BANKING COUNCIL
Proposed amendment to the South African Reserve Bank Act
Minimum Reserve Requirements
Country |
Nominal ROE (A) |
Risk-free return (B) |
Compensation for risk ( A - B) |
South Africa |
|
|
|
ABSA |
19% |
15% |
4% |
Nedcor |
23% |
15% |
8% |
Standard |
18% |
15% |
3% |
African Countries |
|
|
|
Ghana |
75% |
25% |
50% |
Kenya |
36% |
9% |
27% |
Nigeria |
41% |
14% |
27% |
Botswana |
39% |
13% |
26% |
Namibia |
28% |
16% |
12% |
Mauritius |
14% |
13% |
1% |
Zimbabwe |
37% |
42% |
(5%) |
Developed Countries |
|
|
|
UK |
20% |
5% |
15% |
Canada |
17% |
5% |
12% |
USA super regionals |
15% |
5% |
10% |
Australia |
15% |
5% |
10% |
Source: KPMG International Banking Surveys
The figures in the last column demonstrate that there is little scope for South African retail banks to lower their profits.
Recovering the cost
The alternative when additional costs are incurred is to recover them from the banking public. Because of the advent of niche banks (as discussed above), which compete with full service banks in specific market sectors, costs are recovered directly from the customers who use that service in respect of which the cost is incurred. This means that if the cost of holding and distributing cash increases, the users of cash will be charged extra for that service. As demonstrated below, this will affect mainly the lower income and rural communities.
SECTOR |
Informal sector |
Salaried formal sector |
Professional |
BASIS OF |
Cash |
Cheque book, debit and credit card |
Credit card, electronic transfers |
Additional costs create disincentives for banks to service the cash-intensive low income market. If higher costs result in customers no longer using the services, the bank will contract those services. In this case banks may be forced to close rural and marginal branches.
Global competition
Because of the mobility of capital and financial assets in the global economy, banks in South Africa are in direct competition with banks in other countries. Any cost imposed on a South African Bank which is not also imposed in banks in other countries, put South African banks at a competitive disadvantage. Banks in the UK (which does not impose a minimum reserve balance) are thus at an advantage over South African banks in tendering for any banking business.
Compensation
None of the adverse consequences demonstrated above would result if the retail banks which stand to lose the advantage of their vault cash deduction, were to be compensated in some other way.
There are two components to the cash distribution function which commercial banks perform on behalf of the Reserve Bank: (i) the holding of cash and (ii) the delivery of the cash.
The cost of holding cash is the interest which the bank could have earned had it invested that cash in an income producing asset (government bonds, for example). The cost of delivering the cash is the cost associated with security, branches and ATM networks.
If no compensation were offered for holding the cash and compensation were only paid for moving (delivering) the cash, banks would minimise their losses by holding as little cash as possible, and would return all excess cash to the Reserve Bank on a daily basis. This would significantly increase the amount of "cash in transit" and would create additional costs and additional opportunities for crime.
The Retail Banks are thus in favour of a basis of compensation based on the cash holding, which would minimise their need to move cash to and from Reserve Bank branches.
It should be noted, that the views expressed in this paragraph on compensation are those of the major retail banks and are not shared by the whole banking industry.
Conclusion
The Banking Industry is grateful for the willingness of the Reserve Bank to address these issues.