PROGRESS REPORT: COURT CENTER PROJECT: JANUARY 2002
Director Crime: Dr L Glanz
Chief Director Administration of Courts: Advocate P du Rand
Special Director of Public Prosecution: Advocate J Henning
2.1 The concept was implemented at Nelspruit, Kabokweni and Pinetown Magistrates Courts
2.2 The hardware and software was stable during January 2002.
Dr L Glanz and advocate Marnus Steyn are addressing this matter
5.1 A report with regard to the monthly statistics is attached. From the statistics it is clear that the court center concept is not only enhancing the management of cases, it has also had a positive impact on the productivity at various courts.
Compiled by Deon Boardman: 21 February 2002
Magistrates Court: Middelburg (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 28/5/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time (date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
268 |
213 |
694 |
4h00 |
75 |
|
46,3% |
34,9% |
29,3% |
11,1% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
297 |
237 |
782 |
4h06 |
68 |
|
52,7% |
35,4% |
31,7% |
9,6% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
347 |
305 |
743 |
4h00 |
64 |
57 |
53,6% |
26,2% |
38,6% |
9,8% |
Comments:
Column 6-Is far below the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 10-The quality of dockets received at court seems to have deteriorated and is above the National average of 34% for January 2002
Magistrates Court: Witbank (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 6/06/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
347 |
340 |
511 |
4h24 |
55 |
|
48% |
37,8% |
43,2% |
8,8% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
290 |
279 |
590 |
4h09 |
65,1 |
|
58,9% |
38,2% |
34,3% |
9,6% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
316 |
414 |
625 |
3h50 |
50 |
54 |
66,3% |
40,3% |
32,6% |
10% |
Comments
Column 6-Is far below the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 8-Is far above the National average of 50,5%for January 2002
Column 9-Is above the National average of 37% for January 2002
Magistrates Court: Ermelo (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 4/6/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
163 |
237 |
296 |
2h22 |
60 |
|
59,6% |
29,9% |
20,4% |
11% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
174 |
192 |
252 |
2h25 |
42 |
|
60,6% |
40% |
19,9% |
11,9% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
157 |
234 |
299 |
2h40 |
35 |
40 |
67,3% |
56,1% |
12,1% |
9,8% |
Comments
Column 5-Is below the National average of 3h46 for January 2002
Column 6-Is below the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 8-Is above the National average of 50,5% for January 2002
Column9-Is far above the National average of 37% for January 2002 and should be addressed.
Magistrates Court: Odi (Garankuwa) (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 11/6/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
486 |
118 |
476 |
3h15 |
76 |
|
54,2% |
25,6% |
33,4% |
6,1% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
520 |
249 |
615 |
3h25 |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
486 |
255 |
887 |
3h55 |
51 |
27 |
37% |
25,3% |
31,7% |
8,1% |
Comments: The statistics reflected above was as on 31/10/2001.Due to the lack of human resources the concept is not been operated since the middle of October. The prosecutor however tried his best, he also made use of volunteers but could not cope, as he could not rely on the volunteers. The SAPS has also not been very cooperative. Once the human resource issue has been solved the implementation team will have to assist them with the data take on.
Magistrates Court: Bellville (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 18/6/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
689 |
821 |
1726 |
4h40 |
586 |
|
28,4% |
42,6% |
11,3% |
9,9% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
639 |
737 |
1725 |
4h09 |
629 |
|
33,4% |
37,7% |
11,9% |
12,1% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
539 |
804 |
2036 |
4h35 |
627 |
65 |
32,3% |
38,6% |
15% |
15,4% |
Comments:
Column 5-Is above the National average of 3h46 for January 2002
Column 6-Is above the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 8-Is below the National average of 50,5% for January 2002
Column 10-Is below the National average of 34% for January 2002
Magistrates Court: Bloemfontein(District Court)
Data Take on Date: 9/7/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time (date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time (date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of)
7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
1083 |
666 |
2367 |
4h00 |
462 |
|
33,2% |
37% |
29,3% |
4,4% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
1014 |
678 |
2302 |
3h58 |
455 |
|
38% |
47% |
36% |
7% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
1005 |
669 |
2748 |
3h43 |
437 |
68 |
37% |
45% |
45% |
9% |
Comments:
Column 6-Is above the National average of 143 days for January 2002.
Column 8-Is below the national average of 50,5% for January 2002
Column 9-The lack in capacity to conduct trails is above the National average of 37% for January 2002.
There is a lack of human resources to operate the concept
Magistrates Court: Port Elizabeth (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 23/7/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
920 |
802 |
4688 |
4h15 |
459 |
|
33% |
54% |
19% |
3% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
942 |
748 |
4813 |
3h52 |
336 |
|
29% |
53% |
22% |
4% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
814 |
510 |
4994 |
4H20 |
263 |
61 |
25% |
53% |
29% |
4% |
Comments:
Column 6-Is above the National average of 143 days for January 2002.There is however a great improvement since data take on.
Column 8-Is below the national average of 50,5% for January 2002
Column 9-The lack in capacity to conduct trails is above the National average of 37% for January 2002.
Magistrates Court: Empangeni (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 4/9/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
140 |
129 |
259 |
3h28 |
88 |
|
57,1% |
51% |
26,5% |
8,9% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
164 |
134 |
310 |
3h48 |
87 |
|
57,7% |
37,2% |
25,5% |
13,3% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
155 |
179 |
349 |
5h13 |
82 |
35 |
50,7% |
39,8% |
23,8% |
14,6% |
Comments:
Column 5-Is above the National average of 3h46 for January 2002
Column 8-Has deteriorated. Proactive steps should be taken to improve this situation
Column9- The lack in capacity to conduct trails seems to have been managed well. Is however above the National average of 37% for January 2002
Column10- Is below the National average of 34% for January 2002.
Magistrates Court: New Brighton (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 16/9/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
405 |
198 |
2112 |
5h10 |
201 |
|
38,7% |
47,3% |
39,7% |
4,1% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
494 |
280 |
2204 |
3H47 |
193 |
|
37% |
40% |
41% |
4% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
506 |
135 |
2396 |
2H40 |
193 |
65 |
34% |
40% |
35% |
4% |
Comments:
Column 5-Is below the National average of 3h46 for January 2002
Column 6-Is above the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 8-Is below the National average of 50,5% for January 2002
Column 9-Is above the National average of 37% for January 2002
Magistrates Court: Germiston (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 24/9/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time (date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
609 |
247 |
735 |
4h32 |
89 |
|
58,3% |
37,7% |
35,2% |
4% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
583 |
271 |
775 |
4h29 |
77 |
|
59,9% |
32% |
46,3% |
4,6% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
629 |
155 |
818 |
4h46 |
97 |
51 |
51,6% |
23% |
60,5% |
4,7% |
Comments:
Column 5-Is above the National average of 3h46 for January 2002
Column 9-Is well below the National average of 37% for January 2002
Column 10-Cooperation with SAPS/quality of dockets should be addressed. They are far above the National average of 34% for January 2002.
Magistrates Court: Kimberley (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 1/10/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
812 |
676 |
1294 |
4h30 |
69 |
|
53,8% |
57% |
25,7% |
18,8% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
700 |
652 |
1434 |
4h28 |
59 |
|
56,6% |
50,3% |
31,4% |
18,2% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
571 |
821 |
1659 |
4h29 |
65 |
43 |
53,6% |
32,1% |
52,4% |
16,2% |
Comments:
Column 5-Is above the National average of 3h46 for January 2002
Column 6-Is below the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 10-Cooperation with SAPS/quality of dockets should be addressed. They are far above the National average of 34% for January 2002.
Magistrates Court: Klerksdorp (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 29/10/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
512 |
302 |
1026 |
4h19 |
108 |
|
54,8% |
22,5% |
48,5% |
10,9% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
492 |
332 |
1051 |
4h02 |
87 |
|
52,6% |
23,8% |
43% |
11,4% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
406 |
323 |
1134 |
3h59 |
77 |
37 |
48,5 |
17,8% |
44% |
11% |
Comments:
Column 6-Is below the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 8- Proactive steps should be taken to improve this situation as they are below the National average of 50,5% for January 2002.
Column 9-Is below the National average of 37% for January 2002
Column 10-Cooperation with SAPS/quality of dockets should be addressed. They are above the National average of 34% for January 2002.
Magistrates Court: Queenstown (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 5/11/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
240 |
255 |
797 |
2h10 |
139 |
|
46,3% |
22,3% |
25,5% |
12,2% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
281 |
216 |
870 |
2H12 |
113 |
|
47% |
22% |
21% |
12% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
273 |
175 |
930 |
1H49 |
76 |
24 |
42% |
19% |
21% |
12% |
Comments:
Column 5-Is far below the National average of 3h46 for January2002
Column 6-Is below the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 8-Is below the National average of 50,5% for January 2002
Column 9-Is below the National average of 37% for January 2002
Magistrates Court: Benoni (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 19/11/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time (date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
375 |
151 |
628 |
2h53 |
66 |
|
69,7% |
33,9% |
37,2% |
14,4% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
442 |
196 |
733 |
2h54 |
55 |
|
70,2% |
31,1% |
43,3% |
14% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
498 |
248 |
884 |
3h30 |
21 |
34 |
70,1% |
28,4% |
51,7% |
14,2% |
Comments:
Column 6-Is far below the National average of 143 days for January 2002
Column 8-Is far above the National average of 50,5% for January 2002.
Column 9-Is below the National average of 37% for January 2002
Column 10- Cooperation with SAPS/quality of dockets should be addressed. They are above the National average of 34% for January 2002.
Magistrates Court: Welkom (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 26/11/2001
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
503 |
322 |
791 |
4h40 |
67 |
|
61,1% |
52,8% |
32,5% |
7,3% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
561 |
276 |
979 |
4h32 |
64 |
|
58,7% |
47,7% |
32,1% |
8,3% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
552 |
382 |
1202 |
4h26 |
61 |
33 |
53,8% |
47,9% |
36,6% |
9,3% |
Comments:
Column 5-Is above the National average 3h46 for January 2002
Column 6-Is far below the National average of 143 days for January 2002.
Column 8-Allthough still above the National average of 50,5% proactive steps should be taken to improve this situation
Column 9-Is above the National average of 37% for January 2002.
Magistrates Court: Nelspruit (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 14/1/2002
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
172 |
132 |
345 |
3h33 |
72 |
|
62% |
49,8% |
20,5% |
7,1% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
172 |
132 |
345 |
3h33 |
72 |
|
62% |
49,8% |
20,5% |
7,1% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
172 |
132 |
345 |
3h33 |
72 |
|
62% |
49,8% |
20,5% |
7,1% |
Comments: As implementation had been done during January 2002 it is not feasible to analise the statistics at this stage.
Magistrates Court: Kabokweni (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 16/1/2002
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
349 |
388 |
477 |
3h22 |
48 |
|
74,4 |
42,6% |
34,2% |
7,5% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
349 |
388 |
477 |
3h22 |
48 |
|
74,4 |
42,6% |
34,2% |
7,5% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
349 |
388 |
477 |
3h22 |
48 |
|
74,4 |
42,6% |
34,2% |
7,5% |
Comments: As implementation had been done during January 2002 it is not feasible to analise the statistics at this stage.
Magistrates Court: Pinetown (District Court)
Data Take on Date: 28/1/2002
|
Period
1 |
Number of new criminal cases registered
2 |
Number of criminal cases disposed of
3 |
Number of outstanding criminal cases on court roll at end of each month
4 |
Daily average court hours per month
5 |
Average case preparation cycle time(date of first appearance until date cases is scheduled for hearing) 6 |
Average adjudication cycle time(date case is scheduled for hearing until date case is disposed of) 7 |
Cases on court roll for less than 60 days
8 |
Cases on the court roll that are trail ready-lack of capacity to conduct trails
9 |
Cases on the court roll referred back for further investigation
10 |
Accused persons on the court roll that are younger than 18 years
11 |
|
As at data take on a |
229 |
236 |
1629 |
3h15 |
176 |
|
37% |
36,2% |
29,8% |
13% |
|
Monthly average as from data take on b |
229 |
236 |
1629 |
3h15 |
176 |
|
37% |
36,2% |
29,8% |
13% |
|
As on the end of the feedback month c |
229 |
236 |
1629 |
3h15 |
176 |
|
37% |
36,2% |
29,8% |
13% |
Comments: As implementation had been done during November it is not feasible to analise the statistics at this stage.