LEGAL AID BOARD

LEGAL AID GUIDE

2001

INDEX


The Index to the 10th edition of the Legal Aid Guide will be drafted after approval thereof by the National Assembly but before Section 2 of the Legal Aid Amendment Act, No 20 of 1996 is brought into operation.

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 DEFINITIONS

In this Guide, unless the context indicates otherwise -

1.1.1 "The Act" means the Legal Aid Act, 1969 (Act 22 of 1969) as amended (See Annexure A. 1).

1.1.2 "Benefit to the Board" means the amount accruing to the Board in terms of paragraph 5.19 and recorded in Annexure I from time to time.

1.1.3 "Board" means the Legal Aid Board established by Section 2 of the Act.

1.1.4 "Calculated income" means income calculated in terms of paragraph 2.2.

1.1.5 "CEO" means the chief executive officer (formerly called the Director) of the Board.

1.1.6 "Client" or "legal aid applicant" means the party who applies for and/or receives legal aid from the Board.

1.1.7 "The Constitution," 1996 means The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 1996 (Act 108 of 1996).

1.1.8 "Contribution" means the payment of a contribution to the Board in terms of section 3(d) of the Act, by a person to whom legal aid is rendered.

1.1.9 "Co-operation agreement" means an agreement entered into between the Board and another party, not being an individual legal practitioner or a group/firm/company of legal practitioners. This is for the purposes of rendering legal services to indigent persons.

1.1.10 "Co-operation Partner" means the party with whom the Board concludes a Co-operation Agreement.

1.1.11 "Dependent child" means an applicant's own or legally adopted child wholly and actually supported by him/her.

1.1.12 "Disbursement" means a sum of money paid by an attorney in a matter other than as fees or charges.

1.1.13 "Disposable income" means cash on hand not required for the usual daily necessities of life.

1.1.14 "Fees" or "charges" mean any or all fees of attorneys or charges of advocates. Where the amount is laid down for such an item, it shall be the fee or charge free of disbursements and Value Added Tax except where the context indicates otherwise.

1.1.15 "Guide" - means the Legal Aid Guide in force, from time to time and as amended by subsequent circulars issued by the CEO from time to time.

1.1.16 "Indigent person" means a natural person who qualifies for legal aid in terms of the means test set out in this Guide or a natural person who is unable to afford the cost of his/her own legal representation (in circumstances where substantial injustice would otherwise result) or a person other than a natural person, but not including a close corporation or a company (except a company registered in accordance with Section 21 of the Companies Act No. 61 of 1973 as amended), in circumstances where the legal personality is unable to afford the cost of its own legal representation and where the CEO considers it to be in the interests of the administration of justice that such legal personality be granted legal aid.

1.1.17 "Judicare" means the scheme set out in the Guide, as amended by subsequent circulars, by which the Board offers legal aid instructions to legal practitioners in private practice.

1.1.18 "Justice Centre" means an office or set of offices at which the Board makes available the services of public defenders and/or Principals and/or supervising attorneys and/or candidate attorneys and/or paralegals either as an office of the Board and/or in terms of a Co-operation Agreement and includes any Office of the Public Defender or Legal Aid or Legal Aid Clinic funded or partly funded by the Board and includes any satellite office of any of the above.

1.1.19 "The Legal Aid Amendment Act, 1996" means the Legal Aid Amendment Act, 1996 (Act 20 of 1996) (See Annexures A.2 and A.3).

1.1.20 "Legal aid officer" means an officer referred to in paragraphs 1.5.6 and 1.5.7.

"Legal aid centre" see Justice Centre.

1.1.22 "Legal practitioner" means a duly admitted legal practitioner who practises either as an attorney or as an advocate.

1.1.23 "Married person" is a person married as provided for under the law of South Africa. It also means a person joined in a union recognised under customary law as a marriage, and "spouse" has a corresponding meaning. It also includes a homosexual union to the extent that such are recognised in law.

1.1.24 "Principal" means a person qualified in terms of the Attorneys Act, No 53 of 1979 to act as a principal to a candidate attorney.

1.1.25 "Tax duty" or "income tax" means the amount deducted monthly from an applicant’s salary or wage in terms of the PAYE system, or as Site, or failing such deductions, one twelfth of the tax assessment for the tax year immediately preceding the date of application.

"Trial Day" means a day on which evidence is led and/or the court hears argument pursuant to the hearing of evidence and/or hands down judgement pursuant to the hearing of evidence for an aggregate time of not less than four hours.
"Substantial Injustice" means without legal representation and/or consultation:
1.1.27.1 In relation to an accused person that he/she is unable to afford the cost of his/her own legal representation and is likely if convicted to be sentenced, with or without the option of a fine, to a period of imprisonment of three months or more and if granted the option of a fine that he/she will be unable to pay the said fine within two weeks of having been sentenced.
1.1.27.2 In relation to a sentenced person that he/she is unable to afford the cost of his/her own legal representation and has been sentenced, either with or without the option of a fine, to a period of imprisonment of three months or more and if granted the option of a fine that he/she is unable to pay such within two weeks of sentence.
1.1.27.3 In relation to a detained person that he/she is unable to afford the cost of consulting with a legal practitioner and reasonably needs to do so in relation to his/her continued detention.

1.1.27.4 In relation to a child that he/she is unable to afford the cost of his/her own legal representation in civil proceedings affecting the child.

1.2 ESTABLISHMENT AND OBJECTIVES OF THE BOARD

1.2.1 The Board is an autonomous statutory body established by the Legal Aid Act, 1969 as amended.
1.2.2 The objects of the Board are to render or to make available legal aid to indigent persons as widely as possible within its financial means, to provide legal representation at State expense as contemplated in the Constitution and to provide legal services in terms of any Co-operation Agreement that may be in force between the Board and any other body from time to time.

In addition to its statutory objects set out in the proceeding paragraph the Board has identified the following strategic goals or supporting objectives:

To provide services economically, efficiently and effectively;
1.2.3.2 To create a culture of client orientation that is professional, accountable, accessible and strives towards the elimination of scarcity of resources;
1.2.3.3 To improve and sustain excellent relationships with all its stakeholders;
1.2.3.4 To align the Board with relevant national objectives, with a special focus on people;

To continually improve management systems and human resources;
To be a creative, innovative and dynamic learning organisation;
To be independent and to be seen as independent; and
To participate in the development of public interest law.
1.2.4 Every person is entitled to equality before the law. The Board therefore endeavours, within its means, to balance the scales of justice in an independent and impartial manner.

1.2.5 Owing to financial limitations, the Board is compelled to restrict the aid it provides and in certain instances must decline to offer assistance. Details of such restrictions are set out in Chapter 3 and elsewhere in the Guide. Other than these exclusions and if the funds are available, the Board will fund legal assistance to all persons complying with the means test and/or any other test prescribed in all criminal and civil matters justiciable in a South African Court. However, this is if, in respect of civil matters, the applicant’s cause has a reasonable prospect of success. In respect of criminal matters the legal aid applicant will be obliged to satisfy the CEO that there are reasonable prospects of success only in respect of bail applications, any contemplated reviews and any interlocutory application to a court other than the trial court. The Board does not provide legal aid in respect of litigation in foreign courts.

1.3 POWERS OF THE BOARD

For the attainment of its objects, the Board may inter alia -

1.3.1 obtain the services of legal practitioners and remunerate them;

1.3.2 fix conditions subject to which legal aid is rendered, including conditions in respect of the recovery of costs ceded to the Board, and conditions with regard to the payment of contributions to the legal practitioner by persons to whom legal aid is rendered;

1.3.3 stipulate benefits, which accrue to the Board from legal actions;

1.3.4 initiate and establish new procedures for rendering legal aid including but not by way of limitation, the conclusion of co-operation agreements with other bodies; and

1.3.5 do all such things and perform all such functions as may be necessary for or incidental to the attainment of its objects.

1.4 LEGAL AID SCHEME AND ADMINISTRATION THEREOF

1.4.1 The Act does not describe in what manner the Board is to attain its objects nor does it provide for regulations to be promulgated in this respect. Section 3A of the Legal Aid Amendment Act No 20 of 1996 does however provide for a Guide that should include particulars of the scheme under which legal aid is rendered or made available and the procedure for its administration. This Act will come into operation simultaneously with this 10th edition of the Guide,


1.4.2 The scheme is further administered by way of:

1.4.2.1 resolutions of the Board carried out under the supervision of the CEO of the Board; and

1.4.2.2 circulars issued by the CEO from time to time. Any circular issued by the CEO shall either be ratified by the Board in advance or shall be ratified, with or without amendments, by the Board at its next ordinary meeting, failing which it shall lapse. Any additions, amendments or deletions to the Guide effected by any circular issued by the CEO and ratified by the Board, shall be incorporated into the Guide when such is next ratified by the National Assembly as contemplated in Section 3A(2) of the Legal Aid Amendment Act, 1996, failing which such circular shall lapse.

1.4.3 The scheme was implemented throughout the Republic on 2 March 1971. During the first twenty years of its existence the Board provided legal aid by means of Judicare. During the 1990’s, starting with the Office of the Public Defender, the Board became involved in a number of pilot projects in which legal aid was provided by salaried legal practitioners employed by either the Board or a Co-operation partner of the Board in terms of a Co-operation Agreement. In 1997 the Board decided to move towards a system of salaried legal practitioners as the primary means by which legal aid would in future be provided. The Board is in the process of establishing a nationwide network of Justice Centres at which legal aid is provided by salaried legal practitioners.

1.4.4 This Guide replaces all previous Guides and circulars which shall come into operation after this guide is ratified by the National Assembly 3A(2) of the Legal Aid Amendment Act No 20 of 1996 and on the same date on which Section 3A of the Legal Aid Amendment Act No 20 of 1996 is brought into operation.

1.5 OFFICES OF THE BOARD

1.5.1 The Board's head office is situated at Building Nos. 1 & 10, Unisa Sunnyside Campus, Joubert Street (between Walker and Rissik Streets), Sunnyside, Pretoria.

1.5.2 Correspondence to the Board must be directed to The CEO of the Board, Private Bag X163, Pretoria 0001 or DOCEX 202, Pretoria.

1.5.3 The telegraphic address of the Board is "JUVAMEN", its head office general telephone number is Pretoria 481-2700, the general fax number is Pretoria 341-8747, and its general e-mail address is [email protected]. In addition, the Board has branch offices as listed in Annexure B.2 and Justice Centres as listed in Annexure B.1.

1.5.4 The Board's one and only principal place of business is at its head office at the address set out in paragraph 1.5.1 above.

1.5.5 For the purpose of any legal proceedings to be instituted by any person against the Board, the Board selects domicilium citandi et executandi at the address set out in paragraph 1.5.1. No legal process may be initiated against the Board by the service of any process at any other address.

1.5.6 At the request of the Board, the Department of Justice, save as hereinafter set out, has appointed officials of the department at each district magistrate's office in the Republic to act as representatives of the Board. (See also paragraph 4.1.1.1). An officer thus representing the Board is known as the legal aid officer.

1.5.7 Officials of the Department of Justice have not been appointed as legal aid officers in the following magisterial districts:

1.5.7.1 Where the Board has its own Justice Centre and/or Branch Office.

1.5.7.2 Wynberg (W.C.) and Goodwood Magisterial Districts are served by Cape Town and South Peninsula Justice Centres. On the East Rand and specifically the magisterial districts of Germiston, Boksburg, Brakpan, Benoni and Springs, the Board is represented by its Justice Centres at Germiston and Benoni, whose staff visit the other magisterial districts on the East Rand periodically. Atlantis is served by the Atlantis satellite office of the South Peninsula Justice Centre. Randburg is served by the Alexandra Justice Centre in Wynberg (Gauteng).

1.5.8 Where possible, the Board aims to replace the officers of the department concerned with its own officials and to open additional offices.

JUSTICE CENTRES AND CO-OPERATION
AGREEMENTS


The Board is moving towards rendering access to justice primarily by salaried legal practitioners and support staff at an increasing number of Justice Centres throughout the country. In addition to direct service delivery through its Justice Centres, the Board is exploring other means of rendering access to justice. One such scheme is that of Co-operation Agreements. The Board has entered into and will continue to enter into Co-operation Agreements with other persons and/or bodies for the rendering of legal services as, or as a part of, a joint venture with such other persons and/or bodies.

The operation of a Justice Centre in respect of which no Co-operation Agreement exists shall be governed by the provisions of this Guide, provisions of the Justice Centre Manual of the Board as amended from time to time, the decisions of the Board and directives of the CEO.

The CEO may, but shall not be obliged to, delegate some or all of the authority vested in him in terms of the Guide to any Public Defender, Principal or Supervisory Attorney. Any such delegation shall be in writing under the hand of the CEO.

The operation of a Justice Centre and/or any other services in respect of which a Co-operation Agreement has been concluded is governed by:

The Co-operation Agreement as amended or renegotiated from time to time;

The decisions of the management committee appointed in terms of such Co-operation Agreement, if any, in so far as authorised thereto by the Co-operation Agreement.

The provisions of this Guide and any previous Guides applicable from time to time, in so far as such may be applicable to the Justice Centre and/or service in terms of the Co-operation Agreement.

Any decision of the Board or directive of the CEO in so far as the Board or the CEO may be entitled to enforce such decisions or directive in terms of the Co-operation Agreement, the decisions of the management committee or the provisions of this Guide.

The Justice Centre Manual of the Board as amended from time to time.

The aforesaid Justice Centre Manual does not apply to Judicare.

In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Guide and the said Justice Centre Manual then and in that event:

In relation to any Judicare matter, the provisions of the Guide shall prevail; and

In relation to any matter to be conducted by a salaried legal practitioner employed by the Board at a Justice Centre, the provisions of the Justice Centre Manual shall prevail.

1.6.7 In the event of any conflict between the provisions of a Co-operation Agreement and the provisions of this Guide in relation to a matter to be conducted in terms of a Co-operation Agreement by a salaried legal practitioner not employed by the Board, the provisions of the Co-operation Agreement shall prevail.

1.7 GENERAL

1.7.1 The Board regards the provision of legal aid as an important element in fair litigation. It is therefore the duty of legal practitioners, at the earliest opportunity, to advise prospective clients of the availability of legal aid in appropriate circumstances. Likewise, legal practitioners should ensure that they are in possession of the latest Guide when accepting instructions. Copies of the Guide may be obtained from the Board at a charge determined by the Board from time to time. The Board reserves the right to request a legal practitioner to prove that he/she is in possession of the latest Guide, and, if not, to supply him/her with one at his/her expense.

1.7.2 Traditionally the Board has funded legal aid under the Judicare system. This means that where legal aid is granted it is done on an ad hoc basis in each individual case and payment in each matter is dealt with in terms of this Guide (see paragraph 5.11, 5.12 et seq.). Legal aid is also granted in appropriate circumstances where the client is represented by either a public defender or other salaried legal practitioner in the employ of the Board at a Justice Centre. Referrals to these legal representatives are normally but not exclusively made by the legal aid officer. Within the next three to five years the Board aims to establish a nationwide network of Justice Centres from which salaried legal practitioners will render the majority of legal aid. Judicare will eventually be restricted to specialist legal aid work for which Justice Centres do not have the capacity, overflow legal aid work, conflict of interest situations and remote rural areas in which the volume of legal aid required does not justify the expenditure involved in the establishment of a Justice Centre.

1.7.3 Any person who is admitted to practice as an attorney or as an advocate and who is employed by the Board as a public defender, principal, supervising attorney or legal administration officer of any description shall be entitled to act as a legal aid officer should the need arise. Where, in the opinion of the CEO, there is a need and the person concerned is, in the opinion of the CEO, a fit and proper person so to act, the CEO may also authorise any person over and above the legal aid officers appointed by the Department of Justice provided for in paragraph 1.5.6 above and the legal aid officers employed at the Board’s branch offices and Justice Centres to act as a legal aid officer in respect of a particular magisterial district or districts. The CEO may also withdraw the authority of any person to act as a legal aid officer for good cause. Any person whose authority to act as a legal aid officer arose as a result of such person's employment by the Board shall ipso facto lose such authority if such employment is terminated.

CHAPTER 3

LEGAL AID PRIORITIES, INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS


INTRODUCTION:

South Africa is a developing country in which there are many clamant demands on the public purse. Given the country’s limited tax base the funding of legal aid will remain limited for the foreseeable future. Given these fundamental parameters the Board recognises the need to prioritise certain areas of service delivery. The priorities that have been identified are:

(a) The express positive rights to legal aid enshrined in Sections 28(1)(h), 35(2)(c), 35(3)(g) and 35(3)(o) of the Constitution;

(b) Vulnerable groups, particularly women and children; and

(c) The landless. In this regard particular attention should be paid to the as yet unreported judgment of the Land Claims Court in the matter of Nkuzi Development Association v The Government of the Republic of South Africa and The Legal Aid Board Case Number LCC 10/01 which has important consequences, not yet fully determinable, in respect of the State’s obligation to provide legal representation in respect of civil matters in which rights in and to property and entitlements are at issue.

3.1 CRIMINAL MATTERS

3.1.1 Criminal Trials - Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996:
Having determined that an accused legal aid applicant is unable to afford the cost of his/her own legal representation, the legal aid officer must thereafter determine whether the accused would, if convicted, probably be sentenced to imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be more than three months and if granted the option of a fine whether such is likely to remain unpaid two weeks after imposition of sentence. To this purpose, the following Guidelines are laid down.

3.1.1.1 The legal aid officer shall have no further discretion in the matter if a court has granted an order declaring that an accused is entitled to legal representation at State expense either in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996 or in terms of Section 73(2)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977) or pursuant to the provisions of a report in terms of Section 3B of the Act (when implemented) or otherwise. He or she shall forthwith issue a legal aid instruction in accordance with the remaining provisions of this Guide. Instructions issued pursuant to such a court order are to be marked on the top right-hand corner of the LA 2 form "Court Order" and a copy of the relevant court order is to be annexed to the C copy of the LA 2 form forwarded to the Board's head office. The fact that the legal aid officer has no discretion in the matter and is obliged to issue a suitable legal aid instruction does not prevent the Board or the CEO, if he/she is authorised thereto by the Board either generally or in relation to any specific matter, from seeking to review or appeal against or otherwise set aside the decision of the judicial officer who issued the order, in a higher court than the court of first instance.

3.1.1.2 If the Director of Public Prosecutions/Public Prosecutor has elected to indict/charge the accused in either the High Court or the Magistrate's Court for a regional division, (hereinafter referred to as a "Regional Court"), the legal aid officer is to assume without further enquiry that the accused would, if convicted, probably receive a sentence of imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be in excess of three months and that if given the option of a fine the accused would be unable to pay such within two weeks of sentence. Any legal aid instruction issued in respect of any criminal trial in either the High Court or the Regional Court is to indicate that the matter is to be tried in either the High Court or Regional Court as the case maybe.

3.1.1.3 Where the legal aid applicant is charged before a district Magistrate's Court (hereinafter referred to as a "District Court") the legal aid officer should employ the following guidelines in determining whether the accused would, if convicted, probably receive a sentence of imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be more than three months and if given the option of a fine whether the accused would be unable to pay such within two weeks of sentence:

If the offence is one for which the legislature has provided increased penal jurisdiction in respect of District Courts the accused would, if convicted, probably receive a sentence of imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be more than three months and if given the option of a fine the accused would probably be unable to pay such fine within two weeks of sentence. Without limiting the foregoing it is recorded for the guidance of legal aid officers that the legislature has provided for increased penal jurisdiction in statutes dealing with:
Stock theft
Dealing in drugs
Unlawful possession of, or unlicensed dealing in firearms or ammunition and;
Any attempt to commit any of the above.

Despite the increased penal jurisdiction provided by statutes for District Courts legal aid will no longer be available for drunken driving, driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs and dealing in liquor without a licence from the date on which the 10th edition of this Guide comes into operation.

3.1.1.3.2 If the legal aid applicant is charged with one of the undermentioned common law offences:
Abduction
Administering poison or other noxious substances
Arson
Assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm
Bigamy
Bribery
Compounding
Culpable homicide
Defeating and/or obstructing the ends of justice
Extortion
Forgery and/or uttering
Fraud
Housebreaking
Incest
Indecent assault
Kidnapping
Malicious injury to property
Murder
Public Violence
Rape
Receiving stolen property
Robbery
Sedition
Theft by false pretences
Treason
Theft of or from a motor vehicle
Unnatural sexual offences (including bestiality); or
Any attempt to commit any of the above; the accused would, if convicted, probably receive a sentence of imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be more than three months and if given the option of a fine would probably be unable to pay such within two weeks of date of sentence.

3.1.1.3.3 If the accused is charged with a statutory offence relating to:
Administration of justice
Animal and nature conservation
Children
Corruption
Counterfeiting currency
Dealing in unwrought precious metals or uncut gemstones
Escaping from custody and/or obstructing the police
Mentally handicapped persons
Vehicle theft
Witchcraft; or
Any attempt to commit any of the above; the accused would, if convicted, probably receive a sentence of imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be more than three months and if given the option of a fine would probably be unable to pay such within two weeks of date of sentence.

3.1.1.3.4 If the legal aid applicant has been charged before a District Court with an offence or an attempt to commit an offence other than an offence set out in paragraph 3.1.1.3.1, 3.1.1.3.2 or 3.1.1.3.3 above but such offence involves an element of violence and/or dishonesty and the accused has within the immediately preceding five years previously been convicted of an offence involving violence and/or dishonesty, as the case may be, then the accused would, if convicted, probably receive a sentence of imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be more than three months and if given the option of a fine would probably be unable to pay such within two weeks of date of sentence. If in any doubt as to accused previous convictions the legal aid officer should peruse the SAP 69 in the docket held by the prosecutor.

3.1.1.4 Save as aforesaid legal aid officers should assume that legal aid applicants charged before a District Court would not, if convicted, receive a sentence of imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be more than three months and that such legal aid applicants are accordingly not entitled to legal representation at State expense in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996.

3.1.1.5 In relation to all criminal trials, including criminal appeals, legal aid officers should assume that adequate legal representation would make a reasonable difference to the prospects of the accused receiving a fair trial. The only exception to this rule is that legal aid is never available to a person who is an admitted legal practitioner. In the case of a legal personality legal aid is not available if a member, shareholder, director, trustee or beneficiary is an admitted legal practitioner.

3.1.1.6 The fees and disbursements payable to legal practitioners who attend to criminal trials and/or related matters shall be in accordance with Annexure E.3 hereto.

3.1.1.7 In the event of the CEO exercising the discretion vested in him/her in terms of Annexure E.3 to authorise increased fees/ disbursements in favour of any legal practitioner, details of the matter in respect of which such discretion was exercised, details of any increased or additional fees and/or disbursements in favour of any legal practitioner and the reasons for the exercise of such discretion shall be recorded in a report submitted by the CEO to the Board at its next ordinary meeting.

3.1.2 Criminal Appeals - Section 35(3)(o) of the Constitution.

3.1.2.1 Section 35(3) of the Constitution, 1996 provides:

"Every accused person shall have the right to a fair trial, which shall include the right –
……………..

(g) to have a legal practitioner assigned to the accused person by the State and at State expense, where substantial injustice would otherwise result, and to be informed of the right promptly.
……………….

(o) of appeal to, or review by, a higher court;
………………"

3.1.2.2 The right to an appeal is an integral part of the right to a fair trial and, where substantial injustice would otherwise result, the accused is entitled to legal representation at State expense for the purposes of an appeal. This does not however mean that every accused who is convicted is forthwith entitled to legal aid for purposes of an appeal.

3.1.2.3 The Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 1997 (Act No. 76 of 1997), inserts in the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977, Sections 309B, 309C and 309D. However, Sections 309B and 309C have been declared invalid by the Constitutional Court. The declaration of invalidity came into operation on 30 May 2001. The effect thereof is that criminal accused convicted in the Magistrate’s Courts has an automatic right of appeal to the High Court provided their appeal is brought timeously. Accused who wish to appeal against either a conviction/ sentence in the High Court or the rejection of an appeal in the High Court have still to obtain leave to appeal to either the full bench of the High Court or the Supreme Court of Appeal.

3.1.2.4 Substantial injustice will arise in respect of a contemplated appeal in a criminal matter if legal representation is not made available to the accused at State expense in circumstances where:

3.1.2.4.1 The accused is unable to afford the cost of his/her own legal representation in respect of the contemplated appeal; and

3.1.2.4.2 The accused has been sentenced to imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portions is more than three months and if given the option of a fine the fine must remain unpaid two weeks after date of sentence; and

3.1.2.4.3 The appeal has been prosecuted timeously or there is a reasonable prospect of obtaining condonation for the delay in prosecuting the appeal; and

3.1.2.4.4 In the case of an accused who wishes to prosecute an appeal against either a conviction in the High Court or the rejection of an appeal in the High Court, leave to appeal has been obtained either from the court of first instance or the Supreme Court of Appeal.

3.1.2.5 An accused must comply with all the applicable criteria set out in paragraph 3.1.2.4 above.

3.1.2.6 Whether or not the accused is unable to afford the cost of his/her own legal representation in respect of the contemplated appeal is a matter to be determined in the normal manner for the provision of legal services in terms of the Constitution, 1996 set out in Chapter 2 of the Guide. The procedure is as follows:

3.1.2.6.1 The legal aid applicant completes the means test referred to in Chapter 2 in the normal manner (See Annexure G.2). If the legal aid applicant qualifies for legal aid in terms of the means test, the legal aid applicant is indigent and is unable to afford the cost of his/her own legal representation. Consequently, if the legal aid applicant qualifies in terms of the means test, the enquiry in respect of the legal aid applicant's ability to pay for the cost of his/her own legal representation need proceed no further.

3.1.2.6.2 If the legal aid applicant does not qualify for legal aid in terms of the means test calculation set out in Annexure G.2, then Annexure G.3 is to be completed and forwarded to the CEO who will consider whether or not the legal aid applicant qualifies for the assignment of legal representation at State expense. He or she will take into account the income, expenditure, assets and liabilities of the legal aid applicant, the nature and number of the charges involved, the number of co-accused involved, the forum in which the proceedings are to take place, the anticipated duration of such proceedings and any factors relating to the complexity of the matter and the personal circumstances of the accused which may be drawn to the attention of the CEO.

3.1.2.7 In relation to criminal appeals, it is not necessary for the legal aid officer to determine in advance of the appeal whether or not the accused faces the prospect of imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion would be more than three months and if the accused was given the option of a fine, whether such fine has remained unpaid for two weeks after sentence. In relation to criminal appeals it is merely necessary to determine factually whether or not the accused has been sentenced to imprisonment, either with or without the option of a fine, of which the unsuspended portion is more than three months and, if the accused was given the option of a fine, whether such fine has remained unpaid for two weeks after sentence.

3.1.2.8 In relation to an appeal from the magistrates’ courts to the High Court, a legal aid applicant who has not prosecuted his/her right of appeal timeously and who will need to obtain condonation will be deemed to have a reasonable prospect of obtaining condonation if legal aid is applied for within six months of date of sentence. Conversely a legal aid applicant who applies for legal aid for an appeal from the magistrates’ courts to the High Court more than six months after sentence will be deemed by the legal aid officer not to have a reasonable prospect of obtaining condonation. Legal aid applicants whose application for legal aid is refused on this basis must, as usual, be advised by the legal aid officer of their right to appeal to the CEO against the decision of the legal aid officer. The six months rule introduced in this paragraph is an exception to the general rule that the CEO decides on the legal aid funding of applications for condonation after consideration of a report on the merits. This exception has been introduced to cope with the volumes anticipated in the wake of the declaration of invalidity by the Constitutional Court of Sections 309B and 309C of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977. In the High Court the position is as follows:

3.1.2.8.1 A legal aid applicant who has been granted leave to appeal by the court a quo will be deemed to have a reasonable prospect of success before the immediately superior forum.

3.1.2.8.2 A legal aid applicant who has been granted leave to appeal by the Supreme Court of Appeal will be deemed to have a reasonable prospect of success before the court, which is to hear the appeal.

3.1.2.8.3 Any legal aid applicant who has either been refused leave to appeal by the court a quo or who has been refused leave to appeal by the petition process or who has had an appeal from the magistrates’ court refused by the High Court will be deemed not to have a reasonable prospect of success and not to be entitled to legal representation at State expense in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution. The CEO will however have discretion to authorise a further petition to the Supreme Court of Appeal in respect of the last mentioned category of cases. In such instances the CEO, in addition to any other relevant factors brought to his/her attention, may take into account such factors as the funds then available to the Board and its budget.

3.1.2.9 In the High Court the legal aid mandate of a legal practitioner who was instructed on a legal aid basis in respect of the defence of the accused in the court a quo will extend to include the bringing of an application for leave to appeal on a legal aid basis provided such application for leave to appeal is brought within the time periods prescribed by Section 316 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977. In the magistrates’ courts the legal aid mandate of a legal practitioner who was instructed on a legal aid basis in respect of the defence of the accused in the court a quo will extend is include the filing of notice in terms of Rule 67(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Rules. A Judicare legal practitioner giving notice in terms of Rule 67(1) shall give the postal address of the accused as the address for service.

3.1.2.9.1 Where any application for leave to appeal from a High Court judgement needs to be accompanied by an application for condonation, the legal aid applicant will not only have to apply for legal aid anew but also the CEO will have to be satisfied by the legal aid applicant or his legal representative that the contemplated application for condonation has a reasonable prospect of success.

3.1.2.9.2 Legal practitioners are reminded of their continuing obligation in terms of paragraph 5.11 of the Guide to ensure that their legal aid clients continue to qualify for legal aid and of their obligation to draw any change in the circumstances of the legal aid applicant to the attention of the CEO.

3.1.2.9.3 Whenever possible an application for leave to appeal must be brought on the same day sentence is handed down. Where it is not possible, for whatever reasons, a detailed written explanation as to why it was not possible to bring the application for leave to appeal on the same day on which sentence was handed down must accompany the account of the legal practitioner.

3.1.2.9.4 If the reason for not bringing an application for leave to appeal or for not filing a notice in terms of Magistrates’ Court Rule 67(1) is that the accused instructed the legal practitioner not to bring such an application then the instructions of the accused are to be recorded in writing under the signature/mark of the accused. Said instructions are to accompany the legal practitioner's final account in the matter. The Board will not consider the account concerned for payment until the Board receives the accuser’s instructions.

3.1.2.10 In the High Court the legal aid mandate of a legal practitioner who was instructed in respect of the trial in the court a quo will in future extend to the launching of a petition on a legal aid basis provided such petition is delivered within the time period specified in Section 316 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 and further provided that no legal practitioner shall launch any petition on behalf of any legal aid applicant unless such petition has a reasonable prospect of success. Any judge of appeal who refuses a petition and who is of the view that such petition never had a reasonable prospect of success and ought not to have been launched may bring such view to the attention of the CEO in writing within 14 days of the refusal of the said petition. In the event of a judge of appeal communication to the CEO that a petition launched on a legal aid basis never had a reasonable prospect of success the Board shall be entitled to and may refuse payment to the legal practitioner concerned of any fee or disbursements relating to the petition in question or reasonably incidental thereto.

3.1.2.10.1 Where no petition is brought timeously and where an application for condonation becomes necessary a fresh application for legal aid by the legal aid applicant will be necessary and it will be necessary for the CEO to be satisfied by the legal aid applicant or his legal representative that the contemplated application for condonation has a reasonable prospect of success.

3.1.2.10.2 Where an appeal against a judgement or order of the lower court has been refused by the High Court no further petition to the Supreme Court of Appeal may be launched on a legal aid basis without the CEO first having been satisfied that the contemplated petition to the Supreme Court of Appeal has a reasonable prospect of success. In such an instance, it will be necessary for the legal aid applicant to make a fresh application for legal aid.

3.1.2.10.3 An application to be permitted to lead further new evidence is not to be brought on a legal aid basis unless the CEO has first been satisfied that the application to lead further evidence has a reasonable prospect of success save in those instances where such application to adduce further evidence is brought simultaneously with a petition at no additional cost to the Board.

3.1.2.10.4 A legal practitioner who is entitled to bring an application for leave to appeal or to launch a petition shall be entitled to apply on behalf of the accused for bail pending the determination of the contemplated appeal provided the accused was not de facto in detention prior to his/her conviction and further provided that no appeal against any refusal of bail pending an appeal may be conducted on a legal aid basis without the CEO’s consent.

3.1.2.11 Where any application for condonation is necessary, or when an application to lead further evidence is contemplated, or where the court a quo was a Magistrate's Court and a petition to the Chief Justice is contemplated, or where an appeal against the refusal of bail pending an appeal is contemplated, it will be necessary for the CEO to be satisfied in advance that the contemplated step has a reasonable prospect of success.

3.1.2.11.1 Where it is necessary in respect of a criminal appeal or any ancillary step to satisfy the CEO that any such step has a reasonable prospect of success, a written report must be submitted to the CEO by the legal practitioner instructed by the Board setting out:

3.1.2.11.1.1 the full names of all the contemplated appellants;

3.1.2.11.1.2 a proper description of the court a quo, the case number and the date or dates of conviction and sentence;

3.1.2.11.1.3 the charge or charges in respect of which the legal aid applicant contemplates an appeal and the sentence imposed in respect of each such charge;

3.1.2.11.1.4 the nature of any evidence wrongly admitted at the trial and the reasons, with authority, for submitting that such was wrongly admitted;

3.1.2.11.1.5 the nature of any misdirection on any point of law by the presiding judicial officer and the reasons, with authority, for submitting that such misdirection took place;

3.1.2.11.1.6 the nature of any erroneous deductions and/or conclusions reached by the judicial officer and the reasons, where appropriate with authority, for believing that such deductions/ conclusions are erroneous;

3.1.2.11.1.7 any appropriate submission, with authority, as to why the sentence or any portion thereof was strikingly inappropriate;

3.1.2.11.1.8 whether it will be necessary for the accused to launch an application for condonation and, if so, the precise nature of the condonation required including the extent of the delay to be condoned and the reasons, supported by authority, for believing that such condonation will be granted;

3.1.2.11.1.9 if any petition to the Chief Justice is contemplated where conviction and sentence originally took place in the Magistrates’ Court, detailed submissions will be required, with authority, as to why the Judges of the Provincial/Local Division concerned erred in rejecting the appeal;

3.1.2.11.1.10 if any application to lead further evidence is contemplated the precise nature of such evidence must be set out together with a detailed explanation as to why such was not available and was not placed before the court at the time of the trial together with any submissions, with authority, as to why such application is likely to be granted;

3.1.2.11.1.11 the prospects of success with reasons for such submissions, in respect of a contemplated appeal against a refusal of bail pending an appeal;

3.1.2.11.1.12 the costs of the contemplated proceedings in terms of the current Board tariff and how such are calculated.

3.1.2.11.2 In the Magistrates’ Court when an accused applies for legal aid within six months of sentence in respect of a contemplated appeal but requires condonation because no notice in terms of Rule 67(1) has been filed timeously or the appeal has not been prosecuted timeously, then the legal aid officer shall determine whether the accused qualifies for legal aid in terms of the directives set out in paragraph 3.1.2.4 above and the legal aid officer shall thereafter issue an instruction to a legal practitioner to read as follows:

"1. To consult with the accused in terms of Section 35(2)(c) of the Constitution.

2. To obtain a copy of the record in terms of Rule 66(9).

3. To proceed with the contemplated appeal and any requisite application for condonation."

Where an application for condonation is not required the last phrase in paragraph 3 of the above pro forma instruction may be omitted.

3.1.2.11.3 In the High Court where an accused who qualifies for legal aid in terms of paragraph 3.1.2.4 above applies for legal aid in respect of an appeal within the time limit prescribed for the bringing of an application or leave to appeal, or if leave to appeal has already been refused, within the time limit prescribed for the bringing of a petition, the legal aid officer shall issue a legal aid instruction to a legal practitioner which shall read as follows:

"1. To assist the legal aid applicant with an application for leave to appeal and/or a petition against conviction and/or sentence under case number………………..…handed down by the…..……………...............Court at……….…………….on ……………………………………………………

2. To obtain a copy of the record in terms of Rule 49A of the Uniform Rules/Rule 52 of the Uniform Rules.

3. To report in due course to the CEO of the Board on the outcome of the application for leave to appeal and/or petition."

3.1.2.11.4 In other instances where an application for legal aid/a new application for legal aid needs to be made prior to the finalisation of the application for leave to appeal/petition procedure, the legal aid officer should ascertain whether the legal aid applicant qualifies for legal aid as set out in paragraph 3.1.2.4 above and if so satisfied, the legal aid officer should issue a legal aid instruction in favour of a legal practitioner to read as follows:

"1. To consult with the accused in terms of Section 35(2)(c) of the Constitution.

2. To obtain a copy of the record in terms of Rule 66(9) of the Magistrate's Court Rules/Rule 49A of the Uniform Rules/Rule 52 of the Uniform Rules.

3. To report to the CEO of the Board on the merits of the contemplated application for condonation application to lead further evidence/petition to the Chief Justice (in respect of an accused convicted and sentenced in a Magistrate's Court)/appeal against the refusal of bail pending appeal, on the merits of the contemplated appeal/petition/ application and to obtain his response before proceeding therewith."

3.1.2.11.5 Where in any instance a legal practitioner is required to submit a report to the CEO of the Board on the merits of the matter the legal practitioner may, pending the reply by the CEO, take all such steps on a legal aid basis as are necessary to prevent:

3.1.2.11.5.1 the accused having to apply for condonation provided no application for condonation was already necessary when the merit report was submitted to the CEO;

3.1.2.11.5.2 the appeal being struck off the roll provided the report was submitted to the CEO at least twelve weeks before the date appointed for the hearing of the appeal.

3.1.2.11.6 After any application for leave to appeal and petition is disposed of, either favourably or otherwise, or in the Magistrates Courts (from 31st May 2001) after the trial is completed and any necessary notice in terms of Magistrates’ Court Rule 67(1) has been filed, the mandate of the legal practitioner instructed on a legal aid basis in respect thereof will ipso facto terminate. The legal aid applicant/accused may thereafter reapply for legal aid in respect of the proceedings before the court which is to hear the appeal. The basis on which the legal aid officer will decide whether or not the legal aid applicant is to receive legal aid in respect of the actual appeal are the same as those set out previously. However, the legal practitioner instructed in respect of such appeal will be a legal practitioner practising within the Magisterial District where the seat of the court, which is to hear the appeal, is situates and whose name appears on the rotation list in respect of criminal matters in the High Court. If the legal practitioner who represented the legal aid applicant in the court a quo appears on the relevant rotation list in respect of criminal matters in the High Court and if such is drawn to the attention of the legal aid officer, the legal aid officer shall instruct such legal practitioner in respect of the appeal unless the CEO directs otherwise. Save with the leave of the CEO, only one legal practitioner shall be instructed on a legal aid basis in respect of a criminal appeal. The accused shall be entitled to apply for legal aid in respect of an appeal to either the legal aid officer at the seat of the court a quo or the legal aid officer at the seat of the court which is to hear the appeal or the legal aid officer in respect of the magisterial district within which the accused is detained. If the legal aid application is received by the legal aid officer at the seat of the court a quo or by the legal aid officer in respect of the magisterial district where the accused is detained, then the legal aid officer who receives the legal aid application will forward such, together with the completed means test calculation and the decision, if any, of the CEO on Annexure G.3 to the legal aid officer at the seat of the court which is to hear the appeal. The legal aid officer at the seat of the court, which is to hear the appeal, will consider the application and, if successful, assign a legal practitioner to the matter in accordance with the rules set out elsewhere in this Guide. In the event of the Board not having an office at the seat of the court which is to hear the appeal the CEO may elect to instruct the legal aid officers in respect of the magisterial districts falling within the area of jurisdiction of the Division of the High Court concerned to forward applications for legal aid in respect of criminal appeals to a legal aid officer at another office of the Board.

3.1.2.12 The fees and disbursements payable to legal practitioners who undertake criminal appeals and/or related matters incidental thereto shall be in accordance with Annexure E.2 hereto.

3.1.2.13 In the event of the CEO exercising his/her discretion vested in him/her in terms of paragraph 2 of Annexure E.2 in favour of any legal practitioner, details of the matter in respect of which such discretion was exercised, details of any increased or additional fees and/or disbursements authorised and the reasons for the exercise of such discretion shall be recorded in a report submitted by the CEO to the Board at its next ordinary meeting.

3.1.3 Legal Advice to Detainees - Section 35(2)(c) of the Constitution, 1996.

3.1.3.1 The Board contemplates a multi-lingual 24 hours a day, seven days a week phone-in service for the provision of legal advice to detainees as envisaged in Section 35(2)(c) of the Constitution, 1996. This service will be known as the "Redline". Personnel, including legal practitioners, in the service of the Board will staff the Redline.

3.1.4 Abolition of legal representation in criminal matters other than in terms of the Constitution, 1996.

3.1.4.1 Accused who do not qualify for legal representation at State expense in terms of the Constitution, 1996, shall not be represented on a Judicare basis.

3.1.5 Withdrawal and Refusal of Legal Aid.

3.1.5.1 Legal aid shall cease if the accused client fails to appear timeously in court on the appointed day without reasonable excuse. In such circumstances the legal practitioner must cease acting for the accused and render his account to the Board up to that date.

3.1.5.2 An accused shall not be entitled, as of right, to the provision of a second or subsequent legal practitioner on a legal aid basis if the accused has dismissed the first legal practitioner or has caused the first legal practitioner to withdraw by lack of co-operation or otherwise, unless the accused can satisfy the CEO that the first legal practitioner was dismissed or obligated to withdraw for good cause.

3.1.5.3 If legal aid in respect of any criminal matter is refused, the legal aid officer shall have the legal aid applicant complete, in duplicate, Annexure L hereto. The legal aid officer shall forward one copy of Annexure L to the CEO, while the other shall be given to the legal aid applicant.

3.1.6 Legal Aid for Persons Sentenced to Death.

3.1.6.1 Section 1 (1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997 (Act 105 of 1997) provides that:

"The Minister of Justice shall, as soon as practicable after the commencement of this Act, refer the case of every person who has been sentenced to death and has in respect of that sentence exhausted all the recognised procedures pertaining to appeal or review, or no longer has such procedures at his or her disposal, to the court in which the sentence of death was imposed. "

3.1.6.2 Section 1(3) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997 provides that:

"(a) The court shall be furnished with written argument on behalf of the person sentenced to death and the prosecuting authority.

(b) The court -

(i) shall consider the written arguments and the evidence lead at the trial; and

(ii) may, if necessary, hear oral argument on such written arguments, and shall advise the President, with full reasons therefore, of the need to set aside the sentence of death, of the appropriate sentence to be substituted in its place and, if applicable, of the date to which the sentence shall be antedated."

3.1.6.3 The CEO shall designate, in writing, a legal administration officer at the head office of the Board who will have the following tasks:

3.1.6.3.1 Ascertain from the Department of Correctional Services who of the persons currently in prison and sentenced to death fall into the category described in Section 1 (1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997;

3.1.6.3.2 Ascertain from the Department of Correctional Services the date on which such person was sentenced to death, the Division of the High Court, which imposed the sentence, the case, number under which the death sentence was imposed and the current place of detention;

3.1.6.3.3 Liase with the Ministry of Justice periodically to ascertain which cases in which the sentence of death was imposed, the Minister of Justice, acting in terms of Section 11(1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997, has referred to the court;

3.1.6.3.4 Liase with the Judge Presidents of the divisions concerned to ascertain the names of the judges who are to deal with the various matters and the date, in each instance, by which written argument must be filed; and

3.1.6.3.5 Instruct a legal aid officer in the magisterial district where the prisoner is currently detained to call upon such a prisoner to invite him/her to apply for legal representation in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996 and to ascertain whether the prisoner qualifies for legal representation at State expense. The legal aid officer will advise the prisoner and the designated legal administration officer immediately in writing of the outcome of the legal aid application. The designated legal administration officer will advise the Judge President concerned in writing if the prisoner does not qualify for legal representation at State expense or does not wish to be represented. The CEO enjoys a discretion to authorise the granting of legal aid in death sentence matters even if the accused could afford the cost of his/her own legal representation.

3.1.6.4 If the prisoner does qualify for legal assistance at State expense, the legal aid officer will instruct a legal practitioner to assist the prisoner, selecting such legal practitioner in accordance with Annexure O. Such instructions should read as follows:

1. To obtain from the Ministry of Justice and peruse a copy of the court record in the matter in which the legal aid applicant was sentenced to death by Judge ………………. of the ............. Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa under Case No ………………………..on the …………….. day of……………

2. To consult with the legal aid applicant at ……………… prison.

3. To prepare and submit a written argument as required by Section 1(3)(a) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997.

4. To peruse the written arguments submitted by the prosecuting authority in terms of Section 1(3)(a) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997.

5. To report to ……………. the designated legal administration officer at the Board's head office, in the event of the court requiring oral argument as envisaged in Section 1(3)(b) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997, with a view to the extension of the mandate herein set out to include appearing before the court in question to submit such oral argument "

3.1.6.5 If requested to do so in writing by the court, but not otherwise, the designated legal administration officer shall be entitled to extend the mandate of any legal practitioner instructed by a legal aid officer - e.g. to appear before the court to submit oral argument.

3.1.6.6 The Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997 does not make provision for the hearing of any new evidence or the submission of any reports by witnesses and/or experts and Section 1(5) specifically excludes any appeal in respect of the proceedings, finding or advice of the court.

Annexure E4 hereto details the fees allowable to legal practitioners in respect of legal services rendered pursuant to the provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997.


3.1.6.7.1 In the event of the CEO exercising the discretion vested in him/her in terms of paragraph 2 of Annexure E.4 or in terms of paragraph 3.1.6.3.5 above in favour of any person sentenced to death and/or in favour of any legal practitioner, details of the matter in respect of which such discretion was exercised, the extent to which any legal aid recipient exceeded the prescribed means test, details of any increased or additional fees and/or disbursements authorised and the reasons for the exercise of such discretion shall be recorded in a report submitted by the CEO to the Board at its next ordinary meeting.

Co-accused:

3.1.7.1 Wherever possible the legal aid officer should appoint one legal practitioner to represent all the accused in any one criminal trial/appeal.

3.1.7.2 However, where advised by the Director of Public Prosecutions/Public Prosecutor, Court, accused or any legal practitioner that there are reasonable grounds for anticipating an actual or potential conflict of interest between two or more of the accused, then and in that event, the legal aid officer shall appoint as many legal practitioners to represent the various accused as are required to overcome the conflict(s) of interest.

3.1.7.3 Where more than one accused are represented by a single legal practitioner the name and details of the first accused represented by the legal practitioner instructed shall be recorded on the LA 2 instruction and the names and details of the co-accused represented by the same practitioner are to be recorded in an annexure to the instruction. On no account must any legal aid officer issue separate legal aid instructions for co-accused represented by the same legal practitioner.

3.1.7.4 Where it is necessary for a legal aid officer to issue more than one legal aid instruction in respect of any criminal trial/appeal. The legal aid officer must:

3.1.7.4.1 Record the reasons for issuing a second or subsequent legal aid instruction on the LA 2C;

3.1.7.4.2 Cross-reference the second or subsequent legal aid instruction to the first legal aid instruction in respect of that criminal trial/appeal.

3.2 REPORTS TO COURTS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS ORDERED
BY COURTS


3.2.1 In terms of Section 3B(1) of the Act, as it is to be amended by the Legal Aid Amendment Act 1996, a court is obliged, before directing that a person is entitled to legal representation at State expense, to "refer the matter for evaluation and report by the Board". Immediately, upon the implementation of this Section (which is anticipated simultaneous with the coming into operation of this Guide), legal aid officers in each and every magisterial district are required to liase with the Chief Magistrate of the district and the Clerk of the Judge President of any High Court, which has its permanent seat within the magisterial district. The purpose of such liaison is to request the said judicial officers to arrange for the implementation of the provisions of Section 3B(1)(b) of the Act in two stages namely:

3.2.1.1 A court should first advise an accused of his or her right to legal representation as envisaged in Section 2A of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 as amended by Act No. 86 of 1996 and afford the accused a reasonable opportunity to obtain legal assistance as envisaged by Section 213 of the same Act.

3.2.1.2 Only if the accused subsequently reports to the court at a later date that he or she applied for legal aid but that such was refused, should a court contemplate referring the matter to the Board for evaluation and report as envisaged in Section 3B(1)(b) of the Act as amended by the Legal Aid Amendment Act, 1996.

3.2.2 The purpose of the proposed two-stage approach set out in paragraph 3.2.1 above is to avoid a potential situation where the Board is required to submit many thousands of reports to courts in matters in which there was never any doubt that the accused was entitled to legal representation at State expense in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996. The Board has limited resources, funds and a severely limited personnel complement. Unless absolutely necessary therefore, judicial officers should be requested by their Judge Presidents or Chief Magistrates, as the case may be, to avoid calling upon the Board to evaluate and report upon matters unless and until legal aid is refused. As legal aid is in practice granted to the vast majority of criminal accused who apply, it is hoped that the two stage approach envisaged above will reduce the number of reports, which legal aid officers are obliged to draft, to manageable proportions.

3.2.2.1 If a legal aid officer is requested by a court to evaluate and report on whether an accused is entitled to legal representation at State expense the legal aid officer must first consider the application in terms of the provisions of this Guide, if such has not already been considered, and thereafter compile a report in triplicate in the format set out in Annexure M hereto. The original of the report shall be forwarded to the Clerk or Registrar of the court as the case may be, one copy shall be forwarded to the CEO and the remaining copy shall be retained by the legal aid officer together with a copy of the court order requiring such report and the LA-1, (legal aid application).

3.2.2.2 In terms of Section 73(2C) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 as amended by Act No. 86 of 1996, a court may order that the costs or portion of the costs of legal representation provided at State expense be recovered from the accused. In the event of any such order a legal aid officer must attach a copy of the Court order not only to the C copy of the LA 2 form but also to the A and B copies thereof so as to ensure that such is brought to the attention of the legal practitioner concerned on the receipt of the original instruction. Unless otherwise specifically provided for in the relevant court order the Board will expect the legal practitioner to collect the contribution or contributions ordered by the court from the accused before submitting his final account to the Board. The Board will accordingly deduct the amount of contribution or the aggregate of the contributions ordered from the amount due to the legal practitioner. In matters in which the legal practitioner instructed is in the employ of the Board, said legal practitioner shall, save as otherwise provided for by the court order, recover the contribution of the legal aid applicant before plea. The amount recovered shall immediately be deposited directly to the Board's current bank account and the relevant deposit slip shall be forwarded to the CEO.

3.3 CIVIL MATTERS

3.3.1 No Judicare legal aid shall be rendered for the following:

3.3.1.1 In proceedings in terms of Sections 65, 72 and 74 of the Magistrate's Courts Act, 1944 (Act No. 32 of 1944). This exclusion also includes proceedings in terms of these sections, which originate from proceedings where legal aid has already been granted to a litigant. The CEO however, may consent to proceedings in terms of these sections to recover costs on behalf of the Board.

3.3.1.2 For the administration, voluntary surrender or sequestration of an estate or the liquidation of a legal person.

3.3.1.3 In an action for damages on the grounds of defamation, reach of an engagement contract, infringement of dignity, infringement of privacy, seduction, adultery or inducing someone to desert or stay away from his/her spouse.

3.3.1.4 For any action which the applicant may institute in a small claims court established by Section 2 of the Small Claims Courts Act, 1984 (Act 61 of 1984). In addition, legal aid is not available for the prosecution of a claim not exceeding the quantitative jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court by more than 25%. The reason is that the likely costs of the matter rarely justify legal action and the matter can easily be brought within the jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court by means of abandonment of part of the claim.

3.3.1.5 In any civil appeal in which the CEO has not been satisfied that there are reasonable prospects of success and (where applicable) recovery.

3.3.1.6 Arbitration, mediation, conciliation or any other forms of alternative dispute resolution, save that:

3.3.1.6.1 The CEO has a discretion to authorise the rendering of such services on a legal aid basis in any particular matter when in his/her view the rendering of such services is likely to lead either to the expeditious resolution of the matter and the saving of costs or the pursuit or further pursuit of the matter concerned on an adversarial basis is likely to cause serious and irremediable harm to the legal aid applicant or any immediate dependant of the legal aid applicant;

3.3.1.6.2 The Board may in its discretion decide to permit the rendering of arbitration, mediation, conciliation or any other form of alternative dispute resolution services on a legal aid basis either in general or in respect of particular classes of matters. In the event of the Board making such decision it shall simultaneously prescribe a tariff in respect of which such services are to be rendered, unless the Board elects to limit the rendering of such services to legal practitioners in the employ of the Board.

3.3.1.6.3 Justice Centres will provide alternative dispute resolution services where the rendering of such services is likely to lead to either the expeditious resolution of the matter and the saving of costs.

3.3.1.7 In matters where, in the opinion of the CEO, there is no substantial and identifiable material benefit to the client. Without limiting the generality of the a foregoing the Board does not provide legal aid in respect of disputes about who is to bury a deceased or where the deceased it to be buried.

3.3.1.8 For the prosecution, on a Judicare basis, of a claim sounding in money or the continuation of such a matter. Where legal aid is refused on this ground, the legal aid officer must advise the legal aid applicant of the possibility of entering into an arrangement with a legal practitioner for the conduct of such a matter on a contingency basis. The prohibition set out in this paragraph only applies to matters in which the primary prayer of the plaintiff/applicant sounds in money. Thus, for instance, a Judicare instruction may be issued for a divorce action in which maintenance is also claimed or a Land Restitution Claim in which monetary compensation is claimed in the alternative.

3.3.1.9 For the institution, on a Judicare basis, of any family law matter in the High Court. Wherever possible Justice Centres will assist legal aid recipients with family law matters. (See in this regard paragraph 3.6.1.4 below).

3.3.1.10 In matters excluded by the Board from time to time.

3.3.1.11 In matters where the CEO is of the opinion that the chances of successful enforcement of an order in favour of the applicant are slim.

3.3.1.12 In enquiries in the Children's Court on a Judicare basis without the prior approval of the CEO save that the Board shall be entitled to conclude a co-operation agreement for the provision of such services by the Board pursuant to the provisions of Section 28(1)(h) of the Constitution, 1996. Wherever possible Justice Centres will assist with Children’s Court matters.

3.3.1.13 In domestic violence matters on a Judicare basis where a salaried legal practitioner from a Justice Centre is available to attend to the matter. In circumstances in which the nearest Justice Centre would normally assist in a domestic violence matter, but is unable to do so either as a result of lack of capacity or because the distance between the said Justice Centre and the magistrate’s court at which the domestic violence matter is to be dealt with is such as to render legal aid by a salaried legal practitioner uneconomic, the Principal of the Justice Centre may authorise the legal aid officer concerned in writing to provide legal aid in a domestic violence matter by means of Judicare. The tariff applicable to such Judicare matters shall be that set out in Annexure F.4 hereto.

3.3.1.14 In any matter in which, in the opinion of the CEO, the benefit or the potential benefit to the client does not justify the anticipated costs of the contemplated litigation.

3.3.1.15 In any inquest on a Judicare basis save with the prior consent of the CEO.

3.3.2 The prohibitions set out in paragraph 3.3.1 above shall not however prevent the rendering of legal aid, with the consent of the CEO, by any legal practitioner in the full time employ of the Board or employed by a Co-operation Partner pursuant to the provisions of a Co-operation Agreement, in a matter otherwise excluded in terms of this Guide.

3.3.2.1 In all civil matters including all labour matters, divorce cases, labour tenant matters and ESTA cases the legal applicant shall not be entitled, as of right, to the provision of a second or subsequent legal practitioner. If the legal aid applicant has dismissed the first legal practitioner appointed on a legal aid basis or has caused the first legal practitioner so appointed to withdraw by lack of co-operation, unless the legal aid applicant satisfies the CEO that the first legal practitioner was dismissed or obliged to withdraw for good cause.

3.3.3.2 The prohibition in previous editions of this Guide in respect of legal aid for maintenance and domestic violence matters is removed. Legal aid may be granted for the prosecution or defence of a claim in terms of the Maintenance Act No 99 of 1998. Legal aid may likewise be granted for the prosecution or defence of an interdict in respect of domestic violence. In respect of maintenance and domestic violence matters the Board will provide indigent legal aid applicants with:

3.3.3.2.1 An initial consultation to advise a prospective litigant as to his/her rights, the procedure to be followed and the prospects of success;

3.3.3.2.2 Legal representation in respect of any court hearing but only if the legal aid recipients claims/defences have a reasonable prospect of success and then only if the opposing party either is an admitted legal practitioner or is represented by an admitted legal practitioner;

3.3.3.3 As with all legal aid instructions (see paragraph 1.2 of Annexure O) the legal aid officer must first ascertain whether a maintenance or domestic violence matter can be taken on by a Justice Centre before issuing a Judicare instruction in respect thereof.

3.3.3.4 Legal practitioners who conduct maintenance or domestic violence matters on a Judicare basis will be remunerated in accordance with Annexure F.4 hereto.

3.4 LABOUR MATTERS

3.4.1 Subject to paragraph 3.3.1 above legal aid shall be allowed in labour matters only to the following extent:

3.4.1.1 The date of the alleged unfair labour practice is the deciding factor in determining the procedure to be followed by the legal aid officer.

3.4.1.2 All those disputes, which arose before 11 November 1996, should be dealt with in terms of the old Labour Relations Act, 1956 (Act 28 of 1956). Therefore, such matters should be dealt with in terms of paragraph 3.2.2 of the 1996 Guide;

3.4.1.3 Any dispute that arose after 11 November 1996 should be dealt with in terms of the new Labour Relations Act, 1995 (Act 66 of 1995).

3.4.1.4 In cases where the disputes arose after 11 November 1996, the applicant should first be referred to the nearest office of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) for conciliation proceedings.

3.4.1.5 If the conciliation fails and the Commissioner recommends assistance or representation by a legal practitioner in the Labour Court, he/she will provide the legal aid applicant with the necessary documentation to this effect. On receipt of this, the legal aid applicant should take such to the nearest legal aid officer and apply for legal aid. Applicants not in possession of such documentation should be referred back to the CCMA. If the applicant qualifies for legal aid under the Board's normal criteria for civil matters, an instruction for a merit report in terms of paragraph 3.8.2 should be issued to a legal practitioner. This instruction should stipulate that the merit report should reach the Board's head office within 14 days of instruction in order for the CEO to make a decision and timeously notify the CCMA on the outcome.

3.5 LEGAL AID FOR CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURES IN LABOUR MATTERS

3.5.1 Despite the contents of paragraph 3.4.1.4 above, legal aid officers should note that in terms of paragraph 3.3.1.7, the Board does not generally render Judicare legal aid for arbitration, mediation, conciliation or any other forms of alternative dispute resolution as at date of implementation of this Guide.

3.5.2 Although section 149(1)(b) of the new Labour Relations Act, 1995 (Act 66 of 1995) suggests that the Commission will, in co-ordination with the Board, make provision for legal assistance/advice in other forms of dispute resolution, than litigation, no agency agreement has been entered into by these two parties at date of implementation of this Guide.

3.5.3 Should a legal aid officer receive a request from the CCMA directly to issue an instruction for legal representation in conciliation, arbitration or mediation, it will unfortunately have to be turned down. The reply should quote paragraph 3.3.1.6.

3.6 DIVORCE CASES AND FAMILY LAW MATTERS.

3.6.1 Judicare Legal aid will not be rendered in a divorce case if:

3.6.1.1 there is a reasonable possibility of reconciliation. The applicant must indicate at the time of application what steps have been taken and what proposals have been made to resolve the dispute; or

3.6.1.2 the CEO is of the view that proper and sufficient attention has not been given to settling the dispute; or

3.6.1.3 considering all the circumstances, it does not appear to the CEO to be a deserving case; or

3.6.1.4 as in the case of any other matter (see paragraph 1.2 of Annexure O hereto), there is a salaried legal practitioner at a Justice Centre available to take on the matter; or

3.6.1.5 then provisions of paragraph 3.3.1.7 above apply.

3.6.2 Legal aid shall only be granted to proceed with the variation or enforcement of a divorce order when the issue in dispute deals with the custody of children or access to the children and the application is supported by a report of a social worker or the Family Advocate. In the case of the Family Advocate declining to render a report before the institution of proceedings, such proceedings may be instituted but shall thereafter be held in abeyance the receipt of the report of the Family Advocate.

3.6.3 If a legal aid officer, at a branch office of the Board, has reliable information at his disposal that the other party in a divorce action has the financial ability to make a contribution towards costs or to pay the costs, he must first grant legal aid for a Rule 43 application, in which is claimed, inter alia, a contribution towards costs. If the outcome of the Rule 43 application has not been sufficiently successful, a further application for legal aid may be made. (See paragraph 4.1.12).

An official of the Department of Justice acting on behalf of the Board at the seat of the court may not grant permission to bring a Rule 43 application without the specific consent of the CEO in the particular matter concerned.

3.6.4 If legal aid is granted for the institution of a divorce action, the action must be instituted in the Divorce Court unless the
CEO grants prior approval for the institution thereof in another court.

3.6.5 The attorney who acts for the legal aid applicant in his/her capacity, as plaintiff must include a prayer for costs in the summons. An endeavour must be made throughout to recover and/or to enforce an order for costs against the defendant subject to paragraph 3.3.1.1 above.

3.6.6 Paragraphs 5.12.1 and 5.15.2 must be borne in mind at all times. The following must be submitted on completion of the matter:

3.6.6.1 final account;

3.6.6.2 copy of final order;

3.6.6.3 copy of settlement agreement (if any);

3.6.6.4 report on the Benefit accrued to the Board and how paragraph 5.19 will be complied with;

3.6.6.5 report on the cost aspect and its recoverability. Failure to comply herewith will necessarily result in a delay in payment of accounts. See also paragraphs 5.13.2, 5.13.3 and 5.16.

3.6.7 Where legal aid is sought for the dissolution of a customary union, the applicant's attorney must furnish a report to the CEO dealing with the items listed below as well as any others, which may be of importance.

3.6.7.1 Are there any children involved? Provide full details.

3.6.7.2 Has this union been registered? Provide full details.

3.6.7.3 State the number of wives involved as well as the form of each "marriage".

3.6.7.4 Are the whereabouts of the other party/parties known?

3.6.7.5 Provide full details in respect of all disputes involved and any possible disputes, which may be anticipated.

3.6.7.6 Provide an estimate of the value of the estate(s) to be dissolved.

3.6.7.7 Provide an estimate of the cost of the case.

3.6.7.8 Has the applicant provided a satisfactory explanation as to why reconciliation is not possible?

3.6.7.9 Has the applicant previously applied for legal aid in order to dissolve the union?

3.6.7.10 What are the possible implications of lobola, if any?

3.6.7.11 In the case of any polygamous marriage a copy of the written contract which the court approves in terms of the Recognition of the Customary Marriages Act must be forwarded to the CEO. The implications of the said contract on the proprietary regime of the legal aid recipient and its bearing on the assets and liabilities of the legal aid recipient must also be spelt out.

3.7 RESIDENCE OF APPLICANT AND SEAT OF COURT

3.7.1 Except in matters excluded from the scheme or which are excluded by the Board from time to time, legal aid shall ordinarily be rendered to any indigent person and any other person entitled thereto in terms of Sections 35(2)(c), 35(3)(g) and 28(1)(h) of the Constitution (or in terms of any co-operation agreement concluded by the Board) who is ordinarily resident in the Republic of South Africa. The CEO may grant legal aid in exceptional circumstances if in a matter in which legal aid is sought the issues are justiciable in a Court of the Republic of South Africa, but the legal aid applicant is not ordinarily resident in the Republic of South Africa. The residence requirement set out in this paragraph shall not apply to matters to enforce rights in terms of the Constitution, 1996. No legal aid will be provided whatsoever in respect of any litigation in any foreign court.

3.7.2 The enquiry as to whether or not a person is ordinarily resident in the Republic of South Africa is a factual enquiry to be conducted as at the date of application. It is not dependent on the legal question of whether or not the legal aid applicant is legally entitled to be ordinarily resident in the Republic of South Africa.

3.7.3 The requirement of ordinary residence set out in this paragraph 3.7 shall not apply to Asylum Seekers and Hague Convention matters.

3.7.4 Where in a matter in respect of which legal aid has been granted evidence is to be heard on commission outside the borders of the Republic of South Africa in respect of a matter to be heard in a Court of the Republic of South Africa, the CEO may, if in his/her opinion funds are available for the purpose and good reason exists therefore, authorise one or more legal practitioners to attend at such commission on a legal aid basis.

3.8 PERSONAL DISQUALIFICATION

3.8.1 If there is good reason to believe that an applicant is wilfully abstaining from entering into employment which is within his/her capabilities or that he/she resigned from employment, merely to obtain legal aid, assistance shall be refused/suspended.

3.8.2 In civil matters, the Board must always be satisfied that there are merits to the case. If there is not a reasonable prospect of success and recovery, legal aid will be refused. In order to determine these issues, the legal aid officer must always issue an instruction in civil matters as follows:

"T
o investigate a civil claim/defend a civil action (state legal problem here) and to submit a report in terms of paragraph 3.8.2 of the Guide before further costs are incurred."

The attorney must, when submitting such a report, furnish the following information:

3.8.2.1 whether the legal aid applicant is plaintiff/applicant or defendant/respondent;

3.8.2.2 the court where the matter is to be heard;

3.8.2.3 the nature and amount of the claim;

3.8.2.4 the factual background to the matter;

3.8.2.5 full details of the merits of the matter and a detailed explanation of the success, which may be expected;

3.8.2.6 the availability of evidence and witnesses;

3.8.2.7 the need for experts and the expected costs relating to their evidence and testimony and that of other witnesses; (See Annexure J.)

3.8.2.8 the expected date for hearing and the anticipated duration of the trial;

3.8.2.9 the financial ability of the other side to satisfy the claim and costs if the legal aid applicant is successful;

3.8.2.10 the expected defences to be raised;

3.8.2.11 the stage to which the matter has progressed as at the date of application and all cost implications of such proceedings;

3.8.2.12 the nature and effect of any prior orders in the matter;

3.8.2.13 the possibility of settlement of all or part of the dispute; and

3.8.2.14 the total expected financial involvement of the Board.

3.8.3 At least four weeks before the hearing or, if legal aid is granted within a shorter period before the hearing, at the time of legal aid being granted, the attorney himself/herself or where an attorney has instructed an advocate, both jointly, must furnish the CEO with a full and comprehensive budget of the expected expenditure for the hearing and a re- evaluation of the issues referred to in paragraphs 3.8.2.5 to 3.8.2.9, 3.8.2.13 and 3.8.2.14 and any other relevant information which can be reasonably expected to be necessary for the CEO to decide whether to proceed with the action or to dispose of it in some other manner. If, at any stage during proceedings, circumstances change so as to differ from those already communicated to the CEO, such change in circumstances must forthwith be conveyed to the CEO, and if necessary, the matter must stand down or a short postponement be arranged in order to communicate with the CEO and make a decision on the further availability of legal aid.

3.8.4 The provisions of paragraph 3.8.3 shall also be applicable retrospectively to all matters where legal aid has already been granted and which are in process of finalisation.

3.8.5 Should it be necessary to prevent prescription taking place or a default judgement being taken, the attorney may take reasonable steps to protect the rights of the legal aid applicant while simultaneously complying with the provisions of paragraph 3.8.2 or while awaiting the CEO’s response to the legal practitioner’s report in terms of paragraph 3.8.2.

3.8.6 A legal practitioner who undertakes and completes a merit assessment report as required by paragraph 3.8.2 should be entitled to remuneration in accordance with the applicable tariff. However, the CEO may, in his/her sole discretion waive such a limitation and pay an increased fee where exceptional circumstances may justify this.

3.8.7 If after receiving a legal practitioner’s report in terms of paragraph 3.8.2 or 3.8.3 or 4.9.4 the CEO elects to authorise the legal practitioner to proceed with the matter on a legal aid basis such authorisation shall be limited to either the total expected financial involvement of the Board last reported by the legal practitioner or the total financial involvement of the Board expressly authorised by the CEO, which ever is the lesser.

3.9 THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION

3.9.1 Prior to 1st April 1999 the Board acted as the agent of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission for the provision of the legal representation envisaged in Section 34 of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act No 35 of 1995. This was in circumstances in which the persons entitled to legal representation were neither able to afford the cost of their own legal representation nor entitled to be represented by the State Attorney.

3.9.2 With effect from 1st April 1999, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission has itself provided the requisite legal representation. It follows that the Board will entertain no new applications for legal representation.

3.9.3 Any person who applies for legal representation in respect of any legal proceedings before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is to be referred to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission at PO Box 3162, Cape Town, 8001, Fax (021) 424-5225.

3.9.4 Likewise any legal practitioner who claims that any amount is owing to him/her in respect of any legal representation provided before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission whether before or after 1st April 1999 and whether pursuant to a legal aid instruction or otherwise is to be referred to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

3.9.5 Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing shall prevent any legal aid officer from considering any application for legal aid in the normal manner in relation to any contemplated review of any proceedings before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

3.10 THE COMMISSION ON THE RESTITUTION OF LAND RIGHTS

3.10.1 Prior to 1st April 1998, the Board acted as the agent of the Commission on Restitution of Land Rights ("the Commission") for the provision of the legal representation envisaged under Section 29(2) of The Restitution of Land Rights Act ("the RLR Act"). In respect of legal aid granted before 1st April 1998, the Board is still entitled to be reimbursed by the Commission for any fees and disbursements incurred pursuant to the grant of such an instruction irrespective of the date on which such fees or disbursements were incurred. After 1st April 1998 legal aid continues to be available in respect of matters under the RLR Act with the only material difference being that in respect of such matters the Board acts as a principal and not as an agent.

3.10.2 The RLR Act provides for the restitution of rights in land, whether registered or unregistered, in respect of which persons or communities were dispossessed on or after 19 June 1913 under or for the purpose of furthering the object of any racially based discriminatory law.

3.10.3 The RLR Act prescribes a procedure in respect of such claims, which is very broadly as follows:

3.10.3.1 The claimant lodges a claim with the Commission.

3.10.3.2 The Commission investigates the claim.

3.10.3.3 If there are competing claims to a particular right in land, the Commission endeavours to mediate between the parties.

3.10.3.4 If the mediation is not successful, the matter may be referred to Court.

3.10.3.5 The Court has a variety of powers, including the power to order restitution or compensation or to recommend to the Minister of Land Affairs that a claimant be given priority access to State resources in the allocation and development of housing and land.

3.10.3.6 In certain circumstances, an amendment to the RLR Act permits a claimant to bypass the Commission and proceed directly to court.

3.10.4 Section 29(2) of the RLR Act provides that:

"Where a party cannot afford to pay for legal representation itself the Chief Land Claims Commissioner may take steps to arrange legal representation for such party, either through the State legal aid system or, if necessary, at the expense of the Commission."

3.10.5 The Commission does not itself have the necessary structures in place to provide legal aid. Section 2 of the Legal Aid Act, No. 22 of 1969 authorises the Board to provide legal aid to "indigent persons". The definition of an "indigent person" in paragraph 1.1 of the Guide has been amended to include certain legal personalities.

(It is incidentally to be noted that the RLR Act defines a "community" as. "... any group of persons whose rights in land are derived from shared rules determining access to land held in common by such group, and includes part of any such group". The RLR Act further describes "a person" as including a community or part thereof and defines a "person" as meaning "a community or organisation or part thereof".) If it is necessary for a legal aid officer to determine whether a community or organisation or part thereof is indigent reference should he had to paragraph 2.7 above. If legal aid is authorised in respect of a community or organisation or part thereof the full names and particulars of all the natural persons making up such community or organisation or part thereof must be recorded by the legal aid officer in a schedule annexed to the legal aid instruction.

3.10.6 Legal aid is available in respect of claims under the RLR Act only for proceedings before the Land Claims Court and matters reasonably incidental thereto. Legal aid is not available in respect of the claim lodgement, investigation and mediation phases.

3.10.7 The Commission will decide:

3.10.7.1 Whether any matter is ripe for hearing before the Land Claims Court (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph 3.10 as "the Court");

3.10.7.2 Whether it, in principle, wishes the Board to consider an application for legal aid in respect of any particular matter.

3.10.8 Where the Commission decides that a matter is ripe to proceed to the Land Claims Court and that it wishes the Board to consider an application for legal aid it will address a suitable letter to the appropriate branch office of the Board. A pro forma letter to be used by the Commission is annexed hereto marked D.1. The completed copy of Annexure D.1 hereto will be handed/forwarded by the Commission to the applicant or its representative who will approach the relevant legal aid officer therewith. Therefore, if any applicant approaches any legal aid officer for legal aid in respect of a claim before the Land Claims Court under the RLR Act without a duly completed original letter as per Annexure D.1 the legal aid officer must refer the applicant back to the local office of the Commission. A list of the various offices of the Commission and relevant details in respect thereof is set out in Annexure B.3 hereto.

3.10.9 Where the applicant for legal aid is a natural person, the legal aid officer will execute the means test calculation as set out in Annexures C and G.1 of the Guide.

3.10.10 If an applicant qualifies for legal aid the legal aid officer will issue a legal aid instruction (LA 2 form) in favour of the applicant to an attorney selected from the civil rotation list.

3.10.10.1 The top right hand corner of the instruction must be marked:
"CRLR Section 29
Reference No . ……………".

The reference number to be inserted is the claim number of the Commission appearing on Annexure D.1 hereto.

3.10.10.2 All such legal aid instructions issued by legal aid officers are subject to the submission, by the attorney instructed, to the CEO of the Board of a detailed report in terms of paragraph 3.8.2/4.9.4 of the Guide. Save that a legal practitioner may always take such steps as are necessary to interrupt prescription or to prevent default judgement, the legal practitioner instructed by the Board is not permitted to take any further steps in the matter until the CEO's authorisation pursuant to the report in terms of paragraph 3.8.2/4.9.4 of the Guide has been granted.

3.10.10.3 A copy of the completed Annexure D.1 hereto must be annexed to the A and C copy of each and every legal aid instruction.

3.10.10.4 The original means test calculation, if any, must be annexed to the C copy of every legal aid instruction.

3.10.11 Legal aid practitioners should take note of the following provisions applicable to legal aid instructions issued in respect of matters under the RLR Act:

3.10.11.1 Where fees and disbursements of any legal practitioner are, in the aggregate, calculated or likely to exceed R10 000,00 in respect of any single legal aid instruction, prior written authorisation to proceed/continue with the matter will have to be obtained from both the CEO of the Board and the Commission.

3.10.11.2 Where the fees and disbursements of any single expert witness are, in the aggregate, likely or calculated to exceed R5 000,00, prior written authorisation for the employment of such expert witness will have to be obtained from both the CEO of the Board and the Commission.

3.10.11.3 Prior written authorisation for the briefing of any senior counsel (S.C.) will have to be obtained from both the CEO of the Board and the Commission.

3.10.12 Requests from attorneys for the authorisations required in terms of paragraph 3.10.11 above should be directed to the CEO of the Board and a copy of such request should be forwarded, under a suitable covering letter, to the Chief Land Claims Commissioner at P0 Box 56720, Arcadia 0007, Fax No. (012) 341-4188.

3.10.13 In any matter before the Court in which any legal aid applicant seeks relief which will require the legal aid applicant's legal representatives to lead or cross-examine any witness giving evidence as to quantum, the legal aid applicant's attorney will be obliged to seek the consent of all other parties to the action, or in default thereof an order of the Court, to the effect that the merits of the matter should be decided and disposed of separately and before any hearing takes place as to the quantum of such relief.

3.10.14 The provisions of paragraph 5.19.1 and Annexures H.1 and H.2 of the Guide will not apply to legal aid applicants who receive legal aid in respect of claims under the RLR Act. The attention of legal practitioners is however specifically drawn to the fact that the waiver of the Benefit does not imply the waiver by the Board, of the right to recover costs from the legal aid applicant or any other person nor is the liability and responsibility of legal practitioners to safeguard the Board's and the Commission's rights in regard to costs in any way reduced.

3.10.15 The provisions of Section 8A of the Legal Aid Act, No. 22 of 1969 shall apply mutatis mutandis to all legal aid litigants to whom legal aid was granted pursuant to the provisions of the agency agreement between the Board and the Commission.

3.10.16 Appeals against the refusal of legal aid and/or objections against any aspect of/or limitation on legal aid will be dealt with by the Chief Land Claims Commissioner. The written representations of the applicant should be submitted to the Chief Land Claims Commissioner at the address set out above, whose decision shall be final.

3.10.17 For good reason, which shall include, but not by way of limitation, the incompetence or inexperience of any legal practitioner, the Chief Land Claims Commissioner shall be entitled to request the Board to terminate the mandate of any legal practitioner in any particular matter and/or to refrain from granting any further legal aid instructions to any particular legal practitioner.

3.10.18 In respect of outstanding claims under the agency agreement, the Board will account to the Commissioner monthly or at such intervals as the Board, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

3.10.18.1 All such accounts shall set out a summary of expenditure incurred and the costs recovered (if any) together with appropriate references and a calculation of the amount owing by the Commission to the Board. Appropriate vouchers as obtained by the Board from the legal practitioners or persons who rendered legal aid services shall support all such accounts.

3.10.18.2 The Board shall account to the Commission in respect of net actual expenditure and receipts. Therefore any discount or allowances which the Board receives from any legal practitioner or any other service provider will be passed on to the Commission. The Board will credit the Commission with costs recovered when such are actually received, whether by set-off or otherwise, from any legal practitioner instructed by the Board.

3.10.18.3 The Commission will reimburse the Board within 30 days of receipt of the Board's accounting to the Commission.

3.10.18.4 The Board will not be obliged to retain copies of any vouchers submitted by it to the Commission.

3.10.18.5 The Commission will be responsible for the orderly filing and safekeeping of said vouchers. It will permit the Board and its auditors reasonable access thereto during normal business hours for a period of seven years calculated from the date on which the Board accounted to the Commission in respect of such voucher.

3.11 LABOUR TENANT AND ESTA MATTERS

3.11 Legal Aid is available for persons affected by the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act 1996 (Act 3 of 1996) and the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 (Act 62 of 1997) (ESTA)

3.11.1 Section 1 of the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act 1996 defines a labour tenant as follows:

"Labour tenant means a person -

(a) Who is residing or has the right to reside on a farm:

(b) Who has or has had the right to use cropping or grazing land on the farm referred to in paragraph (a) or another farm of the owner, and in consideration of such right provides or has provided labour to the owner or lessee; and

(c) Whose parent or grandparent resided or resides on the farm and had the use of cropping or grazing land on such farm or another farm of the owner, and in consideration of such right provided or provides labour to the owner or lessee of such or such other farm,

including a person who has been appointed a successor to a labour tenant in accordance with the provisions of Section 3(4) and (5) but excluding a farm worker."


3.11.2.1 The Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 deals with the rights of occupiers and owners of land. The scope of the Act is set out in Section 2(1) thereof:

"2(1) Subject to the provisions of Section 4, this Act shall apply to all land other than land in a township established, approved, proclaimed or otherwise recognised as such in terms of any law, or encircled by such a township or townships but including –

(b) any land within such township which has been designated for agricultural purposes in terms of any law, and

(c) any land within such a township which has been established, approved, proclaimed or otherwise recognised after 4 February 1997, in respect only of a person who was an occupier immediately prior to such establishment, approval, proclamation or recognition."

3.11.2.2 Section 1 of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 defines an occupier (hereinafter referred to as an "ESTA Occupier") as follows:

Occupier means a person residing on land which belongs to another person, or who has on 4 February 1997 or thereafter had consent or another right in law to do so, but excluding -

(a) A labour tenant in terms of the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act, 1996 (Act No. 3 of 1996); and

(b) A person using or intending to use the land in question mainly for industrial, mining, commercial or commercial farming purposes, but including a person who works the land himself or herself and does not employ any person who is not a member of his or her family; and

(c) A person who has an income more than the prescribed amount,"

The prescribed amount for the purposes of the above definition is currently R5 000,00 per month.

3.11.2.3 Although not restricted to farm labourers, it is clear that a large number of the persons effected by the provisions of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 will be farm labourers and farmers/farm owners.

3.11.3 Save as set out below, cases involving labour tenants and farm labourers are to be dealt with by legal aid officers as if they were normal civil matters. Therefore, if the legal aid applicant qualifies for legal aid, a legal aid instruction is to be issued for a merit report before proceeding with the case. The exceptions to the general provisions of the Legal Aid Guide are as follows:

3.11.3.1 Where legal aid is not normally granted to a defendant/respondent prior to the institution of action, legal aid may be granted to a labour tenant or ESTA Occupier if he/she satisfies the legal aid officer that he/she and/or members of his/her family are threatened with eviction. Labour tenants and farm labourers are frequently illiterate or semi-literate persons, who are ill equipped to distinguish between a summons or notice of motion on the one hand and a letter or other notice to vacate on the other hand.

3.11.3.2 Legal aid applicants are normally required to apply for legal aid either in the magisterial district where they reside or in the magisterial district where the contemplated litigation is to be conducted. In the case of labour tenants and ESTA Occupiers, the legal aid applicant is to be permitted to make application for legal aid to any legal aid officer within the province within which the dispute arises. In many rural areas labour tenants and farm labourers will of necessity have had to travel long distances to make application for legal aid. To tell such a person that he/she has to undertake a further lengthy journey to apply for legal aid through another legal aid officer is likely to undermine confidence in the legal system.

3.11.3.3 In the case of labour tenants and farm labourers the successful legal aid applicant is to be permitted to choose an attorney who practises within the province within which the dispute arises. In many rural areas local attorneys are unwilling to act against prominent local farmers. Where however an attorney who is instructed from outside the magisterial district within which the dispute arises, the legal aid instruction issued should expressly exclude the payment of travelling costs. On receipt of representations from the legal aid practitioner setting out good cause, the CEO may lift this restriction.

3.11.3.4 Where it is unclear whether the legal aid applicant is a labour tenant or a farm labourer, legal aid may be granted in the alternative - e.g.

"To submit a report to the CEO in terms of paragraph 3.8.2 of the Legal Aid Guide and thereafter, provided the CEO so directs, to defend the legal aid applicant under Case No. 12345/01 in the Magisterial District of Vryheid in terms of the provisions of the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act, 1996 alternatively the provisions of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997."

3.11.3.5 In any matter in which legal aid is granted pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 3.11, the legal aid instruction is to contain a clear reference to either the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act, 1996 and/or the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997.

3.11.3.6 The CEO may, in his discretion and on receipt of satisfactory written representations setting out good cause, extend the mandate of any legal aid practitioner to act in any labour tenant or ESTA matter to include legal proceedings in the High Court and/or the Land Claims Court.

3.11.3.7 Where it is apparent to any legal aid officer that judgement has already been granted against any labour tenant or ESTA occupier, an instruction must initially be issued for the launching of an application for rescission of judgement - e.g.

"To submit a report to the CEO in terms of paragraph 3.8.2 of the Legal Aid Guide and thereafter, provided so directed by the CEO, to proceed with an application for rescission of judgement under Case No. 67890/01 in the Magistrate's Court for the District of Piet Retief, the legal aid applicant claiming protection in terms of the provisions of the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act, 1996 and/or the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997."

3.11.3.8 In labour tenant and ESTA matters where litigation has already commenced the CEO may, in his or her discretion, authorise the conduct of mediation, arbitration or alternative dispute resolution on a legal aid basis if satisfied by written representations from the legal practitioner concerned that such are likely to lead to the elimination or curtailment of litigation, and that such are calculated to reduce the fees and disbursements that would otherwise be payable by the Board. Where mediation is authorised by the CEO, the attorney instructed on a legal aid basis will be entitled to receive payment in respect of the necessary work executed and disbursements incurred in relation thereto at R35,00 excluding VAT per 15 minutes. The CEO, on a case-by-case basis, may limit the maximum fees, if any, payable in respect of the conduct of mediation, arbitration or alternative dispute resolution. The Department of Land Affairs must be approached to arrange for the services of the mediator at that Department's expense.

3.11.3.9 The fact that legal aid is granted to any labour tenant or ESTA Occupier shall not preclude any legal aid officer from considering any application for legal aid to any landowner or farmer. Where, however, legal aid has been provisionally granted to both opposing parties in any dispute, such fact is forthwith to be drawn to the attention of the CEO in writing by the legal aid officer concerned. In the exercise of his discretion, the CEO may authorise the continuation of legal aid to opposing parties in any labour tenant or ESTA matter, if satisfied by way of written representations by the legal practitioners concerned that both parties have a reasonable prospect of success; and that either or both parties are likely to take the law into their own hands if the dispute is not resolved by litigation, arbitration, mediation or alternative dispute resolution.

3.11.3.10 Any concession, relaxation or special arrangement set out in this paragraph 3.11 and applicable to any labour tenant or ESTA occupier shall apply mutatis mutandis to any land owner or farmer involved in any dispute governed by the Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act, 1996 and/or the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 if he/she satisfies a legal aid officer that he/she is entitled to legal aid.

3.11.3.11 In the exercise of his discretion, the CEO may authorise the payment of interim fees in any labour tenant or ESTA matter in which the legal practitioner concerned makes written representation to the CEO, setting out the details of not less than ten other labour tenant and/or ESTA matters in which the legal practitioner is simultaneously acting on a legal aid basis; and details of the extent to which the cash flow of the practice of the legal practitioner concerned will be adversely affected by having to wait until the finalisation of the matter before receiving payment of fees.

3.11.3.12 The conduct of labour tenant and ESTA matters on a legal aid basis necessarily requires the instruction of legal practitioners who are acquainted with the legislation in question and reasonably proficient in such matters. In the exercise of his discretion, the CEO may terminate the mandate of any legal practitioner instructed on a legal aid basis in any labour tenant or ESTA matter in which he/she is not satisfied that the legal practitioner instructed on a legal aid basis has the necessary expertise and proficiency.

3.12 ASYLUM SEEKERS

3.12.1 With effect from the date on which this Guide comes into operation legal aid shall be available to Asylum Seekers applying or intending to apply for Asylum in terms of Chapters 3 and 4 of the Refugees Act No. 130 of 1998. ("the Refugees Act").

3.12.2 The provisions of this Guide, in respect of legal aid in civil matters shall apply mutatis mutandis to Asylum matters except that:

3.12.2.1 It shall not be necessary for the Asylum Seeker applying for legal aid in respect of an Asylum matter to be ordinarily resident in South Africa and it shall be sufficient if as at the date of the application for legal aid the said Asylum Seeker is physically present in South Africa.

3.12.2.2 An Asylum Seeker who applies for legal aid for purposes of an application for Asylum in terms of Section 21 of the Refugees Act may apply anywhere in South Africa but an Asylum Seeker who applies for legal aid for the purpose of acquiring legal representation in respect of proceedings in terms of Sections 24 (decision by a Refugee Status Determination Officer), 25 (Review by the Standing Committee) or 26 (Appeals to the Appeal Board) of the Refugees Act may only apply in Pretoria, Johannesburg, Cape Town, Port Elizabeth or Durban.

3.12.3 If legal aid is granted for the purposes of an application for Asylum in terms of Section 21 of the Refugees Act the mandate of any legal practitioner so instructed shall terminate once the application is lodged and the legal practitioner reports and accounts to the CEO.

3.12.4 The report of the legal practitioner required in terms of paragraph 3.12.3 above shall include:

3.12.4.1 A copy of the application as lodged.

3.12.4.2 A brief opinion by the legal practitioner concerned of the merits of the application.

3.12.4.3 Any reference number accorded to the application by the Refugee Reception Officer.

The legal aid officers of Pretoria, Johannesburg, Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and Durban shall when distributing legal aid instructions in respect of proceedings in terms of Sections 24, 25 and/or 26 of the Refugees Act, give preference firstly to any Co-operation Partner who specialises in such work, secondly to Justice Centres in accordance with paragraph 1.2 of Annexure O hereto and thereafter to legal practitioners in private practice in accordance with the applicable rotation list.

The fees and disbursements allowable in respect of Asylum matters dealt with on a Judicare basis shall be as per Annexure F.5 hereto.

3.13 HAGUE CONVENTION MATTERS

3.13.1 Legal aid is available to assist the Central Authority in South Africa in complying with its obligations in terms of Articles 7g and 26 of the Schedule to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Act No. 72 of 1996 ("the Hague Convention").

3.13.2 The provisions of this Guide in respect of legal aid in civil matters shall apply mutatis mutandis to Hague Convention matters except that:

3.13.2.1 It shall not be necessary for the applicant to be ordinarily resident in South Africa;

3.13.2.2 It will seldom, if ever, be possible for the legal aid applicant to appear in person before the legal aid officer to execute the means test and legal aid application;

3.13.2.3 If the legal aid applicant does not qualify in terms of the means test the CEO is to be notified forthwith so that he/she may advise the Central Authority thereof;

3.13.2.4 The legal practitioner instructed is not obliged to conduct any legal proceedings in the Divorce Courts and may elect to initiate proceedings in the appropriate Division of the High Court;

3.13.2.5 The legal practitioner to be instructed shall be selected by the CEO and not in accordance with Annexure O hereto. It follows that the CEO must be consulted by the legal aid officer before any instruction in respect of any Hague Convention matters is authorised. The CEO shall be entitled, but not obliged, to consult with the Central Authority, in selecting a competent legal practitioner to be instructed.

3.13.3 The CEO shall report on any legal aid instruction authorised in terms of the Hague Convention at the next ordinary meeting of the Board and in particular the CEO shall report as to what increased fees, if any, have been authorised.

3.13.4 The fees and disbursements allowable in respect of Hague Convention Matters dealt with on a Judicare basis shall be as per Annexure F hereto.

CHAPTER 4

OPERATION OF THE SCHEME AND FUNCTIONS OF LEGAL AID OFFICER

4.1 EVALUATION OF APPLICATION

4.1.1 Except in Labour Tenant and ESTA matters, in a magisterial district where the Board has no representative of its own and a legal aid officer has been designated at a magistrate's office, such officer's powers in respect of legal aid work in the Magistrate's Court shall be confined to matters to be heard within the jurisdiction of the magisterial district concerned unless either undue financial burden would otherwise be caused to the client or no legal aid officer has been appointed for an adjoining district. In the latter instance the CEO may permit a legal aid officer to grant legal aid in a matter to be heard in a different area of jurisdiction provided all the relevant information has been furnished to the CEO to enable him to make a decision.

4.1.1.2 In a magisterial district where the Board has no representative of its own and a legal aid officer has been designated at a magistrate's office, such officer's powers in respect of legal aid work in the High Court shall be confined to matters to be heard within the jurisdiction of the provincial division concerned, the Land Claims Court, the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court.

4.1.1.3 The jurisdictional restrictions set out in paragraphs 4.1.1.1 and 4.1.1.2 above shall not apply to any matter in which the legal aid applicant is a labour tenant, farm labourer, or farm owner and the litigation or contemplated litigation concerns the right of ownership or occupation of rural land or the right to use land for cropping or grazing purposes.

When a person approaches the legal aid officer for assistance, the officer must first determine whether it is indeed legal aid which is required and that the problem is a matter in which the Board renders assistance (See Chapter 3). If this is not the case, he/she must inform the applicant that the Board is not able to assist him/her. In the event of a State Department, agency or other institution possibly being in a position to be of assistance, he/she shall refer him/her to such institution.

If in fact legal aid is required in a matter in which the Board renders assistance, an application form (LA 1) must be completed by the applicant, or on his/her behalf where he/she is unable to deal with the matter personally. The legal aid officer must ensure that the form is properly completed.

The legal aid officer must then apply the prescribed means test and if the applicant does not qualify in terms thereof or for other reasons, the legal aid officer must inform him/her accordingly. The Board contemplates the implementation of a simplified procedure, which will apply where the legal aid applicant has no income, no assets of any commercial value and patently qualifies for legal aid. When the simplified procedure is introduced the legal aid officer will no longer be obliged to see to the completion of LA 13 forms but will instead be obliged to secure the signature or mark of the legal aid applicant to a statement on the LA 1 form confirming that the legal aid applicant has no income and no assets. The new simplified procedure will in due course be explained and introduced by a circular approved by the Board and signed by the CEO.

4.1.4 Should the legal aid applicant qualify, then the legal aid officer must complete an instruction form (LA 2), if possible in typewritten form, and refer the applicant to a legal practitioner in terms of the applicable system of rotation (see paragraph 4.2 below). If the legal practitioner to be instructed was requested by the client and the CEO acceded to such request this fact must be recorded on the form, alternatively the appointment must be done on the rotational basis. In general the successful legal aid applicant does not have a right to choose the legal practitioner to represent him/her and the legal aid officer must distribute legal aid work in accordance with Annexure O hereto.

4.1.5 The legal aid officer, as far as possible, shall verify the correctness and completeness of all particulars furnished by an applicant. Wherever appropriate, documentary proof must be called for in regard to the applicant’s income, expenditure, assets and liabilities.

4.1.6 The legal aid officer wherever possible should ascertain whether -

all dependent children named are, in fact actually supported by the applicant;

4.1.6.2 the applicant has previously been refused legal aid in respect of the same matter, elsewhere;

4.1.6.3 the applicant in an intended divorce action has attempted to settle the issues. Information must be provided concerning proposals or steps taken;

4.1.6.4 the applicant has not already engaged an attorney about his problem and is merely using the Board to obtain a second opinion;

4.1.7 In the event of any suspicion of irregularity or abuse, the matter must be referred to the CEO. Full reasons must be submitted so that the CEO can make a proper decision.

4.1.8 An applicant, to whom legal aid is rendered concerning divorce proceedings, must himself/herself and at his/her own expense obtain a marriage certificate.

4.1.9 The means test for "single persons and estranged spouses" (see Annexure C.1) must be applied to applications for aid in connection with matrimonial actions between spouses.

4.1.10 In applications for the variation of a final divorce order with regard to the custody of children or access to children a social worker's report should always be called for, but may be dispensed with where a Family Advocate is able to furnish this report. If a possible delay in obtaining a report will endanger the children, the report may be dispensed with and the reasons must be set out briefly on the instruction form (LA 2-C). These instances must be referred to the CEO for approval before instructions are given to the attorney.

4.1.11 When both parties apply for legal aid in divorce matters, the matter must be referred to the CEO for a decision as to the further conduct of the matter. In such cases an indication must be given of the following:

4.1.11.1 in whose care any children are;

4.1.11.2 whether the children, if any, are legally supported by either party and whether documentary proof has been submitted to that effect; and

4.1.11.3 what merits exist with regard to a possible settlement of the action.

4.1.12 If there is a reasonable prospect of success in obtaining a contribution towards costs and interim relief for maintenance etc., approval should be given to bring a Rule 43 application. (See paragraph 3.6.3). This will play a role in deciding on whether or not legal aid should thereafter be granted. The Rule 43 application should not primarily be brought only for interim maintenance and custody. Consideration at all times shall be given to the obtaining of a contribution to costs under this procedure. If the contribution towards costs ordered in the Rule 43 application is less than the amount of legal aid required, legal aid may be granted for the shortfall. If the award is greater than the amount allocated for legal aid, further assistance should not be given, but in this instance the costs order in respect of the Rule 43 application will in terms of Section 8A of the Act accrue to the Board and the normal costs provisions will apply. A legal aid officer in employ of the Board may personally authorise the institution of a Rule 43 application. Other legal aid officers must refer such matters to the CEO for a decision. The tariffs for Rule 43 applications are set out in Annexure F.2.

When a legal aid applicant applies for legal aid in respect of an interdict in relation to a matrimonial matter, this must be referred to the CEO for a decision and information must be furnished with regard to -

4.1.13.1 the grounds for the application;

4.1.13.2 in the case of an interdict to protect life and/or the safeguarding of property, how real the threat is;

4.1.13.3 what effect it will have on the children of the marriage, (where applicable); and

4.1.13.4 why an interdict is the only remedy that could be utilised.

4.2 CHOICE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE

4.2.1 In criminal matters, legal aid officers must distribute criminal instructions in accordance with the rules and procedures set out in Annexure O hereto.

4.2.2 In civil matters:

4.2.2.1 No legal aid applicant will, save as otherwise herein specifically provided for, have the right to choose the legal practitioner who will be assigned to him/her in any civil matter.

4.2.2.2 The provisions of Annexure O relating to the distribution of legal aid instructions will apply mutatis mutandis to civil matters. Legal aid officers, in respect of civil matters in the High Court and civil matters in the Magistrate's Courts, will maintain separate rotation lists.

4.2.3 Exclusionary list:
Certain legal practitioner's names may from time to time appear on the exclusionary list, compiled by the Board, of legal practitioners to whom matters must not be referred. Care must be taken to ensure that this exclusionary list is adhered to and that no legal practitioner whose name appears on the exclusionary list receives any legal aid instructions.

4.2.4 Co-accused/co-litigants:
Where more than one legal aid applicant applies for legal aid in respect of any particular matter, the legal aid officer will enquire of the legal aid applicants as to whether there is any conflict of interest between them. Unless such conflict of interest is disclosed to the legal aid officer, the legal aid officer shall instruct a single legal practitioner to represent all legal aid applicants. If a conflict of interest is disclosed, the legal aid officer shall instruct a separate legal practitioner in respect of each legal aid applicants or group of legal aid applicants. Where a single legal practitioner is instructed in respect of more than one legal aid applicant, this shall be done by setting out the details of the first legal aid applicant on the LA 2 form and detailing the particulars of the remaining legal aid applicants in Annexures thereto. The legal practitioner who receives a single legal aid instruction in respect of more than one legal aid applicant must ensure, ab initio, that no conflict of interest exists between his/her clients. In the event of any such conflict of interest emerging, the legal aid instruction must be returned to the legal aid officer under cover of a suitable letter so that separate legal aid instructions may be issued to other legal practitioners.

4.3 COMPLETION AND SAFEKEEPING OF DOCUMENTS

4.3.1 Legal aid forms must be completed in full in a clearly legible manner. Particulars of the action, charge or legal issues, the extent of the assistance required and the particular court briefly but clearly shall be stated. It must, for example, not simply be stated that legal aid has been granted for "civil action", "claim for damages" or "criminal case" or "continuation of action or proceedings". The provisions of paragraph 3.8.2 should be used as a Guide as to what information is required.

4.3.2 Legal aid officers must, where necessary, should assist the applicant with the completion of the application forms.

The particulars of the person, in whose favour the legal aid is required, must be filled in on the application form. Great care should be exercised in obtaining the correct first names and surname. If the person is, however, a dependent minor, his parents or particulars of guardian must be also be obtained and recorded. This must also be indicated on the instruction form. If a minor is self-supporting or is emancipated by law, this must likewise be recorded in the instruction.

4.3.4 An applicant for legal aid must personally make application for legal aid. If, in exceptional circumstances, it is not possible for such a person to call on a legal aid officer personally, or to submit a completed application himself, a close relative or another responsible person who has personal knowledge of the circumstances may furnish the required particulars and sign the application for legal aid on behalf of the person concerned. A practice of submitting applications through other persons must be avoided.

4.3.5 A single application form for legal aid must be completed. The instruction form must be completed in triplicate. A serial number, for example PTA1/93, PTA2/93, PTA3/93 etc., must be allocated to every application and this number must be entered on all the prescribed documents relating to the case. The Board contemplates the introduction of pre-numbered instructions within the near future. When this is brought into operation the provisions of this paragraph will no longer apply.

If an application is approved, the particulars of the legal practitioner to whom an applicant is referred must be clearly entered on the application form under the heading "Remarks", subsequent to having confirmed by telephone or otherwise that the legal practitioner is prepared to handle the matter. Particulars of the legal practitioner, to whom an applicant has been referred, shall be entered in full on the instruction form together with any vendor number of that legal practitioner (if known).

4.3.7 Legal aid officers must deal with the application and instruction forms as follows:

4.3.7.1 whether or not an application has been granted, the application forms must be filed in numerical order in the office file of the legal aid officer concerned;

4.3.7.2 the original and duplicate copy of the instruction form (LA 2-A and B) shall be handed to the applicant with the request that he should submit them to the legal practitioner concerned without delay;

4.3.7.3 the triplicate copy of the instruction form (LA 2C), documentary proof of income and value of assets, completed means test form and any other relevant information, must be posted to the Head Office of the Board without delay, at the latest on the next business day.

4.3.7.4 The legal aid officer must keep the fourth copy of the instruction form (LA 2D) on file.

4.3.8 Should a legal aid officer become aware, after an instruction has been issued, that the matter is not being proceeded with by the legal practitioner or the applicant, he must recover the instruction forms (LA. 2A and B) and forward them to the Head Office of the Board so that the Head Office file may be closed.

4.3.9 When a legal aid officer has issued an instruction, his function is fulfilled in terms of the administration of the scheme. Legal aid officers may therefore not

4.3.9.1 when instructing attorneys request that merit reports be submitted to them - such reports must be submitted directly to the CEO;

extend legal aid mandates, as this function is vested in the CEO; and

issue instructions in terms of paragraph 4.11 (civil appeals) without the consent of the CEO. An application for legal aid for a civil appeal or any report on the merits of a contemplated civil appeal, must be submitted in writing to the CEO for a decision;

4.4 STAMP DUTY

The Department of Finance has decided that legal aid documents are exempt from stamp duties in terms of provisions of section 4(1)(f) of the Stamp Duty Act, 1968 (Act 77 of 1968). This exemption does not apply to summonses and processes issued by a legal representative.

4.5 CONFIDENTIAL NATURE OF INFORMATION

All information which comes to the notice of an official or representative of the Board must at all times be treated as confidential and may only be disclosed to the legal practitioner concerned acting on instructions of the Board. The privilege of the client must be recognised and applied. By implication, any information given in confidence to the legal aid officer may be conveyed to other officials of the Board and to the legal practitioner appointed, but not to any other person without the CEO's consent or unless a court otherwise orders. It must be recognised that in addition to the privilege enjoyed by the client, legal practitioners also enjoy a right to privacy in respect of any arrangements or agreements between said legal practitioners and the Board.

4.5.2 If another person or body requires information, approval must first be obtained from the CEO before any information is disclosed. Where however the right of a legal aid applicant to receive legal aid or to continue a matter on a legal aid basis is challenged by any other party to the case, a legal administration officer, senior legal administration officer, principal legal administration officer, senior public defender public defender, principal or supervising attorney may, but is not obliged to, disclose such details of the legal aid applicant’s application for legal aid and any merit report received by the Board as are in his/her discretion necessary to permit a proper ventilation of the issue of whether the Board should grant or continue legal aid.

4.5.3 Save as set out above the disclosure of information shall be left to the CEO in his capacity as Information Officer and such Deputy Information Officers as may be appointed by the CEO in terms of the Access to Information Act No 2 of 2000.

4.6 SIGNING OF DOCUMENTS

4.6.1 A representative of the Board shall sign legal aid documents in his capacity as legal aid officer and in the case of legal aid officers in magistrate's offices, shall make use of the office date stamp (Magistrate). Any person other than a legal aid officer shall not sign a legal aid instruction. No person other than an employee of the Board or an employee of the Department of Justice shall be appointed as a legal aid officer.

4.7 REGISTERS, STATISTICS AND RETURNS

Legal aid officers in magistrate's offices must keep an official register with an alphabetical list of all applications under the following headings:
Serial No
Surname and initials
Date of application
Result of application.

4.7.2 Statistics of all applications dealt with and interviews held shall be kept daily on form LA 3. The active time spent on legal aid must be entered daily. Quarterly returns of the totals must be furnished to the CEO promptly at the end of the months of March, June, September and December on form LA 4. No covering letter is required. Nil returns must also be submitted quarterly. In a circular, the CEO will detail new requirements when the Board introduces pre-numbered legal aid instructions.

4.8 STATIONERY, FORMS AND COPIES OF GUIDE

4.8.1 Legal aid officers in magistrate's offices must use the Board's printed forms and departmental letterheads and stationery. Supplies of the Board's forms as well as copies of the Guide must be requisitioned from the CEO timeously. Attorneys may obtain the Guide from the CEO.

4.9 GENERAL PROVISIONS

Without the consent of the CEO, legal aid may not be granted to both the plaintiff/applicant and the defendant/respondent. Where legal aid officers become aware that this has occurred, they must advise the CEO immediately on what grounds each party's application for legal aid has been granted and what steps have been taken to settle the dispute. The CEO must suspend legal aid to both parties pending a decision. Where a legal aid applicant seeks legal aid in respect of a matter in which legal aid has already been granted to an opposing party, the legal aid officer shall ascertain whether the second legal aid applicant qualifies for legal aid and, if so, shall refer the matter to the CEO for a decision, providing all relevant cross references.

The CEO will thereafter decide whether legal aid is to be granted to both parties and, if so on what terms and conditions. Pending such decision, the CEO may elect to suspend legal aid to the first legal aid applicant.

Where more than one legal practitioner represents more than one client in the same matter, each legal practitioner immediately shall give notice to this effect to the CEO and special notice of this aspect shall be indicated prominently in all accounts rendered to the Board. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the CEO exercising discretion to refuse to pay any fees and disbursements incurred after the date on which he/she should reasonably should have been advised. In the event of a failure to advise the CEO that legal aid is being granted to opposing parties in any one matter as a result of the failure of a legal practitioner to comply with his obligations in terms of paragraph 5.2, no fees and disbursements shall be paid to the offending legal practitioner in respect of any legal services rendered or disbursements incurred after the date on which the legal practitioner should reasonably have complied with paragraph 5.2, save with the consent of the CEO.

4.9.3 In all civil and matrimonial matters the legal aid officer should bring the contents of paragraphs 2.4 (contribution towards costs), 5.12 (settlement etc.), 5.19 (Benefit to Board) and 5.12.2 (lump sum payment) to the attention of the applicant and indicate on the instruction form (LA 2C) that this has indeed been done. However, any failure of any legal aid officer to act in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph will not relieve either the legal practitioner concerned or the client of their obligations in terms thereof.

4.9.4 In an application for legal aid for the continuation of a civil or divorce case on legal aid the applicant or his attorney must furnish the Director with a full report covering inter alia the undermentioned aspects, where applicable, before an instruction is issued. This report must be attached to the LA 2B form when sent to head office.

4.9.4.1 The stage to which the proceedings have progressed.

4.9.4.2 What the disputes are.

4.9.4.3 What the quantum is in the case of a dispute primarily related to the defence of a claim sounding in money.

4.9.4.4 What the prospects of success are.

4.9.4.5 Which legal representatives are already involved.

4.9.4.6 Who financed the case up until the application for legal aid was lodged and why that source cannot continue to finance the matter.

4.9.4.7 Whether any settlement proposal has been received, and if so, what the contents are and the reasons why it was not acceptable.

Whether any proposal for a contribution towards costs was made or is available, and if so, what the amount is.

4.9.4.9 Whether any payment into court was made, and if so, what the amount is.

4.9.4.10 Whether any other payment, has been made to the plaintiff. For example by the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner. The lump sum as well as the monthly amount must be furnished.

What experts, welfare officers, Family Advocates or the like, may be still needed or have been employed in the past; copies of their reports must be submitted.

4.9.4.12 The expected costs of the finalisation of the matter.

4.9.4.13 The ability of the other party to settle the claim and or costs.

4.9.4.14 The total expected financial involvement of the Board.

4.9.5 The above-mentioned report of the legal representative must accompany the signed instruction form (LA 2B), if legal aid is granted.

4.9.6 When legal aid is required for the appointment of a curator ad litem/bonis, in all cases the matter must first be referred to the CEO for a decision.

When a curator ad litem/bonis is appointed, the attorney must complete Annexure N and the proposed curator must sign the completed form and return it to the Board.

If an attorney proceeds with the appointment of curator ad litem/bonis without complying with these requirements the CEO reserves the right to refrain from making payment of moneys due in terms of the account to the curator.

At all times the CEO has the discretion to withdraw legal aid previously granted on grounds he or she deems appropriate.

4.10 THE ACQUISITION OF RECORDS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS

4.10.1 The Board will not pay for the acquisition of records in criminal matters in the Magistrate's Courts and will not pay for the acquisition of records in criminal matters for appeal purposes in a High Court or the Supreme Court of Appeal notwithstanding the fact that legal aid may have been authorised in respect of the accused.

4.10.2 Alternative procedures exist for the acquisition of records and are to be found in the relevant court rules:

4.10.2.1 Rule 66(9) of the Magistrate's Court Rules provides that:

"Where a Magistrate or the Court is satisfied that an accused is unable to pay the costs of obtaining a copy of any record or of any transcript thereof or is able to pay only part of such costs, such Magistrate or Court may, at the request of the accused, direct the Clerk of a Court to deliver a copy of such record or transcript to the accused free of charge or at such reduced charge as the Magistrate or Court may determine."

4.10.2.2 Rule 49A of the Uniform Rules provides that:

"In the case of an appeal in terms of Section 315(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act 51 of 1977), to the full Court, the Registrar shall, subject to the provisions of Section 316(5)(b) of the said Act, prepare three additional copies of the case record or parts thereof, as the case may be, and shall furnish the State with the number it requires and, on payment of the prescribed fee, shall furnish the accused with the number he requires: Provided that if the Registrar is of the opinion that the accused is too poor to pay the prescribed fee, such copies may be furnished without payment of any fee, in which case the Registrar's decision shall be final."

4.10.2.3 Rule 52 of the Uniform Rules provides that:

"(1) Whenever -

(a) an accused has been granted leave to appeal in terms of Section 316 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act 51 of 1977); or

(b) an accused has noted an appeal in terms of Section 318 of the aid Act; or

(c) a Court has reserved a question of law arising on the trial of an accused in terms of Section 319 of the said Act –
……

(ii) The accused shall be entitled, on payment of the prescribed fees, to obtain from the Registrar of the Court which tried him such number of copies of the record or parts of the record (as the case may be) as may be necessary for his purpose: Provided that if he is unable by reason of poverty to pay the prescribed fees he shall be entitled to obtain the same without payment of any fees.

(2) Any question arising as to the accused's inability to pay the prescribed fee shall be decided by the Registrar of the Court which tried the accused. The Registrar's decision shall be final."

4.10.3 It follows that where an accused is not entitled as of right to an application for leave to appeal/petition/ appeal as set out in paragraph 3.1.2 but where instructions are authorised by the head office in terms of the Constitution, such instructions should now read:

"1. To consult with the applicant in terms of Section 35(2)(c) of the Constitution; and

2. To apply for the provision of a transcript of the record in terms of Magistrate's Court Rule 66(9)/Uniform Rule 49A/Uniform Rule 52 and to peruse such; and thereafter

3. To report to the CEO on the prospects of success of the contemplated appeal and the anticipated costs thereof ".

4.10.4 Where a legal aid officer is instructed by the head office to issue a legal aid instruction for the prosecution of a criminal appeal, the instruction should read:

"To apply, if necessary, for a transcript of the record in terms of Magistrate's Court Rule 66(9)/Uniform Rule 49A/Uniform Rule 52 and thereafter proceed with an appeal against the conviction and/or sentence imposed by the judgement of the ... court under case number ……….on the…………day of………………20……...….".

4.10.5 Where a legal practitioner is instructed in the Magistrate's Court to act for an applicant in a criminal matter which is part heard and in which the legal practitioner has not at all material times represented the accused, the instruction should read:

"To represent the applicant on charge(s) of... before the ... court under case no……………… from the……………day of………….20…….. applying, if necessary, for the provision of a transcript of the record to date in terms of Magistrate's Court Rule 66(9)."

4.10.6 The irrelevant portions of the above pro forma instructions must be deleted to meet the case in hand and the details omitted must equally be inserted.

4.10.7 While the Board does not pay for the acquisition of records in criminal matters, the Board does pay for the reasonable and necessary costs of acquiring a copy of the docket in a criminal matter. The legal practitioner, who disburses a reasonable amount for the necessary acquisition of a docket in a criminal matter, may recover such amount by including such amount in his/her final account and attaching the relevant voucher to his/her account. Only where the aggregate of disbursements for copies of dockets is likely to exceed R500,00 should the matter be referred to the CEO in advance.

4.11 AID IN CIVIL APPEALS

4.11.1 Subject to the provisions of paragraph 3.3, legal aid is not rendered in a civil appeal unless the CEO is satisfied both that there are reasonable prospects of the appeal succeeding and that the costs of the contemplated appeal will justify the benefit to the legal aid applicant to be served thereby.

4.11.2 An application for assistance to prosecute a civil appeal must be made in the usual manner and should be motivated in an annexure to the application form. The legal aid officer concerned must forward these documents to the CEO for consideration. If available, a copy of the record and/or judgement and the presiding judicial officer's reasons for judgement must accompany the documents. If these documents are not available, an estimate of the costs of acquiring them must be given.

4.11.3 Legal aid officers must notify applicants and attorneys that there will be an unavoidable delay before the CEO's decision can be obtained and that in view of the circumstances they should decide whether to give notice of appeal in the meantime.

4.11.4 The CEO will give reasons for his decision to the applicant or his/her legal representative if requested to do so in writing within three months after the decision was communicated to the legal aid applicant or his/her legal representative.

APPEAL AGAINST REFUSAL OF LEGAL AID

4.12.1 An applicant has the right of appeal to the CEO against the refusal of a legal aid officer to assist him/her and the legal aid officer shall inform him/her of this right. The grounds of appeal must be submitted to the legal aid officer in writing and the legal aid officer must forward these to the CEO together with the application documents and his/her comments.

4.12.2 Where a subordinate of the CEO has taken any decision in the name of the CEO, an applicant has the right of appeal to the CEO personally against a refusal, termination or suspension of legal aid. The grounds of appeal must be submitted to the CEO in writing.

4.12.3 The CEO will give reasons for his/her decision(s) to the applicant or his/her legal representative if requested to do so in writing within three months after the decision was communicated to the legal aid applicant or his/her legal representative.
CHAPTER 5

LEGAL AID AND THE LEGAL PRACTITIONER

5.1 THE LEGAL PRACTITIONER

5.1.1 If, after he/she has been instructed, a legal practitioner or advocate decides not to accept or proceed with the case, he/she must inform the legal aid officer of his/her decision and send a copy of his/her letter in this regard to the applicant. The instruction forms must be returned to the legal aid officer.

5.1.2 If a legal practitioner accepts an instruction, he/she must satisfy himself/ herself that -

5.1.2.1 the instruction form issued to him/her has been duly completed and that the instruction is clear. Without derogating from the generality of the aforegoing, the legal practitioner must ensure when accepting a legal aid instruction that the name, vendor number and address of the legal practitioner set out in the legal aid instruction are correct in every respect. The Boards’ obligation on finalisation of the matter and after consideration of the legal practitioner’s final report and taxation of the legal practitioner’s final account, subject to the other provisions of this Guide, is to pay the legal practitioner corresponding to the vendor number appearing on the legal aid instruction and no other person whatsoever. Legal aid instructions and any rights arising therefrom or from the rending of services pursuant thereto may not be ceded or transferred and legal practitioners are warned that any person purporting to authorise any such cession or transfer at any date after the coming into operation of this Guide is acting ultra vires;

5.1.2.2 he/she is able and qualified to render the required legal service. By accepting the mandate, he/she agrees to act in terms of this Guide.

5.1.3.1 If there is any illegibility, uncertainty or error, the matter must be taken up with the legal aid officer concerned, who must refer it to the CEO, if it cannot be resolved.

5.1.3.2 Where an applicant must contribute, the legal practitioner concerned shall collect the amount before any costs are incurred.

5.1.4 A legal practitioner who accepts an instruction shall deal with the documents handed to him/her by the applicant as follows:

5.1.4.1 The original instruction form must be kept as proof of the Board's instruction to him/her.

5.1.4.2 He/she must accept the instruction by signing the certificate probabilis causa and undertaking on the duplicate instruction form and submitting it to the CEO without delay. By accepting a legal aid instruction, a legal practitioner undertakes to handle the legal aid instruction in accordance with the provisions of the Guide, which provisions become conditions of the contract between the legal practitioner and the Board. It is hereby specifically stipulated that it is a condition of the contract between the legal practitioner and the Board that such only comes into existence at the Board's head office when the LA 2B form signed by the legal practitioner is received by the CEO. However, the legal practitioner's right to charge fees and recover disbursements will thereupon backdate to the date on which the LA 2 forms were issued by the legal aid officer, provided the LA 2B form is received by the CEO within three months of date of issue. If the CEO does not receive the signed LA 2B within three months of date of issue, the offer therein contained will lapse and will not revive or be renewed without the express written consent of the CEO.

5.1.4.3 If the certificate probabilis causa and undertaking cannot be submitted immediately, the instruction must be accepted, the instruction form (LA 2B) amended accordingly, signed and returned. The certificate probabilis causa and undertaking must thereafter be submitted before any further costs are incurred, excluding the costs of investigating the merits of the matter to enable the submission of such certificate. It is important to evaluate the merits of a matter at the earliest possible stage to avoid fruitless litigation. Legal practitioners must therefore attend to this requirement as a matter of urgency. The legal practitioner may, however, take reasonable steps to avoid a default judgement being granted or to prevent prescription taking place provided that the Board reserves the right to decline payment for such steps where the legal practitioner rendered such steps necessary by his/her neglect or oversight. Where such steps are taken the merit report must be submitted to the CEO as a matter of urgency together with a summary of the steps taken and the reasons therefore.

5.1.5 After being instructed, a legal practitioner or advocate must render all assistance himself/herself, and should brief a correspondent and/or advocate only where essential. A legal practitioner may not, without the written consent of the CEO:

5.1.5.1 brief an advocate to render any service he/she by law is capable of rendering and would traditionally render himself/herself. In this context the services which an attorney would "traditionally" render himself/herself are those which he/she was legally permitted to render as an attorney immediately prior to the coming into operation of the Right of Appearance in Courts Act No. 62 of 1995;

5.1.5.2 brief a senior advocate; or

5.1.5.3 prosecute an appeal. (See paragraphs 3.1.2 and 4.11).

5.1.6 The choice of a correspondent and/or advocate rests with the legal practitioner concerned, provided that the legal practitioner may not instruct a correspondent or advocate who is himself/herself/themselves/itself excluded from receiving legal aid instructions and provided further that no advocate shall be instructed who is not a member of a professional association recognised by the Board as exercising effective disciplinary control over its members. (For this purpose, the Board recognises the General Council of the Bar of South Africa and its constituent bars, the Criminal Law Bar of South Africa and the Association of Independent Advocates of South Africa). A correspondent or an advocate so briefed must be prepared to render his/her services at legal aid tariff and subject to the provisions contained herein. He/she must be advised in advance in writing that the matter is a legal aid matter.

5.1.7 If a legal practitioner or advocate acting in a legal aid matter has reason to believe that -

5.1.7.1 the applicant's problem is trivial or a matter arising from vexatiousness; or

5.1.7.2 the circumstances are such that no real or substantial benefit will be attained by the rendering of legal aid, or

5.1.7.3 the legal costs involved would be out of proportion to the relief sought; or

generally, considering all the circumstances of the matter, legal aid should not have been granted for financial or other reasons;

the legal practitioner must refuse to proceed and the legal practitioner must inform the CEO accordingly.

5.1.8 Before a legal practitioner and/or advocate enters into or continues with litigation on a legal aid basis, he must satisfy himself that the client in a civil case has reasonable prospects of success.

5.1.9 A legal practitioner who has been briefed must not render assistance beyond the scope of his instruction and must not make applications (including Rule 43 applications) or institute actions which are additional to or beyond the main instruction without the written consent of the CEO. Legal aid beyond the initial scope of the instruction must be approved in advance by the CEO. Telephonic authorisation may be obtained for the proposed action in urgent circumstances but the obligation rests on the legal practitioner to confirm such authorisation in writing. Only then will the attainment of authorisation be deemed to be completed.

5.2 NOTICE THAT LEGAL AID IS BEING RENDERED

5.2.1 In civil matters, the legal practitioner must, on behalf of the Board, inform the opposing party and the registrar/clerk of the court in writing, in accordance with the provisions of section 8A of the Act, that aid is being rendered to the litigant by the Board and forward a copy of the notice to the CEO. The legal practitioner must also indicate on all pleadings that he represents a legal aid litigant. Failure to do this deprives the Board of its ability to recover costs in terms of the award, which are ceded to it in its own name, and may lead to severe losses on the part of the Board. It may also result in the legal practitioners appointed not receiving full payment of their fees. In a criminal matter, during the first appearance of the accused in court on legal aid, the legal practitioner/advocate must hand in a similar notice to court that the accused has received legal aid, provide the public prosecutor with a copy and forward a copy to the CEO. The Board shall be entitled, but not obliged, to suspend any payment to the legal practitioner concerned pending proof that this paragraph has been complied with. In both civil and criminal matters, the requisite notice must specify the legal aid instruction number to enable interested parties receiving such notice to correspond with the Board.

5.2.2 Should it come to the notice of a legal practitioner who has been instructed that the opposing party is also acting on legal aid, no further proceedings in the matter should be taken and he/she must notify the CEO immediately and furnish him/her with particulars. The CEO will decide whether and if so how legal aid shall be provided for the further prosecution of the matter.

5.3 REFERENCE IN CORRESPONDENCE

5.3.1 The applicant's surname and full names as they appear on the instruction form, the reference number of the legal aid officer and the reference number of the Board's head office, if known, must always be mentioned in correspondence. To merely refer to a matter as "Smit vs Smit' or to the minor on whose behalf the action is instituted, makes it impossible to trace the file and deal with any issue relating to it. When an account is rendered for payment, a copy of the instruction must accompany that account.

5.4 CORRESPONDENCE AND POSTAL MATTERS

5.4.1 Except where otherwise indicated in this Guide, a legal aid officer's task is completed after he/she has referred the applicant to a legal practitioner. Any other matter or problem, which the legal practitioner may experience thereafter which he/she cannot solve by reference to the provisions of this Guide, must be taken up with the CEO. In the same way, any queries or other issues related to the client must be reported directly to the CEO.

5.4.2 Documents must not be mailed by registered or certified post. Care must be taken that sufficient postage is affixed.

5.5 COPIES OF RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS

5.5.1 If copies of documents other than a record, or if in a civil matter a record, are essential to carry out the instructions of the Board, the instructed legal practitioner must obtain consent from the CEO to obtain such an item before he/she can recover the costs from the Board. When applying for consent a quotation relating to costs must be submitted. In the event of the cost of any such copies exceeding R100 in any one matter the consent of the CEO must be obtained in advance.

5.6 SUBSTITUTED SERVICE AND EDICTAL CITATION

5.6.1 If necessary, a legal practitioner who has been instructed may proceed by way of substituted service or edictal citation with the prior consent of the CEO.

5.6.2 By agreement with the Board, the Press Union of South Africa has recommended to its members that they publish advertisements in legal aid cases at a reduced tariff (welfare tariff). When applying for consent an estimate of the cost involved must be submitted. When an advertisement is submitted, it must be accompanied by a certificate from the legal practitioner concerned to the effect that it is a matter where the Board is rendering assistance to an indigent person as well as by a copy of the instruction form (LA 2A). A copy of the certificate must accompany the account for payment.

5.7 MEDICO-LEGAL SERVICES AND OTHER EXPERT WITNESSES

5.7.1 If the services of medical practitioners or other expert witnesses are required, a legal practitioner may obtain these with the prior consent of the CEO. In order to enable the CEO to consider the application, an estimate of the costs must accompany the application. Annexure J must be completed for this purpose. If more than one quotation for an expert cannot be obtained, or if only two quotations are obtainable, the reasons for furnishing only one or two quotations must be submitted.

5.7.2 The Medical Association of South Africa has recommended to its members that services in legal aid cases should be rendered at seventy five percent (75%) of the customary fees. This recommendation is contained in the minutes of a meeting held by the Federal Council of the Medical Association in May 1986. Whenever the services of medical practitioners are called upon in a legal aid case, the fact that the litigant is an indigent person assisted by the Board must be brought to the attention of the medical practitioner concerned. The medical practitioner's attention must be drawn to the recommendation of the Medical Association and a copy of the instruction form (LA 2-A) must accompany such notice. A copy of the aforementioned notice must accompany the account for payment.

5.7.3 The Board does not pay costs related to the medical treatment, operations or hospitalisation of the applicant, nor travelling costs for visiting medical practitioners, or the costs of client attending court. The Board renders and makes available legal services not financial aid.

5.8 TRACING AGENTS AND OTHER CONSUL-TANTS

5.8.1 The Board is not obliged to settle the expenses of tracing agents, investigators, claim consultants or persons who render services of a similar nature, unless such services and the maximum costs attached thereto have previously been approved in writing by the CEO.

5.9 WITHDRAWAL

Subject to paragraph 3.1.5.2, a legal practitioner acting in a legal aid matter may withdraw under the same circumstances under which he/she normally could have withdrawn, had it not been a legal aid matter. Such a withdrawal can result in considerable additional costs for the Board, owing to the fact that fresh instructions may have to be given to another legal practitioner. Thus, before a legal practitioner withdraws, the matter must be considered very thoroughly and the CEO must, where possible, be informed of the circumstances beforehand and must authorise any second or subsequent legal aid instruction before such is issued. A legal practitioner who contemplates withdrawing from a matter as a result of some avoidable act or omission on the part of the client must draw to the attention of the client the possible consequences of such act and wherever possible afford the client a reasonable opportunity to cure such act or omission. The legal practitioner must also explicitly draw to the attention of the client that he/she will not be entitled to appointment of a second or subsequent legal aid, legal practitioner as of right.

5.10 PROGRESS REPORTS

5.10.1 Except in simple matters and those that are resolved within three months of the instruction, the legal practitioner instructed shall advise the CEO on a four-monthly basis regarding the circumstances of the matter and its progress. Any information relevant to the disposal of the matter, its complexities, financial implications, settlement, limitation of proceedings or the like must be transmitted to the CEO whenever they arise.

5.10.2 A file is opened at the head office of the Board in respect of each judicare case in which legal aid is rendered and these files must from time to time be closed and destroyed. As soon as the necessary legal aid has been rendered to a person, or a matter becomes stale or for some other reason is disposed of, this fact must be reported to the CEO so that the matter may be finalised in accordance with the provisions of the Board.

5.10.3 If a legal practitioner who has been instructed on behalf of the Board does not submit a final account within six months from date of instruction or report four-monthly on the progress, he/she may be requested in writing to do so within twenty-one days. If a legal practitioner remains in default of compliance with such a request, the Board's file will be closed. It will be accepted, without waiver of any rights of the Board, that no moneys are owed to the legal practitioner.

5.10.4 At the end of any matter or when any interim order is granted the legal practitioner must submit a full report to the Board indicating the outcome of the matter or order and where appropriate, all issues relating to costs and the possibility of recovering costs and or enforcing an order.

5.10.5 In the event of the CEO entering into any arrangement with any legal practitioner in terms of which the practitioner is entitled to account to the Board monthly or at any other regular interval on account of the anticipated length and/or duration of the matter or for any other reason the legal practitioner shall provide a progress report in respect of the matter simultaneously with the rendering of each account.

5.11 POSSIBLE ABUSES AND INCURRING OF COSTS

5.11.1 It is important to ensure that as far as possible legal representation is offered to the indigent litigant. It is just as important that the principles and rules of this Guide are enforced so as to enable as many persons as possible to receive legal aid and to ensure that the system of legal aid and the Board are not brought into disrepute as a result of the conduct of legal practitioners contrary to the letter and spirit of this Guide. For these reasons, the Board reserves the right to terminate mandates to legal practitioners already in possession of instructions or to cease further mandates where these principles are disregarded or abused. In addition, the Board in appropriate instances may initiate disciplinary procedures with the relevant authorities. The Board also reserves the right to circulate to its various offices the names of legal practitioners disqualified from receiving instructions and to withhold payment of any moneys due to the legal practitioner in excess of reasonable fees and expenses.

5.11.2 Any person who is a party to any matter before any court in which any other party is receiving legal aid shall be entitled to complain to the CEO if he/she believes that he/she is personally able to depose to facts and/or produce documents and/or affidavits by other persons indicating or tending to indicate that the legal aid applicant does not or no longer qualifies for legal aid or in the event of a civil matter that the legal aid applicant lacks a reasonable prospect of success. All such complaints shall be on affidavit supported, if appropriate, by documents. The CEO shall ignore all anonymous complaints and shall invite all oral complainants to reduce their complaints to writing and to depose thereto. In the event of any complainant being illiterate the CEO shall make reasonable arrangements to assist the complainant in reducing his/her complaint to the form of an affidavit. On the receipt of any such complaint on affidavit, the CEO shall write to the legal practitioner representing the legal aid applicant providing a copy of the complaint received and affording the legal aid applicant a reasonable opportunity to reply thereto. On receipt of the legal aid applicant's reply, or after a reasonable time, if no reply is received, and after conducting such further investigations as are necessary, in the opinion of the CEO, the CEO shall decide whether legal aid is to be continued and shall advise the legal practitioner representing the legal aid applicant accordingly. In the consideration of any such complaint, the complainant shall bear the onus of proving on balance of probabilities that legal aid should be withdrawn. If the question to be considered is whether legal aid should be continued the CEO may, pending the finalisation of any investigation, elect to suspend legal aid if he/she is of the view that the complainant has a prima facie case for the withdrawal of legal aid. If the question to be considered is whether the mandate of a particular legal practitioner in a particular matter should be terminated or whether a particular legal practitioner should receive and/or be permitted to continue acting in respect of legal aid instructions at all the legal practitioner concerned shall bear the onus of proving on a balance of probabilities that he/she should continue with the matter, continue to receive legal aid instructions or continue with the conduct of legal aid instructions already accepted, as the case may be. No legal practitioner has a right to either receive or continue with any legal aid instruction in particular or legal aid instructions in general and the Board’s only obligation in the event of the terminating any legal aid instructions validly accepted shall be to pay the legal practitioner the fees and disbursements to which he/she is entitled in terms of this Guide within 30 days of the said legal practitioner having reported and accounted to the Board.

5.11.3 During the handling of legal aid matters, legal practitioners and advocates must at all times be on their guard against abuse of the Board's services by the legal aid applicant (from the commencement to the finalisation of a case). A considerable period may elapse from the commencement, and the applicant’s circumstances may change considerably during this time. Changes, which may affect the qualifications of a client for the continuation of legal aid, must be reported immediately to the CEO.

5.11.4 During subsequent interviews, the legal practitioner must establish from a client whether he/she continues to qualify for legal aid according to the means test. If he/she ceases to do so, the matter may not be proceeded with on a legal aid basis without the CEO's written consent. Any irregular obtaining or use of the Board's services, which may become known, must also be reported immediately.

5.11.5 The Board is financed, inter alia, from public funds and it is in the public interest that legal costs be kept as low as possible. Legal aid clients whose actions lead to unnecessary costs must be discouraged from doing so and problems in this regard must be brought to the CEO's attention immediately. (See subparagraph 5.12.3). No unnecessary costs will be permitted.

5.11.6 It is important to note that once legal aid has been granted to a client in a civil matter the costs aspect of the matter changes. The interest in costs is ceded to the Board together with a percentage of the proceeds of the action as determined by the Board from time to time - the Benefit. The client therefore has no further interest in the costs issue. The Board in terms of this Guide pays the attorney. The Board's interests must therefore continue to be considered and protected and the legal practitioners involved must see to the despatch and finalisation of the matter and ensure that proper consideration is given to the interests of the Board. Any attempt to bring the matter to finality, which has a direct or indirect impact on the Board's right to recover costs, must be referred to the CEO for prior consent before conclusion. An order or agreement that each party will pay its own costs, for example, must not be proposed, put forward or accepted without the consent of the CEO. An agreement that a party will pay his costs to the date legal aid was granted and thereafter each party will pay its own costs, is likewise unacceptable. Any action on the part of any legal practitioner acting in the matter, which would unnecessarily increase any legal costs without good cause, must be avoided. The Board reserves the right to refuse payment of any costs or charges occasioned in this manner.

5.11.7 If a matter is settled for a lump sum inclusive of costs or for a capital sum with a contribution towards costs the Board will interpret this and apply it so that the party and party taxed bill will be deemed to be included in this sum. The consequence is that these costs will have to be paid to the Board out of the proceeds together with the Benefit, on the balance referred to in paragraph 5.19. It is the duty of the legal practitioner to inform the client of this situation and to ensure that these sums are paid over to the Board.

5.11.8 The Board reserves the right to withhold settling any outstanding accounts due to legal practitioners until the provisions of paragraphs 5.11.6 and 5.11.7 have been complied with or any dispute resolved.

5.11.9 The CEO may, should the circumstances warrant such, seek confirmation from the presiding officer that the client was satisfactorily represented or that proper appearances in court took place and that no unnecessary postponements were obtained by the legal practitioner.

5.12 TENDERS, SETTLEMENTS AND PAYMENTS INTO COURT

5.12.1 A legal practitioner instructed in a civil or divorce matter may at his/her discretion negotiate a settlement and may also, with the consent of the CEO, waive a claim for costs or contribution towards costs. The provisions of paragraph 5.11 must however be complied with. If the CEO grants such authority telephonically, the legal practitioner must confirm the circumstances and the authority in writing. The rule in practice in litigation, namely "costs follow the unsuccessful party" must be borne in mind throughout.

5.12.2 Settlements for an all-inclusive amount (including costs) must be avoided as far as possible. Where this is not possible, the legal practitioner must inform the legal aid litigant that the costs to which the Board is entitled in terms of section 8A of the Act or otherwise were included in the lump sum and will be paid to the Board out of this sum. A party and party bill of costs must be drawn in order to determine the amount to which the Board is entitled and which will be deemed to be included in the lump sum.

5.12.3 If a legal aid litigant unreasonably refuses to accept a fair offer of settlement or insists on an exorbitant or unreasonable claim, the matter must be brought to the attention of the CEO who may terminate further legal aid in the matter. Such decision must not prejudice the client or the enforcement of claims for costs. The CEO shall however at all times during proceedings be entitled mero motu to consider possible settlement and if he/she is of the view that the client is acting in an unreasonable way, contrary to his/her approach, he/she can terminate or suspend further legal aid.

5.12.4 If a payment into court or an offer of settlement or a tender is made, the legal practitioner must immediately notify the CEO in writing and also furnish him/her with a full report on the merits of the matter and the issues relating to the tender/offer of settlement/payment into court. If legal aid is granted for a continuation of an action and a tender/offer of settlement/payment into court has already been made, the above mentioned provisions will apply mutatis mutandis.

5.13 BASIS OF REMUNERATION OF LEGAL PRACTITIONERS

5.13.1 The attorney accepting an instruction in a civil matter, and the attorney or advocate accepting an instruction in a criminal matter accept such instruction subject to the terms of this Guide and/or any directives made pursuant to it and subject specifically, without derogating from the generality of the aforegoing, to the Board's right to tax any fees list, account invoice or bill of costs rendered by such legal practitioner and its further right to delegate the taxation thereof to a person or persons of its choice and to check and revise such taxation. Such terms and conditions shall thereafter apply to all actions pursuant to the instruction and to settlement of any moneys due by the Board.

5.13.2 As soon as a civil and/or divorce matter has been finalised, whether by settlement, judgement by a court or otherwise, the legal practitioner must inform the CEO of any benefit obtained for an applicant and at the same time notify him/her of any costs recovered, or recoverable, in that matter. In the event of a criminal case the CEO shall also be informed of the outcome with all the other statistical information required by the Board from time to time. The legal practitioner submitting an account to the Board shall, save in respect of interim accounts for disbursements, account to the Board fully for all services rendered and all disbursement incurred and, where required, the disbursements shall be verified by original vouchers submitted to the Board simultaneously with the account of the legal practitioner. The Board is not obliged to consider for payment, claims for VAT or fees or disbursements or vouchers in respect thereof submitted by any person separately and/or after the legal practitioner instructed by the Board has first submitted his/her final account. Save where specific provision for the payment of interim fees and/or disbursements is made in this Guide each legal practitioner instructed by the Board shall only be entitled to account to the Board once only in respect of any particular legal aid matter. This shall not preclude reasonable reminders in respect of overdue accounts by the legal practitioner instructed by the Board but legal practitioners are required to refrain from subsequently submitting copies of accounts save when specifically requested to do so.

5.13.3 Subject to the provisions of subparagraphs 5.13.7, 5.13.8 and 5.13.9 a legal practitioner instructed shall be remunerated in accordance with the tariffs of fees contained in Annexures E.1, E.2, E.3, E.4, F.1, F.2, F.3, F.4 and F.5. No additional moneys may be received directly or indirectly by him/her from the client or from any other source in respect of the period after the inception of legal aid. In this context, "received" shall include monies deposited to a trust account. Such conduct constitutes unethical conduct on the part of the legal practitioner and may be referred to the appropriate Law Society for investigation.

5.13.4 If costs are awarded in the matter, the terms of section 8A of the Act apply and if it appears that such costs can be recovered or can be readily paid by the opposing party, a party and party bill of costs must be drawn and taxed, except where otherwise indicated, and the taxed amount must be recovered from the opposing side by the legal practitioner. The full advocate's fees and disbursements must be included in the bill of costs and not merely the amount due by the Board.

5.13.5 Whenever any costs or benefits are recoverable, the legal practitioner shall advise the CEO to obtain instructions, if necessary, for execution of the order. The legal practitioner however shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to protect the financial interests of the Board. A legal practitioner who recovers the costs can deal with them in one of the following ways:

5.13.5.1 He/she may recover his fees and disbursements from the costs, if any, recovered from the other party and pay over the balance recovered to the Board together with the bill taxed against the other party and his/her own account in accordance with the current legal aid tariff.

5.13.5.2 He/she may submit an attorney and client bill of costs in accordance with the current legal aid tariff to the Board and set off the amount of legal costs, if recovered, in full. (The provisions of sub-paragraph 5.13.6 must be considered). No additional fees may be received or retained by the legal practitioner. The legal practitioner instructed at the same time shall furnish the Board with the appropriate taxed bill of costs or a photocopy thereof.

5.13.6 If the briefing of an advocate has been authorised by the CEO the advocate must furnish his/her account to the legal practitioner who must submit the advocate's account with his/her account to the Board so that all the bills may be dealt with simultaneously. It is not possible to finalise one bill in isolation. Attorneys must inform the instructed advocate of this. (See also paragraph 5.13.13).

5.13.7 When legal costs are not recovered or are not recoverable or where the amount recovered is not sufficient to cover the legal costs and the Benefit to the Board, the legal costs or the balance thereof including disbursements and the Benefit as the case may be, must be recovered from the financial benefit received by the client. The amount of legal costs and the Benefit to the Board to be recovered from the financial benefit may not exceed 50% of the financial benefit to the client. Annexure H.1 and H.2 may be consulted for examples of the necessary calculations. For the convenience of legal practitioners obliged to account in respect of legal aid instructions issued prior to 1st November 1999, Annexure H.1 and H.2 hereto illustrate the calculations appropriate in respect of matters finalised on or before 31 October 1999. The calculations in respect of matters finalised after that date, particularly matters commenced and finalised after 1st November 1999, are very much simpler.

5.13.8 Where a settlement has been negotiated (see paragraph 5.12) and it is a provision of the settlement that the litigant will be awarded his/her party and party costs without taxation, or in place thereof a lump sum with or without a contribution to costs, the provisions of subparagraphs 5.11.5, 5.13.5 and 5.13.6 shall apply mutatis mutandis, and when accounting, the CEO must be provided with a copy of the agreement.

5.13.9 The legal practitioner must not, without the authority of the CEO, permit the payment of more than 50% of the financial benefit to client until clarity has been achieved on the recoverability of the costs awarded. It may be necessary to retain part of the award to cover part of his/her costs or disbursements or the Benefit to the Board out of the financial benefit of the client. The Board will settle any costs due to him/her. The legal practitioner must ensure that all amounts due to the Board as costs or Benefit are recovered and paid over to the Board.

5.13.10 The traditional relationship between the legal practitioner and advocate continues to exist when legal aid has been granted except where in criminal matters the advocate receives a direct instruction.

5.13.11 Advocates doing legal aid work, like attorneys, are remunerated in accordance with annexures E.1, E.2, E.3, E.4, F.1, F.2, F.3, F.4 and F.5.

5.13.12 The Board reserves the right to make representations to the relevant bar association on any aspect relating to advocates' fees or particular items of fees or to bring to the attention of any member of the bar any information which may be relevant or essential in determining fees.

5.13.13 An attorney instructed by the Board may not, without the approval of the CEO, brief counsel to do the work which he/she was instructed to do.

5.13.14 In cases where an advocate is instructed the legal practitioner must ensure that the advocate's account is submitted to the Board, together with his/her own account so that a proper evaluation of both accounts and the total costs of the case can take place. (See also paragraph 5.13.6)

5.13.15 The legal practitioner must furthermore ensure that the advocate's account is in accordance with the prescribed tariff.

5.14 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE LEGAL PRACTITIONER’S SUB-CONTRACTORS

5.14.1 The legal practitioner who instructs a subcontractor, whether with or without the consent of the CEO, acts as a principal and not as the agent of the Board.

5.14.2 Where in a legal aid matter a legal practitioner instructs an advocate, a correspondent, a sheriff, an expert or any other subcontractor, whether with or without the consent of the CEO, no contractual nexus thereby comes into being between the Board and the said subcontractor.

5.14.3 While the CEO is entitled to authorise payment to a subcontractor directly, such authority is rarely given and then only when the CEO is satisfied that the legal practitioner concerned has not paid the subcontractor concerned and that it would be in the interests of the Board so to act.

5.14.4 The Board pays the legal practitioner with whom it has contracted or that legal practitioner’s executor, trustee or liquidator as the case may be. Save as previously mentioned, the Board is only obliged to pay any person other than the legal practitioner with whom it contracted pursuant to an order of a competent count.

5.14.5 Attorneys who dissolve partnership and/or change the name under which they practise should take care to ensure that before the partnership is dissolved or the name is changed, as the case may, the partnership/ practise gives written consent to the CEO, signed by the individual practitioner required to carry out the instruction, as to the person to be paid in respect of fees and disbursements prior to date of dissolution/ change of name. The CEO will elect whether to pay the legal practitioner/practise originally instructed or whether to pay the person designated by the legal practitioner concerned. Any consent by the CEO to pay a legal practitioner/practice other than that originally instructed shall operate only in respect of fees and disbursements acquired prior to dissolution/change of name. A new instruction must be sought and obtained in respect of the continuation of the matter on a legal aid basis after dissolution/change of name.

5.15 CESSION OF COSTS


5.15.1 Section 8A of the Act provides that when costs become payable to the litigant in a lawsuit in respect of which legal aid is rendered to the litigant, the litigant concerned is deemed to have ceded his/her rights to those costs to the Board.

5.15.2 A legal representative who has been instructed in a civil or divorce matter, may during the hearing, with the prior consent of the CEO, waive a claim for costs if the other party is unable to pay the costs or make a contribution towards costs or to make another agreement relating to costs. The CEO must be fully informed of all relevant information and if he/she grants authority telephonically, the legal practitioner shall confirm all the circumstances in writing with the CEO forthwith.

5.16 RECOVERY OF COSTS

5.16.1 The CEO may give instructions that attempts be made to recover costs to which the Board may be entitled. (See paragraphs 5.12 and 5.13). If the necessary requirements have been complied with, the costs must be recovered in the Board's name. (See section 8A (1), (2) and (3) of the Act).

5.16.2 A legal practitioner who recovers costs in the Board's name, may in his/her discretion accept reasonable instalments and pay these over when a reasonable amount is available. The legal practitioner must submit reports to the Board at not more than six monthly intervals.

5.16.3 The legal practitioner without prior consent from the CEO may initiate no Section 65 steps.

5.17 DISBURSEMENTS

5.17.1 Disbursements amounting to not less than R500,00 in any one matter may be claimed periodically from the Board before the finalisation of a case. Accounts in this regard cause a considerable amount of extra work in the Board's head office and should only be submitted if the disbursements are an excessive burden for the legal practitioner.

5.17.2 The payment of any interim fees or disbursement will not be construed to constitute an admission by the Board that such amount was indeed payable and the Board reserves the right to deduct any overpayment or any payment made in error at the final accounting and reconciliation stage.

5.18 LEGAL PRACTITIONER'S ACCOUNTS

5.18.1 An account as described in paragraphs 5.13.3 and 5.13.5 must be itemised and dated and where a fee is calculated on a time basis or per folio, the time and number of folios must be stipulated.

5.18.2 All accounts, including interim accounts, must be submitted in triplicate.

5.18.3 Where a legal practitioner who has been instructed has briefed a correspondent, or an advocate, or made use of the services of an expert witness, he/she must indicate in his/her account the amounts owing to such a person and attach such person's account in triplicate to his own as a voucher. The legal practitioner who has been instructed must ensure that the correspondent's account has been duly specified and dated and that the items claimed correspond with the prescribed tariff.

5.18.4 If a legal practitioner's account is in order, the Board will pay the legal practitioner who has been instructed and he/she in turn must pay the correspondent or advocate or witnesses, if any. The Board shall pay the advocate his/her fees directly where the Board has given a direct instruction to the advocate. The Board in its discretion may pay the advocate directly, in respect of provisional payments during litigation proceedings. The Board will only settle other accounts of advocates as provided in paragraph 5.13.6 save where the CEO authorises the direct payment of any advocate.

5.18.4.1 No compensation will be paid for negotiations with the Board for legal aid to a client, related consultations with the client with the aim of rendering legal aid, correspondence with the legal aid officer or the Board's head office or CEO, perusing documents or making or receiving telephone calls in this connection or fees and/or disbursements incidental to the aforegoing.

5.18.4.2 No compensation will be paid for any negotiations towards establishing the legal practitioner's willingness to accept a particular case or for perusing the Board's instruction(s).

5.18.4.3 The Board will only accept liability for costs incurred as from the date of the Board's instruction, as indicated on the instruction form (LA 2), and not from the date of negotiation with the client or the legal aid officer for the rendering of legal aid. In exceptional cases the CEO, however, may authorise payment of legal costs incurred before date of instruction.

5.18.4.4 The date on which any action was taken must be indicated against the account item concerned.

5.18.4.5 Where an all-inclusive fee for an item is allowed in the tariff, (for example in respect of letters and telephone calls) no allowance will be made for disbursements.

5.18.4.6 Where legal aid is granted to more than one litigant in any one matter by the instruction of any one legal practitioner/ practice no additional fees shall be allowed save as provided in Annexure E.2.

5.18.4.7 The Board does not accept liability for the travelling or subsistence expenses of anyone to whom aid is rendered by the Board. Reasonable travelling expenses, the loss of wages and accommodation of a necessary witness (other than the legal aid litigant himself/herself) in a civil case, however, may be claimed.

5.18.4.8 The Board does not accept liability for the costs involved in tracing witnesses or opposing parties unless with the prior approval of the CEO.

5.18.4.9 The Board does not accept liability for any costs or any other amounts awarded against an unsuccessful legal aid litigant on any grounds whatsoever, during the course of proceedings. The legal aid officer and the legal practitioner appointed by the Board must convey this information to the client.

5.18.4.10 No fees other than those laid down in the tariffs will be allowed. The CEO, however, does have the discretion to permit payment of limited increased fees in very exceptional cases. Full details must be submitted to the CEO when seeking this benefit. This authority shall be exercised by the CEO personally and shall not be delegated to any subordinate although the CEO shall be entitled to be advised in relation thereto by his/her subordinates.

5.18.5 If a legal practitioner's account is correct, the Board will, after taxation, checking and authorisation thereof, pay the legal practitioner to whom instruction was given and the legal practitioner must pay the correspondent, advocate and witnesses, if necessary. Neither the legal practitioner nor his/her subcontractors will receive notice of the taxation of their accounts nor will they be entitled to be present thereat. However:

5.18.5.1 A legal practitioner is entitled to submit to the Board with his/her account any written representations he/she may wish to make to the CEO in relation to the taxation of his/her account and/or the taxation of the account of his/her subcontractor(s).

5.18.5.2 Every account taxed by a servant and/or agent of the Board is checked by at least one other person.

5.18.5.3 Legal practitioners who are not satisfied with the taxation of their accounts are entitled to follow to procedure set out in paragraph 5.18.7 below.

5.18.6 Mistakes in a legal practitioner's account or items not allowed will be recorded either on the duplicate of the account or on a separate invoice/tax invoice and the duplicate of the account/tax invoice together with the Board's cheque will be forwarded to the legal practitioner by the Board.

5.18.7 If any dispute sounding in money arises after date of implementation of the Guide between the Board and any legal practitioner concerning the non payment of fees and/or disbursements and/or the under payment of fees and/or disbursements and/or the erroneous payment of fees and/or disbursements and/or the partial over payment of fees and/or disbursements and/or the misrepresentation and consequent over payment of any fees and/or disbursements to which any legal practitioner is entitled, then and in that event if efforts to resolve any dispute by negotiation have failed, then either party:

5.18.7.1 May declare a dispute within 30 days of such dispute arising, or within 30 days of the issue in dispute having come to the knowledge of the aggrieved party, by delivering the details of the dispute to the defaulting party within 30 days after declaring the dispute, and;

5.18.7.2 May request that the dispute be referred by the parties, with legal representation, to arbitration by a single arbitrator at a place and time determined by him/her.

5.18.7.3 Such arbitration shall be conducted in the province where the legal practitioner practices and at Pretoria or Johannesburg or Pietersburg or Witbank or Potchefstroom or Cape Town or Port Elizabeth or Kimberley or Bloemfontein or Durban. A single arbitrator shall conduct such arbitration at the Board’s office in the abovementioned city (in respect of the use of which no charge shall be levied) and shall be:

5.18.7.3.1 Selected by mutual agreement between the parties, or failing such agreement;

5.18.7.3.2 Nominated on the application of either party by the chairperson for the time being of the Association of Arbitrators.

5.18.7.4 At all times, every reasonable effort shall be made to ensure that such arbitrator has the necessary technical skills to enable him/her to adjudicate the dispute in a satisfactory manner.

5.18.7.5 The award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the parties, who hereby agree to give effect to the award. If the amount awarded by the arbitrator in any arbitration proceedings contemplated in terms of this paragraph 5.18.7:

5.18.7.5.1 is equal to or exceeds the amount last claimed by the claimant as at the date when the time, place and venue of the arbitration was communicated to all parties for the first time, costs of the arbitration, including the costs of the arbitrator, shall be warded against the defendant;

5.18.7.5.2 is equal to or less than the aggregate of the amounts paid on account and offered, whether with or without prejudice and whether on account or in full and final settlement, by the defendant as at the date when the time, place and venue of the arbitration was communicated to all parties for the first time, costs of the arbitration, including the costs of the arbitrator, shall be awarded against the claimant;

5.18.7.5.3 is less than the amount so claimed by the claimant, but exceeds the aggregate of the amounts so paid on account and offered by the defendant, so much of the costs of the claimant shall be awarded against the defendant as bears to such costs the same proportion as the difference between the amount so awarded and the aggregate of the amounts so paid on account and offered, bears to the difference between the amount so awarded and the amount so claimed.

The provisions of this paragraph 5.18.7.5 above shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claimant in reconvention and a defendant in reconvention.

The arbitrator shall have a discretion to deviate from paragraphs 5.18.7.5.1, 5.18.7.5.2 and 5.18.7.5.3 above where in his opinion the conduct of the claimant was either vexatious or pettifogging in that the quantum of the costs exceed the amount in dispute.

The arbitrator will, when making an award of costs, specify the particular amount to be paid to him/her by each party and the tariff on which any costs payable to any other party is to be calculated. The arbitrator will also either himself/herself tax any bill of costs in respect of an arbitration of if there is a dispute as to the correct quantum thereof or will specify a willing and able person to undertake such taxation.

5.18.7.6 Either party shall be entitled to have the arbitrator’s award made an order of court at the cost of the party requesting it.

5.18.7.7 The arbitration shall be held in accordance with procedures to be determined by the arbitrator. The arbitration shall be conducted in an informal and summary manner and shall be held as quickly as possible with a view to it being completed within 90 days of the appointment of the arbitrator.

5.18.7.8 In the event of a dispute, both parties shall proceed to perform in accordance with their contractual obligations with due diligence pending resolution of the dispute, subject to the provision of paragraph 5.18.9 below.

5.18.7.9 This paragraph 15.8.7 is severable from the rest of the contract between the Board and the legal practitioner and shall remain in effect if the contract is terminated.

5.18.7.10 Unless and until the arbitration provided for by this paragraph 15.8.7 has been held and determined, both the Board and the legal practitioner shall be barred from instituting any civil legal proceedings sounding in money against one another in any court in respect of the non payment of any fees and/or disbursements and/or the under payment of fees and/or disbursements and/or the partial over payment of fees and/or disbursements and/or the erroneous over payment of fees and/or disbursements and/or the misrepresentation and consequent over payment of any fees and/or disbursements to which the legal practitioner is entitled.

5.18.8 Pending finalisation of any dispute relating to account items referred to in paragraph 5.18.7 or any ethical or disciplinary matter pursuant to such dispute, the Board shall be entitled to withhold payment of all and any moneys due to such legal practitioner.

5.18.9 Save as set out in paragraph 5.18.10 below, no fees and disbursements shall be payable by the Board to a legal practitioner unless and until:

5.18.9.1 The matter has been finalised; and

5.18.9.2 Any reports on the outcome of the matter, as required by the Guide, have been submitted to the Director, and

5.18.9.3 An account drawn in accordance with the requirements of the Guide has been submitted to the CEO, and

5.18.9.4 All requisite documents and vouchers have been received by the Board; and

5.18.9.5 The Board has been afforded 30 calendar days, to tax, check, approve and process payment to the legal practitioner concerned.

5.18.10 Subject to the submission of any report required and paragraphs 5.18.9.3 to 5.18.9.5 above, fees and disbursement may be claimed by a legal practitioner prior to the finalisation of a matter if:

5.18.10.1 paragraph 5.17.1 is applicable, or

5.18.10.2 the CEO, in the exercise of his discretion, has granted his/her consent to the payment of an advance in respect of anticipated disbursements exceeding R500,00 relating to anticipated expenditure other than in respect of the fees of any person; or

5.18.10.3 the CEO, in the exercise of his/her discretion, has granted his/her consent to the payment of interim fees and disbursements on account of the anticipated duration of the matter and/or the extent to which such will occupy the professional time of the legal practitioner concerned.

5.18.11 Express provisions of the contract that comes into being between a legal practitioner and the Board, when notice of the acceptance of a legal aid instruction reaches the CEO in Pretoria, are that any legal practitioner who, save with the written consent of the CEO:

5.18.11.1 fails to include a prayer for costs in any process, including any counterclaim, by which litigation is initiated; or

5.18.11.2 enters into any agreement of settlement or permits the legal aid applicant to enter into any settlement which expressly or by necessary implication waives the Board's rights in terms of Section 8A of the Act; or

fails to take any steps prescribed in the Guide or customary in litigation to protect the Board's rights to costs or anticipated costs;

shall be liable to the Board in damages in his/her personal capacity. The Board shall be absolved from the payment of any fees and/or disbursements otherwise payable to the legal practitioner and/or his/her firm/practice/ partnership/ employer/company until such damages have been determined. The Board shall be entitled to set off any fees and disbursements due to the legal practitioner and/or his/her firm/practice/ partnership/employer/ company against any damages to the Board.

COMPULSORY CONTRIBUTION TO THE LEGAL AID FUND

5.19.1 When a litigant who is being assisted by the Board obtains a financial benefit as a result of a settlement or judgement during any stage after legal aid was granted to him/her, the representative must deduct a percentage of the benefit as determined by the Board from time to time and laid down in terms of Annexure I from the financial benefit and pay it to the Board irrespective of whether legal costs have been recovered or not. This sum is known as the Benefit to the Board. If the provisions of paragraph 5.13.7 are applicable, the Benefit to the Board is to be calculated on the balance of the financial benefit to client after deduction of any costs included in a lump sum award. See Annexures H.1 and H.2 for examples of possible calculations.

5.19.2 When legal aid is granted in any civil matter, the legal aid officer must ensure, before the legal aid instruction is forwarded to the legal practitioner instructed, that the legal aid applicant undertakes, in writing, that the Board and the legal practitioner are thereby irrevocably authorised, and the latter is instructed to:

5.19.2.1 give notice to any other party to the litigation or contemplated litigation concerned, that any payment is to be made only to the legal practitioner instructed, or in the event of his/her withdrawal, to the Board, and not to the legal aid applicant; and to;

5.19.2.2 receive any amount due to the legal aid applicant as a result of any court order or settlement and retain all amounts in respect of costs and 50% of any other amounts until the indebtedness of the legal aid applicant to the Board has been determined and discharged; and to;

5.19.2.3 pay to the Board all amounts due to the Board including the Benefit to the Board calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Guide, and that the legal aid applicant undertakes not to personally seek payment of any amount claimed in terms of the litigation or contemplated litigation and to immediately pay over any amount received on account of such litigation or contemplated litigation to the legal practitioner instructed or, in the event of his/her withdrawal, to the Board.

5.19.3 The legal aid officer shall ensure that the provisions of the prescribed written undertaking is signed by the legal aid applicant and is understood by the legal aid applicant.

5.19.4 The original of such written undertaking shall be attached to the LA 2C forwarded to the CEO while a copy thereof shall be, attached to LA 2A forwarded to the legal practitioner instructed.

5.20 SECURITY AND COURT FEES

5.20.1 Subject to the provisions of paragraph 5.20.2, a client is exempted in certain circumstances from the obligation to furnish security for the costs of an opposing party and to pay certain court fees. In this regard reference is made to rule 47A of the Uniform Rules, rule 6(6) of the Rules of Supreme Court of Appeal, rules 51(1) and 51(4) of the Magistrate's Court Rules, and the rules of the Divorce Court. If any sum is required to be deposited as security, legal aid must not be granted until it is, clear that the client has the means to make payment of such security. The Board does not advance monies for this purpose.

5.20.2 Legal aid litigants (as in the case of in forma pauperis litigants) may be compelled to furnish security in terms of section 14(4)(b) of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act, 1986 (Act 84 of 1986).

5.20.3 Legal practitioners should note the effect of Mthetwa and Others, V. Diedericks and Others 1996(7) BCLR 1012 (N) on the requirement of security for costs set out in Magistrate's Court Rule 49(1).

5.20.4 The Board will not provide funds for the purposes of furnishing security if it is in fact required.

5.21 POSTPONEMENTS

5.21.1 It is the duty of every legal practitioner acting on behalf of the Board to ensure that the matter is dealt with expeditiously. Every effort must be made to avoid any delay or postponement in prosecution of the matter. Consequently, postponements must be avoided. In particular, the right of an accused to a withdrawal of the charge or to have the trial proceeded with must be enforced. On the other hand, the duty to provide proper representation applies to the legal practitioner. He/she must ensure that he/she supplies adequate and proper representation and that he/she does not curtail his/her assistance for the sake of expediency.
CHAPTER 6

VALUE ADDED TAX - SELF-INVOICING

6.1 The Board is registered as a vendor for VAT.

6.2 To facilitate the issuing of VAT invoices for the correct amount the Board has obtained permission from the Commissioner for Inland Revenue to make use of the self-invoicing method in terms of the Value Added Tax Act, 1991 (Act 89 of 1991).

6.3 Legal practitioners who are registered as vendors for VAT must not issue tax invoices, debit or credit notes to the Board in respect of fees, but must furnish a statement instead, on which they also quote their VAT registration number.

6.4 Once the statement has been taxed, the Board will issue a tax invoice on behalf of the legal practitioner. The original will be forwarded to the legal practitioner together with its remittance and the Board will retain a copy for its records.

6.5 Legal practitioners must account to the Receiver of Revenue for the VAT per the tax invoices provided by the Board.

6.6 Legal practitioners who are not registered as vendors for VAT will continue to invoice the Board as before stating on the invoice that they are not registered for VAT.

6.7 The system of self-invoicing has been implemented as follows:

6.7.1 From 2 January 1997, all new legal aid instructions have been issued on new forms incorporating the self-invoicing system and the Board makes all payments under these provisions.

6.7.2 All outstanding fee accounts which could to be finalised by 31 March 1997, and which were issued under the old system were finalised under the previous system.

6.7.3 All other accounts are dealt with under the new system of self-invoicing and the Board arranged with legal practitioners in instances in which instructions were given prior to 2 January 1997, to consent to the system of self invoicing. Where instructions were issued after 1 January 1997, legal practitioners consented to the self-invoicing system by virtue of their acceptance of such instructions.

6.8 Any vendor who wishes to be paid VAT by the Board must annually, on or before 31st January in each calendar year, furnish to the Board a certified copy of his/her/their/its VAT registration certificate together with a written undertaking to forthwith advise the Board should the vendor de-register as a VAT vendor at any time.
CHAPTER 7

GENERAL

7.1 DISCRETIONARY POWERS OF THE CEO

7.1.1 The CEO has a general discretionary power with regard to the administration of the legal aid scheme as prescribed by the Board from time to time. This discretion must be exercised on reasonable grounds. The CEO may not waive any provision of the Guide requiring him to report to the Board, nor may he/she waive the provisions of this paragraph 7.1. The CEO may also not waive any limitations in respect of the maximum (increased) judicare fees in respect of any class of work.

7.1.2 Delegation of powers of the CEO.

7.1.2.1 Save as set out below: The CEO may in writing, delegate any powers vested in him/her by this Guide to other officers or agents of the Board and may further delegate to the said officers or agents the authority to further delegate.

7.1.2.2 The CEO may be advised on, but shall not delegate:

7.1.2.2.1 The authority to authorise special fees in terms of paragraph 2 of Annexure E.2;

7.1.2.2.2 The authority to authorise increased fees in terms of paragraph 5 of Annexure E.3;

7.1.2.2.3 The authority to authorise increased fees in terms of paragraph 2 of Annexure E.4;

7.1.2.2.4 The authority to authorise increased fees in terms of paragraph 7 of Annexure F.2; and

7.1.2.2.5 The authority to authorise the reinbursement of travel within a magisteral district in terms of paragraph 1.6 of Annexure F.3. However, having authorised the reimbursement of travel within a particular magisteral district the CEO is not thereafter required to personally authorise each and every travel claim.

7.1.2.2.6 The authority to authorise the conduct of any Hague Convention matter on a legal aid basis.

7.2 GENERAL

7.2.1 The Board revises its scheme periodically and suggestions in connection with possible solutions to problems and improvement of the practical operation of the scheme are welcomed. Legal practitioners must submit their suggestion to their respective Law Societies and Bar Councils for transmission to the Board.

7.2.2 The Board may amend this Guide, the Annexures thereto and the tariffs set out in Annexures E.1 to F.5 hereto periodically to cater for increases in the cost of living, new types of work to be conducted on a legal aid basis, the elimination of abuses and the clarifiction of uncertainties. Such amendments to the Guide shall be set out in a circular approved by the Board and signed by the CEO.

7.2.2.1 In the case of legal practitioners the circular shall be distributed to the Law Societies of the Northern Provinces, the Cape of Good Hope, the Free State and Kwa-Zulu/Natal, the General Council of the Bar of South African, the Criminal Law Bar of South Africa and the Association of Independent Advocates of South Africa before the date on which the amendments therein set out come into operation.

7.2.2.2 The contents of any circular shall be incorporated in the Guide when such is next submitted to the Minister of Justice in terms of Section 3A(2) of the Act as it is about to be amended by Section 2 of the Legal Aid Amendment Act No. 20 of 1996, failing which such amendments shall lapse on the date on which the Guide is next ratified by the National Assembly.

7.2.3 The rendering of legal aid for certain services may be suspended by the Board from time to time, and the Board may also from time to time institute restrictions on legal costs in certain matters.

7.3 COMMENCEMENT

7.3.1 This Guide is called the Legal Aid Guide, 2001 and comes into operation on the date on which Section 2 of the Legal Aid Amendment Act, No 2 of 1996 comes into operation.

This Guide replaces the ninth edition of the Legal Aid Guide issued in January 1996 and all circulars up to and including Circular 1of 2001.

ANNEXURE A.2

LEGAL AID AMENDMENT ACT NO. 20 OF 1996


[ASSENTED TO 10 APRIL, 1996]
[DATE OF COMMENCEMENT TO BE PROCLAIMED]

(English text signed by the President)



ACT

To amend the Legal Aid Act, 1969, so as to amplify the objects and powers of the Legal Aid Board; to make provision for a Legal Aid Guide; to determine guidelines for granting legal aid; and to provide that the Legal Aid Act, 1969, shall apply throughout the Republic; to repeal corresponding laws in the former independent states; and to provide for matters connected therewith.

1. Amendment of section 3 of Act 22 of 1969, as amended by section 1 of Act 47 of 1989.

Section 3 of the Legal Aid Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the principal Act), is hereby amended-

(a) by the substitution for the words preceding paragraph (a) of the following words:

"The objects of the board shall be to render or make available legal aid to indigent persons and to provide legal representation at State expense as contemplated in the Constitution, and to that end the board shall, in addition to any other powers vested in it by this Act, have power-"; and

(b) by the insertion after paragraph (d) of the following paragraph:

"(dA) to provide, subject to section 3A (3), legal representation at State expense as contemplated in section 25 (1) (c) and (3) (e), read with section 33 (2), of the Constitution, where substantial injustice would otherwise result;".

2. Insertions of section 3A and 3B in Act 22 of 1969.
The following sections are hereby inserted in the principal Act after section 3:

"Legal Aid Guide

3A (1)(a) Subject to the provisions of this act and in order to attain its objects and to exercise its powers referred to in section 3 (d) and (dA), the board shall, in consultation with the Minister, include particulars of the scheme under which legal aid is rendered or made available and the procedure for its administration in a guide called the Legal Aid Guide.

(b) The provisions of the Legal Aid Guide shall be binding upon the board, its officers and employees.

(2) The board shall, in addition to the submission of its annual report as contemplated in section 9(11), submit the Legal Aid Guide at least once every year to the Minister and the Minister shall forthwith cause the Legal Aid Guide to be tabled in the National Assembly and the Senate for ratification, and pending such ratification the Legal Aid Guide then in operation shall continue to apply.

(3) Whenever the board considers an application for the rendering of legal aid, other than a matter referred to the board in terms of section 3B (1), and whether the application is made in terms of section 25 (1) (c) or (3) (e) of the Constitution or otherwise, the board shall apply the provisions of the Legal Aid Guide.

Direction for legal aid by court in criminal matters

3B (1) Before a court in criminal proceedings directs that a person be provided with legal representation at State expense, the court shall-

(a) take into account-

(i) the personal circumstances of the person concerned;
(ii) The nature and gravity of the charge on which the person is to be tried or of which he or she has been convicted, as the case may be;
(iii) whether any other legal representation at State expense is available or has been provided; and
(iv) Any other factor which in the opinion of the court should be taken into account; and

(b) refer the matter for evaluation and report by the board.

(2) (a) If a court refers a matter under subsection (1) (b), the board shall, subject to the provisions of the Legal Aid Guide, evaluate and report on the matter.

(b) The report in question shall be in writing and be submitted to the registrar or the clerk of the court, as the case may be, who shall make a copy thereof available to the court and the person concerned.

(c) The report shall include-

(i) a recommendation whether the person concerned qualifies for legal representation;
(ii) particulars relating to the factors referred to in subsection (1) (a) (i) and (iii); and
(iii) Any other factor, which in the opinion of the board should be taken into account.

3. Amendment of section 4 of Act 22 of 1969, as amended by section 2 of Act 47 of 1989, section 1 of Act 1 of 1991 and section 9 of Act 139 of 1992.

Section 4 of the principal Act is hereby amended by the addition to subsection (1) of the following paragraph:

"(g) no more than six members appointed by the President in consultation with the Cabinet."

4. Amendment of section 5 of Act 22 of 1969.

Section 5 of the principal Act is hereby amended by the substitution for subsection (2) of the following subsection:

"(2) The chairperson of the board may at any time, and shall at the request in writing of not less than eight members of the board, convene a special meeting of the board, to be held at such time and place as he or she may determine."

5. Amendment of section 6 of Act 22 of 1969.

Section 6 of the principal Act is hereby amended by the substitution for subsection (1) of the following subsection:

"(1) The quorum at any meeting of the board shall be eight members thereof.".

6. Extension of Application of Act 22 of 1969.

The Legal Aid Act, 1969, shall apply throughout the Republic.

7. Repeal of laws and savings

(1) The laws referred to in the Schedule are hereby repealed to the extent indicated in the third column thereof.

(2) Any person on the fixed establishment of a Legal Aid Board established in terms of a law repealed by subsection (1) shall, without interruption of service, on the date of commencement of this Act, and subject to the conditions of employment and remuneration approved by the Minister of Justice in terms of section 8 of the principal Act, become an employee of the Legal Aid Board established by section 2 of the principal Act: Provided that the board may recommend to the Minister concerned that a person retain in full or in part a particular term or condition of employment that is more favourable than any term or condition of employment determined in terms of section 8, if there are special circumstances which justify such retention: Provided further that any such retention of a more favourable term or condition of employment shall not continue for more than 12 months after the date of such recommendation.

(3) If, for the purpose of subsection (2)-

(a) the question arises whether any person performs functions pertaining to a Legal Aid Board; or

(b) Any question arises in connection with the determination of conditions of employment or remuneration,

it shall be determined by the Minister of Justice.

(4) All assets, including funds and administrative records, rights, duties and liabilities which immediately prior to the commencement of this Act vested in the a Legal Aid Board established in terms of a law repealed by subsection (1) shall, on the date of commencement of this Act devolve upon the Legal Aid Board established by section 2 of the principal Act.

8. Short Title and Commencement.

This Act shall be called the Legal Aid Amendment Act, 1996, and shall come into operation on a date fixed by the President by proclamation in the Gazette.

SCHEDULE
Laws repealed by Section 7

Number and Year of Law

Short Title

Extent of Repeal

Act No. 22 of 1969

Legal Aid Act, 1969
(Ciskei)

The whole

Act No. 2 of 1973

Transkei and Legal Aid Act,
1973 (Transkei)

The whole

Act No. 39 of 1978

General Law Amendment
Act, 1978 (Transkei)

Section 12, 13,
14, 15, 16 and
17

Act No. 8 of 1982

Legal Aid Amendment Act,
1982 (Ciskei)

The whole

Act No. 13 of 1983

Legal Aid Act, 1983 (Venda)
The Whole

The whole

Act No. 8 of 1988

Legal Aid Act, 1983 (Bophuthatswana)

The whole


Act No. 10 of 1988

General Law Amendment Act, 1988 (Bophuthatswana)

Section 5


ANNEXURE A.3

COMMENCEMENT OF THE LEGAL AID AMENDMENT ACT,
1996 (ACT NO 20 OF 1996)

SECTION

DATE

1(a) amends Sect 3 of principal act

17 October 1997

1(b) inserts (dA) in Sec 3 of the principal act

Not yet in operation

1. Insertion of Sect 3A in principal act

To be proclaimed after
Ratification of this legal Aid Guide by the National Assembly

2. Insertion of Sect 3B in principal act

Not yet in operation

3. amends Sect 4 of principal act

1 October 1998

4. amends Sect 5 of principal act

1 October 1998

5. amends Sect 6 of principal act

1 October 1998

6. extension of application throughout RSA

1 April 1998

7. Repeal of laws and saving

1 April 1998

8. Short title and commencement

10 April 1996


ANNEXURE B.1

Legal Aid Board Justice CENTRES

CLINIC

PRINCIPAL

POSTAL ADDRESS

STREET ADDRESS

TEL NO

FAX NO

Alexandra Community Law Clinic

Ms Mavis Monama

PO Box 2287
Bramley
2018

Oliver Tambo Community Centre
128 2nd Street
Wynberg
2090

(011) 8851954

(011) 8871911

Athlone Justice Centre

Ms Mirriam Noor

PO Box 166
Athlone
7764

1st Floor
Athfin Centre
Church Street
Athlone

(021) 697-5252

(021) 6975316

Benoni Justice Centre

Ms Salma Mahomed

PO Box 2972
Benoni
1500

No 2 Grandway Bld
77 Cranbourne Ave
Benoni

(011) 8454311

(011) 4211082

Bloemfontein Clinic

Mr. Pieter Nel

PO Box 9899
Bloemfontein
9300

Sondagskool Gebou
Ground Floor
154B Maitland Street
Bloemfontein

(051) 4479915

(051) 4472106

Cape Town Justice Centre

Mr. Kobus Esterhuizen
and
Mr. Tom Cloete

5 Church Street
Cape Town
8001

5 Church Street
Cape Town

(021) 4264126

(021) 4265766

Durban Justice Centre

Mr. Kishore Mehta
and
Ms Fawzia Baccus

PO Box 4397
Durban, 4000
Docex 214
Durban

Tower C
3rd Floor
Salisbury Centre
330 Smith Street

(031) 3043290
3040100

(031) 3043564
3040471

East London Clinic

Mr. Mac Jeram

PO Box 7570
East London
5201

Room 215/216
Gasson Centre
Church Street
East London

(043) 7437122

(043) 7438488

Empangeni Clinic

Mrs. Romola Rapiti

PO Box 38
Empangeni
3880

Suite 3
Edward Building
10 Union Street
Empangeni

(035) 7924949

(035) 7924954

Germiston Justice Centre

Mr. Motlatsi Molefe

PO Box 4302
Germiston South
1400
Docex 23

10th Floor
Standard Bank Towers
President Street
Germiston

(011) 8257836

(011) 8257987

Grahamstown Justice Centre

Ms Bettina Wyngaard

PO Box 105
Grahamstown
6140

109 Carlton Centre
High Street
Grahamstown

(046) 6229350

(046) 6228873

Johannesburg
Justice Centre

Mr. Ben Pienaar (Office Manager)
Mr Nic duToit (Principal)
Ms Carol Bruyns and Ms Vivienne Fortunat (Senior Public Defenders)

PO Box 62378
Marshalltown
2107
Docex 259

1st Floor
Cape House
c/o Fox & MacLaren Street
Marshalltown

(011) 8386655/8

(011) 8387018

Kimberley Justice Centre

Mr. Zacharia Mashilo

PO Box 846
Kimberley
8300

3rd Floor
Permanent Building
Jones Street

(053) 8322348
8322350
8314362
8314360

(053) 8322356

Mitchell’s Plain Justice Centre

Mr. Julian Thops

PO Box 327
Mitchell’s Plain

Shop 70
Westgate Mall
Morganster Road
Mitchell’s Plain

(021) 3741171/2

(021) 3749955

Phuthaditjhaba Justice Centre

Mr Thembile Mtati

PO Box 15585
Witsieshoek
9870

FDC Office Block E
Cnr Motloung & Setai Street
Phuthaditjhaba
9866

(058) 713-4953
713-4983
713-5000

(058) 713-5002

Pietermaritzburg Legal Clinic

Mr. Bertus Appel

Suite 173
Postnet
X9118
PMB
3200

1st Floor
20 Otto Street
Pietermaritzburg

(033) 3942190

(033) 3422576

Pietersburg Justice Centre

Mr. Tommy Phalatse

PO Box 1314
Pietersburg
0700

1st Floor
AL Smit Building
26 Thabo Mbeki Street

(015) 2912429

(015) 2912455

Port Elizabeth Justice Centre

Mr. Patrick Hundermark
and
Ms Lynette Franklin

PO Box 3433
North End
6056
Docex 127

1st Floor
President Centre
564 Govan Mbeki Avenue
North End

(041) 4842724
4873388

(041) 4873335
4844992

Potchefstroom (Potchefstroom) (Potch II) Legal Aid Clinic


Ms Hantie Groenewald

PO Box 1447
Potch
2520

c/o Van der Hoffweg and Meyer Streets
Potchefstroom
2531

(018) 2930045

(018) 2977425

Potchefstroom (Vereeniging) (Potch I) Legal Aid Clinic

Ms Elzane Botha

PO Box 3948
Vereeniging
1930

1st Floor
Jasmine Mansions
Senator Marks Ave
Vereeniging

(016) 4213527

(016) 4214287

Potchefstroom (Witbank) (Potch III) Legal Aid Clinic

Mr. Rodney Mashego

PO Box 4373
Witbank
1035

Room 121
Kosmos Building
President Ave
Witbank

(013) 6565290

(013) 6565291

Pretoria Justice Centre

Mr. Jannie Kriel

PO Box 1281
Pretoria
0002

2nd Floor
Olivetti Building
c/o Schubart & Pretorius Street
Pretoria

(012) 3284612 (012) 3284673

(012) 4615549
3241950

Roodepoort Justice Centre

Mr. Kobus Boshoff

PO Box 1380
Roodepoort
1725

23 Dumat Street
Roodepoort
1725

(011) 7602003
7602029

(011) 7602040

Soweto Office of the Public Defender

Mr. Maishume Mzaidume

PO Box 392
Pimville
1808

Nicro Centre
c/o Roodepoort & Potchefstroom Road
Mofolo South

(011) 9865005/
5055

(011) 9865172

Stellenbosch Legal Clinic

Ms Cordelia Robertson

44 Banhoek Street
Stellenbosch
7600

44 Banhoek Street
Stellenbosch
7600

(021) 8083700
808-9111

(021) 8083720

Venda Legal Aid Clinic

Mr. Sam Negota

P/Bag X5050
Thohoyandou
0970

University of Venda
Thohoyandou

(0159) 9628000

(0159) 624749

Witwatersrand
Legal Aid Clinic

Ms Shirley Welsh

Private Bag 3
Wits
2050
Docex 197

1 Jan Smuts Avenue
Braamfontein

(011) 7178562

(011) 3392640


ANNEXURE B.2


Legal Aid Board Branch Offices
(As at 19 February 2002)

BRANCH OFFICE

HEAD OF OFFICE

POSTAL ADDRESS

STREET ADDRESS

TEL NO

FAX NO

Bloemfontein
Branch Office

Mrs. Fouché

PO Box 3816
Bloemfontein
9300

1st Floor
2 President Brand Street
Bloemfontein

(051) 4470902
4472136

(051) 4474745

East London
Branch Office

Ms A Jonker

P/Bag X9010
East London
5200

Magistrate's Office
Buffalo Street
East London

(043) 7420245

(043) 7432796

Mafikeng
Branch Office

Mr. Ntsimane

P/Bag X2125
Mafikeng
2745

1st Floor
Hurwitz House
14 Main Street
Mafikeng

(018) 3816120

(018) 3811542

Pietermaritzburg
Branch Office

Mr. Linda Mandlakazi

PO Box 84
Pietermaritzburg
3200

Room 246,
2nd Floor
Magistrate's Office
c/o Church & Otto Street
Pietermaritzburg

(033) 3944810

(033) 3423359


ANNEXURE C

MEANS TESTS

C.1 MEANS TEST FOR LEGAL AID OTHER THAN IN TERMS OF THE CONSTITUTION - see also Annexure G.1


C.1.1 SINGLE PERSONS AND ESTRANGED SPOUSES

A person with a calculated income not exceeding R600.00 per month, together with an addition thereto of R180.00 per dependent child, qualifies for legal aid.

C.1.2 MARRIED PERSONS

A married person with a calculated joint income not exceeding R1 200.00 per month together, with an addition thereto of R180.00 per dependent child, qualifies for legal aid.

C.2 MEANS TEST FOR LEGAL AID IN TERMS OF SECTION 35 (3) (g) AND 35 (2) (c) OF THE CONSTITUTION

See paragraph 2.6 and Annexures G.2 and G.3

ANNEXURE D

The Regional Land Claims Commissioner
___________________________ Region
Address: __________________________
__________________________
__________________________

Date: ___________________

To: The Legal Aid Board ________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________

Dear Sir,

Re: LEGAL AID APPLICANT:______________________
CLAIM NO: _________________________________

The above person(s)/community/organisation has submitted a claim to the above office of the Commission on the Restitution of Land rights under the above claim number.

The attempted mediation of the claim has not resulted in a satisfactory settlement thereof and the matter is now ripe to proceed to the Land Claims Court in an action in which the parties will be:

Plaintiffs: ________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________

Defendants: ________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
D-1

The Commission has determined that it would be advantageous for the claimants/applicant to enjoy legal representation in the proceedings before the Land Claims Court and;

1. * (Where the claimant/applicant is a natural person) you are requested to determine whether the claimant/legal aid applicant qualifies for legal aid in terms of the means test set out in the Legal Aid Guide and, if appropriate, to issue a suitable legal aid instruction to an attorney.

2. * (if the claimant/legal aid applicant is a community or organisation) the Commission has determined that the claimant/legal aid applicant is unable to afford the cost of his own legal representation before the Land Claims Court and you are requested to issue a suitable legal aid instruction in favour of an attorney.

Yours faithfully,



_________________________________
LAND CLAIMS COMMISSIONER

* Delete whatever is inapplicable.

ANNEXURE E.2

FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS PAYABLE TO LEGAL PRACTITIONERS IN RESPECT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS



Matters

Appeals to the High Court from the Magistrates’ Court

Appeals to the Supreme Court of Appeal or full bench of the High Court


1.1 Report to the Director of the Legal Aid Board on the merits of a matter.

1.2.1 Application for leave to appeal brought on the same day judgment was handed down.

1.2.2 Notice of appeal

1.3 Application for leave to appeal brought on a date other than the date on which judgment is handed down and provided the Director is satisfied that there was good reason for the legal practitioner concerned not bringing such on the date on which judgment was handed down.

1.4 Application for leave to appeal on a date other than the date on which judgment is handed down but where the legal practitioner has failed to satisfy the Director that there was good reason for such application for leave to appeal being brought on another day.

1.5 Petition including all typing, copies and attendances relevant thereto.

1.6 Application for condonation including all typing, copies and attendances relevant thereto.

1.7 Application to lead further evidence including all typing, copies and attendances relevant thereto.

1.8 Application for a copy of a record in terms of Rule 66(9) of the Magistrate’s Court, Rule 49A of the Uniform Rules, Rule 52 of the Uniform Rules including all typing, copies and attendances relevant thereto.

1.9 Necessary perusal of any record after the granting of leave to appeal and pursuant to the issue of a fresh legal aid instruction or where otherwise permitted by the Director.

1.10 Heads of argument including all typing, copies and attendances relevant thereto.

1.11 On appearing before court to argue appeal and including the noting of judgment, the final report to the Director and the report back to the legal aid applicant.








1.12 The fees in the preceding paragraph shall be increased by 25% for each additional accused being represented to a maximum of an additional 150% for all co-accused.





1.13 Any necessary consultation with an accused or a witness whose evidence is yet to be led. Not more than one consultation per accused or per witness.

1.14 Application for bail pending appeal provided the accused was not in custody prior to conviction.

1.15 Necessary traveling costs.









1.16 Necessary accommodation and subsistence expenses. Such must be supported by relevant vouchers and tax invoices. Accommodation and subsistence are not permitted where the practitioner practices less than 117 kilometers from the court, which is to hear the matter.

1.17 Other disbursements.



1.18 VAT on fees and disbursements in respect of those legal practitioners registered for VAT.


R112,50

N/A


R 75,00





N/A




N/A

N/A


R 75,00


R 75,00



R37,50




75c per page



R300.00


R750,00
This fee includes any consultations or perusal on that day and any application made on that day.



25% extra on 1.11 above for each additional accused up to 7 represented by the practitioner on a legal aid basis.

R112,50



R 37,50


R1,50 per kilometer excluding VAT where applicable for a total distance traveled in excess of 234 kilometers or economy class airfare whichever is the lesser.

Not more than R350,00 per night excluding VAT.


As authorised by the Director in writing in advance.

14%


R150,00

R112,50


N/A





R150,00




Nil to R90,00

R300,00


R112,50


R112,50



R37,50




75c per page



R300.00


R1050,00
This fee includes any consultations or perusal on that day and any application made on that day.

25% extra on 1.11 above for each additional accused up to 7 represented by the practitioner on a legal aid basis.



R112,50



R37,50


R1,50 per kilometer excluding VAT where applicable for a total distance traveled in excess of 234 kilometers or economy class airfare whichever is the lesser.

Not more than R350,00 per night excluding VAT.


As authorised by the Director in writing in advance.

14%


The Director has a general discretion to agree to special fees in circumstances, which justify deviation from the above tariff.

With effect from 1 April 2001 a surcharge of 10% will be permitted on the fees allowed in terms of paragraphs 1.1 to 1.14 above.

ANNEXURE E.3

TARIFFS IN RESPECT OF CRIMINAL TRIALS

1. For appearing before any court when a postponement is granted at the request of the State, a fee of R90,00 excluding VAT shall be allowed.

2. For appearing before court and any other professional services incidental thereto on any trial day a legal practitioner shall be entitled to the following fees:

District Magistrates’ Court R600,00 excluding VAT.
Regional Magistrates’ Court R710,00 excluding VAT.
High Court R820,00 excluding VAT.

3. In the event of the duration of a trial day not amounting in aggregate to 4 hours the trial day fee set out above shall be reduced pro rata provided that in respect of any trial day a minimum of R90,00 excluding VAT shall be allowed.

4. No additional fees will be permitted in respect of any trial day lasting in excess of four hours or in respect of any preparation, consultation, waiting time, perusal or any other attendance whatsoever. The fees set out in paragraph 2 above are all inclusive fees and save as set out below, no additional fees will be permitted. No additional fees will be permitted in respect of a legal practitioner who represents more than one accused.

5. Only in very exceptional circumstances will any increased fees be permitted. In the event of increased fees being authorised, such shall not exceed R2000,00 per trial day excluding VAT. In considering whether or not to grant increased fees, the CEO of the Board shall take no account per se of the number of charges faced by the accused or the number of accused in the matter. In highly rare and very exceptional circumstances, the CEO of the Board may authorise the instruction of a second legal practitioner to assist the legal practitioner who appears at the trial at 60% of the fees allowed to the first legal practitioner. In no circumstances will a third legal practitioner be permitted in respect of any accused or group of co-accused who are represented by a single legal team.

6. In matters that were part heard as at 1 November 1999 and in which increased fees had been allowed prior to 1 November 1999 the CEO shall enjoy a discretion, to be exercised after consideration of written representations, to permit the matter to continue at the increased fees authorised prior to 1 November 1999 where it would be in the interest of the administration of justice and of the Board to do so.

7. A legal practitioner submitting an account to the Legal Aid Board may be required to attach to such account a certificate by the presiding judicial officer or his/her registrar (if any) verifying the appearances and times set out in the legal practitioner’s account. The said certificate is currently required in respect of all criminal trials in the High Court but is not currently required in respect of criminal trials in the magistrates’ courts.

8. It shall be the responsibility of the legal practitioner upon submitting his/her account to ensure that the Board is placed in possession of all documentation that will enable it to pay the legal practitioner’s account. Provided this requirement is fully and properly complied with, the Legal Aid Board will attempt in respect of High Court Criminal trials to dispatch a cheque in payment of the said account within 30 days of receipt thereof or, in the event of electronic bank transfers being implemented by the Board, to instruct its bankers to effect payment.

9. Bail and other interlocutory applications, subject to the submission by the practitioner of written representations:

District and District and Regional Courts:
Bail application if done other than on day of postponement or trial day.

9.1 As to why it was necessary, if applicable, to bring the application on a date prior to the next scheduled hearing;

All-inclusive fee for all attendances.

Unopposed: R150,00

9.2 As to why, if the bail application was unsuccessful, the practitioner believed that such enjoyed a reasonable prospect of success;

Opposed: R350,00

9.3 As to why, in the case of inter-locutory applications other than bail applications, such application was necessary;

High Court: Bail application if done other than on day of postponement or trial day.
All-inclusive fee for all attendances.

and further subject to not more than one bail application per accused per case.

Unopposed: R250,00
Opposed: R500,00


Under no circumstances will any collapse/reservation/ cancellation/waiting time fees be paid by the Board to any legal practitioner in respect of any criminal matters, criminal appeals, civil matters, matters in terms of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997 or any other matters whatsoever. The Board will pay legal practitioners in accordance with its tariffs strictly according to services rendered and in so far as the applicable tariff makes provision for the service rendered.

After the case has been finalised the legal practitioner must report to the Director in writing setting out the following information:

11.1 The case number.

11.2 The court where the matter was heard.

11.3 The outcome of the matter.

11.4 The duration of the hearing.

11.5 Any other material information.

12. After the case has been finalised and whenever a legal practitioner accounts to the Board in respect of a criminal trial the account shall be submitted in the format set out and with all the requested information and certification provided for in Annexure K.

13. A legal practitioner who is appointed on a legal aid basis to represent an accused at a criminal trial after the accused has pleaded and after evidence has been led and if such legal practitioner was not present when such evidence was led, shall be entitled to apply to the trial court for the provision to such legal practitioner at the expense of the Department of Justice of a copy of a transcript of the evidence led in his/her absence and, if such application is granted, to peruse such transcript. The following fees exclusive of VAT will be allowable in the above mentioned circumstances:

13.1 Application for a transcript of the evidence R37,50

13.2 Perusal of the record 50c per page

ANNEXURE F.1


TARIFFS OF FEES PAYABLE IN RESPECT OF CIVIL MATTERS AND DISBURSEMENTS GENERALLY

A. With regard to legal aid instructions issued prior to 1 April 1988 legal practitioners shall be remunerated in accordance with the provisions and tariffs as set out in the fifth edition of the Guide of July 1983.

B. With regard to legal aid instructions issued from 1 April 1988 legal practitioners shall be remunerated in accordance with the provisions and tariffs as set out in the sixth edition of the Guide of April 1988.

C. With effect from 1 July 1993 legal practitioners will be remunerated in accordance with the tariffs as set out in the seventh edition of the Guide of July 1993 as amplified by any new tariffs authorised by the Minister of Justice or circulated by the CEO with the consent of the Board from time to time.

D. With effect from 1 January 1996 attorneys shall be remunerated in accordance with the provisions and tariffs as set out in the eighth edition of the Guide of January 1996 as amplified by any new tariffs authorised by the Minister of Justice or circulated by the CEO with the consent of the Board from time to time.

E. With effect from 1 January 1995 attorneys shall be remunerated in accordance with the provisions and tariffs as set out in the ninth edition of the Guide of January 1995 as amplified by any new tariffs authorised by the Minister of Justice or circulated by the CEO with the consent of the Board from time to time.

F. With effect from 1 November 1999 legal practitioners will be remunerated in accordance with the tariffs set out in circulars 4 and 5 of 1999.

G. With effect from 1 April 2001 legal practitioners will be remunerated in accordance with Annexures F.2, F.3, F.4 and F.5.

F.1-1
ANNEXURE F.2

TARIFFS IN RESPECT OF CIVIL MATTERS

1. In respect of taking instructions and submitting a report on the merits of the matter to the head office of the Legal Aid Board a legal practitioner shall be entitled to a fee of R110,00 excluding VAT.

2. After having been authorised to proceed with a matter on a legal aid basis and in respect of the drawing and settling of all pleadings, in respect of motions (other than interlocutory motions) the drawing and settling of all affidavits, the issue of process and all correspondence, attendances, perusals and consultations relevant thereto, including the conclusion of any settlement agreement and the taking of any judgement by default or consent but excluding necessary disbursements in respect of revenue stamps and sheriff’s fees:

In a Magistrates’ Court or any other Lower Court:
R440,00 excluding VAT.

In any Division of the High Court or in the Land Claims Court or the Labour Court: R660,00 excluding VAT.

3. In respect of all pre-trial consultations, correspondence, attendances and other necessary pre-trial work but excluding any disbursements authorised by the Legal Aid Board in respect of the fees of experts:

In the Magistrates’ Court and any other Lower Court:
R440,00 excluding VAT.

In any Division of the High Court or in the Land Claims Court or in the Labour Court: R660,00 excluding VAT.

4. On trial or opposed motion (other than an interlocutory motion) including any correspondence, consultations, attendances, perusals and all other work conducted after the commencement of the trial:

In the Magistrates’ Court or any other Lower Court:
R660,00 per trial day excluding VAT.

In any Division of the High Court or in the Land Claims Court or in the Labour Court: R820,00 excluding VAT per trial day.

5. On appeal to a Division of the High Court or to the Labour Appeal Court or to the Constitutional Court or to the Supreme of Appeal:
R1100,00 excluding VAT.

6. The fees set out in this Annexure F.2 are all inclusive fees and no other fees by any attorney or advocate in respect of any work performed on or after 1 November 2001 pursuant to any legal aid instruction issued at any time whatsoever will be allowed.

7. Only in very exceptional circumstances will any increased fees be permitted and then only in respect of the trial day/appeal fees set out in paragraphs 4 and 5 above. In the event of increased fees being authorised, such shall not exceed R2000,00 per trial day/appeal excluding VAT. In considering whether to grant increased fees, the CEO shall take no account per se of the number of claims dealt with in the matter or the number of litigants involved in the matter. In highly rare and very exceptional circumstances, the Chief Executive Officer of the Legal Aid Board may authorise the instruction of a second legal practitioner to assist the legal practitioner who appears at the trial/on appeal at 60% of the trial day fees/appeal fees allowed to the first legal practitioner. In no circumstances will a third legal practitioner be permitted in respect of any litigant or group of litigants who are represented by a single legal team.

8. In the event of the duration of a trial day not amounting in aggregate to four hours the trial day fees set out above shall be reduced pro rata provided that in respect of any trial day a minimum of R90,00 excluding VAT shall be allowed.

9. No additional fees will be permitted in respect of any trial day lasting in excess of four hours or in respect of any intra trial preparation, consultation, waiting time, perusal or any other attendance whatsoever. The fees set out in this Annexure F.2 are all-inclusive fees and save as provided for in paragraph 7 above no additional fees will be permitted. No additional fees will be permitted in respect of a legal practitioner who represents more than one litigant in any particular matter.

10. Uniform Rule 43 applications including any disbursements in respect of correspondents and counsel.

Undefended R380,00 excluding VAT
Defended R520,00 excluding VAT
ANNEXURE F.3

DISBURSEMENTS

The following disbursements shall be allowed over and above the fees set out in Annexures E.2, E.3, E.4, F.2, F.4 and F.5.

The fees of any expert authorised by the Legal Aid Board at the rate so authorised and to the extent of any maximum authorised.

Necessary revenue stamps.

Necessary sheriff’s fees or like process (edictal citation). Necessary advertisement costs pursuant to the grant of a substituted service order.

Necessary travel outside of any magisterial district in which the legal practitioner concerned has an office: R1,50 per kilometre excluding VAT or economy class air fare, whichever is the lesser.

Where it is necessary for a legal practitioner to hire accommodation for himself/herself at the seat of a court more than 117 kilometres from his/her offices/chambers the Board shall, subject to the submission of supporting vouchers, reimburse such legal practitioner in respect of accommodation and subsistence at the actual cost thereof not exceeding R350,00 (excluding VAT) per night.

The CEO, if it appears to him/her to be in the interests of the administration of justice and the Board, be entitled to authorise the reimbursement of necessary travel within a particular magisterial district by legal practitioners practising in that magisterial district at R1,50 per kilometre excluding VAT or economy class air fare, whichever is the lesser.

Save as set out above, no other disbursements, including, but not by way of limitation, counsel’s fees and correspondent’s fees shall be paid to any legal practitioner without the prior written consent of the CEO of the Board or any Principal Attorney, Legal Administration Officer, Senior Legal Administration Officer or Principal Legal Administration Officer delegated by the CEO of the Board to make such decision on his/her behalf.

ANNEXURE F.4

TARIFF OF FEES APPLICABLE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND MAINTENANCE MATTERS


1. Consultation to advise the legal aid recipient of his/her rights, the nature of the proceedings and to assist in the completion of forms.


R35-00 excluding VAT per completed 15 minutes subject to a maximum of R140-00 excluding VAT.


2. Opposed proceedings in which the opposite party is represented by a legal practitioner:



2.1 For appearing before court when a postponement is granted at the request of the opposing party.


R90-00 excluding VAT.


2.2 For appearing before court and all other professional services incidental thereto.


R600-00 excluding VAT per trial day subject to a minimum of R90-00 excluding VAT.


3. In the event of the duration of a trial day not amounting in aggregate to four hours the maximum trial day fee set out above shall be reduced pro rata.

 


ANNEXURE F.5

TARIFF OF FEES APPLICABLE TO ASYLUM MATTERS, HAGUE CONVENTION MATTERS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS

1. ASYLUM MATTERS:

1.1 Assisting and/or advising an applicant with/on an application for asylum in terms of Section 21 of the Refugees Act No 130 of 1998 ("the Refugees Act").



R35,00 excluding VAT per completed 15 minutes subject to a maximum of R140,00 excluding VAT.

1.2 For appearing before a Refugee Status Determination Officer at a hearing in terms of Section 24 of the Refugees Act.

R600,00 excluding VAT per hearing day subject to a minimum of R90,00 excluding VAT.

1.3 For appearing before a Standing Committee in respect of a Review in terms of Section 25 of the Refugees Act.

R600,00 excluding VAT per hearing day subject to a minimum of R90,00 excluding VAT.

1.4 For appearing before an Appeals Board in respect of an Appeal in terms of Section 26 of the Refugees Act.

R600,00 excluding VAT per hearing day subject to a minimum of R90,00 excluding VAT.


1.5 In event of the duration of a hearing before a Refugee Status Determination Officer, or before a Standing Committee or before an Appeals Board no amounting in aggregate to four hours the maximum hearing day fee set out above shall be reduced pro rata.

HAGUE CONVENTION MATTERS:

2.1 The fees payable to legal practitioners in terms of Paragraphs 1 to 9 of Annexure F.2 to this Guide shall apply mutatis mutandis to matters in terms of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Act No. 72 of 1996 and the schedule thereto ("the Hague Convention").

2.2 The disbursements payable to legal practitioners in terms of Annexure F.3 to this Guide shall apply mutatis mutandis to matters in terms the Hague Convention.

MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS:

3.1 The Board shall be entitled by resolution to alter and/or amend the tariffs set out in Annexures E.1 to E.4 and F.1 to F.5 to this Guide.

3.2 Such amendment shall be incorporated in a circular under the signature of the CEO and shall be distributed, inter alia, to the Law Societies of the Northern Provinces, the Cape of Good Hope, the Free State and Kwa-Zulu/Natal, the General Council of the Bar of South Africa, the Criminal Law Bar of South Africa and the Association of Independent Advocates of South Africa.

3.3 Such amendments shall come into operation on a date not earlier than the date on which the circular in question was received by the professional bodies listed in paragraph 3.2 above.

LEGAL AID BOARD LA 13A
MEANS TEST

Office:

Applicant:

Ref No:












(A)







(B)
(C)










(D)




(E)

A. GROSS MONTHLY INCOME

APPLICANT

SPOUSE

 

Salary

R

R

Allowances +

R

R

Subsidy +

R

R

Bonuses +

R

R

Interest +

R

R

Rentals +

R

R

Maintenance received +

R

R

Other +

R

R

TOTAL =

R +

R =

R

B. ASSETS

APPLICANT

SPOUSE

 

Fixed property: Reasonable market value

R

R

Less Bonds -

R

R

Sub-total =

R

R

Investments & Savings +

R

R

Monies due to applicant +

R

R

TOTAL NET VALUE =

R

R

DIVIDE BY 120 =

R +

R =

R

C. TOTAL GROSS MONTHLY INCOME (Totals A + B) =

R

D. DEDUCTIONS

APPLICANT

SPOUSE

 

Income Tax

R

R

Unemployment Insurance Fund +

R

R

Compulsory group insurance +

R

R

Medical fund contribution +

R

R

Pension fund contribution +

R

R

Rent or mortage instalment (Max R1 000) +

R

R

Maintenance i.t.o court order +

R

R

School fees (Not i.r.o private schools) +

R

R

TOTAL DEDUCTION =

R +

R =

R

E. CALCULATED MONTHLY INCOME (TOTALS C – D) =

R

Less rebates: R600,00 for applicant -

R600,00

R600,00 for spouse (if applicable) -

R

R180,00 per dependant child (R180,00 x …) -

R

TOTAL (No legal aid in case of a PLUS-balance) =

R

Dependants actually supported by the applicant

Name:

Age:

Name:

Age:

Name:

Age:

Name:

Age:

Name:

Age:

Name:

Age:


Complete details of my salary, property and all other income and assets are correctly set out above. All details of my expenses are correctly set out. I actually and regularly pay all the deductions listed above on a monthly basis. I realize that if any of the information set out above is false or incomplete, legal aid will be suspended immediately, and I will be prosecuted for fraud.

Date: ………………………………… Signature of applicant: ……………………………..


Date: ………………………………… Legal Aid Officer: …………………………………..

LEGAL AID BOARD
LA 13B
MEANS TEST IN CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS

Location:

Applicant:

Ref No:

 

Applicant

GROSS INCOME: MONTHLY

Salary

R

Plus

Allowances

+ R

Plus

Subsidy

+ R

Plus

Bonuses

+ R

Plus

Interest

+ R

Plus

Rentals

+ R

Plus

Other

+ R

 

TOTAL =

R

PLUS: PROPERTY

 

IMMOVABLE: Reasonable market value

R

Less bonds

- R

 

= R

OTHER PROPERTY: Bank balances & savings

+ R

Investments & Deposits

+ R

Monies due to Applicant

+ R

NET value

= R

Divide by 120

R

+ R

 

GROSS INCOME =

= R

DEDUCTIONS

   

Income Tax

 

Unemployment Insurance

 

Compulsory Group Insurance

 

Medical Fund Contribution

 

Pension Fund Contribution

 

Rent or mortage instalment (Max R1 000)

 

Maintenance in terms of court order

 

School fees & Contributions ***

 

*** Not applicable to private schools TOTAL DEUCTIONS =

- R

Calculated Income >

= R

Deduct R600 for Applicant

- R

SUB-TOTAL

= R

Deduct R180 per dependant child (if applicable) … x R180 =

- R

 

= R

Dependants actually supported by the applicant

 

Name

Age

Name

Age

Name

Age

Name

Age

Name

Age

Name

Age


Complete details of my salary, property and all other income and assets are correctly set out above. All details of my expenses are correctly set out. I actually and regularly pay all the deductions listed above on a monthly basis. I realize that if any of the information set out above is false or incomplete, legal aid will be suspended immediately, and I will be prosecuted for fraud.

Date: ………………………………… Signature of applicant: ……………………………..


Date: ………………………………… Legal Aid Officer: …………………………………..

ANNEXURE G3
LA 13C

APPLICATION FOR THE PROVISION OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION AT STATE EXPENSE IN TERMS OF SECTION 35(3)(g) OF THE CONSTITUTION

PARTICULARS OF APPLICANT'S INCOME AND EXPENDITURE

BRANCH OR MAGISTRATE’S OFFICE


.........................................................................................……………………

REFERENCE NUMBER

.....................……………………….

NAME OF APPLICANT ...................................................………………….

CO-ACCUSED.................................................................…………………..

NATURE OF CHARGES(S):
If more than one record, total:
................................................…….
................................................…….
................................................…….

COMPLEXITY
.........................................................................................…………………..
.........................................................................................…………………..
........................................................................................……………………

CASE NUMBER



.....................……………………….

IN WHICH COURT WILL TRIAL TAKE PLACE:
Supreme Court/Regional Court/District Court*
(Delete those inapplicable)

ANTICIPATED DURATION OF THE TRIAL:
...............................…………………………………………………………….

INCOME AND ASSETS

EXPENDITURE AND LIABILITIES

1. INCOME

     

1.1 Salary

R

1.

R

1.2

R

2.

R

1.3

R

3.

R

2. ASSETS

 

4.

R

2.1 Immovable

Value

5.

R

Residence

R

6.

R

Other

R

7.

R

2.2 Movable

Value

TOTAL

R

Vehicle

R

Liabilities

 

Furniture

R

1

R

Other

R

2

R

TOTAL

R

TOTAL

R


---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE LEGAL AID OFFICER

DATE
: .................................... G.3-1

ANNEXURE I

BENEFIT TO THE BOARD

1. The benefit to the Board will be 15% of the benefit to the client or the proceeds of the action financed by the Board effective on all instructions issued on or after 1 August 1993, but before 1 January 1997.

2. On 7 October 1996, the Board resolved that as from 1 January 1997:

2.1 Special damages are altogether exempted from the stipulations of paragraph 5.19 of the Guide.

2.2 Maintenance payments are altogether exempted from the stipulations of paragraph 5.19 of the Guide, however, with a discretion vested in the Director to determine what constitutes bona fide maintenance payments and what constitutes an acquisition of assets.

2.3 Where a divorce results in the transfer of assets from one spouse to the other and/or an order providing for division of a joint estate, no contribution will be levied against any benefits so obtained.

2.4 Legal aid litigants are otherwise obliged to contribute as follows on amounts realised from any action:

2.4.1 on the first R20 000,00: 0%

2.4.2 on the next R80 000,00: 5%

on excess over R100 000,00: 10%

3. On 21 April 2001 the Board resolved that in respect of Judicare legal aid instructions issued prior to 1 November 1999 which had not been finalised by 1 November 1999, but in respect of which legal aid was terminated as a result of the decisions taken by the Board on either 1 November 1999 (circular 5 of 1999) and/or 31 March 1999 (circular 1 of 2001) no Benefit would be payable to the Board in terms of paragraph 5.19 of the Legal Aid Guide and no attorney and client costs would be recoverable in terms of paragraph 5.13.7 of the Legal Aid Guide but the costs (usually party and party costs) payable to the Board in terms of Section 8A of the Legal Aid Act would still be recovered.

ANNEXURE J

EXPERT WITNESSES

LAB REFERENCE NO:

CLIENT:

BRANCH:

Plaintiff/Defendant

Date: / /

ATTORNEY

Address

Telephone: ( )

Fax: ( )

Reference:

DATES

Trial:

/ /

Summaries:

/ /

Rule 37

/ /

Expert 1

Expert 2

Expert 3

Name

Occupation

Tariff: consultation

Tariff: preparation

Tariff: research

Tariff: attending court

Tariff: other

Total estimated cost

Estimated days

Disbursements

Urgency

Reasons for choice

Reason for request

Nature of evidence

Area of dispute

DECISION

Official

Date

/ /

Signature

Sent by

Date:

/ /

J-1

ANNEXURE O

DISTRIBUTION OF LEGAL AID INSTRUCTIONS

1. INTRODUCTION


1.1 The accused to whom legal representation is assigned in a criminal matter in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996 or who is granted legal aid in a civil matter in terms of the Legal Aid Scheme conducted by the Board under the Legal Aid Act, is not entitled to choose the legal practitioner who will represent, assist or advise him/her. The Board has the right to determine which legal practitioner will be allocated to which legal aid recipient and further has the right to change the legal practitioner allocated to a particular legal aid recipient.

1.2 No legal aid instruction shall be issued to any legal practitioner in private practice before it is ascertained by the legal aid officer whether a Justice Centre, either in the magisterial district concerned or in any adjoining magisterial district has the capacity to take on the matter. If a Justice Centre has the capacity to take on a particular matter, the legal aid recipient in question will be referred to the Justice Centre. If a legal aid recipient is referred to a Justice Centre, the legal aid officer responsible will record such referral on the legal aid application (LA 1) or if no legal aid application is completed in either a dedicated book or computer programme designed for the purpose.

2. COMPILATION OF THE ROTATION LISTS

On or before 31 October in each calendar year, the legal aid officer, in each magisterial district, shall write to each sole practitioner and each firm of attorneys known to be practising within the magisterial district concerned and not in the employ of the Board or a co-operation partner. To this end, a legal aid officer will consult a current law diary. For purposes of the foregoing, a legal practitioner is a practising attorney or advocate, whether such person practises on a full-time or part-time basis and whether such person practises solely within the magisterial district concerned or also practises elsewhere. A legal practitioner shall be deemed to practise from a physical address within the magisterial district where the legal practitioner actually has law offices/chambers. A legal practitioner who has law offices/chambers in more than one magisterial district shall be regarded as a part-time practitioner in each such magisterial district. The mere fact that a legal practitioner happens to reside within the magisterial district concerned shall not qualify said practitioner as practising within the magisterial district. A legal practitioner does not include a candidate attorney or a pupil.

2.2 The letter to the legal practitioners shall invite them to put forward their names for inclusion in the rotation lists for the next calendar year for legal aid instructions in respect of criminal and civil matters to be heard in the magisterial district concerned.
2.3 The legal practitioners shall be required to reply to the legal aid officer in writing by not later than 30 November of that year. Said replies shall set out the following information:

Full names.
In the case of attorneys, the name of the practice
Physical address.
Postal address.
Telephone number.
Fax number.
Cellular number (if any).
Willingness to accept instructions in civil matters.
Willingness to accept instructions in criminal matters in the Magistrate’s Courts.
Willingness to accept instructions in criminal matters in the High Court (where the High Court sits either permanently or on circuit.).
In the case of advocates, the name of the professional association that exercises disciplinary control over the advocate concerned. (Attorneys may not practise without being a member of a Law Society).
Relevant experience in completed years
Confirmation that the legal practitioner concerned is entitled to appear before the High Court - only necessary in respect of attorneys who wish to have their names placed on the rotation list for criminal matters in the High Court.
In respect of attorneys the full names of any candidate attorney articled to the attorney (not a partner of the attorney) who will be appearing on behalf of the attorney.
Whether the legal practitioner is a part-time or a full-time practitioner.
Confirmation that the legal practitioner will respond timeously to any offer by the legal aid officer of any legal aid instruction.

2.4 Relevant experience shall be computed, taking into account:

Time spent as a practising attorney or candidate attorney regularly undertaking the defence of criminal matters since the date of the grant of a certificate giving the legal practitioner a right of appearance as a candidate attorney.

In the case of advocates, time spent in private practice during which period the advocate concerned regularly undertook the defence of criminal matters. Time spent employed as a magistrate hearing criminal matters. Time spent as a public prosecutor in the district or regional courts.

Time spent in the employ of a Director of Public Prosecutions or as a Director of Public Prosecutions handling the conduct of criminal matters in courts.

2.5 Annually, during December, the legal aid officer in each magisterial district will compile two alphabetical list, by surname, of all legal practitioners practising within the district who have indicated their willingness to and qualify to undertake legal aid instructions in civil and criminal matters respectively in the Magistrate’s Courts of the district.
2.6.1 In every magisterial district in which there is a seat of the High Court or which is visited by the High Court on circuit, the legal aid officer will annually during December, compile a third alphabetical list, by surname, of all legal practitioners practising within the district who have indicated their willingness to and qualify to undertake legal aid instructions in criminal matters in the High Court. No advocate’s name shall appear on any High Court rotation list unless this advocate has satisfied the legal aid officer that the advocate is a member of a professional association, which exercises disciplinary control over its members. The Board currently accepts that the Criminal Law Bar of South Africa and the General Council of the Bar of South Africa and their subsidiary Bars exercise disciplinary control over their members. In the event of the Board accepting that any further professional associations of advocates exercise disciplinary control over their members, legal aid officers will be advised thereof per circular. In the case of attorneys, it will be necessary for attorneys to have satisfied the legal aid officer that they are entitled to appear before the High Court before the legal aid officer will included their names on the High Court rotation list.

2.6.2 No advocate’s name, whatsoever, shall appear on any civil rotation list.

2.7 The rotation lists shall be complied in the format set out in Appendix 1 hereto. In addition to the foregoing, the details of each legal practitioner shall be entered on a form as per Appendix 2 hereto.

2.8 If the legal aid officer is satisfied that sufficient full-time legal practitioners have put their names forward to satisfy the expected demand for representation in the various categories of matters for the forthcoming year, then no part-time legal practitioners should be entered onto a rotation list. If there are not sufficient names, then part-time legal practitioners may be entered onto a rotation list. If this is still not sufficient, the legal aid officer may then invite full-time legal practitioners from neighbouring magisterial districts to apply for inclusion onto a rotation list, subject to the clear understanding that they will not be entitled to any travelling costs. If this is still not sufficient, the legal aid officer may then invite part-time practitioners from neighbouring magisterial districts to apply for inclusion onto a rotation list, subject to the clear understanding that they will not be entitled to any travelling costs. (It is difficult to provide a formula to determine what will be "sufficient" legal practitioners and the Board must rely on the common sense of each legal aid officer to assess what each magisterial district will require in the forthcoming year. As a rough guideline, it is suggested that no rotation lists should consist of less than four legal practitioners.)

2.9 A legal practitioner who wishes to withdraw from a rotation list shall advise the legal aid officer in writing. A legal practitioner who ceases to practice in the magisterial district concerned shall be removed from any rotation list for that district.

2.10 A legal practitioner who, not having put forward his name timorously, wishes to be placed on a rotation list must satisfy the legal aid officer that there is good cause for such late application.

A legal practitioner whose name is removed for reasons other than those cited in 2.9 shall be placed on the exclusionary list. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the name of a legal practitioner will be placed on the exclusionary list:

If the Board resolves to place the name of a legal practitioner on the exclusionary list;

2.11.2 If the CEO decides to act on the request of a monitoring or Professional committee to place the name of a legal practitioner on the exclusionary list;

2.11.3 As a result of the legal practitioner having instituted legal action against the Board, until such legal proceedings have been finally determined.

2.11.4 If the CEO, after affording the said legal practitioner a reasonable opportunity to address written representations to the CEO, decides that it would not be in the interests of the Board to continue granting legal aid instructions to the legal practitioner concerned.

3. DISTRIBUTION OF LEGAL AID INSTRUCTIONS IN MATTERS IN THE MAGISTRATE’S COURTS AND CIVIL MATTERS GENERALLY


3.1 Having listed the legal practitioners alphabetically in column 2 of Appendix 1 and having assigned a number to each legal practitioner in column 1, the legal aid officer is ready to start the distribution of legal aid instructions, as per the rotation list, with effect from the first business day of January.

3.2 The name of each legal aid applicant who qualifies for legal aid in a criminal matter in the Magistrate’s Court is entered in column 3 of Appendix 1. In column 4 of Appendix 1, the legal aid officer must record whether the legal aid instruction was offered to the legal practitioner telephonically or in writing. Unless a legal aid officer specifies otherwise when offering a legal aid instruction to a legal practitioner such an offer will remain open for acceptance for one business day and shall thereafter be deemed to have been withdrawn.

3.3 The legal aid reference number must be entered in column 5 of Appendix 1. In column 6 of Appendix 1, the legal aid officer must record the date on which the instruction was first offered to the legal practitioner. By means of a cross, the legal aid officer must indicate in column 7 of Appendix 1 whether:

A - The legal practitioner accepted the legal aid instruction;
R - The legal practitioner rejected the legal aid instruction;
NR - The legal practitioner did not reply timeously;
CEO - Whether the applicant’s request to be represented by a particular legal practitioner was granted by the CEO.

3.4 The eighth column of Appendix 1 is intended for the comments of the legal aid officer. Inter alia the legal aid officer should record:

the names of persons contacted telephonically;
any authorisation numbers received from head office;
details of any complaints received;
notes of any problems experienced.

3.5 In Appendix 2, the legal aid officer must record separately, in respect of each legal practitioner, the date on which any legal aid instruction in a criminal matter in the Magistrate’s Court was offered to any legal practitioner and the response of the legal practitioner.

3.6 Appendices 1 and 2 shall be kept in a register and the register shall be inspected from time to time by the head of the office that shall record the date of the inspection and any relevant remarks in a form, as per Appendix 3.

3.7 The register shall be available during normal business hours for inspection by any legal practitioner who appears on the rotation list.

3.8 Subject to paragraph 4 below a legal aid instruction shall be offered firstly to all the practitioners on the full-time rotation list in alphabetical order, thereafter to all part-time practitioner's on the second rotation list in alphabetical order, thereafter to all the full-time practitioners on the third rotation list in alphabetical order, thereafter to all the part-time practitioners on the fourth rotation list. In each instance, the legal aid officer shall commence with the legal practitioner whose name directly follows the name of the legal practitioner to whom a legal aid instruction was last issued.

4. MONITORING COMMITTEES


4.1 The legal practitioners whose names appear on the rotation list for criminal matters in the Magistrate’s Court in the respective magisterial district shall be entitled but not obliged to form a monitoring committee for that magisterial district.

4.2 The monitoring committee shall consist of not less than three and not more than five legal practitioners elected at a meeting called for the purpose on not less than four weeks written notice to all applicable legal practitioners.

4.3 The legal aid officer shall not be a member of the monitoring committee but may attend meetings of the monitoring committee as an observer.

4.4 Irrespective of when such was elected, the monitoring committee shall cease to hold office on 31st December in the year in which it was elected.
4.5 The monitoring committee shall not exercise any disciplinary function but shall refer any complaint received by it concerning the quality of the legal representation provided in any criminal matter to the relevant professional association. The monitoring committee may however recommend to the CEO and/or the Board removal of the name of any legal practitioner from the Magistrate’s Court rotation list for either a specified period or indefinitely.

4.6 The monitoring committee may make recommendations to the CEO as to:

4.6.1 the payment of interim fees in any particular matter;

the payment of increased fees in any particular matter;

the authorisation of disbursements in any particular matter;

4.6.4 the instruction of any additional legal practitioner(s) in any particular matter; and/or

4.6.5 The instruction of a second or subsequent legal practitioner in any particular matter in which the mandate of the first practitioner instructed by the legal aid officer to act on behalf of the accused in the Magistrate’s Court has been terminated or in which the legal practitioner originally instructed in the Magistrate’s Court is no longer acting for whatever reason.

0-6
5. DISTRIBUTION OF LEGAL AID INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE HIGH COURT

5.1 Having listed the legal practitioners alphabetically in column 2 of Appendix 1 and having assigned a number to each legal practitioner in column 1, the legal aid officer is ready to start the distribution of legal aid instructions, as per the rotation list, with effect from the first business day of January.

5.2 The legal aid officer will divide the names of the approved legal practitioners into the various professional associations exercising disciplinary control over the legal practitioners concerned i.e. the Law Society of the province concerned, the Criminal Law Bar of South Africa and the relevant subsidiary bar of the General Council of the Bar of South Africa. From this, the legal aid officer will calculate the proportion of the legal aid instructions in the High Court that the members of each professional association are to receive

5.3 The legal aid officer shall liase with the Chief Magistrate of the magisterial district within which the seat of the division of the High Court concerned is located and any other magistrate with whom it may prove necessary to liase, with a view to ensuring an arrangement in terms of which:

An accused who is informed that the Director of Public Prosecutors has decided that the accused is to be indicted before the High Court should simultaneously be advised of his/her right to apply for legal representation in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996. The accused should simultaneously also be informed by the magistrate before whom he/she appears that any legal aid already granted to the accused in respect of the proceedings before the Magistrate’s Court will ipso facto terminate upon the transfer of the matter to the High Court.

If the accused indicates to the magistrate that he/she has need of legal representation in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996 in respect of the proceedings before the High Court, the magistrate should refer the accused to the local legal aid officer.

5.3.3 If the accused is not in detention, the magistrate should indicate to the accused where the local legal aid officer may be located.

5.3.4 If the accused is in detention, the magistrate should either arrange for the accused to be escorted to the local legal aid officer or for the local legal aid officer to attend upon the accused at the cells of the Magistrate’s Court.

5.4 The legal aid officer will deal with the accused’s application for legal aid in the normal manner, i.e. as set out in Chapters 2 and 3 of the Legal Aid Guide as supplemented by circulars from time to time. If the legal aid officer comes to the conclusion that the accused is unable to pay for his/her own legal representation in respect of the proceedings to be conducted before the High Court, legal aid shall be granted to the accused. If the legal aid officer finds that the accused does not qualify for legal representation in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996, the legal aid officer shall forthwith advise the Director of Public Prosecutions of the division concerned and the accused in writing that legal aid has been refused as per Annexure L hereto.

5.5 Well in advance of the commencement of each term, the legal aid officer, in consultation with the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, shall ensure that all accused to be arraigned within the forthcoming term, who will require legal representation at State expense in terms of Section 35(3)(g) of the Constitution, 1996, have applied for legal aid and that such has either been granted or refused. If any accused has not as yet applied for legal aid, the legal aid officer will ascertain the whereabouts of the accused from the Director of Public Prosecutions and either obtain that officer’s confirmation that it will not be necessary for the State to provide legal representation for the accused or forthwith arrange to call upon such accused and invite said accused to apply for legal aid.

5.6 The legal aid officer shall simultaneously ascertain from the Director of Public Prosecutions in any matter in which there is more than one accused, how many legal practitioners are required in respect of the matter as a whole and which accused may be represented by a single legal practitioner.

5.7 As soon as the legal aid officer has determined the legal aid instructions to be issued in respect of criminal matters for the forthcoming term, he/she shall issue suitable legal aid instructions leaving blank the details of the legal practitioner to be instructed.

5.8 In accordance with the percentages calculated in 5.2, the legal aid officer will divide the legal aid instructions between the professional associations. The blank instructions must then be sent to the liaison officer appointed for the purpose by the professional association, together with the relevant rotation list.

The professional association will then be responsible for obtaining the relevant indictment, summary of substantial facts and docket from the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions. Taking into account the degree of experience required to handle each particular matter, the professional association will distribute the legal aid instructions, duly completed, amongst those of its members whose names appear on the relevant rotation list. The LA 2A and B forms must be forwarded by the professional association to the legal practitioner instructed while the LA 2C and LA 2D forms, with the details of the legal practitioner now inserted, must be returned to the legal aid officer, who will in turn forward the LA 2C form with the relevant LA 1 and LA 13, if any, to the Board’s Head Office.

5.9 The name of each legal aid applicant who qualified for legal aid in a criminal matter in the High Court is entered in column 3 of Appendix 1. Column 4 of Appendix 1 may be left blank

5.10 The legal aid reference number must be entered in column 5 of Appendix 1. In column 6 of Appendix 1, the legal aid officer must record the date on which the instruction was forwarded to the professional association. Column 7 may be left blank.

5.11 The eighth column of Appendix 1 is intended for the comments of the legal aid officer.

5.12 In Appendix 2, the legal aid officer must record separately, in respect of each legal practitioner, the date on which any legal aid instruction in a criminal matter in the High Court was offered to any legal practitioner and the response of the legal practitioner.

5.13 Appendix 1 and the aforementioned calculations shall be kept in a register and the register shall be inspected from time to time by the head of the office who shall record the date of the inspection and any relevant remarks in a form, as per Appendix.

5.14 The register shall be available during normal business hours for inspection by any legal practitioner who appears on the rotation list.

6. PROFESSIONAL COMMITTEES

6.1 The legal practitioners whose names appear on the rotation list for criminal matters in the High Court in the respective magisterial district shall be entitled, but not obliged, to form a professional committee for that magisterial district.

6.2 The professional committee shall consist of not less than three and not more than five legal practitioners elected at a meeting called for the purpose on not less than four weeks written notice to all applicable legal practitioners.

6.3 The legal aid officer shall ex officio are a member of the professional committee.

6.4 Irrespective of when such was elected, the professional committee shall cease to hold office on 31 December in the year in which it was elected.
0-9
6.5 The functions of the professional committee shall be limited to those functions set out below and such matters as may be reasonably incidental thereto.

6.6 A professional committee may decide to allocate, in respect of each legal aid instruction in the High Court in a criminal matter, a more senior legal practitioner to supervise, assist and provide guidance to the legal practitioner who is to receive a legal aid instruction. In the event of the professional committee deciding to implement such a system, no additional fees or charges shall be payable by the Board as a result thereof.

6.7 The professional committee shall not exercise any disciplinary function but shall refer any complaint received by it concerning the quality of the legal representation provided in any criminal matter to the relevant professional association. The professional committee may however recommend to the CEO and/or the Board removal of the name of any legal practitioner from the High Court rotation list for either a specified period or indefinitely.

6.8 The professional committee may make recommendations to the CEO as to:

6.8.1 the payment of interim fees in any particular matter;

6.8.2 the payment of increased fees in any particular matter;

6.8.3 the authorisation of disbursements in any particular matter;

the instruction of any additional legal practitioner(s) in any particular matter; and/or

the instruction of a second or subsequent legal practitioner in any particular matter in which the mandate of the first practitioner instructed by the legal aid officer to act on behalf of the accused in the High Court has been terminated or in which the legal practitioner originally instructed in the High Court is no longer acting for whatever reason.

GENERAL

7.1 Notwithstanding anything contained in the Guide, no legal aid officer shall issue any legal aid instruction in any criminal matter in favour of any legal practitioner who practises for his/her own account unless and until such legal aid officer has satisfied himself/herself that there is no legal practitioner or candidate attorney in the employ of the Board available to undertake the matter.

Notwithstanding anything contained in the Guide, the CEO reserves the right to instruct any particular legal practitioner in any particular matter, notwithstanding that the chosen legal practitioner is not next in line to receive the legal aid instruction in question or that the chosen legal practitioner may not be on the relevant rotation list or even be eligible for inclusion on the relevant rotation list. The discretion of the CEO to authorise the issue of such out-of-turn instructions shall be exercised on the basis of good cause. In the event of a matter being part heard, and no matter shall be deemed to be part heard until the accused has pleaded and the State has thereafter commenced leading evidence, the CEO shall assume, subject to what is set out below, that good cause exists for the issue of an out-of-turn instruction in favour of the legal practitioner instructed by the legal aid applicant prior to the grant of legal aid. The CEO however has discretion to require the legal practitioner in question to satisfy him/her in writing that the legal Practitioner has not made himself/herself guilty of overreaching. If a matter is not part heard, the CEO shall assume that no good cause exists to justify the issue of an out-of-turn instruction unless and until the legal aid applicant has satisfied the CEO in writing that such good cause exists. In the event of an out-of-turn instruction being authorised and issued in favour of a legal practitioner whose name appears on the relevant rotation list, the legal aid officer shall pass over such practitioner when next he/she would otherwise have been entitled to receive a legal aid instruction.

7.3 The legal practitioner who accepts a legal aid instruction in a criminal matter must ensure that he/she personally executes the instruction. Where appropriate, an attorney may delegate this personal responsibility to a candidate attorney articled to him/her. However, in any matter in which the CEO has agreed to increased fees any work performed by any candidate attorney of the practitioner concerned shall be remunerated in accordance with the standard legal aid tariff. Instructions may not be transferred from one legal practitioner to another - even within a practice. The rule against the transfer of instructions may be relaxed in the event of illness, preventing the practitioner from working or other genuine sudden and unforeseeable emergencies. However in no circumstances, will the Board be liable for payment of fees in respect of the rendering of professional services by any person other than the legal practitioner instructed and his/her candidate attorney.

Appendix 2
LEGAL AID BOARD

SUMMARY OF INSTRUCTIONS TO PRACTITIONERS IN CRIMINAL/CIVIL/HIGH COURT CRIMINAL MATTERS


Name of Practitioner

 


Firm Address

 


Telephone Number

     


Rotation List Number

     

Instruction
Date

Reply

Instruction
Date

Reply

Instruction
Date

Reply

Instruction
Date

Reply


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D


/ /


A


R


NR


D