods will be allowed
Foreign hunters will still be allowed to export hunting trophies in terms of the standing relevant CITES provisions and national quota
All other items or specimen of African elephant origin will be treated as being of an animal in Appendix I and will be dealt with in term of the relevant articles of CITES. This implies that:
Commercial export of live animals will not be allowed
No commercial international trade in ivory curios will be allowed
The ivory in the Kruger National Park is under strict control and accurate records are maintained on each tusk and ivory piece accumulated. During a review visit by a Panel of Experts, appointed in terms of the provisions of CITES, it was possible to trace the origin of tusks right back to the specific locality where the animal died. All ivory is also marked in accordance with the provisions of CITES.
Income generated from the proposed sale would have been use by SANP to:
The monitoring and research necessary for the implementation of the new elephant management programme in the Kruger National Park. This programme will help to determine best practice in the management of elephant populations in protected areas and will have wide applications beyond the boundaries of South Africa (for more information see the SANP website: